{"id":489676,"date":"2010-03-30T11:08:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-30T15:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4079894.post-1214768935521299191"},"modified":"2010-03-30T11:08:00","modified_gmt":"2010-03-30T15:08:00","slug":"supreme-court-rules-defendants-right-to-impartial-jury-not-violated","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/489676","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court rules defendant&#8217;s right to impartial jury not violated"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[JURIST] The US Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled unanimously in Berghuis v. Smith that a defendant&#8217;s Sixth Amendment right to a jury drawn from a fair cross-section of the community was not violated when the African-American representation on the jury was disproportionate to the community population. The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit applied the comparative-disparity test, which calculates the percentage of otherwise eligible jurors from a given group who are excluded from jury service, and held that the defendant&#8217;s right was violated. In reversing the decision below, the court declined to adopt an explicit standard. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote:Each test is imperfect. Absolute disparity and comparative disparity measurements, courts have recognized, can be misleading when, as here, &#8220;members of the distinctive group comp a small percentage of those eligible for jury service.&#8221; And to our knowledge, &#8220;o court &#8230; has accepted alone as determinative in Sixth Amendment challenges to jury selection systems.&#8221;Justice Clarence Thomas filed a concurring opinion.<br \/>\nThe defendant, Diapolis Smith, is an African-American convicted of second-degree murder by an all-white jury in Kent County, Michigan in 1993. At the time of Smith&#8217;s trial, African-Americans constituted 7.28 percent of Kent County&#8217;s jury-eligible population, and 6 percent of the pool from which potential jurors were drawn.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[JURIST] The US Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled unanimously in Berghuis v. Smith that a defendant&#8217;s Sixth Amendment right to a jury drawn from a fair cross-section of the community was not violated when the African-American representation on the jury was disproportionate to the community population. The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4174,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-489676","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/489676","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4174"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=489676"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/489676\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=489676"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=489676"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=489676"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}