{"id":499244,"date":"2010-03-31T21:47:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-01T01:47:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100331\/1040388809.shtml"},"modified":"2010-03-31T21:47:00","modified_gmt":"2010-04-01T01:47:00","slug":"judge-tells-isohunt-to-wave-magic-wand-block-all-infringement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/499244","title":{"rendered":"Judge Tells IsoHunt To Wave Magic Wand; Block All Infringement"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This really is not a huge surprise, but in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20091223\/1924027493.shtml\">IsoHunt case<\/a> the judge has now ordered site operator Gary Fung to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/threatlevel\/2010\/03\/isohunt\/\" >magically stop anyone from infringing<\/a> (<b>Update<\/b>: as noted in the comments this is just a &#8220;proposed&#8221; order, but it seems likely that this is where the judge is heading).  It is, as Fung notes, effectively a shut down order.  There&#8217;s no legitimate way for Fung to magically know what content is infringing and what is not, since his system is really no different than a search engine.  While the original ruling concerned a few of Fung&#8217;s actions that the judge claimed were inducing, it looks like the judge won&#8217;t even give Fung a chance to try to set up a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20100225\/0332398304.shtml\">non-inducing<\/a> search engine.<br \/>\n<br \/><Br><br \/>\nThere are some odd statements in the ruling, including the judge claiming:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i><br \/>\n&#8220;It is axiomatic that the availability of free infringing copies of plaintiffs&#8217; works through defendants&#8217; websites irreparably undermines the growing legitimate market  for consumers to purchase access to the same works,&#8221;<br \/>\n<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There&#8217;s just one (big) problem with that.  It is not at all axiomatic.  We&#8217;ve seen many content creators embrace file sharing as part of a legitimate market, and in doing so, make more money.  So the judge is claiming something that is a universal truth that is false.  That seems quite troubling.<br \/>\n<br \/><Br><br \/>\nSeparately, the ruling seems to suggest that a <i>keyword filter<\/i> might stop the infringement.  That takes me back.  Judge Patel in the original Napster case made the same demand, and it was a disaster, because a keyword filter is useless.<br \/>\n<br \/><Br><br \/>\nBut the bigger issue is that the judge seems to have gone way beyond what the law actually says and allows in this situation.  The site can be barred for <i>inducing<\/i> infringement, but that doesn&#8217;t mean a site automatically must block anything that might be infringing.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100331\/1040388809.shtml\">Permalink<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100331\/1040388809.shtml#comments\">Comments<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/article.php?sid=20100331\/1040388809&#038;op=sharethis\">Email This Story<\/a><br \/>\n <br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/click.phdo?s=e3c8505d8084129c26040d776d9943c7&#038;p=1\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" style=\"border: 0;\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/img.phdo?s=e3c8505d8084129c26040d776d9943c7&#038;p=1\"\/><\/a><br \/>\n<!-- foo --><\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.techdirt.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?a=QWTtTfEe9gg:TVSCL3VOeTk:D7DqB2pKExk\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?i=QWTtTfEe9gg:TVSCL3VOeTk:D7DqB2pKExk\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.techdirt.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?a=QWTtTfEe9gg:TVSCL3VOeTk:c-S6u7MTCTE\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?d=c-S6u7MTCTE\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/techdirt\/feed\/~4\/QWTtTfEe9gg\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This really is not a huge surprise, but in the IsoHunt case the judge has now ordered site operator Gary Fung to magically stop anyone from infringing (Update: as noted in the comments this is just a &#8220;proposed&#8221; order, but it seems likely that this is where the judge is heading). It is, as Fung [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-499244","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/499244","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=499244"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/499244\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=499244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=499244"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=499244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}