{"id":504273,"date":"2010-04-01T23:59:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-02T03:59:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100329\/0145518759.shtml"},"modified":"2010-04-01T23:59:00","modified_gmt":"2010-04-02T03:59:00","slug":"israeli-supreme-court-says-there-is-no-legal-way-to-reveal-anonymous-commenters-online","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/504273","title":{"rendered":"Israeli Supreme Court Says There Is No Legal Way To Reveal Anonymous Commenters Online"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Earlier this year, we wrote about a ruling in Israel that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20100126\/0759327901.shtml\">protected the anonymity<\/a> of an online commenter on free speech grounds, with the judge noting:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i><br \/>\n&#8220;The good of online anonymity outweighs the bad, and it must be seen as a byproduct of freedom of speech and the right to privacy.&#8221;<br \/>\n<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/PrivacyLaw\/statuses\/11218445405\" >Michael Scott<\/a> now points us to another ruling in Israel, this time in the country&#8217;s Supreme Court that appears to go further (unless I&#8217;m misunderstanding Israeli law &#8212; which is entirely possible) in saying that <a href=\"http:\/\/2jk.org\/english\/?p=197\" >there isn&#8217;t even a legal procedure to unveil anonymous commenters<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i><br \/>\nHon. Justice Eliezer Rivlin dismissed Mor&#8217;s petition and analysed the procedure to reveal anonymous posters. According to his ruling &#8220;it is an attempt to harness, prior to a legal proceeding, the justice system and a third party in order to conduct an inquiry which will lead to the revealing of a person committing a tort so that a civil suit could be filed against him. It is, de facto, an investigative-like procedure that the court is drafted to in a preliminary procedure in this way or another. This procedure is not trivial, it involves policy consideration and requires legislative regulation&#8221;. His decision rules, actually, that until a procedure will be legislated, petitions to reveal anonymous users may not be granted (and according to estimations, there is at least one daily request per ISP).<br \/>\n<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As the analysis at the link above suggests, this likely means that politicians will quickly draft legislation to create a procedure for unveiling anonymous commenters, but the court did warn that any such procedure should tread carefully:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i><br \/>\nShattering the &#8216;illusion of anonymity&#8217;, in a reality where a user&#8217;s privacy feeling is a myth, may raise associations of a &#8220;big brother&#8221;. Such violation of privacy should be minimized. In adequate boundaries the anonymity shelters should be preserved as a part of the Internet Culture. You may say that anonymity makes the internet what it is, and without it the virtual freedom may be reduced.<br \/>\n<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100329\/0145518759.shtml\">Permalink<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100329\/0145518759.shtml#comments\">Comments<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/article.php?sid=20100329\/0145518759&#038;op=sharethis\">Email This Story<\/a><br \/>\n <br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/click.phdo?s=a2da14c77ffc8e5213a6633f85b7b5d5&#038;p=1\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" style=\"border: 0;\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/img.phdo?s=a2da14c77ffc8e5213a6633f85b7b5d5&#038;p=1\"\/><\/a><br \/>\n<!-- foo --><\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.techdirt.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?a=Hw4ySAcJHYY:mYgkSXMi-_Y:D7DqB2pKExk\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?i=Hw4ySAcJHYY:mYgkSXMi-_Y:D7DqB2pKExk\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.techdirt.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?a=Hw4ySAcJHYY:mYgkSXMi-_Y:c-S6u7MTCTE\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?d=c-S6u7MTCTE\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/techdirt\/feed\/~4\/Hw4ySAcJHYY\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Earlier this year, we wrote about a ruling in Israel that protected the anonymity of an online commenter on free speech grounds, with the judge noting: &#8220;The good of online anonymity outweighs the bad, and it must be seen as a byproduct of freedom of speech and the right to privacy.&#8221; Michael Scott now points [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-504273","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/504273","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=504273"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/504273\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=504273"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=504273"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=504273"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}