Can a man who once refused the gift of a doormat \u2014 because, as he wrote, \u201cIt\u2019s best to avoid the beginnings of evil\u201d \u2014 continue to inspire people in how to live simply?<\/p>\n
The answer is yes, but with stipulations, said scholar Lawrence Buell<\/a> at a Harvard<\/a> lecture last week (March 25).<\/p>\n Buell, Powell M. Cabot Professor of American Literature, explored the continuing significance of Henry David Thoreau\u2019s seminal \u201cWalden,\u201d the 1854 book that chronicles the author\u2019s two-and-a-half year experiment with simple living in the woods of Concord, Mass., near Walden Pond. The discussion was titled \u201cDoes Thoreau Have a Future? Reimagining Voluntary Simplicity in the Twenty-First Century.\u201d<\/p>\n Buell referenced examples of literature on voluntary simplicity from the past, including Thoreau contemporary Lydia Maria Child<\/a>, whose 1829 book \u201cThe American Frugal Housewife\u201d promoted \u201cfrugal efficiency as moral imperative.\u201d<\/p>\n The scholar also included examples of current authors who promote the simple life, including Duane Elgin<\/a> and his work \u201cVoluntary Simplicity<\/a>,\u201d and Colin Beavan<\/a>, a New York City author who recounted his efforts to limit drastically his environmental impact in the book \u201cNo Impact Man<\/a>: The Adventures of a Guilty Liberal Who Attempts to Save the Planet, and the Discoveries He Makes About Himself and Our Way of Life in the Process.\u201d<\/p>\n But aspects of voluntary simplicity in a 21st century framework beg certain questions, said Buell, which can be explored with the help of Thoreau\u2019s work, as well as that of contemporary authors.<\/p>\n One challenge to voluntary simplicity\u2019s conventional wisdom, said the Harvard professor, is the notion that it\u2019s mainly a choice left to the privileged rather than the poor.<\/p>\n Recalling a sociologist\u2019s words, Buell said, \u201cVoluntary simplicity is a choice faced by a successful corporate lawyer, not a homeless person.\u201d But Thoreau offers insights in this area, said Buell, noting that his writings in \u201cWalden\u201d are more often than not directed at those \u201chard-pressed to make ends meet.\u201d<\/p>\n While Thoreau\u2019s work may have promoted individual action versus a united front, the message was inspiring, and continues to inspire, said Buell, despite the fears of those who argue that it will never amount to a critical mass of action.<\/p>\n As a counter to those who worry that voluntary simplicity is too individualistic, Buell offered the words of Beavan, who said that in the aftermath of his own simple-living experiment, \u201che continues to challenge the people around him\u201d to make changes to save the planet.<\/p>\n Buell\u2019s talk at Harvard Divinity School <\/a>was part of a lecture series titled \u201cEcologies of Human Flourishing,\u201d<\/a> co-sponsored by the Center for the Study of World Religions<\/a>.<\/p>\n In his final remarks, Buell enlisted the help of theologian and physician Albert Schweitzer, whom he called \u201ca heroic example of voluntary simplicity\u201d who \u201copted for a life of privation\u201d to serve others. Buell surmised that if he could solicit Schweitzer\u2019s and Thoreau\u2019s opinions on the current importance of voluntary simplicity, they would likely agree that it \u201cis necessary as a precondition for human integrity and flourishing, even if not sufficient to preserve the world from ruin in the long run.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cIf that\u2019s right,\u201d said Buell, \u201cthen humankind would be foolish to trust to voluntary simplicity alone, but equally foolish to disown it.\u201d<\/p>\n Diana Eck<\/a> gave the response to Buell\u2019s lecture and shared her own connections with Thoreau. Eck, professor of comparative religion and Indian studies and director of Harvard\u2019s Pluralism Project<\/a>, admitted to keeping a copy of the text, which she said came close to the status of scripture, next to her bed.<\/p>\n The work, said Eck, provides not so much a model for replication as a type of provocation or awakening with its nourishing passages \u201cthat are wonderful to contemplate.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201c\u2018Walden\u2019 is an elegant and provocative work, and as long as we are attuned and willing to be provoked by that ornery ancestor \u2026 we will find that this kind of inspiration lives on, because it asks the kinds of questions we need to be asking.\u201d<\/p>\n Next in the series is \u201cWhat\u2019s Enough? A Conversation Between the Harvard Business School and the Harvard Divinity School,\u201d featuring Howard Stevenson, the Sarofim-Rock Baker Foundation Professor of Business Administration and senior associate dean at Harvard Business School, 5:15-7 p.m., April 12, Sperry Room, Andover Hall, Harvard Divinity School. Reservations required: Visit the Web site<\/a> or call 617.495.4476 to register.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Can a man who once refused the gift of a doormat \u2014 because, as he wrote, \u201cIt\u2019s best to avoid the beginnings of evil\u201d \u2014 continue to inspire people in how to live simply? The answer is yes, but with stipulations, said scholar Lawrence Buell at a Harvard lecture last week (March 25). Buell, Powell […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4175,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-505141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/505141","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4175"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=505141"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/505141\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=505141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=505141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=505141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}