{"id":515428,"date":"2010-04-05T08:44:19","date_gmt":"2010-04-05T12:44:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu\/nll\/?p=2234"},"modified":"2010-04-05T08:44:19","modified_gmt":"2010-04-05T12:44:19","slug":"explanatory-neurophilia-%e2%89%85-physics-envy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/515428","title":{"rendered":"Explanatory Neurophilia \u2245 Physics Envy?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Jonathan Weinberg wrote to suggest that perhaps &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu\/nll\/?p=1378\">explanatory neurophilia<\/a>&#8221; (the fact that people tend to be impressed and persuaded by neuroscientific details even if they provide no explanatory value) is part of a larger phenomenon that also includes &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.balloon-juice.com\/2010\/04\/04\/lets-get-physical\/\">physics envy<\/a>&#8221; (the desire to achieve in other sciences the success of mathematical reasoning from first principles that Newton brought to physics).<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-2234\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p>The cited post by DougJ at Balloon Juice suggests the relationship explicitly:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">There\u2019s a more general science envy in the nexus of finance, social science, and media. In a few weeks, Bobo Brooks will come out with a book purporting to be about neuroscience which will in fact be a bunch of pop psychology about how conservatives are right about everything.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>This has certainly been a recurring theme in David Brooks&#8217; columns over the past few years (see &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/itre.cis.upenn.edu\/%7Emyl\/languagelog\/archives\/003246.html\">David Brooks, Cognitive Neuroscientist<\/a>&#8220;, 6\/12\/2006; &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/itre.cis.upenn.edu\/%7Emyl\/languagelog\/archives\/003586.html\">David Brooks, Neuroendocrinologist<\/a>&#8220;, 9\/17\/2006; &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu\/nll\/?p=478\">David Brooks, Social Psychologist<\/a>&#8220;, 8\/13\/2008; &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu\/nll\/?p=1305\">An inquiry concerning the principles of morals&#8221;<\/a>, 4\/7\/2009), but if he&#8217;s got a book on this topic coming out, you can&#8217;t pre-order it on amazon yet&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Getting back to the &#8220;explanatory neurophilia \u2245 physics envy&#8221; idea, it seems to me that there are some analogies but also some striking differences. The research of Weisberg et al. on &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.yale.edu\/cogdevlab\/People\/Lab_Members\/Frank\/aarticles\/The%20Seductive%20Allure.pdf\">The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations<\/a>&#8221; suggests that logically irrelevant neuroscience impresses novices and outsiders, but not experts. In contrast, Lo and Mueller <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/pdf\/1003.2688v3\">argue<\/a> that the seductive allure of irrelevant but interesting mathematics has distorted the judgment of the most highly-regarded economists and financial analysts.<\/p>\n<p>For those who are interested in the sociology of economics (about which I obviously know very little), I recommend Deirdre McCloskey&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prickly-paradigm.com\/paradigm4.pdf\">The Secret Sins of Economics<\/a> (summary and discussion <a href=\"http:\/\/itre.cis.upenn.edu\/~myl\/languagelog\/archives\/001455.html\">here<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>And in any area of rational inquiry, the best advice comes from <a href=\"http:\/\/itre.cis.upenn.edu\/~myl\/languagelog\/archives\/001554.html\">Dick Hamming<\/a>: &#8220;Beware of finding what you&#8217;re looking for&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jonathan Weinberg wrote to suggest that perhaps &#8220;explanatory neurophilia&#8221; (the fact that people tend to be impressed and persuaded by neuroscientific details even if they provide no explanatory value) is part of a larger phenomenon that also includes &#8220;physics envy&#8221; (the desire to achieve in other sciences the success of mathematical reasoning from first principles [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4144,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-515428","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/515428","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4144"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=515428"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/515428\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=515428"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=515428"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=515428"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}