{"id":519047,"date":"2010-04-07T09:41:02","date_gmt":"2010-04-07T13:41:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/washingtonindependent.com\/?p=81557"},"modified":"2010-04-07T09:41:02","modified_gmt":"2010-04-07T13:41:02","slug":"an-obama-plan-for-mideast-peace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/519047","title":{"rendered":"An Obama Plan for Mideast Peace?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An anonymous administration official runs an idea up David Ignatius&#8217; flagpole: Frustrated with the poor-to-intransigent pace of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, which are barely at the &#8220;indirect&#8221; phase, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2010\/04\/06\/AR2010040602663.html\">President Obama is considering proposing his own Mideast-peace plan<\/a>. That&#8217;s something <a href=\"http:\/\/washingtonindependent.com\/79667\/will-clinton-issue-challenge-to-israel-on-settlements\">the two-state-solution community urged him and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to pursue<\/a> after last month&#8217;s friction with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over Jerusalem settlements.<\/p>\n<p>Ignatius reports that it would take a wide, regional focus:<span id=\"more-81557\"><\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The American peace plan would be linked with the issue of confronting Iran, which is Israel&#8217;s top priority, explained the second senior official. He described the issues as two halves of a single strategic problem: &#8220;We want to get the debate away from settlements and East Jerusalem and take it to a 30,000-feet level that can involve Jordan, Syria and other countries in the region,&#8221; as well as the Israelis and Palestinians.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Incrementalism hasn&#8217;t worked,&#8221; continued the second official, explaining that the United States cannot allow the Palestinian problem to keep festering &#8212; providing fodder for Iran and other extremists. &#8220;As a global power with global responsibilities, we have to do something.&#8221; He said the plan would &#8220;take on the absolute requirements of Israeli security and the requirements of Palestinian sovereignty in a way that makes sense.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>This has apparently come with the aid of foreign-policy greybeards from both parties, like Brent Scowcroft, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Sandy Berger, Frank Carlucci, Robert MacFarlane\u00a0and Colin Powell. The administration certainly leaked that to frame this prospective initiative as a consensus view. (Because, frankly, <em>it is<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<p>That, and the other specificity cited by Ignatius &#8212; the administration could start interagency discussions modeled on the Afghanistan-Pakistan strategy and unveil a plan by the fall &#8212; support the initial judgment that this has already been well-discussed internally. On the other hand, it could be a shot across Netanyahu&#8217;s bow, telling him that if he doesn&#8217;t take some confidence-building measures &#8212; and soon &#8212; the Obama administration will launch its own very big peacemaking agenda, and that&#8217;s not going to be something Israel will want to be viewed as opposing.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An anonymous administration official runs an idea up David Ignatius&#8217; flagpole: Frustrated with the poor-to-intransigent pace of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, which are barely at the &#8220;indirect&#8221; phase, President Obama is considering proposing his own Mideast-peace plan. That&#8217;s something the two-state-solution community urged him and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to pursue after last month&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4314,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-519047","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/519047","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4314"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=519047"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/519047\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=519047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=519047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=519047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}