{"id":520044,"date":"2010-04-08T03:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-08T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/2010\/04\/08\/2663002\/curtis-park-plan-must-meet-toxics.html#mi_rss=Opinion"},"modified":"2010-04-08T03:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-04-08T07:00:00","slug":"viewpoints-curtis-park-plan-must-meet-toxics-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/520044","title":{"rendered":"Viewpoints: Curtis Park plan must meet toxics law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Judging by its editorials, The Bee seems to think that Curtis Park Village is primarily a test of the city&#8217;s ability to do an infill project. <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not that simple. <\/p>\n<p>The Curtis Park railyard is a state Superfund site. Its soil is laced with lead, arsenic and other cancer-causing pollutants. The central issue that&#8217;s haunted this piece of property for 23 years is that every time someone sticks a shovel into the ground, more hazardous waste turns up. That&#8217;s because this property was more than a &#8220;railyard.&#8221; For decades, it was a large, very dirty, locomotive repair shop and unlicensed, unlined industrial landfill. <\/p>\n<p>So what should be done with the mountain of hazardous waste that has been dug up and left piled up in recent years? <\/p>\n<p>The developer Paul Petrovich and Union Pacific want to renege on the railroad&#8217;s 1995 cleanup agreement to ship the hazardous waste to a licensed landfill in Utah owned by the railroad. They prefer to bury the waste on site beneath a planned 7 acre &#8220;park.&#8221; Petrovich told the City Council the other night that he would &#8220;try&#8221; to bury it under other on-site locations, but he makes no enforceable promise. In fact, he issued a not-so-thinly-veiled threat: Prohibit use of the park as a disposal site, he told the council, and I will walk away from this project. <\/p>\n<p>Many Curtis Park residents and city officials fear Petrovich will do exactly that and leave the hazardous waste stacked high on the site. But it&#8217;s an empty threat. First, it&#8217;s illegal. The soil he has dug up is a public nuisance, and he and the railroad can be prosecuted for leaving it in its current condition. <\/p>\n<p>Even more significant, more than 10 years ago, Mayor Joe Serna and the City Council sponsored Senate Bill 120 (Deborah Ortiz-Darrell Steinberg) that gives the city the authority to use its zoning powers to force the promised cleanup. This law requires the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) to order a cleanup based on the city&#8217;s land-use plan for the site. Councilwoman Lauren Hammond erroneously stated: &#8220;DTSC, not the City Council, determines the final cleanup.&#8221; That&#8217;s flat wrong. <\/p>\n<p>The city attorney read from SB 120: DTSC can&#8217;t give final approval on cleanup until &#8220;all response actions necessary to conform to the approved land-use plan are complete.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>When Gov. Gray Davis signed the measure into law, he stated: &#8220;SB 120 provides additional assurance that Union Pacific will clean up the Union Pacific Railroad site to allow land uses consistent with a <i>final land use plan<\/i>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Ignoring the authority granted under SB 120, the council voted 9-0 to approve an inadequate environmental impact report and kicked the cleanup decision back to DTSC. Instead of exercising its SB 120 authority and rezoning the 7-acre &#8220;park&#8221; to prohibit the &#8220;toxic park,&#8221; the council passed a &#8220;compromise&#8221; resolution asking DTSC to tell them where the disposal site should be placed. <\/p>\n<p>The developer persuaded  the council to ask DTSC what it should do about allowing a hazardous waste facility to be placed beneath a city park. The developer hopes DTSC will bless this mess so a judge might be persuaded to certify the massive development on top of a Superfund site without adequate cleanup legal. It isn&#8217;t. <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s time for the city to get tough with Petrovich and Union Pacific Railroad. The city should: <\/p>\n<p>&#149; Rezone the 7-acre &#8220;park&#8221; to prohibit its use as a hazardous waste disposal facility. <\/p>\n<p>&#149; Require Petrovich to make public the contract between him and Union Pacific Railroad that he claims ties his hands and makes off-site disposal impossible. <\/p>\n<p>&#149; Request a state audit of Union Pacific&#8217;s compliance with its DTSC cleanup plan and SB 120. <\/p>\n<p>The protection contained in the Ortiz-Steinberg law terminates at the point the city approves the final land-use plan. That&#8217;s why flatly prohibiting the toxic park must be made a part of any rezoning of the property. After the compliance audit is complete, then and only then, should the city consider other disposal alternatives.<\/p>\n<p>As for the threat to &#8220;walk away,&#8221; it&#8217;s important to realize that the railroad is under a legally enforceable DTSC cleanup order. SB 120 specifically forbids DTSC from releasing Union Pacific from any liability for cleanup until the city approves the final land-use plan. If either the railroad or Petrovich attempts to walk away from the mess they&#8217;ve created at the Curtis Park railyard, the city attorney can and should prosecute.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Judging by its editorials, The Bee seems to think that Curtis Park Village is primarily a test of the city&#8217;s ability to do an infill project. It&#8217;s not that simple. The Curtis Park railyard is a state Superfund site. Its soil is laced with lead, arsenic and other cancer-causing pollutants. The central issue that&#8217;s haunted [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4325,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-520044","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/520044","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4325"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=520044"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/520044\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=520044"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=520044"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=520044"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}