{"id":523117,"date":"2010-04-11T03:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-11T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/2010\/04\/11\/2668461\/28-billion-pension-gap-is-ours.html#mi_rss=Opinion"},"modified":"2010-04-11T03:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-04-11T07:00:00","slug":"from-the-editor-28-billion-pension-gap-is-ours-to-repair","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/523117","title":{"rendered":"From the Editor: $28 billion pension gap is ours to repair"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Public employee pensions have become one of the prickliest topics The Bee covers, and our front-page story today adds some sobering numbers to the discussion.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s one: $28 billion.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s the collective gap, according to The Bee&#8217;s analysis, between the amount of pension money that&#8217;s invested and the amount that&#8217;s promised to employees and retirees in California&#8217;s 80 largest city and county governments.<\/p>\n<p>McClatchy&#8217;s California newspapers teamed up on this project after reporting on ways pension obligations were adding to budget headaches in one locality after another.<\/p>\n<p>Our aim was to provide the bigger picture beyond a string of local decisions.<\/p>\n<p>Phillip Reese, a Bee investigative reporter, led the work in gathering and analyzing information from local governments. His efforts yielded the best view so far of pension funding gaps statewide.<\/p>\n<p>Graphics in our print editions tell part of the numbers story; at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/investigations\">www.sacbee.com\/investigations<\/a>, you can find an interactive map with details by city and county.<\/p>\n<p>Reese worked closely with reporters from the Fresno Bee, Modesto Bee, Merced Sun-Star and San Luis Obispo Tribune, and today&#8217;s stories appear in those newspapers&#8217; print and online editions.<\/p>\n<p>As Reese and his counterparts explain, the pension pressures didn&#8217;t pop up overnight, nor are they easily solved.<\/p>\n<p>The story isn&#8217;t identical in every city or county, but there are some repeated themes: <\/p>\n<p>&#149; Many localities improved retirement benefits for public employees during healthier fiscal conditions early in the last decade.<\/p>\n<p>&#149; The stock market&#8217;s declines during the recession caused investment values to drop, and a big debate about the gap hinges on future market returns.<\/p>\n<p>&#149; Many localities increased their pension tab by raising pay for public employees, also during happier times.<\/p>\n<p>This reporting adds important context for local officials who, as stewards of public spending, make choices that affect all residents as well as employees.<\/p>\n<p>Some are considering benefits changes (mostly for future hires) to address the longer-term picture; others have taken this step already, but many are using bond money or service cuts to close the gap.<\/p>\n<p>While this report focuses on local governments, the picture that emerged mirrors state pension funding in certain ways.<\/p>\n<p>Last week, a Stanford University report kicked up dust with findings that our state&#8217;s giant pension funds, CalPERS, CalSTRS and the University of California retirement system, were understating the amount of their unfunded obligations.<\/p>\n<p>The gap, according to the report, is $500 billion. (To which an ordinary person can only say, in polite terms, holy cow!)<\/p>\n<p>The funds&#8217; leaders promptly contested the Stanford report&#8217;s findings and its calculation methods. But the matter needs much more attention and public debate.<\/p>\n<p>The Bee&#8217;s own reporting, based on information from CalPERS and CalSTRS, has shown that government employers will have to increase their contributions in coming years to meet pension obligations.<\/p>\n<p>Government&#8217;s debt is our debt &#150; taxpayers are the &#8220;employer&#8221; contributors to public pensions. So as stupefying as the large numbers can seem, we all have an interest in understanding them.<\/p>\n<p>Today&#8217;s stories are part of our commitment to digging into these complex matters and providing facts that can inform good decisions in the months ahead.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Public employee pensions have become one of the prickliest topics The Bee covers, and our front-page story today adds some sobering numbers to the discussion. Here&#8217;s one: $28 billion. That&#8217;s the collective gap, according to The Bee&#8217;s analysis, between the amount of pension money that&#8217;s invested and the amount that&#8217;s promised to employees and retirees [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4380,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-523117","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/523117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4380"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=523117"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/523117\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=523117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=523117"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=523117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}