{"id":527171,"date":"2010-04-14T09:11:33","date_gmt":"2010-04-14T13:11:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/greenenergyreporter.com\/?p=7591"},"modified":"2010-04-14T09:11:33","modified_gmt":"2010-04-14T13:11:33","slug":"reblog-big-misunderstandings-about-arra-stimulus-for-clean-energy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/527171","title":{"rendered":"Reblog: Big Misunderstandings about ARRA Stimulus for Clean Energy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.greenenergyreporter.com\/wp-content\/themes\/v1\/img\/cat\/cleantech.png\" width=\"8\" height=\"8\" alt=\"\" title=\"Cleantech\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.greenenergyreporter.com\/wp-content\/themes\/v1\/img\/cat\/funding.png\" width=\"8\" height=\"8\" alt=\"\" title=\"Funding\" \/><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.greenenergyreporter.com\/wp-content\/themes\/v1\/img\/cat\/policy.png\" width=\"8\" height=\"8\" alt=\"\" title=\"Policy\" \/><\/p>\n<p>By <a href=\"http:\/\/www.recurrentenergy.com\/company\/leadership-team.php\" >Arno Harris<\/a>, CEO of Recurrent Energy<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/www.recovery.gov\/News\/mediakit\/Picture%20Library\/RDG_Logo_RGB_800x233.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"246\" height=\"71\" \/>A few weeks ago I  flagged <a href=\"http:\/\/www.csmonitor.com\/USA\/2010\/0218\/Stimulus-funds-for-clean-energy-largely-unspent\" >a story in the Christian Science Monitor titled  &#8220;Stimulus Funds for Clean Energy Largely Unspent&#8221;<\/a> because I  thought\u00a0it deserved a clarifying &#8216;blog post. The story repeats\u00a0several  big misunderstandings about the\u00a0status of\u00a0renewable energy  programs\u00a0included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009  (ARRA). The general thrust of the story is that the lack of immediate  and large uptake of stimulus funds is a sign that the program isn&#8217;t  working or having its intended result.<\/p>\n<p>The reality is that despite the low outflows of ARRA funds to date,  the stimulus program\u00a0is playing an important role in maintaining  business continuity for developers of solar and wind projects in the US.  In fact, the expiration of the program at the end of this year poses a  major disruptive threat to the progress that&#8217;s been made in renewable  energy in the US over the last few years. It&#8217;s critical that we get the  program extended for a couple more years to enable the industry to  recover fully.<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-7591\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p>ARRA was passed in the early days of the Obama administration as the  magnitude of the\u00a0financial crisis began to unfold. Among its many  provisions was a section intended to support continued development  of\u00a0renewable energy projects&#8211;particularly wind and solar projects. The  provision allows wind and solar developers to receive\u00a0a cash grant in  lieu of\u00a0the Investment Tax Credit (ITC).<\/p>\n<p>The industry lobbied hard for these grants because the financial  crisis made it almost impossible to close tax-oriented financings. Prior  to ARRA, most renewable energy projects in the US relied on tax  credits&#8211;either the ITC for solar\u00a0or the related Production Tax Credit  (PTC) for wind.\u00a0Because most developers don&#8217;t have large current tax  liabilities, they cannot use the\u00a0tax credits themselves.  Instead\u00a0projects were typically financed in partnership with a &#8216;tax  equity&#8217; investor (an entity\u00a0with a large tax bill)\u00a0who would make a cash  investment in the project and receive the benefit of the\u00a0tax credits in  return.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<h3>Just because the funds  aren&#8217;t flowing doesn&#8217;t mean the ARRA renewable  energy grants\u00a0program\u00a0has  not been\u00a0effective&#8230;.<\/h3>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>With the financial crisis in full swing at the end of 2008, tax  equity markets\u00a0dried up and developers couldn&#8217;t get projects financed.  As a solution, ARRA directed the US Treasury to offer developers a cash  grant for projects equal to the previously utilized ITC. Using the cash  grant disqualifies a project from using the ITC, so this was not an new  incentive per se, just an new way of delivering the same incentive to  the developer. The policymakers&#8217; intent was to reassure developers that  they\u00a0could continue to\u00a0advance projects with full\u00a0confidence they could  secure project\u00a0financing.<\/p>\n<p>Because ARRA passed into law in early 2009, there&#8217;s a misperception  that the industry has had full use of the grants since then. However, it  actually took almost 9 months to get the grant program  operational&#8211;there were procedures to define, rules to clarify, forms to  create, websites to build, people to hire, etc.\u00a0The ironic thing is  that\u00a0while everyone waited to see how the program was going to work,  banks and developers put all project financings on hold. It just didn&#8217;t  make sense to\u00a0burn\u00a0legal expenses on\u00a0financing until it was clear  exactly how the stimulus grants would be made available.<\/p>\n<p>By October of 2009, the program rules were published and Treasury was  technically\u00a0open for business. However,\u00a0banks and developers were still  waiting\u00a0in the\u00a0starting blocks.\u00a0They weren&#8217;t ready to apply for grants,  <em>they were ready to start figuring out how to finance projects using  the grants.<\/em> At that point, they began pouring over the program  documents and forms to figure out the best way to finance a project  eligible for the grants.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, it really wasn&#8217;t until November\/December 2009\u00a0that  developers started to see financing term sheets begin to flow from banks  into the market. Let&#8217;s think through the timeline implications of this  for a typical solar project.\u00a0Term sheets can take several weeks or  months to get to signature. And getting from term sheet to financial  close typically takes\u00a0several more months. We&#8217;re just now closing the  first of our ARRA-related financings&#8211;and I suspect many other players  in the industry are on roughly similar timelines.<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s interesting is that even when a developer closes a financing,  they don&#8217;t\u00a0apply for the grant money&#8211;that doesn&#8217;t come until the end of  construction. Apply that insight across the entire industry and you  have a wave of\u00a0 ARRA-stimulated projects that are likely to apply for  funds mid-\u00a0to end-of year.<\/p>\n<p>This brings me to the most important point: just because the funds  aren&#8217;t flowing doesn&#8217;t mean the ARRA renewable energy grants\u00a0program\u00a0has  not been\u00a0effective. The very existence of the program has given banks  and developers confidence to proceed with projects that otherwise would  have been abandoned or mothballed. The flow of funds will become  apparent later as the projects become operational. The key indicator to  watch right now is NOT the flow of funds, it will be the flow of  financing and construction announcements that we should start seeing  with some frequency in the coming months.<\/p>\n<p>In closing, this is also why it is so important to extend the ARRA  grants program for another two years. The industry has just gotten out  of the starting blocks because of the delay in getting the grant\u00a0program  operational. Letting the program expire at the end of 2010 will  seriously undermine market confidence and disrupt project finance  markets just as they are emerging from the ruins of 2009. The US is  poised to become the leading market for solar and renewable energy&#8211;we  need to extend ARRA to ensure we make that dream come true.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/arnoharris.typepad.com\/cleanenergyfuture\/2010\/04\/big-misunderstandings-about-arra-stimulus-for-clean-energy.html\" >Link to original post<\/a><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/GreenEnergyReporter\/~4\/_QimxPprjtM\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Arno Harris, CEO of Recurrent Energy A few weeks ago I flagged a story in the Christian Science Monitor titled &#8220;Stimulus Funds for Clean Energy Largely Unspent&#8221; because I thought\u00a0it deserved a clarifying &#8216;blog post. The story repeats\u00a0several big misunderstandings about the\u00a0status of\u00a0renewable energy programs\u00a0included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2814,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-527171","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/527171","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2814"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=527171"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/527171\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=527171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=527171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=527171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}