{"id":529767,"date":"2010-04-16T11:28:28","date_gmt":"2010-04-16T15:28:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.reuters.com\/james-pethokoukis\/?p=3703"},"modified":"2010-04-16T11:28:28","modified_gmt":"2010-04-16T15:28:28","slug":"5-reasons-why-the-tea-partiers-are-right-on-taxes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/529767","title":{"rendered":"5 reasons why the Tea Partiers are right on taxes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the new Washington Consensus: American taxes must be raised  dramatically to deal with exploding federal debt since spending  can&#8217;t\/shouldn&#8217;t be cut. Only the rubes and radicals of the Tea Party and their <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecontract.org\/\">Contract from America<\/a> movement think otherwise. And don&#8217;t worry, the economy will be just  fine.<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t believe it. While you will never hear this in the  MSM, there is plenty of academic research supporting the idea that  cutting taxes and spending is the ideal economic recipe for growth, jobs incomes and  fiscal soundness. (This all assumes that America&#8217;s amazing turnaround since 1980 isn&#8217;t <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usnews.com\/money\/blogs\/capital-commerce\/2007\/11\/2\/americas-amazing-long-boom-turns-25.html\">proof enough<\/a>.) \u00a0Just take a look:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1) Tax cuts boost economic growth more than  increased government spending. Cutting spending is a better way to  reduce budget deficits than raising taxes.<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nber.org\/papers\/w15438.pdf?new_window=1\">&#8220;Large Changes in Fiscal Policy:  Taxes Versus Spending&#8221;<\/a> &#8212; Alberto Alesina and Silvia Ardagna, October  2009:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>We examine the evidence on episodes of large stances in  fiscal policy, both in cases of fiscal stimuli and in that of fiscal  adjustments in OECD countries from 1970 to 2007. Fiscal stimuli based  upon tax cuts are more likely to increase growth than those based upon  spending increases. As for fiscal adjustments, those based upon spending  cuts and no tax increases are more likely to reduce deficits and debt  over GDP ratios than those based upon tax increases. In addition,  adjustments on the spending side rather than on the tax side are less  likely to create recessions.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>2)   Tax cuts boost growth. Tax increases hurt growth, especially if used to finance increased government spending.<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nber.org\/papers\/w13264.pdf?new_window=1\">&#8220;The Macroeconomic  Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal  Shocks&#8221;<\/a> &#8212; Christina Romer and David H. Romer, July 2007:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>In  short, tax increases appear to have a very large, sustained, and highly  significant negative impact on output. Since most of our exogenous tax  changes are in fact reductions, the more intuitive way to express this  result is that tax cuts have very large and persistent positive output  effects. &#8230; The resulting estimates indicate that tax increases are  highly\u00a0contractionary. The effects are strongly significant, highly  robust, and much larger than those obtained using broader measures of  tax changes. The large effect stems in considerable part from a powerful  negative effect of tax increases on investment. We also find that  legislated tax increases designed to reduce a persistent budget deficit  appear to have much smaller output costs than other tax increases.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>3)  Cutting corporate taxes boosts growth.<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nber.org\/papers\/w13756\">&#8220;The Effect of Corporate Taxes  on Investment and Entrepreneurship<\/a>&#8221; &#8212; Simeon Djankov, Tim Ganser,  Caralee McLiesh, Rita Ramalho, Andrei Shleifer, January 2008:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>We  present new data on effective corporate income tax rates in 85  countries in 2004. The data come from a survey, conducted jointly with  PricewaterhouseCoopers, of all taxes imposed on &#8220;the same&#8221; standardized  mid-size domestic firm. In a cross-section of countries, our estimates  of the effective corporate tax rate have a large adverse impact on  aggregate investment, FDI, and entrepreneurial activity. For example, a  10 percent increase in the effective corporate tax rate reduces  aggregate investment to GDP ratio by 2 percentage points. Corporate tax  rates are also negatively correlated with growth, and positively  correlated with the size of the informal economy.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>4)  Tax rates are reaching dangerous levels where higher rates bring in  less money<\/strong>. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nber.org\/papers\/w15012\">&#8220;The Elasticity of Taxable Income with Respect to Marginal  Tax Rates&#8221;<\/a> &#8212; Emmanuel Saez, Joel Slemrod and Seth Giertz, May  2009:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Following the supply-side debates of the early 1980s, much  attention has been focused\u00a0on the revenue-maximizing tax rate. A top  tax rate above [X] is inefficient because decreasing the tax rate would  both increase the utility of the affected taxpayers with income above  [Y] and increase government revenue, which can in principle be used to  benefit other taxpayers. Using our previous example &#8230; the  revenue maximizing tax rate would be 55.6%, not\u00a0much higher than the  combined maximum federal, state, Medicare, and typical sales tax rate\u00a0in  the United States of 2008.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>5)  Cutting corporate taxes boosts wages.<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aei.org\/docLib\/20060706_TaxesandWages.pdf\">&#8220;Taxes and Wages&#8221;<\/a> &#8212; Kevin  Hassett and Aparna Mathur, June 2006:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Corporate taxes are significantly  related to wage rates across countries. Our\u00a0coefficient estimates are  large, ranging from 0.83 to almost 1-thus a 1 percent increase in\u00a0corporate  tax rates leads to an almost equivalent decrease in wage rates (in  percentage\u00a0terms).  &#8230; Higher corporate taxes lead to lower wages. A  1 percent increase in corporate\u00a0tax rates is associated with nearly a  1 percent drop in wage rates.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>There are plenty more, of course. The Tax Foundation lists<a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxfoundation.org\/publications\/show\/23489.html\"> a dozen recent studies <\/a>how harmful business taxes are to growth, jobs and wages. Economist <a href=\"http:\/\/gregmankiw.blogspot.com\/2010\/03\/taxes-per-person.html\">Greg Mankiw <\/a>has determined America is far from a low tax nation. More like in the middle. And let me add this from economist <a href=\"http:\/\/www.themoneyillusion.com\/?p=4626\">Scott Sumner<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>When I started studying economics the US was much richer than Western  Europe and Japan, but was also growing more slowly than other developed  countries.  They were still in the catch-up growth phase from the  ravages of WWII.  But since Reagan took office the US has been growing  faster than most other big developed economies, and at least as fast in  per capita terms.  They\u2019ve plateaued at about 25% below US levels, when  you adjust for PPP.  This is the steady state. \u00a0&#8230;\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Why is per capita GDP in Western Europe so much  lower than in the US?  Mankiw seems to imply that high tax rates may be  one of the reasons. &#8230; So I think Mankiw is saying that if we adopt the European model, there  really isn\u2019t a lot of evidence that we\u2019d end up with any more revenue  than we have right now. &#8230;\u00a0Of course the progressives\u2019  great hope is that we\u2019ll end up like France.  But Brazil also has high  tax rates, how do they know we won\u2019t end up like Brazil?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here is the new Washington Consensus: American taxes must be raised dramatically to deal with exploding federal debt since spending can&#8217;t\/shouldn&#8217;t be cut. Only the rubes and radicals of the Tea Party and their Contract from America movement think otherwise. And don&#8217;t worry, the economy will be just fine. Don&#8217;t believe it. While you will [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1063,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-529767","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/529767","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1063"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=529767"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/529767\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=529767"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=529767"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=529767"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}