{"id":531133,"date":"2010-04-16T14:33:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-16T18:33:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100414\/0650369011.shtml"},"modified":"2010-04-16T14:33:00","modified_gmt":"2010-04-16T18:33:00","slug":"frontier-communications-testing-to-see-how-users-respond-to-being-ridiculously-overcharged-for-bandwidth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/531133","title":{"rendered":"Frontier Communications &#8220;Testing&#8221; To See How Users Respond To Being Ridiculously Overcharged For Bandwidth"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last year Time Warner Cable took a pretty severe beating from the press and public for plans to impose not only monthly broadband usage caps as low as 5 GB a month, but also for their decision to charge users up to $2 per additional GB. Given this was a 1,500-2,000% markup above bandwidth costs for the provider,  most consumers realized that the already very profitable company was simply making a money grab &#8212; and preparing to better monetize and\/or stifle Internet video&#8217;s impact on TV revenues. The media scuff up wasn&#8217;t helped by company executives, who issued <a href=\"http:\/\/a.longreply.com\/101892\">missives<\/a> proclaiming that overcharging customers for bandwidth during a recession was only &quot;fair&quot; and that it would &quot;actually encourage more use of broadband overall.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>Time Warner Cable eventually <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20090416\/1608064529.shtml\">backed off<\/a> the plan, but not before their brand (which they&#8217;re planning to change) took a lot of damage. One small reason they backed off was because one of the company&#8217;s few competitors, Frontier Communications, started advertising their DSL service as uncapped in order to gain a competitive advantage. Despite the fact Frontier was previously planning to impose <strong>5GB monthly caps<\/strong> on all speed tiers &#8212; said ads <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dslreports.com\/r0\/download\/1536601~813805944aa0df17bdc51cd3c730b554\/frontier.jpg\">lambasted<\/a> the cable industry as greedy. Of course now that Time Warner Cable has backed off, Frontier is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dslreports.com\/shownews\/Frontier-Users-Facing-New-100-250-GB-Caps-107885\">testing an even more ridiculous overcharging system<\/a>.  <\/p>\n<p>According to a letter being sent to Frontier users in Minnesota, users who consume more than 100 GB a month are automatically having their bills bumped to $99 a month. Users who consume more than 250 GB a month are having their bills bumped to a staggering $250 a month. Users who don&#8217;t respond within fifteen days get their service disconnected (throwing away a potential customer is always a brilliant business model). Keep in mind that Frontier is one of many American telcos that &#8212; thanks to limited competition &#8212; hasn&#8217;t kept pace with demand or upgraded their network from last generation DSL technology in most markets. As such, many Frontier users don&#8217;t see speeds above 3 Mbps to begin with, and that service can cost around $55 a month for a standalone (no voice landline) connection. <\/p>\n<p>  As in most of these efforts to overcharge broadband users, the letter being sent to consumers adds insult to injury &#8212; informing users that the changes are being applied to provide &quot;the best possible internet experience.&quot; The letter also informs users that anyone who uses over 5 GB of bandwidth a month is engaging in &quot;unreasonable usage&quot; according to the Frontier terms of service. Of course 5 GB is eaten up by one high definition film &#8212; and as multi-user households use an ever-increasing array of services, 100 GB is quickly becoming a low ceiling as well.<\/p>\n<p>These more aggressive pricing models are only employed by carriers <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20090421\/1248354597.shtml\">who operate in uncompetitive markets<\/a> (Time Warner&#8217;s caps never appeared in markets where they competed with Verizon FiOS). While the pricing changes are almost always portrayed as an issue of &quot;fairness&quot; targeting a carrier&#8217;s heaviest users, the changes eventually wind up hitting all of an ISP&#8217;s subscribers. After these price hikes are portrayed as some sort of altruism, carriers will frequently try to trot out the argument that if they can&#8217;t overcharge you for bandwidth, the Internet will simply explode (aka the Exaflood), something we&#8217;ve <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20090511\/1811514836.shtml\">debunked countless times<\/a> as the product of carrier lobbyists. Of course all of this is going on while the cost of bandwidth and networking hardware drops. <\/p>\n<p>Frontier&#8217;s timing also isn&#8217;t particularly smart, given they&#8217;re exploring this overcharging scheme just as they&#8217;re trying to gain regulatory approval for their $8.5 billion plan to acquire millions of Verizon DSL and landline customers across fourteen states. Part of that deal involves a few thousand FiOS customers in Washington State, who&#8217;ll be thrilled to learn that their state-of-the-art fiber to the home connection is about to get much more expensive and much less useful. <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100414\/0650369011.shtml\">Permalink<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100414\/0650369011.shtml#comments\">Comments<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/article.php?sid=20100414\/0650369011&#038;op=sharethis\">Email This Story<\/a><br \/>\n <br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/click.phdo?s=fe576f7759fb7a60f3730ac2d60e2eca&#038;p=1\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" style=\"border: 0;\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/img.phdo?s=fe576f7759fb7a60f3730ac2d60e2eca&#038;p=1\"\/><\/a><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" height=\"0\" width=\"0\" border=\"0\" style=\"display:none\" src=\"http:\/\/ib.adnxs.com\/seg?add=24595&#038;t=2\"\/><\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.techdirt.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?a=5oCnjC25nwE:wdsEP1svnpU:D7DqB2pKExk\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?i=5oCnjC25nwE:wdsEP1svnpU:D7DqB2pKExk\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.techdirt.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?a=5oCnjC25nwE:wdsEP1svnpU:c-S6u7MTCTE\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?d=c-S6u7MTCTE\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/techdirt\/feed\/~4\/5oCnjC25nwE\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last year Time Warner Cable took a pretty severe beating from the press and public for plans to impose not only monthly broadband usage caps as low as 5 GB a month, but also for their decision to charge users up to $2 per additional GB. Given this was a 1,500-2,000% markup above bandwidth costs [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6723,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-531133","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/531133","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6723"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=531133"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/531133\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=531133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=531133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=531133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}