{"id":532572,"date":"2010-04-18T16:38:14","date_gmt":"2010-04-18T20:38:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/anthonyclarkarend.com\/?p=2269"},"modified":"2010-04-18T16:38:14","modified_gmt":"2010-04-18T20:38:14","slug":"an-%e2%80%9celitist%e2%80%9d-ivy-league-justice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/532572","title":{"rendered":"An \u201cElitist\u201d Ivy-League Justice?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"width: 235px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"John Marshall\" src=\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/f\/fe\/John_Marshall_by_Henry_Inman%2C_1832.jpg\/225px-John_Marshall_by_Henry_Inman%2C_1832.jpg\" alt=\"Chief Justice John Marshall-- he only went to William and Mary\" width=\"225\" height=\"279\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Chief Justice John Marshall&#8211; he only went to William and Mary<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>There is a very strange consensus developing relating to the next Supreme Court Justice nominee. As Andrew Romano <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.newsweek.com\/blogs\/thegaggle\/archive\/2010\/04\/16\/in-defense-of-ivy-league-justices.aspx\">reports over at the Newsweek blog: <\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Finally, Democrats and Republicans agree on <em>something<\/em>. Too bad it&#8217;s not something worth agreeing on.<\/p>\n<p>In Washington, D.C., a bipartisan consensus seems to be forming around the idea that President Obama should choose a judge without an Ivy League education to replace John Paul Stevens. Last Sunday, Bill Kristol&#8211;who went to Harvard (both undergrad and grad), married a fellow Harvard alum, and sent his son to Harvard&#8211;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2010\/04\/13\/supreme-court-nomination_n_535853.html\" >urged the president via FOX News<\/a> to select a non-Ivyite for the post, saying that &#8220;it would be good to have a nominee that stood up against powerfulinterests like the elite law schools, which&#8230; have done a lot of damage.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the Washington Post <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2010\/04\/13\/AR2010041303678.html\" >reported<\/a> a few days later that &#8220;many&#8221; Senate Democrats have a &#8220;particular preference&#8221; for &#8220;a nominee who comes from outside the usual background of Ivy League law schools.&#8221; As Chuck Schumer&#8211;Harvard College, Harvard Law&#8211;put it, &#8220;I&#8217;ve always liked someone with practical experience.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Read the rest of Romano&#8217;s piece to get his specific view on the issue, but let me just add a comment. (And in the interest of full disclosure, let me note that I never attended an Ivy-League school.)<\/p>\n<p>What troubles me is that this would-be consensus seems to be part of a general tend in American politics to reject anything that has the appearance of being elite. And while I believe it is proper to reject leaders or judges that are snobs or disconnected from reality or condescending or patronizing, I think that in our leadership&#8211; both political and judicial&#8211; seeking the &#8220;elite&#8221; is not a bad thing. While the word &#8220;elite&#8221; has come to be associated with snobs, <a href=\"http:\/\/dictionary.reference.com\/browse\/elite\">one of its core dictionary definitions<\/a> is <span> <\/span>&#8220;<strong>the choice or best of anything considered collectively, as of a group or class of persons<\/strong>.&#8221; Using this definition, don&#8217;t we want an elite surgeon to perform our neurosurgery? Don&#8217;t we want an elite group of commandos to rescue a person held hostage? In other words, don&#8217;t we want to try to get the best for our most challenging tasks? I don&#8217;t really care where the next Supreme Court Justice when to undergrad or law school, but I do want to try to get a person that would be among the best&#8211; among the elite.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/AnthonyClarkArend\/~4\/6meLo0s8xSg\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chief Justice John Marshall&#8211; he only went to William and Mary There is a very strange consensus developing relating to the next Supreme Court Justice nominee. As Andrew Romano reports over at the Newsweek blog: Finally, Democrats and Republicans agree on something. Too bad it&#8217;s not something worth agreeing on. In Washington, D.C., a bipartisan [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3977,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-532572","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/532572","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3977"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=532572"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/532572\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=532572"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=532572"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=532572"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}