{"id":533442,"date":"2010-04-18T23:01:15","date_gmt":"2010-04-19T03:01:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.personalliberty.com\/?p=12896"},"modified":"2010-04-18T23:01:15","modified_gmt":"2010-04-19T03:01:15","slug":"democrats-and-the-politics-of-envy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/533442","title":{"rendered":"Democrats And The Politics Of Envy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>(Part one of a  two-part series)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Democrats  have long practiced the politics of envy. They preach that their policies help  the working man (or woman) whereas the Republicans are the party of the rich.<\/p>\n<p>They  like to try and pit the poor against the rich. They promote the notion that if  someone earns more than whatever Democrats consider a \u201cliving wage\u201d (a  despicable term) then that person is somehow evil. And many Americans have  fallen for it.<\/p>\n<p>Well,  truth be told, both parties have done much more to benefit the rich than the  poor. Some of the reasons for that are <a href=\"http:\/\/www.personalliberty.com\/personal-liberty-articles\/what-drives-the-elected-class-money\/\">outlined here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>But  how Democrats have managed to maintain the myth that their policies are  beneficial to Average Working-class Joe (or Jane) is one of the great mysteries  of all time\u2014ranking up there with quasars and how Joe Besser ever became one of  the Three Stooges. For Democrat big-government policies have been devastating  to the \u201cworking\u201d man.<\/p>\n<p>Consider the  actions of the 28th President of the United States, Woodrow Wilson. With  the help of a Democrat-controlled Congress, Wilson established the Federal Reserve in 1913 and instituted an income tax which necessitated the  establishment of the Bureau of Internal Revenue\u2014the precursor to the Internal  Revenue Service (IRS).<\/p>\n<p>These agencies  began the stealth system of \u201clegal\u201d theft from the  American people and put us on a fiat paper money dollar system. This means that  all who earn dollars and save dollars have depreciating currency with  depreciating assets.<\/p>\n<p>This system hurts  the poor more than it does the rich. How? As the Federal Reserve prints more  and more money, the currency depreciates. Depreciating currency (inflation of  prices) slowly reduces the value of their savings and their standard of living.  The poor\u2014and the middle class\u2014who often find themselves living hand-to-mouth  see a rise in the prices of the things they buy. Since a greater portion of  their wealth is spent on living expenses, inflation affects the poor and middle  class far more than the rich.<\/p>\n<p>The purpose of fiat paper money is a tax on  the population which doesn\u2019t have to be collected or enforced. The state simply  has to inflate the currency by printing more paper money. The people are slow  to realize the sinister purpose of inflating the currency.<\/p>\n<p>Inflation or depreciation of the currency  is a monetary plague that attacks the spenders and the savers. Your wealth is  taken without a gun to your head.<\/p>\n<p>Writing in his  book, <em>End the Fed<\/em>, Ron Paul quotes  from data from the Federal Reserve of St. Louis that shows how money has  depreciated:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u201cOne  only needs to reflect on the dramatic decline in the value of the dollar that  has taken place since the Fed was established in 1913. The goods and services  you could buy for $1.00 in 1913 now cost nearly $21.00. Another way to look at  this is from the perspective of the purchasing power of the dollar itself. It  has fallen to less than $0.05 of its 1913 value. We might say that the  government and its banking cartel have together stolen $0.95 of every dollar as  they have pursued a relentlessly inflationary policy.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>That\u2019s the tax that  doesn\u2019t have to be collected. The one that is collected is just as insidious.<\/p>\n<p>According to U.S.  Census data, the average annual income in 1915 was $687. That year\u2014as in 1913  when the income tax was enacted\u2014there were just seven income tax brackets. The  marginal tax rate was 1 percent for people making up to $20,000. The highest  rate was 7 percent on income above $500,000.<\/p>\n<p>In 2008, according  to Leslie Carbone in her book, <em>Slaying  Leviathan, The Moral Case for Tax Reform<\/em>, a married couple filing jointly  paid 10 percent on the first $16,050 of their taxable income, 15 percent on the  remainder up to $65,100, 25 percent on the remainder up to $131,450, 28 percent  on the remainder up to $200,300, 33 percent on the remainder up to $357,700,  and 35 percent on the rest.<\/p>\n<p>That means that if  you work and you are one of the 53 percent of Americans who actually pay income  taxes, you spend somewhere between one to three hours each day working to pay  your tax burden.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Great Depression And The New Deal<\/strong><br \/>\nThe Roaring \u201820s  were arguably the most prosperous decade in American history, writes Robert P.  Murphy, Ph.D., in his book, <em>The  Politically Incorrect Guide\u2122 to The Great Depression and The New Deal.<\/em> It  wasn\u2019t just that people grew richer. Their lives changed with the growth in the  automobile and the spread of electricity and invention of gadgets and  appliances that ran off it.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the Fed  was flooding the credit markets with cheap money which led to a speculative  bubble that burst in 1929, according to Murphy. On Oct. 28, 1929, the stock  market lost almost 13 percent of its value. The next day saw a drop of almost  12 percent. The Great Depression was on.<\/p>\n<p>Unemployment  soared, surpassing 28 percent in March 1933. Annual production dropped 27  percent. Republican President Herbert Hoover\u2019s policies didn\u2019t help. Murphy  writes:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u201cThe  shocking unemployment rates of the Hoover  years were a direct, if unintended consequence of his high-wage policy. Hoover urged businesses to  maintain wage rates, even though profits were plummeting and prices in general  were dropping. With firms desperately trying to cut costs to stay afloat during  the Depression, Hoover  insisted that the relative price of labor <em>increase<\/em>.  It is no wonder then that this period witnessed the sharpest pullback in demand  for workers in American history. FDR continued these policies.\u201d [Emphasis in  original text]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Democrat Franklin  Delano Roosevelt, like Hoover  before him, thought the Depression was caused by underconsumption, according to  Murphy. So he sought to raise wage rates (rather than put a floor under them)  and he pushed industrial and labor policies through Congress that limited  competition and raised labor bargaining power.<\/p>\n<p>Murphy writes:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u201cOne  of these policies was the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) (1933-35).  This act created the National Recovery Administration (NRA), which provided a  vehicle for the major players in each industry to create a so-called \u2018Code of  Fair Competition.\u2019 In reality, these codes were <em>anti<\/em>-competitive rules that forbade industries from lowering  prices. In short, the NRA worked by fostering giant cartels, which made  products artificially expensive and punished small businesses trying to compete  against big businesses. As a condition for being allowed to form such a cartel,  Roosevelt insisted that each participating  \u2018industry [raise] wages and [accept] collective bargaining with an independent  union.\u2019 By 1934, over 500 industries had adopted such codes, covering almost 80  percent of private, nonfarm employment. With these \u2018voluntary\u2019 codes in place,  big producers could raise prices without fear of losing market share, because  the federal government itself would punish any \u2018unpatriotic\u2019 upstarts who dared  try to undersell large firms.\u201d [Emphasis in original text]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>With small  businesses unable to set their own prices lower, not only were they unable to  compete with larger business, but poor and middle-class citizens were unable to  shop around for a good price or purchase as much as they needed.<\/p>\n<p>In 1935 the Supreme  Court threw out the NIRA as unconstitutional so Roosevelt  used the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) to achieve his goals, according to  Murphy. The NLRA granted unions incredible bargaining power by forcing  businesses to accept collective bargaining. As a result, union membership more  than doubled and the number of \u201cstrike days\u201d doubled in one year\u2014from 14  million in 1936 to 28 million in 1937. This surge in union strength\u2014and the  high wages it brought\u2014was an important factor in the persistently high  unemployment rates of the 1930s. In other words, FDR\u2019s pro-union policies  helped prevent people from finding jobs.<\/p>\n<p>Other \u201chighlights\u201d  of FDR\u2019s policies that hurt the poor and middle class*:<\/p>\n<ul type=\"disc\">\n<li>The four-day banking holiday       closed all banks\u2014even those that were sound\u2014denying depositors access to       their own money. It was mostly small regional banks that failed and they       did so mostly because of government intervention in the banking system.       The \u201csolution\u201d did not correct the fundamental problems with the banks,       but instead took away bank clients\u2019 incentives to monitor bank solvency by       saddling taxpayers with losses.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul type=\"disc\">\n<li>The executive order requiring       American citizens to surrender all gold certificates and gold, except for       rare gold coins, in exchange for Federal Reserve Notes was outright theft.       The government compounded the problem when it tied the dollar back to       gold\u2014changing the exchange rate from $20.67 per ounce to $35 per ounce (a       40 percent depreciation).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul type=\"disc\">\n<li>Under government coercion,       sellers destroyed food in order to raise prices (as depicted in scenes       from John Steinbeck\u2019s <em>Grapes of       Wrath<\/em>). While hundreds of thousands of poor and unemployed people went       hungry, farmers were plowing their crops under, or leaving them to rot in       the field, and slaughtering livestock to comply with the Agriculture       Adjustment Act. \u201c[While Agriculture Secretary Henry A.] Wallace was paying       out hundreds of millions to kill hogs, burn oats, plow under cotton, the       Department of Agriculture issued a bulletin telling the nation that the       great problems of our time was our failure to produce enough food.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul type=\"disc\">\n<li>The Works Process Administration       (WPA) hampered the economic recovery. By giving the unemployed an option       that paid well enough, the WPA siphoned workers away from truly productive       tasks that would have restored the economy to a long-run sustainable       condition. In other words, the government paid them not to find a job.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>There are many New  Deal programs that still exist to this day, though few of them really help the  \u201cworking man.\u201d One of the worst is Social Security. In <em>Slaying Leviathan<\/em>, Carbone writes:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u201cFormer  Social Security Commissioner Stanford Ross criticized the founders of Social  Security for generating public support by advancing the fictitious belief that  a worker \u2018pays for\u2019 benefits with \u2018contributions\u2019 rather than taxes, and has an  \u2018earned right\u2019 to particular benefits. Ross advised Americans to reject the  \u2018myth\u2019 that Social Security is a pension plan and accept it as a tax on workers  to provide for the \u2018vulnerable in our society\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSenator  Patrick Moynihan went further, calling Social Security taxes \u2018outright  thievery\u2019 from young working people.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>All in all,  Democrat policies during the first half of the 20th Century did much  more to hurt the working poor or middle class than to help. This is not to  absolve Republicans of responsibility. They were complicit in that they didn\u2019t  do enough to try and stop the practices before they were implemented, nor have  they done much to try and repeal them. Republicans like big government as much  as the Democrats.<\/p>\n<p>The fallacy is that  either party, the Democrats in particular, have been able to position  themselves as the party of the \u201cworking\u201d man.<\/p>\n<p>* From <em>The Politically Incorrect Guide\u2122 to The  Great Depression and the New Deal<\/em>, by Robert P. Murphy, Ph.D.<\/p>\n<p>(<strong>Editor\u2019s Note:<\/strong> This is the first of a two-part series on Democrat  big government policies and how they hurt the people they are supposed to help.  Next week will focus on Lyndon Baines Johnson\u2019s Great Society and the policies  of Barack Hussein Obama, including Obamacare and the coming value-added tax.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Part one of a two-part series) Democrats have long practiced the politics of envy. They preach that their policies help the working man (or woman) whereas the Republicans are the party of the rich. They like to try and pit the poor against the rich. They promote the notion that if someone earns more than [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5330,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-533442","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/533442","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5330"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=533442"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/533442\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=533442"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=533442"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=533442"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}