{"id":535318,"date":"2010-04-20T10:11:04","date_gmt":"2010-04-20T14:11:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com\/?p=16882"},"modified":"2010-04-20T10:11:04","modified_gmt":"2010-04-20T14:11:04","slug":"court-animal-cruelty-image-law-too-broad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/535318","title":{"rendered":"Court: Animal Cruelty Image Law Too Broad"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In an 8-1 opinion from Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court has upheld a lower court ruling striking down a federal law that bans images of animal cruelty. The Court&#8217;s opinion says the law is &#8220;substantially overbroad, and therefore unvalid under the First Amendment.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>From the Opinion:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;While the prohibition of animal cruelty has a long history in American law, there is no evidence of a similar tradition prohibiting depictions of such cruelty.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>CJ Roberts says the law which made it a crime to create, sale, possess depictions of animal cruelty including dog fighting and &#8220;crush&#8221; videos &#8220;creates a criminal prohibition of alarming breadth.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Today&#8217;s ruling is a huge victory for First Amendment advocates. To that end Chief Justice Roberts says the First Amendment &#8220;reflects a judgment by the American people that the benefits of its restrictions on the Government outweigh the costs.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Justice Samuel Alito was the only dissenter.<\/p>\n<p>Alito says today&#8217;s ruling &#8220;has the practical effect of legalizing the sale of such videos and is thus likely to spur a resumption of their production&#8230;.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/politics\/2009\/10\/06\/supreme-court-weighs-free-speech-dog-fighting-case\/\">Click Here\u00a0for a background article on the case.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In an 8-1 opinion from Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court has upheld a lower court ruling striking down a federal law that bans images of animal cruelty. The Court&#8217;s opinion says the law is &#8220;substantially overbroad, and therefore unvalid under the First Amendment.&#8221; From the Opinion: &#8220;While the prohibition of animal cruelty has [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5152,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-535318","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/535318","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5152"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=535318"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/535318\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=535318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=535318"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=535318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}