{"id":535953,"date":"2010-04-20T20:16:11","date_gmt":"2010-04-21T00:16:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/?p=23306"},"modified":"2010-04-20T20:16:11","modified_gmt":"2010-04-21T00:16:11","slug":"the-great-global-warming-blunder-roy-spencer-asserts-and-morano-parrots-%e2%80%9ci-predict-that-the-proposed-cure-for-global-warming-%e2%80%93-reducing-greenhouse-gas-emissions-%e2%80%93-will-som","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/535953","title":{"rendered":"The Great Global Warming Blunder:  Roy Spencer asserts (and Morano parrots), \u201cI predict that the proposed cure for global warming \u2013 reducing greenhouse gas emissions \u2013 will someday seem as outdated as using leeches to cure human illnesses.\u201d &#8211; Uhh, guys, doctors still use medicinal leeches!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Few folks have been as wrong about climate science as <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2009\/04\/07\/swift-boat-smearer-marc-morano-global-warming-denie\/\">Marc  Morano<\/a> and Dr. Roy Spencer<a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2009\/04\/07\/swift-boat-smearer-marc-morano-global-warming-denie\/\"><\/a>.\u00a0 So it&#8217;s no big surprise to see this laughable screaming headline on ClimateDepotted:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/ClimateDepot.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-23307\" title=\"ClimateDepot\" src=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/ClimateDepot.gif\" alt=\"ClimateDepot\" width=\"600\" height=\"224\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Morano apparently couldn&#8217;t spend 30 seconds on Google to find the link to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.drroyspencer.com\/2010\/04\/the-great-global-warming-blunder-how-mother-nature-fooled-the-world%E2%80%99s-top-climate-scientists\/\">Spencer&#8217;s post on his new memoir<\/a>, <em>The Great Global Warming Blunder: How Mother Nature Fooled the Climate Scientist who Wrote this Book<\/em>.\u00a0 [Okay, I may have changed the subtitle a little bit, but it&#8217;s Spencer who insists on using unintentionally ironic titles for his novels, like <em>Climate Confusion<\/em>.]<\/p>\n<p>For those who don&#8217;t follow the professional disinformers closely, Spencer (and John Christy) famously made a bunch of analytical blunders and spent years pushing the now long-overturned notion that the satellite data didn&#8217;t show significant warming (see &#8220;<a title=\"Permanent Link to Should you believe anything  John Christy and Roy Spencer say?\" rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2008\/05\/22\/should-you-believe-anything-john-christy-or-roy-spencer-say\/\">Should you believe anything John  Christy and Roy Spencer say?<\/a>&#8220;).\u00a0 Now Spencer is claiming that &#8220;<strong>When properly interpreted<\/strong>, our satellite observations actually reveal&#8221; that the climate system is insensitive to carbon dioxide.\u00a0 Yes, well, he has the secret recipe for properly mis-interpreting satellite data.<\/p>\n<p>But it&#8217;s the leeches stuff that shows he also can&#8217;t even be bothered to spend 30 seconds using Google to check his own analogies.\u00a0 Here&#8217;s the screen capture before he edits it:<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-23306\"><\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/Spencer-post.gif\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-23310\" title=\"Spencer post\" src=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/Spencer-post.gif\" alt=\"Spencer post\" width=\"450\" height=\"572\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>So many whoppers, so little time.\u00a0 First, of course, it is simply basic physics that carbon dioxide traps heat &#8212; that&#8217;s why they call it a greenhouse gas (see, for instance, <a title=\"Permanent Link to Why solar energy trumps coal  power:  Exclusive new Caldeira analysis explains \u201cthe burning of organic  carbon warms the Earth about 100,000 times more from climate effects  than it does through the release of chemical energy in combustion.\u201d\" rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2009\/11\/11\/solar-energy-trumps-coal-caldeira-study\/\">Exclusive  new analysis by climatologist Ken Caldeira explains \u201cthe burning of organic carbon warms the  Earth about 100,000 times more from climate effects than it does  through the release of chemical energy in combustion\u201d<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>Second, that human activity is responsible for most (if not essentially all) recent warming is also pretty straightforward physics (see &#8220;<a title=\"Permanent Link to What percentage of global  warming is due to human causes vs. natural causes?\" rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2009\/12\/02\/realclimate-gavin-schmidit-what-fraction-of-global-warming-is-due-to-human-causes-vs-natural-causes\/\">What percentage of  global warming is due to human causes vs. natural causes?<\/a>&#8220;).\u00a0 If you want to understand why scientists are so certain that CO2 is  such a big driver of our climate, you should watch <a title=\"Permanent  Link to In must-see AGU video, Richard Alley explains \u201cThe Biggest  Control Knob: Carbon Dioxide in Earth\u2019s Climate History\u201d\" rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2009\/12\/21\/agu-richard-alley-explains-biggest-control-knob-carbon-dioxide-in-earths-climate-history\/\">Richard  Alley\u2019s lively talk<\/a><a title=\"Permanent Link to In must-see AGU  video, Richard Alley explains \u201cThe Biggest Control Knob: Carbon Dioxide  in Earth\u2019s Climate History\u201d\" rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2009\/12\/21\/agu-richard-alley-explains-biggest-control-knob-carbon-dioxide-in-earths-climate-history\/\"> AGU video, explains \u201cThe Biggest Control Knob: Carbon Dioxide in  Earth\u2019s Climate History.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Third, to falsify basic climate physics you can&#8217;t just float your own unproven idea &#8212; you would actually have to come up with a mechanism that would negate the well-understood warming from all that carbon dioxide.\u00a0 Good luck.<\/p>\n<p>Fourth, the analogy to leeches, of course, shows how little effort Spencer puts into checking what he writes.\u00a0 I actually thought it was pretty well known that people are still using medicinal leeches.\u00a0\u00a0 Google will quickly lead you to a bunch of popular articles and peer-reviewed medical studies.\u00a0 Here&#8217;s the &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/European_Medical_Leech\">European medical leech<\/a>&#8221; entry in Wikipedia:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>Medicinal leeches are now making a comeback in microsurgery.  They provide an effective means to reduce blood coagulation,  relieve venous pressure from pooling blood (<em>venous insufficiency<\/em>),  and in reconstructive surgery to stimulate  circulation in reattachment operations for organs with critical blood  flow, such as eye lids, fingers, and ears.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Doh!<\/p>\n<p>It is downright bizarre that both Morano and Spencer are proud of an analogy that is so anti-scientific on both ends it actually makes the exact opposite point from the one they are trying to make.<\/p>\n<p>Fifth, and this is a truly egregious whopper, Spencer argues that because &#8220;nature is gobbling up 50% of what humanity produces&#8221; it is somehow &#8220;logical&#8221; that &#8220;nature \u2014 that life on Earth \u2014 has actually been starved for carbon  dioxide.&#8221;\u00a0 Presumably by &#8220;nature&#8221; he means natural land and ocean sinks (as opposed to the atmosphere).\u00a0 Yet he is way too clever a guy to be unaware of the fact that &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.globalcarbonproject.org\/carbonbudget\/08\/hl-full.htm#naturalSinks\">The global oceanic sink  removed 26% of all CO<sub>2<\/sub> emissions for the period 2000-2008<\/a>.&#8221;\u00a0 In short, of the CO2 which Spencer asserts &#8220;nature \u2014 that life on Earth&#8221; is &#8220;gobbling up,&#8221;<strong> half is going into the ocean and acidifying it, helping to render it inhospitable to marine life<\/strong> (see discussion at <a title=\"Permanent Link to Nature Geoscience study:   Oceans are acidifying 10 times faster today than 55 million years ago  when a mass extinction of marine species occurred\" rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/02\/18\/ocean-acidification-study-mass-extinction-of-marine-life-nature-geoscience\/\"><em>Nature Geoscience<\/em> study:  Oceans are acidifying 10 times faster today than 55 million  years ago when a mass extinction of marine species occurred<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>So Spencer is blatantly misrepresenting the most basic understanding we have of the &#8220;natural&#8221; CO2 sinks.\u00a0 There is little doubt that the staggering amounts of CO2 we are pouring into the air aren&#8217;t our &#8220;friend&#8221; &#8212; especially if we listen to Spencer and his fellow disinformers and keep doing nothing to restrict emissions.<\/p>\n<p>Caldeira has made exquisitely clear that &#8220;carbon dioxide is the right villain.&#8221;\u00a0 He <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2009\/10\/12\/superfreakonomics-errors-levitt-caldeira-myhrvold\/\">says<\/a>, &#8220;I compare CO2 emissions to mugging little old ladies&#8230;.\u00a0 Carbon dioxide emissions represent a real threat to humans and natural  systems.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>As for Spencer, he keeps getting debunked as fast as he can print his global warming blunders.\u00a0 Back in 2008, I <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2008\/05\/22\/should-you-believe-anything-john-christy-or-roy-spencer-say\/\">wrote<\/a> about RealClimate&#8217;s multiple takedowns.\u00a0 RC utterly skewered one Spencer dis-analysis \u2014  misanalysis  doesn\u2019t seem a strong enough word for what he did (see  RC\u2019s \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2008\/05\/how-to-cook-a-graph-in-three-easy-lessons\/langswitch_lang\/in\">How   to cook a graph in three easy lessons<\/a>\u201c).   RC calls it \u201cshameless   cookery.\u201d  If you like semi-technical discussions, then I strongly   recommend the post.<\/p>\n<p>Spencer of course was wrong \u2014 dead wrong \u2014 for a very long time, which created one of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.skepticalscience.com\/satellite-measurements-warming-troposphere.htm\">the  most enduring denier myths, that the satellite data didn\u2019t show the  global warming that the surface temperature data did<\/a>.  As  RealClimate explained:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>We now know, of course, that the satellite data set <a href=\"http:\/\/www.remss.com\/msu\/msu_browse.html\"> confirms that the  climate is warming <\/a>, and indeed at very nearly the same rate as  indicated by the surface temperature records. Now, there\u2019s nothing wrong  with making mistakes when pursuing an innovative observational method,  but Spencer and Christy sat by for most of a decade allowing \u2014 indeed  encouraging \u2014 the use of their data set as an icon for global warming  skeptics. They committed serial errors in the data analysis, but  insisted they were right and models and thermometers were wrong. They  did little or nothing to root out possible sources of errors, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclimate.org\/index.php\/archives\/2005\/08\/et-tu-lt\/\">left  it to others<\/a> to clean up the mess, as has now been done.<\/p>\n<p>So after that history, we\u2019re supposed to savor all Roy\u2019s new cookery?<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s an awful lot to swallow.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Amazingly (or not), the \u201cserial errors in the data analysis\u201d all  pushed the (mis)analysis in the same, wrong direction.  Coincidence?   You decide.  But I find it hilarious that the deniers and delayers still  quote Christy\/Spencer\/UAH analysis lovingly,  but to this day dismiss  the \u201chockey stick\u201d and anything climatologist Michael Mann writes, when his analysis  was in fact <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/02\/26\/michael-mann-false-and-misleading-claims-wall-street-journal-oversimplify-piece-by-jeffrey-ball-and-keith-johnson\/\">vindicated<\/a> by the august National Academy of Sciences in  2006 and subsequent independent research.<\/p>\n<p>Michael Mann himself recently <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/02\/26\/michael-mann-false-and-misleading-claims-wall-street-journal-oversimplify-piece-by-jeffrey-ball-and-keith-johnson\/\">wrote<\/a> of Christy and Spencer:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>A few years ago, independent teams of scientists got a hold of their  satellite data and after repeated questioning of them about their  methods found that there were two critical errors in their algorithm.\u00a0 <strong> One of them was a sign error in the diurnal correction term, the other  was an algebraic error. <\/strong>Once those errors were corrected by other scientists, the Christy and  Spencer claim that satellite data contradict surface evidence of warming  evaporated.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Once some serious climatologists look at Spencer&#8217;s latest work, it will no doubt turn out to be another great global warming blunder.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Few folks have been as wrong about climate science as Marc Morano and Dr. Roy Spencer.\u00a0 So it&#8217;s no big surprise to see this laughable screaming headline on ClimateDepotted: Morano apparently couldn&#8217;t spend 30 seconds on Google to find the link to Spencer&#8217;s post on his new memoir, The Great Global Warming Blunder: How Mother [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":687,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-535953","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/535953","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/687"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=535953"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/535953\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=535953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=535953"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=535953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}