{"id":542085,"date":"2010-04-22T09:45:55","date_gmt":"2010-04-22T13:45:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.grist.org\/article\/straight-up-what-to-look-for-in-the-bipartisan-climate-and-clean-energy-job\/"},"modified":"2010-04-22T09:45:55","modified_gmt":"2010-04-22T13:45:55","slug":"what-to-look-for-in-the-bipartisan-climate-and-clean-energy-jobs-bill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/542085","title":{"rendered":"What to look for in the bipartisan climate and clean energy jobs bill"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t\t\t\tby Joseph Romm <\/p>\n<p>On Monday, Sens. Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.), John Kerry (D-Mass.), and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) will launch their bipartisan climate and clean energy jobs bill.&nbsp; I&rsquo;m quite certain there will be something in it to dissatisfy everyone.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, has Congress ever passed a significant bill that didn&rsquo;t dissatisfy everyone, particularly on the environment?&nbsp; We haven&rsquo;t had a major piece of clean-air legislation for almost exactly two decades now.&nbsp; The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/air\/caa\/overview.txt\" style=\"color: #339966;\">EPA history here<\/a>), which ultimately passed by large margins, put in place a cap-and-trade system for acid rain pollution, but didn&rsquo;t end the grandfathering of old coal plants.&nbsp; And so they burn on.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><strong>No bill that could pass Congress right now or in the immediate future would be sufficient to put us on the path to stabilizing the world at 2&deg;C.<\/strong>&nbsp;We simply aren&rsquo;t sufficiently desperate to do what is needed, which is&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2009\/03\/26\/full-global-warming-solution-350-450-ppm-technologies-efficiency-renewables\/\" style=\"color: #339966;\">nonstop deployment of a staggering amount of low-carbon energy, including efficiency, for the rest of the century<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>And so my criteria for judging the bill focuses on whether it will create the conditions that will allow more desperate policy makers in the not-too-distant future to have a realistic chance of getting on the necessary path.&nbsp; My new book&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.powells.com\/biblio\/1597267163?&amp;PID=25450\">Straight Up<\/a>&nbsp;includes one&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2009\/06\/26\/house-approves-landmark-bipartisan-clean-energy-and-climate-bill-final-vote-waxman-markey\/\" style=\"color: #339966;\">essay<\/a>&nbsp;on the House&rsquo;s astonishing yet dissatisfying achievement in passing the Waxman-Markey bill.&nbsp; It explains that when we are that desperate, probably in the 2020s, we&rsquo;ll want to already have:<\/p>\n<p>substantially dropped below the business-as-usual emissions path<br \/>\nstarted every major business planning for much deeper reductions<br \/>\ngoosed the cleantech venture and financing community<br \/>\nput in place the entire framework for U.S. climate regulations<br \/>\naccelerated many tens of gigawatts of different types of low-carbon energy into the marketplace<br \/>\nput billions into developing advanced low-carbon technology<br \/>\nstarted building out the smart, green grid of the 21st century<br \/>\ntrained and created millions of clean energy jobs<br \/>\nnegotiated a working international climate regime<br \/>\nbrought China into the process<\/p>\n<p>Waxman-Markey, had it become the law of the land, would have achieved all of those vital goals.&nbsp; And that&rsquo;s why I strongly supported it, even though its 2020 target and use of offsets meant that it was, from a purely scientific perspective, unsatisfactory.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>The Senate bill will no doubt be weaker than the House bill, but my criteria remain the same.&nbsp; There is one other criterion that many people, including me, feel is important:&nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>Does the bill finally start shutting down the grandfathered coal plants&mdash;the dirtiest of the dirty?&nbsp;<\/strong>The answer to that question for the House bill was &ldquo;Hell yes.&rdquo;&nbsp; What will it be for the Senate bill?&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Related Links:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.grist.org\/article\/2010-04-23-federal-climate-policy-should-preempt-state-regional-initiatives\/\">Federal climate policy should preempt state and regional initiatives<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.grist.org\/article\/2010-04-23-astute-climate-bill-analysis-from-dj-biz-markie\/\">Astute climate bill analysis from DJ Biz Markie<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.grist.org\/article\/2010-04-20-raiding-rainforest-funds-in-climate-legislation-will-turn-cost-p\/\">Raiding rainforest funds in climate legislation will turn cost projections into fantasy<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t<br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/click.phdo?s=78443d8ec26fb6eb69a700a1732c7e75&#038;p=1\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" style=\"border: 0;\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/img.phdo?s=78443d8ec26fb6eb69a700a1732c7e75&#038;p=1\"\/><\/a><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" height=\"0\" width=\"0\" border=\"0\" style=\"display:none\" src=\"http:\/\/ib.adnxs.com\/seg?add=24595&#038;t=2\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Joseph Romm On Monday, Sens. Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.), John Kerry (D-Mass.), and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) will launch their bipartisan climate and clean energy jobs bill.&nbsp; I&rsquo;m quite certain there will be something in it to dissatisfy everyone. On the other hand, has Congress ever passed a significant bill that didn&rsquo;t dissatisfy everyone, particularly on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":765,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-542085","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/542085","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/765"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=542085"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/542085\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=542085"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=542085"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=542085"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}