{"id":542889,"date":"2010-04-25T12:07:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-25T16:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.autoblog.com\/2010\/04\/25\/report-f1-turbine-engine-proposal-being-analyzed-by-fia\/"},"modified":"2010-04-25T12:07:00","modified_gmt":"2010-04-25T16:07:00","slug":"report-f1-turbine-engine-proposal-being-analyzed-by-fia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/542889","title":{"rendered":"Report: F1 turbine engine proposal being analyzed by FIA?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Filed under: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.autoblog.com\/category\/motorsports\/\" rel=\"tag\">Motorsports<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.pitpass.com\/fes_php\/pitpass_news_item.php?fes_art_id=40589\"><img decoding=\"async\" vspace=\"4\" hspace=\"0\" border=\"1\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/www.blogcdn.com\/www.autoblog.com\/media\/2010\/04\/spyker-f16.jpg\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Think F1 racers are more like fighter jets than cars? You&#8217;re not far off. Both F1 cars and jets are made primarily of lightweight composites, travel at ludicrous speeds, generate unfathomable <em>G<\/em>s of force, have single-seat cockpits, cost millions of dollars, and are developed (and operated) by more engineers than a train yard full of locomotives. And the similarities could be getting even closer if the latest reports are anything to go by.<\/p>\n<p>After recently reporting on a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.autoblog.com\/2010\/04\/15\/report-formula-one-considering-1-5-liter-turbo-engines\/\">potential shift to small-displacement turbocharged engines<\/a> in the sport, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pitpass.com\/fes_php\/pitpass_news_item.php?fes_art_id=40589\">Pitpass.com says<\/a> that a proposal on allowing the use of gas turbine engines is now being looked at by the FIA. The proposal was reportedly submitted by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.autoblog.com\/tag\/project1221\">Project 1221<\/a>, which says it could supply teams with race-ready turbines as soon as 2013 if the FIA were to give it the nod. F1 fanatics may recall that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.autoblog.com\/make\/lotus\">Lotus<\/a> toyed with turbine power back in the 1970s, but never scored a better finish than eighth place at the 1971 Italian Grand Prix before giving up on the project.<\/p>\n<p>The incorporation of turbines would bring several benefits while requiring significant re-adjustments to the current formula. Although turbines use more fuel, they require far less maintenance than a conventional internal-combustion engine &#8211; especially the highly-stressed units made for F1. Turbines can run on biofuels, allowing F1 to take a step forward as a &#8220;green&#8221; leader in motorsports. Since turbines cannot, however, be used as a stressed member of a car&#8217;s chassis construction &#8211; another innovation pioneered, somewhat ironically, by Lotus &#8211; teams employing turbine power would have to switch to a space frame chassis design. Any drawbacks would be offset by the turbine&#8217;s smaller form. <\/p>\n<p>Though many teams &#8211; complete-package constructors like <a href=\"http:\/\/www.autoblog.com\/make\/ferrari\">Ferrari<\/a> especially &#8211; would be hesitant to adopt turbine propulsion, one could easily imagine independents like Red Bull (to say nothing of the reborn Lotus team) jumping at the opportunity. A level playing field would have to be established through equalization regulations with conventional engines, but the people behind Project 1221 say that limiting their turbines&#8217; output would be relatively straightforward, opening the door to multiple engine types in the series. That&#8217;s if this idea ever moves anywhere beyond the proposal stage &#8212; a pretty big &#8220;if&#8221; at that. <\/p>\n<p>[Source: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pitpass.com\/fes_php\/pitpass_news_item.php?fes_art_id=40589\">Pitpass<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.autoblog.com\/2010\/04\/25\/report-f1-turbine-engine-proposal-being-analyzed-by-fia\/\">Report: F1 turbine engine proposal being analyzed by FIA?<\/a> originally appeared on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.autoblog.com\">Autoblog<\/a> on Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href=\"http:\/\/www.weblogsinc.com\/feed-terms\/\">terms for use of feeds<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h6 style=\"clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;\"><\/h6>\n<p><a href=http:\/\/www.pitpass.com\/fes_php\/pitpass_news_item.php?fes_art_id=40589>Read<\/a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.autoblog.com\/2010\/04\/25\/report-f1-turbine-engine-proposal-being-analyzed-by-fia\/\" rel=\"bookmark\" title=\"Permanent link to this entry\">Permalink<\/a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.autoblog.com\/forward\/19453171\/\" title=\"Send this entry to a friend via email\">Email this<\/a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.autoblog.com\/2010\/04\/25\/report-f1-turbine-engine-proposal-being-analyzed-by-fia\/#comments\" title=\"View reader comments on this entry\">Comments<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Filed under: Motorsports Think F1 racers are more like fighter jets than cars? You&#8217;re not far off. Both F1 cars and jets are made primarily of lightweight composites, travel at ludicrous speeds, generate unfathomable Gs of force, have single-seat cockpits, cost millions of dollars, and are developed (and operated) by more engineers than a train [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-542889","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/542889","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=542889"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/542889\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=542889"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=542889"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=542889"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}