{"id":545918,"date":"2010-04-28T09:05:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-28T13:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/henry-blodget-heres-the-most-distressing-part-of-aols-horrible-results-cash-flow-collapsed-2010-4"},"modified":"2010-04-28T09:05:00","modified_gmt":"2010-04-28T13:05:00","slug":"heres-the-most-distressing-part-of-aols-horrible-results-cash-flow-collapsed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/545918","title":{"rendered":"Here&#8217;s The Most Distressing Part Of AOL&#8217;s Horrible Results: Cash Flow Collapsed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"float_right\" src=\"http:\/\/static.businessinsider.com\/image\/4ab7a303e4150c491f2bab8d-400-299\/timarmstrongphonejpg.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"timarmstrongphone.jpg\" width=\"400\" height=\"299\" \/><\/p>\n<p>AOL had <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/aol-misses-on-earnings-ad-revenues-tank-another-19-2010-4\">another horrible quarter<\/a>, as expected.&nbsp; The good news is that the quarter wasn&#8217;t much MORE horrible than expected.&nbsp; In fact, on a revenue and EBITDA basis, it was basically in line.<\/p>\n<p>However&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>One metric that might slip under the radar but is nevertheless important is <strong>Free Cash Flow<\/strong>.&nbsp; Despite huge cost cuts, AOL&#8217;s Free Cash Flow tanked year over year&#8211;dropping a sickening 55% ($153 million).&nbsp; This compares a revenue drop of only 23%.<\/p>\n<p>Why did Free Cash Flow drop so much?<\/p>\n<p>In part because much of the revenue that AOL is losing is wildly profitable, while the revenue it&#8217;s keeping is low margin. Specifically, the high margin revenue AOL is losing is<strong> subscription revenue<\/strong>, which declined 28% ($90 million) year over year, and the <strong>search revenue, <\/strong>which fell 27%, or $45 million.<\/p>\n<p>Now, everyone knows AOL&#8217;s subscription revenue is collapsing.&nbsp; But what fewer people understand is that the <em><strong>subscription revenue and search revenue are tightly linked, and they are both vastly more profitable than AOL&#8217;s media and ad network business.<br \/><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>At first glance, the linkage between search and subscription revenue seems counterintuitive: As AOL focuses on growing its media properties, shouldn&#8217;t search revenue increase?&nbsp; In fact, the answer is &#8220;no.&#8221;&nbsp; Because as AOL <a href=\"http:\/\/finance.yahoo.com\/news\/AOL-Reports-Q1-bw-3455476051.html?x=0&amp;.v=1\">explains in its press release<\/a>, its subscribers search much more frequently than its free media readers.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>As the company loses those subscribers, therefore, it also loses big chunks of search revenue.&nbsp; And that search revenue is nearly 100% profit (because Google serves the ads).&nbsp; The subscription revenue, meanwhile, which is still composed largely of dial-up subscribers who rarely use dial-up, is also highly profitable.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s one of the<a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/henry-blodget-what-aol-wont-be-telling-ipo-investors-2009-10\"> hidden realities of AOL&#8217;s business<\/a>.&nbsp; And there&#8217;s not much the company can do about it.<\/p>\n<p>As the subscriber business continues to decline, more of the search revenue will disappear.&nbsp; It&#8217;s possible that Microsoft Bing will come in later this year and pay a silly amount of money for AOL&#8217;s remaining 3% of the search market, but even this won&#8217;t likely restore AOL&#8217;s search business to growth.&nbsp; So the outlook for cash flow is likely to remain worse than it is for revenue, even if AOL stabilizes its media business.<\/p>\n<p>On a positive note, AOL is finally starting to sell off non-core assets (ICQ).&nbsp; And it should be able to raise a reasonable amount of cash for doing so.<\/p>\n<p><strong>See Also:<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/henry-blodget-what-aol-wont-be-telling-ipo-investors-2009-10\">Here&#8217;s What AOL Isn&#8217;t Telling IPO Investors<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/henry-blodget-heres-the-most-distressing-part-of-aols-horrible-results-cash-flow-collapsed-2010-4#comments\">Join the conversation about this story &#187;<\/a><\/p>\n<p><b>See Also:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/henry-blodget-what-aol-wont-be-telling-ipo-investors-2009-10\">What AOL Won&#8217;t Be Telling IPO Investors<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/henry-blodget-aols-asset-sales-should-raise-another-1-billion-after-ipo-2009-12\">AOL&#8217;s Asset Sales Should Raise Another $1+ Billion Of Cash After IPO<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/aol-misses-on-earnings-ad-revenues-tank-another-19-2010-4\">AOL Misses On Earnings, Ad Revenues Tank Another 19%<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/TheMoneyGame\/~4\/I1WMrsuOf9o\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AOL had another horrible quarter, as expected.&nbsp; The good news is that the quarter wasn&#8217;t much MORE horrible than expected.&nbsp; In fact, on a revenue and EBITDA basis, it was basically in line. However&#8230; One metric that might slip under the radar but is nevertheless important is Free Cash Flow.&nbsp; Despite huge cost cuts, AOL&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-545918","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/545918","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=545918"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/545918\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=545918"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=545918"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=545918"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}