{"id":547278,"date":"2010-04-29T16:07:41","date_gmt":"2010-04-29T20:07:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/opiniojuris.org\/2010\/04\/29\/sorting-through-the-new-mil-coms-manual\/"},"modified":"2010-04-29T16:07:41","modified_gmt":"2010-04-29T20:07:41","slug":"sorting-through-the-new-mil-coms-manual","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/547278","title":{"rendered":"Sorting Through the New Mil Coms Manual"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em>by Deborah Pearlstein <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Still catching up on yesterday\u2019s news that DOD released the much-anticipated 2010 edition of the Manual for Military Commissions (MMC).  The Manual is <a  href=\"http:\/\/www.defense.gov\/news\/d2010manual.pdf\">here<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>Among its many provisions of interest (I\u2019m still skimming) are the rules set forth for prosecutions for the commission crime of material support for terrorism \u2013 a crime I and others have argued does not exist as a war crime under international law.  (None of the major international criminal tribunals have included it as an offense, for example; neither is there any evidence of its existence as a criminal offense under customary international law.) Given this, the singular international law defense for the inclusion of the \u201cmaterial support\u201d offense in the 2009 version of the Military Commissions Act I\u2019ve been able to imagine is the possibility that it would be used as some version of the expansive theory of vicarious contemplated at some level by the ICTY. (In my final international law class of the year, for example, I happened to teach <em>Furundzija <\/em>\u2013 a 1998 ICTY case finding that a soldier could be prosecuted under a vicarious liability theory for giving \u201cpractical assistance, encouragement, or moral support that had a substantial effect\u201d on the perpetration of a war crime committed, provided that the soldier had the requisite intent.  It\u2019s debatable what intent was in fact required in that case, but it was either knowledge that one\u2019s actions would assist perpetrator OR intent to facilitate the crime \u2013 hardly a meaningless difference.) One might have argued that the MCA offense of \u201cmaterial support\u201d could mitigate the international law problems if deployed, against odds, in this way. <\/p>\n<p>The MCA itself defines the offense as either (1) providing \u201cmaterial support\u201d (a term it defines) \u201cknowing or intending\u201d that it will be used \u201cin preparation for, or in carrying out, an act of terrorism,\u201d or (2) intentionally providing material support to an international terrorist organization engaged in hostilities against the United States if he knows that organization engages in terrorism.  By its terms, one might imagine option (1) was crafted to cover the bases in <em>Furundzija<\/em>; indeed \u201cmaterial support\u201d under the statute doesn\u2019t include something as vague as the \u201cmoral support\u201d <em>Furundzija <\/em>recognized (in a rape case), so perhaps in this respect an intent-based a prosecution could survive.  Option (2), on the other hand, seems less likely to survive <em>Furundzija\u2019s <\/em>more exacting intent requirement. It requires intent only as to the provision of money to the organization; it doesn\u2019t require that the supporter intend that the organization use the support to facilitate or carry out terrorism (only that the supporter have knowledge that the organization has ever engaged in such activities). <\/p>\n<p>So does the MMC provide clarification or cure? In a word \u2013 no.  It clarifies at least that the charging conduct must take place \u201cin the context of and \u2026 associated with hostilities.\u201d  This seems a sine qua non for a war crimes charge \u2013 it\u2019s not a war crime if there\u2019s not a war \u2013 that wasn\u2019t entirely clear by the terms of the statute itself.  On the other hand, the MMC preserves knowledge as a potential basis for prosecution for material support for an act of terrorism, and preserves knowledge as the singular basis for prosecution for support to a terrorist organization.  In other words, material support could still just be a knowledge-based offense.  If <em>Furundzija <\/em>is in fact the model, and if <em>Furundzija\u2019s <\/em>more exacting \u201cintent to facilitate\u201d standard applies, then no knowledge-based prosecution could survive.  Seems like yet another of many potential issues as these cases are brought and appealed.  In the meantime, I hope those international criminal law experts out there will tell me what I\u2019m getting wrong.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/opiniojurisfeed\/~4\/HzD4hUvwLqw\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Deborah Pearlstein Still catching up on yesterday\u2019s news that DOD released the much-anticipated 2010 edition of the Manual for Military Commissions (MMC). The Manual is here. Among its many provisions of interest (I\u2019m still skimming) are the rules set forth for prosecutions for the commission crime of material support for terrorism \u2013 a crime [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4905,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-547278","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/547278","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4905"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=547278"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/547278\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=547278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=547278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=547278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}