{"id":566828,"date":"2010-05-17T14:10:43","date_gmt":"2010-05-17T18:10:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/eias-energy-outlook-reveals-disturbing-figures-2010-5"},"modified":"2010-05-17T14:10:43","modified_gmt":"2010-05-17T18:10:43","slug":"why-the-eia%e2%80%99s-energy-outlook-for-2010-reveals-some-disturbing-figures","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/566828","title":{"rendered":"Why The EIA\u2019s Energy Outlook For 2010 Reveals Some Disturbing Figures"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Energy Information Administration just released their Annual  Energy Outlook for 2010: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eia.doe.gov\/oiaf\/aeo\/\">Annual  Energy Outlook 2010<\/a><\/p>\n<p>It is about 220 pages long, and therefore I haven&rsquo;t had a chance to  read it thoroughly. But in my skimming of it so far, there are a few  interesting items to note. One of the things I was most curious about  was whether they would show this scary graph that appeared in the 2009  Annual Energy Outlook:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/static.businessinsider.com\/image\/4bf185177f8b9ac863000b00\/eia-graph.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"eia graph\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Let that sink in for a just a minute. What that says is that global  production in 2030 is forecast to be 43 million barrels, demand is  forecast to be 105 million barrels, and we really don&rsquo;t have any idea  how we are going to cover 62 million barrels per day of demand by 2030.  We are going to need a lot of oil to cover the depletion, so it is up to  &ldquo;unidentified projects&rdquo; &ndash; or we will deal with huge shortages.<\/p>\n<p>Certainly there will be plenty of projects that haven&rsquo;t been  identified that will contribute to supply. But the key question is &ldquo;Will  those be enough?&rdquo; This is especially true in light of the current mess  in the Gulf of Mexico, because a lot of that new oil was expected to  come from offshore. But as I originally predicted, I think this blowout  in the gulf really slows things down. A relevant news story on that  theme from today:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/preview.bloomberg.com\/news\/2010-05-13\/bp-gulf-spill-delays-offshore-fields-holdings-billions-of-barrels-of-oil.html\">BP  Disaster Strands Billions of Barrels of Offshore U.S. Crude<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>A regulatory crackdown on offshore oil drilling after the fatal  rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico will delay development of U.S.  deposits with billions of barrels of crude and may spawn industry job  cuts.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>&ldquo;This oil spill was a disaster for the industry,&rdquo; said Gianna  Bern, president of Brookshire Advisory &amp; Research in Flossmoor,  Illinois, and a former BP crude trader. &ldquo;It will ratchet up public  debate on deep-water drilling by a couple of notches and put a lot of  projects conceivably on the back burner.&rdquo;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>So this would seem to make last year&rsquo;s graph even more ominous. But  alas, so far I have not found that graph in this year&rsquo;s report. In fact,  for the most part this year&rsquo;s report is pretty upbeat about future  prospects. It suggests that CTL, GTL, and BTL will start to make  significant contributions to global fuel supplies. It also suggests that  in the U.S. high oil prices will finally make oil shale economical.  This of course repeats the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerenergyreport.com\/2006\/06\/15\/%E2%80%9Coil-shale-development-imminent%E2%80%9D\/\">100-year-old  mantra about oil shale<\/a> being just around the corner.<\/p>\n<p>The report suggests that the 2022 cellulosic ethanol mandate will not  be met &ldquo;because economic and technological factors prevent cellulosic  biofuel production from providing the credits that would be needed to  meet the requirement.&rdquo; They do forecast that by 2035 we will have  figured it out and that &ldquo;ultimately surpasses the RFS requirement as  higher oil prices and lower production costs improve their  competitiveness.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Let me say that I have a lot of respect for the EIA, and use them  extensively for data. I know they put a lot of hard work into this  report. However, some of their predictions have become a running joke.  If you want to have some fun reading, go back and look at some of their  historical predictions from say, 2001. For instance, I always get a kick  out of this graph, which makes an annual appearance:<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/static.businessinsider.com\/image\/4bf185687f8b9a9219af0100\/eia-graph.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"eia graph\" \/><\/p>\n<p>It is always the same story. Sure, production has fallen in the U.S.  for the past 35+ years, but starting next year things are going to turn  around. You can see this same graph in every recent Energy Outlook. Then  production falls for another year, and they move the line forward and  forecast that the next year will be the turnaround year.<\/p>\n<p>One other graph of note concerns their projections for growth of CTL,  BTL, and oil shale.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/static.businessinsider.com\/image\/4bf1858b7f8b9a6e69770100\/eia-graph.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"eia graph\" \/><\/p>\n<p>I agree with them that there will be growth in CTL and BTL as  conventional oil depletes, but I am still skeptical about whether oil  can be produced from shale with a positive energy balance.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, lots of material to sort through, but I mainly wanted to call  attention to the report so people can begin to digest it.<\/p>\n<p><em>This is a guest by Robert Rapier from <a href=\"http:\/\/oilprice.com\/Energy\/Energy-General\/EIAs-Energy-Outlook-for-2010-Reveals-Disturbing-Figures.html\">R Squared Energy Blog<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/eias-energy-outlook-reveals-disturbing-figures-2010-5#comments\">Join the conversation about this story &#187;<\/a><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/TheMoneyGame\/~4\/fLZqoE99hZk\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Energy Information Administration just released their Annual Energy Outlook for 2010: Annual Energy Outlook 2010 It is about 220 pages long, and therefore I haven&rsquo;t had a chance to read it thoroughly. But in my skimming of it so far, there are a few interesting items to note. One of the things I was [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5864,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-566828","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/566828","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5864"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=566828"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/566828\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=566828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=566828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=566828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}