{"id":574716,"date":"2010-05-21T02:44:33","date_gmt":"2010-05-21T06:44:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/climaterealists.com\/index.php?id=5743"},"modified":"2010-05-21T02:44:33","modified_gmt":"2010-05-21T06:44:33","slug":"climate-science-strikes-back-by-doug-l-hoffman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/574716","title":{"rendered":"Climate Science Strikes Back by Doug L. Hoffman"},"content":{"rendered":"

Article Tags: Doug L. Hoffman<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Image
\nIf a letter appearing in the May 7, 2010, issue of Science is any indication, it looks like climate science traditionalists are trying to stage a comeback. The article by P. H. Gleick and a cast of hundreds, entitled \u201cClimate Change and the Integrity of Science,\u201d states that \u201cwe are deeply disturbed by the recent escalation of political assaults on scientists in general and on climate scientists in particular.\u201d Decrying the attacks on climate scientists by \u201cdeniers,\u201d the letter reiterates the signatories’ support for dogmatic climate change theory. While admitting that the IPCC \u201cquite unexpectedly and normally, made some mistakes,\u201d they call for an end to \u201cMcCarthy-like threats\u201d against themselves and their colleagues. Painting themselves as victims, they have gone on the offensive\u2014like the evil Empire of Star Wars fame, climate science is striking back.<\/p>\n

Likening climate change to the theories of the origin of Earth, Evolution and the Big Bang, the letter’s signatories state: \u201cThere is compelling, comprehensive, and consistent objective evidence that humans are changing the climate in ways that threaten our societies and the ecosystems on which we depend.\u201d They quickly play the uncertainty card<\/a>, repeating the tired better-safe-than-sorry argument, saying \u201cfor a problem as potentially catastrophic as climate change, taking no action poses a dangerous risk for our planet.\u201d Their song remains the same: we don’t have real proof but we should act anyway, just in case we are right. <\/p>\n

A foreshadowing of the letter’s credibility was the use of a now famous photoshopped picture of a single polar bear, stranded on a small ice-flow (clicking on the small picture at the begining of the article will bring up the bogus \u201ccollage\u201d). The Science article on-line contains this correction<\/a>: <\/p>\n

Due to an editorial error, the original image associated with this Letter was not a photograph but a collage. The image was selected by the editors, and it was a mistake to have used it. The original image has been replaced in the online HTML and PDF versions of the article with an unaltered photograph from National Geographic.<\/em>
\n
\nSource: theresilientearth.com<\/p>\n

Read in full with comments \u00bb<\/a>   <\/p>\n

<\/img><\/a>
\n<\/img><\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Article Tags: Doug L. Hoffman If a letter appearing in the May 7, 2010, issue of Science is any indication, it looks like climate science traditionalists are trying to stage a comeback. The article by P. H. Gleick and a cast of hundreds, entitled \u201cClimate Change and the Integrity of Science,\u201d states that \u201cwe are […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7070,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-574716","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/574716","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7070"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=574716"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/574716\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=574716"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=574716"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=574716"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}