{"id":575525,"date":"2010-05-19T20:44:42","date_gmt":"2010-05-20T00:44:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/opiniojuris.org\/?p=12469"},"modified":"2010-05-19T20:44:42","modified_gmt":"2010-05-20T00:44:42","slug":"keitner-takes-on-bradleygoldsmith-on-government-official-immunity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/575525","title":{"rendered":"Keitner Takes on Bradley\/Goldsmith on Government Official Immunity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em>by Julian Ku <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Prof. Chimene Keitner at UC-Hastings has posted a short <a  href=\"http:\/\/www.yjil.org\/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=139:officially-immune-a-response-to-bradley-and-goldsmith&amp;catid=7:online-articles\">essay in the online version of the Yale Journal of International Law<\/a> criticizing the novel and influential interpretation of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act proposed by Profs. Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith.\u00a0 In\u00a0a series of articles, Bradley and Goldsmith have argued that the FSIA&#8217;s immunity for &#8220;foreign state[s]&#8221; should be interpreted to include foreign government officials.\u00a0 This argument may very well be adopted by the Supreme Court this term in Samantar v. Yousuf (for background, see <a href=\"http:\/\/opiniojuris.org\/2009\/10\/03\/are-former-government-officials-immune-under-the-fsia\/\">here <\/a>and for my take on oral argument, see <a href=\"http:\/\/opiniojuris.org\/2010\/03\/03\/samantar-v-yousef-and-the-mysteries-of-the-foreign-sovereign-immunities-act\/\">here<\/a>). Here is a summary of her critique:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p align=\"left\"><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman;\">Stated briefly, the observation that \u201ca state acts through individuals\u201d <\/span><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman;\">does not support Bradley and Goldsmith\u2019s proposal as a matter of logic, because both U.S. and international law attribute personal responsibility to individuals for certain types of illegal conduct <\/span><em><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman;\">precisely because <\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman;\">they engage in such conduct under color of law.\u00a0 <span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman;\">When a certain criterion defines conduct as illegal, it does not make sense for that same criterion to place individuals who have engaged in that conduct categorically beyond the reach of U.S. courts. Nor do policy considerations support Bradley and Goldsmith\u2019s proposal. There are at least three reasons for this: the FSIA was not designed to include individuals, reading it to do so would conflict with the Torture Victim Protection Act, and various specialized\u00a0 <span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman;\">immunities and other non-statutory doctrines already afford substantial protections to foreign officials and to the interests of foreign states in U.S. courts. Finally, neither international treaties nor customary international law require treating all \u201cofficial capacity suits\u201d as suits against the state itself, without regard to the conduct at issue. It would be anomalous to find that international law categorically prevents states from holding individuals accountable for universally condemned violations of international law.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>I still don&#8217;t know what I think about this issue. Hopefully, I&#8217;ll figure something out before the Supreme Court comes down with a decision, but perhaps not. In any event, it is always worth considering Chimene&#8217;s take on these things.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/opiniojurisfeed\/~4\/hDghviUTPpY\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Julian Ku Prof. Chimene Keitner at UC-Hastings has posted a short essay in the online version of the Yale Journal of International Law criticizing the novel and influential interpretation of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act proposed by Profs. Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith.\u00a0 In\u00a0a series of articles, Bradley and Goldsmith have argued that the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5213,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-575525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/575525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5213"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=575525"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/575525\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=575525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=575525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=575525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}