{"id":579525,"date":"2010-05-26T12:27:01","date_gmt":"2010-05-26T16:27:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/?p=26076"},"modified":"2010-05-26T12:27:01","modified_gmt":"2010-05-26T16:27:01","slug":"will-eco-disasters-destroy-obama%e2%80%99s-legacy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/579525","title":{"rendered":"Will eco-disasters destroy Obama\u2019s legacy?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" id=\"img_mps2030437\" class=\"md_horiz alignright\" src=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/news\/feature\/2010\/05\/26\/obama_bp_oil_spill_legacy\/md_horiz.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"192\" height=\"128\" \/>That&#8217;s the headline of my new piece in Salon (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/news\/feature\/2010\/05\/26\/obama_bp_oil_spill_legacy\/index.html\">click here<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>The president is in now in genuine political trouble over the BP disaster, some of his own making, some not.<\/p>\n<p>Here are my thoughts &#8212; as always, I&#8217;d love to hear yours:<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-26076\"><\/span>The truth is  that there&#8217;s not much more that President Obama can do to stop the  eco-disaster now hitting the Gulf of Mexico. But his response to our  fossil fuel-driven crises &#8212; so far &#8212; can still be deemed grossly  inadequate.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s because the Gulf spill is actually one of two environmental  catastrophes now unfolding, and Obama doesn\u2019t seem to understand how  they are related.<\/p>\n<p>The milder but more imminent of the two is the BP disaster. It&#8217;s  now clear that the Gulf Coast will be ravaged, that the impact will be  felt for at least a generation, and that we will probably be testing  seafood from the area for decades. If the Loop Current entrains a  significant amount of the oil and dispersants to the Florida Keys,  America&#8217;s great coral reef might suffer irreparable damage.<\/p>\n<p>Most of the blame rests with BP &#8212; and with Big Oil&#8217;s powerful  supporters in Congress, who have created the voluntary, &#8220;trust us&#8221;  self-regulation we now have. Some of the blame also resides with the  Minerals Management Service, which became absurdly cozy with the  industry under the Cheney-Bush administration.<\/p>\n<p>Because BP and Big Oil deluded themselves (and everyone else) into  believing that such a disaster was unthinkable, nobody was prepared for  it. The Rube Goldberg contraptions that BP is slapping together now is  proof of this. If a single major oil company had thought that any of  BP&#8217;s jury-rigged solutions made sense, they would have pre-built and  prepositioned them a long time ago.<\/p>\n<p>With its reckless cost- and corner-cutting and efforts to hide the  magnitude of the gusher, BP has proven itself completely untrustworthy.  As millions of gallons of oil and hundreds of thousand of gallons of  dispersants cause their inevitable damage to sensitive coastal wetlands,  fish, fowl and wildlife, frustration will boil over, a process that has  already begun.<\/p>\n<div id=\"story_continue_mps2030437\" style=\"display: none;\">\n<ul>\n<li><a onclick=\"return (read_story('mps2030437') &amp;&amp; false);\" href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/news\/feature\/2010\/05\/26\/obama_bp_oil_spill_legacy\/index.html\">Continue  reading<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"story_full_mps2030437\" style=\"display: block;\">\n<p>The right is out for Obama&#8217;s head because that&#8217;s what they do. The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/video\/2010\/05\/24\/cbs_evening_news_spends_nearly_half_show_on_spill_focuses_on_impatience.html\" >media<\/a> is out for Obama&#8217;s head because that&#8217;s what they do. And, of course,  the left is out for Obama&#8217;s head because that&#8217;s what they do. Many  environmentalists are angry over Obama&#8217;s too-clever-by-half embrace of  drilling earlier this year and eager to say I told you so.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately for Obama, Congress established the principle that  the oil companies are responsible for dealing with major spills after  the Exxon Valdez disaster two decades ago. The oil companies pay for the  cleanup and the federal agencies oversee the process.<\/p>\n<p>But even more unfortunate for Obama is that in spite of BP&#8217;s  incompetence, nobody really knows how to stop the mile-deep undersea  volcano (other than drilling a relief well, which takes many weeks). And  nobody knows how to clean it up. Independent experts calculate that BP  may be spewing the equivalent of the Exxon Valdez disaster ever few  days. As Robert Brulle, a professor of Public Health at Drexel  University and 20-year Coast Guard veteran, <a href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/05\/02\/20-year-veteran-of-coast-guard-with-a-spill-of-this-magnitude-and-complexity-there-is-no-such-thing-as-an-effective-response\/\" >has  noted<\/a>, &#8220;With a spill of this magnitude and complexity, there is no  such thing as an effective response.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Buried at the end of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2010\/05\/24\/AR2010052404071_2.html?hpid=topnews&amp;sid=ST2010052404233\" >a  piece<\/a> on how Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and others are criticizing  the administration for various failings, the Washington Post has this  quote from Byron W. King, an energy analyst: &#8220;But really, Uncle Sam has  almost no institutional ability to control the oil spill. For that, you  need people with technical authority, technical skill and firms with  industrial capabilities.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>As of Monday, the Coast Guard, which is overseeing BP&#8217;s cleanup  efforts, has no plans to take over. Adm.Thad Allen said, &#8220;To push BP out  of the way would raise the question: to replace them with what? They\u2019re  exhausting every technical means possible to deal with that leak.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>On Monday, Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., <a href=\"http:\/\/tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com\/2010\/05\/nelson-its-time-for-obama--and-the-military--to-step-it-up-on-the-oil-spill.php\" >issued<\/a> a seemingly compelling call that others have made: &#8220;The military ought  to take charge. The military can organize it and be the head of the  rescue operation. Otherwise we have a situation that&#8217;s going out of  control.&#8221; But the Navy is already providing technical assistance in  plugging the leak and the Coast Guard is coordinating and overseeing the  cleanup effort by BP. Even Nelson couldn&#8217;t explain how the military was  better positioned to deal with the disaster.<\/p>\n<p>If I were Obama, I&#8217;d put Jindal in charge of the Louisiana  response. In the unlikely event Jindal can accomplish much, everybody  wins. In the likely event he can&#8217;t, well &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Obama&#8217;s problem is that the situation is virtually uncontrollable.  And this is characteristic of big environmental disasters &#8212;  particularly so with the biggest catastrophe that is now unfolding:  human-caused global warming. Indeed, the impact of unrestricted  emissions of greenhouse gases &#8212; from sea level rise to desertification  to ocean acidification &#8212; will likely be irreversible for centuries.<\/p>\n<p>And that&#8217;s why Obama&#8217;s legacy &#8212; and indeed the legacy of all 21st  century presidents, starting with George W. Bush &#8212; will be determined  primarily by whether we avert catastrophic climate change. If not, then  Obama &#8212; and all of us &#8212; will be seen as a failure, and rightfully so.<\/p>\n<p>There would be no other way to judge all of us if we (and the rest  of the world) stay on our current greenhouse gas emissions path, which  risks warming most of the inland United States by nine degrees or more  by century\u2019s end and which could lead to sea levels 3 to 6 feet higher  (rising perhaps an inch or two a year), cause the Southwest &#8212; from  Kansas to California &#8212; to become a permanent dust bowl, and transform  much of the ocean into a hot, acidic dead zone. All of this would make  the BP oil disaster fade into distant memory.<\/p>\n<p>By the end of the third decade of this century, all of American  life &#8212; politics, international relations, our homes, our jobs, our  industries, the kind of cars we drive &#8212; will be forever transformed by  the climate and energy challenge.<\/p>\n<p>Obama is the first president in history to articulate in stark  terms both the why and how of the sustainable clean energy vision. Last  April, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/the_press_office\/Remarks-by-the-President-in-Newton-IA\/\" >he  said<\/a>, &#8220;The choice we face is not between saving our environment and  saving our economy. <strong>The choice we face is between prosperity  and decline.<\/strong>&#8221; In October, he said at MIT, &#8220;There are those who  will suggest that moving toward clean energy will destroy our economy &#8212;  when it&#8217;s the system we currently have that endangers our prosperity  and prevents us from creating millions of new jobs.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But while Obama is a great speechmaker, he is not yet a great  communicator &#8212; like, say, Ronald Reagan or Winston Churchill. He lacks  Reagan&#8217;s overarching, consistent ideology and he lacks Churchill&#8217;s laser  focus on the imminent threat and the consequences of inaction.<\/p>\n<p>Obama needs to take charge of the spill response, yes. But more  important, he needs to communicate to Americans that the disaster was  ultimately caused by our addiction to fossil fuel &#8212; and to make it  clear that we face a far greater disaster if we don&#8217;t start working  toward ending that addiction. In short, it&#8217;s time to move away from the  dirty, unsafe fuels of the 19th century and to embrace the clean safe  fuels of the 21st century that never run out.<\/p>\n<p>He needs to devote himself to passing comprehensive climate and  clean energy legislation this year, the best chance he&#8217;ll have during  his presidency to do so &#8212; and thus to preserve the health and  well-being of future generations of Americans (not to mention his  legacy). And this means more than just saying all the right things. What  Obama must do is lead the Senate to a solution that many are too  fearful to devise themselves.<\/p>\n<p>There may not be much more Obama can do about the eco-disaster in  the Gulf. But he absolutely can &#8212; and must &#8212; do much more to stop the  eco-disaster hitting our climate.<\/p>\n<p>Related Posts:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a title=\"Permanent Link  to Obama\u2019s campaign pollster:  \u201cIn  the  aftermath of the oil spill  disaster, voters overwhelmingly support a   comprehensive clean energy  bill\u2026.  Voters understand the dangers of our   dependence on oil. Now,  they\u2019re ready to hold Congress accountable.\u201d\" rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/05\/10\/oil-spill-poll-energy-bill-climate\/\">Obama\u2019s   campaign pollster: \u201cIn the aftermath of the oil spill disaster, voters   overwhelmingly support a comprehensive clean energy bill\u2026. Voters   understand the dangers of our dependence on oil. Now, they\u2019re ready to   hold Congress accountable.\u201d<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a title=\"Permanent Link to Is Obama blowing his best  chance  to shift the debate from the dirty, unsafe energy of the 19th  century  to the clean, safe energy of the 21st century?\" rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/05\/04\/obama-speech-bp-oil-disaster-clean-energy-climate-bill\/\">Is  Obama blowing his best chance to shift the debate from the dirty,  unsafe energy of the 19th century to the clean, safe energy of the 21st  century?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a title=\"Permanent Link to Video:  Robert Redford  tells  President Obama it\u2019s time to lead \u201cAmerica on a path to cleaner,  safer  energy\u201d\" rel=\"bookmark\" href=\"http:\/\/climateprogress.org\/2010\/05\/19\/robert-redford-tells-president-obama-its-time-to-lead-america-on-a-path-to-clean-energy\/\">Video:   Robert Redford tells President Obama it\u2019s time to lead  \u201cAmerica on a  path to cleaner, safer energy\u201d<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>That&#8217;s the headline of my new piece in Salon (click here). The president is in now in genuine political trouble over the BP disaster, some of his own making, some not. Here are my thoughts &#8212; as always, I&#8217;d love to hear yours: The truth is that there&#8217;s not much more that President Obama can [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":687,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-579525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/579525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/687"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=579525"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/579525\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=579525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=579525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=579525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}