{"id":580022,"date":"2010-05-26T11:52:58","date_gmt":"2010-05-26T15:52:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/jurist.org\/paperchase\/2010\/05\/oklahoma-legislature-sends-health-care-opt-out-to-voters.php"},"modified":"2010-05-26T11:52:58","modified_gmt":"2010-05-26T15:52:58","slug":"oklahoma-voters-to-decide-on-health-care-opt-out-amendment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/580022","title":{"rendered":"Oklahoma voters to decide on health care opt-out amendment"},"content":{"rendered":"<table align=\"left\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/jurist.law.pitt.edu\/topstoryphoto\/fronthealthcare.jpg\" alt=\"Photo source or description\" valign=\"top\" align=\"left\" border=\"1\" hspace=\"0\" vspace=\"4\"><\/td>\n<td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/jurist.law.pitt.edu\/images\/s.gif\" border=\"0\" height=\"1\" width=\"5\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>[JURIST] The Oklahoma <a href=\"http:\/\/www.okhouse.gov\/Index.aspx\">House of Representatives<\/a> [official website] on Tuesday voted 88-9 to put a constitutional amendment purporting to exempt state residents from the <a href=\"http:\/\/jurist.org\/gazette\/2010\/03\/health-care-reform-bill-us-house.php\">federal health care law<\/a> [HR 3590; JURIST <a href=\"http:\/\/jurist.org\/jurist_search.php?q=health+care\">news archive<\/a>] on the November ballot. The vote comes after the Oklahoma <a href=\"http:\/\/www.oksenate.gov\/\">Senate<\/a> [official website] voted <a href=\"http:\/\/www.oksenate.gov\/legislation\/votes\/02574.pdf\">30-13<\/a> [roll call, PDF] in favor of the ballot initiative earlier this month. The legislation would ask voters whether they wanted to add an amendment to the Oklahoma <a href=\"http:\/\/oklegal.onenet.net\/okcon\/\">Constitution<\/a> [text] prohibiting &#8220;forced participation in the health care system.&#8221; If approved, the amendment would <a href=\"http:\/\/www.okhouse.gov\/OkhouseMedia\/ShowStory.aspx?MediaNewsID=3637\">exempt state residents<\/a> [press release] from any penalty for failing to purchase health insurance, according to the bill&#8217;s sponsors. Most Americans will be required to purchase health insurance by 2014 under the health care law. In a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.okhouse.tv\/ViewVideo.aspx?VideoID=289\">statement<\/a> , state <a href=\"http:\/\/www.okhouse.gov\/District100\">Representative Mike Thompson<\/a> (R) [official website], a sponsor of the bill, described the effort as a &#8220;shield &#8230; from a federal takeover of our health care system,&#8221; and stated:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>SJR 59 is the answer to Oklahoma citizens about opting out of Obamacare. &#8230; What this legislation does is it empowers the voters to make the decision whether or not they want a single payer system implemented on them. &#8230; [T]his legislation builds upon the state constitution &#8230; [which is] the first line of defense for a state.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The ballot initiative comes after the Oklahoma Senate failed to override a veto by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ok.gov\/governor\/index.php\">Governor Brad Henry<\/a> (D) [official website] of a bill that would have attempted to statutorily exempt state residents from the individual mandate provision of health care reform. Henry <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ok.gov\/governor\/display_article.php?article_id=1390&#038;article_type=1\">cited<\/a> [veto message] the costs of litigation, could jeopardize health care funding from the federal government, and the inability of a state to &#8220;selectively ignore federal laws of its choosing,&#8221; as reasons for the veto. The bill would have also allowed state legislators to sue the federal government to overturn the health care reform law.<\/p>\n<p>Oklahoma joins Florida and Arizona in placing similar constitutional amendments on the November ballot. On Monday, the Obama administration <a href=\"http:\/\/jurist.org\/paperchase\/2010\/05\/obama-administration-seeks-dismissal-of-virginia-health-care-suit.php\">filed a brief<\/a> [JURIST report] urging the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by Virginia challenging the constitutionality of the individual mandate provision of the health care reform. Earlier this month, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nfib.com\/\">National Federation of Independent Businesses<\/a> (NFIB) [association website], a small business lobby group, <a href=\"http:\/\/myfloridalegal.com\/webfiles.nsf\/WF\/MRAY-83TKWB\/$file\/HealthCareReformLawsuit.pdf\">joined a separate lawsuit<\/a> [JURIST report] challenging the health care reform law. The NFIB joined <a href=\"http:\/\/jurist.org\/paperchase\/2010\/04\/georgia-to-join-health-care-lawsuit.php\">20 states<\/a> in a suit that began in March when a complaint seeking injunction and declaratory relief was <a href=\"http:\/\/jurist.org\/paperchase\/2010\/03\/attorneys-general-of-13-states-file.php\">filed<\/a> [JURIST reports] in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.flnd.uscourts.gov\/\">US District Court for the Northern District of Florida<\/a> [official website]. Among the allegations in the suit are violations of Article I and the Tenth Amendment of the US <a href=\"http:\/\/topics.law.cornell.edu\/constitution\">Constitution<\/a> [text], committed by levying a tax without regard to census data, property, or profession, and for invading the the sovereignty of the states. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[JURIST] The Oklahoma House of Representatives [official website] on Tuesday voted 88-9 to put a constitutional amendment purporting to exempt state residents from the federal health care law [HR 3590; JURIST news archive] on the November ballot. The vote comes after the Oklahoma Senate [official website] voted 30-13 [roll call, PDF] in favor of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6950,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-580022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/580022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6950"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=580022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/580022\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=580022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=580022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=580022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}