{"id":582742,"date":"2010-05-28T07:05:56","date_gmt":"2010-05-28T11:05:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.prisonplanet.com\/?p=44304"},"modified":"2010-05-28T07:05:56","modified_gmt":"2010-05-28T11:05:56","slug":"where-has-the-magic-gone","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/582742","title":{"rendered":"Where Has the Magic Gone?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Via Prison Planet.com \u00bb Sci Tech<\/p>\n

JAMES TARANTO
\nWall St Journal<\/a>
\nMay 28, 2010<\/p>\n

lead paragraph from the New York Times<\/a> is just priceless:<\/p>\n

\n

Last month hundreds of environmental activists crammed into an auditorium here to ponder an anguished question: If the scientific consensus on climate change has not changed, why have so many people turned away from the idea that human activity is warming the planet?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Imagine popular children’s fables retold by Times reporter Elisabeth Rosenthal: Anguished weavers gathered to ponder the sudden shift in fashion by subjects who only recently thought the emperor was wearing a splendid suit of clothes. If the boy still says there is a wolf, why have so many farmers turned away from the idea that the sheep are in danger?<\/p>\n

Rosenthal reports from London, because the “shift in public opinion” has been especially “striking” in Britain, where “climate change” was once a “popular priority”:<\/p>\n

\n

But since then, the country has evolved into a home base for a thriving group of climate skeptics who have dominated news reports in recent months, apparently convincing many that the threat of warming is vastly exaggerated.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The Times story could be titled “What’s the Matter With Many?” Not only do opinion polls in Britain and elsewhere show a significant drop in public credulity about climate alarmism, but newly elected Prime Minister David Cameron “was ’strangely muted’ on the issue in a recent pre-election debate, as The Daily Telegraph put it, though it had previously been one of his passions.” And then there’s this:<\/p>\n

\n

London’s Science Museum recently announced that a permanent exhibit scheduled to open later this year would be called the Climate Science Gallery–not the Climate Change Gallery as had previously been planned.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

That last bit is just an example of the euphemism treadmill at work. We’re old enough to remember the “greenhouse effect,” which became “global warming,” which became “climate change,” which now apparently has become “climate science.” Just as “retarded” was a clinical term until it developed connotations of mockery and insult, so each term for greenhouseeffectglobalwarmingclimatechangeclimatescience comes to connote dishonest alarmism–because that is what GEGWCCCS is all about.<\/p>\n

Full article here<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Where<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Related Posts:<\/h3>\n