{"id":644031,"date":"2013-02-26T09:40:10","date_gmt":"2013-02-26T14:40:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/serkadis.com\/index\/?guid=39892c7d2db2a6768160fe7b74d7e081"},"modified":"2013-02-26T09:40:19","modified_gmt":"2013-02-26T14:40:19","slug":"marissa-mayer-is-no-fool","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/644031","title":{"rendered":"Marissa Mayer Is No Fool"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/static2.hbr.org\/schrage\/flatmm\/hed\/20130226_5.jpg\" class=\"pageFeatureImage\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Who do Yahoo&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/business\/archive\/2013\/02\/marissa-mayer-is-wrong-working-from-home-can-make-you-more-productive\/273482\/\">&#8220;work@home&#8221;<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/qz.com\/56665\/the-worst-decision-marissa-mayer-has-made-in-her-tenure-as-yahoo-ceo\/\">telecommuting<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.blogher.com\/why-yahoo-just-became-obsolete\">champions<\/a> think they&#8217;re kidding? Marissa Mayer is no fool. She didn&#8217;t take over as Yahoo&#8217;s CEO because the company was doing well; she came on board because the stumbling Internet enterprise was an underperforming underachiever that had lost its way. <\/p>\n<p>So when Mayer decrees seven months into the job that she wants people to, you know, physically show up at work instead of telecommuting &#8212; or else &#8212; I&#8217;m pretty confident this reflects <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/heres-the-data-marissa-mayer-is-after-as-she-re-envision-yahoos-sales-force-2012-10\">a data-driven decision<\/a> more than a cavalier command. In all likelihood, Mayer has taken good, hard looks at Yahoo&#8217;s top 250 performers and top 20 projects and come to her own conclusions about who&#8217;s creating real value &#8212; and how &#8212; in her company. She knows who her best people are. <\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s be serious: if significant portions of Yahoo top performers were &#8220;stay@home&#8221; coders, testers and project management telecommuters, do people really think Mayer would arbitrarily issue edicts guaranteed to alienate them? It&#8217;s possible. But that would imply Mayer hasn&#8217;t learned very much about her company&#8217;s best people, best performers and culture since joining last July. Most successful technical leaders I know avoid getting in the way of their best people&#8217;s productivity. But what do leaders do when even very good people aren&#8217;t being as productive as you want or need them to be?  Challenging them to be better onsite collaborators hardly seems either unfair or irrational.<\/p>\n<p>The logical inference to draw from Mayer&#8217;s action is that she strongly believes Yahoo&#8217;s current &#8220;stay@home&#8221; telecommuting crowd would be significantly more valuable to the company &#8212; organizationally, operationally and culturally &#8212; if they came to work. The crueler inference is that both the real and opportunity costs imposed by Yahoo&#8217;s &#8220;work@homes&#8221; greatly exceeded their technical and economic contributions. My bet is that Mayer believes that &#8220;working@home&#8221; isn&#8217;t working for Yahoo &#8212; in both meanings of that phrase.<\/p>\n<p>Again, why should this surprise? Flailing companies shouldn&#8217;t invest more in what&#8217;s not working. The (far) more interesting counterfactual would have been a leaked memo declaring that telecommuters and virtual teams were &#8212; by far &#8212; the most agile, innovative and productive performers at Yahoo. Therefore the company would delayer its headquarters and remake itself as a virtual networked enterprise. If that had been true, Mayer would have been a different kind of teleworkplace revolutionary.<\/p>\n<p>Then again, Mayer&#8217;s Google background (and impact) suggested that she was predisposed to consider physical (co)presence as essential to digital innovation success as computational\/design brilliance. After all, one key reason why Google invested so heavily in providing world-class victuals and dining experiences at the Googleplex for its employees wasn&#8217;t health food benevolence, <a href=\"http:\/\/news.cnet.com\/Meet-Googles-culture-czar\/2008-1023_3-6179897.html\">it was to keep people on campus<\/a> working together. Google explicitly encourages and designs for onsite collaboration. Why would Mayer minimize what she had experienced as a critical success factor?<\/p>\n<p>In fairness, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.virgin.com\/richard-branson\/blog\/give-people-the-freedom-of-where-to-work\">critics such as Virgin&#8217;s Richard Branson<\/a> are not wrong when they assert the cultural issues here are arguably as much a matter of trust than facilitating collaboration. But trust cuts both ways. If a CEO authentically concludes that too many &#8220;work@homes&#8221; have not lived up to their side of the productivity relationship, then the call to return to the workplace could be interpreted as an invitation to rebuild trust. (That&#8217;s nicer than simply firing them.)<\/p>\n<p>Culture matters. Ultimately, turnaround CEOs have to make the very public choice around not just how best to empower people but how best to hold them accountable. I take Mayer at her word that she wants to promote the values of &#8220;collaborative opportunism&#8221; and  &#8220;opportunistic collaboration&#8221; at the &#8220;new&#8221; Yahoo. That should be a leader&#8217;s prerogative. I similarly don&#8217;t doubt Mayer knows full well that there&#8217;s no shortage of technology enabling high bandwidth, highly functional, high impact collaboration across time zones and zip codes alike. My bet is that, sooner rather than later, the truly productive\/high impact employees with special needs will enjoy a locational flexibility that their lesser will not.<\/p>\n<p>But, for the moment, this CEO has done what I always thought good CEOs were supposed to do: identify unproductive &#8220;business as usual&#8221; practices, declare them unacceptable and incompatible with her cultural aspirations for the firm &#8212; and then act. I completely understand why it makes so many employees unhappy. I&#8217;m sympathetic to the changes they&#8217;re being told to make. But, on this issue for this company, my deeper sympathies belong to the CEO. \n<\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.harvardbusiness.org\/~ff\/harvardbusiness?a=b7QZTfZbpsQ:_3tmEzj3gnw:yIl2AUoC8zA\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/harvardbusiness?d=yIl2AUoC8zA\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.harvardbusiness.org\/~ff\/harvardbusiness?a=b7QZTfZbpsQ:_3tmEzj3gnw:bcOpcFrp8Mo\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/harvardbusiness?d=bcOpcFrp8Mo\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/harvardbusiness\/~4\/b7QZTfZbpsQ\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Who do Yahoo&#8217;s &#8220;work@home&#8221; telecommuting champions think they&#8217;re kidding? Marissa Mayer is no fool. She didn&#8217;t take over as Yahoo&#8217;s CEO because the company was doing well; she came on board because the stumbling Internet enterprise was an underperforming underachiever that had lost its way. So when Mayer decrees seven months into the job that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7018,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-644031","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/644031","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7018"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=644031"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/644031\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=644031"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=644031"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=644031"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}