{"id":644225,"date":"2013-02-27T06:00:35","date_gmt":"2013-02-27T11:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gigaom.com\/?p=614935"},"modified":"2013-02-27T06:00:35","modified_gmt":"2013-02-27T11:00:35","slug":"exclusive-happtique-releases-standards-for-seal-of-approval-for-mobile-health","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/644225","title":{"rendered":"Exclusive: Happtique releases standards for \u2018seal of approval\u2019 for mobile health"},"content":{"rendered":"

With an estimated 40,000 mobile health apps<\/a>\u00a0(PDF) available for doctors, consumers and others in healthcare, it can be hard to separate quality apps from, well, crap. \u00a0A November report<\/a> from the New England Center for Investigative Reporting highlighted the number of apps that over promise and under deliver. And while more doctors are using apps<\/a> to monitor patients or check information, there are still valid concerns about reliability, privacy and security<\/a>.<\/p>\n

To help give hospitals and health care providers more clarity around the good, bad and ugly in mobile health apps, New York-based Happtique has been working on a certification program for mobile apps and on Wednesday plans to release its final set of standards<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cOne of the things I hear all the time when I\u2019m dealing with providers and institutions is \u2018hey, there are so many apps out there, how do we know which ones have just even been looked at by clinicians? … Or within [a category] \u2018how do we decide which ones that we\u2019ll use or recommend to patients?\u2019,\u201d said Ben Chodor, CEO of Happtique. \u201cThey just need somewhere to turn where at least these apps have been peer-reviewed and scanned so we know that they\u2019re safe.\u201d<\/p>\n

In the past year, Happtique has enlisted experts and patient advocates to serve on its standards committee<\/a>, and it\u2019s met with hospital and medical associations and government agencies to hear their feedback. Last July, it released a draft of its standards<\/a> (PDF) to give developers, care providers and other health care professionals the opportunity to comment.<\/p>\n

The final standards released Wednesday cover not only technical performance, including operability, privacy and security, but content standards. For example, they encompass issues like the credibility of an app\u2019s information and sources, the fairness of its description and claims, compliance with rules and regulations and advertising disclosures.<\/p>\n

Chodor said they\u2019re intended to give health care providers and consumers a Good Housekeeping-like \u201cseal of approval\u201d to look for, as well as provide app developers a set of guidelines to build to and a way to show customers their value.<\/p>\n

The Food and Drug Administration is still expected to hand down its own guidelines — and Happtique says its standards will shift to follow federal regulations. But the FDA will only cover some mobile apps, leaving others in a gray area still helped by an industry standard, Chodor said, adding that Happtique could also be a feeder to the FDA.<\/p>\n

Still, even though mobile health could certainly be helped by standards, some argue<\/a> that Happtique\u2019s plan is unfolding a little too early<\/a> because there aren\u2019t enough good apps worth filtering out. And, in the vast and quickly growing world of mobile health, Happtique will have to establish itself as a trusted, known name. But its pedigree and partnerships will likely serve it well — not only did it grow out of the hospital community (it was incubated in the venture arm of the Greater New York Hospital Association), it\u2019s signed on impressive partners, including Mount Sinai Hospital, the NYU School of Medicine and Beth Israel Medical Center.<\/p>\n

While Happtique\u2019s final guidelines will be released Wednesday, it won\u2019t start taking submissions from developers until this spring. At that time, app developers interested in certification will pay $2,500 to $3,000 and then it will go to third-party partners for review. The Association of American Medical Colleges<\/a> and the Commission on Graduates for Foreign Nursing Schools (CGFNS),<\/a> a credentialing authority for healthcare professionals, will review the content and Intertek<\/a> will scan for technical performance.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:<\/strong>
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial<\/a>.<\/p>\n