{"id":653948,"date":"2013-04-23T08:45:58","date_gmt":"2013-04-23T12:45:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/bgr.com\/?p=459316"},"modified":"2013-04-23T08:45:58","modified_gmt":"2013-04-23T12:45:58","slug":"itc-rules-iphone-doesnt-infringe-googles-patents","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/653948","title":{"rendered":"ITC rules iPhone doesn\u2019t infringe Google\u2019s patents"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><center><a href=\"http:\/\/bgr.com\/2013\/04\/23\/apple-google-patent-case-itc-decision-459316\/\" class=\"bgr-rss-featured-image bgr-rss-test-class\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/i1.wp.com\/boygeniusreport.files.wordpress.com\/2012\/10\/apple-iphone-4-back-blur.jpeg?resize=610%2C436\" class=\"attachment-feed_normal wp-post-image\" alt=\"iPhone doesn&#039;t infringe Google&#039;s patents\" title=\"iPhone 4\" width=\"610\" height=\"436\" \/><\/a><\/center>The United States International Trade Commission on Monday evening ruled that <a href=\"http:\/\/bgr.com\/tag\/apple\">Apple&#8217;s<\/a> iPhone does not infringe on technology\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/bgr.com\/tag\/google\">Google<\/a>\u00a0gained when it <a href=\"http:\/\/bgr.com\/2011\/08\/15\/google-to-acquire-motorola-mobility-for-12-5-billion\/\">acquired Motorola Mobility in 2011<\/a>. The company had been seeking an import ban against the <a href=\"http:\/\/bgr.com\/tag\/iphone-4\">iPhone 4<\/a>\u00a0because it allegedly uses Motorola&#8217;s protected technology. A panel of judges upheld an earlier decision, however, that found <a href=\"http:\/\/bgr.com\/2012\/12\/19\/itc-motorola-patent-invalid-apple-259265\/\">the proximity sensor patent Motorola was asserting is invalid<\/a>. A Google spokesperson <a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/2013\/04\/23\/us-apple-google-patent-idUSBRE93L17Y20130423\">told <em>Reuters<\/em><\/a> that the company was &#8220;disappointed with this outcome and are evaluating our options.&#8221; The decision can now be appealed the to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/TheBoyGeniusReport\/~4\/45SsgemBIrs\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The United States International Trade Commission on Monday evening ruled that Apple&#8217;s iPhone does not infringe on technology\u00a0Google\u00a0gained when it acquired Motorola Mobility in 2011. The company had been seeking an import ban against the iPhone 4\u00a0because it allegedly uses Motorola&#8217;s protected technology. A panel of judges upheld an earlier decision, however, that found the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7439,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-653948","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/653948","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7439"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=653948"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/653948\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=653948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=653948"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=653948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}