{"id":656608,"date":"2013-05-07T17:21:19","date_gmt":"2013-05-07T21:21:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/paidcontent.org\/?p=229038"},"modified":"2013-05-07T17:21:19","modified_gmt":"2013-05-07T21:21:19","slug":"nyts-jill-abramson-social-media-was-biggest-difference-between-boston-and-911","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/656608","title":{"rendered":"NYT\u2019s Jill Abramson: Social media was biggest difference between Boston and 9\/11"},"content":{"rendered":"

When bombs in Boston went off last month, Jill Abramson went in minutes from\u00a0being a “joyous executive editor” at a\u00a0ceremony celebrating the New York Times<\/em>‘ recent Pulitzer Prize wins to overseeing a major story.<\/p>\n

Abramson is familiar with working on major news events, including 9\/11, but said her primary concerns were different this time.<\/p>\n

“In Boston, what was first and foremost was making sure our standards were understood,” Abramson said at the Wired Business conference in New York City on Tuesday.<\/p>\n

Abramson said that, for major stories in the past, the only focus was the next day’s paper. This time around, she was preoccupied with ensuring that no one at the paper seized on one of the many thinly sourced rumors flying around on social media.<\/p>\n

Abramson, speaking with Wired\u00a0<\/em>editor-in-chief\u00a0Scott Dedich, also addressed other recent trends in media, including a popular marketing trend.<\/p>\n

“Native advertising seems to be for the conference set. It’s the buzz word of 2013,” she said, pouring cold water on a term popularized by BuzzFeed and others.<\/p>\n

Abramson spoke of the “months and months and months” of effort that went into producing the NYT’s Pulitzer Prize-winning multimedia story “Snow Fall: The Avalanche at Tunnel Creek,”\u00a0but didn’t address how the paper will fund such projects in the future. She did note, though, that technical virtuosity isn’t enough for great journalism.<\/p>\n

“I think that what a new editor needs first and foremost, and this sounds old-fashioned, is that gut sense of what’s a great NYT story.”<\/p>\n

The discussion didn’t touch on a widely panned<\/a>\u00a0Politico report that Abramson was losing the newsroom, but did address her role as first female executive editor of the Times<\/em>. She said that there was no point being the first woman in anything if there wasn’t going to be a second, but said she was pleased with overall gender roles at the Times<\/em>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:<\/strong>
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial<\/a>.<\/p>\n