{"id":657698,"date":"2013-05-13T18:52:47","date_gmt":"2013-05-13T22:52:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/paidcontent.org\/?p=229351"},"modified":"2013-05-13T18:52:47","modified_gmt":"2013-05-13T22:52:47","slug":"its-not-about-how-long-form-your-content-is-its-about-engagement-with-the-reader","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/657698","title":{"rendered":"It\u2019s not about how long-form your content is, it\u2019s about engagement with the reader"},"content":{"rendered":"

There’s been a bit of a backlash brewing in media circles lately: a growing movement against the idea that online journalism has to consist solely of hundreds of tiny news briefs or slideshows, and in favor of the idea that “longform” writing can also thrive online. Along those lines, the technology site Fast Company<\/em> provided some interesting data recently about its experience<\/a> with writing longer pieces — but I think the conclusions it arrived at aren’t about length as much as they are about engagement. And that is a very different story altogether.<\/p>\n

In his post, entitled “This Is What Happens When Publishers Invest In Long Stories<\/em>,” FastCo Labs editor Chris Dannan talked about how the site decided to experiment with what he calls “slow live-blogging” — that is, a series of stories that would take shape over time<\/a>, beginning with a short stub article consisting mostly of a topic paragraph or summary of an issue, and then get added to as new developments arose. Dannan explained that this was a way of blending news with a more feature-like approach.<\/p>\n

\n

“Instead of starting with a fresh article every time we want to cover something inside a regular beat, which might require a long catch-up introduction, context, background and so forth, we could just put fresh news at the top and let the reader scroll down to read previous updates.”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Readers stay longer and read more<\/h2>\n

What happened when this approach started getting rolled out, Dannan says, was fairly dramatic. As he puts it in his post<\/a>, the results “blew up my assumptions about how to drive traffic.” Among other things, the tech site’s “bounce rate” — that is, the rate at which readers decided to quit reading and go elsewhere — dropped substantially. The average amount of time spent at the site also increased, as did the number of pages per visit that were read by users.<\/p>\n

\"3009577-inline-3visitdurationpagespervisit\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Dannan says it’s too early to tell how permanent these effects will be for Fast Co. Labs, just as it’s impossible to know whether those favorable results stem from the changes they made in their approach to longer stories. But he says that regardless of these caveats, “it sure as hell looks like it’s working,” and that he believes long-form journalism is the future.<\/p>\n

It’s not length, it’s engagement<\/h2>\n

I am a big believer in the value of longer pieces in general, and I think the once-popular myth that people don’t read longform articles online has been largely disproven (although I wonder how many of those who praised the New York Times<\/em> feature Snow Fall read the whole thing). But it’s also true that editors and publishers often conflate length and quality — as Caroline O’Donovan pointed out in a (short) post<\/a> on Fast Co.’s experience at the Nieman Journalism Lab.<\/p>\n

I think Fast Company’s results actually show something very different from the appeal of longform articles per se: since these posts began with “stub” articles and then grew over time, as more news or analysis emerged about the topic itself, I think they show the value of engaging readers by following a story over time and providing some kind of comprehensive background and context, instead of just bombarding them with a stream of news briefs.<\/p>\n

That approach may result in longer stories, but I think that’s almost a side effect rather than the main attraction. No one is going to read those kinds of posts simply because they are long — but if a site builds a narrative and a point of view and some context over time about an issue (the mobile news-reading app Circa is trying to do this by allowing users to “follow” specific<\/a> breaking news stories, and then alerting them to updates) then it pays off in engagement.<\/p>\n

There are lessons in there not just for new-media players but for traditional media outlets that are trying to find a recipe for success online as well.<\/p>\n

Post and thumbnail photos courtesy of Scholastic<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:<\/strong>
Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial<\/a>.<\/p>\n