{"id":92819,"date":"2009-12-21T18:32:51","date_gmt":"2009-12-21T23:32:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20091211\/1236517310.shtml"},"modified":"2009-12-21T18:32:51","modified_gmt":"2009-12-21T23:32:51","slug":"higher-itunes-prices-how-much-goes-to-the-artists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/92819","title":{"rendered":"Higher iTunes Prices? How Much Goes To The Artists?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Earlier this year, Apple finally <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20090106\/1039003297.shtml\">agreed<\/a> to strong pressure from the major record labels to introduce variable pricing on iTunes &#8212; which officially would make some popular songs $1.29 and (in theory) also offer older, back catalog songs for $0.69.  In reality, it&#8217;s pretty difficult to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20090407\/1204234423.shtml\">find<\/a> any of those $0.69 songs.  However, as a musician, which would you prefer?  Well, as <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/Shocklee\/statuses\/6570695233\" >Shocklee<\/a> alerts us, <a href=\"http:\/\/musicindustryreport.org\/?p=14721\" >most musicians might not see any of that additional fee<\/a> (that report is a little misleading, though, in that it suggests &#8212; incorrectly &#8212; that all songs were driven up to $1.29).  I have to admit that I&#8217;m a bit surprised by this, and wonder if it&#8217;s really accurate.  The telling quote in the article is this one:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i><br \/>\n&#8220;Artists receive fixed residuals for music sales based on individual contracts via their respective record companies,&#8221; says Max Clingerman, a music executive for MixJam Records who explains &#8220;the staggering price increases are not for the artist interest, rather intended for executive pockets.&#8221;<br \/>\n<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>While I&#8217;m sure the intention was very much for exec pockets, I was under the impression that most major label contracts included royalty rates based on <i>retail price<\/i>.  And while most signed musicians <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20091201\/1957497156.shtml\">never recoup<\/a> their advance, and thus never see any royalties whatsoever (no matter what the price), I do wonder if it&#8217;s really true that musicians don&#8217;t get a larger cut of higher priced digital sales (at least in the fictional accounting systems the labels use).<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the larger point made by the article is almost certainly true.  In increasing the price to $1.29, the demand for such songs has been driven down significantly, leading people to look for alternative sources for the same music.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20091211\/1236517310.shtml\">Permalink<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20091211\/1236517310.shtml#comments\">Comments<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/article.php?sid=20091211\/1236517310&#038;op=sharethis\">Email This Story<\/a><br \/>\n <br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/click.phdo?s=7d8eae4af21b38cb23ca16c9ca87cba1&#038;p=1\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" style=\"border: 0;\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/img.phdo?s=7d8eae4af21b38cb23ca16c9ca87cba1&#038;p=1\"\/><\/a><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" height=\"0\" width=\"0\" border=\"0\" style=\"display:none\" src=\"http:\/\/a.rfihub.com\/eus.gif?eui=2225\"\/><\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.techdirt.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?a=kxdZOReU5f4:V1GcQZtv54g:D7DqB2pKExk\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?i=kxdZOReU5f4:V1GcQZtv54g:D7DqB2pKExk\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.techdirt.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?a=kxdZOReU5f4:V1GcQZtv54g:c-S6u7MTCTE\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?d=c-S6u7MTCTE\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/techdirt\/feed\/~4\/kxdZOReU5f4\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Earlier this year, Apple finally agreed to strong pressure from the major record labels to introduce variable pricing on iTunes &#8212; which officially would make some popular songs $1.29 and (in theory) also offer older, back catalog songs for $0.69. In reality, it&#8217;s pretty difficult to find any of those $0.69 songs. However, as a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-92819","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92819","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92819"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92819\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92819"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92819"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92819"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}