{"id":99050,"date":"2009-12-24T17:40:27","date_gmt":"2009-12-24T22:40:27","guid":{"rendered":"9341 at http:\/\/www.eff.org"},"modified":"2009-12-24T17:40:27","modified_gmt":"2009-12-24T22:40:27","slug":"fighting-internet-censorship-in-australia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/99050","title":{"rendered":"Fighting Internet Censorship in Australia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Our fellow Internet freedom advocates at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.efa.org.au\/news\/200912-efa-newsletter\/\">Electronic Frontiers Australia<\/a> are gearing up for an <a href=\"http:\/\/nocleanfeed.com\/\">important fight<\/a> in the new year as the Australian government proposes mandatory national Internet filters with a secret blacklist.  EFA is looking for volunteers and colleagues &mdash; particularly Australians, but they can use help from outside Australia as well &mdash; to help take on this critical issue.  As Lelia Green <a href=\"http:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/opinion\/politics\/internet-filter-will-not-stop-child-porn-peddlers-20091217-kzfy.html\">wrote<\/a> in the <cite>Sydney Morning Herald<\/cite>, the censorship proposal risks &#8220;legitimating a range of repressive policies pursued by some of the globe&#8217;s least accountable governments.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In 2006, the <cite>New York Times<\/cite> reported that the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/02\/14\/international\/asia\/14cnd-china.html\">People&#8217;s Republic of China was defending its Internet censorship and surveillance practices<\/a> by claiming that they were not particularly different from those of other countries.  The <cite>Times<\/cite> reported that a Chinese official argued (in the newspaper&#8217;s paraphrase) that &#8220;the controls [China] places on Web sites and Internet service providers in mainland China do not differ much from those employed by the United States and European countries&#8221;.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;If you study the main international practices in this regard you will find that China is basically in compliance with the international norm,&#8221; [Liu Zhengrong] said. &#8220;The main purposes and methods of implementing our laws are basically the same.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>[&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It is clear that any country&#8217;s legal authorities closely monitor the spread of illegal information,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We have noted that the U.S. is doing a good job on this front.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>This argument sounded like a weak rationalization in 2006, and the <cite>Times<\/cite> noted various qualitative differences between Internet restrictions in the PRC and those in liberal democracies.  But researchers have told us that governments around the world, including Australia&#8217;s, seem eager to chip away at those differences.  The forthcoming book <a href=\"http:\/\/mitpress.mit.edu\/catalog\/item\/default.asp?ttype=2&amp;tid=12187\"><cite>Access Controlled<\/cite><\/a> from the <A href=\"http:\/\/www.opennet.net\/\">OpenNet Initiative<\/a>, according to its authors, reports on an alarming trend where &#8220;Internet filtering, censorship of Web content, and online surveillance are increasing in scale, scope, and sophistication around the world, in democratic countries as well as in authoritarian states.&#8221;  The OpenNet Initiative researchers have also noted that governments are increasingly looking to other countries&#8217; practices as precedents. Soon illiberal regimes&#8217; claims that Internet censorship and national firewalls are a widespread international norm could ring less hollow.  Some year soon, it may be sober fact rather than rationalization.<\/p>\n<p>EFA&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/nocleanfeed.com\/\">fight against Internet censorship in Australia<\/a> is crucial.  We hope Internet users around the world will <a href=\"http:\/\/www.efa.org.au\/news\/200912-efa-newsletter\/\">join it<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Our fellow Internet freedom advocates at Electronic Frontiers Australia are gearing up for an important fight in the new year as the Australian government proposes mandatory national Internet filters with a secret blacklist. EFA is looking for volunteers and colleagues &mdash; particularly Australians, but they can use help from outside Australia as well &mdash; to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-99050","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99050","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=99050"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99050\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=99050"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=99050"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=99050"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}