Author: Serkadis

  • Cultural property deal between Egypt and Switzerland

    Earth Times

    Egypt signed an agreement with Switzerland on Wednesday establishing tighter controls on the cross-border movement of cultural property and ancient artifacts.

    The deal will require both countries to ensure that stolen items are not imported and that stricter measures are enacted by customs officers to control the movement of goods.

    “Under the new rules, customs will check if [the item] has proper Egyptian papers, whether it was exported legally,” said Benno Widmer, a legal expert at the Swiss Federal Office of Culture in Bern.

    Requiring an export certificate from the country of origin will make it harder to move stolen precious items across international borders. The measure follows a previous agreement reached several years ago between Bern and Cairo.

  • An Amarna bibliography

    Art Museum Journal (Stan Parchin)

    The endless fascination with ancient Egyptian art and civilization during the revolutionary age of the “heretic” pharaoh Akhenaten (r. 1353-1335 B.C.) and Tutankhamun (r. 1332-1322 B.C.) continues to inspire the publication of quality color-illustrated studies. Suitable for scholars, students and enthusiasts, many are exhibition catalogues authored by respected museum curators, archaeologists and art historians. Most are available in bookstores and through Internet retailers.

    Books are listed under the following headings:

    • General
    • Prelude to Amarna
    • Akhenaten and Nefertiti
    • Tutankhamun
    • Photography of Tutankhamun’s tomb and its contents
  • London Olympics 2012: one big party or one big prison?

    London Olympics 2012: Amputee exercise

    from gamesmonitor, updated 18 April 2010: “By Mike Wells – Security precautions for London 2012 include the construction of a 17.5 km, 5,000volt electric fence, topped with 900 daylight and night vision surveillance cameras spaced at 50 metre intervals. On first sight of the fence you could be forgiven for thinking you had slipped through a wormhole in the space-time continuum to find yourself on the perimeter of a Soviet era Gulag…” more

  • Exhibition: Tutankhamun’s funeral

    SILive (Michael J. Fressola)

    Now that “Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharaohs” is headed this way (opening Friday in the Times Square Discovery Center), it’s the perfect time to attend “Tutankhamun’s Funeral” a small but disproportionately powerful installation at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

    Even people who aren’t keen on ancient Egypt, know that Tutankhamun’s tomb, which came to light in 1922, was the most intact royal cache ever recovered, a haul of solid gold objects, jewelry, clothing, furniture, weaponry, chariots and works of art. Today it fills 13 galleries in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo.

    (In 1979, the touring extravaganza “Treasures of Tutankhamun” was so popular tickets were awarded by lottery. The show taught the Metropolitan and other institutions the art of the modern museum blockbuster.)

    The show has objects (embalming equipment, dishes and plates, water jugs, linen kerchiefs, floral collars and the remains of a meal) recovered in 1907 in a burial pit, not far from Tutankhamun’s tomb, which would not be discovered for another 15 years.

  • Exhibition: Tutankhamun to visit Seattle in 2012

    The Seattle Times (Sandi Doughton)

    Seattle is in for a bout of Tut-mania.

    The Pacific Science Center has announced details of a King Tut exhibit to coincide with the center’s 50th anniversary in 2012.

    The exhibit headed to Seattle is “Tutankhamun: The Golden King and the Great Pharaohs.” It features 50 artifacts from the tomb of the boy king, including the golden sandals placed on his mummified feet. It also includes the largest statue of Tut and dozens of artifacts from 2,000 years of Egyptian history.

    Pacific Science Center has been working for more than a year to land the prize, said board member Warren Buck, chancellor emeritus and physics professor at the University of Washington.

  • Update about Turin anti-racist anarchists trial

    from ainfos, 18 April 2010: Declaration to the court read by one of the Turin anarchist anti-racists arrested on February 23 2010. “Bearing a sense of justice and freedom that has nothing to do with the law, every anarchist makes of his or her life a continuous invitation to struggle against injustice, and therefore to violate the laws that produce such injustice: the life of every anarchist is a long and reiterated ‘instigation to committing crime’…” more

  • Canada: Anti Prison Demo during G20 in Toronto

    from gipfelsoli, 4 April 2010: “On Sunday, June 27 2010 at 5pm there will be a Demonstration Against Prison in Toronto. Anarchists are organizing the demonstration as a part of the larger mobilization in opposition to the G20 meetings. This is a statement of our perspective and intention for the demo, more details to come soon…” more

  • Photo Essay: British Museum, The Egyptian Galleries

    desicritics.org (Dr Bhaskar Dasgupta)

    The Egyptian Galleries in the British Museum are perhaps one of the most visited galleries. No wonder, the displays are just brilliant. Not surprised that Zahi Hawass, the Head of the Egyptian Antiquities Services goes into a catatonic apoplectic fits at the mere mention of the British Museum.

    So what do you see as you enter the gallery? You see perhaps one of the most famous stones in the world.

  • Photo for Today – Rock carvings on New Kalabsha





    A tiny sample of the hundreds of engravings to be found throughout
    the desert areas of the First Cataract and beyond. Many have been
    lost to Lake Nasser. These were rescued, as were examples in
    the Nubia Museum in Aswan.

  • China Is Learning Keynesianism The Hard Way

    (This guest post previously appeared at the author’s blog)

    There is legitimate argument in the United States that a certain level of government spending was justified in 2009. Given the extraordinarily low levels of aggregate demand, high unemployment, high output gap, etc. the government had a certain amount of wriggle room in terms of bolstering the economy via spending without creating harmful levels of inflation.

    Of course, as we all know now, much of this spending was poorly targeted and does little to target the actual problems in the United States (primarily the high level of unemployment), but this was nothing compared to what China has done to its economy.  Although China was suffering from a dramatic slow-down they had few of the problems that were crippling America.  Savings were high, debt levels were low, etc.  But they implemented a massive Keynesian response that is now rippling through an economy that is very much overheating.

    We are now seeing signs that this government spending has resulted in increased mal-investment, rampant speculation and pockets of inflation.  The Chinese are attempting to front-run these issues, but like the U.S. Central Bank over the last 25 years, they are learning how difficult it can be for a Central Banker to thread the needle via monetary operations.  This evening, China implemented a “draconian” measure when the State Council stopped lending for third-home purchases.   China has benefited greatly from their recent move to more capitalist markets, but they are quickly learning the failings of the Keynesian belief that government can solve all problems via spending.  The Chinese market is down a whopping 4.8% overnight and in my opinion, remains the greatest threat to the global recovery.  GMO appears to agree.

    chart

    Read more market commentary at The Pragmatic Capitalist >

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • You Could Not Make It Up: Volcanic ash cloud: Global warming may trigger more volcanoes: Updated by Piers Corbyn

    Article Tags: Updated, You could not make it up

    Climate change could spark more ”hazardous” geological events such as volcanoes, earthquakes and landslides, scientists have warned.

    In papers published by the Royal Society, researchers warned that melting ice, sea level rises and even increasingly heavy storms and rainfall – predicted consequences of rising temperatures – could affect the Earth’s crust.

    Even small changes in the environment could trigger activity such as earthquakes and tsunamis.

    And some evidence suggests the consequences of climate change were already having an impact on geological activity in places such as Alaska, researchers writing in the journal the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A said.

    Updated below in the comments section by Piers Corbyn

    Source: telegraph.co.uk

    Read in full with comments »   


  • Adobe Flash Player 10.1 and AIR 2.0 for Android Enter Private Beta

    Adobe has just announced that it has begun beta-testing the Adobe Flash Player 10.1 and Adobe AIR 2.0 for Android. The two pieces of software are in private testing for now, but the betas will be opened up to the public at some point. Adobe couldn’t specify a precise date for the public betas. At the same time, the releases of both Flash Player 10.1 and AIR 2.0 for Android, BlackBerry and Palm WebOS devices have been pushed back to the second half of the year, after initially beings scheduled … (read more)

  • This Isn’t Just About Finance, Oil’s Down To $81

    To be clear, investors’ new found skittishness is not limited to finance.

    The clearest way to see that is to look at the price of oil, which just a week ago seemed to be making a bee-line to $90/barrel.

    Today? $81.

    chart

    Meanwhile, if you haven’t seen, the Shanghai Composite fell around 4%.

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • Everything’s Selling Off, S&P Futures Down 7

    This is the scene with about 4 hours to go before the opening bell. Everything’s down. Dow futures are off about 50. S&P futures are off about 7. The news is dominated by Goldman Sachs and the volcano still. Don’t expect that to change.

    chart

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • Diferente

    Diferentele intre femei si barbati ?
    S-au scris carti in legatura cu acest subiect insa una dintre cele mai mari diferente este aceasta : femeile i-au decizii in functie de ceea ce simt (partea “emotionala” a creierului) in timp ce barbatii se bazeaza pe logica (partea “logica” a creierului).

    Din acest motiv barbatii, de cele mai multe ori, nu inteleg femeile !
    Un caz concret : o femeie foarte frumoasa, inteligenta, care poate avea orice barbat vrea, are o relatie cu un “personaj” urat, fara bani, si care, din punct de vedere al barbatilor n-ar putea iesi in oras nici cu un cactus.

    Barbatul (partea logica) : “Ce proasta ! Uita-te cu cine iese ! Un “terminat” fara bani, fara loc de munca si pe langa toate mai arata si ca ce vomit eu cand beau prea mult …O terminata de masina are, dar o face pe saraca fata sa mearga pe jos … Bani nu are … O scoate in oras doar cand mai apare o eclipsa de luna sau de soare… Apropo de raschitura aia de masina! Macar atat! Merge dupa ea si stau in masina pana se plictisesc. Ce mai… Isi merita soarta!”

    Femeia (partea emotionala) : “Ies cu X de 2 luni. Stiu ca nu are bani, loc de munca sau ca nu arata prea bine. Dar imi place cum ma simt in preajma lui. De fiecare data cand sunt cu el parca uit de toate problemele. Are grija de mine. Nu e genul ala patetic care sa ma pupe in fund din 5 in 5 minute, care sa-mi faca cadouri scumpe, sa ma plimbe cu nu stiu ce masina scumpa prin nu stiu ce cluburi selecte …
    Se gandeste mereu la mine si cand ma astept mai putin imi spune ca ma iubeste. Stie cand gresesc si nu se teme sa ma pune la punct.Nu ii pasa de ce cred ce-i din jurul lui… Desi are o perioada mai proasta stiu ca are potential si poate sa faca lucruri marete, iar eu o sa stau langa sa-l ajut …”

    Concluziile le trageti singuri !

    P.S Inca un exemplu pentru ceea ce am spus. Clipul este din filmul «Sleepless in Seattle». Ea : Povesteste un film si spune ce a simtit cand l-a vazut .
    Ei : Povestesc un film si …fac misto de sentimente :)).
    Urmariti-l pana la capat !

    Trimite si prietenilor:





    Related posts:

    1. Barbati sub papuc
    2. Ziua Femeilor
    3. Gheo
  • Another Facebook Connect Competitor, Meebo’s XAuth

    The web is all about the social component these days. It’s not just the obvious services, Facebook, Twitter and the likes, every site out there is trying to tap into your social graph and extend its functionality based on that. One thing that always happens when a group of people come together is ‘sharing’ information. This is … (read more)

  • Human Chromosome Fusion





    An unusual theory regarding the emergence of modern humanity has been promoted for many years and is occasionally addressed by enthusiasts.  A major source of this theory is Sitchen who has drawn it from his learned interpretation of ancient scriptures.
    As the story goes an advanced alien society on planet X passes this way every few millennia.  They established a presence on Earth motivated by the need to acquire gold.  Their presence occurs in the earliest scriptures and is commented on.  In order to mine the gold, they chose to upgrade a species of humanoid into modern humanity.
    This first is an extraordinary claim.  After saying that, I observe one other issue.  It is a scriptural interpretation based on a Bronze Age assemblage of writings.  Care must be exercised before we accept anything beyond the basic ideas themselves because of the introduction of cultural inputs.
    It takes no effort to imagine a contact event been written up in the glorious language of a Bronze Age war chief.
    If anything, my own work has actually built additional meat on this skeleton.
    To start with I have posted on the orbit of the sun through the cluster related to Sirius over a 100,000 year or so cycle.  Such a path could easily put us in close contact with an alien civilization each trip.  It would also explain why such a planet X might even be possible.  So a completely far fetched proposition drawn from controversial scriptural interpretations becomes possible to consider.
    I have also additionally posted on the proposition that human ancestors developed a modern population that technically matured over 15,000 years ago during the Ice Age.  They decided to end the Ice Age by inducing a crustal shift and executed accordingly.  In the process they transitioned to space humanity who we recognize today in the form of ET.
    Much of this is supported in scriptural sources and the rest can be built up by inference and physical evidence.  It provides a framework that places modern humanity on Earth after been cloned into existence from our primate ancestors at some early point.  I find 400 K years as unnecessarily long and completely unsupported in the fossil record, yet it cannot be discounted at all Our fossil record is far too scant.
    However, the past twenty thousand years covering the end of the Ice Age works is completely plausible and fills an implied gap in the natural rise of modern humanity.  After all if we have done everything inside of 10,000 years, what were we doing for the previous 70 K at least?
    For all these reasons it becomes plausible that the conversion of our primate precursors to modern humanity may have been accelerated as early as three to five orbital cycles ago or as much as 500,000 years ago.  All evidence would be buried in the tropics and be very deep.  I prefer to accept that the rise of humanity was unaided and to some degree the fossil record supports that interpretation.  Yet the repopulation of the Earth after the crustal shift is recent and was surely done by humans themselves and with any number of local colonies sporting separate racial types.
    With this background of interpretation, you are equipped to read this item prepared by Michael Tellinger who is preparing a book on the subject.  It has taken myself years to assemble the sources and resolve underlying issues to put together an internally possible history that is not instantly in contravention of physical science and probabilities.  So while I am not thrilled to see time pushed back over half a million years when I can get it all done inside the 100,000 years that the fossil record presently gives us, I am also cognizant of the reality that earlier has always proven better.
    I underline what I find helpful.
    The idea that humanity was created as a slave to work comes out through the cultural lens of Sumerian Tablets.  A better interpretation is that we were engineered to complete the task of terraforming the Earth and that is the purpose we live for.  If in fact we caused the crust to shift, then we are well on the way to completing the task.  I am also not convinced that the gold aspect of the tale I anything more than a cultural artifact.
    Here is another edition of my weekly article series. We explore evidence of genetic manipulation of the earliest humans. I will keep the articles as fresh and up to date with the latest scientific discoveries as possible. I hope to point out to you where this new information is slipping through the cracks of mainstream scholars and academics, while it supports many of the so-called outlandish theories about our human origins. Enjoy the read and please register your friends that may also have similar interests at the end of the article.
    Chromosome Fusion
    Evidence of DNA manipulation in our distant past?
    The Human Genome Project has dished up some real surprises to scientists. The first surprise was the vast percentage of the human DNA that is inactive. It is estimated that at least 97% of our DNA is in actual fact a waste of space, as it does not contain any active genes that actually carry the code for any of our physical makeup. Then within the genes there are Introns – parts that do not carry any code; and Exons – sections that carry some sort of genetic code.  The full length of our DNA is made up of some 20 000 genes that have now been identified. These genes carry the blueprint for the structure of our entire body. What is very puzzling is the fact that Homo sapiens, as the supposed pinnacle if civilized evolution on this planet, should have such large parts of unused DNA. We seem to have the longest DNA molecule among all other species, but we use the smallest part of it in proportion to the other species. In other words, all the other creatures use much more of their DNA than humans do. Some species use as much as 98% of their DNA.
    This flies directly in the face of the principles of evolution. Humans should have the most complex and evolved DNA of all creatures, to have reached levels of civilization seemingly much higher than any other species on Earth over millions of years of evolution. What is even more curious is the predicted number of genes in species. The numbers seem to increase steadily from basic organisms to the most advanced. We would expect that humans should end up having most genes, but strangely this is not the case. Here are some examples of the predictions for total number of genes in species. Fruit Fly 21 000; Zebrafish 50 000; Chicken 76 000; Mouse 81 000; Chimp 130 000; Human 68 000.
    Can you see the problem here? The Chimp is supposed to be our closest known genetic relative and yet it has almost twice as many genes as humans. New research has revealed that Dolphin DNA is very closely related to humans. This will not be surprising to those who have studied the work of Drumvalo Malchiezedek.

    But then we get to the anomaly of the chromosomes. Our DNA is broken up into 23 pairs of chromosomes. By comparison, all apes have 24 pairs. One would expect that Homo erectus, our immediate evolutionary precursor would then also have had 24 chromosome pairs.

    In April 2005, researchers from the National Human Genome Research Institute announced that “A detailed analysis of chromosomes 2 and 4 has detected the largest “gene deserts” known in the human genome and uncovered more evidence that human chromosome 2 arose from the fusion of two ancestral ape chromosomes” as reported in Nature. It is also the second largest chromosome we possess and it seems to make no sense why 2 primordial chromosomes should have merged to make us human, if this new chromosome gives us no apparent advantage for survival.
    So when we read in the Sumerian tablets that humans were cloned as a sub-species between Homo erectus and a more advanced human-like species that arrived on Earth some 445 000 years ago, it suddenly makes a little bit more sense. The tablets describe how our maker removed certain parts of the “Tree of life” to trim the ability of the new “creature” and how they struggled to make the perfect “primitive worker” so that it could understand commands but not be too smart to question their existence. Similar suggestions of genetic cloning are made in The Koran and Hindu Laws of Manu. 
    The Koran:
    •         Ya Sin: “Is man not aware that We created him from a little germ?”
    •         The Believers – God says almost verbatim what the Sumerian tablets tell us. “We first created man from an essence of clay; then placed him a living germ in a secure enclosure. The germ we made a clot of blood, and the clot a lump of flesh. This we fashioned into bones, then clothed the bones with flesh…”
    Laws of Manu:
    •         19. But from minute body (-framing) particles of these seven very powerful Purushas springs this (world), the perishable from the imperishable.
    •         20. Among them each succeeding (element) acquires the quality of the preceding one, and whatever place (in the sequence) each of them occupies, even so many qualities it is declared to possess.
    Notice the reference to “We” by the creator. The cloning of humans as a more primitive worker or “lulu amelu” suddenly does not seem so far fetched and the strange genetic anomalies seem to support some genetic manipulation in our distant past. The modern-day researchers go further to say that this “fusion” of our chromosome 2, is what makes us human.
    Are we getting closer to proving that humans were created by his MAKER as slaves to work in the early gold mines on Earth? It certainly seems like it.
    Please click here to share my articles with your friends who you know will appreciate them.
    Keep Exploring
    Michael Tellinger.
  • Governor General Michaelle Jean Attacks Contemporary Slavery





    Up to about a year or so ago, I also thought that slavery had been largely outlawed and stamped out worldwide.  After all that is what we have all been taught for decades.
    Notwithstanding that the system of mandatory service without reward for starvation wages as operated by communism was indistinguishable from outright slavery with only the need for private sale eliminated.
    Slavery is an apparent outcome in societies still lacking proper monetization and largely relying on subsistence agriculture.  Often the only source of wealth, meager as it may be, is another’s labor.  So that it lingers in places is really not surprising.
    Then we have criminal slavery in which young women are bought or seized to be placed into the sex trade.  A vulnerable young girl deliberately hooked on drugs in our own culture for the sex trade has been enslaved. Elsewhere it is simply cheaper but the same thing.
    Yet we can at least start with the stamping out of mere economic slavery.  No nation can afford to have any part of its labor force illiterate and largely dependent through simple ignorance.  Yet we have just that is many parts of Africa, parts of India and South east Asia.  This is where slavery still thrives.
    Even developing nations have occasional outbreaks. 
    Anyway, Michelle Jean has brought unwelcome attention to the problem in Senegal which really deserves the attention.
    Plenty of societies and governments continue to ignore the problem and pay lip service to solutions.  The UN needs to be goaded into addressing this particular issue rather than fantasies of global governance.
    GG draws attention for declaring slavery an ongoing practice in Africa
    Fri Apr 16, 5:59 PM
    By Alexander Panetta, The Canadian Press
    GOREE ISLAND, Senegal – First she drew attention in Africa for bluntly declaring that slavery remained widespread, and then Gov. Gen. Michaelle Jean visited a dungeon with a dark past to illustrate her point Friday.
    Jean’s statement about the plight of children in Senegal was widely reported by media in that country, where an in-depth survey has concluded that at least 50,000 boys are being exploited and frequently beaten at their religious schools.
    Her sentiments are supported by a new report from Human Rights Watch, an organization that also describes as “slavery” a common Senegalese custom: Islamic schools that send children out to beg for money all day, then often beat them when they don’t return with enough cash.
    The country’s so-called talibes, boys as young as four, can be seen wandering through traffic in tattered clothes and pleading for money. Because charity is considered a religious duty, people hand over enough donations to make the schoolmasters wealthy by local standards.
    Jean’s visit made the front page of several newspapers Friday.
    “Exploitation of Children In Senegal: Michaelle Jean Calls It Slavery,” was one headline in Le Quotidien newspaper, the day after Jean surprised some journalists at the presidential palace by making that assessment at a joint press conference with the country’s president.
    Human-rights groups estimate that as many as 27 million people live in modern-day slavery – and that there are more slaves in the world now than at any point in human history.
    They include unpaid labourers who work for room and board, women forced into the sex trade, underage soldiers, and child workers who are paid a pittance.
    The UN’s High Commission on Human Rights has suggested a variety of means to fight the problem, including product boycotts and mandatory labelling of goods in industries – like carpet-weaving – where child exploitation has been a problem.
    This week’s report on Senegal by Human Rights Watch urged the Senegalese government to better regulate religious schools, which are popular because they offer the promise of a free education.
    As she visited a former slave-trading centre Friday, Jean used the occasion to illustrate her point for the second day in a row.
    She was received jubilantly by dancing and singing locals on Goree Island. Now a pastel-coloured tourist destination and UN World Heritage Site, the French used this island to imprison slaves traded for guns and alcohol.
    Jean toured the former prison where slaves were once chained to walls by their necks; where children were crammed, in the words of her tour guide, “like fish in a sardine can,” with 150 kids crowded into a separate dungeon half the size of a bowling alley; where men were sold for the price of a barrel of rum, while women fetched the same price if they had attractive physical attributes.
    “These captives were not considered human beings,” said Jean’s guide, Eloi Coly.
    “They were considered merchandise.”
    People had their names taken away, and were assigned a number. They were marched down a stone hallway through the infamous “Door of No Return,” then loaded onto ships that carried them on a three-month – often fatal – journey to the new world.
    A teary-eyed Jean, after the tour, said descendents of former slaves and former slave-owners can work together today on a common cause: ending modern-day slavery.
    “This place is not about the history of black peoples. It’s about us all,” Jean told Canadian and Senegalese journalists.
    “Whether we are of European descent, and probably related to those who committed that crime of slavery and slave trade, or whether we are of African descent, we all belong to that history.”
    She delivered a similarly contemporary message four years ago during a visit to Ghana. During a visit to a similar prison there, she knelt on the ground and broke into sobs, then waved off a question about what special meaning the place carried for someone like her, the descendant of African slaves.
    Jean repeated Friday that it would be a mistake to view slavery uniquely through the prism of African history.
    “It’s about us all. And it’s about how life can triumph over barbarism. And we must stand together today, to really fight every situation that denies rights, dignity and humanity to people in the world today. Slavery is still a fact today, in so many different ways,” she said.
    “Human-trafficking, injustices, are still a reality today. But we are together – and we can say no to it. It’s a responsibility.”
    On Friday, Jean also addressed a school where Canadian aid money has helped train young Senegalese journalists over the years and, on the second full day of her 10-day trip to Africa, she met with a women’s group after touring Goree’s House of Slaves.
    Just outside that old prison, young Amadou Guisse spends the whole day working. He started three years ago, when he was only 10. Guisse follows tourists onto a ferry and, to earn a few dollars on the ride back and forth from the capital, Dakar, he goes around the boat urging tourists to let him shine their shoes.
    Guisse shook his head when asked whether he keeps any of the money he earns.
    “It’s for my family,” he said. “Everything.”
  • Gods and Monsters





    In case you wondered what is wrong with airborne assault this should make it pretty clear.  The actual decision is not been make by the officer in charge on the ground with his eyeballs fully engaged on the target.
    Instead he is dependent on a subordinate totally.
    Mistakes are always made in war.  This merely makes those mistakes many times more probable.  All the events described were completely avoidable by having boots on the ground.
    Let us be more specific.  The body language of a combatant is obvious if you are close enough.  The body language of a person at a wedding is completely different.  That it cannot be determined from the air is surely well proven.
    Air power is not in the business of been light infantry but are supposed to be in the business of providing close support under the direction of such.  Training protocols should have that spelled out.
    Instead we get a video of a couple of sky jockeys with obviously itchy trigger fingers opening up on a mob of folks.  No military doctrine that I am aware of would have a gaggle of enemy combatants clump together unless it was at a whore house.  They would immediately space themselves out.  In fact that would be a strong indication of enemies.
    We have the plentiful air power.  Is close support with ground units as SOP really too difficult?  Or are these guys so bored that wishful thinking takes over?
    Gods and Monsters 
    Fighting American Wars From On High 
    The Greeks had it right.  When you live on Mount Olympus, your view of humanity is qualitatively different.  The Greek gods, after all, lied to, stole from, lusted for, and punished humanity without mercy, while taking the planet for a spin in a manner that we mortals would consider amoral, if not immoral.  And it didn’t bother them a bit.  They felt — so Greek mythology tells us — remarkably free to intervene from the heights in the affairs of whichever mortals caught their attention and, in the process, to do whatever took their fancy without thinking much about the nature of human lives.  If they sometimes felt sympathy for the mortals whose lives they repeatedly threw into havoc, they were incapable of real empathy.  Such is the nature of the world when your view is the Olympian one and what you see from the heights are so many barely distinguishable mammals scurrying below.  The details of their petty lives naturally blur and seem less than important.
    In the last week, we’ve seen — literally viewed — a modern example of what it means in our day to act from the heights, and we’ve read about another striking example of the same.  The website WikiLeaks released a decrypted July 2007 video of two U.S. Apache helicopters attacking Iraqis on a street in Baghdad.  At least 12 Iraqis, including two employees of the news agency Reuters, a photographer and his driver, were killed in the incident, and two children in the vehicle of a good Samaritan who stopped to pick up casualties and died in the process, were also wounded.
    Without a doubt, that video is a remarkable 17-minute demo of how to efficiently slaughter tiny beings milling about below.  There is no way American helicopter crews could know just who was walking down there — Sunni or Shiite, insurgent or shopper, Baghdadis with intent to harm Americans or Baghdadis paying little attention to two of the helicopters then so regularly buzzing the city.  Were they killers, guards, bank clerks, unemployed idlers, Baathist Party members, religious fanatics, café owners?  Who could tell from such a height?  But the details mattered little.
    The Reuters cameraman crouches behind a building looking, camera first, around a corner, and you hear an American in an Apache yell, “He’s got an RPG!” — mistaking his camera with its long-range lens for a rocket-propelled grenade launcher.  The pilot, of course, doesn’t know that it’s a Reuters photographer down there.  Only we do.  (And when his death did become known, the military carefully buried the video.)
    Along with that video comes a soundtrack in which you hear the Americans check out the rules of engagement (ROE), request permission to fire, and banter about the results.  (“Hahaha. I hit ’em”; “Oh yeah, look at those dead bastards…”; and of the two wounded children, “Well, it’s their fault bringing their kids into a battle.”)  Such callous chit-chat is explained away in media articles here by the need for “psychological distance” of those whose job it is to kill, but in truth that’s undoubtedly the way you talk when you, and only you, have god-like access to the skies and can hover over the rest of humanity, making preparations to wipe out lesser beings.
    Similarly, in pre-dawn darkness on February 12th in Paktia Province, eastern Afghanistan, a U.S. Special Operations team dropped from the skies into a village near Gardez.  There, in a world that couldn’t be more distant from their lives, possibly using an informant’s bad tip, American snipers on rooftops killed an Afghan police officer (“head of intelligence in one of Paktia’s most volatile districts”), his brother, and three women — a pregnant mother of 10, a pregnant mother of six, and a teenager.  They then evidently dug the bullets out of the women’s bodies, bound and gagged their bodies, and filed a report claiming that the dead men were Taliban militants who had murdered the women — “honor killings” — before they arrived. (This was how the American press, generally reliant on military handouts, initially reported the story.)
    Recently, in the face of some good on-the-spot journalism by an unembedded British reporter, this cover-up story ingloriously disintegrated, while U.S. military spokespeople retreated step by step in a series of partial admissions of error, leading to an in-person apology, including the sacrifice of a sheep and $30,000 in compensation payments.
    Ceremonial Evisceration
    Both incidents elicited shock and anger from critics of American war policies.  And both incidentsare shocking.  Probably the most shocking aspect of them, however, is just how humdrum they actually are, even if the public release of video of such events isn’t.  Start with one detail in those Afghan murders, reported in most accounts but little emphasized: what the Americans descended on was a traditional family ceremony.  More than 25 guests had gathered for the naming of a newborn child. 
    In fact, over these last nine-plus years, Afghan (and Iraqi) ceremonies of all sorts have regularly been blasted away.  Keeping a partial tally of wedding parties eradicated by American air power at TomDispatch.com, I had counted five such “incidents” between December 2001 and July 2008.  (A sixth in July 2002 in which possibly 40 Afghan wedding celebrants died and many more were wounded has since come to my attention, as has a seventh in August 2008.)  Nor have other kinds of rites where significant numbers of Afghans gather been immune from attack, including funerals, and now, naming ceremonies.  And keep in mind that these are only the reported incidents in a rural land where much undoubtedly goes unreported.
    Similarly, General Stanley McChrystal, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, recently expressed surprise at a tally since last summer of at least 30 Afghans killed and 80 wounded at checkpoints when U.S. soldiers opened fire on cars.  He said: “We have shot an amazing number of people, but to my knowledge, none has ever proven to be a threat.”  Or consider 36-year-old Mohammed Yonus, a popular imam of a mosque on the outskirts of Kabul, who was killed in his car this January by fire from a passing NATO convoy, which considered his vehicle “threatening.”  His seven-year-old son was in the back seat.
    Or while on the subject of Reuters employees, recall reporter Mazen Tomeizi, a Palestinian producer for the al-Arabiya satellite network of Dubai, who was killed on Haifa Street in central Baghdad in September 2004 by a U.S. helicopter attack.  He was on camera at the time and his blood spattered the lens.  Seif Fouad, a Reuters cameraman, was wounded in the same incident, while a number of bystanders, including a girl, were killed.  Or remember the 17 Iraqi civilians infamously murderedwhen Blackwater employees in a convoy began firing in Nissour Square in Baghdad on September 16, 2007.  Or the missiles regularly shot from U.S. helicopters and unmanned aerial drones into the heavily populated Shiite slum of Sadr City back in 2007-08.  Or the Iraqis regularly killed at checkpoints in the years since the invasion of 2003.  Or, for that matter, the first moments of that invasion on March 20, 2003, when, according toHuman Rights Watch, “dozens” of ordinary Iraqi civilians were killed by the 50 aerial “decapitation strikes” the Bush administration launched against Saddam Hussein and the rest of the Iraqi leadership, missing every one of them.
    This is the indiscriminate nature of killing, no matter how “precise” and “surgical” the weaponry, when war is made by those who command the heavens and descend, as if from Mars, into alien worlds, convinced that they have the power to sort out the good from the bad, even if they can’t tellvillagers from insurgents.  Under these circumstances, death comes in a multitude of disguises — from a great distance via cruise missiles or Predator drones and close in at checkpoints where up-armored American troops, fingers on triggers, have no way of telling a suicide car bomber from a confused or panicked local with a couple of kids in the backseat.  It comes repetitively when U.S. Special Operations forces helicopter into villages after dark looking for terror suspects based on tips from unreliable informants who may be settling local scores of which the Americans are dismally ignorant. It comes repeatedly to Afghan police or Army troops mistaken for the enemy.
    It came not just to a police officer and his brother and family in Paktia Province, but to a “wealthy businessman with construction and security contracts with the nearby American base at Shindand airport” who, along with up to 76 members of his extended family, was slaughtered in such a raid on the village of Azizabad in Herat Province in August 2008.  It came to the family of Awal Khan, an Afghan army artillery commander (away in another province) whose “schoolteacher wife, a 17-year-old daughter named Nadia, a 15-year-old son, Aimal, and his brother, employed by a government department” were killed in April 2009 in a U.S.-led raid in Khost Province in Eastern Afghanistan.  (Another daughter was wounded and the pregnant wife of Khan’s cousin was shot five times in the abdomen.)  It came to 12 Afghans by a roadside near the city of Jalalabad in April 2007 when Marine Special Operations forces, attacked by a suicide bomber, let loose along a ten-mile stretch of road.  Victims included a four-year-old girl, a one-year-old boy, and three elderly villagers.  According to a report by Carlotta Gall of the New York Times, a “16-year-old newly married girl was cut down while she was carrying a bundle of grass to her family’s farmhouse… A 75-year-old man walking to his shop was hit by so many bullets that his son did not recognize the body when he came to the scene.”
    It came in November 2009 to two relatives of Majidullah Qarar, the spokesman for the Minister of Agriculture, who were shot down in cold blood in Ghazni City in another Special Operations night raid.  It came in Uruzgan Province in February 2010 when U.S. Special Forces troops in helicopters struck a convoy of mini-buses, killing up to 27 civilians, including women and children.
    And it came this April 5th in an airstrike in Helmand province in southern Afghanistan in which a residence was hit and four civilians — two women, an elderly man, and a child — were killed along with four men, immediately identified in a NATO press release as “suspected insurgents.” (“Insurgents were using the compound as a firing position when combined forces, unaware of the possible presence of civilians, directed air assets against it.”) The usual joint investigation with Afghans has been launched and if those four men later morph into “civilians,” the usual apologies will ensue.  (Of course, “suspected insurgents,” too, can have wives, children, and elderly parents or relatives, or simply take over compounds with such inhabitants.)  And it came this Monday morningon the outskirts of Kandahar City, when U.S. troops opened fire on a bus, killing five civilians (including a woman), wounding more, and sparking angry protests.
    Planetary Predators 
    Whether in the skies or patrolling on the ground, Americans know next to nothing of the worlds they are passing above or through.  This is, of course, even more true of the “pilots” who fly our latest wonder weapons, the Predators, Reapers, and other unmanned drones over American battle zones, while sitting at consoles somewhere in the United States.  They are clearly engaged in the most literal of video-game wars, while living the most prosaic of god-like lives.  A sign at Creech Air Force Base in Nevada warns such a drone pilot to “drive carefully” on leaving the base after a work shift “in” Afghanistan or Iraq.  This, it says, is “the most dangerous part of your day.”
    One instructor of drone pilots has described this form of warfare vividly: “Flying a Predator is like a chess game… Because you have a God’s-eye perspective, you need to think a few moves ahead.”  However much you may “think ahead,” though, the tiny, barely distinguishable creatures you’re deciding whether to eradicate certainly don’t inhabit the same universe as you, with your looming needs, troubles, and concerns.
    Here’s the fact of the matter: in the cities, towns, and villages of the distant lands where Americans tend to make war, civilians die regularly and repeatedly at our hands.  Each death may contain its own uniquely nightmarish details, but the overall story remains remarkably repetitious.  Such “incidents” are completely predictable. Even General McChrystal, determined to “protect the population” in Afghanistan as part of his counterinsurgency war, has proven remarkably incapable of changing the nature of our style of warfare.  Curtail air strikes, rein in Special Operations night attacks — none of it will, in the long run, matter.  Put in a nutshell: If you arrive from the heavens, they will die.
    Having watched the video of the death of the 22-year-old Reuters photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen in that July 2007 video, his father said: “At last the truth has been revealed, and I’m satisfied God revealed the truth… If such an incident took place in America, even if an animal were killed like this, what would they do?”
    Putting aside the controversy during the 2008 presidential campaign over the hunting of wolves from helicopters in Alaska, Noor-Eldeen may not have gone far enough.  For that helicopter crew, his son was indeed the wartime equivalent of a hunted animal.  An article on the front page of the New York Times recently captured this perspective, however inadvertently, when, speaking of the CIA’s aerial war over Pakistan’s tribal borderlands, it described the Agency’s unmanned drones as “observing and tracking targets, then unleashing missiles on their quarry.”
    “Quarry” has quite a straightforward definition: “a hunted animal; prey.”  Indeed, the al-Qaeda leaders, Taliban militants, and local civilians in the region are all “prey” which, of course, makes usthe predators. That the majority of drones cruising those skies 24/7 and repeatedly launching their Hellfire missiles are named “Predators” should, then, come as no surprise.
    Americans are unused to being the prey in war and so essentially incapable of imagining what that actually means, day in, day out, year after year.  We prefer to think of their deaths as so many accidents or mistakes — “collateral damage” — when they are the norm, not the exception, not what’s collateral in such wars.  We prefer to imagine ourselves bringing the best (of values and intentions) to a backward, ignorant world and so invariably make ourselves sound far kindlier than we are.  Like the gods of Olympus, we have a tendency to flatter ourselves, even as we continually remake the “rules of engagement,” those ROEs, to suit our changing tastes and needs, while creating a language of war that suits our tender sensibilities about ourselves.
    In this way, for instance, assassination-by-drone has become an ever more central part of the Obama administration’s foreign and war policy, and yet the word “assassination” — with all its negative implications, legal and otherwise — has been displaced by the far more anodyne, more bureaucratic “targeted killing.” In a sense, in fact, what “enhanced interrogation techniques” (aka torture) were to the Bush administration, “targeted killing” is to the Obama administration.
    For the gods, anything is possible.  In the language of Olympian war, for instance, even sitting at a console thousands of miles from the not-quite-humans you are preparing to obliterate can become an act worthy of Homeric praise.  As Greg Jaffe of the Washington Post reported, Colonel Eric Mathewson, the Air Force officer with the most experience with unmanned aircraft, has a new notion of “valor,” a word “which is a part of almost every combat award citation.”  “Valor to me is not risking your life,” he says. “Valor is doing what is right. Valor is about your motivations and the ends that you seek. It is doing what is right for the right reasons.” What the gods do is, by definition, glorious.
    Descending From On High
    And it’s not only the American way of war, but the American way of statecraft that arrives as if from the heavens, ready to impose its own definitions of the good and necessary on the world.  American officials, civilian and military, constantly fly into the embattled (and let’s be blunt: Muslim) regions of the planet to make demands, order, chide, plead, wheedle, cajole, intimidate, threaten, twist arms, and bluster to get our “allies” to do what we most want.
    Our special plenipotentiaries like Richard Holbrooke do this regularly; our secretary of state follows.  Our Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Centcom commander, and Secretary of Defensedescend from the clouds on Islamabad, Kabul, or Baghdad frequently.  Our Vice President careensIraq-wards to help mediate disputes, and even our President, the “heaviest political artillery” (as one analyst called him), recently dropped in for a six-hour visit to “Afghanistan” (actually the hanger of a large American air base and the presidential palace in Kabul).  While there — as Americans papers reported quite proudly — he chided and “pressed” Afghan President Hamid Karzai, offered “pointed criticism” on corruption, and delivered “a tough message.” He then returned to the U.S., only to find, to the surprise and frustration of his top officials, that Karzai — almost immediately accused of being unstable, possibly on drugs, and prone to child-like tantrums — responded bylashing out at his American minders.
    We are, of course, the rational ones, the grown-ups, the good governance team, the incorruptiblecrew who bring enlightenment and democracy to the world, even if, as practical gods, in support of our Afghan war we’re perfectly willing to shore up a corrupt autocrat elsewhere who is willing to lend us an air base (for $60 million a year in rent) to haul in troops and supplies — until he falls.
    All of this is par for the course for the Olympians from North America.  It all seems normal, even benign, except in the rare moments when videos of slaughter begin to circulate.  Looked at from the ground up, however, we undoubtedly seem as petulant as the gods or demiurges of some malign religion, or as the aliens and predators of some horrific sci-fi film — heartless and cold, unfeeling and murderous.  As Safa Chmagh, the brother of one of the Reuters employees who died in the 2007 Apache attack, reportedly said: “The pilot is not human, he’s a monster. What did my brother do? What did his children do? Does the pilot accept his kids to be orphans?”
    As with tales humans tell of the gods, there’s a moral here: If you want it to be otherwise, don’t descend on strange lands armed to the teeth, prepared to occupy, and ready to kill. 
    Tom Engelhardt, co-founder of the American Empire Project, runs the Nation Institute’s TomDispatch.com. He is the author of The End of Victory Culture, a history of the Cold War and beyond, as well as of a novel, The Last Days of Publishing. His latest book, The American Way of War (Haymarket Books), will be published in May.
    [A small bow of thanks and appreciation to TomDispatch regular William Astore, who helped inspire this piece.]
    Copyright 2010 Tom Engelhardt