Author: Campaign For Liberty Blog

  • Report says health care will cover more, cost more

    By Matt Holdridge

    Via the DailyCaller:

    President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul law is getting a mixed verdict in the first comprehensive look by neutral experts: More Americans will be covered, but costs are also going up.

    Economic experts at the Health and Human Services Department concluded in a report issued Thursday that the health care remake will achieve Obama’s aim of expanding health insurance — adding 34 million to the coverage rolls.

    But the analysis also found that the law falls short of the president’s twin goal of controlling runaway costs, raising projected spending by about 1 percent over 10 years. That increase could get bigger, since Medicare cuts in the law may be unrealistic and unsustainable, the report warned.

    It’s a worrisome assessment for Democrats.

    In particular, concerns about Medicare could become a major political liability in the midterm elections. The report projected that Medicare cuts could drive about 15 percent of hospitals and other institutional providers into the red, “possibly jeopardizing access” to care for seniors.

    This comes as no surprise to those who follow free market economics. However, as we’ve seen time and time again, government involvement will only beget more government involvement which causes further distortions in the market.

    The healthcare roller coaster we’re on is far from over. 

  • Against Sanctions on Iran

    By Matt Hawes

    Congressman Paul took to the House floor on Thursday to oppose H.R. 2194,  the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act, and he warned against the war propoganda being spread in the House.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=KdwHN2De33Q  (Thanks to Minnesota Chris!)

    Read his statement officially entered into the record.

  • Eight Republican Senators and Creating Bailouts Forever

    By Deb Wells

    The following eight Republicans have not voiced opposition to Chris Dodd’s “Finance Reform” bill.  Will they be part of the “substantial number of Republicans that will go along with it” that Richard Shelby (R-AL) referred to?

    Will they help Create Bailouts Forever?

    Will they help create a Permanent TARP?

     

    Bob Bennett of Utah (202) 224-5444
    http://bennett.senate.gov/public/

    Susan Collins of Maine (202) 224-2523
    http://collins.senate.gov/public/

    Christopher Bond of Missouri (202) 224-5721
    http://bond.senate.gov/public/

    Saxby Chambliss of Georgia (202) 224-3521
    http://chambliss.senate.gov/public/index.cfm

    Bob Corker of Tennessee (202) 224-3344
    http://corker.senate.gov/public/

    John McCain of Arizona (202) 224-2235
    http://mccain.senate.gov/public/

    Olympia Snowe of Maine (202) 224-5344
    http://snowe.senate.gov/public/

    Scott Brown of Massachusetts (202) 224-4543
    http://scottbrown.senate.gov/public/

    HAVE YOU CALLED, VISITED and FAXED YOUR REPRESENTATIVES TO TELL THEM NO DEAL?

    WE WANT AN AUDIT!  WE WANT AN UP OR DOWN VOTE ON S604!

    http://www.chooseliberty.org/dodd_contact.aspx

    THE REVOLUTION IS NOW

  • C4L News: Taxes

    By Matt Hawes

    Campaign for Liberty’s Kevin Brett reports on where income tax revenues go, proposals to do away with the 16th Amendment and the income tax, and the growing movement for lower taxes and less government.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K84z7VK8-pk

  • Objecting

    By Matt Hawes

    H.T. Right Mind

  • Governor’s Amendments to HB10 Approved by Both Houses

    By dljholt

     

    Dear Friends of Liberty,

    I am happy to report that Governor’s proposed amendments to Bob Marshall’s HB10, the Virginia Healthcare Freedom Act, passed in both Houses yesterday.

    The vote went like this:

    House: 62Y – 34N

    Senate: 29Y – 9N

    A job well done, Patriots!  Thank you for all your hard work and seeing this through to the finish.

     

    Yours in liberty,

    Donna Holt

     

  • More Pretending

    By Matt Hawes

    If you’re not reading Tim Carney on a regular basis, well… you should be!

    From the Washington Examiner,

    President Obama serially wages pretend wars against the special interests. It’s his thing.

    Currently he’s pretending to battle Wall Street. Recently, he pretended to battle the health sector. Last year, he pretended to battle the banks on credit cards. But my favorite episode of Obama pretending to take on industry might be his regulation of tobacco….

    Read the rest.

    Tim’s latest piece deals with Obama’s speech to Wall Street earlier today:

    This is vintage Obama, combining his “scourge-of-the-special-interests” rhetoric with his “can’t-we-all-get-along” talk. First let me point out a couple of problems with the Reformers-vs-Lobbyists frame.

    Goldman is on Obama’s side

    Not on the SEC-civil-suit issue, but on the issue of regulation. Obama today will lay out five principles that need to be in the bill for him to sign it: (1) “transparency” on derivatives, (2) the “Volcker rule,” (3) “consumer financial protection,” (4) pay reforms, and (5) some mechanism to prevent future bailouts.

    Goldman endorsed (1), calling in its annual report for federally requiring derivate clearinghouses. Goldman signaled confidence it could handle (2) the Volcker Rule, because basically all of its trading could be classified as being related to client service. Politico has reported that the big banks are not longer fighting (3) a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, because “Big banks that have been vocal opponents of the agency have decided they have the legal resources to deal with a consumer agency.” Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein has been calling for (4) pay restrictions since last summer. And number (5), ending too-big-to-fail is a pretty loaded topic, but remember what Paul Volcker said last year: simply labeling certain banks as Tier 1 sends a signal to the market that they are too big to fail….

    Read the rest.

    I highly recommend passing along Tim’s work to those you know who are still convinced that “hope and change” have come to Washington.

  • Ron Paul on Hardball

    By Matt Hawes

    Later today, Congressman Paul will be interviewed in studio on MSNBC’s Hardball with Chris Matthews at 5:30 pm eastern. 

    Update:

    Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

     

  • German Troops Challenge Involvement in Afghanistan

    By Matt Hawes

    Via the UK’s Daily Mail:

    German soldiers are wearing their hearts on their sleeves – in the form of a badge that protests their country’s involvement in the war in Afghanistan.

    Some troops have taken to wearing the cloth accessory that states – ironically – ‘I fight for Merkel’ in a bid to persuade the German Chancellor Angela Merkel to explain exactly what they are fighting and dying for.

    Yet, as the Germans question what their friends and family are giving up their lives for, the U.S. is asking them to deepen their commitments.

    Chancellor Merkel is to make a statement to parliament tomorrow. Her spokesman said she wants to make clear her ‘high-esteem’ for the work of the German soldiers in Afghanistan in the light of the recent casualties.

    But she will be speaking in the Reichstag after being put under pressure from U.S. General Stanley McChrystal, who arrived in Germany today with a brief from the White House to get the Germans to do more in Afghanistan.

    With the rise in U.S. pressure to further engage, the German people are sending their own message to their leaders.

    The trouble for Mrs Merkel is that German involvement is deeply unpopular with some 80 per cent of the public, who want the troops to come home. Germany’s disastrous wars of the last century have left its public with a deep pacifistic streak.

    The German press has been swift to condemn the government for its indecisiveness.

    The Financial Times Deutschland said: ‘With every dead German soldier in Afghanistan, the calls for an immediate withdrawal grow louder. This reflex shows that the German public is still not clear about the character of the mission.

    Or, perhaps Germany’s citizens indeed clearly see the mission for what it is: a seemingly never-ending effort to nation-build that continues to cost more lives each day.

    Read the rest.

  • Funny Money

    By Tim Shoemaker

    Newmoney.gov has recently unveiled their modifications to the $100 bill.

    I would have to agree with YAL’s blogger-in-chief Bonnie Kristian, the more changes they make, the more worthless it appears.  H/T Bonnie

  • The Treasury Acts to Stop Private Counterfeiting–But What About the Fed?

    By Doug Bandow

    The U.S. government is worried.  Counterfeiters around the world are at work.  Printing fake greenbacks has become big business.

    So the Treasury has unveiled a new banknote.  Reports the Wall Street Journal:

    Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke unveiled a new $100 bill equipped with two new security features.

    The bill will go into circulation Feb. 10, 2011.

    Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke unveil a new $100 bill equipped with two new security features. The News Hub takes a look at the new bill, which goes into circulation Feb. 10, 2011.

    The Fed, along with the Treasury Department, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing and the U.S. Secret Service, “continuously monitor the counterfeiting threats” for each denomination and redesign decisions are made based on those threats, Mr. Bernanke said.

    “This job has become more complex in recent years as technology advances and U.S. dollar flows expand and increase,” he added.

    The bill-the highest denomination of all U.S. notes-circulates widely around the world, with circulation in the past 25 years growing to $890 billion from $180 billion.

    About two-thirds of all $100 notes circulate outside the U.S.; Mr. Bernanke said the agencies must ensure people around the world are aware of the design change. Over the next several months, officials at the agencies will work to educate cash handlers, consumers and others about the design and explain how to use its security features.

    Benjamin Franklin is still on the latest makeover of the $100 bill, unveiled Wednesday, but he has been joined by a number of security features as part of an effort to stay ahead of counterfeiters.

    The 6.5 billion or so $100 notes in circulation now will remain legal tender, Mr. Bernanke said.

    Okay, so now the counterfeiters will have a harder time.  (Though as long as older notes are legal tender, nothing prevents counterfeiters from faking the old currency.)

    But who’s going to stop the Fed from running the printing presses?  Just like killing is illegal murder when conducted by individuals but legal war when conducted by government, counterfeiting is illegal when private individuals pass the notes onto unsuspecting people but legal when the government forces private individuals to accept its currency as “legal tender.”

    Who’s going to put a stop to legal counterfeiting?

  • Civil Liberties Board? Or Bored of Civil Liberties?

    By Anthony Gregory

    In the Bush era, civil liberties were all the rage. The Democrats pushed back, if only very slightly, against Bush’s powergrabs on surveillance and detention policy. In 2004 a “Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board” was created to help oversee the threats of the war on terror against our constitutional rights. Although this was a hollow shell of real oversight, just another government trick to make us think that “checks and balances” were keeping our freedoms secure, it’s all the more hollow now: Under Obama, the entire board has been vacant this whole time. Thanks to Tom Mullen for the link.

  • Goldman Sachs Embraces Financial Regulation

    By Tim Shoemaker

    Washington Examiner columnist Tim Carney articulates clearly just how Goldman Sachs will benefit from the financial “reform” bill currently under consideration in the Senate.

    There’s a rule of thumb in Washington: Whenever politicians open up a legislative or regulatory debate, the side with the best lobbyist usually wins. Goldman’s clout is not measured so much in terms of lobbying dollars — though I’m sure the firm pays generous fees to its K Street soldiers, notably Dick Gephardt, John Breaux, and Tony Podesta — but in its direct pipeline to the corridors of power.

    Carney highlights several administration officials with close ties to Goldman combined with the $950,000 Goldman executives donated to Obama for America to show that Goldman Sachs will get the regulation they really embrace.

    Politico quoted a Goldman lobbyist Monday saying, “We’re not against regulation. We’re for regulation. We partner with regulators.” At least three times in Goldman’s conference call Tuesday, spokesmen trumpeted the firm’s support for more federal control.

    Goldman reported on the conference call that it holds 15 percent “Tier 1 capital,” meaning it is very liquid and not very risky. Goldman can play it safe, you see, without needing a regulation. But regulations prevent smaller competitors from taking the risks needed to compete with Goldman (and every competitor is smaller).

    Read the rest.

    We’ve all seen this before.  Corporatism at its finest.  Big business is using government to establish regulations meant to “reign in” the excesses of big business.  While in reality, the regulation makes entry into the market place more difficult, resulting in competition being stifled.

  • Campaign for Liberty Iowa Regional Conference

    By Heather D

    From the Iowa Conference home page:

    Celebrate the principles that made this nation great with Ron Paul and several special guests in Des Moines, Iowa on May 14-16, 2010 as we continue working to reclaim the Republic and restore the Constitution.

    C4L’s Iowa Regional Conference will be highlighted by our “Forum on the Future of Conservatism in America,” where our speakers will clearly articulate the need to reduce the size of government, maximize freedom, and return to the Constitution.  This Forum is open to the public.

    We will examine conservatism from historical, constitutional, and moral perspectives and explain why the limited government ideas that created our country and turned this experiment in liberty into the greatest nation the world has ever seen can restore and revitalize our optimism for the future.

    Illinois members have the awesome opportunity to attend 2 different training events in the next few weeks. Our Chicago One Day Activist School will take place  on April 25, followed by the Iowa Regional Conference in Des Moines, Iowa on May 14 – 16.

    Directly following the Conference Training on May 16, Illinois members will meet for our first statewide meeting of the year. This will give us an opportunity to meet face to face and discuss our plans for the coming months. You must make your reservation at the Embassy Suites Hotel by April 23 to receive the Campaign for Liberty special room rate. Please click here for more information on this.

    The Illinois Campaign for Liberty would like to assist members who would like to attend the Iowa Conference, but might not have the means to do so. For information on the Illinois Regional Conference Scholarship Program, please click here. To donate to this effort, please click here.

    You can find the conference agenda here, and registration information here.

    I look forward to meeting you in Chicago on April 25, and again in Des Moines on May 14!


    For Liberty,

    Heather Danielowski


  • Special rate expires this Friday

    By John Tate

    Ron Paul and Campaign for Liberty are coming to the Embassy Suites on the River in downtown Des Moines for our Iowa Regional Conference on May 14-16! Will you join us in taking a stand for freedom?

    Our special discounted rate for Conference attendees who stay at the Embassy Suites is set to expire this Friday, April 23.

    Don’t miss out on this limited time offer!

    Find out more about the Embassy Suites and our Iowa Conference by clicking here.

    Visit the Embassy Suite’s website to register for your C4L room rate directly with the hotel.

    Our Iowa Regional Conference and Forum on the Future of Conservatism will challenge and motivate you, while also equipping you with the tools you need to successfully take back your country, beginning with your own backyard.

    Top-notch grassroots political training delivered by seasoned veterans is available for our lowest price ever – only $59! Classes like the Real Nature of Politics will expose the politicians’ favorite tactics and give you a concise, how-to guide for turning their game against them and pushing back the statists’ agenda while laying the groundwork for sustained success. Register here.

    In addition to our free and open to the public Friday night Freedom Celebration with Ron Paul, our Saturday, May 15 Forum on the Future of Conservatism (also open to the public) will feature speakers including Tom Woods, Robert Murphy, and Mark Mix.

    I’m pleased to announce at this time that former Reagan associate deputy attorney general Bruce Fein will be joining our Forum to discuss a true conservative foreign policy.

    Sign up right away for our grassroots training and join Ron Paul and Campaign for Liberty in Iowa on May 14-16 as we continue our grassroots Revolution to reclaim the Republic and restore the Constitution.

  • GOP Should Adhere to Non-Interventionism

    By Tim Shoemaker

    Doug Bandow, a frequent Campaign for Liberty contributor, has an excellent opinion piece in The Daily Caller today called “Ron Paul challenges GOP’s foreign policy agenda.”  Bandow concisely argues that our current foreign policy (a mere continuation of the Bush Doctrine) will actually leave us less safe, less free, and less prosperous.

    When Politico polled activists and analysts about why the GOP mainstream was hostile to Paul, James Carafano of the Heritage Foundation complained that “The deliberate self-weakening of America is an invitation to disaster.” Carafano argued that Paul failed to fulfill the constitutional obligation to “provide for the common defense” and that the latter’s vision would not keep America “safe, free, and prosperous.”

    Yet Washington’s policy of promiscuous intervention is not providing for America’s “common defense.” Rather, the U.S. is protecting virtually every other nation…

    Indeed, the “Defense Department” has become anything but. Most of America’s forces do nothing to secure the U.S. They instead are employed to remake failed societies, impose Washington’s meddlesome dictates, and subsidize populous and prosperous allies.

    Bandow goes on to give specific examples for precisely why we are left less safe, free, and prosperous.  One that was particularly frightening to consider the ramifications of was this:

    It appears that top Bush administration officials debated launching air strikes against Russian forces during Moscow’s conflict with Georgia.

    Such an action, Bandow points out, could have led to WWIII or worse yet, nuclear confrontation with Russia. “Such are the risks to Americans’ safety when their government plays globocop”, says Bandow.

    It’s time for the GOP to get over their collective amnesia in regards to the 2000 election and realize that Bush was elected running on a humble foreign policy of non-interventionism.

  • Ron Paul – “End Insanity Of The War on Drugs”

    By Matt Hawes

    Be sure to check out Congressman Paul’s new op-ed on CNBC.com dealing with the failures of the federal government’s war on drugs and the resulting increased risk to Americans:

    Many will have the knee-jerk reaction of wanting to see more of a crackdown on illegal drugs. But I have to ask: Haven’t we been cracking down on drugs for several decades only to see the black market flourish and the violence escalate? Could there be a more effective approach?….

    The War on Drugs skews the priorities of law enforcement to the detriment of the public….

    Read the rest.

  • Rigged Against the Little Guy

    By Matt Hawes

    On Monday, Congressman Paul was interviewed on Fox Business’ Varney & Co. concerning financial regulatory reform legislation and how the Federal Reserve and our current regulatory system encourage corruption in our economy.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gkuPJDKThA

  • FDA Wants to Limit America’s Salt Intake

    By Tim Shoemaker

    In the latest example of the nanny state gone wild, the FDA in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, wants to regulate the levels of sodium in processed food in an effort to prevent “thousands of deaths from hypertension and heart disease.” 

    From The Washington Post:

    The government intends to work with the food industry and health experts to reduce sodium gradually over a period of years to adjust the American palate to a less salty diet, according to FDA sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the initiative had not been formally announced.

    Officials have not determined the salt limits. In a complicated undertaking, the FDA would analyze the salt in spaghetti sauces, breads and thousands of other products that make up the $600 billion food and beverage market, sources said. Working with food manufacturers, the government would set limits for salt in these categories, designed to gradually ratchet down sodium consumption. The changes would be calibrated so that consumers barely notice the modification.

    The legal limits would be open to public comment, but administration officials do not think they need additional authority from Congress.[emphasis added]

    Not everyone agrees with the FDA that salt intake leads to health problems…

    Morton Satin, director for technical and regulatory affairs at the Salt Institute, which represents salt producers, said regulation “would be a disaster for the public.” He said that the science regarding sodium is unclear and that consumption does not necessarily lead to health problems.

    “If you consume a lot of salt, you also get rid of a lot of salt — it doesn’t mean it’s an excess,” he said. “I want to make sure they’re basing this on everything that is in the scientific literature, so we don’t end up being guinea pigs because someone thinks they’re doing something good.”

    Read the rest.

    Now personally, I quit using additional salt on my food in college because I realized that most food had enough already and I wanted to enjoy the flavor of food (that wasn’t pre-salted) for what it inherently has.  Nevertheless, humans have an innate taste for salt and it actually is a necessary intake for your body to operate.

    To find out how government has already been tinkering with the salt you ingest, check out this article by Rick Fisk on Lew Rockwell.