Author: Erica Ogg

  • Foxconn nearing new iPhone production, reports point to summer launch

    Reports are coming in that Apple’s chief manufacturing partner in China is hiring like crazy to start producing a new iPhone. On Monday the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg both reported Foxconn is ramping up by recruiting thousands of workers in one of its main Chinese facilities.

    Bloomberg says the hiring began in mid-March at a Zhengzhou factory, that already has 250,000 to 300,000 people, for working on a new Apple device as well as older model iPhones. The Journal says Foxconn has been hiring 10,000 new workers for assembly line production each week since then.

    The Wall Street Journal got a quote from one unnamed Foxconn executive that works at the factory to corroborate the story:

    “We have been very busy recently as we will start mass-producing the new iPhone soon,” said a Zhengzhou-based executive who has direct knowledge of production plans.

    The timing of a prepping a new device for production would point to an earlier introduction than the fall, which the iPhone has seen for the past two years. And that does line up with other reports from earlier this month that Apple is planning on a summer iPhone launch.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Apple set to pay $53M in water-damaged iPhone warranty dispute

    Apple has a policy against replacing water-damaged iOS devices and now it’s going to pay for it. Wired got its hands on a settlement of a class action lawsuit between the company and iPhone and iPod touch owners in San Francisco who say Apple failed to honor their warranties. Apple has agreed to pay $53 million, according to the documents.

    Anyone who’s had to have an iPhone replaced at an Apple Store Genius Bar is familiar with the process of checking for damage, which includes an employee using a tool to see if the device has ever gotten wet. It turns out that the water-detection method may not have provided totally clear-cut evidence. From Wired:

    According to several lawsuits combined in San Francisco, no matter what the problem, Apple refused to honor warranties if a white indicator tape embedded in the phone near the headphone or charging portals had turned pink or red. However, the tape’s maker, 3M, said humidity, and not water contact, could have caused the color to at least turn pink.

    The lawsuit covers older iPhones and iPod touch devices, and the petitioners may get around $200 cash payout each. That might be a somewhat meaningful amount for customers who had to pay for another phone. But the total, $53 million, is a drop in the bucket for a company with about $140 billion on hand.

    Image courtesy of Flickr user JD Hancock via Compfight cc

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • French minister defends AppGratis, lashes out at Apple for app’s removal

    How do you say, “Oh no they didn’t” in French? Because that’s a pretty good (translated) paraphrase of an interview that Fleur Pellerin, minister of digital economy for the French government, gave Thursday. Pellerin is pretty unhappy with Apple’s decision to remove AppGratis — a company based in Paris — from the App Store.

    She called Apple’s decision “brutal” and implied Apple was behaving unethically, according to accounts of her comments. The decision was made “unilaterally and without explanation,” she complained, according to the Financial Timesadding that “this isn’t virtuous and dignified behavior for a company of that scale.”

    Apple’s action may be shocking to Pellerin, but removing an app from the App Store is not uncommon, especially for apps that are breaking the rules. Apple found AppGratis in violation of two iOS developer guidelines. In addition, others have reported – and I have also heard — that AppGratis was selling app makers a guarantee that they could get the app into the top 10 app charts on the App Store, which is a no-no. For its part, AppGratis denies breaking any rules.

    What Pellerin wants is for Apple to renegotiate with AppGratis. But that’s not really how the App Store operates: Apple has final approval (its actions are always unilateral) and clearly reserves the right to police its App Store. However, Apple doesn’t generally ban apps for life. If AppGratis makes changes to its app so it’s not breaking rules, there’s probably a really good chance the app will be reviewed and accepted back for distribution.

    As I wrote yesterday, part of the problem with these kinds of sudden removals is that they come after months or years of violating the rules. Inconsistent guideline enforcement seems to be what Pellerin is really mad about. Because those rules weren’t invoked earlier, AppGratis was able to build a business and collect millions of dollars of investment.

    However, if it makes her feel any better, AppGratis is very unlikely to be the last app of its kind to get dismissed from the App Store. The company is very likely beginning a larger crackdown on app discovery apps that only exist to promote other apps.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Personal assistant iOS app Donna puts your phone to work for you

    Siri, meet Donna.

    Donna is the name of a new iOS app that blends location services, calendaring, reminders and push notifications to embody an actual personal assistant that keeps your schedule for you. It was created by the four founders at San Francisco’s Incredible Labs: former Twitter product lead Kevin Cheng, along with Scott San Filippo, Arshad Tayyeb and Spence Murray, who arrived from Gracenote, DoubleTwist and Netscape, respectively.

    home-radial DonnaSiri is a voice-powered assistant — you ask Siri questions about anything, from directions to making reservations for dinner. Donna’s creators are less focused on search; this app asks the questions and triest to anticipate what you need before you even have to ask what’s next on your personal schedule.

    In developing the app, they talked to personal assistants, executive assistants, and people who employ them to understand the attributes that makes for a good assistant. They didn’t just pick a random woman’s name — the app is named after an iconic television assistant: Donna Moss, the assistant to the Deputy White House Chief of Staff Josh Lyman on The West Wing –  and someone they think reflects the best qualities of a person in that position: proactive, strong, intelligent, Cheng said.
    home-screen Donna

    “Good assistants seem to be people who, you ask them something, and they give the information back to you,” Cheng told me in a call earlier this week. “But really great assistants are the ones that are a step ahead of you and gave you the information before you realized you even needed it.”

    In that way Donna shares similarities with Google Now — which is Android-only at the moment. That’s a search product, but it also uses location and user habits to anticipate what you want. But it doesn’t quite mimic the schedule-keeping of an assistant.

    Putting an app to work for you

    Based on all the stuff she does, it’s clear Donna is intended for really busy people — people who use an app like AnyDO or Wunderlist may see similarities, but with an added proactive element. It takes your appointment details from your phone’s calendar, uses your contacts, your location and the location of where you need to be next to tell you where and when you need to leave to make your next appointment on time. It cuts out fiddling with your phone to figure out directions, the weather or what’s coming next on your calendar.

    It does other things to mimic a real human assistant too: you get a push notification when it’s time to leave for your next meeting; you get an update at the end of the day about what’s on the schedule for tomorrow; and if it’s raining at the location you’re heading too it’ll let you know to bring an umbrella.

    But the app is designed so that you actually don’t spend that much time in it: you simply get a notification for what’s next (or a call, which is in the works). And in order to not be annoying it only notifies you with something that immediately needs your attention — time to leave, time to get on a Skype call or Webex discussion, time to wake up, etc.

    From there it does a lot of work for you: swipe the notification for a conference call and it will not only automatically dial you in, it will put in the conference code and mute you as well — to mimic a personal assistant dialing you in.

    The app is free and the company won’t have any ads in Donna — the info you share with your personal assistant should stay personal, Cheng said — but they do have a business plan in mind: subscription access. But that’s only if they can make themselves “valuable” enough someday to charge, he said.

    Donna is launching in private beta starting Thursday, so you’ll have to sign up for an invitation. Cheng says he hopes to open the app to the public soon after.

    Incredible Labs has raised $2.5 million in seed funding so far from Khosla Ventures, Betaworks, Maynard Webb, Crunchfund, Ashton Kutcher and others.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • The PC market is a horror show right now

    Going into the first quarter of 2013, IDC was projecting a dismal 7.7 percent decline in worldwide PC shipments from the same quarter a year ago. Turns out, they were wrong: the decline of the PC market during the quarter was drastically worse.

    The 76.3 million PCs that did ship between January and March this year were down a whopping 14 percent from the same quarter a year ago. It’s leading the analysts at IDC, who have been monitoring the PC market since 1994, to call it “the worst quarter” it’s seen.

    And, no, it’s not a blip: it’s the fourth quarter in a row that PC shipments have declined.

    The numbers show that people still buy PCs, but not in the quantities of the past. Instead, many people — both businesses and individual consumers — are making the purchase of cheaper, more portable tablets their priority right now.

    All the big PC makers are affected. Lenovo, which is the second-largest PC maker by volume, was the only one of the top 5 firms who didn’t see double-digit units sales declines during the quarter — it pulled even with the same quarter a year ago. Not terrible, but certainly not good.

    Even Apple, which was able to buck the industry trend of the last year and grow Mac sales until the last quarter of 2012, is seeing its laptop and desktop shipments drop off. IDC doesn’t release global numbers for Apple, but in the U.S. its shipments dropped 7.5 percent from the same quarter a year ago.

    But what Apple has going for it is its prescience in seeing this shift to smaller mobile computing coming (and of course helping it along). So when people are opting not to buy a more expensive laptop or desktop, it has the iPad to offer.

    Apple competitors in the PC business have been slow to adjust to this new reality. And even for those who are trying to offer a good tablet experience, it’s not going that well. Microsoft’s attempt to stanch the bleeding with Windows 8 is faring poorly, IDC says:

    “At this point, unfortunately, it seems clear that the Windows 8 launch not only didn’t provide a positive boost to the PC market, but appears to have slowed the market,” said Bob O’Donnell, IDC Program Vice President, Clients and Displays. “While some consumers appreciate the new form factors and touch capabilities of Windows 8, the radical changes to the UI, removal of the familiar Start button and the costs associated with touch PCs have made PCs a less attractive alternative to dedicated tablets and other competitive devices. Microsoft is going to have to make some very tough decisions moving forward if they want to help reinvigorate the PC market.”

    Screen Shot 2013-04-10 at 1.09.53 PM
    Screen Shot 2013-04-10 at 1.10.02 PM

    Image courtesy of Flickr user Alyssa L. Miller via Compfight cc

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Foxconn sales drop could foreshadow Apple earnings

    We’re getting closer to when Apple will report its quarterly results for its sales from January through March.  And we have at least one sign that may shed some light on what to expect on April 23: Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., the parent company of Apple’s most important manufacturing partner, Foxconn, turned in some not-so-great earnings on Wednesday.

    Reuters reported that Hon Hai saw a 19 percent drop in its sales from the same quarter a year ago. It saw sales of about $27 billion for the first quarter of this year, compared to $33.2 billion the same quarter in 2012.

    It is possible that its sales are down because one of its other customers cut its orders way back. Apple is not Foxconn’s only customer; it manufactures hardware for many of the world’s most prominent device makers. But Apple is by far its biggest, thought to be responsible for up to 70 percent of Foxconn’s orders.

    It also makes sense that Apple device orders from Foxconn could be down for the quarter: there was no big new Apple device launch between January and March and therefore no massive ramp up of new devices.

    We’ll find out how much this was or wasn’t a reflection on Apple when it reports its fiscal Q2 results on April 23.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • T-Mobile goes even lower: bring in old iPhone, waive $99 fee for iPhone 5

    If you think zero dollars sounds better than $99, T-Mobile has an iPhone deal for you. Starting on Friday, if you trade in an iPhone 4 or iPhone 4S, the carrier will waive the down payment for a new iPhone 5.

    Friday is also launch day for the T-Mobile iPhone. It is the last of the major U.S. wireless providers to get the iPhone, and as a result is looking for ways to boost its appeal to potential customers beyond its unusual new payment plan structure.

    T-Mobile’s new no-contract payment plans, introduced last month, mean customers can walk out of a store with a new iPhone 5 for $99, with $20 monthly payments for the next  two years. It actually works out to be cheaper than buying an unlocked, full-price iPhone directly from Apple by about $70. The plans are also slightly less pricey than what T-Mobile competitors are offering.

    While the pricing does work out to be slightly cheaper, the fact that T-Mobile is getting the iPhone so late in the game — AT&T has had it for almost six years; Verizon for two, and Sprint for about 18 months — means many customers have already settled in with a provider. T-Mobile’s novel pricing plans are intended to appeal to people who may not otherwise have considered an iPhone or a smartphone; but this trade-in deal also could interest people who are at the end of a contract on an older iPhone and could be tempted to find a carrier offering the best deal.

    The trade-in offer is available to ”well-qualified customers” (those who can pass a credit check) through June 16.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • The multihour iMessage outage (today’s, that is) continues

    Apple’s having yet another services problem and this time it’s affecting one of the core features of iOS devices: iMessage. Since about noon Pacific Time, both Apple’s messaging service and its video chat feature, FaceTime, have been experiencing problems, according to Apple’s Systems Status page.

    iMessage outage

    One thing that’s not clear is how many users are experiencing the problem — many times the status page will identify a percentage. Anecdotally, I know both me and some of my colleagues on the West Coast have had issues with iMessages sending as text messages and coming in out of order, and Twitter users from a variety of areas are complaining.

    While some people may be moderately annoyed by a FaceTime outage, iMessage problems are another story. Messaging is one of the most popular and important features for mobile devices. Sure, text messages can be a backup, but people using iPad or an iPod touch without a data plan don’t have that option. And even for those with a cellular plan that comes with texting, some people are having those come in out of order (“it’s the worst,” a colleague informs me).

    Any company can have a services or cloud outage — many do. But for Apple, a company with a history of problems with services and its cloud-based platform in general, today’s outage is yet another reminder of how much work it has to do.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • AppGratis: Apple approved our iPad app a week before removing iPhone app

    Apple may have removed AppGratis, an app discovery app, from its iOS App Store, but the appmaker’s CEO has a few things to say about it. In a post published to the company’s blog on Tuesday, AppGratis CEO Simon Dawlat denied using prohibited tactics to game the App Store, but he also pointed out one of the problems with Apple’s enormous App Store: a disconnect in the app review process.

    Last weekend Apple removed AppGratis from the App Store for violating two iOS developer guidelines: 2.25 and 5.6, which prohibit, respectively, apps that exist merely to promote or market third-party apps, and apps that use push notifications for marketing or promotional purposes.

    Dawlat’s dismay at the removal stems from the fact that Apple had approved the iPad version of the app for release in the App Store just a week before the iPhone version was officially removed. In his blog post he includes a screenshot of the approval he received from Apple’s app reviewers. As he put it, “This came to us as a very strong validation of the amazing value created by our product for the whole App Store ecosystem, something we were intimately convinced of since the very beginning, and eventually had the opportunity to discuss with Apple, with a positive outcome.”

    Dawlat violated rules. That much is clear. And it’s also true that Apple allowed AppGratis and other apps like it in the store for a long while before doing anything about it. What this situation also highlights is an ongoing issue for the App Store review team: inconsistent decisions.

    It happened quite frequently when the App Store first opened. It’s not as common now, but it still happens with some high profile apps: see the hubbub over the approval of Twitter’s Vine app earlier this year despite graphic content. It appears that inconsistent enforcement of those rules — and individual app reviewers’ interpretation of them — is what caused AppGratis to get approved for an iPad app by two Apple app reviewers, only to have its iPhone app yanked back just days later in a decision by a different reviewer.

    For his part, Dawlat is putting on a brave face and saying his company “is far from finished.”

    The same could be said of Apple’s 800,000 strong App Store and its review team: there’s a lot more that needs to be done to ensure consistent rule enforcement to create the best possible experience for both app users and their developers.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Google Play has more downloads, but iOS still rakes in most of the profits

    Sometime last fall, Apple’s iOS App Store and Google’s Play reached rough parity in the total number of apps they offer for download. But the two mobile app stores remain unequal in other ways: While Google Play accounted for a majority of worldwide mobile app downloads during the first quarter of 2013, Apple continues to rake in almost all the profits: it claimed 74 cents for every dollar spent on apps during the quarter, according to a report by Canalys published Monday.

    This is basically mirroring the dynamic we’ve seen play out between Android handset makers and the iPhone maker: Apple takes in a vast majority of the profits in the smartphone industry while Android device makers sell far more handsets.

    Here’s the stat breakdown on Android versus iOS downloads in the Canalys App Interrogator report:

    Worldwide, Apple’s App Store accounted for the largest indexed proportion of revenue between the four stores, at around 74%, while the Google Play store saw the greatest number of downloads, accounting for about 51% of the stores’ collective total, with Apple close behind.

    Google has a bare majority of downloads, but that will likely get bigger as Android is by far the leading mobile platform by volume. What’s less certain is how quickly Android app downloads will be able to draw away the revenue advantage that Apple (and its developers) so clearly enjoy. Android app downloaders have historically demonstrated a preference for free apps.

    As I wrote earlier this year, Google’s app marketplace is indeed starting to catch up to Apple’s in a variety of metrics, including quality of available apps, better store management and app curation. But the revenue factor is a huge one: as long as developers can continue to count on iOS device owners being more likely to spend money on apps, the longer it will take for the Android platform to attract high-quality, popular and exclusive app hits that make iOS users feel like they’re missing out.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Flurry opens Marketplace, a real-time bidding ad exchange for mobile apps

    Flurry is known for measuring the size of the mobile app market and the effectiveness of mobile advertising, and now it is expanding its ad business. On Tuesday the company plans to unveil Flurry Marketplace, a real-time bidding exchange for ads in mobile apps.

    The company hopes Marketplace will stand out because it is offering app publishers and developers a way to sell their ad inventory while also giving them accurate data about their audience. Flurry’s audience data is the big draw: the company said it has access to information about 300,000 apps used on over 1 billion devices. Flurry claims to have access to the user habits of 90 percent of all active smartphones and tablets in the world.

    The idea is that if publishers understand more about who is using their apps — like parents or college students, for example — and why, they can make better decisions about where to place their ads in real time.

    There are other real-time exchanges for mobile app publishers — like MoPub and Nexage, for example – but those still need outside user data to know how to target your ads.

    Marketplace is the latest in Flurry’s effort to expand its capabilities to be a one-stop shop for serving app developers and publishers. Late last year it raised a $25 million dollar funding round, and already this year it launched one new product, a free crash reporting tool for app makers.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Hey, Tim Cook: We found an executive to run Apple Retail for you

    Ron Johnson is out as CEO of J.C. Penney. After less than two years on the job, it’s not quite clear what the next step would be for him. Luckily for him, it just so happens that Johnson’s former employer, Apple, has an opening for someone with his qualifications: SVP of Retail.

    Yes, that’s Johnson’s old job, the one that he held for more than 10 years. And he was really, really good at it. The establishment of Apple Stores in 2001, which he helped implement, ushered in Apple’s greatest era of prosperity. With the physical stores’ minimalist design that perfectly reflected Apple’s ethos and aesthetic appeal, and a tightly curated range of products for sale, Johnson’s Apple Store concept has attracted millions of visitors each year and inspired many imitators, even among the company’s most direct competitors.

    Granted, that’s partly why he left; to find a new challenge in the post-Steve Jobs era at Apple. But funny enough, Apple hasn’t found anyone to fill the position (at least anyone that would accept the job) that could live up to Johnson’s legacy. It certainly made an effort. But that effort involved hiring John Browett away from the U.K. discount electronics retailer Dixons, and it was a total bust. Browett was let go as SVP of Retail after less than a year; even he now says he was “a bad fit” at the company.

    Johnson has been on the rocks for a while now at J.C. Penney too. The stock has tanked during his tenure.

    Meanwhile, since Browett left in October, there has been no replacement. Cook has reportedly been searching for the right candidate, though it’s curious it has taken this long to find someone to fill such a plum post.

    Perhaps today’s news offers a clue as to what Cook has been waiting for: to make an offer to Johnson.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • AppGratis yanked from iOS App Store for two rule violations

    Over the weekend, a high-profile iOS app for promoting other iOS apps, AppGratis, was removed from the iOS App Store, Apple has just confirmed to GigaOM. The reason: two rule violations, including one that prohibits displaying or promoting other apps, and another that prohibits using push notifications for advertising. It’s the second time in six months a popular app like this has been removed. And AppGratis is very likely not going to be the last of its kind to suffer this fate.

    AppGratis ran afoul of this broad rule in the iOS developer’s guide, known as guideline 2.25: “Apps that display apps other than your own for purchase or promotion in a manner similar to or confusing with the App Store will be rejected.” AppGratis does, in fact, mimic a feature of the App Store: it points users to apps it recommends. It also offers them for free or at steep discounts.

    The second rule violation concerns guideline 5.6: “Apps cannot use Push Notifications to send advertising, promotions, or direct marketing of any kind.” AppGratis uses push notifications to let users of its app know when a new app of the day it is promoting is ready for download.

    It’s true that the iOS App Store is full of similar apps that curate and promote other apps to potential downloaders, but it appears that Apple is continuing an enforcement it began in October 2012, when another popular app for finding iOS apps, App Shopper, was pulled from the store (and hasn’t returned). Apple wouldn’t comment on the reason then, but at the time I was hearing that App Store reviewers were simply continuing an earlier effort to discourage “pay-per-install campaigns” and incentivized downloads that basically game the App Store rankings by running up download numbers somewhat artificially. It now appears that App Shopper’s violation of guideline 2.25 was also an issue.

    Somewhat ironically, one of the app developers that spoke up to defend Apple’s actions at the time was the CEO of AppGratis, Simon Dawlat. He told PocketGamer.biz that AppShopper’s removal was about minimizing low-quality apps:

    “My take is that Apple is shooting for the highest quality possible – just as always,” said Dawlat.

    “Since the inception of companies like AppGratis back in December 2008, many low-quality copycats have emerged in the App Store, trying to make some quick bucks out of poorly engineered apps and content.

    “With [clause] 2.25, Apple is probably trying to prevent the App Store from being spammed with too many app-promoting apps. But for us, it has always been about app curation at a very high level.”

    In that same interview, he spoke of how AppGratis was different from apps like App Shopper because his company was adding “significant value” to the App Store by promoting apps (it makes money from developers that pay to have their apps promoted) and by sending 100 million users to the App Store each year.

    Dawlat has not responded to a request for comment.

    It now appears that App Store gatekeepers and rule enforcers just hadn’t gotten around to AppGratis yet; Apple’s reviewers aren’t known for enforcing immediate and consistent, across-the-board policy due to the sheer number of apps they have to look at. But other apps like App Shopper and AppGratis have also been removed, including Free App of the Day.

    It’s easy to see why Apple doesn’t want the competition from app marketing and curation apps; it also may not want companies like AppGratis profiting off the less-than-ideal search functions of the App Store. One of the reasons apps like AppGratis popped up and continue to thrive, as I wrote for GigaOM Research last year (subscription required), is that they promote developers who couldn’t get noticed in a vast marketplace of 800,000 apps. In many ways, these kinds of app promoters are helping Apple; but they may also be confusing users.

    The takeaway is that other apps the use push notifications for marketing, and those who simply promote other apps will likely be getting a good look from Apple’s app reviewers pretty soon.

    Update, 12 p.m. PT: You may be wondering, as I was, whether an app like Facebook is in danger of being removed for similar reasons. Turns out, it’s not. Facebook does have an App Center that features iOS apps for download within its app, and it also tells users when a friend has downloaded a particular app through push notifications. Both of those technically violate guidelines 2.25 and 5.6. But, as I’m told by people familiar with Apple’s app review process, the company isn’t in the same category as AppGratis because promoting apps is not the sole purpose of Facebook. That puts it in the clear. This is good news for developers, because it indicates that Apple is taking a nuanced approach to its enforcement of these rules.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • The case for the next Apple phone being the iPhone 6, not iPhone 5S

    Former Apple ad man Ken Segall has done some thinking about the tendency to assume that the next iPhone will be called the iPhone 5S — and he thinks it’s a pretty bad idea. He argued in a blog post Thursday why Apple should call the next smartphone it releases next the iPhone 6, no matter what.

    It’s true: even though Apple has released (in order) the iPhone 3GS in 2009, the iPhone 4 in 2010, the iPhone 4S in 2011 and the iPhone 5 in 2012, that doesn’t mean the company has to or will stick with that pattern. We’ve seen with the iPad in the last year that Apple has been unafraid to ditch naming conventions mid-stream and go with more descriptive names instead of numbers: after the iPad and iPad 2 in successive years came the third-generation “new iPad” in early 2012, which was quickly followed by a fourth-generation “iPad with Retina display” in October of the same year. Apple apparently doesn’t necessarily feel bound to tradition with naming its mobile devices.

    One of the reasons Segall thinks “iPhone 5S” is unwise is because it tells potential buyers that it’s an “off year” for Apple innovation. He also says this kind of thinking has been a huge favor to Samsung, which has laid out hundreds of millions of dollars to paint the iPhone as old and behind the times.

    You might be thinking, who cares? It’s just a name. But that’s Segall’s expertise: marketing. Whether or not the naming is supposed to reflect the device’s specs or speed or whatever (we actually don’t know the true meaning of the “S”), it’s critical for selling the product to new customers. As Segall puts it:

    The simplest path is to give each new iPhone a new number and let the improvements speak for themselves. If anyone wants to say that the 7 isn’t as big a leap as the 6, that’s their business. Attempting to calibrate “degree of innovation” in the product name seems like a needless (and self-diminishing) exercise.

    I think it’s safe to say that if you’re looking for a new car, you’re looking for a 2013 model — not a 2012S. What’s important is that you get the latest and greatest.

    And I agree with his take: why lower expectations for a device from the outset by telegraphing to buyers that this year’s device isn’t as new or “innovative” as the one coming in the next year? There are plenty of smartphone reviewers and tech bloggers willing to do that for Apple.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Facebook and Apple: it’s complicated

    iOS is one of the most popular ways to use the Facebook app on mobile devices. Facebook sharing is also integrated into iOS and OS X. Apple and Facebook have a good thing going together. However, things may not be quite as cozy as they seem; the relationship could even be on the rocks if you read between the lines of what Mark Zuckerberg had to say on Thursday.

    Thursday was Facebook’s big day: the rollout of Facebook Home, the first piece of the company’s attempt to be a primary interface for mobile devices. Notably, it’s a launcher for Android phones only. Still, Apple came up a fair amount during the discussion around the unveiling of Facebook’s latest mobile ambitions. Mark Zuckerberg didn’t say anything directly negative about Apple, the iPhone and their partnership, but the two seem to be drifting further apart philosophically.

    Here’s what he said in two interviews published Thursday:

    Zuckerberg may really want Facebook Home to be on the iPhone, but it’s likely never going to happen, and he knows it. Here’s how he avoided saying that in an interview with Fortune:

    We’d love to offer this on iPhone, and we just can’t today, and we will work with Apple to do the best experience that we can within what they want, but I think that a lot of people who really like Facebook — and just judging from the numbers, people are spending a fifth of their time in phones on Facebook, that’s a lot of people. This could really tip things in that direction. We’ll have to see how it plays out.

    He admits that philosophically the team down in Cupertino is pretty different than the hackers in Palo Alto. As he told Wired:

    There are a bunch of companies that try to make every release perfect, and Apple is the best at that. That’s wonderful, but there’s another way of doing things that’s potentially even better over the long term—allow yourself room to experiment and don’t try to make each individual release as polished as possible.

    While Google and Facebook are very much direct competitors, Facebook is actually far more similar to Google. From the same Wired interview:

    We have a pretty good partnership with Apple, but they want to own the whole experience themselves. There aren’t a lot of bridges between us and Google, but we are aligned with their open philosophy.

    Facebook and Apple are friends now but they haven’t always been. It’s pretty easy to see that if Facebook does try to morph this Android launcher into a version of a Facebook mobile operating system some day, it may find itself on a similar trajectory as Apple frenemy-in-chief, Google: once integral iOS partner to just another appmaker on the App Store.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Bike, hike, run: 3 apps to take with you outdoors [video]

    Now that it’s (technically) spring, you’re probably ready to get outside and soak up some vitamin D — I know I am. The iOS App Store is filled with sports and activity apps, but these are three I’ve been using and I recommend: Spotcycle, AllTrails and WalkTracker Pro.

    If you’re into bike-sharing, Spotcycle is an app that will help you find bikes closest to you to rent and show you the closest place to return your rental. The app won’t work everywhere, but it will work in a lot of places: eight countries and two dozen U.S. cities so far. The bikes tracked on Spotcycle are usually part of local public bike-sharing programs; they require memberships, but anyone can sign up.

    AllTrails is basically Yelp for trails: it’s a location-based trail guide that will help you find a trail closest to you that fits your preferences. You can search by type of activity — running, hiking, riding, snowshoeing, rowing, and more — as well as by kid-friendliness and wheelchair accessibility. It also packs a ton of user reviews and tips for those who’ve experienced the trails before.

    And once you’ve found your bike or trail, WalkTracker Pro is a great app you can use to track the distance you cover and the calories you burn.

    The video below will walk you through each app:

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Apple’s massive Jobs-designed future headquarters project is $2B over budget

    Apple’s enormous, modern multibillion dollar new headquarters is running behind schedule and way over budget. Bloomberg Businessweek has the details in a story published Thursday about why the Steve Jobs’ dream campus may turn out to be the most expensive — and fussiest — office building in the world.

    From gigantic pieces of curved glass produced in Europe and flown to Cupertino, to prefabbed supply closets and bathrooms trucked in, as well as 15 acres of trees to be planted and underground roads, the building looks to reflect Apple’s famous attention to detail. But what was supposed to cost $3 billion is now reportedly approaching $5 billion.

    The building will be green and energy efficient, but, Businessweek reports, it’s the “fit and finish” — the extra visual and structural flair — that Jobs’ design calls for that are ballooning the price. Some of the budget-busting stuff stems from typical Jobsian perfectionism: one anecdote involves the decision to bypass the standard (but imperfect) construction method used for concrete ceilings; instead Apple will cast ceiling molds that will be lifted into place, “a far more expensive approach that left one person involved in the project speechless.”

    The opening of the building has been delayed two years until 2016 because the company is said to be working to shave a billion off of the budget. But some investors still aren’t pleased; particularly with the idea of Apple spending on a new building when they could be funneling the money (where else?!) back to shareholders. Says one Apple stock owner quoted in the piece:

    “It would take some convincing for me to understand why $5 billion is the right number for a project like this,” said Keith Goddard, the chief executive of Tulsa-based Capital Advisors, which owns 30,537 shares of Apple. “This is rubbing salt in the wound, to spend at a level that most anyone would say is extravagant, at a time when they’re being so stingy on dividends.”

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Apple has to think different about China

    Apple apologies are rare. Especially ones that come from the CEO.

    Steve Jobs said sorry (sort of) when the iPhone 4 antenna backlash appeared ready to derail the launch with bad press. Tim Cook did the same when Apple Maps’ arrival was greeted last fall with mocking and scorn and threatened to overshadow the iPhone 5′s arrival. Other than that, Apple gets lambasted in the media in many countries for a variety of reasons and the company’s standard response is silence.

    But in China? Rather than the local media and government coming around to the way Apple does business, it seems to be the other way around: Apple is learning its usual playbook for success doesn’t necessarily work there.

    applestorechina

    An iPhone launch in China.

    After a two-week sustained campaign conducted by the country’s government-controlled media outlets against Apple’s repair and warranty service for iPhones that painted the company as “arrogant,” Apple took the very unusual step of having Cook apologize in an open letter to Chinese customers. He also offered a slight change in how the company handles warranties. The Chinese media stood down after Apple’s peace offering, and it does appear that for now, both sides got something good out of the deal.

    Consider the way Apple dealt with a warranty snafu in Italy. In late 2011 country’s consumer protection agency found Apple was violating a law requiring free two-year warranties for all products. Apple was offering one year (its standard policy) and selling AppleCare plans to customers if they wanted more protection. Even with plenty of media coverage, it took several rounds of fines and threats from the government to shut down Apple’s local businesses before Apple complied – over a year later.

    To recap: In China, Apple wasn’t breaking any law, yet it issued a deferential apology. In Italy, it actually ran afoul of the law, a year later fixed its policy with no apology. But whether it’s dealing with security problems, iCloud outages, or potential antitrust matters, the latter situation is far more common for Apple than the former.

    A new dynamic

    The China affair started out in typical fashion for Apple. The company initially responded to the China Central Television report on its iPhone repair policy, saying, ”Apple makes outstanding products … and offers incredible user experience. Our team is always making an effort to exceed customers’ expectations.”

    Most Western media reporters who cover Apple saw that and thought, “sounds about right:” like a lot of companies, Apple’s typical playbook in these situations involves bland statements that give away nothing. But when the People’s Daily paper couldn’t get an interview with an Apple executive, it proceeded to call Apple “arrogant” and sharpened its attacks.

    There’s nothing new or surprising about Apple executives not giving interviews. Its preferred way of interacting with the press is through occasional large, orchestrated media events that are invite-only, carefully crafted statements or background briefings.

    And the notion of Apple being called “arrogant” is also nothing new. What is new is the extremely deferent apology. “We express our sincere apologies for any concerns or misunderstandings this gives consumers,” Cook wrote. Compare that to Jobs’ response to so-called Antennagate: ”This has been blown so out of proportion that it’s incredible” and “when companies get big, people want to tear them down.”

    Tim Cook in January. He has made annual visits to China since becoming CEO. Credit: China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology

    Tim Cook in January. He has made annual visits to China since becoming CEO. Credit: China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology

    But for foreign companies trying to gain a foothold in the Chinese market, the humble apology is actually something of a standard operating procedure for dealing with dissatisfied customers and a nagging Communist Party-controlled media, as Bloomberg noted. The growth potential of the Chinese market is impossible for companies to ignore; Cook believes it will become Apple’s largest market some day and on recent earnings calls has described it as “a very, very important country to us.”

    And the Chinese media clearly also can’t be ignored or asked to wait until Apple is ready to make an announcement — particularly if the outlets are deeply connected to the government that can heavily influence Apple’s fortunes in the country. (China also does not have the kind of grassroots system of support from fan sites and blogs run by the Apple faithful the way it does in the U.S. and other countries.) The situation as it played out this week sets a pretty clear precedent that for Apple to succeed, it’s going to have to get used to this dynamic — and make adjustments.

    A complicated relationship

    Apple isn’t new to China. The two have plenty of history: it provides millions of jobs to Chinese workers through its partnership with Foxconn and other manufacturing companies. So the company is experienced in dealing with industries and government agencies that are not necessarily independent of the country’s ruling party.

    Apple has learned to play the game when it comes to getting new iPhones approved by the nation’s communications authority, getting new carriers to support the iPhone, dealing with the intellectual property laws, getting stores opened, and more. And this is no easy thing to navigate; Apple rival Google has a particularly tortured relationship with China due to a history of censorship and hacking. Apple has also dealt with hacking attacks possibly emanating from the country.

    But as Apple moves to make its No. 2 market its No. 1 market, and the populous country’s citizens into customers, the road there is paved with other forces — state-run media, a government potentially treating Apple as a proxy for its disagreements with the U.S. government – that will mean it’s not just business as usual for Apple.

    Thumbnail courtesy of Flickr user LJR.MIKE via Compfight cc

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • A new iPhone may be on track to arrive this summer

    Apple is reportedly planning to start production on the next generation of the iPhone sometime in the second quarter of 2013, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal. That means production could start anytime from today through the end of June. Apple has made a new iPhone every year since 2007, so the start of production of a new model isn’t a surprise. However, the timing would suggest a launch of the latest iPhone some time this summer — less than a year after the iPhone 5 arrived.

    According to the report, Apple has two different phones in production, the follow-up to the iPhone 5 and the long-rumored low-cost iPhone:

    At the same time, Apple continues to work with its manufacturing partners in Asia on a less expensive iPhone that could be launched as soon as the second half of this year, these people said. The four-inch device will likely use a different casing from the higher-end iPhone. Apple has been working on different color shells for the phone but its plans remain unclear.

    Summer iPhone launches were tradition from the very first iPhone model launched in 2007 through the iPhone 4 in 2010. But for the past two releases Apple has launched its most important product in the fall, which has resulted in gigantic iPhone sales coinciding with the traditional holiday shopping period.

    Should this device does launch in the summer, it still won’t be clear for quite a while after if Apple is simply returning to its former annual mid-year release schedule for the iPhone, or if it’s moving toward a release pattern like what we saw with the iPad in 2012: a new iPad 3 model in March and a new iPad 4 in October.

    However, if two devices do arrive this year, we could be looking at a strategy that we haven’t seen yet from Apple: multiple new iPhones arriving during the same year period and in different price categories.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • MLB’s big bet on mobile apps pays off on Opening Day

    My definition of a great Opening Day: When your team’s pitcher hits a home run and throws a complete game shutout against your archrival. Major League Baseball executives are celebrating a different Opening Day milestone: the skyrocketing popularity of the league’s official mobile app, At Bat. On Tuesday, MLB announced that the At Bat app, which is available for iOS, Android and BlackBerry, was accessed 6 million times on Monday, the first day of baseball’s 2013 season. That’s double the amount of use the app saw on Opening Day 2012.

    The league has offered mobile apps for several years and has continued to attract new app users each season by experimenting with pricing structures, adding new features and most importantly, giving fans ways to access its live and archived content on a phone or tablet. The audience has historically been made up of mostly iOS users, who account for 70 percent of the free At Bat app downloads and 85 percent of the paid app downloads. But MLB’s Advanced Media office, which develops those apps, says Android use has been growing recently.

    Baseball’s mobile app audience is interesting because it’s not like the TV watching audience — MLB apps are not just used by fans who aren’t at a game. MLB has deftly built its online and mobile viewing audience by understanding that and embracing the ubiquity of mobile devices. MLB Advanced Media CEO Bob Bowman — who will be speaking at paidContent Live 2013 this month in New York City — told me recently that for younger fans, the smartphone “is the first screen, not second screen” and that any app the league makes “has to have everything” if they want to engage and keep those fans around for years.

    Today MLB apps can be used as a mobile baseball ticket, and to check in, get coupons for merchandise, order food and even upgrade your seat during the game with MLB mobile apps — and, of course, to watch or listen to games when you’re not near a TV.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.