Author: Ki Mae Heussner

  • Digital learning startup Benchprep expands into video-based software training courses

    When Benchprep launched two years ago (and rebranded from its initial launch as Watermelon Express), it focused only on interactive test prep content. But over time, it spotted an opportunity in providing content for the classes students take before and after the SAT, ACT and other standardized tests. On Monday, the startup is taking a step beyond those basic curriculum classes (algebra, chemistry, etc.) with software training courses delivered via video.

    In addition to the 40 courses on Excel, Adobe and other software tools, the Chicago-based company has rolled out video courses for about 20 other subjects, including college-level math and chemistry.

    The expansion, said Benchprep co-founder Ashish Rangnekar, furthers the startup’s plan to be a one-stop shop for digital learning content for college students.

    “We asked what can we offer them that goes along with their educational life cycle? One of the big things that emerged was software training,” he said.

    He also added that while the company had previously included video in parts of other offerings, expanding into entirely video-based courses is another way they can keep students engaged on mobile, a platform on which they’re already extra active.

    While Rangnekar acknowledged that subject matter content on Benchprep may overlap with content found on Khan Academy and skill-focused content may be similar to that on Udemy or lynda.com, he emphasized that unlike those sites Benchprep is a distributor, not producer of content. For the new software courses, for example, the startup partnered with CompuWorks and the NROC (National Repository of Online Courses). Other content partners include Pearson and O’Reilly. He also said that while other online learning sites offer classes on software like Excel and Adobe, Benchprep’s courses specifically target college students using those tools for classes, not adults hoping for professional advancement.

    Students may be able to access some content from other online learning sites for free or a lower one-off charge. But Benchprep believes its value is as a central location for students to not only access courses that fill a variety of needs but get help evaluating their strengths and weaknesses, as well as recommendations on the courses that will help them progress.

    To drive home that “education-as-a-service” proposition, the company last fall adopted a subscription model in which students pay $30 a month.

    To date, the company has raised $6 million from investors including New Enterprise Associates and says it has 410,000 registered users, 60,000 paying customers and offers more than 200 courses.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Noodle, backed by founder of Princeton Review, buys social education startup Lore

    Noodle, an online recommendation engine for education led by Princeton Review founder John Katzman, has acquired Lore, a small New York-based startup that provides a learning management system for college professors and students.

    When we last wrote about Lore, the company had recently changed its name from Coursekit and was planning to take on Blackboard and other learning management systems with software that was more like a consumer-facing social network for education. Instead of trying to sell to the schools, Lore targets professors and students directly with a free site that lets them create an online community for sharing updates and other comments about content.

    In a post on Noodle’s blog, Katzman, who is the company’s founder and chairman, said:

    “Lore is already the best learning management system; fleshed out with a full suite of assessment, synchronous, and mobile tools, it will be an important part of our efforts. Further, its community shares our core values: to get each student the educational resources that best connect to his or her passions and needs, and then get out of the way.”

    The company also said that both Lore and Noodle will remain free. But Noodle, which lets learners of all ages search for recommendations on tutors, colleges, graduate programs and other educational needs, has additional plans for Lore’s technology.

    According to Inside Higher Ed, Noodle plans to use Lore to build another business model around “Noodle Launch,” a new service intended to help colleges expand deeper into digital education. While he didn’t appear to share too many details, Katzman said it will offer “a la carte” digital services — from instructional design to marketing to a learning management system — that help colleges cut costs while expanding into online learning.

    Given Katzman’s track record — first Princeton Review, then online learning company 2U (formerly 2tor) — Noodle is a company worth watching. Since launching last May, the startup has been relatively quiet, but it looks like the company will have more to share soon.

    Lore, which was founded by a trio of friends who dropped out of the University of Pennsylvania to launch the company, is a TechStars company and has raised about $6 million from investors including the Founder Collective, Peter Thiel and IA Ventures.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Tictrac opens up to help make health tracking more mainstream

    Activity-logging wristbands, sleep trackers, heart rate monitors and the other accoutrements of the growing Quantified Self movement are all well and good. But, for now, it’s mostly just early adopter techies and health geeks who use them, and for the most part they don’t get a big picture view of their aggregated data and underlying patterns.

    But Tictrac has an answer to that in the form of a personal analytics dashboard that it launched in closed beta last year and opened up to the public this week.

    The startup integrates with about 50 APIs to enable people to pull in data from apps like Runkeeper, trackers like Fitbit (see disclosure below) and sleep monitoring tools like Sleepio. Once the data is ingested in Tictrac, users can see easier-to-understand visualizations of each data stream as well identify relationships between the different parts of their lives.

    “Our focus with Tictrac is around bringing together all lifestyle factors with respect to health,” said CEO and founder Martin Blinder. “What affects you in one aspect of your life will affect you in another.”

    Since launching in private beta a year ago, the company has mostly focused on being a consumer web service. But, Blinder said, Tictrac has started working with employers and health and fitness experts to make health tracking more accessible and helpful to those with (or at risk for) chronic conditions. It recently closed a deal with European telecom company Telefonica to support a corporate wellness program and other similar partnerships are likely ahead.

    On the site, Tictrac helps users organize their data around “projects” related to goals like losing weight or lifestyle changes like caring for a newborn. This week, the startup rolled out four new projects for asthma, diabetes, chronic bronchitis and blood pressure. Through those projects, health professionals and fitness coaches can tailor programs for their patients and clients and use the site to assess progress.

    For example, for a patient at risk for diabetes, a doctor could create a project that outlines activity and nutrition recommendations and then follow the patient’s activity, weight loss, eating habits and more.  Because Tictrac allows users to integrate their calendars, travel schedules, email and other non-health data, a doctor monitoring a patient with asthma could use Tictrac to identify potential lifestyle patterns related to when asthma attacks were triggered.

    Other startups and companies are starting to offer more sophisticated and social patient engagement and corporate wellness platforms. And Tictrac isn’t the only company looking to help consumers aggregate their health data to uncover insights. Earlier this month, for example, we reported that WebMD and Qualcomm Life have teamed up to offer a health hub that similarly enables people to sync and analyze data from multiple health tracking tools. But Tictrac (which has only raised an angel round but says it isn’t looking to raise more funding now because it’s earning revenue) is an interesting startup to watch because it makes the data easy to follow, visually compelling and meaningful.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • How Unbound Concepts crunches readability, or how big data could help improve literacy

    It’s easy enough to understand why Curious George books are first grade fare and why Camus is often saved for the 12th grade. But what about all the books in between?

    For the most part, teachers and literacy experts are the ones charged with considering sentence complexity, word difficulty, themes and other characteristics to judge the readability of text. But by turning over much of that analysis to algorithms, startup Unbound Concepts believes it can not only assess more text with more granularity, it can individualize education for K-12 students and potentially even power digital content that adapts to readers, whether they’re in the K-12 classroom or beyond.

    “The idea here is that Google has the biggest corpus of language in the world and they can do things like tell you the difference between pebbles and rocks and Little Rock and Arkansas and the Arc of the Covenant,” said Benjamin Bengfort, the company’s CTO. “We want to be able to do the same thing but instead of our corpus being the web, we want it to be formal literature, particularly K-12 books [and then] medical texts and legal texts.”

    In the short term, the company said, it wants to use its corpus to be able to help teachers identify the best books for each of their students. And that’s an especially big opportunity now given the rise of the Common Core standards in most states and teachers’ increasing need to find content that meets those standards. But, over time, Unbound Concepts has even bigger ambitions for its database of leveled books: as an engine for adaptive digital reading platforms that provide content best matched to student mastery.

    Quantitative content assessments are insufficient

    Launched in 2011, Unbound Concepts is part of New York ed tech accelerator Socratic Labs’ inaugural class of startups. Katie Palencsar, the company’s co-founder and CEO, said the idea for the company grew out of her experiences in education, both as a classroom teacher and school facilitator.

    Trying to find the best books for their students, she said she and other teachers would scramble to ask peers for their opinions, but matching content with the needs of each student can be time-consuming and cumbersome.

    Teachers aren’t left entirely to their own devices; for example, the Lexile Framework for Reading, a widely used educational tool, helps teachers identify appropriate reading content. But it’s based on qualitative factors, like sentence length and syllables per word, instead of the content itself.

    “It’s a difficulty in education,” Palencsar said. “If you’re thinking of readers and what their needs are, you need to consider the semantics and the meaning and the skills.”

    Taking a Netflix approach to predicting reading levels

    The company’s first product, an iOS app called Bookleveler, gives teachers a platform for crowd-sourcing leveling recommendations. From the app, they can scan book ISBNs to see how they ranked on an A-Z reading scale and submit their own reading levels to help instructors. But, the company said, the point of the app was also to amass training data that could lay the groundwork for a more sophisticated analysis engine that now powers an API for predicting book levels as well as an online recommendation tool for educators and publishers. So far, Bookleveler has been downloaded more than 3,500 times and has generated about 35,000 data points — so the startup has a ways to go before its corpus approaches anywhere near Google-sized. But that’s just since the app was launched in October and the company said traction is rising steadily.

    Much like the Netflix Prize challenged engineers to use user ratings to create algorithms for predicting movie ratings, Bengfort said Unbound Concepts uses machine learning and natural language processing to create its Meridien API that predicts levels for K-12 books.  As opposed to traditional quantitative analysis tools (like the Lexile framework) that tend to include less than a dozen factors, he said, Meridien considers 140 features. It analyzes content along quantitative dimensions (sentence depth and breadth, etc.) but also along other vectors, including themes and topics.

    With Unbound Concepts’ tools, for example, a teacher could do a search for a book appropriate for remedial first graders, that features dogs, includes examples of alliteration, involves the theme of camaraderie and hits the right emotional notes. Down the road, Unbound Concepts believes it has a shot at using its database and algorithms to power adaptive learning platforms that assess students’ mastery as they read and serve up the most appropriate content. On that front, the company will have plenty of competition, from publishing companies like McGraw-Hill and Pearson to startups like Knewton. And, along with the quickly crowding field, it will have to prove to educators that it’s more than hype.

    But for now, the company, which has has raised an undisclosed amount of funding and is currently raising more, is focused on the immediate problem of helping teachers get the best content to their students.  It’s getting ready to pitch its technology to publishers, who could license the software to better label books and it could also license that technology directly to schools.

    “The quantitative metrics aren’t going to cut it,” said Bengfort. “We need individualized levels… we want our product to be a research scientist sitting in front of a particular student saying this is a good book for you.”

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • The “Linux” of online learning? edX takes big step toward open source goal

    Since launching early last year, edX, the online learning site backed by Harvard and MIT, has emphasized its plans to be an open-source platform. Last week, in fact, at the SXSWedu education technology conference in Austin, while arguing that it’s good for online learning to have multiple players, edX’s president Anant Agarwal said that edX could be the “Linux” to Coursera’s “Microsoft.”

    Well, on Thursday, the nonprofit took its first big step in that direction with the release of its XBlock SDK, the underlying architecture supporting edX course content.

    On edX, all of the course content, from videos and text to interactive periodic tables and online circuit simulators, is built from XBlock, Agarwal said. By opening up this source code, he continued, developers around the world can now add their own content modules or “blades,” as edX calls them.

    (He said the term “blade” comes from the idea that if the edX platform is like the handle of a razor, the architecture enables developers to plug in different blades.)

    “We were hard-pressed to imagine how one organization could develop all the blades needed for all courses,” said Agarwal. “By making it open, we get the community to develop these blades using the XBlock architecture. In this way, we hope we can very rapidly increase the breadth of the kinds of things that we’re able to support.”

    For now, Agarwal said, they’ve just open-sourced the XBlock software and architecture but over time they plan to open up the rest of the platform through an open-source license. At that point, it will be easier for educators, developers and students around the world to not just contribute new content but integrate with edX in a variety of ways.

    In the last year, massive open online classes (MOOCs) provided by edX, as well as startups Coursera and Udacity, have gained considerable traction. Just yesterday, a California state senator proposed a plan that would enable public universities in the state to award college credit for online classes. Coursera and Udacity have enrolled more students and attracted more headlines but edX’s focus is on providing a high-quality, open learning platform. To date, it says about 675,000 students have enrolled and it has announced partnerships with 12 academic institutions (including Harvard and MIT).

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Online education could get big boost from Calif. bill backing web classes for credit

    Online courses are racking up the cred.  In the last few months, providers of massive open online courses (MOOCs) have won partnerships and pilot programs with universities, as well as credit equivalency approval from the American Council on Education. But a new state bill in California could give online courses even more gravitas.

    In a press conference via Google Hangouts Wednesday, State Sen. Darrell Steinberg introduced a bill that would enable public universities in California to award credit for classes taken online.

    It’s unclear whether the bill will ultimately pass, but it shows that online course providers like Coursera, Udacity, edX and others are being viewed by people outside the Silicon Valley bubble as a real solution to access and cost problems in higher education.

    Even though California’s public higher education system was created to give everyone access to quality education, and has long been a model for other states, the state’s colleges continue to report overcrowding and students say they have trouble getting the courses they need to graduate.

    “The great California system is at a crossroads,” said Steinberg during the press conference. “[This] bill would reshape higher education by bringing together California’s pubic higher education system in partnership … with the technology that we already use to break the bottleneck that prevents students from completing college.”

    Careful to calm concerns that the bill would encourage online education to replace in-classroom instruction or undermine faculty control, Steinberg said his proposal limits the scope to 50 courses that are over-subscribed on campuses and would not mean a shift in funding priorities. He also emphasized that while the online courses could come from a variety of sources, panels comprised of faculty would be responsible for certifying them.

    Sebastian Thrun, the former Stanford University professor and co-founder of Udacity, joined the Google Hangout conference. And though he called the bill “a shift in higher education for the state of California,” he was also careful to describe his company as a “technology provider – we’re not educators.”

    How disruptive will online education be?

    As online education picks up steam across the country – and begins to realize disruptive innovation expert Clayton Christensen’s prediction that half of North American higher education will move online in the next 10 years – providers of online education are careful to downplay the likelihood of another one of Christensen’s predictions: that half of universities may be bankrupt in the next 15 years.

    On a panel last week at SXSWedu, Coursera co-founder Andrew Ng and edX President Anant Agarwal not only rejected Christensen’s prediction, Ng declined to acknowledge that degrees comprised of all MOOC credits could be around the bend. Like Thrun, he talked up Coursera’s role as a “humble hosting platform,” not a startup laying the groundwork for disruption among their peers.

    Online course platforms provide a mechanism for colleges and universities to remain relevant and competitive in a rapidly changing world but they also pose a threat, particularly to middle-of-the-road colleges that can’t offer brand-name degrees or top professors.

    Michelle Rhee-Weise, an education research fellow at the non-profit Innosight Institute, in San Mateo, Calif. said middle-tier schools tend to look to big intro classes as their profit centers but that those are the same classes online education companies like StraighterLine and Altius tend to focus on.

    Still, those “101″-type classes tend not to be where college students have their most memorable educational moments (or where professors want to spend most of their time) and if technology can help students get more access to the classes they need while saving institutions money that can be better spent elsewhere, that’s a good thing.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Meet Neurotrack, the winning health startup at SXSW

    Neurotrack, the startup that took the health prize at this week’s SXSW startup accelerator in Austin, isn’t just a few months or a few years in the making. Elli Kaplan, the company’s CEO, said it’s built on research started 25 years ago.

    That’s when neuroscientists at UC San Diego started the research that would lead to discoveries about how the brain is impacted by Alzheimer’s and possible methods of early detection.  Over the years, that research led to multi-million-dollar grants and longitudinal studies and, ultimately, the recognition that it could become much more.

    “They realized the impact outside the ivory tower and they brought me in,” Kaplan said.  Last spring, the company incorporated and, after a summer at health tech accelerator Rock Health’s Boston program, it launched in October.

    Building on work from neuroscientists Stuart Zola, Elizabeth Buffalo, Eugene Agichtein and Cecelia Manzanares (now at Emory University) and  theories regarding short-term memory and recognition memory, Neurotrack says it can identify patients at risk for developing Alzheimer’s potentially 6 years before the onset of the condition.

    According to the Alzheimer’s Association, about 5.4 million Americans have Alzheimer’s – and that number is expected to rise to 16 million by 2050. But, Kaplan said, most are diagnosed at a late stage.

    “It’s the same thing as what happened with breast cancer before they had the mammogram,” she said. “They’re diagnosing at the equivalent of stage 4, when there’s already irreparable damage.”

    Through a computer-based program connected to an eye-tracking device, patients are monitored as they view pairs of images, some of which are novel and some of which are familiar.  The program evaluates patients’ eye movement and the time spent looking at the familiar and novel images and then generates a score.  Kaplan said that of those who have scored below 50 percent on the test, 100 percent have gone on to receive an Alzheimer’s diagnosis within six years, while none of those scoring above 67 have converted Alzheimer’s.

    Down the line, the company could sell to physicians (after receiving FDA approval), but Kaplan said the immediate plan is to sell to pharmaceutical companies, who can use the test to identify people for clinical trials and develop more effective treatment.

    “One of the biggest issues with Alzheimer’s is that pharmaceutical companies haven’t been able to develop drugs because they can’t diagnose the condition early enough,” she said.

    The company, which is based in Atlanta, has not yet raised funding from venture capitalists but is currently raising an insitutional round. Other interesting health startups that competed in the SXSW accelerator include Docphin, a Rock Health and Startup Health-backed site for healthcare professionals to access and share medical research, TechStars-backed Careport Health, which helps hospitals find appropriate after-care for patients and Care at Hand, another Rock Health company, a mobile system that helps non-clinical home care workers monitor and communicate the health of elderly patients.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Health tech’s monthly checkup: more deals, but less investment in February (infographic)

    Data and analytics companies continue to dominate funding in digital health, but a couple of emerging sectors are starting to gain some traction: brain sensor technologies and diagnostics.

    The overall amount of health tech investment was down in February from the same period last year, but venture capitalists and strategic players in the sector were as active as ever.  Even though funders invested 33 percent less last month than they did the previous year, deal volume nearly doubled. In February of this year, 32 deals closed for a total of $107.95 million invested, compared with 17 deals in February 2012 for $161.51 million.

    Here’s a quick snapshot of activity last month:

    startuphealth_Febv2

    Key takeaways:

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Big data bioinformatics startup Spiral Genetics raises $3M

    Spiral Genetics, a Seattle-based startup that helps researchers and others quickly analyze DNA sequence data, has raised $3 million in its first institutional round of funding.

    The Series A round was led by venture firm DFJ and brings the startup’s total amount raised to $3.7 million. With the new funding, Adina Mangubat, Spiral Genetics co-founder and CEO, said her eight-person team plans to expand product development, as well as sales and marketing.

    Mangubat said that when she and one of her co-founders, Becky Drees, first looked at the field of genomics, their plan was to launch a consumer-focused genetic testing service like 23andme. But as that company started launching its services, they decided to switch tacks.

    “We were looking at the industry and we wanted to do something really impactful that involved genomics and computing,” she said. When they realized the speed and volume with which raw sequence data was being generated, she said, they spotted an opportunity in offering high-performance bioinformatics tools for analyzing it.

    Companies like DNANexus also offer sequence analysis, and others might conduct the analysis in-house, but Mangubat said they envisioned a service that could shrink the turnaround time for researchers and others in industry deluged by data. Last month, Redwood City, Calif.-based Bina Technologies announced the commercial launch of its own genomic analysis platform and similarly touts a faster-than-ever service.

    Mangubat and Drees teamed up with their third co-founder Jeremy Bruestle and started building a computing platform specifically intended to solve this kind of big data problem. Now, the company says, it can analyze a whole human genome in 3 hours, which is about 40 times faster than what it might take others.

    Spiral Genetics’ customers run the gamut from academic researchers to corporations, Mangubat said. For example, while some clients may use their bioinformatics tool to tackle childhood cancer, others in agrigenomics could use it to sequence different strains of corn.

    Along with the new funding, Spiral Genetics announced a new partnership with Omicia, an Emeryville, Calif.-based provider of clinical genome sequence interpretation tools.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Hollywood talent agencies join tech VCs in investment in online learning site CreativeLIVE

    CreativeLIVE, an online learning site that competes with the likes of lynda.com and Udemy, is bringing in a different kind of investor. After raising $7.5 million from Greylock Ventures last October, the Seattle-based company on Monday said it had added about $500,000 more from Hollywood talent giants Creative Artists Agency and William Morris Endeavor, as well as Google Ventures and Crunchfund.

    That doesn’t mean CreativeLIVE students will soon get online directing classes from Ben Affleck or be able to take a virtual acting class from Jennifer Lawrence, but as the online education provider grows, CEO Mika Salmi said its new agency connections will keep its talent pipeline full of authors, politicians and other creative professionals who want to expand their brand online.

    “We pride ourselves in having world-class experts teach our courses,” Salmi said. “As we expand into new topics, we want help sourcing these people.”

    In addition to the new investors, CreativeLIVE said Caterina Fake, founder of Flickr and Hunch and chairman of the board of Etsy, was joining CreativeLIVE’s board as an independent director.

    CreativeLIVE, which has been mostly under-the-rader since launching in 2010, provides both pre-recorded and live online courses in the creative arts, including photography and filmmaking, as well as software development, business and other entrepreneurial topics. In the last year, Salmi said, the company has increased its course catalog by more than 200 percent to offer more than 200 courses, included 15 live classes a month. The company also said revenue climbed 400 percent.

    The backing from Hollywood talent agencies highlights that online courses are becoming an interesting new platform for creative professionals to build their audience and brand. On Udemy, for example, people who have released successful books are able to generate additional income and publicity and those who might otherwise turn to publishing are finding that the web courses can be an easier and faster way to get their content out.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • GE and NFL take the wraps off their $40M research project for tackling concussions

    Amid rising concern about the long-term effects of concussions, GE and the National Football League on Monday unveiled a $40 million research initiative and $20 million “open innovation challenge” aimed at improving the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic brain injuries.

    About a month ago, in the midst of all the Super Bowl hoopla, the organizations said they would take on the issue.  But at a New York event today, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, GE Chairman and CEO Jeff Immelt and GE healthymagination CEO Sue Siegel will share the details.

    The announcement comes on the heels of an football season full of concussion-centric headlines – the league is mired in litigation related to concussions, studies continue to connect long-term brain damage to contact sports and more companies are trying to build concussion-monitoring and -mitigating helmets.

    The NFL no doubt hopes the new initiatives can help boost its reputation. But Siegel, a leading health investor who left Mohr Davidow Ventures last year to lead GE’s healthymagination division, said the research should have wide-ranging impacts. GE already has a big footprint in diagnostic and medical imaging equipment, but the field offers even more opportunity.

    “What a lot of people don’t know is that [traumatic brain injury] is not specific to football,” said Siegel. “It’s a rich area for study so we can understand what it means, be able to prevent it better, be able to diagnose it in a more granular way and monitor people to help with their treatment therapies over time.”

    Not only could the research contribute to applications for other athletics, like women’s soccer, race car driving and equestrian sports, it could have implications for the military and even public health efforts in emerging markets, like parts of Africa, where road accidents are a leading cause of death, Siegel said.

    The four-year $40 million dollar research initiative aims to evaluate and develop next-gen imaging technologies to improve diagnosis, outcome prediction and therapy management for those with mild traumatic brain injury. The project’s advisory board includes top neurosurgeons, sports medicine leaders and brain researchers.

    The $20 million open innovation challenge, which is also supported by Under Armour, focuses on technologies for identifying and managing brain injury as well as new materials that protect against and track brain injury. Siegel said the challenge is open to innovators in all fields and that previous similar challenges targeting cancer and energy efficiency attracted about 500 submissions.

    As more attention turns to concussions and brain injuries, GE and sports leagues aren’t the only parties interested in developing technology to address them. In the last couple of months, startups like Brain Sentry and X2 Biosystems, which use sensors to monitor head impact, have attracted funding from investors.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Lean government? How HHS is following Silicon Valley’s lead

    Government agencies aren’t known for their efficiency, inspiring work spaces or willingness to experiment. (If you’ve ever lived in Washington, DC, you know they can be the exact opposite.)

    But, last year, Bryan Sivak, the CTO and entrepreneur-in-residence at the Department of Health and Human Services, was tapped to bring more Silicon Valley spirit to the massive department. (Prior to working in government, he founded a company that was acquired by Oracle). And it looks like his touch is starting to move the agency further along a startup-inspired track.

    At the SXSW Interactive conference in Austin on Saturday, Sivak said he’s tried to promote a definition of innovation that gives people the “freedom to experiment.”

    “I can teach you how to experiment. I can teach you how to develop a hypothesis. I can teach you how to define some tests that generate some metrics. I can teach you how to analyze those metrics to determine whether or not your test was successful and I can give you the freedom to execute some of these things,” he said. “This is something that’s critical for an entity like the federal government, which is very bureaucratic and structured and all the things we wish it wasn’t in a lot of cases.”

    Sivak isn’t the first to bring lean startup theory to HHS. Sivak’s predecessor Todd Park, co-founder of health tech giants Athenahealth and Castlight and current CTO of the United States, drew on his tech chops to start opening up health data and transforming health care. But here a few of the more recent Silicon Valley-style programs at HHS.

    Yammer-powered social networking

    Getting 90,000 government employees to collaborate is obviously no easy task. But using Yammer, HHS employees across the department now have the opportunity to share ideas and reach out to people up and down the bureaucratic hierarchy through HHSConnect.  Since launching a few months ago, 10,000 of the department’s employees have used the platform with many using it actively, said Sivak.

    Open coworking spaces

    Like many startup CEOs, Sivak said he believes in the “serendipitous collisions” that happen between coworkers who work in open spaces. But in government cubicles, he said, “the only thing you’re going to collide with is air.”  To up the chances of serendipitous in-person collaboration, the department is creating “HHSLabs” – an open, modular, technologically-tricked out work space open to anyone in the agency.  It’s also opening its doors to health startup CEOs and other private sector visitors to DC who want a temporary place to work.

    Internal crowdfunding for resources

    To support entrepreneurial-minded people at HHS who come up with interesting ideas but need people with other skills or resources to get their projects off the ground, Sivak said they’ve created an internal crowdfunding-like site where people can solicit support. Called “HHSFairtrade,” people can post descriptions of their ideas and others across the department can commit needed resources or support. Like Kickstarter, the project only activates once it receives all of the commitments it needs to launch.

    Seed funding for internal innovators

    If it’s a little bit of cash that internal innovators need to test their ideas, Sivak said they can turn to “HHSIgnite.” The program gives department employees small amounts of money to try out new approaches. If the project can show returns in three to six months, he said, it can become a stronger candidate for allocated funds.

    Opening the door to outside entrepreneurs

    More technologists like Park and Sivak are bringing a startup mindset to the public sector, but Sivak knows that many of the country’s most innovative thinkers don’t live inside the Beltway. To tap into their ideas, he said, the department created “HHS Entrepreneurs,”a new program based on the HHS Innovation Fellows program launched last year. One track invites HHS employees to apply to be “internal entrepreneurs” who will work on special team and get extra networking, mentoring and professional development opportunities. But the other track is open to entrepreneurs around the country who would come to HHS to work with internal entrepreneurs for 6 to 12 months on “high risk, high reward” problems, Sivak said.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Eric Ries-backed Neo Innovation launches new fund focused on lean startups

    Neo Innovation, a product design and web development company built on the ‘Lean Startup’ principles promoted by serial entrepreneur and author Eric Ries, is launching a new fund focused on investing in companies committed to the same philosophy.

    On Saturday at the SXSW Interactive conference in Austin, the company is set to announce the creation of a $3-million fund that founder Ian McFarland said is just the first stage of what they plan to be a $30 million fund over the next seven years.

    “We want to apply lean principles to building our fund,” said McFarland. “For the first year, we’re keeping it as a smaller experiment… We want to have a great track record this year and [then grow].”

    The fund is aiming to do about ten investments, with none exceeding $500,000, and it plans to co-invest with others, McFarland said. He added that portfolio companies stand to benefit from Neo’s deep understanding of the lean startup philosophy, as well as its connection to a global community of lean developers and product managers. Ries himself is the company’s General Partner and Joi Ito, director of the MIT Media Lab, is Chairman.

    While the company has a particular familiarity with the social space because a few members formerly worked at Friendster, McFarland said it will look to invest in startups across different verticals. What matters is that the startup demonstrates an awareness and understanding of lean startup principles, he said.

    A year ago at SXSW, the company, a subsidiary of the Japanese company Digital Garage (which is providing financial support for the new fund), launched as New Context. In November, it changed its name to Neo and announced a rebranding. At the time, McFarland told my colleague Eliza Kern, “We’re trying to establish the global brand in the lean startup space.”

    As Eliza reported, in the past year, Neo has purchased several startups to build the company, including Cubox, a Ruby on Rails development team led by Evan Henshaw-Plath, who was the lead architect at Odeo, which later became Twitter; New York-based Proof Innovation Labs; Ruby on Rails software company EdgeCase; and Pivotal Lab’s Singapore branch.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • A wish list for education technology

    Given that I’ve been writing about technology in education for some time, I’ve come to think an awful lot about how kids these days can have it so good. Graphing calculators that actually make math beautiful? Digital notecards that can figure out my biggest knowledge gaps? Easy access to information, people and tools that cater to my interests — whether that’s music, programming or stop motion animation? Count me in.

    This week in particular, at the SXSWedu ed tech conference in Austin, I happily geeked out in panels and conversations about data science, makerspaces, online learning and other movements angling to remake education. But, impressed as I was, I still found myself looking for more conversation and answers to questions about a few themes.

    Much like the SXSW Interactive conference that’s just getting underway, SXSWedu is a choose-your-own adventure experience — there’s another option around every corner and you’re always wondering what you missed. It’s possible other participants got their fill on the following topics, but here’s a wish list of what I hope to hear more about in ed tech — in the year to come and in Austin in 2014.

    Digital equity

    Technology (especially mobile) is marching its way into communities across the country. But, obviously, that doesn’t mean penetration, quality and connectivity are evenly distributed. When I spoke with Edmodo’s VP of engineering Dimon Sicore a few weeks ago, he emphasized the need (and challenge) to develop for the lowest common denominator in schools because while some school districts might have the latest iPads and Macs, others are using outdated technology. In his keynote speech, Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement Jim Shelton cautioned the crowd to be mindful of the potential for technology to exacerbate the gap between kids in richer and poorer communities. And Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates, in his speech, made the important point that uneven access to the Internet needs to be addressed. But, amid presentations from Silicon Valley startups and discussions about pilot programs with the Palo Alto Unified School District, I didn’t hear digital equity issues echoed widely throughout the conference. I wish I did.

    Digital report cards for students

    Data, data, data. Between presentations from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation-backed inBloom and panels on personalized learning and analytics, it was a common refrain. But one of the most compelling ideas I heard all week was about a digital student report card that, like an electronic medical record, would give parents and students a digital record of academic progress. Stephen Coller, a senior program officer at the Gates Foundation, first raised it during a panel on the future of student data, making the point that education could follow health care’s lead when it comes to opening up access to data. But later in the week, I heard Dale Dougherty, founder of MAKE magazine and advocate for more hands-on learning in schools, draw a similar parallel between education and health data. If presented in a meaningful way, data could give parents an unprecedented window into their child’s learning and, while a digital report card seems like little more than idea now, I hope the concept takes off.

    The Four C’s

    STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) subjects get a lot of attention in education — and they should. We’ve all heard the reports about how U.S. students lag the world in those areas and how desperate businesses are for skilled workers. But real-world success doesn’t just come down to the mastery of those subjects, and technology is starting to play an interesting role in encouraging and tracking progress in “softer skills,” like the “four C’s”: creativity, collaboration, community and critical thinking. Scoot & Doodle, a social creativity site that blends the video conferencing capabilities of Skype with the playfulness of Draw Something, and school Makerspaces are starting to give students and teachers opportunities to exercise these skills. Class Dojo is another in-class tool that helps teachers promote and measure non-cognitive skills.  Startups and educators seem to be paying more attention to this area but it seems ripe for so much more.

    More teacher involvement

    According to the Chronicle of Higher Education, 30 percent of this year’s 5,000 attendees came from higher ed, 30 percent were from K-12 education and 30 percent were business folks and policy wonks. But it didn’t feel that way to me (or to others at the event). Most of the people I ran into in lines or who stood up to ask questions during panels seemed to be more technologist than educator.

    This could certainly be because I chose panels that attracted a non-educator audience. But even if the group was 60 percent educator, I’m sure many of those people were not the teachers who will be using this technology in the classroom. As I wrote earlier this week, it became increasingly clear to me during the week that the composition of the conference attendees, like the composition of the ed tech world in general, is varied. The technologists and the educators have different perspectives, different information contexts and different interests. I spoke with a few teachers at the conference (mostly local) but would love to see more at conferences like this and involved in online and offline communities in general.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Designing for health tech? Remember the 7 deadly sins

    Plenty of entrepreneurs are trying to capitalize on the growing consumer and investor interest in digital health, but if you want to snare some money from at least one venture capitalist you might want to keep human vices — like lust, gluttony and greed — in mind.

    At a SXSW Interactive panel Friday on how health tech companies can design products that encourage users to change their behavior, Mayfield Fund managing director Tim Chang said:

    “The way I evaluate a lot of companies now is I look at the design framework. I look at the design framework of the seven deadly sins,” he said. “If an app or service does not tap into one or more of the seven deadly sins, either directly or indirectly, it will not be addicting…I always look along those dimensions.. and see what do those trigger.”

    (If you’re particularly virtuous, or just haven’t though about those sins in a while, they’re lust, gluttony, greed, sloth, wrath, envy and pride.)

    The conversation, which also included Stanford behavioral health expert Stephanie Habif, Basis Science CEO Jeff Holove, and Wired writer Michael Copeland, is clearly relevant these days. Health tracking devices — whether worn on the wrist, clipped to your belt or attached to the body in another way — are flooding the market. But many of these devices, while purchased with the best intentions, end up getting left behind on the dresser (or lost in the wash) after just a couple of weeks because while they generate a lot of data about how far you walked or how well you slept, they don’t necessarily lead to healthier actions.

    Public health has historically followed the logic that if you increase someone’s knowledge and persuade their attitude, you’ll get the behavior change you’re looking for, Habif said, but added “but that very rarely works.”

    “Knowledge is not enough. Health does not happen in a silo. In terms of what I’ve learned over the years, in terms of health behavior theories we’re trying to operationalize for health behavior change, social is very important. Emotion is very important,” she said. “It’s not just enough to infect the brain and implant the knowledge, you have to stir up the desire engine. You have to tap into emotion.”

    Devices and device-compatible health programs hold a lot of promise but, at this point, we don’t know if data tracking actually changes behavior, just that it leads to adherence to the devices, Habif said. But several companies are reporting positive results with programs that use both technology and human interaction (either from expert coaches or peers).

    Chang mentioned Chicago-based Retrofit, which provides a subscription-based weight-loss plan that relies on tracking devices and remote communication with behavior coaches and nutritionists. Diabetes-busting Omada Health is also beginning to find success with a model that pairs digital tools with a social support program in which users communicate with a cohort of people who share health indicators and other factors.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Bill Gates: education needs much more than just 1 percent of R&D spending

    Investments in education technology are beginning to rival the boom in the late 1990s, causing some to wonder if another bubble is brewing.

    But, speaking to a packed auditorium of educators and technologists at the SXSWedu education technology conference in Austin, Bill Gates said that given the impact of education on all other parts of society, investment in the sector is “absolutely not” enough.

    “If you had to say what is the sector of the economy you’d like the most R&D, the most risk-taking in, because any improvement you make benefits all the other areas of the economy and, more from an equity point of view, allows the country to deliver on its promise of equal opportunity, you’d think that education would be a very high R&D sector. It never has been,” according to the co-founder of Microsoft and head of the multi-billion-dollar Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.  “We’re going to have to grow this.”

    Advancements in computing, the growing penetration of technology (particularly mobile devices) and the rise of cloud storage have helped make this a “special time for technology in education,” Gates said.

    But he also acknowledged that in the late 1990s and other periods, the industry similarly thought that technology could make a dent in improving education and the promised revolutionary advancements never happened.

    “Obviously, it begs the question: is it like that time when we were kind of naïve? We can think through that those things weren’t very deep and now it’s pretty obvious that they weren’t going to do that much,” he said. “But there was this belief and so we have to check ourselves and say ‘is it really different this time?’ I think we have data from the early things that really show that it is. It’s just fundamentally very different technology.”

    Digital divide still an issue

    Gates also made the important point that while technology is pushing its way into the hands of more students, the uneven access of Internet access needs to be addressed.

    “People talk about the hardware but, in fact, if we take any reasonable time period, even two years, you’re going to spend more on your Internet connection than you do on that hardware,” he said. “So making sure so that’s either pervasive in the home or public spaces that students have easy access to that becomes pretty important, particularly, if you’re going to expect a lot of ongoing activity outside the classroom.”

    When Gates took the stage, many in the audience rose to give the Microsoft founder and billionaire philanthropist a standing ovation. Over the past few years, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has become a major player in education (clearly evident in the number of sponsored events, banners and panels related to the foundation at SXSWedu). But as the keynote continued, some of the commentary on Twitter turned more critical, highlighting the split composition of the conference attendees and a feeling that Gates didn’t go deep enough into issues that need more attention.

    One ed tech thought leader wrote:

    Another audience member said:

    I agree that while he provided important context around why education technology is growing, I was hoping for more. He didn’t provide the bold statements or visionary messages one might expect from a concluding keynote speaker, and especially one who has supported technology in education as much as Gates and his foundation have.

    But, the reaction to his speech really drove home that the conference, like ed tech at large, includes many stakeholders with different interests and perspectives. While those in the audience closer to technology may have found Gates’ comments lacking, educators who spend more of their time thinking about managing classrooms than big tech trends seemed to think it was a success. The media specialist next to me, for example, said she found Gates’ keynote “very inspiring.”

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Coursera credentials today, full Coursera-powered degrees tomorrow?

    Barely a year into their existence, massive open online course (MOOC) providers, like Coursera EdX and Udacity, are starting to offer certificates that can be put toward university credit. But are full MOOC degrees on the horizon?

    When asked that question by New York Times education reporter Laura Pappano on stage at the SXSWedu education technology conference in Austin Wednesday, Coursera co-founder Andrew Ng gave the diplomatic reply:

    “Coursera isn’t a university. We don’t offer degrees of academic credit. We’re a humble hosting platform.”

    To which Anant Agarwal, president of the nonprofit EdX, quipped: “a very politically correct answer” (drawing a round of laughter from the audience).

    Ng’s response was hardly surprising given Coursera’s reliance on university partners, including Princeton, Brown and 60 other institutions, to populate its site with courses.

    The startup wouldn’t be much of a partner if it planned to take on academia with a degree of its own. But just because Coursera says it doesn’t intend to issue degrees or their equivalent, it doesn’t mean that others don’t eventually plan to do just that.

    Reacting to Ng’s comment, Degreed, a startup that scores and validates learning from all kinds of educational sources, tweeted:

    Building on the rise of nonaccredited courses from sources like the MOOC providers and iTunesU, Degreed’s premise is that as people build skills through informal education providers, they will need an alternative to the traditional degree. Although they don’t share Degreed’s ambitions for “jailbreaking” the college degree, startups LearningJar and Smarterer similarly aim to assess informal education.

    After the onstage conversation, Agarwal told me on the sidelines that he believes that pure MOOC degrees are on their way.

    “Universities are already giving full degrees for online education, for distance online education, so what is different? Extension school programs and online programs are already giving full degrees. So why is this anything special?,” he said.

    EdX, like Coursera, he emphasized, doesn’t want to be a university — “it’s a platform, a portal and a community.” But in the next year, schools will step forward to accept credit equivalency from MOOC providers and some may be willing to award full degrees from credits accrued on those sites, he said. In addition, as the entire value of a traditional degree comes under increased scrutiny, other companies outside academia could step in to validate and provide degree equivalents.

    But even if MOOC-providers like Coursera and EdX are opening the door to alternatives to the traditional university degree, founders of both organizations said they rejected disruptive innovation expert and Harvard Business School professor Clayton Christensen’s assessment that half of universities may be bankrupt in the next fifteen years.

    “I think that would be a tragedy,” said Ng. “I think that there’s something very important, almost sacred about the student-professor relationship.” Instead of online education leading to the replacement of brick-and-mortar education, Ng said his belief is that MOOCs will have the biggest impact on working adults who don’t have a college degree and can use Coursera (or Udacity or EdX) courses to earn credits that they can put towards traditional degrees.

    Agarwal said, “I love Clay Christensen but he’s just flat out wrong.”

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Basis raises $11.5M for health-tracking wristwatch, adds Deepak Chopra to advisory board

    As health-tracking companies battle it out for consumers’ hearts and minds — and wrists — Basis Science has announced that it has raised $11.5 million for its own sensor-based band that monitors a variety of health indicators.

    The Series B round was led by Mayfield Fund and included existing investors, DCM and Norwest Venture Partners. Basis said that Tim Chang, Managing Director at Mayfield, joins its board of directors and technology analyst and active digital health investor Esther Dyson and healthy living expert Deepak Chopra join its advisory board.

    With the new funding, CEO Jef Holove said the company will focus on hiring, especially seeking expertise in cloud services, hardware and software, and scaling its manufacturing.

    The new funding comes as interest in consumer health tracking devices, particularly those that worn on the wrist, is ballooning. Users can choose from the Nike Fuelband to the Jawbone Up to the Fitbit Flex (see disclosure below) to other options.

    At $199, Basis is more expensive than the Up ($129), Fuelband ($149.99) and Flex ($99.95) and it’s bigger than its competitors’ sleek bands, which may be a turn off for those who want to downplay the accessory. But Holove said the Basis band uses four sensors to capture motion, heart rate, perspiration and skin temperature, as opposed to just one (an accelerometer) used by rivals. With those sensors, it can do more than just track activity and calories burned, it can monitor sleep and heart rate as well. He also said that its dashboard, which encourages healthy habits on top of displaying data, is better able to keep users engaged. He previously told GigaOM that, in the future, the company may upsell users on more advanced cloud services that could offer better analytics or more data storage.

    “We believe our foundation… will continue to give a much more comprehensive picture of health than anything else on the market,” Holove said in an email. “As we gain more user feedback, we will also continue to evolve our healthy habits approach to build engagement over time.”

    Disclosure: Fitbit is backed by True Ventures, a venture capital firm that is an investor in the parent company of this blog, Giga Omni Media. Om Malik, founder of Giga Omni Media, is also a venture partner at True.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • The future of digital learning? News Corp.’s Amplify debuts its tablet for K-12 classrooms

    A classroom management tool that lets teachers collect real-time feedback from students. A social platform for sharing class updates and assignments.  A digital textbook comprised of open-source content. In ed tech, there are plenty of startups providing those and other innovative digital learning and instructional tools, but with its new tablet debuted this week, News Corp.’s Amplify aims to roll them all up into one device.

    On Wednesday at the SXSWedu education technology conference in Austin, the company will take the wraps off of its new tablet that it touts as a one-stop shop for K-12 teaching and learning. The announcement comes less than a year after News Corp. announced the creation of Amplify, which builds on technology developed by Wireless Generation, the ed tech company News Corp. acquired in 2010.

    The device, which is a 10-inch Asus tablet running the Jellybean Android operating system, doesn’t just come pre-loaded with content and apps curated by Amplify. The company  said it worked at the manufacturer level to optimize the tablet for use in schools.

    “Simply giving kids hardware or another computer I think is not going to change what’s going on,” Joel Klein, Amplify’s CEO and the former New York City Schools Chancellor told reporters on a press call. “That’s’ why we focused instead on creating a rich, robust learning platform for the school space.”

    Amplify’s tablet, which comes ready for student use out of the box, lets administrators and teachers distribute content across an entire class or grade level, allows teachers to control the control on students’ screens and gives students a digital way to participate in class. To enable those features, the company said, it couldn’t just run its software on any device, it needed to get deeper into the operating system.

    From her tablet, a teacher can see if a student is checking his email instead of following the lesson or block certain apps from running on students’ tablets or shut down digital access altogether with a one-click “eyes on teacher” feature. For teachers who see digital devices as synonymous with distraction, Amplify’s hope is that greater control over student content will encourage adoption.

    The new tablet also builds student feedback into each lesson. Teachers can quickly poll students during class to assess comprehension, view a quick report of who is following along and then route extra content to those that need extra support.

    Additionally, it supports a curated set of apps through Gooru, an education-focused search engine, as well as some apps from Google Play.  Although the product doesn’t launch with analytics dashboards for teachers, over time apps running on the tablet could give teachers and schools a clearer picture of achievement at the individual and broader levels.

    Using various apps and services, schools could enable teachers and students to do some of what Amplify’s tablet can do on regular iPads and Android devices – classroom clickers and startup ClassDojo, for example, provide classroom management tools, social education startup Edmodo provides a platform for sharing content and collaboration and Pearson and McGraw-Hill offer digital textbooks that aim to personalize learning.

    But Amplify’s pitch is that their device gives schools and teachers unrivaled control, as well as a platform for supporting an entire ecosystem of ed tech products and ongoing support and services. Already, the tablet is in the hands of thousands of students piloting the device in districts across the country, the company said.

    As cash-strapped school districts weigh various options for bringing technology into the classroom – from purchasing new iPads, Kindles and Android devices to supporting BYOD (bring your own device) initiatives – Amplify said they believe their prices are competitive.  The Amplify Tablet, which is WiFi-only costs $299 for the device when purchased with a 2-year subscription at $99 per year; and the Tablet Plus, which includes a 4G data plan, costs $349 with a 2-year subscription of $179 per year.

    While that’s a big investment for any school district – and likely too big for many at this point – the devices themselves are cheaper than Apple’s WiFi-only iPad2, for example, which costs schools $399 each. And, Amplify argues, other options don’t include setup and ongoing support services (it has a 24-hour customer service center), admin controls, data integration with Student Information Systems (SISes) and the suite of learning and instructional tools.

    As the company makes its push across the country, Klein himself could play a role in whether districts embrace the technology. While many support his education reform initiatives and efforts to evaluate teachers with student performance data, teacher unions remain critical. And though Amplify doesn’t play up its tablet’s evaluative possibilities and it emphasizes that the schools will own the data, the product will generate more data that could support data-driven teacher evaluation initiatives. It will also be interesting to see how schools respond to a product backed by News Corp., which has spent much of the last year doing damage control in the aftermath of its phone-hacking scandal.

    But growing momentum in the ed tech sector is on its side, as more educators open their classroom doors to new technology but need help figuring out the best solutions. And Amplify executives emphasize that they know they’re just beginning a multi-year journey.

    “There are school systems that are looking to bring mobile devices to schools because they see the power and the potential … and I expect we’ll be able to participate in that,” said Klein.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Social network for education Edmodo buys Root-1 to expand its app market for teachers

    In its first acquisition since launching in 2008, education social network Edmodo has purchased Root-1, a Palo Alto-based maker of education apps. The social education startup said Tuesday that Root-1′s six-person team would join Edmodo’s San Mateo, Calif. office to help it expand the app platform it launched last March.

    In the last year, Edmodo’s platform has grown to support more than 400 apps from third-party developers, it said. The company, which gives teachers and students a secure online hub for communicating and collaborating, also said its user base has more than tripled to 18 million.

    Edmodo did not share details on the deal but said Root-1 co-founder and early Google employee Vibhu Mittal will head up research and development, co-founders Manish Kothari and Ketan Kothari (former co-founders of AlphaSmart) would assume key positions in platform strategy and growth and co-founder Adam Stepinski (who, incidentally, was Mittal’s intern at Google) will join the company’s platform engineering team in a key role.

    With the acquisition, Edmodo not only adds the expertise of Root-1′s team but its five apps, including OpenMinds, which lets teachers and developers customize education apps. That app is particularly interesting as it enables teachers to not just curate apps but play a bigger role in creating digital educational experiences for their students.

    “The key focus is how do we continue to drive a deeper integration of high-quality learning experiences. Teachers are the ones at the center of what their students need to learn and giving them more control and choice is what we strive to do,” said Crystal Hutter, Edmodo’s COO. “[The acquisition] is an extension of our commitment to our platform, our developers and our teachers.”

    The purchase emphasizes Edmodo’s goal of being a distribution channel for classroom content — not only an online communications site for teachers and students — and it highlights Edmodo’s hopes for becoming a growing influence in the maturing ed tech industry. As content goes digital and teachers are more able to pick and choose content from a variety of sources instead of just using a textbook, Edmodo aims to be an underlying platform. Although further monetization plans are no doubt on the horizon, Edmodo supports both free and paid apps and takes a cut of the revenue from publishers.

    The acquisition comes on the heels of a new big hire — last month it brought on board former Mozilla VP Damon Sicore to lead its engineering team and boost the company’s profile in the larger engineering community. To date, the company has raised $47.5 million from investors including New Enterprise Associates, Union Square Ventures and Learn Capital.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.