Author: papundits

  • Ice Won’t Melt

    By Andrew Bolt

    The US National Snow and Ice Data Center in 2007 warns the Arctic ice could vanish:

    The issue is that, for the first time that I am aware of, the North Pole is covered with extensive first-year ice—ice that formed last autumn and winter. I’d say it’s even-odds whether the North Pole melts out [this year].

    The US National Snow and Ice Data Center in 2010 concedes the Arctic ice has grown:

    A report from the US National Snow and Ice Data Center in Colorado finds that Arctic summer sea ice has increased by 409,000 square miles, or 26 per cent, since 2007.

    Andrew Bolt is a journalist and columnist writing for The Herald Sun in Melbourne Victoria Australia.

    Read more excellent articles from Andrew Bolt’s Blog

    Filed under: America (USA), Climate Alarmists, Climate Change, Environment, Environmental activists, Fear-mongering, Global Warming, Liberals, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Pseudo-Journalism Tagged: Andrew Bolt, Arctic Ice, Climate Change Religion, Climate Change Scaremongering, Global Warming Alarmism, Global Warming Hype, Tony

  • Democracy and Capitalism on its Last Legs

    Brief

    The Pied Piper

    The Pied Piper

    The Foundation

    “Human beings will generally exercise power when they can get it, and they will exercise it most undoubtedly in popular governments under pretense of public safety.” –Daniel Webster

    Toward the Nationalization of Health Care

    With Senate and House passage of Barack Hussein Obama’s so-called “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” liberals have now sealed the deal to nationalize the American health care system — almost 17 percent of the U.S. economy. Passage of this measure completes the “triple crown” of the Left’s Socialist agenda: Social Security, Medicare and now health care. One may conclude that nationalized health care, like Social Security and Medicare before it, will soon be bankrupt. (See how your Senator and Representative voted.)

    There is no provision in the United States Constitution giving the central government the authority to nationalize health care, but liberals have never let the Constitution stand in the way of their incremental efforts to socialize the U.S. economy.   …  

    Remarks by the leaders of both House Republicans and Democrats demonstrate that neither Party’s leadership has sufficient regard for First Principles, for Constitutional Rule of Law.

    Most Republicans give it scant lip service, while virtually all Democrats reject Rule of Law outright.

    In his remarks about the legislation, Republican Leader John Boehner did mention the Constitution, but repeated the same worn refrains about what the American people want.

    “Today, this body, this institution, enshrined in the first article of the Constitution by our Founding Fathers as a sign of the importance they placed on this House, should be looking with pride on this legislation and our work. But it is not so. … When we came here, we each swore an oath to uphold and abide by the Constitution as representatives of the people. But the process here is broken. The institution is broken. And as a result, this bill is not what the American people need, nor what our constituents want. … We have failed to listen to America. And we have failed to reflect the will of our constituents.”

    No, Mr. Boehner. You did not take an oath to support and defend the “will of our constituents.”

    In her remarks about the legislation, Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did not, of course, mention the Constitution, but she did offer this adulterated view of First Principles, an outright prevarication: “In [passing this legislation], we will honor the vows of our Founders, who in the Declaration of Independence said that we are ‘endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.’ This legislation will lead to healthier lives, more liberty to pursue hopes and dreams and happiness for the American people.”

    This assertion is an affront to everything our Founders embodied in our national documents of incorporation, and Pelosi, et al., know that.

    Pelosi added, “You will be joining those who established Medicare and Social Security… This is an American proposal that honors the tradition of our country.”

    Nails in the coffin!

    For his part, Obama remarked, “At a time when the pundits said it was no longer possible, we rose above the weight of our politics. We proved that this government, a government of the people and by the people, still works for the people. … This isn’t radical reform, but it is major reform. This is what change looks like. … This represents another stone firmly laid at the foundation of the American Dream.”

    That would be a tombstone, a grave marker for American liberty.

    The Gipper

    “For many years now, you and I have been shushed like children and told there are no simple answers to the complex problems which are beyond our comprehension. Well, the truth is, there are simple answers, they just are not easy ones. The time has come for us to decide whether collectively we can afford everything and anything we think of simply because we think of it. The time has come to run a check to see if all the services government provides were in answer to demands or were just goodies dreamed up for our supposed betterment. The time has come to match outgo to income, instead of always doing it the other way around.” –Ronald Reagan

    Then Now Cartoon

    Political Futures

    “House Democrats last night passed President Obama’s federal takeover of the U.S. health-care system, and the ticker tape media parade is already underway. So this hour of liberal political victory is a good time to adapt the ‘Pottery Barn’ rule that Colin Powell once invoked on Iraq: You break it, you own it. This week’s votes don’t end our health-care debates. By making medical care a subsidiary of Washington, they guarantee such debates will never end. And by ramming the vote through Congress on a narrow partisan majority, and against so much popular opposition, Democrats have taken responsibility for what comes next — to insurance premiums, government spending, doctor shortages and the quality of care. They are now the rulers of American medicine. … While the passage of ObamaCare marks a liberal triumph, its impact will play out over many years. We fought this bill so vigorously because we have studied government health care in other countries, and the results include much higher taxes, slower economic growth and worse medical care. As for the politics, the first verdict arrives in November.” –The Wall Street Journal

    For the Record

    “Never before has the average American been treated to such a live-action view of the sordid politics necessary to push a deeply flawed bill to completion. It was dirty deals, open threats, broken promises and disregard for democracy that pulled ObamaCare to this point, and yesterday the same machinations pushed it across the finish line. … By the weekend, all the pressure and threats and bribes had left the speaker three to five votes short. Her remaining roadblock was those pro-life members who’d boxed themselves in on abortion, saying they would vote against the Senate bill unless it barred public funding of abortion. Mrs. Pelosi’s first instinct was to go around this bloc, getting the votes elsewhere. She couldn’t. Into Saturday night, Michigan’s Bart Stupak and Mrs. Pelosi wrangled over options. The stalemate? Any change that gave Mr. Stupak what he wanted in law would lose votes from pro-choice members. The solution? Remove it from Congress altogether, having the president instead sign a meaningless executive order affirming that no public money should go to pay for abortions. The order won’t change the Senate legal language — as pro-choice Democrats publicly crowed within minutes of the Stupak deal. Executive orders can be changed or eliminated on a whim. Pro-life groups condemned the order as the vote-getting ruse it was. Nevertheless, Mr. Stupak and several of his colleagues voted yes, paving the way to Mrs. Pelosi’s final vote tally of 219.” –columnist Kimberley Strassel

    Liberty

    “[Barack Obama’s] primary goal has always been to gobble up the health care system. The most troubling aspect of the Obamacare debate, however, is not the measure’s sweeping and radical aims — the transformation of one-sixth of the U.S. economy, crippling tax increases, higher premiums, state-sanctioned rationing, longer waiting lines, the erosion of the quality of medical care and the creation of a huge, permanent administrative bureaucracy. Rather, the most alarming aspect is the lengths to which the Democrats are willing to go to achieve their progressive, anti-capitalist agenda. Obamacare is opposed by nearly two-thirds of the public, more than 60 percent of independents and almost all Republicans and conservatives. It has badly fractured the country, dangerously polarizing it along ideological and racial lines. Even a majority of Democrats in the House are deeply reluctant to support it. Numerous states — from Idaho to Virginia to Texas — have said they will sue the federal government should Obamacare become law. They will declare themselves exempt from its provisions, tying up the legislation in the courts for years to come. … Obama is willing to devour his presidency, his party’s congressional majority and – most disturbing – our democratic institutional safeguards to enact it. He is a reckless ideologue who is willing to sacrifice the country’s stability in pursuit of a socialist utopia.” –columnist Jeffrey Kuhner

    Re: The Left

    “Democrats consider election losses a small price to pay for health care ‘reform.’ Predictions range from moderate fall election losses to a bloodbath resulting in a Republican takeover of the House and possibly even the Senate. To this Democrats say, ‘So what?’ Once health care reform becomes law, that’s that. Only a Republican charge with a filibuster-proof Republican supermajority in the Senate could undo it. Besides, President Bill Clinton got re-elected when the Republicans took over the House. … Some people refuse to see what’s best. That’s why God created Democrats. Democrats ultimately want a Canadian-style single-payer system. ObamaCare will result in cost overruns, caregivers driven out of business, declining quality, rationing, reduced innovation and bureaucrats determining who gets what, how and when. What then? When the complaints grow loud enough, Democrats will be ready — with a plan to ‘reform’ the ‘reform.’” –columnist Larry Elder

    Reader Comments

    “The Constitution requires that Members of Congress take an oath ‘to support this Constitution.’ The oath is not specified in detail, but the oath currently used says the member will ’support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign or domestic.’ The President’s oath is specified in the Constitution. He must swear to ‘preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.’ In my view, the President’s oath is more sweeping. He has the highest obligation in the land to defend the Constitution and our Liberty. Our current President seems intent on destroying, not preserving, the Constitution, and as quickly as possible.” –Robert

    “Health is not a right. It is a personal responsibility. Health care is not a right. It is a commodity. Health insurance is not a right. It is a financial risk management tool. Those who try to equate the Constitutional right of ‘life’ with health, heath care, health insurance have got it completely wrong. The Constitution does not guarantee that the federal government will provide you with life. Instead it guarantees that the federal government will not take life away from you. Unless the government has done something to your health that resulted in the loss of your life, then you have no claim against the government, or a right to its monies (which come from taxes). If you fail to take personal responsibility for your health (proper diet, exercise, life style, etc.), that ain’t the government’s fault. Its your fault and you should bear the burden. If, for some bizarre reason, you can find a Constitutional requirement for providing health insurance to every citizen of this nation, then haven’t we been violating the Constitution for nearly the first 130+ years of it’s existence?” –Mike

    The Last Word

    “Liberals keep complaining that Republicans don’t have a plan for reforming health care in America. I have a plan! It’s a one-page bill creating a free market in health insurance. Let’s all pause here for a moment so liberals can Google the term ‘free market.’ Nearly every problem with health care in this country — apart from trial lawyers and out-of-date magazines in doctors’ waiting rooms — would be solved by my plan. In the first sentence, Congress will amend the McCarran-Ferguson Act to allow interstate competition in health insurance. We can’t have a free market in health insurance until Congress eliminates the antitrust exemption protecting health insurance companies from competition. … The very next sentence of my bill provides that the exclusive regulator of insurance companies will be the state where the company’s home office is. Every insurance company in the country would incorporate in the state with the fewest government mandates…. The third sentence of my bill would prohibit the federal government from regulating insurance companies, except for normal laws and regulations that apply to all companies. Freed from onerous state and federal mandates turning insurance companies into public utilities, insurers would be allowed to offer a whole smorgasbord of insurance plans, finally giving consumers a choice. Instead of Harry Reid deciding whether your insurance plan covers Viagra, this decision would be made by you, the consumer. (I apologize for using the terms ‘Harry Reid’ and ‘Viagra’ in the same sentence. I promise that won’t happen again.) Instead of insurance companies jumping to the tune of politicians bought by health-care lobbyists, they would jump to tune of hundreds of millions of Americans buying health insurance on the free market. Hypochondriac liberals could still buy the aromatherapy plan and normal people would be able to buy plans that only cover things such as major illness, accidents and disease. … This would, in effect, transform medical insurance into … a form of insurance! My bill will solve nearly every problem allegedly addressed by ObamaCare — and mine entails zero cost to the taxpayer. Indeed, a free market in health insurance would produce major tax savings as layers of government bureaucrats, unnecessary to medical service in America, get fired. … In addition to saving taxpayer money and providing better health insurance, my plan also saves trees by being 2,199 pages shorter than the Democrats’ plan. Feel free to steal it, Republicans!” –columnist Ann Coulter

    Read more informative articles at

    Filed under: 111th Congress, 2008 Elections, Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama), Conniving Politicians, Constitution, Demo-gogues, Democracy, Democrats, Freedom, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Legislative Branch, Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Marxists, News and Views, Political Prostitutes, Politicians for the Destruction of America, US Government Tagged: Annie, The Patriot Post

  • Barack Wins, America Pays

    By Andrew Bolt

    TonyfromOz prefaces …..

    This decision is big news even in far off Australia, where, with a left leaning MSM, and also a Government from the left side of politics, it is being hailed as ….. wonderful news. Some commentators however do not view it in that manner, and Andrew is pretty much a lone voice on that front. This is most definitely not wonderful news at all.

    A win for Barack Obama for which the Democrats may soon pay the price:

    Summoned to success by President Barack Obama, the Democratic-controlled Congress approved historic legislation Sunday night extending health care to tens of millions of uninsured Americans and cracking down on insurance company abuses, a climactic chapter in the century-long quest for near universal coverage…

    Widely viewed as dead two months ago, the Senate-passed bill cleared the House on a 219-212 vote. Republicans were unanimous in opposition, joined by 34 dissident Democrats.   …   

    Obama’s young presidency received a badly needed boost as a deeply divided Congress passed legislation touching the lives of nearly every American. The battle for the future of the health insurance system — affecting one-sixth of the economy — galvanized Republicans and conservative activists looking ahead to November’s midterm elections…

    The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the legislation awaiting the president’s approval would extend coverage to 32 million Americans who lack it, ban insurers from denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions and cut deficits by an estimated $138 billion over a decade. If realized, the expansion of coverage would include 95 percent of all eligible individuals under age 65.

    For the first time, most Americans would be required to purchase insurance, and face penalties if they refused. Much of the money in the bill would be devoted to subsidies to help families at incomes of up to $88,000 a year pay their premiums.

    Washington Examiner:

    Despite more than a year of steadily rising public opposition, manifested in opinion polls and in protest rallies across the country, President Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi finally rammed through Obamacare late Sunday when House Democrats gave the bill their imprimatur.

    The House vote isn’t the end of the national debate on this issue, however, as the Senate still must accept the House changes in the Senate Obamacare bill. Senate Republicans argue that the House reconciliation bill that makes significant changes in the Senate bill violates the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, maintaining that it should be ruled out of order by the Senate parliamentarian for consideration in the upper chamber. That in turn would mean the only bill the president could legally sign would be the original Senate bill, with its massive funding of abortion and the infamous deals used to buy senators’ votes, including the Cornhusker Kickback. At that point, a constitutional crisis of historic magnitude seems inevitable.

    Here’s why: Never before in American history has a measure of such importance been imposed on the country by the majority party over the unanimous opposition of the minority.

    John Hinderaker is still optimistic:

    * The health care bill’s taxes will go into effect promptly, but its substantive provisions are, for the most part, deferred for four years. This means that we have plenty of time to repeal the legislation… Moreover, even if the Republicans only take over the House in November, and not the Senate, won’t it be possible to throw roadblocks in the way of the bill’s implementation? Won’t budget appropriations be necessary to sustain the various federal tentacles the bill seeks to establish? What will happen if the House simply refuses to fund them?…

    * The health care debate has energized the conservative movement and awoken the sleeping giant, that is, the American people….

    * Barack Obama has used his political capital–pretty much all of it–on unpopular legislation that will continue to rile the voters for years to come. As a result, Obama is a remarkably unpopular second-year President….

    Mark Steyn isn’t so sunny:

    You can say, oh, well, the polls show most people opposed to it, but, if that mattered, the Dems wouldn’t be doing what they’re doing. Their bet is that it can’t be undone, and that over time, as I’ve been saying for years now, governmentalized health care not only changes the relationship of the citizen to the state but the very character of the people…

    More prosaically, it’s also unaffordable.. Five years from now, just as in Canada and Europe two generations ago, we’ll be getting used to announcements of defense cuts to prop up the unsustainable costs of big government at home. And, as the superpower retrenches, America’s enemies will be quick to scent opportunity.

    Longer wait times, fewer doctors, more bureaucracy, massive IRS expansion, explosive debt, the end of the Pax Americana, and global Armageddon. Must try to look on the bright side . . .

    At least Obama finally achieved bipartisanship:

    These are the (34) Democrats who voted no tonight on the Senate-passed health-care bill….

    Andrew Bolt is a journalist and columnist writing for The Herald Sun in Melbourne Victoria Australia.

    Read more excellent articles from Andrew Bolt’s Blog

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama), Blundering Bureaucrats, Conniving Politicians, Demo-gogues, Democracy, Democrats, economy, Liberals, Medicine, Political Prostitutes, Politicians for the Destruction of America, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Public Opinion, Spine Donor Politicians Tagged: Andrew Bolt, Democrat Congress Control, Health Care Reform Bill, Obamacare, ObamaCare Catastrophe, President Obama, Tony

  • The American Icarus

    By Alan Caruba

    There are certain laws of nature that no one can amend or avoid. In the classic Greek tale of Icarus, despite warnings Icarus flew too close to the sun, melted the wax that held the feathers that had given him the gift of flight, and falls to his death. The law of gravity contributed to his end because what goes up must come down.

    These days I think of the nation in general and the Democrats in Congress in particular as Icarus. They have ignored all the warnings about Obamacare and now have the political trajectory of a rock tossed too high in the air.

    The voters reaction to the excesses of the Bush administration—-which now seem minor in comparison to those of the Democrats—-catapulted a virtually unknown and literally unvetted, minor first-term senator from Illinois into the Oval Office. The voters had first expressed their unhappiness in 2006 when control of Congress passed from the Republicans.

    It seems to me that Americans have been unhappy for a very long time, but I can recall few decades when they were happy. With World War Two behind them, Americans launched themselves into the 1950s with enthusiasm, getting married, having babies, and building an economy that was unrivaled. America became the lone superpower.   …  

    By the 1960s, though, things began to sour. A generation of young people began to question all the values that had served their parents and grandparents well. The civil rights movement emerged and by the end of the decade the nation was mired in a war in Vietnam most people did not support. It would result in the death of more than 50,000 of our youth. A drug culture began to take root.

    The signal political change during the 1960s was the implementation of Medicare in 1965, a significant expansion of Social Security. It quickly exceeded its projected costs.

    By the 1970s, despite the inspiration of having begun to explore space, putting men on the Moon in 1969, and an abundance of material goods, America’s mood was growing dark. Between 1972 and 1974, the Watergate scandal dragged on until the first and only resignation of a president ended it.

    In 1973 abortion was legalized. The feminist movement gained momentum. As the decade ended in 1979 Iranians seized U.S. diplomats, holding them hostage for 444 days.

    The 1980s were, for conservatives, a golden age led by Ronald Reagan. The economy improved and, in general, so did the mood of the nation. It was also a time in which Islam began to reassert itself with a series of terrorist acts. Democrats in Congress continued to be in control.

    At the end of Reagan’s term, George H.W. Bush, his vice president, was elected in 1988, but despite a military campaign to contain Saddam Hussein, the voters opted for a young Arkansas Governor named Bill Clinton.

    What came to be seen as a series of excesses by liberal Democrats led to the defeat of the Clinton Medicare expansion effort and, in 1994, Congressional power was transferred to the Republican Party for the first time in some 40 years!

    Clinton, despite being reelected, proved to be a major embarrassment to the nation as the result of his sexual appetites. Popular to the end with most Democrats, he would be replaced by George W. Bush as the new century began in 2000.

    If the mood of the nation was one of cautious optimism, that changed dramatically on September 11, 2001. Fear swept the nation and a desire to punish the stateless terror inflicted led also to a decision by Bush to alter the direction of the Middle East by removing Saddam Hussein from power. Despite a brilliant initial dash to Baghdad the Iraq war was plagued with a cascade of bad decisions.

    A sudden financial crisis toward the end of the 2008 political campaign returned a Democrat to the White House. It has taken just over a year for Barack Hussein Obama to see his performance ratings plummet from around 70 percent to around 40 percent these days. He is rivaling the worse ratings for any president since such polls began.

    The bruising battle over the expansion of Medicare at a time of high unemployment and the imposition of high levels of national debt will likely push the President’s ratings even lower before the year is out.

    What has been discussed here is not a rising curve of optimism for the future of the nation, but a declining one made worse and seriously endangered by irrational borrowing and spending.

    Like Icarus, the nation has flown too close to its source of life, weakened its economic foundations, gave itself over to the greatest hoax of the modern era, global warming, and now has witnessed a Democrat controlled Congress do what most voters opposed.

    America has weathered previous crisis, but there is a growing sense that its future is in the hands of people who do not like America, do not like its slow, methodical way of debating and reflecting the will of the people, and who threaten liberties its citizens have taken for granted.

    Weighed down by growing debt, threatened by expanded “entitlement” programs that promise to grow that debt while subjecting Americans to higher taxation, the mood of the nation has rarely been at such a critical and dour point.

    Gravity is about to have its way with the nation.

    © Alan Caruba, 2010

    Alan Caruba writes a daily post at Warning Signs. A business and science writer, he is the founder of The National Anxiety Center.

    Read more thought provoking articles at Warning Signs

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama), Blundering Bureaucrats, Conniving Politicians, Demo-gogues, Democracy, Democrats, economy, Liberals, Political Prostitutes, Politicians for the Destruction of America, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Public Opinion, Spine Donor Politicians Tagged: Alan Caruba, Democrat Congress Control, Health Care Reform Bill, Liberal Democrats, Obama Popularity, Obamacare, ObamaCare Catastrophe, Tony, Warning Signs

  • Weekend At Bennie’s

    Satire by  Shawn Goodwin

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced a plan to build settlements in East Jerusalem this week, setting off a firestorm of criticism and scorn from Israel’s enemies. Interestingly, the most severe criticism came from the United States and members of the Obama administration. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton “sharply criticized” the decision to build new settlements in the area, and Vice-President Slow Joe Biden “condemned” the Israeli plan.

    For those of you keeping score at home, members of the Obama administration refused to condemn Iran when it violently put down opposition after the recent elections. They refused to condemn last year’s Honduran coup and they refused to condemn Abba’s induction into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Really?  Abba? They refuse to condemn any one of these despicable actions, but they will condemn the Israeli’s decision to build homes on its own soil?

    Citizens of both countries were taken aback by the administration’s criticism. Israel is a strong American ally and a beacon of freedom in a highly oppressive area. If Biden and Clinton’s language was intended to scare Netanyahu straight, they failed faster than a Matt Damon film:   …  

    A defiant Mr. Netanyahu appeared to be digging in despite clear indications that the Obama administration is now demanding the scrapping of plans for 1,600 new Jewish homes, whose announcement overshadowed last week’s visit to Israel by the US Vice-President Joe Biden. Mr. Netanyahu’s stance appeared to guarantee, after a highly charged week, the protraction of a stand-off in which a full-scale diplomatic row blew up at the start of Mr. Biden’s visit and appeared to abate at the end of it. But it was then reignited by demands from Hillary Clinton and an angry White House that Israel make amends for the “insulting” announcement just as indirect negotiations with the Palestinians had finally been arranged.

    Insulting? No, having to sit on your hands and watch the peaceful, law-abiding, unicorn-loving Palestinians fire rockets into your neighborhood is insulting. Having to listen to a screeching Hillary Clinton lecture your country on restraint is insulting. Having to be verbally dressed down by Joe Biden, a man who believes the Washington Monument is named after Denzel is insulting.

    Sadly, the insults continued:

    The US is now said to be demanding substantive concessions from Israel after a warning by the Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas that he would not take part in talks if the plan to expand the mainly ultra-orthodox Ramat Shlomo settlement went ahead. The row has appeared finally to bring to a head the year-long tensions between the two governments since Barack Obama tried in vain to persuade the Israeli Prime Minister to agree to a total settlement freeze. He was thwarted by Mr. Netanyahu who agreed only to a partial 10-month freeze, which did not include East Jerusalem.

    By all means, have the administration demand concessions from Israel now. That would be akin to something like this: American Idol judge Simon Cowell berates a female contestant to the point of tears. The girl runs out of the room, only to be brought back for more verbal abuse. After running out again, a producer tracks her down and tells her that Cowell strained his vocal chords while shouting, and the girl owes him $50 for the medical bill! The Palestinians have violated every cease fire, peace accord, and gentleman’s agreement thus far, but the Obama administration believes that they are the victims. Strangely enough, they also think that the Earth-annihilating aliens from Independence Day – a film Dennis Kucinich believes is based on actual events – were simply “misunderstood.” They were not, and neither are the Palestinians. Like the Iranian government, their ultimate goal is to see Israel wiped off the map.

    Prime Minister Netanyahu’s duty is to see that this never happens. He needs to prepare his country for every contingency, so if the unthinkable occurs, they will be ready. Security checkpoints must be fortified, strategic battle plans must be drawn, and emergency shelters should be stocked with fresh water, food rations, and Zach Braff films  If worse comes to worse, the country is ready to draft Sports Illustrated swimsuit supermodel Bar Refaeli into IDF service, although one has to wonder how she will carry a machine gun and extra ammo magazines while wearing a thong. Either way, Israel will survive. They always do. They are a resilient people with tremendous national pride.  If the time comes, they will be ready to fight.

    During his presidential campaign, Barack Obama said that his administration would strengthen existing partnerships and improve America’s standing in the world. In the past 14 months, the administration has done little in that vein, especially when it comes to Israel. Waning support, blatant snubs, and harsh criticism has been the norm rather the exception from this administration, and people are starting to notice.

    Israel deserves better.

    FamilySecurityMatters.org’s official satirist, Shawn Goodwin, is a blogger and police detective from Philly.

    Read more excellent articles from

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama), Conniving Politicians, Democracy, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Humor, Israel, Jerusalem, Liberals, Middle East, Palestinian, Political Prostitutes, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Public Opinion, Satire, Spine Donor Politicians, Vice President Joe Biden Tagged: FSM (Shawn Goodwin), Israel Prime Minister Benjamin (Bibi) Netanyahu, Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Obama Foreign Policy, Obama Israel Policy, Political Satire, President Obama, Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton, Tony, Vice President Joe Biden

  • Talk Of Impeachment

    By Alan Caruba

    Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
    – C. S. Lewis (1898 – 1963)

    Jeffrey T. Kuhner, president of the Edmund Burke Institute, a Washington, D.C. think tank, and a columnist at The Washington Times, might as well have rolled a grenade down the main aisle of the House of Representatives chamber. On March 19 he wrote a column titled, “Impeach the President?”

    It is a bold proposal and would end much of the agony that President Obama has inflicted on Americans. In lesser developed nations a leader as unpopular as Obama would risk being seized by a mob and dragged through the streets before being hung.

    Of course, we don’t do that kind of thing and, truth be told, impeachment proceedings have been rare in American history and both have failed.   …  
    Only two presidents have faced impeachment. One was Andrew Johnson who became president upon the assassination of Lincoln. Taking power in the wake of the Civil War, he was deemed to be too friendly to the defeated South. His removal from office in 1868 was defeated by a single vote.

    The other president to be impeached was Bill Clinton in 1998. The charges brought against him included perjury, obstruction of justice, and malfeasance in office. He was no doubt guilty of all three, but the proceeding was initiated primarily as the result of the Monica Lewinsky scandal and a lawsuit brought by Paula Jones.

    It was the considered judgment of the Senate that his failure to keep his penis in his pants did not rise to the punishment of losing his job. In hindsight, the senators might have been mindful that they would be installing Al Gore, the vice president, if they removed Clinton.

    I cite this to demonstrate that impeaching Barack Obama—while probably the right thing to do—would be an impossibility in a Senate and House controlled by Democrats.

    Not to go all legal on you, but Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution says, “The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and, Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

    Constitutional lawyers deem “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” as acts of criminality in which a law was broken; abuses of power; and something called a “violation of public trust” as defined by Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers. The definition of this is, for all intents and purposes, whatever the House of Representatives say it is. These are, after all, folks who can’t even kick Charlie Rangel out on his kiester.

    The two acts of impeachment issued in the past cited exceeding the constitutional bounds of the powers of the office of president; behavior that is considered grossly incompatible with the function and purpose of the office; and using the power of the office for an improper purpose or for personal gain.

    Being fellated in the Oval Office by a White House intern did not turn out to be sufficiently grossly incompatible in 1998. Clinton finished his second term, pardoned a lot of felons, and probably had to be restrained from leaving with the White House silver and chinaware.

    Kuhner, however, made a very strong case for impeaching Obama. He accused the president of “imposing a leftist revolution” with the de facto nationalization of “key sectors of American life—the big banks, financial institutions, the automakers, large tracts of energy-rich land from Montana to New Mexico” were cited as examples.

    The ugliness concerning the healthcare “reform” legislation and the proposed Cap-and-Trade legislation was cited as Obama’s willingness “to devour his presidency, his party’s congressional majority and—most disturbing—our democratic institutional safeguards to enact” both pieces of legislation.

    “He is a reckless ideologue who is willing to sacrifice the country’s stability in pursuit of a socialist utopia.”

    That is, in fact, what both Stalin did in Russia and Mao did in China. Both inflicted death in the millions and economic ruin on both societies.

    The question, however, is whether the process of impeachment can be initiated and, once commenced, whether a case could be made to depose Obama. That is not likely to happen. It has nothing to do with whether a just case can be made, but because of the vast corruption of the political process and the moral decay Americans are witnessing in the Democrat Party.

    We are now living in a state of constant crisis in America. That is precisely the way the White House likes it. Such conditions could lead to a complete seizure of power in the name of protecting the Republic.

    It worked in Nazi Germany in the last century. It worked in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. It worked in Cuba. And it is at work today in Venezuela.

    Despotism never sleeps.

    © Alan Caruba, 2010

    Alan Caruba writes a daily post at Warning Signs. A business and science writer, he is the founder of The National Anxiety Center.

    Read more thought provoking articles at Warning Signs

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama), Conniving Politicians, Democracy, Democrats, Liberals, Political Prostitutes, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Public Opinion, Spine Donor Politicians Tagged: Alan Caruba, Democrat Congress Control, President Obama, Socialism, Tony, Warning Signs

  • How Obama May Have Triggered A New Intifada

    By Andrew Bolt

    Yossi Klein Halevi outlines just how far Barack Obama went out of his way this month to demonise Israel, and put it in yet more danger:

    Suddenly, my city feels again like a war zone… (N)ow, again, there are clusters of helmeted border police near the gates of the Old City, black smoke from burning tires in the Arab village across from my porch, young men marching with green Islamist flags toward my neighbourhood, ambulances parked at strategic places ready for this city’s ultimate nightmare.

    The return of menace to Jerusalem is not because a mid-level bureaucrat announced stage four of a seven-stage process in the eventual construction of 1,600 apartments in Ramat Shlomo, a Jewish neighbourhood in northeast Jerusalem… Ramat Shlomo, located between the Jewish neighbourhoods of French Hill and Ramot, will remain within the boundaries of Israeli Jerusalem according to every peace plan…

    The answer lies not in Jerusalem but in Washington.   …   By placing the issue of building in Jewish neighbourhoods in East Jerusalem at the centre of the peace process, President Obama has inadvertently challenged the Palestinians to do no less….

    Though Obama’s insistence on a settlement freeze to help restart negotiations was legitimate, he went a step too far by including building in East Jerusalem. Every Israeli government over the last four decades has built in the Jewish neighbourhoods of East Jerusalem; no government, let alone one headed by the Likud, could possibly agree to a freeze there. Obama made resumption of negotiations hostage to a demand that could not be met. The result was that Palestinian leaders were forced to adjust their demands accordingly….

    In turning an incident into a crisis, Obama has convinced many Israelis that he was merely seeking a pretext to pick a fight with Israel… The popular assumption is that Obama is seeking to prove his resolve as a leader by getting tough with Israel. Given his ineffectiveness against Iran and his tendency to violate his own self-imposed deadlines for sanctions, the Israeli public is not likely to be impressed. Indeed, …according to an Israel Radio poll on March 16, 62% of Israelis blame the Obama administration for the crisis, while 20% blame Netanyahu….

    Obama’s one-sided public pressure against Israel could intensify the atmosphere of “open season” against Israel internationally… To the fictitious notion of a peace process, Obama has now added the fiction of an intransigent Israel blocking the peace process.

    His recklessness is endangering Israeli — and Palestinian — lives. As I listen to police sirens outside my window, Obama’s political intifada against Netanyahu seems to be turning into a third intifada over Jerusalem.

    Andrew Bolt is a journalist and columnist writing for The Herald Sun in Melbourne Victoria Australia.

    Read more excellent articles from Andrew Bolt’s Blog

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama), Conniving Politicians, Democracy, Democrats, Israel, Jerusalem, Liberals, Middle East, Palestinian, Political Prostitutes, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Public Opinion, Spine Donor Politicians Tagged: Andrew Bolt, East Jerusalem, Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Obama Foreign Policy, Obama Israel Policy, Tony

  • It’s Not Easy Being Muslim

    By Alan CarubaBehead Infidels

    As this is written, we’re just over a week or so away from Palm Sunday, Passover, and Easter in April. I am no expert, but I have found nothing in either the Jewish or Christian Testaments that require Christians or Jews to make war on other religions to convert them. Proselytizing is encouraged, but not with a threat of death.

    Islam is not a religion of peace. It never was.

    Despite being pre-dated centuries by both Judaism and Christianity (as well as Buddhism and Hindu), from its beginning in the seventh century C.E., Islam made it very clear that it intended to be the only game in town. In predominantly Muslim nations today, practicing any other faith can often get you killed. The decision to leave Islam can also get you killed.

    While Islam has had brief periods of tolerance, in the past when Muslims showed up people soon learned that could either convert or be subjected to a very unpleasant social status (Dhimmi) and taxed for their failure to embrace Islam. Wherever Muslims gain in population, they always act to demand that elements of Sharia law be obeyed by non-Muslims. There is no separation of church and state in Islam.

    They are easily offended. It can get you killed.

    Islam translates as “submission” and even a cursory reading of the Koran reveals a very harsh view of what is moral and what is not. Multiple wives are moral. Concubines are moral. Slavery is moral. Honor killings are moral. It’s a long, unpleasant list.

    Converts from Islam continually say they feel like that they have been freed from an insane asylum. You would, too, if you were constantly harangued in the mosque to wage war against everyone who is not a Muslim.

    There are more than a billion Muslims in the world, but we tend to think only of Arabs when we think of Islam. It is widespread in Africa and has resulted in rioting and death in many African nations. In the Philippines, the killing of Christians is widespread.

    It’s a cliché that not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims. Not quite true, but close enough these days. An American convert to Islam calling herself Jihad Jane pled innocent this week to charges of planning to kill a Swedish cartoonist.

    I got to thinking about this on news that an American-born Muslim cleric, Anwar al-Awlaki, currently residing in Sana’a Yemen is in the news calling for a jihad against the United States.

    “With the American invasion of Iraq and continued U.S. aggression against Muslims,” said al-Awlaki, “I could not reconcile between living in the U.S. and being a Muslim, and I eventually came to the conclusion that jihad against America is binding on myself just as it is binding on every other Muslim.”

    Al-Awlaki is afflicted with a very selective memory as is frequently the case with his version of being a good Muslim. He seems to have forgotten all the bombings, kidnappings, and killings of Americans from around the 1980s onwards until, of course, 9/11 in which a group of Muslims killed nearly 3,000 Americans in attacks on the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a flight that was diverted from a target in the nation’s capital.

    He seems to not recall that Iraq’s dictator for thirty years, Saddam Hussein, waged war against the very Muslim nation of Iran for eight years to a stalemate and then invaded Kuwait, he gassed Kurds to death in his own nation. You could find yourself fed live into a wood chopper in his glory days. If ever a dictator needed removal, Saddam was the poster boy.

    In more recent days, Awlaki had been in communication with U.S. Army Major Nidal Hasan who thought it was a really good idea to yell “Allah akbar” while murdering thirteen unarmed soldiers at Fort Hood.

    To Muslims in America, al-Awlaki said, “How can your conscience allow you to live in peaceful coexistence with a nation that is responsible for the tyranny and crimes committed against your own brothers and sisters?” In short, he is saying that an American Muslim’s first and only allegiance is to Islam, not the United States.

    He’s wrong. Muslims have lived and thrived and served America with honor. Their problem, however, is a religion that directly threatens America and all other non-Muslim nations; a religion lacking tolerance, lacking mercy, and lacking the very conscience that permits al-Awlaki to urge treason.

    It’s not going to be easy to be a Muslim in America for a very long time to come. Loyal Muslim Americans have an obligation to identify those who are not.

    © Alan Caruba, 2010

    Alan Caruba writes a daily post at Warning Signs. A business and science writer, he is the founder of The National Anxiety Center.

    Read more thought provoking articles at Warning Signs

    Filed under: America (USA), Fanatics, Fear-mongering, Islam, Islamic Terrorists, Muslim Terrorists, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Public Opinion, Religious Persecution, Sharia (Shari’a) Tagged: Alan Caruba, Islam, Islamic Radicalism, Muslim Americans, Muslim Extremism, Radical Muslim Terrorism, sharia law, Tony, Warning Signs

  • The Response

    According to the Australian:

    Benjamin Netanyahu and aides in desperate effort to appease US ISRAEL’S inner cabinet is trying to formulate a response that will satisfy the Obama administration as a way to restart the Middle East peace process.

    “Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has held marathon meetings with the six most powerful ministers to come up with a course of action that will satisfy the US, particularly Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

    In a 43-minute phone call this week between Mrs Clinton and Mr Netanyahu, a fiery Secretary of State demanded that Israel reply to questions following the visit to Israel of US Vice-President Joe Biden.” -more

    Read More by

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Cartoons, Conniving Politicians, Democrats, Hillary Clinton, Humor, Israel, Israeli, Liberals, Middle East, Political Prostitutes, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Public Opinion, Satire, Spine Donor Politicians, Vice President Joe Biden Tagged: Dry Bones, Israeli Prime Minister Bejamin Netanyahu, Political Cartoons, Political Humor, Political Satire, Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton, Tony, U.S. Foreign Policy, Vice President Joe Biden

  • Violating Our Constitution, Shredding Our Rights + More

    Constitution in the Shredder Digest

    The Foundation

    “[G]iving [Congress] a distinct and independent power to do any act they please which may be good for the Union, would render all the preceding and subsequent enumerations of power completely useless. It would reduce the whole [Constitution] to a single phrase, that of instituting a Congress with power to do whatever would be for the good of the United States; and as sole judges of the good or evil, it would be also a power to do whatever evil they please. Certainly, no such universal power was meant to be given them.” –Thomas Jefferson

    Government & Politics

    Constitution in the Shredder

    “We are absolutely giddy over the great news that we’ve gotten,” House Democratic Whip James Clyburn (D-SC) declared Thursday. No wonder. The Congressional Budget Office provided a predictable boost to Democrats this week with its “preliminary” estimate that the updated health care takeover bill   …    (text here) would cost $940 billion over the next 10 years — all without adding to the deficit.

    If you believe that, we have some oceanfront property in Arizona for sale.

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) cooed, “I love numbers. They’re so precise.” That is, if by “precise” she means bogus. The CBO is required to take legislation as it’s written (or, more precisely in this case, how it’s described), not necessarily as it will be enacted. The deficit-neutral finding is based on the Demo claim that increased taxes and shuffling Medicare and Medicaid expenses will “save” money. Cutting these entitlements, however, is easier said than done. Additionally, implementation is delayed, meaning there will be hardly any spending for the first few years under the bill. On top of that, a provision was recently added to the bill that ends student loan subsidies to lenders — which conveniently accounts for nearly all of the $19.8 billion in deficit “reduction” that Democrats are touting.

    As we have pointed out numerous times before, however, the money business is almost entirely beside the point. House leaders are trying to foist upon us an unconstitutional nationalization of the health care industry using a cowardly and unconstitutional method, namely, the “Slaughter Rule.”

    Because of the election of Scott Brown to the open Senate seat in Massachusetts, Democrats were forced to abandon their machinations in the upper chamber, though not before threatening to use “reconciliation” to jam the bill through on a simple majority vote. Now, the House is planning to “deem” the Senate bill passed, rather than vote on it, in a process known as a “self-executing rule.” As Mark Alexander observed, “‘Slaughter’ and ’self-executing’ may describe both the process and the electoral future of many Democrats in the House.”

    Columnist Tony Blankley explains, “[U]nder the proposed scheme, the Senate bill would be ‘deemed’ to have passed the House and become law without a presidential signature. Then the Senate would pass the House-demanded amendments, and the House members would then cast only one vote — for the amendments they like, rather than the underlying Senate bill they hate. Thus (so Pelosi’s theory holds) politically protecting House members, who could say they never actually voted for the publicly despised Senate bill.” Profiles in courage, no?

    Republicans attempted to force an actual vote on the bill, but Democrats defeated that resolution Thursday 222-203. A “vote” — likely via the Slaughter Rule — on the Senate bill is tentatively scheduled for Sunday. (Here’s a list of Democrats who might need a little encouragement.)

    Democrats don’t care, but Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution is pretty clear: “[T]he Votes of both Houses shall be determined by yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively.” If the bill passes the House via the Demos’ trickery, no single bill will have passed both houses. Thus, we have a bill that is disliked by a strong majority of Americans, enjoys strong bipartisan opposition in Congress, and is being rammed into law via unconstitutional means. There’s a word for legislation like this: illegitimate.

    Barack Obama, a narcissist if ever there was one, has made clear that his presidency hinges on the passage of ObamaCare. Turning up the pressure, Obama met with “undecided” Democrats this week, no doubt to make them offers they can’t refuse. After the meeting, Rep. Jose Serrano (D-NY) said, “We went in there already knowing his presidency would be weakened if this thing went down, but the president clearly reinforced the impression the presidency would be damaged by a loss. He was subtle, but that was the underlying theme of the meeting — the importance of passing this for the health of the presidency.” It should go without saying that Obama’s ego is not sufficient reason for trampling the Constitution while wrecking the American health system. But, then again, who says elected Democrats are principled?

    Slaughter of Congressional Rules

    This Week’s ‘Alpha Jackass’ Award

    “I don’t spend a lot of time worrying about what the procedural rules are in the House or Senate. What I can tell you is that the vote that’s taken in the House will be a vote for health care reform. And if people vote yes, whatever form that takes, that is going to be a vote for health care reform. And I don’t think we should pretend otherwise. And if they don’t, if they vote against it, then they’re going to be voting against health care reform, and they’re going to be voting in favor of the status quo. So Washington gets very concerned with these procedures in Congress, whether Republicans are in charge or Democrats are in charge. … By the time the vote has taken place, not only I will know what’s in it, you’ll know what’s in it because it’s going to be posted and everybody’s going to be able to evaluate it on the merits.” –Barack Obama

    Translation: The Constitution be damned.

    On Cross-Examination

    “Politically speaking, [the Slaughter Rule] is beyond sleazy. It’s meant to protect House Democrats, who are all running for re-election in November, from having to make a tough vote up or down on health care reform. Pelosi says of this process, quote, ‘I like it, because people don’t have to vote on the Senate bill,’ unquote. In Nancy Pelosi’s world, accountability is a dirty word. … This tactic has been used in the past, but never — never — for something as big and important as the $900 billion health care reform bill — never. Republicans are jumping all over this, rightfully so. They’re painting it as a way for Democrats to avoid taking responsibility, which is exactly what it is. Some even suggest it’s unconstitutional. Meanwhile, President Obama’s campaigning relentlessly, calling on lawmakers to pass health care reform, quote, ‘I want some courage. I want us to do the right thing,’ unquote. Well, the irony here is if Nancy Pelosi gets her way, it won’t take much courage at all on the part of our so-called representatives, will it?” –CNN commentator Jack Cafferty, who is by no means a conservative

    If John Hancock were in Congress 2010

    The BIG Truth

    “You know we’re going to control the insurance companies.” –Joe Biden, with his two cents

    News From the Swamp: Debt Panel Takes Shape

    Barack Obama’s bipartisan panel on the national debt is slowly taking shape with the addition of six congressional Republicans this week. Joining from the Senate are Judd Gregg (NH), Mike Crapo (ID) and Tom Coburn (OK); from the House are Dave Camp (MI), Paul Ryan (WI) and Jeb Hensarling (TX). All six have pledged to push for spending cuts instead of tax increases to reduce the government’s obscenely large debt. The commission’s final recommendations will not be binding, however, and the White House has insisted that the panel complete its work after the midterm elections rather than before. This way Democrats can have political cover when they recommend tax hikes over spending cuts in order to bring the government’s finances in order.

    Higher taxes alone won’t save the budget, though. The entitlements that have grown too large to manage will have to be trimmed if America is going to keep its AAA bond rating. Moody’s Investors Service suggested this week that the U.S. is in danger of losing its top credit status if it doesn’t soon control its debt-to-revenue ratio. A lowered credit rating will harm the government’s ability to obtain favorable loans, thus leading to massively increased interest rates and taxes. The U.S. has maintained its AAA credit rating ever since Moody’s first started rating the country in 1949, though the national debt currently measures 64 percent of GDP.

    New & Notable Legislation

    The Senate passed a $17.6 billion “jobs” bill Wednesday, the first in a series of such bills, and Barack Obama signed it on Thursday. The legislation includes highway funding as well as a payroll tax break for small businesses. Eleven Republicans voted for the bill: Lamar Alexander (TN), Christopher Bond (MO), Scott Brown (MA), Richard Burr (NC), Thad Cochran (MS), Susan Collins (ME), James Inhofe (OK), George LeMieux (FL), Lisa Murkowski (AK), Olympia Snowe (ME) and George Voinovich (OH). Last week, the Senate passed a separate $150 billion package, which included business tax breaks and extended unemployment and other benefits.

    Speaking of Republicans and spending, the Senate GOP defeated a bid to freeze earmarks for one year, splitting from House Republicans who made the pledge last week. Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) made the case against the pledge, saying, “We would be delegating that [spending] back from Congress to President Obama to make those decisions.” Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) countered, “Folks, we have every power here by the way we appropriate to disallow the use of funds for certain things.” We pause here to remind Senate Republicans who bravely voted to ban earmarks that they don’t have to continue to request them just because they lost the vote.

    Finally, the Senate took care of some truly important business this week — friendlier sentencing for certain cocaine convictions. “Legislation approved by the Senate on Wednesday would significantly reduce the disparity in sentences handed out to those convicted of crack and powder cocaine charges,” the Associated Press reports. “Currently, a person convicted of crack cocaine possession gets the same mandatory jail time as someone with 100 times the same quantity of powder cocaine.” So why the urgency? The AP answers, “That 100-1 ratio has been particularly hard on the black community, where convictions on federal crack laws are more prevalent.” The solution was to reduce the ratio to 18 to one, so we can all rest a little easier knowing that yet another unconstitutional power grab is a little less unfair than it used to be.

    From the Left: ACORN Rotting Into History

    Despite their steadfast denial of wrongdoing, ACORN is closing up shop around the country and putting an end to a saga which has gone on for several election cycles. Predictably however, this hydra just sprouted more heads with many former chapters simply reopening under new names, and apparently they have allies in the Justice Department. The watchdog group Judicial Watch this week released a laundry list of FBI investigative material that shows that ACORN indeed falsified a number of voter registration forms but managed to shift the blame to overzealous canvassers who wanted to make an impression on their superiors.

    The pattern of questionable registration suggested in the documents, coupled with the lax enforcement of election laws by secretaries of state in a number of key battleground states, places the legitimacy of our electoral process into question. ACORN and its affiliate, Project Vote, claim their goal is to encourage democracy (as do many thug dictators), but they focused only on selected populations that they deemed would either favor Democrats or be willing to sell their vote. In the blind pursuit of power, these community organizers think they are above the law. So far, despite having been caught red-handed numerous times on camera, they’re right.

    All this sounds like the tactics of a certain onetime community organizer who’s not letting niceties like following the Constitution get in the way of his agenda, so it’s no wonder the Justice Department turned a blind eye to these allegations. Remember, ACORN was stopped only through the efforts of individuals such as James O’Keefe and Andrew Breitbart, and groups such as Judicial Watch. Who will prevent their outrageous crimes in the 2012 election?

    National Security

    Next Up: Immigration ‘Reform’

    As if the health care takeover alone weren’t enough to weaken the foundation of what had been a nation of laws, Obama’s relentless juggernaut of government transformation continues. The next assault on our freedom takes the form of the so-called “immigration reform,” promised by the Chosen One during his presidential campaign. As a ready reference for the Obamaspeak term “reform,” we recommend George Orwell’s “1984″ (see updated “Doublespeak” glossary under “Hope & Change”).

    The “reform” of which His Worship speaks, however, refers not to real reform, but rather to blanket amnesty for the 12-20 million illegal aliens in the U.S., a payoff to the Latino community that voted two-to-one for Obama in 2008. As envisioned by The One, the “reform” bill would “include a path toward citizenship” for illegal immigrants. Of course, these scofflaws would be required to register, as well as pay taxes and penalties for “violating the law.” We can’t wait for the legal challenges from countless “normal” (i.e., non-alien) felons who would gladly “pay penalties” for violating the law and buy their way out of jail, too.

    Meanwhile, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), terrorists routinely apply for permanent residency in the U.S. by seeking “green cards.” We’re also told that but for diligent follow-up actions by the FBI, a great number of these green cards likely would have been issued. The good news is that the administration has floated another liberty-sapping idea — that is, issuing national ID cards — as a means of preventing illegal aliens from getting jobs. We’re not exactly confident that that’s what such cards would be used for just because the president says so.

    For our part, we’re at a loss to understand why amnesty (or whatever doublespeak term the administration is using for “amnesty”) should be granted to those whose first act upon entering their “new country” was to break the law. Nor can we understand why those who have entered illegally should be granted rights to citizenship before others who have obeyed our laws in trying to seek temporary or permanent residency in the U.S. Finally, we’re at a loss to understand the concept of “retroactive citizenship” associated with entering the U.S. illegally, then having a child who becomes a citizen, and then seeking U.S. citizenship on the basis of that child’s status. If that’s not gaming the system, what is?

    Our recommendations: secure the borders and enforce existing immigration laws; end “chain immigration”; deny amnesty to those who have chosen to violate our laws; change by legislation the current interpretation of the 14th Amendment that grants citizenship to anyone born on American soil, despite parentage; and truly reform immigration by making it easier for skilled workers to enter the U.S. while barring potential threats. While we don’t advocate purposefully targeting any of the illegals already in the U.S., we firmly support swiftly deporting those found in the normal course of domestic law enforcement, with the warning that repeat offenders will likely face a federal penitentiary sentence.

    Department of Military Correctness: No Flag for You

    U.S. troops storm Haiti; raise Old Glory to mark their triumphant occupation! This is, apparently, the twisted view of the Obama administration, which has now banned flying the American flag at U.S. military relief compounds in Haiti. When asked for an explanation, the U.S. government’s Haiti Joint Information Center said, “We are not here as an occupation force, but as an international partner committed to supporting the government of Haiti on the road to recovery.” Never a truer statement was spoken.

    However, that merely obscures the real reasons for the flag ban. Every other military compound in Haiti flies the flag of its nation, as it should. So why is the flag of the United States of America, a nation which has donated far more in money and man-hours to assist Haiti in earthquake recovery than any other nation on earth, the only flag banned from flying in Haiti? The answer, of course, is that our Apologist-in-Chief is ashamed of America, its history, its exceptionalism, and especially its military. November 2012 can’t arrive fast enough.

    Business & Economy

    Regulatory Commissars: Dodd Introduces Financial Regulations

    Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) introduced his financial regulation bill this week, and he’s taking heat from all sides. Nary a one of the 10 Republicans on his committee endorsed the plan, while his liberal colleagues don’t think Dodd went far enough in creating a separate Consumer Financial Protection Agency. The CFPA will still exist, but in Dodd’s plan it will be part of the Federal Reserve, and it will allow the federal government to interfere in the management of any company that deals in credit. This means that the Fed will now stick its nose into car dealerships that issue auto loans, check-cashing companies, and even department stores that have layaway plans.

    The socialist hijinks don’t end there. Under this bill, a permanent $50 billion bailout fund will be established to “rescue” companies that the government deems “too big to fail.” The money for this fund will come from taxes and fees assessed on the nation’s largest financial institutions. These fees will translate into higher consumer fees at your local bank as well as lower interest rates on personal savings accounts. Additionally, the government would instill a “proxy access” provision by which companies would be forced to subsidize campaigns for board membership. This way, left-leaning labor and anti-business groups can more easily become part of the governing body of companies and force their socialist propaganda upon the shareholders. So much for laissez faire capitalism.

    Income Redistribution: IRS Agents Pursue Payment of 4 Cents

    As the government in Washington rushes to spend trillions of dollars it doesn’t have, the IRS is doing its part to pinch every last penny from American taxpayers. In Sacramento, California, two suit-clad IRS agents recently showed up at Harv’s Metro Car Wash to demand payment of 4 cents in back taxes from 2006. Well, 4 cents before taxes and penalties, that is. All told, the pennies debt had accrued an additional $202.31, leaving the owner with $202.35 in payment due.

    Ironically, the federal business call came after the IRS issued a letter last October stating Harv’s “has filed all required returns and addressed any balances due.” Not surprisingly, the IRS refused to comment on the issue, citing “privacy and disclosure laws.”

    Although he complained that the IRS agents “didn’t even get a car wash” during their visit, the owner nonetheless noted the humor in the situation. “It’s hilarious that two people hopped in a car and came down here for just 4 cents. I think [the IRS] may have a problem with priorities.” We think so, too.

    Around the Nation: States to Delay Tax Refunds

    In place of their state tax refund, many Americans may find themselves holding a government IOU as states struggle to meet budget shortfall. USA Today reports, “The recession has tied up cash and caused officials in half a dozen states to consider freezing refunds, in one case for as long as five months,” thus forcing citizens into providing de facto zero-interest loans to their states. New York, for example, may delay $500 million in taxpayer refunds as it faces a $9 billion deficit. In the Aloha State, Hawaiians may have to wait until the end of August to see their refunds.

    According to Scott Pattison, executive director of the National Association of State Budget Officers, the prospect of delayed refunds is “an indicator of how bad [the economy] is. You know things are bad when you have to do that.”

    Of course, the luxury to postpone payments doesn’t apply equally. For taxpayers, late tax payments mean penalties, interest and potentially even wage garnishment, property confiscation and visits to car washes. But when the IRS is late refunding to Americans the money they overpaid, repercussions might include interest on the late refunds — interest paid with taxpayer dollars. Something is very wrong with this picture.

    Culture & Policy

    Census Forms Arrive

    The Constitution prescribes the census in Article I, Section 2, to determine how “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned.” The text reads, “The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such manner as they shall by Law direct.” Those last nine words have led to the permanent codification of census procedure in 1954, which empowers the Secretary of Commerce to determine the form and content of the questionnaire.

    Three years later, Congress enacted section 195, which provided, “Except for the determination of population for purposes of apportionment of Representatives in Congress among the several States, the Secretary shall, if he considers it feasible, authorize the use of the statistical method known as ’sampling’ in carrying out the provisions of this title.” Such sampling is controversial as it enables the alteration of the count based on expected under participation, which tends to be a problem disproportionately for urbanites, immigrants and students. In many ways, sampling resembles the arguments, advanced by Al Gore in 2000, that it was not actual votes that should determine the presidency, but intended ones.

    In 1996, the Supreme Court upheld the sampling bar against a challenge that it systemically resulted in an undercount of racial minorities. The Court reasoned that the census’s purpose was not an accurate measurement either of total people, or the distribution of the population among ethnic/racial groups, but the distribution of the population among states. Six years later, however, the Court approved the process of imputation, which it distinguished from sampling on fairly technical grounds. With reapportionment, and the possible future control of Congress at stake, further attempts to inflate blue state totals seems inevitable.

    DNA Collection on All Who Are Arrested

    Conservatives have long recognized Barack Obama’s penchant for Big Government, but now he’s drawing fire from the Left. In a recent interview with “America’s Most Wanted” host John Walsh, Obama stated his support for mandatory DNA-typing upon arrest, even if the individual is not convicted — or even charged — with a crime. Several states have such laws in place, but Obama’s support extends to the federal level as well. For those on the Left, who believed they were electing a staunch proponent of civil liberties, this comes as quite a blow.

    In expressing their disappointment in their Fearless Leader, leftists make the inevitable comparison with George W. Bush, whom they continue to blame for every problem to have befallen the world within the past decade. Of course, the comparison is flawed. They cite Bush-era policies, such as The Patriot Act, which were designed to protect the country from terrorist threats in the wake of the 9/11 attacks — a far cry from DNA-typing all Americans erroneously arrested and innocent of any wrongdoing.

    The ACLU is currently challenging California’s law on mandatory DNA collection, on behalf of people such as the Oakland woman who was arrested while attending an anti-war rally. Her DNA was collected even though she wasn’t charged with a crime. How pathetically ironic that Obama, once viewed as redeeming the United States from the evils of George Bush, now finds himself on the other side of the fence from the ACLU.

    UN Complains About New HIV Infections Among the ‘Persecuted’

    According to UNAIDS, the recent rise in new HIV infections among homosexuals, prostitutes and intravenous drug users is a result of the “archaic” laws in 85 countries that make these acts illegal. These laws force homosexuals in particular to live in fear of persecution, allegedly without access to services that would allow them to prevent the disease. The head of UNAIDS, Michael Sidibe, is now asking for funds, of course, to start a “prevention revolution,” a costly campaign similar to those against smoking.

    However, Sidibe himself exposes the flaw in his argument. In the United States, where homosexuals are free to live their lives and have the same access to information, medicine and services as heterosexuals, 50 percent of new HIV infections last year were among homosexuals, despite the fact that they make up less than 5 percent of the population. This, Sidibe acknowledges, is due to the complacency of individuals who choose to ignore safe-sex options, such as, well, not engaging in homosexual behavior.

    Another question is whether such a campaign would have a significant — if any — impact in countries where homosexuality, drug use or prostitution is illegal. For example, would an ad on AIDS prevention even be run in one of the seven countries where homosexuality is punishable by death? Perhaps the UN should continue to campaign for these countries to address problem laws within their own borders, rather than asking the rest of the world to foot the bill for the consequences.

    Meanwhile, 18 U.S. senators have called for an end to the ban on homosexuals donating blood. In other words, despite their claims of flawless testing, John Kerry and his ilk would put innocent American lives at risk for the sake of political correctness.

    To Keep and Bear Arms

    Senewa Kahle broke into the house of Charles and Maureen Cassidy one night last weekend in Stuart, Florida. Upon hearing noise, Maureen got out of her bed to investigate. When she saw Kahle, she alerted her husband, who grabbed his 9 mm pistol and readied himself by their door. Charles warned the intruder to stop, but Kahle approached their bedroom anyway. Charles fired several shots, hitting Kahle in the hip. The suspect, who had a knife, then attempted to flee but was found by police in a nearby yard. They also found an accomplice waiting in a getaway car.

    The Cassidys are part of a retirement community. One of the neighbors supported Charles, saying, “If I couldn’t take him out with my hands, I’d have to do something. We’re getting up in age around here. We have to protect ourselves.” Kahle has had previous trouble with the law, including an arrest for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

    And Last…

    Given the importance of the news these days, one might expect ratings for cable news channels to soar. That’s true for one particular network, but not the other two. Fox News was recently ranked number two in terms of primetime viewership (just behind USA Network) and number four overall. Alas, the official channel of the Angry Left, MSNBC, ranked 26th in primetime, while CNN didn’t even crack the top 30. The Cartoon Network, on the other hand, managed the number 13 slot in primetime, thus proving that Americans prefer animated cartoons to live ones. With that in mind, perhaps CNN could change its name to Cartoon News Network. It would increase viewership and provide truth in labeling at the same time.

    Read more excellent articles at

    Filed under: 111th Congress, Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama), Conniving Politicians, Constitution, Demo-gogues, Democrats, Liberals, Marxists, Political Prostitutes, Politicians for the Destruction of America, US Government Tagged: Annie, Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Health Care Takeover Bill, The Patriot Post, Unconstitutional Nationalization

  • The Slaughter On The Southern Border

    By Michelle Malkin

    At a joint press conference with Mexican President Felipe Calderon last year, President Obama vowed to make ending border violence a “top priority.” How’s that hope and change working out? Drug-related crime is out of control, the State Department is warning spring-break vacationers to avoid the Mexican states of Durango, Coahuila and Chihuahua, and the bloodshed has now reached the U.S. consulate’s office.

    A young American consulate worker and her unborn baby were slain this weekend in Mexico, along with her U.S. detention officer husband and the Mexican husband of another consulate worker. The wanton murders appear to have been a coordinated drug cartel hit; the victims had all just left a children’s birthday party in Juarez and were headed across the border back into Texas. The pregnant American official, Lesley Enriquez, is reportedly the first consulate employee to die in drug-related violence since 1985. Her 7-month-old daughter, terrorized by the gunfire while strapped in her car seat, was the lone survivor of the attack.

    The State Department has now authorized the evacuation of dependents of U.S. personnel in six Mexican cities along its northern border with the U.S. And the resort town of Acapulco saw at least 13 murdered over the past week — including four beheadings. The total death toll over the past three years is nearing 20,000.

    Mexican government officials have been quite content to blame their neighbors for the outbreaks; to play the race card; to demand blanket amnesty for illegal aliens from their country trying to flee the violence and misery; and to collect massive infusions of U.S. aid that have fallen into the wrong hands. The question for this White House is: How many more Americans will be targeted for execution before we stop rewarding such fatally arrogant behavior?

    Reminder: With bipartisan support, the Bush administration handed over $1.6 billion to help Mexico control its border chaos in 2008. The crime-fighting package known as the “Merida Initiative” funded helicopters, surveillance equipment, computer infrastructure, the expansion of intelligence databases, anti-corruption initiatives, human rights education and training, and an anti-money laundering program for our southern neighbors.

    President Obama accelerated the release of Merida Initiative cash to Mexico and tossed even more taxpayer funding into the mix. All of this while our own measly border enforcement initiatives have been shortchanged, demagogued or completely abandoned.

    Critics of the Merida Initiative (including yours truly) warned that lax oversight would lead to inevitable plundering of the money by corrupt Mexican government officials and more unabated bloodshed. Calderon cried “racist!” and demanded that the aid be forked over with no strings attached: “Give it to me. And give it to me without conditions,” he told Congress.

    Well, who’s watching over the program now? Who’s measuring its success or failure? Judging from the endless pile of corpses and horrific headlines, the Merida Initiative has turned out to be a boon and a boondoggle for the Mexican thugocracy. The civilian police force is notoriously under the thumb of the drug networks across the country. Infiltrators have penetrated at all levels.

    The Brookings Institution warned two years ago: “Multiple Federal agencies have earned a reputation for ineffectiveness and corruption; among them, the Attorney General’s Federal Investigative Agency, the Ministry of Public Security’s Federal Preventive Police Force, the Ministry of Government’s Center for Investigation and National Security and the Ministry of Finance’s Customs Administration. … State security agencies and the courts have not protected the citizenry effectively. According to surveys carried out by Transparencia Mexicana, the police and justice system are perceived as having worse problems of corruption and inefficiency than other public agencies.”

    Yet, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says the lesson of this weekend’s killing spree is that the U.S. needs to work even closer with the Calderon administration — and at least one House Democrat in Texas, Henry Cuellar, is calling for a second Merida Initiative package. This is a recipe for an even bloodier Mexican Drug Cartel Stimulus Package.

    Contributing Editor is the author of Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies (Regnery 2009).

    Read more excellent articles from

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Blundering Bureaucrats, Conniving Politicians, Democrats, Fanatics, Fear-mongering, Hillary Clinton, Liberals, Mexico, Political Prostitutes, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Spine Donor Politicians Tagged: FSM (Michelle Malkin), Mexican Drug Cartel Wars, Mexican Gun Violence, Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton, Tony, U.S. Foreign Policy, U.S.-Mexico Border

  • The Government Sucks At Most Things

    By Alan CarubaSimpsons-the-scream

    On the eve before Daylight Savings Time, I managed to break a wall clock in the process of trying to grasp it to “spring ahead.” It crashed to a counter top and gave up the ghost. I then went online to Staples and 24 hours later I had a new wall clock. We take such efficiency for granted these days.

    In the midst of the heated debate over healthcare “reform”, we need to remind ourselves of how superior the private sector is to our now bloated, wasteful, and inefficient government. The bill that the Democrats and the president are desperately trying to foist on Americans is a nightmare to be avoided at all costs.

    Recently I received a comparison between Wal-Mart and the U.S. government. Candidly, I do not know the source of the information provided, but I am inclined to believe it.

    “Americans spend $36,000,000 at Wal-Mart every hour of every day. This works out to $20,928 profit every minute. Wal-Mart is bigger than Home Depot, Kroger, Target, Sears, Costco, and K-Mart combined. It employs 1.6 million people and is the nation’s largest private employer. It is the largest company in the history of the world.”

    “Wal-Mart has approximately 3,906 stores in the USA of which 1,906 are super centers. This is more than 1,000 than it had a scant five years ago.”

    If the economy is in trouble, maybe the people who run Wal-Mart should be consulted instead of the 535 members of Congress who appear to not only be utterly clueless, but who have assisted Obama in running up the largest budget deficit in American history.

    This is not a Democrat, Republican or independent problem. It is a government problem starting with the federal government and mimicked by state governments who have also spent themselves into penury.

    Consider the following examples.

    The U.S. Postal Service was established in 1775. It had 234 years to get it right, but it is broke.

    Social Security was established in 1935. It has had 74 years to get it right, but it is broke.

    Fannie Mae was established in 1938 to underwrite the provision of mortgages so that everyone could own a home. It has had 71 years to get it right and it is broke. As the result of the financial meltdown, the government had to seize control of it.

    The War on Poverty started in 1964 and has 45 years to presumably eliminate poverty. $1 trillion in public funds is allocated to “the poor” every year and there is no evidence they are any less poor.

    The Department of Energy was created in 1977 allegedly to lesson the nation’s dependence on foreign, imported oil. It has since ballooned to 16,000 employees with a budget of $24 billion a year. The U.S. imports more oil than ever before because the U.S. government forbids exploration and extraction on 85% of the nation’s continental shelf. It forbids the same in ANWR. It has had 32 years to address the need and it is an abysmal failure.

    Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. They have had 44 years to get it right and they are broke.

    There aren’t that many things that the government does well or does right. Meanwhile, the private sector, corporations and small business enterprises continue to innovate and provide products and services with remarkable efficiency. Both are heavily taxed. U.S. taxes on corporations are the second highest in the world.

    Right now, Americans have to ensure that a Democrat-controlled Congress does not pass a 2,700 page Medicare “reform” because our lives are literally on the line if they do.

    After that, the government has to stop wasting billions to create jobs because the only jobs it creates are government jobs.

    It’s not like we the People can escape responsibility for this. A majority of voters elected these morons.

    © Alan Caruba, 2010

    Alan Caruba writes a daily post at Warning Signs. A business and science writer, he is the founder of The National Anxiety Center.

    Read more thought provoking articles at Warning Signs

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Blundering Bureaucrats, Conniving Politicians, Democracy, Democrats, economy, Fraud/Waste, Liberals, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Public Opinion, Spine Donor Politicians Tagged: Alan Caruba, Democrat Congress Control, Government Jobs, Government Run Enterprises, Health Care Reform Bill, Obamacare, ObamaCare Catastrophe, Private Sector, Tony, Warning Signs

  • Economy Over Environment? Why Not Have Both?

    By Nick Loris

    It’s a common misconception that a tradeoff exists between economic growth and environmental cleanliness. For decades Gallup has been conducting a poll asking about this very tradeoff. According to its latest one, “53 percent said economic growth should be the nation’s top priority, even if the environment has to suffer. Just 38 percent put their priority on environmental protection, even if it limited growth. The share of Americans favoring the environment over growth is the lowest since 1984.”

    In 1990, the results were 71 percent preferred protection of the environment even at the chance of curbing economic growth compared to only 19 percent suggesting economic growth should be the priority. Clearly this is indicative of the current state of our economy but the trend in the Gallup chart shows more people favoring the economy. This year’s results should send a strong signal to Congress that now (but not ever) is not the time to implement policies that would raise the price of energy and stunt economic growth, especially when these policies produce negligible or detrimental environmental effects. Legislation that aims to cut CO2 reduces resources available to grow our economy and become more energy and environmentally efficient. John Tierney from the New York Times says,

    In dozens of studies, researchers identified Kuznets curves for a variety of environmental problems. There are exceptions to the trend, especially in countries with inept governments and poor systems of property rights, but in general, richer is eventually greener. As incomes go up, people often focus first on cleaning up their drinking water, and then later on air pollutants like sulfur dioxide. As their wealth grows, people consume more energy, but they move to more efficient and cleaner sources.”

    The market yields economic and environmental outcomes people desire by allocating scarce resources and inviting competition. Fred Smith of the Competitive Enterprise Institute provides an example:

    Consider, for example, the fears expressed in the early post-war era that copper would soon be in short supply. Copper was the lifeblood of the world’s communication system, essential to link together humanity throughout the world. Extrapolations suggested problems and copper prices escalated accordingly. The result? New sources of copper in Africa, South America, and even the U.S. and Canada were found. That concern, however, also prompted others to review new technologies, an effort that produced today’s rapidly expanding fiber optics links.

    Such changes would be viewed as miraculous if not now commonplace in the industrialized, and predominantly capitalistic, nations of the world. Data assembled by Lynn Scarlett of the Reason Foundation noted that a system requiring, say, 1,000 tons of copper can be replaced by as little as 25 kilograms of silicon, the basic component of sand. Moreover, the fiber optics system has the ability to carry over 1,000 times the information of the older copper wire. Such rapid increases in communication technology are also providing for the displacement of oil as electronic communication reduces the need to travel and commute. The rising fad of telecommuting was not dreamed up by some utopian environmental planner, but was rather a natural outgrowth of market processes.”

    And the importance of well established property rights cannot be stressed enough. When property rights cease to exist, people do not have the proper incentives to devote their own resources to protect and improve their land. It also allows for a conservation market to thrive. Pacific Forest Trust, for instance, makes payments to a tree farm “in return for an agreement to never subdivide its land and always maintain a sustainable forest.” Nature Conservancy and Ducks Unlimited purchase land to create and protect habitats and establish wildlife preserves, and billionaire Ted Turner is attempting to restore bison wildlife by buying property in Montana.

    In today’s economy, it’s no surprise Americans are prioritizing the economy ahead of the environment, but these two issues are not mutually exclusive. We can have our cake and eat it too.

    Contributing Author Nick Loris writes at The Heritage Foundation and he is a Research Assistant at The Heritage Foundation’s Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies.

    Read more informative articles at Heritage – The Foundry

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Blundering Bureaucrats, Climate Alarmists, Climate Change, Conniving Politicians, Environment, Environmental activists, Fear-mongering, Global Warming, Infrastructure Problems, Liberals, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Public Opinion, Spine Donor Politicians Tagged: Carbon Cap And Trade Legislation, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions, Climate Change Religion, Conservation, Energy Costs, Environmental Political Agenda, Global Warming Hype, Heritage – The Foundry, Tony, U.S. Energy Policy

  • Not Worth Obama’s Time

    By Andrew Bolt

    Barack Obama has now scrapped his trip to Australia completely, after already slashing it to one day of ceremonial chit chat.

    A bit embarrassing for Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, who would have loved a visit in this election year, but – like him – Obama is battling to get through his health reforms, and needs to stay to twist arms.

    UPDATE 1

    Mr Obama will now make the trip in June.

    “The president greatly regrets the delay,” Mr Gibbs said. “Our international alliances are critical to America’s security and economic progress, but passage of health-insurance reform is of paramount importance, and the president is determined to see this battle through.”

    UPDATE 2

    According to some media reports, Mr Obama has told wavering Democrats that his Presidency is on the lines over the healthcare debate.

    UPDATE 3

    Obama’s press secretary, Robert Gibbs, makes the announcement of just where Rudd stands:

    As a result, the President telephoned the leader of Indonesia and will call the leader of Australia later this afternoon, and told them that he must postpone his planned visits for a later date so that he can remain in Washington for this critical vote.  The President now expects to visit Indonesia in June.

    So Obama warned the Indonesian president beforehand, but left it to the media to first tell Rudd. And the public commitment to come in June is made to Indonesia, not necessarily to Australia.

    UPDATE 4

    Has Australia just joined the list of American allies Obama takes for granted?

    As Abe Greenwald describes the phenomenon:

    If you’re an enemy we’re sorry; if you’re a friend you’re sorry.

    Or as Paul Mirengoff explains it:

    Perhaps there is a side of him that harbors contempt for nations that find large amounts of common ground with the U.S., a country for which Obama himself feels the need constantly to apologize. Or perhaps, Obama sees himself as a philosopher king, a “neutral” who stands above the usual politics of favoring particular nations. From this lofty, ahistorical perch, it may be possible to view Britain as “the same as the other 190 countries in the world.”

    TonyfromOz adds …..

    UPDATE 3 says a lot. The President personally telephoned the Indonesian President prior to the announcement, but then made the announcement before informing the Australian Prime Minister, thus allowing Australia to find out via a curt media release. Nice!

    Andrew Bolt is a journalist and columnist writing for The Herald Sun in Melbourne Victoria Australia.

    Read more excellent articles from Andrew Bolt’s Blog

    Filed under: America (USA), Asia, Australia, Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama), Blundering Bureaucrats, Democrats, Liberals, Politics, Public Opinion, Spine Donor Politicians Tagged: Andrew Bolt, Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Indonesia, Obama Sorry Tour, Obama World Tour, President Obama, Tony

  • Pulling the Plug on our Constitution

    Democrat Leadership

    ’s Essay

    “If the federal government should overpass the just bounds of its authority and make a tyrannical use of its powers, the people … must appeal to the standard they have formed, and take such measures to redress the injury done to the Constitution as the exigency may suggest and prudence justify.” –Federalist No. 33

    Our Constitution is on life support, and House Democrats are about to pull the plug.

    Leaders of the Democrat Party (“Progressives” as they call themselves, Leftists as we call them) have been unable to garner popular or even Democrat Party support for their plan to socialize our health care system. Fortunately, Republicans are united in their opposition to this one issue.

    Barack Hussein Obama, titular head of the Demos, proclaimed, “I want some courage. I want us to do the right thing.”

    But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi concludes, “Nobody wants to vote for the Senate bill.”   …  

    She is proposing to overtly circumvent our Constitution by way of the “Slaughter Solution.” Rep. Louise Slaughter, chairman of the House Rules Committee, proposes to pass legislation using the “self-executing rule,” which will allow the House to accept the already-passed Senate health care bill by presumption alone, thus negating a formal up-or-down vote by House members.

    Pelosi confessed, “I like it because people don’t have to vote on the Senate bill.”

    Unfortunately, there is precedent in invoking the “self-executing rule” — by Republicans, no less — concerning “mundane” legislation agreed to by House leaders of both parties. Unconstitutional as these precedents are, there is nothing “mundane” about ObamaCare.

    “Slaughter” and “self-executing” may describe both the process and the electoral future of many Democrats in the House.

    Most of the Leftist-controlled political and popular debate about the Democrat proposal to turn over to the central government control of more than 17 percent of the U.S. economy, is focused on one question or another — what will it cost or save, who will pay and who won’t, who will be covered and for what, will there be enough physicians to support this in 10 years, will federal funds be used for abortion, can our economy afford another trillion dollar boondoggle, does it really address the entitlement cost tsunami we’re facing, ad infinitum.

    These might be interesting topics for debate, but none are germane.

    The only relevant debate must begin with First Principles, our Constitution and Rule of Law.

    Does our Constitution allow the Executive and Legislative branches to collaborate to confer authority upon the federal government over, in this case, so-called “health care reform”?

    Those who laid the Foundation of our Constitution were crystal clear about its enumeration of both the authority and limits upon the central government.

    James Madison, our Constitution’s primary author, wrote, “The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined [and] will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation and foreign commerce.”

    Madison continued, “If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one, subject to particular exceptions.”

    (And regarding all those “exemptions” and “exceptions” for members of Congress, I draw your attention to James Madison’s words in Federalist No. 57: “If this spirit shall ever be so far debased as to tolerate a law not obligatory on the legislature, as well as on the people, the people will be prepared to tolerate any thing but liberty.”)

    Thomas Jefferson asserted: “[G]iving [Congress] a distinct and independent power to do any act they please which may be good for the Union, would render all the preceding and subsequent enumerations of power completely useless. It would reduce the whole [Constitution] to a single phrase, that of instituting a Congress with power to do whatever would be for the good of the United States; and as sole judges of the good or evil, it would be also a power to do whatever evil they please. Certainly, no such universal power was meant to be given them. [The Constitution] was intended to lace them up straightly within the enumerated powers and those without which, as means, these powers could not be carried into effect.”

    Clearly, our Constitution, does not authorize Congress to nationalize health care, anymore than it authorizes Congress to do most of what it does today.

    That notwithstanding, Obama and his Leftist cadres in the House and Senate are moving forward with their endeavor to inflict socialized medicine upon the United States.

    They have again, one and all, abandoned their oaths to “support and defend” our Constitution.

    Democrat “leaders” have all been questioned about constitutional authority, and have uniformly asserted that the question is irrelevant.

    Typical of their non-responses was this indignant question from Speaker Pelosi: “Are you serious? Are you serious?”

    Such utter contempt for our Constitution explains why Democrats refuse to support any measure to cite constitutional authority for legislation. For example, the Enumerated Powers Act (HR 1359) would require that “Each Act of Congress shall contain a concise and definite statement of the constitutional authority relied upon for the enactment of each portion of that Act,” but for years, insurmountable obstacles have prevented passage of HR 1359 — and you know who they are.

    Circumventing Rule of Law (Click ^ for larger version)

    As for the Slaughter Solution, Article 1 Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution stipulates, “Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, and that in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively.”

    Typical of Republican protests about this effort to evade the Constitution’s prescription for passage of legislation, Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI) called the ruse “the acme of arrogance” and the “shredding the U.S. Constitution.”

    Unfortunately, more than a few Republicans have dabbled in such unconstitutional chicanery. Thus, I am reminded of the admonition regarding hypocrisy in Matthew 7:4-5. In contemporary terms, Republicans must first demonstrably abide by First Principles before calling on Democrats to do the same.

    The only silver lining to this cloud: If Democrats pass ObamaCare, every medical complaint by a Democrat constituent will be hung around their necks.

    Fellow Patriots, stand firm for Essential Liberty for we still hold these Truths.

    Read more informative articles at

    Filed under: 111th Congress, Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama), Blogs in Support of Our Constitution, Conniving Politicians, Constitution, Demo-gogues, Democracy, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Liberals, Marxists, News and Views, Political Prostitutes, Politicians for the Destruction of America, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid Tagged: Annie, Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY), The Patriot Post

  • Internet Crime – Complaints on the Rise

    Internet Crime Complaint CenterWith the release of IC3’s 2009 annual report, it’s clear that the need to be aware of cyber scams is more important than ever.

    During 2009, did you receive an e-mail that claimed to be from the FBI and asked for money or personal information?

    If you did, you’re not alone—e-mail scams that misused the Bureau’s name represented the highest percentage (16.6) of complaint types submitted last year to the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), according to its latest annual report.

    All told, IC3 received 336,655 complaints during 2009, a hefty 22.3 percent increase from 2008.

    In addition to the fake FBI e-mails, rounding out the top five complaint categories were:

    • Non-delivered merchandise and or non-payment, in which either a seller didn’t ship a promised item or a buyer didn’t pay for an item (11.9 percent);
    • Advance fee fraud, when a victim was asked to give money upfront, often for goods or services that never materialized (9.8 percent);
    • Identity theft, when someone either stole or tried to steal a person’s identity or some kind of identity information (8.2 percent); and
    • Overpayment fraud, when a “buyer” sent a victim who was selling something a legitimate-looking check or money order (that turned out to be counterfeit) for an amount greater   …    than the price of an item being sold, and then asked the seller to deposit the payment, deduct the actual sale price, and return the difference (7.3 percent).
    Year Complaints Loss
    2009 336,655 $559.7 million
    2008 275,284 $265 million
    2007 206,884 $239 million
    2006 207,492 $198 million
    2005 231,493 $183 million
    2004 207,449 $68 million

    Of the 336,655 complaints submitted to IC3 last year, just under half—146,663—were referred to local, state, or federal law enforcement agencies for further action. Most of those cases involved fraud and financial losses by the victims. The losses from the referred cases totaled $559.7 million.

    The complaints not referred to law enforcement generally had no financial losses—for example, a victim received a fraudulent unsolicited e-mail but didn’t act on it—or involved victims and perpetrators who both lived outside the United States.

    But complaints not directly referred to law enforcement are still valuable—they’re accessible by law enforcement and are used to analyze trends, gather intelligence, and educate the public. So if you feel you’ve been targeted, please submit a complaint to IC3, whether you lost money or not.

    Some of the more popular e-mail scams during 2009 (and scams to watch out for during 2010) included:

    • A new spin on the “hit-man” scam, in which individuals received an e-mail from an “assassin” who claimed he was going to kill them, but who said they would be spared if they sent money because someone in his organization knew a member of their family and pled for their lives.
    • Spam or pop-ups offering free astrological readings, but only after birthdates and birthplaces were provided. Victims were then enticed into purchasing a full-fledged reading with the promise they would find out something favorable was about to happen. Of course, they never received the reading.
    • Economic stimulus scams, where victims received a recorded phone message directing them to websites where they could apply for government stimulus money after first entering personal information and paying a small fee. Needless to say, no stimulus money was received.
    • Fake pop-up ads for anti-virus software that warned of the existence of computer viruses but actually downloaded malicious code when clicked.

    For more information on Internet crime, read the full report.

    Filed under: Cyber Crimes, FBI, News and Views Tagged: Ed, Scams

  • PA Referendum, Bonus Scandal, Integrity

    Tim Potts News:

    First Senator Signs the Petition

    Sen. Jim Ferlo, D-Allegheny, is the first state senator to sign the petition for a Constitution convention referendum this fall. He joins seven members of the House who already have signed:
    Rep. Barbara McIlvaine-Smith, D-Chester
    Rep. Bryan Lentz, D-Delaware
    Rep. John Bear, R- Lancaster
    Rep. RoseMarie Swanger, R-Lebanon
    Rep. John Galloway, D- Bucks
    Rep. Scott Conklin, D-Centre
    Rep. Steve Santarsiero, D-Bucks

    We also can report two other candidates who have taken a stand on a convention. Susan Rzucidlo is a Democrat challenging incumbent Rep. Chris Ross, R-Chester.

    Finally, Russ Diamond, a Republican candidate for lieutenant governor, is promoting his own version of a Constitution convention. Like Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jack Wagner, who also supports a convention, Diamond has not signed the petition.

    And here is more editorial support:
    Both parties realize constitutional convention is necessary, Harrisburg Patriot-News, March 14.

    Bonus Scandal Jury Still Thinking


    If Murphy’s Law still applies on the day after St. Patrick’s Day, no sooner than we dispatch this edition of DR News will jurors announce the guilt or innocence of four defendants in the Bonus Scandal. After deliberating for two hours last Friday and three full days so far this week, the eight women and four men continue to work. Although they informed Judge Richard Lewis that they have reached one verdict, the judge ruled that no verdicts could be announced until the jury is ready to announce all four.

    Rather than wait any longer for the news, we’ll give you this much and promise a special edition when the jury has determined what happened.

    Meanwhile, former House Democratic Leader Bill DeWeese, D-Greene, had been invited to testify in the ongoing trial. Instead, he invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Click here for a column by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Brian O’Neill.

    Campaigning on Integrity

    One candidate for an open senate seat believes an integrity agenda will separate himself from the pack of three Democrats and one Republican seeking to replace Sen. Raphael Musto, who retires this year. Rep. John Yudichak, D-Luzerne, recently announced plans to introduce legislation that would

    • require lawmakers to produce receipts in order to get reimbursed for daily expenses (per diems).
    • limit the number of terms a lawmaker can serve in leadership.
    • authorize a referendum for a Constitution convention for a few key issues.

    Click here for a report from the Wilkes-Barre Times Leader.

    It is entirely possible that this is nothing but campaign rhetoric, as some comments after the news story suspect. However, there is value in talking about these issues and having legislation introduced. Citizens can’t beat something with nothing, so it helps to have proposals in writing. Click here for an editorial from the Beaver County Times. As of this writing, though, the bills have not been introduced.

    What becomes of Yudichak’s proposals is another story that may have more to do with the three-way field of Democrats seeking the senate seat. As an incumbent representative, Yudichak could get a boost from fellow Luzerne Democrat and House Majority Leader Todd Eachus. If Yudichak has any juice with Eachus, we may see action. Or if House Democrats who oppose reform have enough juice to threaten Eachus’ hold on leadership, Yudichak’s proposals may go nowhere.

    It’s worth recalling that the only thing standing between 12.5 million citizens and the best state government in America are 129 people: a majority of 102 in the House, a majority of 26 in the Senate, and one governor.

    Question:

    • Will your representative and senator be two of the 129?

    A New Reality

    We don’t have to settle for whatever government lawmakers, judges and governors want to give us.

    1. Click here to sign the petition for a referendum on a Constitution convention.
    2. Forward this edition of DR News to others and ask them to sign the petition.
    3. Donate to keep the pressure on.

    A new reality is up to us, because only we can keep democracy rising!

    Thanks!

    P.O. Box 618, Carlisle, PA 17013

    Filed under: Democracy, News and Views, PA Constitution, PA General Assembly, PA Legislative Branch, Pennsylvania Tagged: Democracy Rising PA, Ed