Author: Thers

  • Late Night: Conservative Bloggers More Depraved/Deranged/Stupid Than Osama bin Laden

    The entire Right Blogosphere shares an ideology more menacing, more insidious, more dimwitted, than that of Al Qaeda.True story.

    Take, for instance, noted imbecile Christopher Horner, whose effluvia dribbles forth at one of Breitbart’s sites (”Big Drool,” as opposed to “Big Whine” and “Big Stupid“). Clearly, Horner is someone who is a worse person than Osama bin Laden. Read this, which is to do with reports that bin Laden’s latest wacky mix-tape is about climate change, as I suppose the whole radical loony religious stuff was getting kinda stale.

    So the Washington Post reports that bin Laden is still furious about the U.S. causing global warming…

    The big problem I return to is that bin Laden and the fundamentalists among the green movement share more than just global warming fervor and rhetoric. They seem to share an objective.

    Right: if you accept the actual science of anthropogenic climate change, on the grounds that it is, in fact, actual science, you’re just as bad as Al Qaeda. Not surprisingly, the rest of the wingnut playpen screeched similarly: Al Gore and Al Qaeda are exactly the same, and not just because they have the same first name, which is already plenty suspicious.

    Of course, what we have just learned is that contemporary American conservatives are even more fanatically devoted to a crackpot ideology that more fully prevents them from appreciating empirical reality than Osama bin Laden. Which is pretty impressive, really. Well done.

    And in so denying scientific reality, they really will be destroying America more effectively than Osama bin Laden. Even better done!

    Also their websites are more numerous and more idiotic than Al Qaeda’s, for toppers.


  • Late Night: More SOTU Crap — The View from Wingnuttia

    sad.clownI kind of liked the SOTU. Obama gives a better speech than the last guy who had this gig. As for the Liberal Goodies, the student loan proposal really would be a radical improvement over the current shite state of affairs as far as paying for higher education goes; getting serious about deep-sixing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell is indeed “the right thing to do”; and shoveling money at community colleges, particularly community college English professors, is just sound policy. The devil is in the details of course, and maybe I’m just getting fluffed, but I like getting fluffed. Who doesn’t!

    But speaking as a pinko myself, there’s no way that the real Obama (by any sane measure an incredibly cautious centrist with an abiding faith in the conventional wisdom, to politely understate matters) could ever have given a speech that would please me more than the speech the imaginary Obama gave tonight. This would be the speech given by Obama the Radical Marxist, as we learn from the “live-blog” at the Wingnut Flagship, Red-State.

    Highlights of the Red-State “live-blog” are the tasteful comments about Michelle Obama’s commitment to taking on the problem of childhood obesity:

    GopTiger: Michelle “tackle” obesity? Looked at her _________ recently?

    Hilarious! He means “ass”! He said Michelle Obama has a fat ass! Comedy!

    Or then you have Jonah Goldberg tweeting about how he finds somebody else’s personal appearance comical:

    Pelosi’s got a really weird, glassy-eyed, Bride of Chucky thing going.

    Because Jonah doesn’t himself have anything “going” that should be pointed out.

    And then you have Erick the Son of Erick, Red-State guru, impressed by the hilariously staged Racial Outreach of the GOP SOTU response on the part of Virginia governor McDonnell, a performance that had all the dynamic appeal of an inept late night infomercial about exciting new breakthroughs in masking tape:

    McDonnell has the multi-ethnic thing going on.

    Expect the GOP to record huge gains in the minority vote going forward, because if there’s one thing those folks like, it’s seeing people who look like them standing around like furniture.

  • Late Night: If You Don’t Like That “F Word,” I Have Another One for You

    A person naming himself “Mark W. Hendrickson, Ph. D” — Ph. D. mind you, so you know he’s a clever fellow — has made an Astonishing Discovery in the pages of  the American Thinker (whose logo is Uncle Sam taking a crap, for inexplicable reasons). Namely, even though liberals like to call conservatives “fascists,” the real “fascists” are in fact… liberals! Who knew! Also he makes a clever play on words. Read this carefully, it is very ingenious:

    Its use is shunned in polite company. It coarsens political discourse. Its introduction into conversation raises hackles and stirs emotions. It carries so much connotative baggage that its denotative significance is often totally eclipsed. It is a verbal bomb-thrower’s delight: a virtual slap in the face, a dismissive epithet, the ultimate insult, shorthand for “You’re a bad person and beneath contempt.” I refer, of course, to the political F-word: “fascist.”

    Ha ha ha. It’s funny because you thought he was about to say “fuck.” How amusing.

    Bleah. This shtick was, of course, h0ary & ancient even when Jonah Goldberg was farting it out two years ago (has it been that long? How time flies when you’re paying attention to idiots who think they have an Original Thesis). In the Wingnut Komedy Klub no doubt they’re still yukking it up over jokes about airline food. Or perhaps 8-Tracks. And definitely stuff like Women Drivers, golf, and the effeminacy of homosexual men. Hi-lair-ee-us. (The “F-Word” thing alone is by now so tedious as to be a species of powerful barbiturate in its own right.)

    This is not to say that Hendrickson doesn’t introduce some novelties, which sort of makes him like a Rapping Weatherman, or something, though without the, uh, novelty value.

    In high school, we learned that “fascism” was a “right-wing” ideology. Then I had an epiphany at Oxford University in 1974. A Conservative Member of Parliament, Enoch Powell, was scheduled to give a speech. I was just beginning to grow out of my youthful flirtation with socialism, so I was curious to hear this man’s unfamiliar defense of free markets.

    Regrettably, due to a conflict, I wasn’t able to attend, so instead I eagerly awaited the arrival of the morning paper to read about Powell’s speech. When the paper came, I read that Powell had been prevented from giving his speech by students who drowned out his voice with shouts of “fascist, fascist!” until he finally gave up and departed.

    The proverbial light bulb lit up in my head.  The real fascists in this drama were the leftists/socialists who censored free speech. That’s when I came to understand that fascism, with all its bullying and suppression of individual liberties, was a left-wing phenomenon.

    Ah, the “proverbial light bulb.” Now, that’s good writing, because Hendrickson thinks outside the box and eschews cliches, showing instead of telling and letting the chips fall where they may on the place where the cookie crumbles. But you have to love the bit about Enoch Powell, who, while not a fascist or even a “fascist” (he was an odd duck, surely) most certainly did roundly deserve to have people yell at him at various points in his career. (See “Blood, Rivers of.”)

    The part where he says climate change scientists are worse than Hitler is pretty tired, though, as is this remark: “I have reservations, though, about invoking the inflammatory political F-word. Due to its repeated misuse over the decades, classifying policies as “fascist” today is likely to be interpreted as petty name-calling (as opposed to serious, objective criticism). Let us, then, give the term “fascism” a decent burial and leave it in the past.” The “fascism is overused but it’s really liberals who are fascists no backsies nyah” stuff is just crusty dusty and played, very Milli Vanilli, you know?

    Overall, I give Hendrickson an “F.” For “Fuckhead.”