Category: Internet

  • How to Find Popular Keywords for Search Engine Optimization

    Search engine optimization is the practice of using keywords and keyword phrases in web content.  These terms tell search engines what the article, blog post, or other online content is about and match the webpage to user searches.

    Properly optimized content ranks higher in organic searches.  Use these tips to find popular keywords and keyword phrases that are not saturated with content from other websites.

    How to Use Google’s AdWords Keyword Tool to Find Popular Keywords
    260004685 8d78d77db0 How to Find Popular Keywords for Search Engine Optimization
    The Google Adwords Keyword Tool was designed for companies buying online advertising space; however, is it a great tool for online writers and web content creators, as well.

    Type several words relevant to the article or webpage topic in the Keyword Tool search box.  Click on “Get Keyword Ideas” to begin searching for information on the keywords.  The tool will also suggest popular keywords related to the search terms, so a list of five keywords could generate fifty results or more.

    Understanding Keyword Search Results

    The default search tool settings show the following information about suggested keywords:

    • Advertiser Competition
    • Local Search Results for the previous month
    • Global Monthly Search Volume

    A drop-down box above the results list allows you to access additional columns of information, including the average cost per click, volume trends, and estimated ad position.

    Advertiser competition is not important unless you are trying to write content designed to attract high cost per click ads to generate AdSense revenue.  In that case, an empty advertiser competition box indicates a lack of advertiser interest in the topic.

    Global monthly search volume is the most important criteria in keyword research for search engine optimization.

    Comparing Search Volume and Results Volume

    Click the title of the global monthly search volume column to sort the list so the most searched terms are at the top.  Working down the list, search each keyword and phrase in a regular Google search.

    Look at the volume of results for each keyword or phrase.  A term that generates millions of results is highly competitive and it is unlikely that new content will rank near the top of the list.

    Consider the quality of results, as well.  The goal is to find keywords and phrases that might propel the web content to the front page, or top ten, in a Google search.  Are the other top ten results from credible news sources, government or professional organizations, or large corporations?  There is little chance of ranking on the front page with this type of competition.

    Find Popular Keywords for Search Engine OptimizationHow to Choose the Right Keywords and Phrases

    People have different criteria for keyword selection and look for a specific ratio of acceptable search volume vs. search results.

    To develop a workable formula takes time and testing.  Start by finding a keyword or phrase with over 1,000 monthly searches and less than one million results.  Optimize the article by using the primary keyword phrase in the URL, if possible, and in the article headline, introductory paragraph, bolded subheadings, and throughout the body text.

    Use four to six complementary keywords in the subtitle, introductory paragraph, bolded subheadings, and throughout the body text.  Do not simply repeat any one phrase throughout the article; it must read naturally to the reader.  Using a variety of related terms helps you write fluidly and indicates the webpage’s relevance on the topic to search engines.

    Testing and Developing a Keyword Strategy

    A number of variables affect how well a webpage ranks in organic searches and no one knows the exact formula used by popular search engines like Google.

    A blog post on a blog hosted on a free platform such as Blogger, for example, may not rank as high as an article published on a popular online magazine’s website, for example, even if the blog post is better optimized.

    Track the performance of several pieces based on keywords chosen for their search volume to search engine results ratio to find the winning formula for your blog posts, articles, or website content.

    Related posts:

    1. Important facts about keywords Important facts about keywords Keywords and phrases form a good…
    2. Going beyond SEO with Latent Semantic Indexing Many people who write content for the web will advise…
    3. Top 5 seo tips to get started This article lists the 5 first things you should do…


  • AboutUs Buys Jyte, Works with JanRain

    Gregory T. Huang wrote:

    Portland, OR-based AboutUs announced this week it has acquired Jyte.com, a social website where people can make claims, vet ideas, and comment on others’. Financial terms were not given. Jyte uses RPX, the flagship technology of Portland startup JanRain that lets people use a single portable identity and login across different websites. AboutUs, which is backed by Seattle-based Voyager Capital, says it plans to implement RPX on its own site as well. Last month, JanRain announced its $3.25 million Series A round led by DFJ Frontier.







  • Rue La La Closure Promotes Haiti Relief

    Wade Roush wrote:

    Invitation-only discount clothing site Rue La La, a part of Boston-based Retail Convergence Incorporated (RCI), has closed its online boutiques until Saturday morning and is asking shoppers to donate instead to relief efforts in Haiti following the devastating earthquake there. At the Rue La La website, a statement from Rue La La CEO Ben Fischman says, “Out of respect for those who have lost loved ones, their shelter, and life’s basic necessities in this tragedy, we cannot stand by while relief efforts are underway without taking action. We are halting our Boutiques from now until Saturday at 8 AM ET. We ask that instead you take this time—as we are—to make a donation to the American Red Cross Haiti Relief and Development Effort.” RCI’s other e-commerce property, SmartBargains, does not appear to be closed today, although the site prominently displays a link to the American Red Cross’s Haitian relief donation page.







  • Venture Investors Spread Holiday Cheer to Mass. Startups in December: Companies Wrap Up $224 Million in Funding

    Erin Kutz wrote:

    Santa was good to the Massachusetts high-tech economy in December. Very good. Roughly $224 million poured into the state’s startups in 36 equity deals, representing 20 percent more money and more than 50 percent more deals than Bay State startup companies saw in November.

    And November venture funding-22 deals worth $186 million-was nothing to scoff at. It’s now the fourth-highest dollars and deals totals since Xconomy started tracking monthly venture figures in June, with data supplied by our New York-based partner ChubbyBrain, an information services company with tools for investors, startups, and hopeful entrepreneurs.

    The money Massachusetts startups raked in during December-the second-highest dollar total and highest number of deals tracked by Xconomy so far-suggests that the growth regained in November after a brief fall slump is continuing. Venture funding in October had shrunk to $169 million across 19 deals, compared to September’s $228 million in 25 deals, currently the best month in dollar terms to date.

    Venture deals were a bit more egalitarian in December than they were in the previous month. The top five November deals were worth $21 million or more, the highest one ringing in at $31.3 million. The sixth-biggest round, however, dropped sharply to $6.7 million. December deals didn’t display the same staggering gaps in dollar values, though. The biggest disparity was the $4 million difference between No. 1 Afferent Pharmaceuticals and runner up Pixtronix. The deals that followed all trailed each other’s heels much more closely.

    The top deals in December were also more diverse in the sectors they represent when compared to the month before. Five out of the top six November deals were in healthcare (a software company captured the month’s No. 1 slot). In December, by contrast, the top six included companies from healthcare, software, electronics, Internet, and mobile and telecommunications.


    Massachusetts December Venture Capital Deals

    The aforementioned Afferent, a Boston-based company working on developing treatments to chronic pain, topped our December list with $23 million in Series A funding. Mobile display maker Pixtronix, based out of Andover, MA, came in second with …Next Page »







  • Google in China: Ex-Microsoft VP Kai-Fu Lee’s Past Report Might Point to What Went Wrong

    Google
    Gregory T. Huang wrote:

    In the fascinating maelstrom that is Google in China, one thing is clear: this affects all of us. It’s not about whether Google’s decision to draw a line in the sand is based on ideals versus profits. It’s not about whether the Chinese government will open up its Internet policies and play ball with the rest of the world. It’s about the future of every company on the Web—including Microsoft, Amazon, RealNetworks, and all the smaller companies out there.

    In case you haven’t been following every twist and turn, earlier this week Google said it might pull out of China following its investigation of a cyber attack that it says originated in China, targeting at least 20 large companies (including Google). One apparent goal of the attacks was to access the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists. Google said it is “no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.”

    Google’s statement is very carefully worded. It doesn’t explicitly accuse Chinese officials of any wrongdoing. But the reactions of a lot of people, from the media to tech-business leaders to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, have helped portray the situation as a cut and dried “Google (and freedom of information) vs. China (and censorship)” issue.

    I want to tackle one piece of this sprawling puzzle. And that is the huge, ongoing cultural challenge that Google, Microsoft, and other western companies face in setting up business operations in China. No, this is not a new issue. But one part of the Google announcement was particularly telling: “We want to make clear that this move was driven by our executives in the United States, without the knowledge or involvement of our employees in China who have worked incredibly hard to make Google.cn the success it is today.”

    Google has now been up and running in China for four years. That is not a lot of time to build deep relationships. And it certainly doesn’t help that Google’s biggest competitor in China, Baidu, is backed by the Chinese government.

    Heading up Google’s China effort until recently was Kai-Fu Lee, the controversial ex-Microsoft vice president who founded Microsoft Research Asia in Beijing in 1998. Lee, a Chinese high-tech celebrity and education leader, was head of Google China from 2006 until last September, when he left the company to create an incubator in Beijing for Chinese high-tech startups.

    In my view, it may not be a coincidence that the current situation has come about so soon after Lee’s departure. Frankly, I’m surprised this all didn’t come to a head much sooner for Google. But perhaps it was through Lee’s efforts that it didn’t—or maybe, conversely, it’s part of why Lee left Google. (I’ve pinged him for comment, but haven’t heard back on this topic.)

    Which brings me to some analysis. Back in 2003, while he was at Microsoft, …Next Page »







  • Best practices of Twitter

    1. Don’t follow a gazillion people

    Especially not if you don’t have alot of people following you back.
    First of all, there is a thing called “information overload”, which will happen if you follow too many people, and you don’t manage them well in lists.
    Second, your follow/following ratio is a major factor for Google to rate your authority on Twitter. Do you want to improve your blog’s rankings using Twitter? Then make sure your ratios are ok, and your tweets (with links to your blog), and your profile (with link to your blog) will be indexed better and ranked higher.
    best practices of twitter
    2 Don’t forward unsollicited links via DM

    If you need to send someone a quick link for something that you were or will be discussing, no problem, but don’t go around sending links to all your followers via DM. It’s a pain, don’t do it. You’re cluttering up people’s Tweet-inbox, and if they have the mail option set, their mailbox too. If you want to broadcast your url to your followers, do it in the main timeline. It’s easily ignored, and doesn’t clutter things up.

    3 Don’t send an automated thank you message.

    The thing is a bit the same as the one above. My Twitter inbox is filled with “Thanks for following, looking forward to tweeting with you!”. No, you’re not. You just set up an auto-follow-message, and you will most probably never even look at tweets, let alone reply to any of them. If you don’t have the time to send every new follower you have a personalized DM, then it is better not to send them a DM at all.

    4 Don’t make your tweets too long

    One of the powers of Twitter is to retweet what others have tweeted that you found interesting. However, if your tweet is too long, near the 140 characters, there is no place to put the RT and username in front of the tweet. If you have to start puzzling which characters or words to leave out to stay within 140 characters, without breaking the message the original tweeter waanted to convey, you mostly just leave the tweet be, and forget about retweeting.
    A good rule of thumb to use? Take your own twittername’s amount of characters, ad 5, and make sure you leave that much space in your tweets to facilitate retweeting.

    5 Don’t overdo retweeting of contests and giveaways

    Unless you want to use your twitteraccount to gather all these contests and giveaways and retweet them so others can see them all in one place, don’t overdo it!
    Everybody wants to join a contest, or wants some free stuff, but no one likes their whole timeline to be filled with “retweet to participate in our free cookie contest” messages.

    6 Behave as if you’re on a coctailparty

    Treat Twitter as a coctailparty, and behave the same way. Do you want to be the popular person on the party? Then behave social, happy, talkative, but don’t overdo it. Don’t scare people. Don’t talk bad about people. Don’t gossip. Don’t yell at people because they stopped following you.
    Bottom line: Be Nice!

    Related posts:

    1. Twitter? What is it about? Twitter is a microblog, or a status updating social networking…
    2. 7 Helper Applications that Make Twitter Even More Fun Every day it seems microblogging becomes more and more a…
    3. Hashtags in Twitter Question: when Twittering, I often see these words with a…


  • OpenCandy Builds Online Marketplace For Free Software Downloads

    OpenCandy logo
    Bruce V. Bigelow wrote:

    [Updated 1/14/2010, 9:37 am. See Below] Darrius Thompson tells me he’s been involved for a long time in the software community, and he sees how consumer acceptance can be fluky. Some new software products get widespread distribution, and some go nowhere. Thompson says he believes in open-source products, but sometimes it doesn’t seem to matter if the software is available for free or not.

    The runaway hit-or-miss nature of software development reminds him of the music industry. “Some of these guys were just taking in enough money to pay their server bill,” he says.

    But Thompson tells me he’s also noticed that consumer acceptance tends to be much higher when users are offered a free software download at just the right moment. For example, during the years he worked at San Diego-based DivX (NASDAQ: DIVX), which provides audio-video compression technology, users would often readily agree to download software for a “surround sound” system if it was offered while they already were installing the DivX codec. Figuratively speaking, it’s like offering a free download of peanut butter while you’re installing jelly.

    It was that realization that led Thompson and Chester Ng to found OpenCandy in 2007 with a handful of other ex-DivXers. The San Diego startup operates a Web-based network that allows a software publisher to advertise its product—and to offer it as optional download—while another program is being installed on a user’s computer. Both are usually offered as free downloads.

    [Updates to clarify that OpenCandy’s system selects the software offer] OpenCandy helps facilitate the process by providing software publishers what it calls “a tiny plug-in” they can integrate into their installer, which enables publishers to recommend complementary software or services that might be valuable to their users. “Software developers are doing their best to make their advertising as targeted as possible,” Thompson explains. The publisher picks the products they want to recommend and our network automatically chooses the best offer for each consumer. For example, through OpenCandy’s partnership with San Francisco-based Nitro PDF Software, a user who downloads PrimoPDF, a popular free alternative to Adobe Acrobat, gets an offer to also install Snagit, a free program for capturing, sharing, and editing anything users see on their computer screen.

    While it’s possible to do tricky things to get users to install software, Thompson says OpenCandy’s business model calls for recommending good software and ensuring that consumers opt into the download. “We really like the idea of openness. That’s the way we operate internally. We really believe in transparency, and in open systems in general,” Thompson says. The founders conveyed that sentiment when they named …Next Page »







  • Do You set Controls on Your Kids’ iPhone?

    We once worried about kids finding the wrong places to surf on the Internet and of being contacted by unsavory people.

    Now it’s their iPhones, iPods,  iTouch, Blackberry and Internet access on their ordinary cell phones we must be concerned about.

    Cell phone image: sxc.hu

    Cell phone image: sxc.hu

    I discovered that my granddaughter can access the Internet with a new gadget she received for Christmas (and paid for mostly herself).  Nearly 19 and away at college, she makes most of her own decisions.  However, she seems, fortunately, to follow guidelines she learned from her family.  Until she showed me her new iPod Touch, I hadn’t realized she could access the Internet any place available with her laptop.

    So…if your youngsters are younger, and have one of these electronic gadgets…as so many kids do nowadays…do you set controls in this area, as well as the computer?

    Here’s an article, How to Set Parental Controls on the iPhone, that explains some methods of control you may not be aware of.  You also can block music you don’t want them to download and YouTube applications you don’t want them to access.

    Post from: Blisstree

    Do You set Controls on Your Kids’ iPhone?

  • RealNetworks CEO Rob Glaser Steps Down

    Rob Glaser
    Gregory T. Huang wrote:

    Rob Glaser, the founder and chief executive of Seattle-based RealNetworks, has stepped down, according to a company statement. Glaser will remain chairman of the board.

    “After nearly 16 years, I’ve decided it’s time for me to step away from day-to-day operations,” Glaser said in a statement. “I’m grateful to all of our stakeholders—customers, partners, shareholders, and most of all, employees—for the support and commitment they’ve given to RealNetworks. I remain committed to the company and look forward to continuing to serve in my capacity as board chairman.” (See Glaser’s farewell note to Real’s employees here, from the Seattle Times.)

    Real’s board of directors appointed Robert Kimball as president and acting CEO, and new board member. Kimball joined RealNetworks in 1999 and was most recently the company’s general counsel and executive vice president of corporate development. Glaser said a formal search process for a permanent CEO will begin soon.

    The move seems to be part of a broader shakeup of the senior leadership team at Real (NASDAQ: RNWK). Yesterday, the company reported in an SEC filing that chief operating officer John Giamatteo will resign as of April 2. Giamatteo was also president of the company’s technology products and services division. The news was reported by PaidContent, TechFlash, and other outlets.

    In November, RealNetworks laid off 4 percent of its worldwide staff (about 70 employees) as a result of the economic recession and cost-cutting measures. The company reported a small profit for the third quarter of last year, its first profitable quarter since the beginning of 2008.







  • Visible Technologies Tracks Down $22M for Global Expansion

    Visible Technologies
    Gregory T. Huang wrote:

    Things are really heating up for Visible Technologies. The Bellevue, WA-based maker of software to help companies monitor social media and manage their online reputations announced today it has raised a Series C funding round worth $22 million. The round was led by a new investor—Investor Growth Capital (IGC), the growth-stage venture arm of Investor AB. Existing investors Ignition Partners, Centurion Holdings, In-Q-Tel, and WPP also participated.

    “This funding allows us to accelerate our growth path to continue meeting the demands of global customers and help them drive real business results through successful online consumer engagement,” said Visible CEO Dan Vetras in a statement. “We chose IGC as our partners to lead the round for their market expertise, track record in creating sector-leading companies and ability to help us expand in markets outside North America, especially in Europe.”

    Visible Technologies was founded back in 2003, and its cutting-edge technology finds positive and negative content about a brand online, for example, and uses keyword placement, optimization, and linking techniques to make the positive entries pop up higher in search-engine results. In the past year, the company has raised smaller amounts of equity and debt financing—it had raised a total of $23.5 million as of October 2009. Its customers include Microsoft, Autodesk, and Xerox.







  • Net Neutrality: The Story of The Seven Pipes

    Tim Rowe wrote:

    Today at 4:30 at the Media Lab’s Bartos Theatre, the FCC will hold a public workshop to discuss net neutrality policy. What is the importance of net neutrality to the innovation community?

    We can learn a great deal about this by examining the stories of the seven pipes going into most American homes. Most homes are connected to pipes that carry water, electricity, telephony, cable TV, sewer, gas and Internet. (You can think of the Internet as a separate pipe, anyway, even though it usually comes in over the cable or telephone line.) Yet only one of these pipes has historically offered everyone the chance to innovate on top of it. We should be able to learn something about the importance of open innovation by examining the “innovation histories” of these seven pipes.

    Lets start with water, gas, and sewer. Perhaps Xconomy readers can point out some innovation in the last couple of decades in these areas. There sure aren’t many.

    How about electricity, telephony and cable TV? These sectors often sport a degree of competition, usually with two to three players offering alternatives in each geographic market. But competition is not the same as open innovation. Electric utilities, for example, have struggled for years to broadly adopt a single modest innovation: the ability to pour power back into the grid. Telephony saw some minor innovations about 20 years ago—things like caller ID and *69—but nothing since. Cable TV saw the addition of a few more channels, and a few more pixels, but nothing that fundamentally expands what it does for us.

    And then there is the Internet. Open competition on the Internet “pipe” has spawned so much innovation that industries are being turned upside down. Ask folks in the music, news, broadcast media, and telephony industries, to name a few. Have you been to a travel agency recently? How often do you physically walk into a bank? Many people believe the Internet changed the course of the most recent Presidential election. Oh, and it has placed the greater part of all the world’s knowledge at our fingertips. Enough said.

    Some might say this comparison is unfair—that the other pipes could never have had this kind of impact. Of course, we’ll never know. But if you think that this level of innovation could have been achieved if the Internet were, like the other pipes, managed by a single large, benevolent service provider, one need look no farther than AOL to see what that really did look like.

    In the early days, AOL was the Internet, except that it was under the aegis of a single, large, benevolent service provider. And AOL was great. We all remember chat rooms. But there is no comparison between the innovation AOL spawned and what the “open Internet” would later bring.

    Companies providing Internet service would like to be able to control what flows on our Internet pipes, giving preference to their own services, and squelching others’ offerings. That would be a recipe for turning the Internet back into AOL. Recently, the FCC has started to put in place policies to prevent that. Let’s support this move. We don’t want a future in which the Internet pipe works like the other pipes.







  • Chinese Citizens Hold Memorial For Google As It Awaits Execution [Google]

    In case you haven’t heard, Google has delivered a big “screw you” to the Chinese government by refusing to censor their search results. It appears that some citizens are already in mourning—even before the hammer comes down.

    [ziboy]







  • The 2-Billion-Eyed Intermedia

    Kevein Kelly is one of the people to answer this years Edge question, which asked “How has the internet changed the way you think?” – The 2-Billion-Eyed Intermedia. He actually wrote a response, as opposed to just searching Google and linking to something that sounded cool…

    To a first approximation the Internet is words on a screen — Google, papers, blogs. But this first glance ignores the vastly larger underbelly of the Internet — moving images on a screen. People (and not just young kids) no longer go to books and text first. If people have a question they (myself included) head first for YouTube. For fun we go to online massive games, or catch streaming movies, including factual videos (documentaries are in a renaissance). New visual media are stampeding onto the Nets. This is where the Internet’s center of attention lies, not in text alone. Because of online fans, and streaming on demand, and rewinding at will, and all the other liquid abilities of the Internet, directors started creating movies that were more than 100 hours long.

    These vast epics like Lost and The Wire had multiple interweaving plot lines, multiple protagonists, an incredible depth of characters and demanded sustained attention that was not only beyond previous TV and 90-minute movies, but would have shocked Dickens and other novelists of yore. They would marvel: “You mean they could follow all that, and then want more? Over how many years?” I would never have believed myself capable of enjoying such complicated stories, or caring about them to put in the time. My attention has grown. In a similar way the depth, complexity and demands of games can equal these marathon movies, or any great book.

    But the most important way the Internet has changed the direction of my attention, and thus my thinking, is that it has become one thing. It may look like I am spending endless nano-seconds on a series of tweets, and endless microseconds surfing between Web pages, or wandering between channels, and hovering only mere minutes on one book snippet after another; but in reality I am spending 10 hours a day paying attention to the Internet. I return to it after a few minutes, day after day, with essentially my full-time attention. As do you.

    We are developing an intense, sustained conversation with this large thing. The fact that it is made up of a million loosely connected pieces is distracting us. The producers of Websites, and the hordes of commenters online, and the movie moguls reluctantly letting us stream their movies, don’t believe they are mere pixels in a big global show, but they are. It is one thing now, an intermedia with 2 billion screens peering into it. The whole ball of connections — including all its books, all its pages, all its tweets, all its movies, all its games, all its posts, all its streams — is like one vast global book (or movie, etc.), and we are only beginning to learn how to read it.

    Knowing that this large thing is there, and that I am in constant communication with it, has changed how I think.


  • Google attacked and likely to exit China

    Here is an excerpt from an entry posted by David Drummond, Google Chief Legal Officer on Google’s official blog (emphasis added),

    First, this attack was not just on Google. As part of our investigation we have discovered that at least twenty other large companies from a wide range of businesses–including the Internet, finance, technology, media and chemical sectors–have been similarly targeted. We are currently in the process of notifying those companies, and we are also working with the relevant U.S. authorities.

    Second, we have evidence to suggest that a primary goal of the attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists. Based on our investigation to date we believe their attack did not achieve that objective. Only two Gmail accounts appear to have been accessed, and that activity was limited to account information (such as the date the account was created) and subject line, rather than the content of emails themselves.

    Third, as part of this investigation but independent of the attack on Google, we have discovered that the accounts of dozens of U.S.-, China- and Europe-based Gmail users who are advocates of human rights in China appear to have been routinely accessed by third parties. These accounts have not been accessed through any security breach at Google, but most likely via phishing scams or malware placed on the users’ computers.

    […] We launched Google.cn in January 2006 in the belief that the benefits of increased access to information for people in China and a more open Internet outweighed our discomfort in agreeing to censor some results. At the time we made clear that “we will carefully monitor conditions in China, including new laws and other restrictions on our services. If we determine that we are unable to achieve the objectives outlined we will not hesitate to reconsider our approach to China.

    These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered–combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web–have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China. We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. [*****] We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China. [*****]

    The decision to review our business operations in China has been incredibly hard, and we know that it will have potentially far-reaching consequences. We want to make clear that this move was driven by our executives in the United States, without the knowledge or involvement of our employees in China [k-note: I read this as a message to Chinese government, don’t blame the Chinese employees] who have worked incredibly hard to make Google.cn the success it is today. We are committed to working responsibly to resolve the very difficult issues raised.

    An excerpt from WSJ “Google Warns of China Exit” (emphasis added),

    For Google to withdraw from China would be an extremely rare repudiation by a Western company of what is almost universally seen in business circles as one of the world’s most important markets. The country has 338 million Internet users as of June, more than any other country. Even the public suggestion that it is considering such a move is likely to infuriate Chinese authorities. Google’s statement could complicate matters for other tech companies sensitive to being seen as [****] accomplices of the Chinese government. [****]

    More reports in UK Guardian “Google sends a shockwave through Chinese internet”, TIME “Google Ends Policy of Self-Censorship in China”Wired, CNet, ZDnet, Reuters “Chinese Internet activists applaud Google, see no backdown”, UK Guardian “Google strikes a blow to China’s Great Firewall”.

    Congrats to Google for regaining its backbone in China! And I also agree with ZDnet in saying “Bravo! Google takes a stand for human rights in China”.

    Posted in China, Chinese, Democracy, ethics, Google, Internet, Law, people, politics, World, World Affairs

  • DataSphere and Halosource Get Funded, Sage Signs Up Pfizer, Zymo Raises $90M, & More Seattle-Area Deals News

    Gregory T. Huang wrote:

    2010 is off to a pretty fast start in terms of Northwest deals. We’ve already seen a lot of action in biotech, software, and cleantech.

    —Seattle-based InstantService, a provider of live chat services, was acquired by Art Technology Group (NASDAQ: ARTG) of Cambridge, MA, an e-commerce software firm, for $17 million in cash, as Wade reported. InstantService’s technology will be used to help ATG’s clients offer live text-based chat with customer service agents on e-commerce sites.

    —San Diego and Seattle-based VentiRx Pharmaceuticals raised $25 million in new funding, as Luke reported. The financing, which is an extension of a $26.6 million Series A deal from 2007, was led by new investor MedImmune Ventures, while existing investors Arch Venture Partners, Frazier Healthcare Ventures, and Domain Associates also participated. VentiRx is developing drugs to boost the body’s innate immune system to fight cancer and allergies.

    Sage Bionetworks, the Seattle-based nonprofit that’s leading a movement toward open-source sharing of biological data, has formed a partnership with Pfizer (NYSE: PFE), as Luke reported. Financial details and other terms weren’t disclosed, but the deal will provide enough cash for Sage to hire some new staff and will help support the nonprofit’s goal of building computational models in “network biology.”

    —Seattle-based ZymoGenetics made $90.9 million in a stock sale after discounts and expenses. The company’s investors and underwriters bought 16.1 million shares at $6 apiece. The money will be used for R&D and to help ZymoGenetics (NASDAQ: ZGEN) market its drug for combating surgical bleeding.

    Kineta, a Seattle biotech company developing treatments for viral infections and autoimmune diseases, raised $942,000 in equity, debt, and options from 25 investors, as Luke reported.

    —Bothell, WA-based Halosource, a maker of water purification technology, raised $10 million in a Series D financing led by Prime Partners Asia Merchant Capital of Singapore, as Luke reported. Halosource’s investors include Credit Suisse, Siemens, the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, and in Seattle, Alexander Hutton Venture Partners, Buerk Dale Victor (now Montlake Capital), and WRF Capital. The new money will be used to fuel Halosource’s expansion to more developing countries.

    —Kirkland, WA-based OVP Venture Partners led a $9 million investment in Aggregate Knowledge, a San Mateo, CA-based online advertising and analytics firm. Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers, DAG Ventures, and the company’s original angel investors also participated in the deal. The Seattle connection between Aggregate Knowledge and OVP was David Jakubowski, a former Microsoftie and advertising technology expert who is now AK’s chief revenue officer.

    —Bellevue, WA-based DataSphere raised $10.8 million in Series B funding from Ignition Partners and two other strategic investors. DataSphere works with media companies to power hyperlocal websites and local advertising on those sites. I spoke with CEO Satbir Khanuja about his company’s strategy and prospects.

    —Seattle cleantech software firm Verdiem raised $4.7 million in equity financing, according to a regulatory filing, as Luke reported. The investors were not disclosed. Verdiem’s software for personal computers is meant to help big companies and other organizations cut their electricity consumption.

    —Seattle-based RealNetworks acquired Varia Mobile, also in Seattle, for an undisclosed amount. Varia, which makes content distribution and publishing software for mobile phones, was founded in 2007 and had a strategic alliance with RealNetworks (NASDAQ: RNWK) prior to the acquisition.







  • Is Sprint Putting a WiMax Tower On Every Walmart? [WiMax]

    This seems pretty out-there, but an Android Guys tipster reports that Sprint and Walmart are working together to build Sprint’s WiMax network. Sprint’s been rolling out 4G slowly but surely, but this partnership would mean especially thorough coverage. [Android Guys]







  • Google Docs to Allow Storage of Any File Type

    Google is opening up its Docs hosted office productivity suite so that users can store any type of file in it, giving the popular software-as-a-service product an important online storage component.

    The functionality will be rolled out over the coming weeks to all Docs users, both the ones who use the stand-alone suite as well as those who use it as part of the broader communication and collaboration Apps suite for organizations.

    Now, Docs users will be able to store all their important files in a single place online, where they can access them from anywhere and share them with other people, according to Google.

    “This is a natural extension and progression of what we’ve been doing with Google Docs,” said Vijay Bangaru, Google Docs product manager.

    One thing it’s not, according to Bangaru, is the G-drive, the often-rumored cloud storage service from Google that has yet to see the light of day. “On the consumer side, this isn’t a virtual drive. There isn’t a client that’s going to help you sync terabytes to the cloud,” he said.

    Google did work with some partners that built applications that take advantage of this new functionality via a Docs API (application programming interface). Those external applications were built specifically for users of the Premier version of Apps, which is the most sophisticated and the only one that is fee-based, priced at US$50 per user, per year. Companies that use Apps Premier will also be able to build their own applications in-house using the API.

    Just because users will be able to store any type of file on Google Docs doesn’t mean, however, that they will necessarily be able to work on those files on the Docs cloud, as is possible in the suite today with Adobe PDF files, Microsoft Office files and, of course, the native Docs file formats.

    “Unfortunately, it’s not possible to write Web editors for every file content out there,” he said. In those cases, users will be able to access the files online and share them with others, but in order to work on them, they’ll have to download them to their PCs and fire up the necessary application.

    Along with the new capabilities, Google is lifting the ceiling on file sizes to 250MB. Users of the stand-alone Docs suite will have 1GB of free storage for files stored in their native formats, as opposed to converted to a native Docs format. They’ll be able to buy additional storage for $0.25 per gigabyte per year. Google Apps users will also get 1GB of storage, and will have the ability to buy additional storage for $3.50 per gigabyte per year.

    While Docs currently doesn’t have one-click buttons to post or publish files to third-party sites and services like Facebook, Google isn’t closing the door on adding that functionality and more.

    “The idea behind this feature is that it’s really an opportunity for Google to invest in cloud storage and provide value added services to its users around sharing files, uploading files and being able to collaborate and search on all of that content,” said Anil Sabharwal, Google Docs product manager. “There’s a great opportunity for us to provide value-added services on top of any of those file types.”

    Courtesy of PC World

  • ATG Acquires InstantService

    Wade Roush wrote:

    Art Technology Group (NASDAQ: ARTG), the Cambridge, MA-based provider of e-commerce software and services, announced today that it has acquired Seattle-based InstantService, which offers SaaS-based live chat services, for $17 million in cash. ATG said the acquisition will make it easier for its clients to offer live text-based chat with customer service agents as an option for e-commerce site visitors.







  • Melodeo, Making Big Push in Online Music, Eyes Apple in the Cloud

    nuTsie
    Gregory T. Huang wrote:

    OK, so you’re a small, profitable tech company in the digital media sector. Your closest competitor just got acquired by Apple. Now Steve Jobs is encroaching on your territory. How do you want to play it?

    That’s the situation Seattle-based Melodeo faces after Apple paid a reported $85 million last month to buy online music startup Lala, based in Palo Alto, CA. It looks like Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) is making a play to own the streaming music market, breaking with its traditional approach of selling music downloads via iTunes. The implications pose a challenge for nuTsie, Melodeo’s flagship streaming music service that lets iTunes users play their songs on their (non-iPhone) mobile phones and netbooks.

    After the story emerged that there had been a bidding war for Lala, reportedly between Apple and Google (and probably others), rumors of acquisition talks involving Melodeo also have surfaced. Reached by phone, Dave Dederer, Melodeo’s vice president of business development, declined to comment specifically on any talks. “Like any small, venture-backed company, at some point we need a bigger partner to bring our efforts to their greatest possible fruition,” he says. “The Lala acquisition has accelerated conversations we’ve been having. A lot of people have been courting us over the last few weeks.”

    In the meantime, Melodeo is raising the bar on its products. Last week, it released an application that analyzes the iTunes playlists on your iPhone or iPod Touch and automatically creates new playlists that it streams to you over the Web. The new app is called “Effin Genius,” a play on the “Genius” song-recommendation feature of iTunes. (It’s kind of awesome.) Effin Genius has gotten some rave reviews; CNET called it “Pandora’s smart little brother.” And Melodeo is building buzz around a new product to be announced soon—as early as this week—which is supposed to give any smartphone or Web-connected device the capabilities of an iPod, only better.

    It’s all part of the company’s efforts to march to the beat of its own drum in online music. For now, the math is simple: there are about 400 million iTunes customers (Apple has roughly 75 percent market share of digital songs), but only 100 million-plus iPhone and iPod users. …Next Page »







  • The internet to will go green if all goes as planned for Bell Labs

    green-computer.jpg
    In an effort to have the Internet go green, the Bell Labs has announced its refurbishment and that of other communication networks. This will help make the Internet 1000 times more energy efficient and clean. Around 300 million tons of green house gases are given out every year due to the use of these communication networks. The “Green Touch” association if successful in changing the mindset of these companies to suitably change their use of technology, the Internet will be more energy efficient, using the same amount of energy in three years that is currently used in a day! Sounds amazing right? Well to make this dream come true, the Green Touch association that includes communication giants like AT&T, China Mobile, Samsung etc will need to come up with a few more innovations and funds. The last time such an effort was put forward, 90% of the phone features we use today were invented and implemented. This will also help reduce the carbon footprint reducing greenhouse gas emission. So let’s hope that this plan works out, changing the way we communicate in future.

    [SolveClimate]