Category: News

  • Dilbert prods at the lost iPhone 4G prototype

    Scott Adams, everybody. If he’s not one of your heros, you probably just need to read up on him a bit more.

    Adams wanted Dilbert to touch in on the lost iPhone prototype — but unfortunately, there wasn’t an open slot in his publishing queue until June 18th. Rather than pushing the comic out many weeks after it’d be relevant, Adams decided to push not one, but two comic drafts straight to his fans via his personal blog.

    Neither of the comics will ever reach the newspapers. Be sure to check out the second (equally great) comic on Adams’ site.


  • FedEx installs America’s largest roof-top solar installation

    fedexsolar.jpg
    FedEx Ground, a unit of FedEx that ships small packages has collaborated with BP Solar to build a huge rooftop solar power generation unit. This project is situated in Woodbridge, New Jersey, at the company’s distribution hub. This power plant is supposed to be the nation’s largest solar rooftop installation. It consists of 12,400 solar panels spread over approximately 3.3 acres of roof-space. With the ability to generate 2.42 megawatts of power, this installation is estimated to satisfy about 30% of the total energy requirements of the entire facility.

    According to the terms of the collaboration, BP Solar would install and operate the plant and FedEx would buy the energy generated from it. FedEx sets an excellent example for other organizations to follow through this policy.
    [greenbiz]

  • Tito Ortiz Jenna Jameson Assault — Ortiz Arrested For Domestic Violence Against Former Porn Star

    The Fighting World has a Chris Brown Situation on its hands…..UFC star Tito Ortiz was arrested for felony domestic violence earlier Monday morning after attacking girlfriend Jenna James in the Huntington Beach, California home he shares the retired adult film star. Cops collared the beefy Ortiz after responding to a distress call to find Jenna with “visible injuries.”

    Tito — a former contestant on NBC’s The Celebrity Apprentice — is currently in custody and en route to a Huntington Beach jail.

    The troubled couple are the parents of one-year-old twin boys.


  • Rolls boss drives China strategy

    Rolls boss drives China strategy

    Ian Robertson, chairman of the legendary auto maker, says its cars have become symbols of achievement

    China’s market for luxury autos is unlike any in Europe or North America, says Ian Robertson, chairman of Rolls-Royce Motor Cars.

    There are complex regulatory challenges and different fashions but there is also a rapidly growing appetite for luxury goods, including high-end autos. And while sales of luxury cars still lag behind those in the West, the complex China market is of growing importance to the brands at the upper reaches of the industry, Mr. Robertson says.

    BMW AG, whose brands include Rolls-Royce, BMW and Mini, recorded sales in China of 90,563 vehicles last year, far fewer than the 241,727 vehicles sold in the U.S.

    “The American market is older and more established, with millions of drivers already in the premium segment and loyal to the brand,” says Mr. Robertson, who is also a member of the board of management at BMW responsible for group sales and marketing.

    But China became the world’s largest car market by sales in 2009 and the growth in China’s appetite for luxury autos is compelling. It represents a boon for an industry that has faced serious challenges in other markets during the global financial downturn.

    BMW’s sales in China jumped 37% last year, compared with a 25% to 30% decline in some markets. China is already the biggest market for BMW’s top-of-the-line 7-Series, by a factor of about two. Last year, the German auto maker said it will invest in a huge factory in Shenyang, China, expected to open in 2012, which will have an initial capacity of 100,000 cars a year.

    “In February we sold 96% more cars in China than during [February 2009.] It could have been more, but we ran out of cars,” says Mr. Robertson.

    BMW’s global rivals are well aware of the opportunities. Mercedes-Benz says its sales in China in February were up 160% compared with the same month in 2009. Volkswagen, owner of the Audi brand, reported a 61.7% jump in China sales for the period.

    Mr. Robertson discussed his thoughts on the Chinese luxury-car market with William Snyder in Geneva during the International Motor Show The following interview has been edited.

    WSJ: Why is China seeing such spectacular growth numbers while much of the world’s auto market tanked in 2009?

    Mr. Robertson: Chinese consumers never changed their spending habits, even when the global financial meltdown hit. Consumers had total faith that the government had fixed the problem. That’s why they kept buying cars.

    WSJ: What factors in China dictate your sales strategy?

    Mr. Robertson: There’s an automotive hierarchy in China unlike any in Europe and North America. The 5-Series is a car for midlevel managers and the 7-Series is for executives—and you won’t ever see that line crossed. This hierarchy comes from a market still developing the middle and upper classes.

    The 5- and 7- Series have become symbols of achieving “membership” in those demographics. We don’t see lines drawn like this in North America or Europe. It’s a lifestyle difference in these markets, whereas it’s a class difference in China.

    WSJ: How are you appealing to that hierarchy?

    Mr. Robertson: BMW has made design concessions to cater to the Chinese market. China is the only market that carries a 5-Series with a long wheelbase. [It was introduced in 2007.] The extended wheelbase creates a roomier backseat, making it comfortable enough to be an “arrival and departure car,” by which I mean a car with a chauffeur. We’re seeing more and more people wanting to drive themselves, but China is still a “driven-in” car market. We’re not just targeting the high-end buyer. I see segmentation increasing.

    WSJ: BMW’s premium and tailor-made brand, Rolls-Royce, is also gaining popularity in China, surpassing Japan as its largest market in Asia and making up just over 10% of global sales in 2009. How does the Rolls-Royce market in China compare to the U.S. or England?

    Mr. Robertson: Bespoke in the U.S. is more difficult because dealers believe they need on-lot stock. Americans don’t like to wait. It takes three to six months in China to deliver a Rolls-Royce and this has become a status symbol and selling point. The customers in China like to brag about how long it will take to build their cars.

    WSJ: What worries you about China?

    Mr. Robertson: We know where legislation will be in the U.S. over the next couple of years. But China may suddenly take huge regulatory steps to reduce carbon emissions or change safety regulations. We don’t have the legislative awareness like in other countries.

    The 2009 truck law [that defined a truck as being longer than 5.9 meters (19.5 feet) and meant the standard Rolls-Royce Phantom could not cruise China’s city streets at night] is a perfect example. It took three months of engineering to adjust the Phantom’s length.

    WSJ: Is China the main strategic focus for the BMW Group for the next few years?

    Mr. Robertson: I believe the premium market in the U.S. still has the most potential. American buyers tend to replace their cars in the premium category, a pattern that hasn’t had a chance to develop yet in the newer Chinese marketplace.

    Source article | Wall Street Journal by William Snyder

  • GameStop Made Me Buy Cables So They Could Test My Xbox Trade In

    Jason went into GameStop to trade in his Xbox 360, and experienced something odd. He says they refused to take his trade-in unless he bought new non-HD cables so they could test the system with the non-HD TVs they had in the store.

    Here’s the email Jason sent to us and to GameStop:

    I am writing you regarding a concern that I have about the business practices of one of your stores.

    I recently visited [redacted] on Saturday, April 24th; with the intent of trading in my Xbox 360 and several accompanying games and peripherals.

    I was able to trade in my games and peripherals with no issue, although I hit a snag upon trying to trade in my Xbox 360. The cables that I traded in with the unit were HD composite cables, and I was informed that I would not be able to trade the system in unless I had the standard definition cables.

    It seems that the only televisions that this GameStop has are standard definition 13” color CRTs, therefore there is no way they could plug in my HD cables and ensure that the system was in good working order.

    The female employee suggested that I could buy a set of standard cables, and then trade them in with the system. I found that I had little choice but to do so. I purchased the cables.

    The female employee then took my HD cables as a trade-in. This is the point that I really want to stress. She took my HD cables. Why? It was already made clear to me that they had no way of telling if the cables worked. Does GameStop make it policy to take in items without any knowledge of the item’s ability to work, and if so, why weren’t the cables accepted in the first place?

    Does GameStop really need the extra $14 I had to pay in order to trade in my system? Did the employee feel that my trade-in value was too high and thought it best to try to shave a few dollars off by making me buy unnecessary cables? Did she need to fill some POP requirement that requires her to sell accessories with every purchase?

    Why doesn’t the company keep an extra set of cables lying around for just this occasion? It’s obvious that GameStop will accept HD cables as a separate trade-in, so why not have a set of cables to test out systems that have HD components?

    Also, why doesn’t GameStop have the ability to test out HD systems? Doesn’t GameStop sell HD systems? How do they test a PS3 when it gets traded in? The company does business in selling HD systems, you would think that GameStop would have the ability to capitalize off that fact and be equipped with the ability to test said systems.

    I know there were other options for me in selling my Xbox 360. I know I could have used Craigslist or eBay and have made more from my sale, but I wanted to sell the system quickly, so I chose GameStop over Vintage Stock and GameCo. I now have credit with GameStop, and I will use that credit, but when that is used up and after what I experienced I do not know if I will continue to spend my money at GameStop.

    There are several aspects of this story that seem weird to us, so we’re just going to throw it out there and see what you guys make of it.

    Does this sound right to all of you? What should Jason have done differently? Is there a better way to unload an Xbox quickly? Why doesn’t GameStop have cables for testing things? Or do they?

  • Avatar Blu-ray Breaks Sales Records By Doubling Them [Movies]

    Avatar! It’s basically a big, blue, 3D money-printing machine. The previous record for Blu-ray sales was held by The Dark Knight, but Avatar has come along and doubled it. More »







  • 5 Reasons Investors Are Pushing Goldman To New Post-Lawsuit Lows (GS)

    chart

    The general market has pulled back (though the Dow remains positive courtesy of Caterpillar’s strong performance in Asia).

    Highlighting the squishy action is Goldman Sachs, which is now down 3%, near lows of the day, and new post-lawsuit lows.

    Perhaps investors are wonder what, possibly, could propel the stock higher.

    Here are some reasons to sell.

    • There isn’t likely to be a favorable resolution to the lawsuit anytime soon.
    • Nobody knows how tomorrow’s big hearings are going to go. It could be ugly if politicians get nasty.
    • Earnings are over, so that’s all priced in
    • and the interest rate environment can’t possibly get better.
    • Oh, and there’s this big bill being debated as we speak, and at looks like, quite possibly, derivative reform will be real.

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • Will the First MBS in 2 Years Jumpstart the Market?

    Mortgage-backed securities are back! Sort of. Bloomberg reports that Citigroup is offering the first non-government backed private label MBS deal in over two years. This is a market that has been largely expected to remain frozen for some time. Is it beginning to thaw? Not exactly.

    Calculated Risk has a great brief analysis of why Citi’s Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2010-H1 isn’t just any old MBS deal. It says the collateral is about as safe an MBS as an investor could possibly dream up. Here are some of the characteristics of the deal that show why this MBS will actually sell:

    • The weighted FICO score is 768. This means the borrowers have pristine credit histories.
    • The average loan-to-value ratio is 56%. This means, even if the mortgages have a whopping 44% loss rate, no investor will lose a penny of principal. (AAA investors have an additional 6.5% of cushion.)
    • These are very rich borrowers. The average loan balance is $932,699. And despite their lofty mortgages, the average borrower’s debt-to-income ratio is only 27%.
    • All but two of the 255 borrowers have income of at least $10,000 per month. 22 earn more than $100,000 per month.
    • All but 16 of the borrowers have assets worth over $100,000. 76 own assets worth more than $1.05 million.
    • Income and assets were verified for 100% of the borrowers.
    • All but eight of the homes are primary residences.

    This deal is very small at $222 million. Most MBS transactions during the boom were in the billions of dollars. It’s not likely that many squeaky-clean deals like this one can be originated at this time. So for the MBS market to really open back up, lower quality mortgages will have to be included. That, however, will likely continue to frighten investors in the near-term. So while this Citi deal is an important first step, it doesn’t indicate that there’s a lot more private-label MBS to come to market soon.





    Email this Article
    Add to digg
    Add to Reddit
    Add to Twitter
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to StumbleUpon
    Add to Facebook



  • HTC Droid Incredible reviews, contest; Nexus One on Verizon; Sprint Evo 4G

     

    From the Forums is a great way for you, our readers, to see the hottest topics being discussed. But you must be a registered member and becoming a member is a simple process. So if you have not already already done so, head on over and register now!

    See you in the forums!

  • Volunteering this Summer?

    Do your summer plans include more than just soaking up some sun or sleeping till noon? Do you plan to take part in a volunteer project or other community service? “Volunteers Rock the World!” — part of the Ready for the World Initiative — is looking for members of the UT Knoxville family who are lending a hand at home or in communities around the globe. If your summer plans include volunteer work, and you’re willing to share your story, please contact Amy Blakely at [email protected].

    Do your summer plans include more than just soaking up some sun or sleeping till noon? Do you plan to take part in a volunteer project or other community service? “Volunteers Rock the World!” — part of the Ready for the World Initiative — is looking for members of the UT Knoxville family who are lending a hand at home or in communities around the globe. If your summer plans include volunteer work, and you’re willing to share your story, please contact Amy Blakely at [email protected].

  • The Aardvark Theory of Product: Fake It Till You Make It

    Aardvark, by some measures — accumulating many active users or making lots of money, for example — did not succeed. But hey, it did get acquired by Google for a cool $50 million, so it’s worth hearing a little more about how the social search startup succeeded on that front. The real secret, according to Aardvark co-founders Max Ventilla and Damon Horowitz, who were speaking at the Startup Lessons Learned conference in San Francisco on Friday, was acute awareness of how close they were to failure.

    Aardvark co-founders Max Ventilla and Damon Horowitz

    “I’m probably going to fail, so how can I increase my chances of success but — more importantly — use that failure and make it less painful and minimize the risk of the catastrophic fail, when you’ve run out of money and you actually have to change jobs,” was how Ventilla described their thought process.

    “Once you’ve sold your startup, it feels very much fated. I don’t think we felt that,” Ventilla said. That’s despite the fact that he had formerly worked at Google and Horowitz had founded multiple acquired startups. But the truth is that the Aardvark founders had no idea what their product would be or if they’d be able to build it.

    Aardvark's abandoned product ideas

    In order to find out, they got users to test-drive their ideas. For the first six months Aardvark prototyped ideas, gave them to 100-200 people, and if they saw they weren’t taking off, abandoned them (a slide of five abandoned ideas is pictured on the left). Once they figured out that social Q&A was the ticket, they didn’t pull back on user testing, bringing in 6-12 users a week over the 30-month span of the startup.

    But Aardvark didn’t actually build products right away. The service connects people with questions to those in their broader social network with corresponding answers, but for nine months, a human being was involved in every single interaction — a kind of “Wizard of Oz” that classified the query and otherwise managed the conversation from behind the scenes.

    In the meantime, Aardvark recruited its core team and raised $7.5 million. In fact, Ventilla said was easier to convince investors and prospective employees that Aardvark could figure out how to automate something that people were already using than to get people to use something new.

    Aardvark's long path to product automation

    Once Aardvark felt it was on the right track, its next goal was to improve its ability to learn and engineer faster, said Ventilla. The entire company — 30 people at the time of acquisition — reviewed user testing, feedback and metrics, and split testing for new features on a weekly basis. “As long as you don’t run out of money, if your second derivative is good you’ll leave everyone else in the dust,” he argued. Aardvark also made sure that users and advisers alike knew their opinions were being heard and implemented. “Part of your job as an entrepreneur is to be barraged by opposing viewpoints,” said Horowitz. “If you’re not prepared to be grateful, than you shouldn’t do a startup.”

    “This is a sinking ship from day one, and that’s why we’re going to do lots of things and be totally uncompromising about when we abandon one ship and try to get on another leaky boat,” said Ventilla of the startup experience. Or as Horowitz put it, “Assume you are wrong, and then at least you’ll be correct in that assumption, if nothing else.”

    A video of the talk is embedded below:


    Watch live video from Startup Lessons Learned on Justin.tv

    Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Google’s Social Scheme Hinges on Fears, Not Fortunes

  • Video: Fifth Gear reviews the Honda CR-Z… or CR-Zed

    2011 Honda CR-Z Review by Fifth Gear

    The folks at Fifth Gear are back and today they give us their take on the new 2011 Honda CR-Z hybrid hatchback. Check out their review of Honda’s latest hybrid model.

    Click here to get prices on the 2010 Honda Insight Hybrid.

    Click here for more news on the Honda CR-Z.

    Refresher: The 2011 Honda CR-Z is powered by a 1.5L i-VTEC mated to Honda’s Integrated Motor Assist hybrid system. It produces a total of 122-hp and a maximum torque of 128 lb-ft when mated to manual transmission (123 lb-ft for CVT models). Fuel-economy is estimated at 31/37 mpg (city/highway) for the manual model and 36/38 mpg for the CVT model. Sales begin in the second half of 2010.

    2011 Honda CR-Z:

    2011 Honda CR-Z:

    – By: Kap Shah


  • The $40 Billion Opportunity In Iraq (SLB, BHI, WFT, HAL, SII, BP, FWLT, XOM)

    AP Iraq Oil

    Iraq represents a significant opportunity for the oil services industry. We believe the success of the recent Iraqi oil auctions has created a multi-billion dollar opportunity for major oil services firms such as  Schlumberger (SLB),  Baker Hughes (BHI),  Weatherford (WFT), and  Halliburton (HAL). The winning oil and gas companies have committed to boosting production capacity in Iraq to around 12 million barrels per day in six to seven years, from just 2.5 million barrels per day today. If this goal is achieved, it would mark one of the greatest capacity increases in the industry’s history.

    We have our doubts that Iraq can reach this level of production by 2016.  At this time, we do not have enough data to make an informed estimate of achievable production levels in such a short time frame. However, if we assume that Iraq oil production reaches 8 million barrels per day by 2016, which reflects 75% of the committed targets, we expect there could be up to $40 billion in services contracts available from 2010 to 2016 for the industry’s drilling and services expertise.

    Even if one third to one half of the awards go to local Iraqi firms for nationalistic reasons, we believe all four major services firms will benefit from this unprecedented opportunity. Currently, Weatherford has the early lead in the region, with several rigs drilling under contract. The company also shared along with Schlumberger in  BP’s (BP) $500 million award for services work in Iraq’s Rumaila field. The other major services firms are behind for now, but rapidly building out their infrastructure, and hiring workers in the country. We expect that Iraq-related revenue for each of the major players could cross $1 billion annually by 2013. We think Schlumberger will regain its traditional position as the industry leader, thanks to its experience and comprehensive product portfolio. The merger with  Smith (SII) could strengthen Schlumberger’s position in the region, provided that there are no integration or divestiture issues.

    Iraq’s Oil Production May Explode
    The history of oil production in Iraq has been challenging. Iraqi oil production topped 3 million barrels per day in 1979. Saddam Hussein’s subsequent rise to power led to decades of rocky production and overall industry stagnation. Iraq’s current oil production, around 2.5 million barrels per day with reserves of about 115 billion barrels, is the third-largest amount of proven reserves after Saudi Arabia and Iran. Industry estimates suggest that Iraq could contain over 200 billion barrels in reserves, and potentially as much as 400 billion barrels. Despite these massive hydrocarbon riches, the oil industry was at one time once convinced that persistent war and civil unrest would permanently deny it access to Iraq’s sprawling oil and gas fields.

    morningstar iraq oil
    morningstar iraq oil

    However, this all changed in the middle of 2009. At that time, the Iraqi government offered technical services contracts to develop some of Iraq’s largest fields to international and national oil companies. The first auction was widely viewed as a failure, as the majority of the fields offered failed to obtain bids. This was largely due to the onerous bidding terms set by the Iraqi government. Only one consortium, BP/CNPC, successfully bid for the Rumaila field, although several other deals were completed later under revised terms. The second auction, held in November 2009, was a stunning success. Numerous industry consortiums bid successfully for contracts which, when added together, suggest that Iraq’s oil production capacity could reach 12 million barrels per day in six to seven years. Actual oil output will be based on market demand, and there is language in the contracts to compensate the oil and gas companies if oil production is reduced. A significant near-term hurdle is the passage of a comprehensive oil law that justifies the legal framework for the auctions.

    Infrastructure Issues Loom Large
    Infrastructure challenges present one of the biggest short-term constraints. Iraq produces 2.5 million barrels per day, and exports 1.9 million barrels per day. The country has indicated that it is working on a new plan to build pipelines and export terminals. The amount of cash being spent on the issue is immense, as Iraq is expected to receive about $200 billion annually from the development contracts, and the oil and gas companies have indicated plans to spend about $100 billion developing the fields. Two floating oil terminals are already under construction, and the country plans to build two more, bringing its oil handling capabilities to about 3.6 million barrels per day.  Foster Wheeler (FWLT) has been awarded a contract to assist with the engineering for some new oil export facilities which would bring Iraq’s exporting capabilities to 4.5 million barrels per day. Water constraints are also being addressed, with  ExxonMobil (XOM)  and Iraq working on plans to use seawater for pumping operations.

    Though infrastructure is a challenge, we believe that the initial wells will not be technically difficult. Oil and gas companies indicated that they plan to target easy-to-drill wells to boost the fields’ initial production rates by 10%, which will trigger the cost-recovery portion of the contracts. After the first year, the drilling will graduate to more technically challenging wells. Therefore, we expect that the services firms will be able to generate above-average margins drilling easy wells for the first year, and Iraq oil production should move towards 2.6 million barrels per day by the end of 2010.

    Schlumberger and Weatherford Are Early Leaders
    The scale and success of the production increases in Iraq are uncertain. However, we think the winners are easier to identify. The Western oil services companies such as Schlumberger, Halliburton, Baker Hughes, and Weatherford will all play key roles in Iraq’s oil production plans. The firms are valuable because they bring needed services expertise and numerous Western services technologies that will help the country fully exploit its long-neglected reserve base. The short timeline of the production ramp-up suggests that the industry should generate healthy operating margins in the 15% to 20% range.

    If we assume that Iraq oil production reaches 8 million barrels per day, we think Iraq-related services revenue will start to ramp up in 2011, and cross $1 billion in revenue for each of the major services firms in 2013. By 2016, we estimate potential annual revenue will top $3 billion per firm. At that time, we assume over 400 rigs will be working, and the number of wells drilled will run between 1,500 and 2,000 annually. We believe about $40 billion in services contracts will be awarded to Western and Iraqi oil services firms over the next six to seven years for the necessary drilling and needed services expertise to develop the core Iraq oil fields. In 2016, we’re forecasting a potential annual market size between $18 billion and $20 billion. For comparison, we estimate the global oil services market was worth about $83 billion at the end of 2008.

    In this case, we think Iraq poses the greatest opportunity for Weatherford, especially given its status as the smallest of the four major services firms. The firm has won a number of early contracts in the region over the past few years, while its competitors are still trying to build out their presence in the country. However, we expect the capital investment required in Iraq will be extensive, and Weatherford’s constant reliance on the markets for cash may prevent it from taking full advantage of its Iraq opportunities. The need for additional capital could make a merger with industry peer Halliburton, which has very healthy balance sheet, a strong possibility in 2011 or 2012.

    The impact of Iraq on industry leader Schlumberger will be diluted, thanks to its wide-ranging international operations. The reduced contribution is despite the fact that we believe Schlumberger is positioned to earn above-average market share some of the industry’s highest margins, thanks to its wide-ranging portfolio of services. However, our estimates could be revised higher after the merger with Smith is completed, if Schlumberger can successfully establish more of its product lines in the region. We also think the company has best-in-class experience at executing integrated-project-management (IPM) contracts. In our view, the IPM contract framework is the most likely way Iraq will choose to hand out the services contracts. The difficult operating environment could make quarterly profitability lumpy for the services firms, as we believe the contract framework depends on a stable drilling environment to earn the greatest profits.

    If Iraqi oil production turns out to be around 5 million barrels per day in 2016, we assume a much-reduced level of Iraqi services expenditures. We estimate the annual market size would be about $10 billion in 2016, and it would take about $20 billion in services contracts from 2010 to 2016 to drill the needed wells in the auctioned-off fields. We assume it will take until 2015 for Iraqi revenue to cross $1 billion for each of the major services firms. The number of wells drilled annually will only be between 800 and 1,000, and about 200 rigs will be operating in the country. Understandably, the opportunities and profits for Weatherford, Schlumberger, and others will be greatly reduced from an 8 million barrel-a-day production scenario.

    If everything goes very well for Iraq and the services firms, production could reach 11 million barrels per day in 2016. In this case, infrastructure, security, and political concerns are all mostly resolved, and the country becomes quite stable. The annual market size could approach $30 billion in 2016, and services contract awards could total $60 billion from 2010 to 2016 in this optimistic case. We believe Iraqi-related revenue for each of the major services firms could cross $1 billion annually in 2012. We expect over 600 rigs to be operating in the country by 2016, and the number of annual wells drilled to be between 2,500 and 3,000. This scenario would be an extremely positive one for the services firms, and the industry would benefit from sharply higher revenue and profits.

    Overall, we think it is clear that there are large opportunities for the services industry in Iraq, but the country must overcome numerous hurdles for the industry to obtain any measure of success. If Iraq manages to add just 3 million barrels a day to its production during the next decade, the achievement would still rank among the industry’s greatest accomplishments. Thus, adding 10 million barrels a day in production is a huge undertaking. Still, if Iraq can come close to realizing its potential, we think the services industry is extremely well-positioned to earn considerable profits.

    Don’t miss: 10 Oil Powers Of The Distant Future

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • Brooke Shields Upset With Reports that Global Warming Doesn’t Exist by Hollie McKay, FoxNews.com

    Article Tags: Film & TV

    The actress says she is concerned with the growing skepticism surrounding global warming.

    The subject of global warming has become a hotly debated topic over recent years, with many questioning whether it is an issue worthy of serious concern or whether it’s simply a marketing term concocted by “green” companies to boost their profile and revenue.

    But one person who is concerned about the skepticism against global warming is Hollywood actress, Brooke Shields.

    “It all upsets me because I feel like we keep losing sight of simpler, smaller things,” Shields told Pop Tarts. “I don’t know what is true or not, I only know what I can do on a daily basis because I believe in it. Whether I am turning the water off in between brushing my teeth, which my little daughter is the police of, or I am recycling, or switching my products or using an energy saving washing machine…. I just have to do the best that I can do and keep doing more.”

    Shields stars alongside Brendan Fraser in the new family comedy “Furry Vengeance” which is centered around a real estate developer who has to go up against a clique of angry animals when his new housing subdivision encroaches on their habitat. Led by a raccoon, the woodland critters seek revenge to stop the construction and teach the developer about the environmental consequences of humankind invading nature.

    “There’s an eco message but it is not something that we’re preaching,” Shields explained. “We hope it spurs conversation with our kids about Mother Nature, the environment and the animals and how they can respect that.”

    Click source to read more, and……and….wow she is still very good looking.

    Source: foxnews.com

    Read in full with comments »   


  • Sirius XM radio coming to Android “soon”

    Hey, Android handset owners! Tired of your iPhone-toting friends bragging about how they can tune into SiriusXM radio on the go, while you can’t? Me too. (Don’t have any friends who happen to have both SiriusXM accounts and an iPhone? Me neither. We’re pretending, okay?)

    Fret no longer! Your time in the shadows of inadequacy is nearing its end, friend: SiriusXM is officially coming to Android.

    While Sirius isn’t giving any specific dates, a sign-up page that went live recently promises that it will be “available soon”. The application itself will be free, though you’ll need a monthly SiriusXM subscription to keep the tunes pumping after your 7-day trial is up.

    And before you Stern fans get too excited about listening to ol’ Curly on the go: just like with the iPhone app, Howard Stern (along with MLB Play-by-Play, NFL Play-by-Play, and SIRIUS NASCAR Radio) won’t be making an appearance here due to “contractual rights things“.


  • Indonesia harnessing volcano power

    volacno

    Indonesia’s 17,000 islands are home to hundreds of volcanoes and approximately 40 percent of the earth’s geothermal energy potential and the nation’s government is ready to harness that hot, clean energy.

    The country has set a goal of bringing online 4GW of geothermal capacity by 2014, which will almost quadruple the current capacity of 1,189 MW.  If you think that sounds ambitious, you’re right.  It generally takes three to five years just to complete field exploration and then another three years to actually build a geothermal plant.

    And then there’s the cost of the project — $12 billion to be exact. The country is looking to the World Bank, private investors and developed countries like Japan and the U.S. for help raising the money.  But once the plants are up and running, they’re basically tapping into endless, clean energy with little overhead required.

    Plus, this plan will go a long way towards reaching the Indonesian president’s goals of cutting emissions to 26 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and adding 10GW of clean energy capacity by 2014.

    via AFP

  • Jesse James Without Wedding Ring Photo

    Jesse James was spotted out and about today sans his wedding band – check out all the latest details over @ PEOPLE.com!

    Is this really a surprise? He turned his back on the vows attached to that ring a long time ago.

    James, 40, checked into an Arizona treatment center for sex addiction as a tabloid-driven sex scandal linking the star to a litany of other women left his marriage to Oscar winner Sandra Bullock crumbling at his feet. Just last week Bullock, 45, emerged from obscurity and was photographed hiking in Northern California, also not wearing her wedding ring.


  • Guest Post: Malcolm MacIver on War with the Cylons | Cosmic Variance

    Malcolm MacIverWe’re very happy to have a guest post from Malcolm MacIver. See if you can keep this straight: Malcolm is a professor in the departments of Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering at Northwestern, with undergraduate degrees in philosophy and computer science, and a Ph.D. in neuroscience. He’s also one of the only people I know who has a doctorate but no high school diploma.

    With this varied background, Malcolm studies connections between biomechanics and neuroscience — how do brains and bodies interact? This unique expertise helped land him a gig as the science advisor on Caprica, the SyFy Channel’s prequel show to Battlestar Galactica. He also blogs at Northwestern’s Science and Society blog. It’s a pleasure to welcome him to Cosmic Variance, where he’ll tell us about robots, artificial intelligence, and war.

    ———————————————————

    It’s a pleasure to guest blog for CV and Sean Carroll, a friend of some years now. In my last posting back at Northwestern University’s Science and Society Blog, I introduced some issues at the intersection of robotics, artificial intelligence (AI), and morality. While I’ve long been interested in this nexus, the most immediate impetus for the posting was meeting Peter Singer, author of the excellent book ‘Wired for War’ about the rise of unmanned warfare, while simultaneously working for the TV show Caprica and a U.S. military research agency that funds some of the work in my laboratory on bio-inspired robotics. Caprica, for those who don’t know it, is a show about a time when humans invent sentient robotic warriors. Caprica is a prequel to Battlestar Galactica, and as we know from that show, these warriors rise up against humans and nearly drive them to extinction.

    a-centurian-cylon-in-battlestar-galactica--2Here, I’d like to push the idea that as interesting as the technical challenges in making sentient robots like those on Caprica are, an equally interesting area is the moral challenges of making such machines. But “interesting” is too dispassionate—I believe that we need to begin the conversation on these moral challenges. Roboticist Ron Arkin has been making this point for some time, and has written a book on how we may integrate ethical decision making into autonomous robots.

    Given that we are hardly at the threshold of building sentient robots, it may seem overly dramatic to characterize this as an urgent concern, but new developments in the way we wage war should make you think otherwise. I heard a telling sign of how things are changing when I recently tuned in to the live feed of the most popular radio station in Washington DC, WTOP. The station had commercial after commercial from iRobot (of Roomba fame), a leading builder of unmanned military robots, clearly targeting military listeners. These commercials reflect how the use of unmanned robots in the military has gone from close to zero in 2001 to over ten thousand now, with the pace of acquisition still accelerating. For more details on this, see Peter Singer’s ‘Wired for War’, or the March 23 2010 congressional hearing on The Rise of the Drones here.

    While we are all aware of these trends to some extent, it’s hardly become a significant issue of concern. We are comforted by the knowledge that the final kill decision is still made by a human. But is this comfort warranted? The importance of such a decision changes as the way in which war is conducted, and the highly processed information supporting the decision, becomes mediated by unmanned military robots. Some of these trends have been helpful to our security. For example, the drones have been effective against the Taliban and Al-Qaeda because they can do long-duration monitoring and attacks of sparsely distributed non-state actors. However, in a military context, unmanned robots are clearly the gateway technology to autonomous robots, where machines can eventually be in the position to make decisions that have moral weight.

    “But wait!” many will say, “Isn’t this the business-as-usual-robotics-and-AI-are-just-around-the-corner argument we’ve heard for decades?” Robotics and AI have long been criticized as promising more than they could deliver. Are there signs that this could be changing? While an enormous amount could be said about the reasons for the past difficulties of AI, it is clear that some of its past difficulties stem from having too narrow a conception of what constitutes intelligence, a topic I’ve touched on for the recent Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. This narrow conception revolved around what might loosely be described as cognitive processing or reasoning. Newer types of AI and robotics, such as embodied AI and probabilistic robotics, tries to integrate some of the aspects of what being more than a symbol processor involves: for example, sensing the outside world and dealing with the uncertainty in those signals in order to be highly responsive, and emotional processing. Advanced multi-sensory signal processing techniques such as Bayesian filtering were in fact integral to the success of Stanley, the autonomous robot that won DARPA’s Grand Challenge to drive without human intervention across a challenging desert course.

    As these prior technical problems are overcome, autonomous decision making will become more common. Eventually, this will raise moral challenges. One area of challenge will be how we should behave towards artifacts, be they virtual or robotic, which are endowed with such a level of AI that how we treat them becomes an issue. On the other side, how they treat us becomes a problem, most especially in military or police contexts. What happens when an autonomous or semi-autonomous war robot makes an error and kills an innocent? Do we place responsibility on the designers of the decision making systems, the military strategists who placed machines with known limitations into contexts they were not designed for, or some other entity?

    Both of these challenges are about morality and ethics. But it is not clear whether our current moral framework, which is a hodgepodge of religious values, moral philosophies, and secular humanist values, is up to responding to these challenges. It is for this reason that the future of AI and robotics will be as much a moral challenge as a technical challenge. But while we have many smart people working on the technical challenges, very few are working on the moral challenges.

    How do we meet the moral challenge? One possibility is to look toward science for guidance. In my next posting I’ll discuss some of the efforts in this direction, pushed most recently by a new activist form of atheism which holds that it is incorrect to think that we need religion to ground morality, and even dangerous. We can instead, they claim, look to the new sciences of happiness, empathy, and cooperation for guiding our value system.


  • GT BRASIL: Lamborghini Cimed vence com Chico Longo e Daniel Serra em Curitiba

    GT Brasil - Lamborghini
    A equipe Lamborghini Cimed conquistou neste domingo – 25 de abril – em Curitiba, Paraná, a 1ª vitória no GT Brasil. Chico Longo e Daniel Serra com a ‘Lambo’ numeral 19 largou na 6ª colocação e depois de muita disputa cruzaram a linha de chegada em primeiro com mais de 11s de vantagem para uma outra Lamborhini pilotada por Bruno Garfinkel e Ricardo Mauricio.

    A prova teve um momento de emoção redobrada na metade final, quando a chuva chegou e os pilotos foram obrigados a realizar uma parada para a troca de pneus. Neste momento a equipe Lamborghini Cimed realizou um ótimo trabalho de pit stop e colocou Daniel Serra na liderança. A vitória da equipe teve transmissão ao vivo para todo Brasil pelo canal Rede TV! Chico Longo elogiou o trabalho de todos do time. “O Daniel pilotou muito, principalmente na chuva. Não posso deixar de elogiar o trabalho da equipe. Eles foram muito rápidos na troca de pneus. Na minha ‘tocada’ consegui ficar próximos dos lideres e entregar o carro em 5º. Foi um bom trabalho de todos”, disse. Daniel Serra também foi só elogios a todos da equipe. “Foi uma corrida complicada por causa da chuva na parte final. Mas o trabalho de pit stop foi fundamental para me dar tranqüilidade na liderança da prova. O Longo me entregar o carro entre os primeiros também foi muito importante. Estamos muito satisfeitos com esta vitória”, disse.

    Na primeira corrida deste domingo, onde Longo/Serra largavam na pole, o time não foi para a pista com um problema de amortecedor. Foi necessário a troca da peça para a corrida 2 onde o time venceu.

    Fonte: Impress

    GT Brasil - Lambo vence em CuritibaGT Brasil - Lambo vence em CuritibaGT Brasil - Lambo vence em CuritibaGT Brasil - Lambo vence em Curitiba


  • Real Goddamn Flying Nazi Soldiers With Jet Packs [Weapons]

    There’s probably only one thing more terrifying than Nazi soldiers: Nazi soldiers with jet packs—and Nazi UFOs piloted by nefarious hamsters. The difference is that, while the UFOs never existed, the Nazi jet pack did: Behold, the Himmelstürmer. More »