Category: News

  • US and UK carriers announce Samsung Galaxy S4 pre-orders

    Samsung Galaxy S4 fans, be prepared to use your credit cards because it’s pre-order season. A number of UK carriers, including Vodafone, EE and O2 have the new Android smartphone flagship on pre-order today, while in the United States AT&T announced that prospective buyers will have to wait until next month to get their hands on a new Galaxy S4 before it hits online and brick-and-mortar stores.

    AT&T revealed that the Galaxy S4 will be available for pre-order starting with April 16 for $249.99 on a two-year contract. The carrier does not specify which model will be offered, but the 32GB Galaxy S4 is a good guess judging by the price of its predecessor at launch, during pre-orders. If 16GB, the price would be $50 higher than Galaxy S3 at launch and what iPhone 5 sells for today.

    Vodafone UK offers the Galaxy S4 for pre-order, with no upfront cost, starting with GBP42 per month on a two-year plan. For the money customers get unlimited minutes and texts and 2GB of cellular data. The carrier also accepts trading-in a touchscreen phone, which makes the smartphone available, again, with no upfront cost, for GBP37 per month on a two-year plan (without a trade customers have to pay GBP69 instead). The plan comes with unlimited minutes and texts and 1GB of cellular data.

    EE (formerly known as Everything Everywhere) also lists the Galaxy S4 for pre-order. For the smartphone, the lowest upfront cost is GBP19.99 for GBP56 per month on a two-year plan, while the highest upfront cost is GBP269.99 for GBP31 per month for the same contract length. Both plans feature unlimited minutes and texts, but the former comes with 8GB of cellular data while the latter only offers 500MB of cellular data.

    O2 lists the Galaxy S4 for pre-order with an online exclusive offer. Customers have to shell out GBP99.99 in upfront cost and GBP37 per month with a two-year contract. The plan includes unlimited minutes and texts and 2GB of cellular data.

  • Big, open data: MapR on Github and Yelp’s dataset challenge

    If you’re into open source, or at least open data, today is a good day. Hadoop vendor MapR has open sourced a portion of its source code on Github and Maven, while Yelp has released a sample of its data as part of a $5,000 challenge to find the most-innovative use for it.

    MapR’s decision to open source parts of it code is significant, but not groundbreaking. The company is only releasing its improvements to a handful of Hadoop-related Apache projects that are included in the MapR distribution of Hadoop, but not the proprietary code that’s MapR’s real competitive advantage in the contentious Hadoop market. While it’s still not flying the all-open-source banner like Hortonworks is, the code release puts MapR more on par with competitor Cloudera, which bolsters its open source aspects with some proprietary software for managing Hadoop clusters.

    MapR also took another step in the open source direction on Thursday, announcing a partnership with Canonical that integrates MapR’s M3 distribution with the Ubuntu Linux operating system. The two also have plans to ease the installation of MapR’s Hadoop software on OpenStack-based cloud infrastructure.

    I wrote recently in relation to MapR’s $30 million VC investment that the company is in a tricky position when it comes to open source. The Hadoop ecosystem was built on open source and still values it immensely, but some customers are definitely willing to pay money for products that deliver the features they want, open source or not.

    As for Yelp, well, it’s just following in the footsteps of many companies — Netflix and everyone doing something on Kaggle (including GigaOM) — in trying to find new ways to use its data. The data set it’s releasing is from the Phoenix, Ariz., area and include 11,537 businesses, 8,282 checkin sets, 43,873 users and 229,907 reviews. The deadline for entries is May 20, and they can be submitted in pretty much any form you can imagine.

    Hopefully, for Yelp’s sake, it doesn’t step in it the way other companies — including Netflix and AOL — have when they released supposedly anonymous data sets that were later de-anonymized. Releasing data sets gives clear benefits to both the source companies and institutions or individuals accessing the data, but privacy snafus have a away sneaking up and mitigating some of the goodwill.

    Feature image courtesy of Shutterstock user Jakub Krechowicz.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Powerball Winner Owes $29K In Child Support

    As previously reported, someone in New Jersey won the Powebrall jackpot in Saturday night’s drawing. The pot was $338 million. The winner shouldn’t be the only one getting paid, however.

    It turns out that winner Pedro Quezada owes $29,000 in back child support. As reported by both NPR and Reuters, New Jersey law enforcement officials have said as much. Hopefully he’ll set aside some of the remaining cash for any future payments he’s accountable for.

    According to Reuters, Quezada opted for the lump sum payment for his winnings, which will get him $211 million. That should still take care of it. The report also quotes a statement from the sheriff, saying Quezada is subject to potential arrest until the warrant is satisfied.

    The Powerball website has a page that shares winners’ stories. I wonder if the child support part will make it in Quezada’s story. So far, the story is not on the site, and is listed as “pending”.

    Quezada’s winning numbers were: 17, 29, 31, 52, 53, Powerball: 31. In addition to the jackpot winner, Saturday’s drawing saw a Match 5 Power Play winner ($2 million) in Iowa, and $1 million Match 5 winners in Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Minnesota, North Carolina, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Virginia. There were a total of 2,486,305 winners on Saturday, and $30,662,765 in non-jackpot prizes won.

    The current Powerball jackpot is at $50 million with the next drawing scheduled for Saturday.

  • Exclusive: Cumulogic snags seed money from Crunchfund

    Cumulogic, the erstwhile Java Platform-as-a-Service company that is morphing into a broader cloud platform services provider, has new seed funding from Crunchfund that it will use to build out its sales channels. CEO Michael Soby would not disclose the amount of the round but said it brings total funding to about $1 million.

    cumulogicchart2

    The Santa Clara, Calif. company has also signed deals with a handful of integration partners that give it broad geographic coverage. They are: Redapt, based in Redmond, Wash.; Cloud Technology Partners out of Boston: CloudOps of Montreal; Shapeblue in London; Cloud Niners in Egypt with another integrator in Asia to be announced soon, Soby said.

    Cumulogic’s rather ambitious pitch is that it will enable companies to mix and match cloud services from many providers and run them on the cloud infrastructure of the customers’ choice whether it’s VMware’s vCloud Director, Cloudstack (Citrix was an early investor), OpenStack or Amazon Web Services. Cumulogic also claims that service providers or enterprises themselves can manage all of those choices from the proverbial “single pane of glass.” That’s a big promise.

    “If a developer wants to deploy MongoDB against Amazon and a load balancer against Rackspace, he can do that through our platform,” Soby said in an interview.

    And, for the many companies still nervous about deploying critical applications in the public cloud, it will also let them re-create AWS-style pay-as-you-go services inside their firewalls, Soby said. A pre-release version of Cumulogic Cloud running on HPCloud is available here.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Playdek Closes $3.8M Series A To Build A Digital Community Where Tabletop Gamers Can Feel At Home

    playdek

    Fresh from putting smiles on the faces of tabletop gaming geeks everywhere, with yesterday’s news that it would be helping to bring Dungeons & Dragons to iOS devices later this year, mobile game publisher Playdek has closed a $3.8 million Series A funding round.

    The round was led by Qualcomm Incorporated, via its venture investment arm, Qualcomm Ventures, with IDG Ventures and ff Venture Capital also participating. Existing investors Deep Fork Capital, Greycroft Partners, Jarl Mohn and unnamed angel investors also joined in. The company had previously raised $1.56 million in funding from its seed and Angel rounds — taking its total funding post-Series A to $5.36 million.

    Playdek said the new funding will allow it to expand its digital hobby games portfolio with new launches, including its forthcoming app, Agricola, based on the strategy board game of the same name. Flagship existing titles from Playdek include its Ascension series.

    The company’s other big plan for the funding is to build a hobby gamer community and online platform for players to meet and hang out, due to launch later this year. It said this platform will “provide the services that hobby gamers value” — so presumably stuff like leaderboards ranking players by score and forums to discuss the merits of different gaming strategies. In a press statement, Joel Goodman, CEO, said it would be about “giving gamers that ‘around the table’ feeling in the digital realm”. The platform will also offer events and tournaments.

    Commenting on the funding in a statement, Phil Sanderson, Managing Director, IDG Ventures said: “The market category is poised for growth, and Playdek has proven that it is the expert when it comes to bringing this dedicated audience what they want in mobile gameplay.”

    “Playdek gives gamers what they want — compelling online games based on the franchises they know and love.  Playdek allows people to explore these worlds and stories in a compelling new way,” added John Frankel, ff Venture Capital, also in a statement. “We love the team, the strategy, and what they have done to date; we expect great things from them in the future.”

  • Klout Score Now Takes Into Account Instagram Data

    Klout has just announced that its adding another element into your influence score: Instagram.

    “Instagram generates some of social media’s most beautiful and engaging content, and is one of the most highly-requested networks by Klout users. Starting this week, all your Instagram activities will be part of your Klout Score, and your most popular photos will appear in your Klout Moments. We are rolling out this integration by phases so some of our users might have seen their score increase due to Instagram before this post,” says the company on its blog.

    Klout is also announcing more fruit from its partnership with Bing. Starting today, you can connect your Klout account to Bing. And in the future, search results will being to factor into your Klout score.

    Bing and Klout first announced their partnership back in September of last year. Shortly after that, Klout began to take into account Facebook Pages.

    Also:

    “Bing is now displaying Klout Scores for high-profile professionals and socially active influencers right in Bing search results. At a glance, it is easy to see an influencer’s Klout Score and expertise without having to click any further.”

    Earlier this month, Klout launched Klout for Business so the businesses can “find the influencers in your audience.”

  • Shopster grocery list app learns what you like and where you shop

    Add to the list another thing your iOS can do for you: remind you to run your errands.

    A new app just hit the iOS App Store called Shopster that uses the geo-location services in the iPhone (or iPad or iPod touch) to not only keep track of where you frequently buy your groceries, but what you buy at which store. Then it can notify you when you’re near those locations and what you might possibly need to run in and grab.

    Shopster costs 99 cents and it’s iOS only right now. The developer is Quadion Technologies, a software company based in Buenos Aires. Previous iOS titles under its belt are games; Shopster is the first utility app.

    ShopsterThe design of the app is simple and cheerful. There are just a few screens: one for your items you’ve said you need to buy, one for items you’ve previously purchased, and another that shows you the stores you’ve frequently purchased a specific item at on a map.

    There’s not much to learn either. There’s a sliding bar on the right hand side that suggests quantities (so you don’t have to jump to the numbers keyboard on your iOS device). You select a quantity then start typing “sourdough bread” or whatever you need to buy. Once you’re at the store and you tap the check box to mark sourdough off your list, the app makes note of the geo-position of the store for that particular item. It doesn’t delete the item, but moves it to the “purchased” page for later.

    Just after playing with it for a bit, I can see a few ways this would come in handy. For example, if you really like the produce at your neighborhood market, but prefer to get your meats at the butcher across town, Shopster will notify you when you’re near those places of what you’ve noted you need to pick up. Another way to use it: if you hunted all over town in a panic for fenugreek seeds before a dinner party and then later can’t remember where you found it, if you marked it off your Shopster checklist at that store, the app will be able to tell you the name. It’s also just a simple way to keep a running grocery list. Once you check something off as purchased, it goes to the “past purchases” tab. Need to remind yourself to buy it again next week? Just uncheck the box and it goes back on your “to buy” list.

    Shopster is aimed at keeping lists of frequently bought items, so groceries is the natural application. But it doesn’t have to be used that way: if there are supplies or parts you often need to pick up locally, Shopster would work with that too.

    They’re not doing it yet, but it’s easy to see that one day Quadion could begin to incorporate coupons or deals from grocers or other retailers if they know what you shop for at their store. It could be similar to what ZipList offers with coupons, but with the added twist that Shopster actually knows when you’re in the store or nearby.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • BlackBerry co-founder Mike Lazaridis to leave company on May 1st

    BlackBerry Co-Founder Mike Lazaridis Resigns
    A little over a year since stepping down as co-CEO of Research in Motion, Mike Lazaridis announced following the company’s first quarter earnings report that he plans to leave his position as vice chairman and director of the board on May 1st. Lazaridis founded BlackBerry (BBRY) in 1984 with Jim Balsillie and served as its co-chief executive until last year. Balsillie resigned from BlackBerry in March of 2012 and recently announced that he had sold all of his shares in the struggling company. Lazaridis said that leaving the company will give him more time to focus on his new Quantum Valley Investments venture.

    Continue reading…

  • Google Analytics Real Time Reports Get Even Better

    The real-time feature is probably the best thing Google has done for Google Analytics in a long time, at least for publishers like us. Now the feature is getting even better.

    Google announced some improvements to its real-time reports, including the ability to analyze Events in real-time, breakdown real-time by Desktop/Tablet/Mobile traffic, create shortcuts to your favorite real-time segments, and compare real-time filtered data against overall real-time data.

    “With the real-time events report, you can now not only see the top events as they occur but also filter on particular event categories (and actions),” the Google Analytics team notes in a blog post. “Additionally, you can see whether particular segments of visitors trigger different events and debug your events deployment in real time.”

    “If you are trying to see what events a particular segment of visitors generate, that is easy as well,” Google adds. “Any filters you set up in any part of real-time are preserved in the Events report. For example, in the above screengrab we have set up a filter here to see what events are triggered from visitors coming via organic search.”

    The breakdown by Desktop/Tablet/Mobile feature is going to be an interesting one to watch, and will give publishers a better sense of their current audience at any given second.

    More on the changes here.

    Earlier this week, Google also launched some new social reports for Google Analytics.

  • Angry Birds Star Wars Travels To Cloud City

    Back in January, Rovio released a new expansion for Angry Birds Star Wars called “Escape from Hoth.” The level pack covered the first half of The Empire Strikes Back, and now a new expansion finishes the story.

    Rovio announced today that the Cloud City level pack is now available for Angry Birds Star Wars. Players can look forward to new levels, new gameplay features, and even a new character from this level pack:

  • Explore Cloud City in an all new episode!
  • Battle your way through 20 new Bespin levels!
  • Introducing steam gameplay mechanics.
  • Unlock the new Boba Fett Missions by collecting all 5 hidden rocket packs, via promotion code, or via in-app purchase!
  • Brag about your trophies using the new Twitter integration!
  • The Boba Fett pig sounds awesome, but I feel like there’s a missed opportunity here for a Lando Calrissian bird. It would be even better if the bird was voiced by Billy Dee Williams. I can dream, right?

    Putting my unattainable dreams aside, you can grab Angry Birds Star Wars from Google Play and the Apple Appstore today.

  • Bikram Sex Scandal Rocks Yoga Community

    Though the sexual roots of yoga have been all but purged from the practice the “spiritual” attachments have remained. This means that there are still “spiritual” leaders of certain styles of yoga. That, along with the teacher-student power dynamics inherent in yoga classes, can create an atmosphere ripe for the exploitation of authority.

    This week, the yoga world was shaken by a lawsuit that has been filed against the founder of Bikram Yoga, Choudhury Bikram. According to a Gawker report, a woman named Sarah Baughn claims that Bikram sexually harassed and assaulted her during a yoga instructor training camp in 2005.

    Baughn claims that Bikram came onto her during the camp, even going so far as to tell her that he knew her “from a past life,” and that he had a special type of feeling for her. Baughn rejected his offers, but claims she was later assaulted by the teacher. She states that Bikram “pinned her against a door” and humped her leg while kissing her face, neck, and chest.

    The Bikram Yoga organization has released a rebuttal to the charges laid out in the lawsuit:

    Bikram Choudhury has spent over 50 years bringing the benefits of Bikram Yoga to people through his teaching and the creation of his worldwide Bikram hot yoga organization.

    He is disappointed by the false charges made in this lawsuit. However, the matter is in the hands of his attorneys, and he will not comment at this time.

    Bikram expresses gratitude to all who have reached out to express their love and support.

  • Colbert Takes on That Revealing Facebook Likes Study

    A couple of weeks ago, we looked into a recent study by Cambridge University on Facebook likes and just how revealing they are.

    Long story short – they’re quite revealing. The researchers were able to accurately predict subjects’ activities and personality traits based on what they liked on Facebook, even when those likes weren’t specifically about the particular proclivities. For instance, a user didn’t have to like the page “I love being gay” in order for researchers to determine that the user was indeed gay. Around 80% of the time, they could rightly infer it based on other sorts of likes, for instance “Britney Spears” or the show “Desperate Housewives.”

    The bottom line is that your likes tell a lot about you, and unless you go to great lengths to make your 100, 200, maybe even thousands of likes non-public, people are going to be able to make judgements about you.

    Such the rub when you use a public social network. Deal with it or don’t, it’s up to you.

    The Colbert Report looked into the topic of these revealing Facebook likes, and basically came to this conclusion:

    “Facebook likes can reveal your personality traits, just as Friendster likes can reveal that you stopped using the internet in 2003.”

    No, wait, that’s not a conclusion. That’s just a Friendster jab. Low hanging fruit there, Colbert.

    “I don’t need some study to tell me who’s gay and who isn’t. That’s what scarves are for.”

  • The Daily Mail: Paywall? We don’t need no stinking paywall

    “Badges? We ain’t got no badges. We don’t need no badges! I don’t have to show you any stinkin’ badges!” — Gold Hat, Treasure of the Sierra Madre

    As newspapers around the world rush to erect paywalls to bolster their declining revenue — with Britain’s Telegraph and Sun papers just the latest to join the parade, along with the Washington Post — there are a few holdouts who insist on generating revenue the old-fashioned way: namely, through advertising. One of the most prominent proponents of this model is the Daily Mail, which has become one of the world’s largest news websites. The Mail’s approach may not be for everyone, but according to the paper it is working extremely well, thank you very much.

    The data behind that boast comes from an investor presentation that Media Briefing sat in on recently by the paper’s parent company, DMG Media, in which the company projected that its digital revenue could soon exceed its print revenue — a transition that few newspapers could even think about realistically at this point, let alone forecast for the near future. And the Mail says this isn’t happening as a result of declining revenue overall, as it is with some newspapers.

    Daily Mail revenue

    So what accounts for this kind of success? Critics would argue that it is the Mail‘s somewhat lackadaisical approach to accuracy, since a number of the newspaper’s most popular stories consist of rumors or salacious tidbits that in some cases turn out not to be true. But is this any different from any number of tabloid newspapers before the web came along? It may not be the course that the New York Times or Washington Post want to take, but there is no arguing with the results.

    In a nutshell, the Mail‘s approach is to give the web what it wants — interesting stories, many of them about celebrities or odd events, and plenty of variety: the paper says it updates the home page every 30 minutes at least, which it believes is part of the reason it gets over 100 million unique visitors a month. And the engagement levels aren’t just orders of magnitude larger than other newspapers, but impressive even compared to sites such as Yahoo:

    Daily Mail engagement

    Obviously, not everyone can be (or wants to be) the Daily Mail. But whatever its flaws, the paper has done a pretty good job of being web-native, not just recreating a paper experience online. It’s the same approach that digital-only content publishers like BuzzFeed and The Huffington Post have taken, and while it may not produce as much revenue as print advertising does, the Mail has shown that it is possible to grow that business.

    And what about a paywall? Editorial director Michael Clarke said during the presentation: “We’re not throwing in the towel because we don’t have to. We don’t feel at the moment that’s the way to go… We have scale, engagement and growth.” (Note: We are going to be discussing different models for monetization at our paidContent Live conference in New York on April 17).

    Post and thumbnail image courtesy of Shutterstock / kak2s, slides courtesy of Media Briefing

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • PeerCDN uses WebRTC to build a browser-based P2P CDN

    Now this is cool: A group of web hackers has built a P2P-based CDN that crowdsources the delivery of data on a website with the help of a bit of Javascript. PeerCDN as the project is called, is based on WebRTC, an emerging technology that’s been built to facilitate real-time communication like voice and video chat in the browser without the need for any plugin. From the PerCDN website:

    “PeerCDN automatically serves a site’s static resources (images, videos, and file downloads) over a peer-to-peer network made up of the visitors currently on the site. Offloading part of the web hosting burden to site visitors reduces bandwidth costs.”

    The project also made a screencast to explain their approach – check it out:

    PeerCND uses WebRTC’s data channel protocol, which was designed to allow developers of real-time communication applications to have their participants exchange data other than audio or video. Think of a file transfer during a teleconference, or a multiplayer game based on WebRTC. And in the case of PeerCDN, it sends files of a website directly from visitor to visitor.

    The downside of this approach is that WebRTC is still in its infancy. The data channel protocol has been implemented in Chrome as well as nightlies of Firefox, which means that it will be available to the average Firefox user some time in the near future. Both browsers together “account for 58% of global browser usage,” as the PeerCDN site points out.

    However, disputes around the way forward for WebRTC have complicated an implementation in Microsoft’s Internet Explorer, and there is no word yet from Apple whether it will support the technology in Safari. Still, site owners don’t necessarily need all of their visitors to buy in, especially since PeerCDN can be combined with a traditional CDN.

    PeerCDN was built in part by Feross Aboukhadijeh, who is famous for some of his HTML5 exploits. Recently, Aboukhadijeh built a website that automatically filled up its visitors hard discs with gigabytes of cat pictures. Before that, he built a YouTube search site called YTInstant.

    Image courtesy of Flickr user  Tsahi Levent-Levi.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Take Advantage of T-Mobile’s New Plans with Affordable Phones

    When T-Mobile introduced new plans earlier this week it did more than just undercut most of its postpaid competition. It also started testing out a new paradigm, one in which users pay for their service and phones separately. Under the scheme that the other three major carriers employ, you’re paying an inflated price that takes into account device subsidy, even if your device isn’t being actively subsidized.

    With T-Mobile, you pay for your device and then you select a plan. Unfortunately for most, that up-front cost can be a huge turnoff. For many it can make a new phone purchase impossible. That’s why T-Mobile has instituted a system that amounts to zero percent financing on all handsets. You make a specified down payment, which is typically far less than the price of a subsidized phone. Then you pay between $5 and $20 monthly for 24 months, which is the typical length of a cell phone contract.

    The result is some pretty attractive pricing for older, but stuill usable, Android smartphones. T-Mobile has some great deals advertised for those. Here are just some of the intriguing options you’ll find:

    • The HTC One S for $9.99 down and $15 per month.
    • The Samsung Galaxy S II for $29.99 down and $16 per month.
    • The Samsung Galaxy S III for $69.99 down and $20 per month.
    • The LG Optimus L9 for $48.99 down and $8 per month.

    You add that monthly payment to the plan cost. If you only need 500MB of data, it’s just $50 per month. Many can get by with 2.5GB of data, which costs $60 per month. Unlimited data costs $70 per month. So, for instance, you can get the Galaxy S III for $70 down and $80 per month for 24 months. That’s a sweeter deal than you’re going to find with other carriers.

    If you’re looking to switch, or even to upgrade with T-Mobile, make sure to check out Android phone deals at T-Mobile.

    The post Take Advantage of T-Mobile’s New Plans with Affordable Phones appeared first on MobileMoo.

  • Activision Brings The Uncanny Valley To Games

    Activision may be perceived as a money-making machine that just throws out the same game every year, but the company is heavily invested in the future of gaming technology. Take for instance this new real-time face rendering tech the company unveiled at GDC.

    Well, that’s certainly unnerving. Here I thought Heavy Rain was pretty realistic, but this is in an entirely different league.

    Here’s how they did it:

    This animated character is being rendered in real-time on current video card hardware, using standard bone animation. The rendering techniques, as well as the animation pipeline are being presented at GDC 2013, “Next Generation Character Rendering” on March 27. The original high resolution data was acquired from Light Stage Facial Scanning and Performance Capture by USC Institute for Creative Technologies, then converted to a 70 bones rig, while preserving the high frequency detail in diffuse, normal and displacement composite maps. It is being rendered in a DirectX11 environment, using advanced techniques to faithfully represent the character’s skin and eyes.

    For another example, here’s a screenshot of another face created using the same tech:

    Activision Brings The Uncanny Valley To Games

    For more examples and information on how Activision achieved this, check out their blog.

  • 500 Startups announces Parker Thompson as partner, has plans for SF office

    A new partner will be joining 500 Startups, the startup accelerator plans to announce Thursday. The group is also announcing its new offices in New York, and that it has one planned for San Francisco in the future.

    Parker Thompson, who was previously the director of business development for Pivotal Labs, will be joining Dave McClure’s startup accelerator and investment firm. 500 Startups wrote in a press release how Thompson’s new role will fit with the group:

    “We’re also pumped to announce Parker Thompson as the latest addition to the our team. He’ll work with our accelerator program while also helping us grow our presence in the San Francisco startup scene. He comes to 500 from Pivotal Labs, where he built dozens of startup products and helped grow the team from 10 to 150 before the company was acquired in 2012 by EMC. Parker also co­founded a location-­based social networking company pre­-smartphone, and worked at Internet Archive on big data problems before the term even existed. Basically, he was working in tech before it was cool.”

    Existing 500 Startups employee George Kellerman will also be promoted to partner at 500 Startups, and partner Paul Singh is now founder and CEO at dashboard.io, although he will continue to work as a partner as he did before.

    Dave McClure’s 500 Startups has always had an international focus, and debuted its most recent batch of companies back in February.

    The accelerator is also officially announcing that it has opened a New York office, and has plans for one in San Francisco (the group is currently located down in Mountain View.) The addition of a San Francisco office is interesting in light of the recent trend among some internet companies like Airbnb and Pinterest moving up to the city.

    To continue our east coast takeover and support #500Strong NYC­based startups, we’ve opened an office in Manhattan’s historic Flatiron district. In addition to providing space for our startups (and 500 Venture Partner Shai Goldman), we’ll use the space to host meetups, tech talks, and (of course) parties. To get some hipster cred back on the West Coast, we plan on opening a San Francisco office sometime within the next year. We’ll have more on that when it happens.”

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • The Delicate Art of Giving Feedback

    To be an effective manager, you need to be skilled at giving out both praise and criticism. While praise is easy to give, it is far more challenging and unpleasant to criticize your employees. Yet the practice of management requires you to occasionally show employees where they need to improve. Thus, it is vital for managers to learn how and when to give negative feedback.

    The first thing to realize is that people generally respond more strongly to negative events than positive ones. In other words, we are usually more upset about losing $100 than we are happy about winning $100. In fact, in an influential book, John Gottman (now a Professor Emeritus at the University of Washington) suggested that positive interactions must outnumber negative interactions by at least five to one in order for a marriage to succeed.

    This observation is also true in the workplace, as Professor Andrew Miner (then of the University of Minnesota) and colleagues discovered in a study published in 2005. They recorded employees’ moods several times each day and, each time, asked them if any events (such as a positive interaction with a co-worker) had occurred within the past few hours.

    Their results showed that employees reacted to a negative interaction with their boss six times more strongly than they reacted to a positive interaction with their boss. This suggests that negative feedback can have significant adverse effects on an employee’s well-being — and, presumably, their productivity.

    What does this observation mean for managers? Put simply, managers need to be cautious before criticizing employees.

    To start with, you should avoid inadvertently criticizing any of your employees. For instance, if an employee writes a first draft of a written document, some managers might want to suggest some minor revisions even if the draft was generally good. In these situations, managers should clearly communicate that their revisions are merely suggestions coming from a second pair of eyes — and that they aren’t criticizing their employee’s performance.

    More generally, managers need to weigh the tradeoffs involved in making negative feedback. If you criticize your employees, you will likely provide some corrective information, but you will also put your employee in a bad mood. If an error is so inconsequential that the corrective value of criticism is low, it might make sense for you to keep that feedback to yourself.

    Of course, there are situations when a manager must provide negative feedback. On these occasions, don’t lose sight of your purpose for offering that feedback: to improve the employee’s performance going forward. As much as you might want to excoriate your employee for what you believe is a spectacularly awful performance, your business gains nothing from it.

    In fact, shaming your employee is likely to have substantial negative effects on your business. In research reported in HBR, Christine Porath and Christine Pearson found that many employees considered themselves to be on the receiving end of workplace incivility, such as overly harsh criticism from their boss. According to their research, nearly half of these employees decide to intentionally decrease their productivity.

    Instead, in order to obtain the desired corrective effects of negative feedback, you should take steps to soften the emotional blow. You want your employees to focus on the message that you’re trying to convey, rather than any intense negative emotions.

    At a bare minimum, make sure to deliver your criticism in private. There’s nothing more humiliating than being criticized in front of your co-workers. And it is critical to keep your tone collaborative. Make clear that your employee still has your support and your respect.

    One strategy for providing feedback is to start by literally saying, “Let me provide you with some feedback.” That statement lets the employee prepare emotionally for what you’re about to say; in my experience, it also seems to activate the calm, rational part of the employee’s brain rather than the defensive, emotional part.

    Negative feedback is a key tool in the effective manager’s kit. But you must use it wisely and carefully, or else they will do more harm than good. Focus on potential future improvements, instead of dwelling on past errors. And think twice whether an error truly requires negative feedback: criticism can have an unexpectedly large impact on an employee’s happiness and productivity.

    And this approach should be generally reversed when it comes to praise. Unlike criticism, managers should bestow their employees with praise generously, publicly, and at every opportunity — especially at the culmination of projects. While most bosses seem to think that they dole out praise by the dozen, I rarely meet an employee who feels that the boss sufficiently values his or her achievements. So, as often as possible, tell your employees how much you appreciate their commitment and hard work.

  • 500 Startups Opens New York Office, Adds Partner

    500 Startups is expanding its investing team and geographic footprint with an office in New York and plans for a San Francisco location. The seed fund and accelerator program run by Dave McClure has hired Parker Thomson as a venture partner and promoted George Kellerman to partner, according to a blog post.

    Paul Singh, meanwhile, will become CEO of dashboard.io, where he is the founder, and remain a venture partner at 500 Startups.

    The New York “co-working” space is located in the Flatiron district and will have room for local startups. 500 Startups expects to open its San Francisco office in a few months.

    Thomson comes to the firm from Pivotal Labs and will guide the San Francisco operations along with helping to run the accelerator. Kellerman heads up fundraising and investor relations and will lead investments in Japan.

    Singh’s dashboard.io recently raised $750,000 from 500 Startups, NextGen Angels, LX Ventures, Voodoo Ventures and others.

    The firm announced the new offices and staff changes in a blog post.

    The post 500 Startups Opens New York Office, Adds Partner appeared first on peHUB.

  • The Rise of Executive Feminism

    In the aftermath of the publication of Sheryl Sandberg’s Lean In, two things are becoming clear. One: we are in the midst of a powerful new feminist movement. And two: the backlash has already begun.

    Led by high-powered women like Sandberg and Princeton professor Anne-Marie Slaughter, a new wave of executive feminism has emerged aimed squarely at the highest levels of the professional world. And it’s becoming increasingly clear that’s sorely needed: Only 21 Fortune 500 CEOs are women. Women make up 15 percent of Fortune 500 executive officers and 15 percent of law firm equity partners. They make up 30 percent of doctors, but comprise barely more than 10 percent of doctors in each of the top five highest-paid medical specialties.

    For a while it looked like this problem would fix itself, but at this point we’ve being waiting for top-level women to emerge from the pipeline for forty years. Waiting isn’t working. Women earn more college degrees than men, make up about 46 percent of the labor force, and hold more than half of managerial and professional positions. But men still run the world. (Literally — women make up 18 percent of the United States Congress, and about 20 world leaders out of 193 United Nations recognized states.)

    Women leak out of the pipeline well before they reach the top. To take one example, women’s law school enrollment peaked in 1993, at 50.4 percent. Twenty years later, when these women should be reaching the peaks of their careers, they make up barely 15 percent of law firm equity partners.

    It’s not your mother’s gender inequality — but it’s no less real. At current rates, it will take nearly three centuries for women to reach parity as CEOs of Fortune 500 companies. Here’s where we stand: Women can get low-paid jobs. They can get middle-management jobs. Very few have jobs at the top.

    This is the new frontier of feminism. Quite suddenly, some of the women who have reached the top are speaking out about just how hard it is for women to get there. Executive feminists like Sandberg and Slaughter have eschewed the long-held wisdom that leading an open discussion on gender bias is a bad career move. They follow Mika Brzezinski, who led the way with an impassioned book about gender bias in pay in 2011.

    Research shows that women who succeed in jobs dominated by men, not surprisingly, often do so by distancing themselves from other women. What’s impressive is that Sandberg, Slaughter, and Brzezinski aren’t following that conventional wisdom. They are embracing change with the argument that maybe executive feminism is just what we need to jump-start the stalled gender revolution. More women in power might well lead to greater success in other arenas: note that every female GOP senator voted for the recent reauthorization of the Violence Again Women Act. The people in power are the people who shape policy, whether in business or in politics or in the neighborhood garden club. It’s as simple as that.

    The conversation these women have started is easy to dismiss. One line of attack is implicit in the gleeful (and exaggerated) coverage of Sandberg and Slaughter’s differences: Typical women, whining and catfighting. The other criticism is that executive feminists are out of touch with regular people — they all have nannies; what do they know about an average woman’s struggles? The backlash against executive feminism gets at the heart of what’s really holding women back: the kind of subtle bias that has stalled women’s progress.

    The first major theme, the catfight narrative, has persisted despite the lack of evidence to support it. To hear many people tell it, Slaughter and Sandberg are at each other’s throats; Jodi Kantor in The New York Times claims that they have “quietly developed perhaps the most notable feminist row since Ms. Friedan refused to shake Gloria Steinem’s hand decades ago.” Her evidence? Unnamed sources, and a statement by Slaughter that Sandberg’s book “has made a real contribution, but it’s only half the story.” Since when is “real contribution” an insult?

    Meanwhile, Slaughter has been tweeting compliments, and wrote a positive review of Sandberg’s book for the New York Times Book Review. The day Kantor’s story was published, Slaughter enthusiastically recommended Sandberg’s book to a roomful of young women at Yale Law School, where Rachel is a student. It’s deeply important to watch these patterns play out at such a visible level. Women from all walks of life have watched as a disagreement they’ve had with another woman gets twisted out of proportion and recast as a petty blood feud. Having smart and savvy role models hash these biases out in the spotlight helps women far beyond the boardroom.

    The backlash’s second theme highlights society’s lingering discomfort with powerful women. No one would ever think of scoffing at Warren Buffet for failing to consider his janitor’s perspective in telling his life story. But that’s the criticism that was leveled at Sandberg in an op-ed in the Washington Post. Over at the New York Times, Maureen Dowd made a baffling leap from the fact that Sandberg is an extremely talented businesswoman to the inference that Lean In is a cynical marketing move. A blogger for The Wall Street Journal compared Sandberg to Marie Antoinette. The message: wealth is unseemly in a woman.

    What do Slaughter and Sandberg know about an average woman’s struggles? Not much. Between the two of them, they have more wealth and political power than most small towns. That’s what we can learn from them.

    Scolding wealthy and powerful women for their ambition, for themselves and others, reflects the 19th century notion that the only suitable public role for women is an extension of their role as the “Angel in the House,” selflessly dedicating themselves to the welfare of others. We don’t think care work should be devalued — but an important step in changing that norm is to get women who understand the problem in positions of power. Then you get voices that can critique the low value given family work on a national scale, which is exactly what Slaughter did.

    Women will never reach, or thrive in, positions of power as long as their wealth is shameful or their opinions belittled. Executive feminism recognizes that even wealthy and powerful women run into gender bias — and the resulting clog in the pipeline affects all of us. If our automatic reaction is to criticize these women for being too powerful and too successful, that doesn’t mean she’s doing anything wrong. It means we are.