Category: News

  • Treasury Tells Obama To Block Chinese Investment In Nevada Gold Mine

    china gold bar

    Interesting announcement from small gold miner Firstgold. A unit of the Treasury department has informed it that it will seek to block a a planned investment from China.:

    —-

    Firstgold Corp. (TSX: FGD) (PINKSHEETS: FGOC) (“Firstgold” or “the Company”) has been advised by The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) that they will, on Dec 21st, recommend to President Obama that he reject the proposed investment by the China-based company Northwest Non Ferrous International Investment Company Ltd. (“Northwest”) in Firstgold. CFIUS has determined through their investigation that serious, significant and consequential national security issues existed. In particular they noted the proximity of Firstgold’s properties to the Fallon Naval Air Station and related facilities. CFIUS had considered several mitigation possibilities and concluded that none would sufficiently resolve the national security issues.

    “This is very difficult news to receive. While we certainly respect the process CFIUS has taken to arrive at their determination, we disagree 100% with their conclusion. We fail to see the connection between US national security and our principal asset the Relief Canyon mine, which has existed at its present location since the early 1980s. Our property is over 50 miles away from the Fallon base and surrounded by several other mining properties. At this stage we understand on Dec 21st that CFIUS will recommend rejection to President Obama. Our hope would be that his review of the matter will lead to a different and positive conclusion,” commented Terry Lynch Firstgold CEO.

    “You can imagine how discouraging this is for Northwest. At this stage we do not know what their intentions are although we remain hopeful that we can yet find a way to close the transaction. In the interim Firstgold is reviewing other options to bring Relief Canyon into production and to obtain value for its assets.”

    Firstgold has spent $16 million over the last 24 months developing a processing facility at Relief Canyon, located outside Lovelock Nevada, on the site of the previously producing Pegasus Gold Mine. Additional information about Firstgold Corp. can be found by visiting its web site at www.firstgoldcorp.com

    Join the conversation about this story »

    See Also:

  • East Coast Whiteout Wipes Out Super Saturday As Shoppers Stay Home To Avoid Big Snowfall

    Girl In A Snowball Fight

    So far the big storm has been a bust in New York City, although it has been intense south of here. Cherry Hill, New Jersey, for instance, has already seen 14 inches of snowfall.

    But the lack of snow doesn’t necessary mean that Super Saturday was salvaged for retailers. The warnings to stay off the roads and fears of blizzard like conditions most likely scared many shoppers out of the stores.

    We conducted a brief shopping trip to the Flat Iron and Union Square area today. We found that shops were crowded although not packed to overcapacity. It looked like it wasn’t quite the Super Saturday that retailers might have hoped for but not a complete wipe out either. Here’s the full East Coast report from Stephen Manning of the Associated Press.

    WASHINGTON — “Super Saturday” may just end up as Snowy Saturday in much of the eastern U.S.

    The last Saturday of shopping before Christmas, usually one of the busiest days of the year for retailers, was snowed out on most of the East Coast by blizzard-like conditions that stretched from the Carolinas to New England.

    Many retailers were open but crowds were sparse on a day stores count on for a successful season.

    Treacherous roads and near whiteout conditions kept many shoppers away from shopping malls and other stores. For retailers hoping for a better holiday season than last year’s dismal sales, the bad weather was especially painful.

    “You are looking at your busiest day of the year and taking it away,” said Steven Aarons, manager of Barstons Child Play, a toy store in Washington.

    Forecasts for the Washington region called for up to 20 inches of snow. A heavy coat was already on the ground by the time most stores opened around midmorning.

    Compounding problems were snow-covered roads and spotty public transportation. Shopping malls were especially affected by bad roads. In Washington, the Metro subway system shut down aboveground stations in the early afternoon, effectively cutting off rail service to many big suburban shopping centers.

    In the Friendship Heights section of the city, usually a bustling retail area with big department stores and upscale shops, most foot traffic came from work crews scraping away snow and spreading salt. Some big stores opened on time, but others remained dark after their posted opening hours. Even the Salvation Army stand was unstaffed.

    The King of Prussia Mall outside of Philadelphia opened on time at 8 a.m., but traffic was down significantly at the complex’s 365 stores and 40 restaurants, according to a spokesman. The mall’s traffic did get a boost Friday night from people wary of the coming storm.

    The holiday shopping season so far has been mildly encouraging for retailers who have suffered due to high unemployment and the weak economy that have made consumers reluctant to spend. Most reports put spending slightly above last year’s levels.

    At Tysons Corner Center, a mega-mall in the Washington region, only about half of the stores were open by midday and customer traffic was light. Jeff Hernandez, manager of a stationary store, said he wasn’t able to open until noon and would likely close before the mall shuts down later tonight.

    “I didn’t think it was worth it,” to stay open, he said.

    It’s still unclear how the storm will affect sales later in the week and whether consumers who stayed home Saturday would shift their shopping to Sunday. Much of the worst weather was expected to be over by late Saturday in the Washington region but last into Sunday morning farther north.

    Super Saturday usually accounts for $15 billion worth of sales nationwide, according to Scott Bernhardt of weather research firm Planalytics. The storm’s current track means it will likely impact about a quarter of the U.S. population. Those that do shop will likely make their trips short, he said.

    “They are going to dash in and dash out. They aren’t going to do any impulse buying,” he said.

    Retailers with an especially high concentration of stores in the affected region include Bon-Ton stores, DSW Shoe Warehouse and Kohl’s Inc.

    The effect on retailers is likely to be less than it would if the snow hit even later in the season, said Michael Niemira, chief economist of the International Council of Shopping Centers. They still have several days to make up the sales. And while the storm hit the heavily populated East Coast, most of the rest of the nation was unaffected by bad weather.

    The storm didn’t lead Niemira to change his estimate that November and December spending would rise 1 percent from last year.

    Online shopping also could get a boost as consumers buy from home rather than brave the bad weather.

    “People may just sit at home and shop,” said Hana Ben-Shabat, a partner in the retail practice at A.T. Kearney, a global management consultant.

    In New York, shoppers were trying to wrap up ahead of the storm.

    At Manhattan Mall, a few blocks away from Macy’s flagship store in New York, stores like J.C. Penney were still bustling at midday, when snow hadn’t yet materialized. But even shoppers who took the train in to the city were wary.

    Natalie McCann, of Edison, N.J., said she would probably cut short her annual trip into the city on the last Saturday because of the building storm. But it wasn’t the snow that was keeping her from spending big on gifts.

    “I’m just not that enthusiastic this year,” said McCann, 47, who says she’s cutting her spending significantly to about $750.

    Join the conversation about this story »

    See Also:

  • It’s Not Over: Iraq Sends Forces To Oil Well Seized By Iran

    Gulf War USA Iraq

    Don’t forget about this one. 

    It may be nothing, but it hasn’t gone away yet.

    —–

    BAGHDAD — Iraq deployed security forces Saturday near a remote oil well seized by Iran, officials said, and its government pressed Tehran to withdraw its forces from the area along their disputed southern border.

    U.S. officials applauded Iraq for standing its ground against Iran — an uneasy ally that analysts said was aiming to remind its neighbor of its economic and political pull in its takeover of the oil well Thursday. The site is located in one of the largest oil fields in Iraq and has about 1.5 billion barrels in reserves.

    The standoff was a dramatic display of the occasionally tense relations between the two oil-rich nations that fought an eight-year war in the 1980s but now share common ground in Shiite-led governments.

    “Again, we ask Iran to be committed to the good relations that they announced with Iraq and its nation, and to withdraw its forces immediately,” Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh told Al-Arabiyah TV. “This is the demand of Iraq, and we call Iran to be committed with that.”

    Iran, however, appeared undeterred.

    In a statement, the Iranian military denied it violated Iraq’s sovereignty and cited a 1975 border agreement in claiming the oil well as part of Iran’s territory.

    “Our forces are on our own soil and, based on the known international borders, this well belongs to Iran,” the Iranian military said in a statement to Iran’s Arabic-language Al-Alam satellite television.

    Iraqi army and police reinforcements were sent to a staging ground about a half-mile (1 kilometer) from well No. 4 at the al-Fakkah oil field, according to two Iraqi officials close to the site. Both spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the issue with the media.

    One of the Iraqi officials said Iranian soldiers came and went from the oil well throughout Saturday. They were gone by the evening, leaving behind an Iranian flag mounted at the well, the official said.

    The oil field, parts of which both countries claim as theirs, is located about 200 miles (about 320 kilometers) southeast of Baghdad. It was unclear how many troops were involved, and Iraqi forces barred journalists from approaching the area.

    The standoff spurred an emergency meeting of Iraq’s national security council and high-level diplomatic talks between Baghdad and Tehran. U.S. officials, already worried about Iran’s growing influence in the region, praised what they described as Baghdad’s quick but measured response to the dispute.

    “It does speak to the overall view here that they are not going to be pushed around by Iran,” U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Christopher Hill told reporters.

    Iran’s ambassador to Iraq, Hasan Kazemi Qomi, said he would use “diplomatic and technical mechanisms” to soothe tensions. And a spokesman for Iran’s Foreign Ministry accused foreign media of trying to “disrupt good relations” between Tehran and Baghdad.

    Experts said it is doubtful that Iran is seeking to provoke Iraq, its only other Shiite-led ally in the Middle East.

    Instead, Iran appears to be reasserting its place as having the world’s second-largest oil reserves at a time when Iraq is looking to cash in on their own, said Alex Vatanka of the Mideast Institute, a Washington think-tank.

    Oil fields along the disputed border have been frozen for years because of Iraq’s longtime inability to entice investors to drill. Iraq is planning to open some oil fields over the next decade and has held two rounds of bidding this year — the first since the war — to develop some sites. Al-Fakkah was among three fields that were combined in one offer in the first round of bidding in June, but the proposal fell through.

    At the same time, Iran’s leaders may be feeling more isolated as the result of its domestic political unrest and international disapproval of its nuclear program.

    “They are not looking for conflict — this is their way of projecting power,” Vatanka said. “They are saying, ‘Because we’re isolated, because we have internal problems, it doesn’t mean you can go in here and sign a deal on an oil field that is very close to our border without consulting us.’”

    Once bitter enemies, Iraq and Iran settled into a more positive, albeit tenuous, relationship after a Shiite-led government came to power following the 2003 U.S.-led invasion. U.S. military officials say Iran continues to fund and train fighters in Iraq and send weapons and equipment over the border — although less frequently now than in the past.

    Adm. Mike Mullen, America’s top military official said the oil well incident must be resolved between Iran and Iraq, and there were no plans by the United States to intervene.

    In Baghdad during a two-day visit to Iraq, Mullen said Saturday that he remains worried about Iran’s influence in the Middle East.

    Join the conversation about this story »

    See Also:

  • With Healthcare, Democrats Commit Unprecedented Act Of Political Suicide

    chris dodd

    So there’s now about a 90% chance that the health care bill will pass.

    At this point, the thing is more than a little inexplicable.  Democrats are on a political suicide mission; I’m not a particularly accurate prognosticator, but I think this makes it very likely that in 2010 they will lost several seats in the Senate–enough to make it damn hard to pass any more of their signature legislation–and will lose the house outright.  In the case of the House, you can attribute it to the fact that the leadership has safe seats.  But three out of four of the Democrats on the podium today are in serious danger of losing their seats.

    No bill this large has ever before passed on a straight party-line vote, or even anything close to a straight party-line vote.  No bill this unpopular has ever before passed on a straight party-line vote.  We’re in a new political world.  I’m not sure I understand it.

    The irony of this is that this bill is great for me personally.  I’m probably uninsurable, and I’m in a profession where most people now end up working for themselves at some point in their career. So mandatory community rating is great news for me and mine. But I think that it’s going to be a fiscal disaster for my country, because the spending cuts won’t be–can’t be–done the way they’re implemented in the bill.  We’ve just increased substantially the supply of unrepealable, unsustainable entitlements.  We’ve also, in my opinion, put ourselves on a road that leads eventually to less healthcare innovation, less healthcare improvement, and more dead people in the long run.  Obviously, progressives feel differently, and it will never be possible to prove the counterfactual. 

    So there you are.  Alea iacta est. I sure hope I’m wrong.

    Join the conversation about this story »

    See Also:

  • REPORT: GM to show Chevy Orlando-based GMC Granite and hi-po Buick Regal in Detroit

    Filed under: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


    GMC Granite will share a platform with the 2011 Chevrolet Orlando shown above

    It seems as though it’s just about impossible to keep an embargo in place these days. A Canadian outlet just spilled the beans on a couple of GM reveals set for Detroit next month. They say they were invited to a sneak preview Wednesday evening and although they couldn’t take pics, they felt free to tell us about the whole array of models. Some have been loosely-guarded secrets, but a couple are unknowns, so we’ll quote CanadianDriver on those until we get confirmation from GM.

    Apparently, The General will have a slew of new model introductions in the D next month, including the much-anticipated Camaro Convertible, the new, upsized Aveo, a substantially-revised Malibu, production versions of the Spark and Orlando, and two models we hadn’t heard about until now: A GMC version of the Orlando dubbed the Granite, and a “sport version of the Buick Regal” that should get “many of its performance parts from the 325-hp Opel Insignia OPC.” Hot dog, the Regal GS is apparently more than a wet dream. Bring on the Stage 1 and GNX.

    The Regal was just introduced in Los Angeles a couple of weeks ago, so the announcement of a performance model so soon thereafter seems a little strange — not that we’re complaining, mind you. The Granite is described as an “urban utility vehicle” and will be the smallest model in GMC’s history. A Denali edition can only be around the corner. We’ll get you more details as they are released and we’ll be sure to have the whole field covered when the Big Top opens at Cobo in January.

    Gallery: 2010 Chevy Spark

    [Source: CandianDriver]

    REPORT: GM to show Chevy Orlando-based GMC Granite and hi-po Buick Regal in Detroit originally appeared on Autoblog on Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:25:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments

  • “We’re Not Finished Yet,” Civil Society Warns

    Civil society march in Copenhagen. Credit: Claudia Ciobanu/IPS

    Civil society march in Copenhagen. Credit: Claudia Ciobanu/IPS

    By Raúl Pierri and Daniela Estrada

    COPENHAGEN (IPS/TerraViva)  COP15 proved to be a “spectacular failure even according to its own terms,” but civil society had “some successes,” such as the inclusion of certain issues on the climate agenda, and making the voice of the South heard loud and clear.

    That was how activists assessed their efforts at COP15 as the climate change talks came to an agonising end Saturday in Copenhagen.

    Barred from the Bella Center, the official venue, and treated harshly by security forces at some of the massive demonstrations held throughout the two weeks of the conference, representatives of civil society – gathered simultaneously in the Danish capital at their own people’s climate summit, Klimaforum09 – highlighted a series of victories achieved.

    “Despite the lack of transparency, civil society organisations have given visibility to positions that are more in line with climate justice, which we see as the only way to move towards a sustainable planet,” Eduardo Giesen, Latin American and Caribbean coordinator for Friends of the Earth International’s Climate Justice and Energy Programme, told TerraViva.

    “We focused our efforts on supporting developing countries so they could present a united front against the demands of the industrialised world, and not give in to pressures that in some cases bordered on colonialism,” he added.

    Klimaforum09 closed its two weeks of activities with a concert and a ceremony where this year’s organisers transferred organisational duties to representatives of Mexico and Latin America, where the next parallel summit will be held in 2010.

    “The general sensation is that what wasn’t achieved at the Bella Center was achieved at Klimaforum” in terms of content consensus and forging of alliances, Giesen said.

    For her part, Canadian journalist and researcher Naomi Klein called on activists to not give up hope. “I think it’s really important to make sure that we don’t leave this gathering feeling discouraged,” she said.

    According to Klein, the fact that negotiators at the Bella Center were unable to reach an agreement even within their own conception of how to address climate change is proof that it is a failed model.

    “That’s why it is very important to go forward and tell a different story of what happened here in Copenhagen. That story must be that their model reveals itself to be a spectacular failure even according to its own terms,” she said.

    “And because their model failed, it’s our turn now. So don’t allow yourselves to get depressed,” she added.

    In Klein’s view, the model has failed because of its emphasis on the carbon market and other market-based mechanisms.

    “Discourse about climate change has been really taken over by technocrats, (it’s become) very bureaucratised, and has been extremely exclusive. This is actually similar to the discussion on trade a decade ago, where it was all acronyms, all incredible impenetrable long talks,” she said.

    “And many people felt: I can’t be part of the discussion, I don’t have an advanced degree on economics, I can’t participate,” she added.

    Klein underlined the need to reject “the model” in which negotiations are conducted under the Convention.

    “We need to reject any measure that allows the countries that created the problem to evade their responsibility, (which is) that they need to cut their emissions,” she stressed.

    For his part, Giesen condemned international NGOs that “toe the line” of industrialised countries and back counterproductive mechanisms.

    “Our NGOs work with communities to achieve environmental justice. We haven’t turned into consultancy firms seeking to finance their activities by any means, like certain multinational NGOs who have found in the carbon market a way to make a lot of money. They’ve bought into capitalism,” he said.

    Klein, meanwhile, highlighted what she saw as the “successes” of the last two weeks. “The rich world can no longer claim not to know (what) failing to act (entails). The voices of the South, the cost of millions of lives, the disappearance of countries and cultures – all that has landed on the agenda,” she said.

    Changing the system

    “System Change – Not Climate Change,” is the title of the final statement from Klimaforum09, signed by some 360 organizations from around the world.

    Drafted months ago and discussed over the last week in the Danish capital, this “People’s Declaration” argues that “there are solutions to the climate crisis,” and puts forward six demands.

    “What people and the planet need is a just and sustainable transition of our societies to a form that will ensure the rights of life and dignity of all people and deliver a more fertile planet and more fulfilling lives to present and future generations,” it states.

    The signatory organisations called on governments to take urgent climate action, most importantly the “complete abandonment of fossil fuels within the next 30 years, which must include specific milestones for every five-year period.”

    They also demanded “an immediate cut in GHG (greenhouse gases) of industrialized countries of at least 40 percent compared to 1990 levels by 2020,” and “recognition, payment and compensation of climate debt for the overconsumption of atmospheric space and adverse effects of climate change on all affected groups and people.”

    The statement goes on to reject “purely market-oriented and technology-centred false and dangerous solutions,” such as “nuclear energy, agro-fuels, carbon capture and storage, Clean Development Mechanisms, biochar, genetically ‘climate-readied’ crops, geoengineering, and reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD).”

    The “real solutions” are “based on safe, clean, renewable, and sustainable use of natural resources, as well as transitions to food, energy, land, and water sovereignty.”

    The signatory organisations also proposed that an “equitable tax on carbon emissions” be established instead of “the regime of tradable emission quotas,” and that multilateral financial bodies like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund “be replaced by democratic and equitable institutions functioning in accordance with the United Nations Charter.”

    They also demanded a “mechanism for strict surveillance and control of the operations of TNCs (transnational corporations).”

    “Irrespective of the outcome of the Copenhagen Summit on Climate Change, there is an urgent need to build a global movement of movements dedicated to the long-term task of promoting a sustainable transition of our societies,” the statement concludes.
    (END/2009)

    Share/Save

  • Excited, but quietly so

    Hello all,

    Well, it was about three months after first dx with D, and off I went to get an A1c, full metabolic panel, blah blah blah.

    The MA put me on the scale. In three months, I had lost 30 pounds (yaay Metformin, yaaay, low-carb eating!). She was amazed, and asked how I did it. As she was finishing checking my bp (122/73) (no salt, and Lisinopril) I told her my main goal with diabetes was that I was trying to keep my feet. I then took my shoes and socks off and showed her how beautiful my feet were. Slim ankles (no water retention), not cold or hot to the touch (no circulatory troubles) and uh, shiny purple toenails (I can paint them myself now, because I have lost 30 freakin’ pounds!). I told her that I realized now how important feet were to my daily life, and I would never do anything to jeopardize them. (except maybe take up cardio kickboxing in a month or two) (did I just say that? Me? The picture of sloth and lethargy?)

    My dr came in and was also excited at my progress. Told me I may end up backing right out of this thing (her words, not mine) if I keep it up. I reminded her she was wanting to do an EKG on me, so in came the machine. Apparently, my EKG was beautiful too, so she cleared me to start a light jogging program to add to my recumbent bike and elliptical machine.

    She did put me on Simvastatin, but I waited until I could read everything I could about it before starting it. Have read the Simvastatin threads here, and I thank you all for being so smart, and so informed and so willing to share your information with the rest of us.

    Now, I just need to be patient while I see what my next A1c reading will be.

  • Showa Daibutsu: The Great Showa Buddha of Seiryūji

    Japan, Asia | Unusual Monuments

    Located in Aomori, at the Seiryūji (Blue-Green Dragon) Temple is a colossal likeness of Dainichi Nyorai completed in 1984. This particular Buddha, known primarily as Vairocana in the sanskrit, is the principal deity of the esoteric Shingon sect of Buddhism. This particular Daibutsu is the tallest seated bronze statue of the Buddha in Japan, taller even than the famous Daibutsu of Nara.

    Shingon Temples hold light ceremonies during the Bon Festival, in mid-August, to help those in a liminal state between life and death successfully transmigrate. Often, during this time, parents of a recently departed child will pray for the pacification of their own souls, and for that of the child’s. The Seiryūji Temple is no different in this respect, holding grand light ceremonies for the entirety of the Bon Festival.

  • Put Your Startup on Holiday Autopilot with Twilio

    twillio_dec09a.jpgHolidays can be a tough time for those of us with startup companies. While the rest of the world is carving turkeys, lighting Menorahs and singing carols, we’re sneaking moments away from family to check our messages. You’ve created your vacation responses, forwarded your phone to voice mail and emailed your emergency contacts to clients. But a good business person makes sure services run smoothly, even during the holidays. Twilio may be one company that can help.

    Sponsor

    Twilio is a web-service API that allows businesses to build their own customizable phones services and communications apps. Hosted on Amazon Web Services, Twilio’s infrastructure grows depending on customer demand. The company’s per-call pricing model is affordable and after watching CEO Jeff Lawson demo the service, we were surprised to see how user-friendly it truly is. At this week’sSF New Tech Event, Lawson was given 5 minutes to set up a conference call. After 10 lines of code he had a call-in number, mute settings, admin prompts and more than 50 members of the audience calling in during his live demo. After seeing the audience respond to the service, we realized that Twilio would be a great for putting your company on holiday autopilot.

    twilio_call_dec09a.jpg

    Twilio offers a variety of usages including notifications, phone polls, call forwarding, voice transcription and triaging. If a client needs a reminder during the holidays you can automate a message and pre-program it to call them on a specific date. If you want to remain available in case of an emergency, you can forward a list of pre-determined numbers to your mobile while leaving the rest in voicemail. And if you’re looking to create a simple directory, you can use Twilio to create a list of people, options or customer service contacts.

    In late September ReadWriteWeb covered Buzzeromatic’s latest Twilio-based door application. In this case, users can grant timed building access to visitors by programming the door buzzer with a password. Rather than waiting for deliveries, Twilio ensures that you’re warm at home when deliveries arrive to your building entryway.

    At this early stage, we know we’re just scratching the surface on all of Twilio’s capabilities. If you’ve hacked together a cool application or holiday game plan using Twilio or a similar service, let us know in the comments below.

    Discuss


  • In Our Hands

    Yesterday it appeared a lot had happened in Copenhagen. World leaders arrived at the Bella Centre in a flurry of convoys, and addressed the Conference of Parties and the world with aims to move forward. No sooner had they arrived and delivered their speeches, than they had disappeared again. As the dust settles the ‘Copenhagen Accord’ appears and as I read the text with no targets I realise that our future is not in their hands, but in ours.

     

    Today we will pick up the pieces our leaders couldn’t put together and tidy the mess they made and didn’t clean up. Today youth from around the world will begin the world of educating on climate change and greening the global environment. Today we will decrease carbon emissions by empowering individuals and communities around the world. Today we will educate people with logical solutions to decrease carbon emissions and dependency on fossil fuels.

     

    Am I disappointed by what was put on the table? Yes, but I am not surprised. Nor am I disheartened by it. That’s because today we will go further and make sure, top-down and bottom-up, that we will address this global challenge. We will empower everyone and, together, secure everyone’s futures.

     

    Yesterday, when a call went out to the leaders of the world to lead on tackling climate change, no-one put their hands up.

     

    Today I put my hand up.

     hands up

  • Warhammer Online 1.3.3 Developer’s Letter

    Warhammer Online’s latest Developer Letter has been released. It is Keg’s End time again in Warhammer and Release 1.3.3 has just been released. Enjoy the Warhammer Online 1.3.3 Developer’s Letter.

    (Community Team Note: We would like to take this opportunity to welcome Bruce Maclean as the new producer for Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning. Bruce has a long history with Mythic Entertainment, having previously worked on Dark Age of Camelot in multiple capacities. Please join us in welcoming Bruce.

    If you’re wondering about Jeff Skalski, not to fret as he is still here in the studio working hard on Warhammer.)

    Hail!

    Everyone here at Mythic would like to wish you a wonderful holiday season, filled with the things that make this time of year extra special – and by special we mean the taste of beer, the sounds of battle, and the sight of your enemies weeping on the forums!

    That’s right, Keg End is upon us once again, and whether you are a grizzled veteran, a raw recruit, or someone who has been following the action from the sidelines, there has never been a better time to play WAR.  Before we head off to battle seeking our own personal keg-toting servant to help us ring in the New Year, take a seat and share some brew with this grizzled old veteran for a moment as we reflect on the year now behind us.

    It truly is the Age of Reckoning and the past year has been filled with amazing Live Events, awesome new dungeons, scenarios, and new zones, with grim new foes and fantastic rewards to earn.  We have survived the Night of Murder and seen the arrival of the bitterest of rivals, the Slayer and the Choppa.  We have seen the portents and events surrounding the Rise of the Tomb Kings and the expedition to the Land of the Dead. We have witnessed the Demon Moon Rising, and partaken in the ancient and challenging Wild Hunt.

    In the past year, the Realm versus Realm war has also seen significant action and change: Zone Domination, the Keep Upgrade Ordnance systems, RvR Quartermasters, two-ramp Keeps, City Invasion improvements, a Keep Rating System, the WAR Report, and the recent Realm Underdog System.  Countless other changes too numerous to cover have also elevated the RvR experience from good to incredible, not the least of which are significant performance and stability gains.

    A toast for stability!

    While lowering the bar to enable computers to run higher graphics settings, we also improved the game’s look with HDR and bloom.  Suffice it to say, the RvR battles of this winter season are more engaging, more visceral, and more fun than anything else out there. Raise a toast to the veterans here, they know what I mean!

    Since we consider WAR to be the best-in-class RvR experience and we wanted to share it with everyone. Thus we’ve launched a Macintosh Version, brought WAR to our Russian friends, and unleashed the mighty WAAAGH! in Taiwan.  We also launched our Free Endless Trial, complete with a streaming client, so fresh meat, err, new players can play forever (for free!) and bolster the ranks of our armies.

    Here’s a toast to the fresh meat!

    Looking back at past accomplishments is all well and good, but we’re not resting on our bloodied laurels here in the land of WAR! Next year is going to be an exciting one, and I am looking forward to sharing more of our plans during the frigid days and long winter nights of January.  We’ll have exciting new Live Events, new weapons and cloaks earned by spilling the blood of your enemies in RvR, a new Scenario structure, economy and loot drop improvements, adjustments to the King and Warlord encounters to convert them to RvR-only battles, UI customization enhancements, Tier 4 RvR campaign improvements, daily quests and so much more –  and that’s just our near term plans for 2010.

    Farther into the year we’ll see…oh but you’ve heard me ramble enough! It’s time for that drink, battle, and crying enemies!

    Happy Holidays and we’ll see you on the battlefield!

    Bruce Maclean, WAR Live Producer

  • Not the end

    Munich-Churchill-Copenhagen

    It is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But at least it is the end of the beginning. – Winston Churchill, 1941

    Ah, but for a Churchill to help us tackle climate change. Sadly, not even President Obama – otherwise a master of inspirational rhetoric – could put the ‘hope’ back into ‘Hopenhagen’ as the climate talks drew to a close this weekend.

    So where do we now stand? Planet saved or world in crisis? I won’t beat around the bush – things aren’t great. The Copenhagen Accord is a weak and timid document that lacks many of the crucial details that observers were hoping for. The Danish organisers wanted this conference to be remembered as historic: it will be, but not in the way they dreamed of. Rather than a decisive summit, think Munich 1938, with Chamberlain waving his flimsy piece of paper in the face of the gathering storm of fascism. Or as this sharp cartoon has it, Versailles 1919, when world leaders sowed the seeds of an earlier global crisis.

    On the other hand, many people – myself included – invested too much hope in what Copenhagen could realistically achieve. I’ve been planning and preparing for the talks for so long (since last December, in fact) that I’ve been too keen to view it as a seminal moment, if only to get some closure. But as the dust has settled today I’ve tried to get some perspective on what’s happened. So let’s take a closer look at what has emerged after two weeks of wranglings, coffee-fuelled late nights and a lot of talking.

    First of all, what we have in the Accord is not a legally-binding agreement, nor even a political statement approved by all countries. It took Ed Miliband’s last-minute intervention this morning to get it approved as a UN document but it carries no obligation upon countries to sign up, and various Latin American and African countries are overtly hostile to doing so. The Accord sets no clear process for how to continue negotiations, and since we have now concluded COP15 without fulfilling the provisions contained in the (legally binding) Bali Roadmap, we are entering uncharted waters. The world is drifting loose.

    On the subject of targets, the Accord is most disappointing. A statement committing Annex I (developed) countries to 80% cuts by 2050 was removed at the last minute – which is bizarre, since the G8 have already agreed on this target in a previous communique. As for 2020 targets, all that the Accord contains is a blank table at the back, awaiting submissions from each country “by 31st January 2010″. This do-it-yourself, fill-in-the-blanks approach doesn’t inspire confidence after two years of talks, but at least it sets a deadline for submissions. If there’s one ray of sunshine, it perhaps suggests an early passage of the US climate bill through the Senate, in order for the US to submit proper targets.

    On finance for mitigation and adaptation, the Accord does much better. We’ve got $30bn of ‘fast-track funding’ promised yearly between 2010 and 2012, in order to kickstart work to decarbonise and build resilience in  developing countries. Good stuff, and good also that the US (again, last-minute) bought into the pledge to secure the longer-term funding target of $100bn annually by 2020. Interestingly, the Accord sets up a High Level Panel to investigate sources of funding: this could include Tobin taxes on the banking system, a levy on maritime and aviation bunker fuels, or auctioning of excess AAUs, to name a few options.

    Perhaps the most contentious issue that has hung over the Copenhagen climate talks is burden-sharing: who bears the most responsibilities for cutting emissions. Ultimately this is a standoff between the US and China, as the world’s two biggest emitters and biggest powers. China is still nominally a developing country (with plenty of poverty within its borders) but Western countries are increasingly loathe to treat it as such. The US rejected Kyoto because it didn’t bring in China, and Obama has pressed hard in Copenhagen for China to submit to international monitoring of its emissions reporting. The Chinese, for their part, continue to resist absolute emissions caps, but have set a carbon intensity target for 2020 that meets IPCC recommendations.

    The Accord includes a number of other provisions, but the most important one is the review date. Thankfully, this reached the final draft, ensuring that the agreement and international progress will be reviewed by 2015 at the latest. However, given the Accord’s limpness, this is less meaningful than it could have been. It could also be too late to do anything by then: the IPCC recommend that global emissions peak by 2015.

    So much for the slim content of the Accord. What of the process that produced it? Extraordinarily, despite two weeks of intense dialogue in Copenhagen and two years of talks preceding it, the Accord itself was thrashed out in the last two days outside of the formal UN process. The crucial meeting, according to the Guardian, was a 90-minute almost-accidental meeting between the American, Chinese, Indian and Brazilian heads of state. So much for inclusiveness: this sounds like Great Power machinations as usual. On the other hand, it’s clear that the UNFCCC system of consensual decision-making, whilst allowing small states to have a voice – such as Tuvalu – is very slow (hence Papua New Guinea’s proposal on day one to adopt decision-making by voting). Maybe we should be re-evaluating our basic approach to global governance, and moving to have a directly elected chamber for the UN. Or perhaps, as Bolivian President Evo Morales has suggested, we ought to hold a global referendum on how to tackle climate change.

    Obama has emerged from Copenhagen diminished in stature, with many former supporters feeling bitter. I was  disappointed too by Ambassador Di-Aping, the head negotiator for the G77 block whom I met at the talks, when he alleged the provisions in the Accord amounted to a new Holocaust; it was an unnecessary comparison. But our own Gordon Brown and Ed Miliband emerge from Copenhagen as the good guys. They appear to have done everything they can; let’s hope the UK can continue to lead in 2010, starting with committing unilaterally to 42% cuts by 2020, in order to encourage the rest of the EU to go to 30%.

    Most of all, Copenhagen has demonstrated the strength of civil society’s response to global warming. Just as at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, a huge panoply of NGOs and social movements gathered in the city over the past fortnight, forging closer bonds as a result of the experience. But NGOs’ exclusion from the last days of talks was frustrating and unfair. On the other hand, we can’t escape some self-criticism: the alternative summits organised by civil society, such as Klimaforum, have proven very disconnected from the UN process and more concerned with blaming governments than coming up with better solutions. And whilst I enjoyed taking part in the mid-week actions to create a ‘people’s assembly’ on the fringes of the Bella Centre, I couldn’t pretend it presented a serious challenge to the established system.

    Where next? A ‘COP-bis’, or special midway summit, has been scheduled to take place in Bonn in June 2010. If used productively, the next six months could see further details agreed upon that are missing in the current Accord. Domestically, the UK has an election scheduled to take place sometime between March-May 2010. We have some exciting ideas brewing for how to use this opportunity to push climate change up the political agenda: watch this space!

    And perhaps, instead of reaching for Churchillian rhetoric for inspiration, we should remember one of the great man’s earthier phrases. Legend has it that, during the height of the Blitz, he would end every phone call with the cryptic words ‘KBO’. When asked what it stood for, he replied: “Keep Buggering On.”

  • Ten Household Chores for Snow Days

    For some reason, an unexpected snow day doesn’t fill people with a burning desire to rehab their family rooms. They do tend to wish they had the fireplace sleeve put it, but they don’t actually do something about it. No, they tend to go play in the snow with their kids, drink tons of cocoa and then go off four wheeling with their friends. Two snow days in a row? That starts people thinking. You don’t want to bite off more than you can chew, though. When there are two feet of snow on the ground, you don’t want to have to call in reinforcements. Here are ten snow day activities you can do around your home that won’t have you calling for the plumber if you mess up the repair:

    snow day repairs

    • Check for drafts. A blustery snow day is the perfect time to find out whether windows are well caulked and to discover if the doors need weatherstripping.
    • Test how much energy different appliances are guzzling with a watt checker.
    • Change out your old light bulbs for energy efficient bulbs.
    • Organize your pantry and box up any items that you aren’t going to use that are getting near their expiration date to give to someone else.
    • Fix every squeaky door in the house.
    • Wax the edges of old fashioned drawers that don’t slide well. Tighten screws on drawers that use drawer slides.
    • Mend that pile of broken things you’ve been meaning to super glue together.
    • Repair chips in wooden furniture with wood putty or stain crayons.
    • Install that  safety bolt and a sensor on the door leading to your pool that didn’t get put up last summer. Then, hop online and buy a surface sensor to put in your pool when spring rolls around.
    • Sort out your linen closet and give old linens you don’t want anymore but are in good shape to a local charity. Put the ones that are in bad shape in your rag bin.

    Still need something to do? Pull out your bread machine if you’re running low on bread and make your own. We made some chocolate bread and are waiting for it to finish up so we can taste it. Hopefully, it tastes as good as it smells.

    Photo: K. Thomas

    Post from: Blisstree

    Ten Household Chores for Snow Days

  • Fancy a camouflage F-150? Graphics for entire Ford lineup coming soon

    Filed under: , ,

    F-150 custom graphics

    Ford Custom Graphics – Click above for high-res image gallery

    At the LA Auto Show this year, Ford showed off several North American-market Ford Fiestas. The cars themselves received a warm reception, as did the customized versions on hand to show off the possibilities. One Fiesta in particular caught our eye: It was a fairly stock-looking white car with some outrageous black graphics on its flanks. We came to learn that this wasn’t just a one-off. It was, in fact, part of a new Ford program to allow buyers to similarly customize any Ford in the vehicle lineup.

    The generically-named Ford Custom Graphics are a series of vinyls that can be used to add a little extra something to your blue oval beauty. Ford says the graphics are scratch-resistant and weatherproof, and retain the car’s 3 year, 36,000 mile warranty. They will be sold exclusively through Ford dealers. Although the Fiesta designs are the only pages open right now, there are previews of other planned graphics on the FordCustomGraphics.com website. We’ve assembled some of them here for you in the gallery below. The lower camo on the F-150 is particularly eye-catching, but there are similar treatments for every single vehicle in the Ford family brochure. Check ’em out.

    [Source: Ford]

    Fancy a camouflage F-150? Graphics for entire Ford lineup coming soon originally appeared on Autoblog on Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:21:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments

  • Intel presentara los 32 nanómetros a partir del 7 de enero

    Durante el CES (Consumer Electronics Show) 2010 a realizarce en Las Vegas, Intel presentara los nuevos Westmere de 32nm que vendría a ser una refrescada para los i5, dos nucleos mas para los i7 (alias i7 980X o i9), los nuevos i3 y los nuevos Arrandale que integran gpu en el mismo encapsulado del procesador.

    Clarkdale_desktop

    Ademas presentara otros productos relacionados con la creación de contenidos 3D, WiMax, medios y más. Todo esto lo pueden corroborar en la nota de prensa liberada por Intel.

    big_slide-1
    big_slide-2

  • Mummers Museum

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | Museums and Collections

    The first question people tend to have when they hear about the mummers museum is “what is a mummer?”

    Imagine a roving group of drunken masked revelers, demanding food, drink, and a singing match: these are mummers.

    The term “mummer” meaning a “disguised person” dates back to medieval times (and probably before, most mummery involves a mix of Christian and pagan traditions that go back to pre-Roman times) and references costumed performers of some kind, though it is unclear exactly what kind of performances mummers gave during these times. Connected with a type of folk play, the common aspect of mummery was the use of masks and elaborate disguises as well as generally rowdy performances. These “mummer plays” and associated customs spread throughout Europe gaining a slightly different tradition and meaning in each area.

    Among the many mummer traditions, there were feast mummers who provided entertainment and performed acrobatics at feasts, Newfoundland Mummers, drunken men who dressed up in extravagant drag and demanded booze, the Marshfield Mummers who paraded through town to the sound of a bell to receive donations of whiskey, Aristocratic mummery, which was a sort of English precursor to Masquerade balls, and most entertainingly, a kind of competitive Christmas carol mummery, known as “Social Mummers.” These masked groups would sing to a lord, or aristocrat, who would then be required to match them verse for verse. If he failed to do so he would have to invite the masked mummers in, and provide food and drink.

    As one can imagine, this social mummery became rather aggressive over time, with roving groups of drunken masked men performing lewd actions towards the lords who did not comply, and demanding food and more drink. Henry the Eighth even banned mummery for a while, and during this time the French masquerade ball took the over from the English mummery, at least in aristocratic circles. Later mummery was allowed again in Europe, though in 1861 in Newfoundland mummery was officially banned, after a man in St. John was murdered, allegedly by a group either disguised as, or actual mummers. The law stands, and Newfoundlander’s continue to break it each year as they perform Christmas mummery traditions.

    In the late 1600s settlers from all over Europe, particularly from Sweden, began to settle in Philadelphia, and they brought with them their traditions of mummery. One of the traditions of the Swedes, almost all of whom carried firearms with them, was to “shoot in” the New Years, something we still associate with the holiday.

    Known as the New Year’s Shooters and Mummers Association, the group would travel around during Christmas time, sing and be rewarded with food and drink. Mummery was essentially the drunker, rowdier, firearm carrying, masked, and pagan ritual infused precursor to Christmas carolers. It would be the Victorians (particularly Dickens and Washington Irving) who would transform the raucous mummers into the respectful Carolers we think of today, but not in Philadelphia. A common Philadelphia mummer chant went

    Here we stand before your door,
    As we stood the year before;
    Give us whiskey; give us gin,
    Open the door and let us in.
    Or give us something nice and hot
    Like a steaming hot bowl of pepper pot.

    In 1839, a witness wrote of men “disguised as clowns, shouting at the top of their voices and shooting guns.” By the 1870s mummery was still in full swing having become based around two groups: the Comic Clubs, and the Fancy Dress clubs. According to a local report in 1881 “parties of paraders” made the street “almost like a masked Ball.” By 1901 the mummers parade was an massive parade event and the city began officially supporting the mummers parade.

    Today mummers, and the mummers parade, is less about roving groups of revelers, and is a parade event on par with Mardi Gras (which originates from a totally different historical tradition) with over 10,000 marchers and clubs include the Wench Brigade (female mummers), comic, fancy, fancy brigade, and string band each with a different tradition of dress and performance. Unlike Mardi Gras there are no brass instruments in the Mumers parade, only strings and percussion. Many of the mummers are working class Philadelphians, but that doesn’t stop them from dressing drag, extravagant sequined body suits, or other outfits that would generally put Cher and Madonna to shame.

    This year however, the mummers parade may be in danger as the Cities financial crisis has left them without enough funds to help support the mummers. The site

  • Here’s Why The Economy Is Going To Suck Wind Next Year

    This is the season when pundits feel compelled to make annual forecasts. I will make mine, as I traditionally do, in the first letter of January. But already we have seen a wide range of forecasted outcomes. Are we going to grow at 5-6% or at 1-2% or dip back into recession? Why such disparity? I think part of the reason is a basic disagreement on the nature of the just-lapsed recession. Today we explore that issue. Then I point you to a way to help those who are desperately in need and only wish they had our problems. For those interested, I enclose a picture of my new granddaughter.

    And finally, I start the process of getting ready, after ten years, to actually buy some stocks. Yes, it is true. Am I throwing in the towel and becoming a bull, or do I just see an opportunity? Stay tuned.

    It’s All About Deleveraging

    I did a very interesting one-hour show this week with Tom Ashbrook on his National Public Radio syndicated radio show called On Point. About 20 minutes into the show, Professor Jeremy Siegel of Wharton came on, and we had a pleasant debate and lively Q and A with listeners. Jeremy of course was the bull, expecting that next year the US will grow by 5-6%. I was the “bear,” expecting growth in the 1-2% range. You can listen in at http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/12/an-economic-warning. It’s also available as a podcast on iTunes (“On Point with Tom Ashbrook”) for a few more days.

    I have liked Jeremy the times we have been on the same platform, and we have traded emails over the past few years. He is a consummate gentleman. He is also the author of Stocks for the Long Run. His thesis is buy and hold. Long-time readers know that I find such thinking to be wrong, if not dangerous. I believe that stocks go in long cycles (an average of 17 years) based on valuations, and that we are still in a long-term secular bear phase. I want to see valuations come way down before I suggest that the index-investing waters are once again safe. That day will come. Just not for a while.

    In the meantime, Jeremy has given us the reason for his very bullish call. Paraphrasing, he said, “Look at past recoveries from recessions. They were always strong in the first year. Suggesting 5-6% is not all that aggressive.”

    And I would agree with him – if the past recession was a typical recession. But we have just gone through a recession that was unlike any other we have experienced since the Great Depression. Typical recessions are inventory-adjustment recessions, caused by businesses getting too optimistic about sales and then having to adjust. You get temporarily higher levels of unemployment as inventories drop, and then you get the rebound. It is not quite as simple as that, but close enough for this letter’s purpose.

    This recession was caused not by too much inventory but by too much credit and leverage in the system. And now we are in the process of deleveraging. It is a process that is nowhere near complete. While the crisis stage is over (at least for now), there is still a lot of debt to be retired on the consumer side of the equation, and a lot of debt to be written off on the financial-system side. And this is true in Europe as well, and maybe more so; but today we will look at some data in the US.

    Total consumer debt is shrinking for the first time on 60 years. And the decline shows no sign of abating.

    jm121909image001

    Credit card companies have reduced available credit by $1.6 trillion dollars. And for good reason. My friend and London partner Niels Jensen sent me the following charts from UrbanDigs.com. Credit card delinquencies are hovering near all-time highs. Bank charge-offs for credit cards are going to rise as the unemployment numbers get worse:

    jm121909image002

    And the strain is also in the housing sector. Residential delinquencies are up 1.2% just in the last quarter, and now stand at a stunning 9%. (For whatever reason the heading did not copy, but this is residential delinquencies.)

    jm121909image003

    Frank Veneroso noticed something unusual in the latest Federal Reserve Flow of Funds report. They changed their methodology for analyzing housing prices to a model more like the Case-Shiller index, which most believe to be more accurate. That meant they deducted another $2 trillion from household net worth than in the previous quarter. They just caught up with reality, so no big news there. But there is some big news if you look closely.

    About one-third of the homes in the US have no mortgages. Typically, these are nicer homes, as the “rich” have paid off their homes. So you can estimate that to be somewhere between 35-40% of the total value of US homes. Writes Frank:

    “So now the flow of funds accounts tell us that the total value of residential real estate is $16.53 trillion. The share owned by households with a mortgage is probably $10 trillion to $11 trillion. Total mortgage household debt now stands at $10.3 trillion. In effect, for all households with a mortgage taken in the aggregate, their loan-to-value ratio is now close to 100% and perhaps close to half of them have a zero to negative equity.”

    The biggest single factor in foreclosures is negative equity coupled with unemployment. That makes sense, because if you could sell your house and get some equity, you would.

    As I have written in past letters, we are going to see a significant increase in mortgage resets in 2010, which will result in even more foreclosures. There is a lot more pain to come. This is not an environment that is typical of past recessions. There is a lot of deleveraging to be done, both as banks write off bad debts on homes and as consumers walk away from mortgages badly underwater.

    Commercial Woes

    The coming debacle in commercial real estate loans is well-documented. Total loan delinquencies at banks are rising precipitously every month, just as total loans to commercial and industrial customers are falling at an unprecedented rate, over 17% in less than two years!

    jm121909image004

    While Obama is urging banks to lend, bank regulators are telling banks to raise capital and shore up their balance sheets. One way they do that is to lend less to consumers and businesses and invest in US government bonds.

    Given the high rate of delinquencies and charge-offs of all sorts of debt, it is unlikely that we are going to see growth in loans in 2010. Further, the surveys I read suggest that consumers are working hard to reduce their debt. The New Frugal is part of the New Normal.

    Past post-recession expansions have been built on growing credit and leverage. That will not be the case this time. We are going to see reduced lending and borrowing. Even though the federal government is running massive deficits, the stimulus portion of the debt will be running down in the latter half of 2010. There will be little political will to continue with massive stimulus and deficits. While this is good in the long run, in the short run it will reduce GDP.

    All of this suggest to me that while there will be growth in 2010, it will be tepid by past post-recession standards. And with that thought, I will end my 2009 writing about the economy. When I next write in 2010, we will look at what the year may bring us.

     


     

    johnmauldin_car.jpgJohn Mauldin, Best-Selling author and recognized financial expert, is also editor of the free Thoughts From the Frontline that goes to over 1 million readers each week. For more information on John or his FREE weekly economic letter go to: http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/learnmore

    To subscribe to John Mauldin’s E-Letter please click here:
    http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/subscribe.asp

    To change your email address please click here:
    http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/change.asp

    If you would ALSO like changes applied to the Accredited Investor E- Letter, please include your old and new email address along with a note requesting the change for both e-letters and send your request to [email protected]

    Join the conversation about this story »

    See Also:

  • Copenhagen accord keeps Big Carbon in business by Christopher Booker

    Article Tags: Christopher Booker, Copenhagen Conference, Headline Story

    The Copenhagen summit achieved its main aim, to maintain the carbon-trading system established by the Kyoto Protocol.

    Image Attachment

    Heads of state: protesters at the Copenhagen world summit mask themselves as world leaders, including Australia’s Kevin Rudd, Germany’s Angela Merkel and President Obama Photo: Casper Christoffersen/EPA

    As fairy-tale snow gently descended on Copenhagen, the great global warming conference degenerated through pantomime, boredom, chaos and anger to its entirely predictable conclusion – a colossal pile of fudge with a very hard and nasty rock hidden at its centre. The “world summit” on climate change was never really going to be about saving the world from global warming at all. Even if the delegates had got all they wanted, it would no more have had any influence on emissions of CO2 – let alone on the world’s climate – than the 1997 Kyoto Protocol before it.

    Source: telegraph.co.uk

    Read in full with comments »   


  • Help Reform Computer Science Education

    Regular readers of this blog know that I’m Chairman of the National Center for Women & Information Technology.  In five years, NCWIT has become a prominent national organization helping encourage, inspire, advocate, and educate women (and girls) to get involved in computer science based on the following belief:

    “We believe that inspiring more women to choose careers in IT isn’t about parity; it’s a compelling issue of innovation, competitiveness, and workforce sustainability. In a global economy, gender diversity in IT means a larger and more competitive workforce; in a world dependent on innovation, it means the ability to design technology that is as broad and creative as the people it serves.”

    One of the disheartening things I’ve learned in the past few years from my involved in NCWIT is the abysmal state of computer science in K-12 in the United States.  It’s just awful – I’ve looked at some of the curriculum, the AP test, and some of the courseware and it’s so bad it makes me want to crawl under my desk and curl up in a ball.  Here are a few scary facts for you:

    • More than 1.6 million students took Advanced Placement (AP) exams in 2009, but barely 1% of the AP exams taken were in computer science.
    • The portion of high schools offering rigorous computer science courses fell from 40% in 2005 to 27% in 2009.
    • The U.S. Department of Labor estimates that nearly one million information technology jobs will be added to our workforce by 2016, but U.S. universities will produce only half the computing graduates needed to fill the new jobs.

    As one of its major initiatives, NCWIT is taking on reforming computer science education.  Help us out by making a tax deductable donation to NCWIT for our DC Campaign.  And help us spread the word – our friends at Google (great supporters of NCWIT) have sponsored an all expenses-paid trip to Australia to meet with the Google Wave team and have lunch in the Google Sydney office (ok – and three nights for two people) for anyone that forwards this message on.