Blog

  • Robert Pattinson “Kill Your Friends” Movie Role Could Be “Darkest Part He’s Ever Played”

    Twilight heartthrob Robert Pattinson is campaigning for the starring role in the film adaptation of the smash novel Kill Your Friends. If he bags the role, Twi-Hards will see their beloved Pattz doing drugs, sleeping with prostitutes, and committing murder as a drug and sex-obsessed record executive.

    Rob has his sights set on playing fictional record label A&R man Steven Stelfox in the big screen adaptation of the 2008 novel written by former real life A&R man John Niven.

    A movie industry tattle tells London’s The Sun newspaper: “Rob is a huge fan of the novel. He is fascinated by the music industry and is keen to get involved in the project. He’s already approached producers telling them he wants to play the leading man. If he gets the role it will be the darkest part he’s ever played. It’s an incredibly adult character and is bound to shock his fan base.”


  • Square Enix games division posts huge earnings

    Square Enix’s games division made a lot of money in the period ending March 2010, and when I say “a lot” I mean “more than a billion dollars”.

  • Aim high…or not?

    Adapted from “How High Should You Aim?”, first published in the Negotiation newsletter.

    Research shows that moderately difficult goals can energize people and increase their performance. In negotiation, parties with relatively high aspirations often negotiate higher individual payoffs. But there can be a downside: impasse and unethical behavior may be more likely.

    In a study conducted by Hannah Riley Bowles of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government and Linda C. Babcock and Lei Lai of the Heinz School of Public Policy and Management at Carnegie Mellon University, 134 participants acted as either the buyer or seller in a price negotiation. Buyers were given more ambitious or less ambitious aspirations. As expected, buyers with more ambitious aspirations negotiated better terms. Yet the sellers paired with buyers who negotiated a good price were less generous toward counterparts when allocating money in a subsequent exercise, increasing the risk of impasse.

    Recent corporate scandals suggest that goal setting can contribute to unethical behavior. Research supports this view. In one experiment, Maurice Schweitzer of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, Lisa Ordóñez of the University of Arizona’s Eller College of Management, and Bambi Douma of the University of Montana’s School of Business Administration found that when negotiators failed to achieve preset goals easily, they were much more likely to engage in unethical behavior than were negotiators who were asked simply to do their best. This effect was strongest when negotiators believed they would fall just short of their goals unless they behaved unethically.

  • Sports T&A (Topics and Arguments) with Amy. Issue 2#: NBA Free Agent Faves

    Our friend Amy has decided that Just A Guy Thing could use a different perspective every once in a while (generally: a woman’s; specifically: hers).  We have decided to oblige her cause she’s cute and, frankly, knows more about sports than almost anyone I know.  Her first piece was an indictment of baseball, available here.  This time she takes the gloves off to get dirty with some of the best free NBA free agents this summer.  And one guy who she thinks has a cute nickname (hey, she’s still a chick).  Away we go.

    I have decided to make a few promises.  Well, not promises really—more like guidelines.  I, Amy, do hereby solemnly swear that I will never steal material from Bill Simmons (Bill, congrats on your contract renewal, by the way). I will make sure to only write what I consider to be truthful things.  I will never put words, or anything else for that matter, into someone’s mouth (sorry, Keith Hernandez).  I will not lower my standards to writing about something because it is hyped-up, popular, or cool. I will no longer, under any circumstances, use any Triple Crown comments made to media by any man that weighs less than I do as justification to bet on horse racing. (Damn you, Calvin Borel.  Damn you and the horse you rode in on.)  I will not be the 1,920,243rd person to write about the NBA free agent situation.  Finally, I will not allow myself to hate myself if I break these guidelines…

    …So, that being said, let’s assess the NBA free agent situation by taking a look at a few of my personal faves in no particular order:

    Sergio Rodriguez

    Recognize this guy?

    sergio-rodriguez

    Fact:  He is a free agent.  Fact:  He is a young point guard who doesn’t have the best handles, but is said to be moldable, and a very skilled passer.  Fact:  His nickname is “Spanish Chocolate.”  Fact:  His nickname, not his basketball skills have landed him on my list of faves.

    Dirk Nowitzki

    dirk_nowitzki1

    Ah, Dirk.  Where do I begin?  I have watched Dirk play countless times.  I have been a long-time fan (five whoppin’ years).  I am invested in his future.  Well, that is a lie (damn you guidelines).  I’m really not invested in your future, Dirk.  I do love the Mavs, though.  And, I have a friend that has a Grandmother that is from your home town, so you and I are practically besties.  I watched you play three NBA playoff seasons at American Airlines Center.  I loved the way cute, little Avery Johnson looked like someone from the lollipop guild when he stood next to you.

    Okay, Dirk…Here is the moment of truth:  I secretly hoped the Mavs were going to trade you for Kobe a couple years back and then the unthinkable happened.  Worst.  Trade.  Ever.  (That was dramatic.  But in all reality, Mark Cuban, that trade did suck.  Sorry, Jason Kidd.  It’s just that every time I look at you I think wife beater and I feel like you are kind of swarmy.)  Back to the point.  I may not be 100% invested in your future, Dirk, but I am worried.  It seems you might not be the best judge of character.  Lately, Mark Cuban has done nothing to help build you a solid team. I know as a life-long Mav it might be hard for you to picture yourself in a different uni, but I feel like Dallas is played out for you.  Maybe Chicago, if they don’t make a play for Lebron?  Come to think of it, you and Derrick Rose could be magical together: his ability to get to the basket and your size, athleticism and range.  What about reuniting with Steve Nash?  The Suns may not have room for you under the salary cap, but do you really need that $21.5m/yr?  Can’t put a price on happiness.

    On the level, though, Dirk, you are getting old.  You need a ring.  It breaks my heart, but I don’t think that will happen in Dallas.  Best of luck over the next 40 (ish) days.  Here’s to hoping your basketball decisions are better than your choice in women.

    J.J. Redick

    jjredick

    While I can admit that Redick is no longer the laughing stock of the NBA, I just can’t bring myself to write about him.  Once a Blue Devil, always a Blue Devil.  J.J., work on your defense and maybe I’ll feel differently next year.  I’m sorry.

    Shaq:

    shaq

    In addition to rapper, actor, reserve police officer, and U.S. Deputy Marshall, you can add free agent to Shaq’s biography line.  He’s no spring chicken, he doesn’t play a lick of defense, and even I could take him in a game of horse if it was set from behind the free throw line, but Superman still has a strong court presence.  He still turns in pretty good numbers.  He is a fantastic partner for a young and scrappy guard.  He may not have the draw he once had, but he is still one of the most recognizable athletes in the world, (not bad for ticket and merchandise sales) and at this point in his career he can afford to be affordable.

    So where should you go, Shaq?

    Bury the hatchet.  Move back to LA.  Kobe told me to tell you he misses your musk.  Okay, he didn’t say that, but I did think you guys made a cute couple.  As it turns out, Phil, Kobe, Lamar, and Pau are fine.  They are better than fine without you.  They are focused on revenge.  I can’t believe I am saying this, but I hope they get a shot at the Celtics.  TNT would be thrilled with those ratings.   Anyhow, Shaq, you are going to continue to face ageism.  You are going to continue to be hammered by younger, quicker players (that’s what she said…giggle).  I still think you have a few great years left in you and I like watching you play.

    I am going to do you a favor and leave you with a list of people you may want to call for inspiration as you contemplate potentially playing  into your 40’s:  George Blanda, Buddy Helms, Skip Hall, Wayne Gretzky, Nolan Ryan, and, who can forget, Brett Favre.  Godspeed, Superman.

    LeBron James:

    lebron

    Hyped-up, check.  Popular, check.  Cool, debatable.  Coffin, hammer, nail– So much for my guidelines. What could I possibly say that hasn’t already been said?  Well, because we are all probably in agreement that I am not going to bring anything new to the table here, I thought I would include a letter to King James:

    To all concerned (LeBron & team):

    Can you please send me preliminary thoughts on the situation?  No.  I don’t want to know about that Jersey Shore douche bag.  I want to get inside the “think tank” of the Chosen One.  Is the Buckeye state still home for you?  What about Chicago?  I would love for you to land in Miami.  Are you going to New York?  Knicks?  Nets?  If so, do you plan to pimp “Empire State of Mind” as hard as the NFL draft did this year?  I don’t know if that’s the best decision for you, LeBron.  That song is a pretty sweet orchestral rap ballad, and New York is the biggest market, by population, for basketball, but what are you going to do with all your black and red shoes?  On that note, does Nike have to approve your decision?  Where does Phil Knight want you to go?  What does Will Wesley have to say? Bottom line, LeBron (&  team), I lost some money this weekend betting on Super Saver.  I was thinking about organizing a friendly wager on where you might land.  Do you believe in insider trading?  I know you are a “good guy” and everything, but if so, call me.  Tell Worldwide Wes I’ll cut him in.

    xoxo,

    Amy

    *Note to reader: If you are a man, consider yourself a sports fan, and are wondering who the heck Will Wesley is, this is your heads-up to hit Google stat.

    Looks like I do care about your opinion: Where do you think BronBron should go? Can we do polls? (Editor’s note: not really)

    1. Stay put.  Cleveland needs you.
    2. Miami!  D-Wade (considering he stays) and LeBron would be unstoppable.
    3. Be like Mike.  Chicago is ready for another title.
    4. Empire State of Mind. New York all the way.
    5. Who cares where the heck he goes.

    The cool thing about this is that almost every outcome is exciting.  Short of LeBron starting an “I Sold It on eBay!” store,  this is going to remain a compelling story for a while.  If he goes to a big market, you get to see Chicago or New York (Concrete jungle where dreams are made of!) rebuild their storied franchises with the bluest chip of them all.  In Cleveland, we could see if he could regain focus without all this free agency hoopla and focus on going from “Hall of Fame player” to “Greatest player ever”.  With Miami, the combination of Wade and James would likely be the most deadly since Shaq and Kobe mixed it up in their primes.  I’m pretty sure they won a championship or two.  Strangely enough, the off season is looking to provide the most compelling basketball stories we have seen in a while.

    Related posts:

    1. Sports T&A (Topics and Arguments) with Amy. Issue #1: Hernandez Sleeps
    2. A Toast to the Better Days of Shaquile O’Neal
    3. Buy A Car, Get a Free AK-47!

  • NorthScale Caches $10M in VC Funds, Gets New CEO

    NorthScale, a Memcached-focused startup based in Mountain View, Calif., says it has raised $10 million in Series B funding from Mayfield Fund. Previous investors Accel Partners and North Bridge Venture Partners also invested in this round of funding. NorthScale has so far raised a total of $15 million in two rounds of financing. Memcached is used by thousands of websites, including Wikipedia, Twitter and Flickr. It’s a “high-performance, distributed memory object caching system and it is a way to speed up dynamics web applications by alleviating the database load.”

    In addition to the new funds, NorthScale has hired a new president and CEO: Bob Wiederhold, a veteran of enterprise-focused companies including Transitive Corp. (acquired by IBM) and Cadence Design Systems. NorthScale was started by folks involved with the Memcached technology and it makes two major products: NorthScale Memcached Server and the Membase Server. It’s one of the many companies that are part of the noSQL movement.



    Alcatel-Lucent NextGen Communications Spotlight — Learn More »

  • Help With Prescription Drug Costs

    hundred dollar bill inside a pill bottleI remember picking up a prescription for my mother last year. The voice coming out of the speaker at the drive-through pharmacy said it would be “eight sixty three.” “Eight dollars?” I asked, because I was afraid that he might mean eight hundred and sixty three dollars.

    Right now I’m fortunate because nobody in my family takes prescription drugs regularly, but I know many families that are not so fortunate. $300 for a bottle of pills, $800 for a tube of ointment – prescription drugs can be shockingly expensive!

    Many times senior citizens are hardest hit with drug costs because they generally have more prescriptions and many live on fixed incomes. If you’re enrolled in the Medicare prescription drug program and having trouble making the co-payments, there is extra help available to pay for Medicare prescription drug program.

    Even if you’re not a senior citizen, assistance is out there and there may be a program to help you with your drug costs.

  • Where is the left?

    by David Roberts

    Glenn Greenwald notes the rapid, bipartisan erosion of basic civil liberties, which didn’t even hit a speed bump with the transition to the Obama administration:

    A bipartisan group from Congress sponsors legislation to strip Americans of their citizenship based on Terrorism accusations.  Barack Obama claims the right to assassinate Americans far from any battlefield and with no due process of any kind.  The Obama administration begins covertly abandoning long-standing Miranda protections for American suspects by vastly expanding what had long been a very narrow “public safety” exception, and now Eric Holder explicitly advocates legislation to codify that erosion. [etc.]

    Meanwhile, Brad DeLong notes that the last time unemployment was at 10 percent, in 1983, the country’s political class was running around like its hair was on fire. Today …

    … nobody much in DC seems to care. A decade of widening wealth inequality that has created a chattering class of reporters, pundits, and lobbyists who have no connection with mainstream America? The collapse of the union movement and thus of the political voice of America’s sellers of labor power? I don’t know what the cause is. But it does astonish me.

    Meanwhile, there was recently an oil spill that may well become the largest environmental disaster in American history. It’s ongoing. It was, it now appears, the result of lax regulation and the coziness of the oil industry with the U.S. government. And this is on the heels of a coal mine explosion that killed dozens in West Virginia. And a whole slew of bizarre weather events, one of which effectively drowned Nashville.

    And yet where are the protests? Where are the people in the streets? Where is the popular movement demanding an end to fossil-fuel addiction and promising to eject legislators who stand in its way? I don’t see it. Sure I’ve seen Facebook petitions and the odd cluster of people outside the White House waving signs, but there’s no uprising. No politician feels threatened or fears the consequences of voting against a clean energy bill.

    All these observations raise a question that’s been on my mind quite a bit lately: Where’s the left? There is a healthy elite class of politicians, journalists, and thinkers, but where’s the progressive movement? From what I can tell, there just isn’t one. There’s a decent labor lobby, a decent immigration lobby, but nothing larger than the sum of its parts.

    One of the most exciting aspects of Obama’s 2008 victory was that it seemed to herald a resurgent progressivism, organized from the ground up, at the community level, and ready to mobilize behind a set of legislative goals. Yet what has the grassroots left achieved under Obama? On what issue has it been able to command the public’s assent and drive real shifts in policy?

    Consider: The country was brought to the brink of catastrophe by eight years of Republican misrule, culminating in a huge round of corporate bailouts. Obama spent the first several months of his administration just attempting (successfully) to avoid total meltdown. Has there been a populist progressive uprising? Well, yes. But people aren’t in the streets demanding more progressive taxation, higher wages, stronger unions, and tighter regulations. They’re not, per DeLong, demanding more aggressive monetary and fiscal policy to drive unemployment down. They’re not demanding clean energy.

    No, the populist anger is coming entirely from the right, in the form of the Tea Party movement. Think about it: After all that happened in the last decade, just about the only angry people in the streets are white conservatives! It’s a stunning state of affairs.

    Where is the left to slow the descent into ever-greater inequality? To slow the inexorable rise of defense spending? To slow the erosion of civil rights? To slow the possibly irreversible degradation of the earth’s climate?

    It is true that in the U.S. system of government, the left faces unique challenges. There are few barriers to the extraordinary flow of money into politics—fewer now after Citizens United. There are choke points throughout the legislative process where a small, determined minority can grind things to a halt (the biggest one is called the Senate). America contains far more self-identified conservatives than self-identified liberals. To add to the challenge, Obama has done almost nothing to reach out to or mobilize the left. Indeed he’s let Rahm Emanuel give the base the finger numerous times.

    So yeah, the left has plenty of constraints and plenty to complain about. And complain it does. Oh how it complains! Here’s how the right works, from a Politico story on the increasingly open boasting from Republicans that they’ll retake a majority in the House in 2010:

    [T]here is a motivational strategy behind the bombast. GOP leaders call it “selling the fight.” This means convincing their colleagues, party leaders, candidates and donors that there is a real path to a Republican majority. Oregon Rep. Greg Walden, chairman of the Republican leadership, has been tapped to head this “selling the fight” program.

    “In many ways, this becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy,” said a senior GOP aide. “If you talk the talk and walk the walk, then members, donors, activists and potential candidates are going to want to join the fight.”

    This is more than bombast, it’s just an instinctive understanding of the fact that whatever they may say, people like winners. So no matter what is happening, Republicans act like they’re winning. They rarely get everything they want, but every incremental gain is trumpeted as a triumph. Check out (former Inhofe staff propagandist) Mark Morano’s blog: virtually every other post is about how the tide is turning and victory for climate-change deniers is nigh.

    It’s a message to activists and donors that their work is worth something. It’s paying dividends. They are part of something grand, inevitable, and right. That kind of affirmation is energizing and it has tangible results; no matter what befalls it, the conservative movement keeps swimming, like a shark. It’s always fighting, always pressing advantage.

    For reasons I’ve never understood, lots of folks on the left fear that celebrating victories might make people apathetic. They might think the problem is solved, and why fight if you’re not losing, right? I once asked a leader of a prominent progressive advocacy group whether he found the constant drumbeat of dissatisfaction and failure depressing and he replied, “I like uphill battles.” They energize him! I wanted to ask: How many beyond the circle of lefty activists feel that way? It’s not really a matter of speculation. Psychological research shows that the “facts” of failure are disempowering unless accompanied by a compelling and plausible alternative vision. If the situation is dire, everyone is corrupt, and nothing available is worth a spit, what is the route to success? Why bother?

    Anyway, the sad-sack nature of the left has been on my mind because, to be frank about it, I’ve been hugely disappointed by its performance on climate change. I’m going to spend some time in the coming week arguing that the left should mobilize behind the Kerry-Lieberman climate bill and go all-out to get it passed. For arguing this I will no doubt catch all manner of sh*t. But the fact is, the American Power Act is a result of the balance of power in U.S. politics. The left rejecting the bill won’t change the balance of power. Failure and status quo reinforce it. The left will change the balance of power by getting people out in the streets, writing their legislators, and voting for/against candidates based on their climate vision in sufficient numbers to pose a threat.

    There’s no sign that’s happening now, but perhaps it will. Does it make sense to postpone legislation while we wait?

    Related Links:

    The Yes Men send an intern to the Bolivia Climate Summit

    How environmental groups are protesting the oil spill

    Al Gore, Bill McKibben and the urgency of now






  • The Declining Value Of Work

    Via Prison Planet.com » Commentary

    The Economic Collapse
    May 18, 2010

    One of the great joys that men in free societies have long enjoyed is the ability to earn an honest wage for an honest day of work.  In particular, the amazing capitalist engine that powered the U.S. economy for decade after decade greatly rewarded the incredible hard work and industriousness of the American people.  America was known as the land of opportunity, and we built the largest middle class in the history of the world by working incredibly hard.  But today, all of that is fundamentally changing.  Thanks to rapid advances in technology, and thanks to the globalization of the work force, the labor of American workers is rapidly losing value.  Automation, robotics and computers have made many jobs obsolete.  Today one man can do the work that a hundred men used to do.  Not only that, but today American workers literally have to compete against workers from all over the globe.  Global corporations often find themselves having to choose whether to build a factory in the United States or in the third world.  But in the third world workers often earn less than 10% of what American workers earn, corporations are often not required to provide any benefits to workers, and there are usually hardly any oppressive government regulations.  How can American workers compete against that?

    The truth is that labor is now a global commodity.  How can an American worker compete against a desperate, half-starving worker in the third world that will work like mad for a dollar an hour?

    But this is what we get for letting the politicians push “free trade” down our throats.

    Most American workers had no idea that free trade would mean that they would suddenly be competing for jobs against workers in the Philippines and Malaysia.

    But that is the cold, hard reality of globalism.

    All of this free trade has been very hard on American workers as factory after factory has closed, but it has allowed the big corporations to get exceedingly wealthy.

    The top executives at the big global corporations are certainly enjoying all of this free trade.  Their salaries have soared.

    In 1950, the ratio of the average executive’s paycheck to the average worker’s paycheck was about 30 to 1.  Since the year 2000, that ratio has ranged between 300 to 500 to one.

    The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer.

    That is what globalism is all about.

    The elite make out like bandits as they exploit third world labor pools, while the American middle class finds itself slowly being crushed out of existence.

    The Declining Value Of Work 100210banner1

    According to the United Nations Gini Coefficient (which measures distribution of income), the United States has the highest level of inequality of all of the highly industrialized nations.

    Increasingly, all of the rewards are going to those at the top, while the vast majority of Americans are left wondering why things just don’t seem to work out for them.

    According to economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, two-thirds of income increases between 2002 and 2007 went to the wealthiest 1% of Americans.

    Life is good if you are in the top one percent.

    Unfortunately, that does not include any of us.

    Instead, the American middle class is gradually being pushed into lower paying service jobs.  But it is really hard to feed a family by cutting hair or by greeting the folks who come walking into the local Wal-Mart.

    If you talk to many Americans, they just can’t seem to figure out why they can’t make things work out even though they are working as hard as they can.  Millions of Americans have found themselves taking on second (and in many cases third) jobs in an attempt to provide for their families.

    But what they don’t understand is that the global elite have turned labor into a globalized commodity.

    American workers are not faced with a level playing field.  Just check out some of the pay levels around the world that American workers must compete against….

    In Bangladesh, a garment worker makes 22 cents an hour. The wage in Cambodia is 33 cents an hour; in Pakistan, 37 cents an hour; in Vietnam, 38 cents; in Sri Lanka, 43 cents; Indonesia, 44 cents; India, 55 cents; China, 86 cents; the Philippines, $1.07; and Malaysia, $1.18.

    Do any of you want to work for $1.18 an hour with no benefits?

    But that is your competition.

    Wages are being driven down and big global corporations are loving it.

    This isn’t capitalism.

    This is the global elite pushing us into a cruel system of economic slavery where they control all of the wealth and the rest of us struggle to survive as we work our tails off for them.

    Already we are seeing large numbers of Americans becoming absolutely desperate to get even a low paying job.

    For example, over one three day period, approximately 10,000 people showed up to apply for 90 jobs making washing machines in Kentucky for $27,000 a year.

    Can your family live on $27,000 a year?

    But that is considered a good wage now.

    Actually, the folks who are making really good wages now are those who work for the U.S. government.

    Yes, life is good if you are a servant of the system.

    Today, the average federal worker now earns about twice as much as the average worker in the private sector.

    Of course government employees basically produce next to nothing except red tape.

    The U.S. government doesn’t seem to care if they are productive or not.  They just keep borrowing more money and getting us into even more financial trouble.

    But at least there is somewhere for middle class families to get decent jobs.

    In fact, it is getting really hard to live a middle class lifestyle in America without relying on the government in some way.

    The truth is that good jobs are becoming increasingly scarce.

    That is why it is absolutely imperative for all of us to try to become as independent as possible.

    That means getting out of debt.

    That means starting our own businesses.

    That means learning how to grow a garden.

    Many of those who continue to blindly rely on the system to provide them with a “job” (“just over broke”) will end up bitterly disappointed in the end.

    Millions of Americans have already lost their jobs and millions more Americans will lose their jobs as we move along through the next few years.

    In fact, with all of the amazing advances in technology that we have seen over the past couple of decades, the global elite are starting to realize that they really don’t need 6 billion workers after all.

    Instead, those among the global elite are increasingly viewing all of us as a burden.  They openly ask why they should have to take care of so many “useless eaters”.  After all, if the system does not need all of us to keep functioning, then what good are we to them?

    So these days you are starting to hear a lot about the dangers of “overpopulation” and the need to control population growth.

    In fact, just over one year ago Bill Gates, David Rockefeller, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey and other very wealthy power brokers held a clandestine meeting in New York.

    So what was the topic?

    Population control.

    One anonymous attendee of the meeting was quoted in a U.K. newspaper as saying that overpopulation “is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers.”

    Are you starting to get the idea?

    Instead of being viewed as valuable workers, now we are being viewed by the elite as pests that have multiplied to the point where we are now out of control.

    What a strange world we live in now.

    We need to get back to the America where good workers are valued and where hard work is rewarded.

    We need to get back to the America where having a large middle class is an important national goal.

    We need to get back to the America where we build American businesses, where we hire American workers and where we buy American products.

    But unless the American people wake up, American workers are going to continue to be devalued.

    Are we actually going to sit back and let American living standards decline to third world standards?

    It is up to this generation to reject globalism and to reclaim the great free enterprise principles that this nation was founded on.

    If someday our children and grandchildren exist in a world where they are considered just another part of the third world labor pool they will know who to blame.

  • Scientist: Global Cooling is the Real Crisis

    Via Prison Planet.com » Sci Tech

    Jeff Poor
    Business & Media Institute
    Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

    Most of us have heard or seen what global warming alarmists say the consequences will be if something isn’t done to limit the man’s impact on the environment. Al Gore, in his movie “An Inconvenient Truth,” warns global sea levels will rise by a whopping 20 feet, causing coastal flooding and creating a refugee crisis. Others aren’t quite as gloomy, but that’s not the real threat to the planet.

    At the Heartland Institute’s International Conference on Climate Change on May 17, Professor Don Easterbrook of Western Washington University warned that the climate is headed for a period of cooling. He told the Chicago gathering of hundreds of scientists and policy professionals that there are three possibilities of cooling, examples of which we’ve seen within the last 200 years.

    “I think that there’s three possibilities that we’re headed for,” Easterbrook said. “One is cooling similar to 1945-1977 – about a half degree. Not really all that bad. Perhaps something similar to the cold period of 1880-1915, to perhaps the Dalton Minimum, which would be even colder. And which of these happens, it remains to be seen.”

    Scientist: Global Cooling is the Real Crisis  260310banner2

    The Dalton Minimum, named after the English meteorologist John Dalton, was a period of low solar activity lasting from about 1790 to 1830 that resulted in a two-degree drop in global temperature.

    Easterbrook explained that any significant drop – from a half-degree to two degrees – would have a much worse impact on human civilization than global warming.

    “Impacts of global cooling are unfortunately worse than they are for global warming,” Easterbrook said. “The good news is that global warming is over for several decades. The bad news is that its going to be worse than global warming would have been because twice as many people are killed by extreme cold than extreme heat. We’ll have a decrease in food production. It’s already happening in various parts of the world.”

    And just as global warming alarmists suggest the poor will be hit the hardest, so would the poor when it comes to a global cooling phenomenon.

    “Hardest hit will be third world countries where millions are now near the starvation level. We will have an increase in per capita energy demands – people will want to keep warm and a decrease in the ability to cope with a population explosion, which is happening and is scheduled to increase the population of the world by 50 percent in the next 40 years.”

    And Easterbrook advised those in attendance not to be too narrow-minded, but instead rely on the actual science.

    “So my conclusion is then that, keep an open mind, let the data speak for itself, and my hypothesis is provable, it’s testable with time,” Easterbrook said. “So if I live long enough, I hope to see whether my prediction is right.”

  • Rima Fakih pole dancing photos released

    Rima Fakih pole dancing photos released
    Controversy haunts the newly crowned Miss America, Rima Fakih with the emergence of photos in which she is stripping.

    Rima Fakih, the girl with Arab roots on Sunday won the Miss USA crown, became the sensation of the moment not only for her recent crown, but also as a champion of pole dancing.

    In 2007, the model and economist, 24 years old epresentative of Michigan, was champion in the competition “Stripper 101″, promoted by Detroit’s radio show, “Mojo in the Morning.”

    Fakih although has not completely undressed, one of the pictures show that she stuffed her bra with dollar bills, an activity usually seen during a stripping show.

    After her victory, Rima won precious jewelry, gift cards and nothing more and nothing less, than a stripper pole.


    Rima Fakih pole dancing pictures.

    No related posts.

  • Fossil Energy Reduction on Farm

    What this article reveals is that it is possible to maintain yields while lowering fuel and chemical fertilizer inputs through changing crop rotations closer to the traditional cattle based rotations in use before industrial farming became dominant.
    I will add once again that the real revolution will begin when we begin to augment soils with biochar derived from corn stover.  I have beat this horse pretty regularly, and long time readers will be weary, but the power of elemental carbon is to sequester nutrients until needed and collapsing the use of chemical nutrients.  I would expect to maintain two corn crops with biochar in a four year cycle.
    However, this is still very encouraging.  An obvious move may also be to operate a corn-soy-soy crop cycle as a transition aimed at lowering input costs.
    Cattle husbandry still belongs integrated with corn and alfalfa cropping for optimizing the end product.  Make it all natural and we have premium beef to sell.
    Anyway, energy costs are slowly impacting these economics and this trend is unlikely to reverse.
    Reducing Fossil Energy Use On The Farm
    by Staff Writers

    Madison WI (SPX) May 05, 2010

    Conventional agriculture production relies heavily on fossil fuels, particularly in its ability to provide energy at a low cost. However, the uncertain future of fossil fuel availability and prices point to need to explore energy efficiencies in other cropping systems.

    Most of the U.S. Corn Belt relies on a two-year rotation of corn and soybean with heavy inputs of fertilizer, herbicides and pesticides derived from fossil fuels to achieve high yields keep costs low.
    Matt Liebman, Michael Cruse, and their colleagues at Iowa State University conducted a six-year study to compare energy use of a conventionally managed corn and soybean system with two low input cropping systems that use more diverse crops and manure applications, but also use less fertilizer and herbicides. The results were published in the May/June 2010 edition of Agronomy Journal, published by the American Society of Agronomy.

    The two input systems consisted of a three-year rotation of corn-soybean/small grain/red clover and a four-year rotation of corn-soybean-small grain/alfalfa-alfalfa. Between 2003 and 2008, nitrogen fertilizer inputs in the 3-year rotation decreased 66% and decreased 78% in the 4-year rotation.

    Herbicide use decreased 80% in the three-year rotation and 85% in the four-year rotation. Despite the energy input reduction, corn and soybean yields matched or exceeded the conventional system yields.
    Did the application of manure decrease the fossil fuel energy costs? Manure prices are dependent on local economic conditions, but the two low-input systems used 23% to 56% less fossil energy than conventional systems. To analyze the energy and economic costs of manure application, the researchers used two approaches. One where manure was a waste product of live stock and essentially free of cost except for the energy used in its application, and a second approach as if the costs of manure were the same as commercial fertilizers. As a low economic input, manure can return $249 per acre, or $28 to $38 under high economic input for four and three-year systems, respectively.

    Most of the fossil energy input for all systems was from grain drying and handling. Conditions in northern latitudes, where farmers have limited time to allow grain to dry in the field, make it difficult to reduce this cost. The researchers point out, however, that growing corn less frequently in a rotation sequence can reduce the need for grain drying with fossil energy.

    The three and four-year rotation plans rely on agriculture systems where livestock feeding, manure application are integrated into crop production practices. “Iowa has a long history of mixed crop and livestock farming, although these operations do require more management and labor,” said Liebman. “If fossil energy costs rise steeply, we may see more of them again.”

    While fossil energy inputs may decrease with manure application and increased crop rotation, the opposite trend is true for labor inputs. A two-year rotation required 41 minutes per acre per year, with a three-year rotation increasing labor 54%, and a four-year rotation requiring 91% more labor. However, the increases in labor were mainly in parts of the year not associated with corn or soybean production activities.

    The researchers conclude that low energy prices and high wages contributed to the adoption of the conventional two-year corn/soybean rotation. Fossil fuels offset labor costs and allow net economic returns to remain constant. If demand from ethanol or overseas grain markets increase, or if biofuels from corn stover become economically viable, Midwest cropping systems may continue on a trend of less diversity and more corn. However, if fossil energy prices rise without an increase in crop value, diversified cropping systems may become more preferable.

    “It’s hard to predict the exact details of what the future will bring us,” said Liebman. “But results of this study show that we do have options for maintaining high farm productivity and profitability while substantially reducing our dependence on fossil energy.”
  • The green bench that grows plants, generates energy and lights up with solar power

    eco-benches-1.jpg
    Eco-benches get a facelift with the eyebrow-raising attention-pulling bench. Designed by Steven Ma, this bench not only rests your tired legs, but also works as a street light, a power generator and helps the environment a bit, by growing plants. The circular shaped bench is made entirely out of recycled materials, making it a shade greener.

    Known as the e-Co Bench, this green resting spot is made from bio-aluminum – a material recycled from redundant aircrafts – and glass. This enables the bench to be further recycled while disposing off. The bench also captures its own water to feed the plants it grows, with the top boasting integrated solar cells during the day. The energy captured is used to spark up the four lighting channels. We sure would love to see some of these in our parks and on side-walks.

    eco-benches-2.jpg

    eco-benches-3.jpg

    eco-benches-4.jpg

    [Treehugger]

  • Land Rover confirms 2WD for compact Range Rover, diesel hybrid coming in 2012

    Land Rover LRX Concept

    Land Rover has officially confirmed that it will introduce a 2WD option in addition to the 4WD derivative of its new compact Range Rover, also known as the LRX. The 2WD model will go on sale in 2011 along side the 4WD model and will emit less than 130g/km of CO2, making it the lightest, most fuel-efficient Range Rover ever produced.

    “This is good news for the company and for our customers,” said Phil Popham, Land Rover managing director. “A 2WD option is just one way in which we are developing our vehicles efficiency whilst adding to the Land Rover range and expanding our customer base. We will continue to make the ‘world’s finest all-terrain vehicles’ for those customers who require 4WD but will also now offer an alternative to those that don’t.”

    Click here to get prices on the 2010 Range Rover.

    Land Rover also confirmed that it is working on hybrid technology for larger vehicles in its range. “The first diesel hybrid will be available in 2012 and on the road in 2013,” Land Rover said in a statement.

    It said that by the end of 2010 the company will be testing the first diesel hybrid prototype called ‘range_e’ which is currently being developed using the Range Rover Sport platform. The test vehicles will use the existing 3.0L TDV6 diesel engine mated to a ZF 8-speed automatic. Land Rover said that the goal is to achieve a range of 20 miles using electric power only emitting less than 100 g/km of CO2 emissions and to achieve a top speed of around 120mph.

    Jaguar Land Rover has committed to investing £800 million in developing environmental technologies and remains committed to developing vehicles with sustainable features.

    – By: Omar Rana


  • Solar powered battery charger with 29 different adapters to power up you devices

    Solar-powered-battery-charger-1.jpg
    A lot of us spend a good part of our income on electronics, those little devices that help us communicate, entertain ourselves and are ever handy, making our lives easier. But these little devices need to be charged up too. So, we end up with a box-full of different chargers, to power them up, which also means, an increased usage of electricity form the grid.

    Well, you don’t need to rely on the grid anymore to power up your devices, the sun’s ready to help using this solar powered battery charger. It also comes packed with 29 different adapters, ready for use. The 20,000mAh battery can power up your laptop, with 19 adapters dedicated to different laptop types, using the sun. 14 adapters for cameras, phones and the PSP keep your devices charged up. Using solar power, charging time extends to 8 to 10 hours, while an AC adapter takes just 3 hours. Hook up you devices to this charger for just $148.

    [Akihabaranews]

  • Obama revamped book deal; “Dreams From My Father” youth edition in the works

    WASHINGTON — Bo, the Portuguese water dog, was a priceless addition to the first family, a gift from the late Sen. Ted Kennedy and his wife, Victoria. Bo’s value, according to the Obama’s latest financial disclosure form, released on Monday, was $1,600.

    Bo’s worth, the White House said, was determined by his breeder. Much of the financial picture of President Obama and first lady Michelle is known from their tax returns and prior disclosure statements. Obama signed his new statement on Friday, with details from January-December 2009. Among them:

    • Last year, Obama recast his book deal with Crown Publishing; the original agreement dates to December 2004, after he was elected senator from Illinois but before he took office.

    Under the new arrangement, Obama will not owe his publisher a nonfiction book — or any future works — while he is president. Obama’s original deal called for him to write two nonfiction books and a children’s book. Obama delivered one of the books, The Audacity of Hope.

    • Also last year, Obama agreed to a deal with Crown in which one of its divisions, Random House Books, will published an edition of his memoir, Dreams From My Father, suitable for middle-grade or young adult readers. In 2009, Obama received a $225,000 payment, part of a previously disclosed $500,000 advance.

    This youth book was proposed in 2008. Last year, Obama received royalties of more than $1 million for each of his best-selling books.

    • The Obamas still keep a checking account at Chicago-based Northern Trust, though less than $1,000 was in it.

    • At retirement, Obama will be able to draw a pension from his days as an Illinois state senator because he paid into the plan when he served.

    • In 2009, Michelle Obama received a payment of an unknown amount from the University of Chicago Hospitals, her final deferred compensation distribution. She is not obliged to disclose her financial information.

  • Demo: Tiger Woods PGA TOUR 11

     

    Product DetailsContent: Tiger Woods PGA TOUR 11 Demo
    Price: Free
    Availability: All Xbox live regions
    Dash Text: Lead your team to glory with Tiger Woods PGA TOUR 11. Fight for honor, fight for country in the all-new Ryder Cup Challenge on the spectacular Twenty Ten Course at The Celtic Manor Resort, home to the 2010 Ryder Cup. Create your own team and take on others in 12 vs 12 online team play. Strategize and focus your game as you feel the intensity of the PGA TOUR season and explore the all new True Aim mode as you play from the perspective of a real-life pro.

     

    Add the Tiger Woods PGA TOUR 11 Demo to your Xbox 306 download queue

     

    Like the demo? Purchase the full game.

     

  • Joomla 1.6 Beta Is Here

    The popular content-management system Joomla is getting ready for a big update. The Joomla 1.6 Beta has been released bringing with it a number of new features and plenty of smaller updates. Developers can get started testing the upcoming release, but the update is not intended for stable production environments.

    “The release of Joomla 1.6 will raise … (read more)

  • Demi Moore Shopping Memoir

    Demi Moore’s got a story to tell — and she hopes to do it on the pages of an upcoming memoir.

    On Monday, Moore’s agent, Luke Janklow, confirmed that the Ghost actress is working on her autobiography and has been meeting with publishers in New York City in hopes of selling the effort for public consumption.


  • Google set for probes on data harvesting

    Via Prison Planet.com » Prison Planet

    Joseph Menn, Daniel Schäfer and Tim Bradshaw
    Financial Times
    Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

    Authorities on both sides of the Atlantic on Monday moved towards investigating Google following the internet group’s disclosure that it had recorded communications sent over unsecured wireless networks in people’s homes.

    Peter Schaar, the German commissioner for data protection, called for a “detailed probe” by independent authorities into the practice by Google.

    He said the group’s explanation of the collection of data as an accident was “highly unusual”.

    “One of the largest companies in the world, the market leader on the internet, simply disobeyed normal rules in the development and usage of software,” he said.

    In the US, the Federal Trade Commission was expected to launch an inquiry as well, according to people who spoke to agency officials.

    Full article here

    Google set for probes on data harvesting  100210banner1