Blog

  • Arrest made in string of UCLA sexual assaults

    Ucla UCLA police have detained a suspect in connection with a string of sexual assaults on students in recent weeks, authorities said Tuesday.

    The arrest comes after authorities released a sketch Monday of a man they believe is responsible for five sexual assaults from March 8 to April 6 on students on or near campus, said Sgt. Robert DeFrancesco of the UCLA Police Department.

    The attacker appears to have a pattern of targeting women who are using their cellphones or distracted in some way, according to police. 

    Further information was not immediately available.

    –Tony Barboza

    Photo: Sketch of the suspect. Credit: UCLA Police Department.

  • Serial burglar arrested for allegedly prowling a downtown L.A. loft

    Los Angeles detectives have arrested a serial burglar seen on surveillance video prowling a downtown Los Angeles loft with a woman, authorities said Tuesday.

    Tommie Scott, 50, was arrested in connection with the March 31 crime at the Biscuit Company Lofts after he was detained by sheriff’s deputies investigating a lead on another crime — that he possessed stolen Chinese coins.

    The deputies stopped him April 2 near Central Avenue and Gage Street and found the rare coins in his pocket, along with a cellphone. Deputies Sean Shaw and Mark King suspected the phone had been stolen and called numbers on it until they located the owner, a downtown restaurateur whose phone had been stolen March 31 from a back office, said Lt. Paul Vernon of the Los Angeles Police Department.

    The deputies urged the restaurateur to file a crime report with the LAPD. When he did, Det. Kyle Remolino called Shaw and realized that the suspect’s description matched the man they were looking for. He asked about the copper-colored Avalanche seen at the lofts on surveillance video, and the deputies said they were looking at the sport-utility vehicle as Remolino described it over the phone.

    “We got more than we ever expected on this case, thanks to the work of deputies Shaw and King,” Vernon said. “We will clear the attempted burglary at the lofts and the theft from the restaurant, and maybe a few more.”

    LAPD detectives planned to interview the 35-year-old woman seen in the video with Scott, but they did not expect to file any charges against her. Vernon said Scott is a prolific burglar who was on parole for burglary when the deputies arrested him for receiving stolen property.

    Because he was on parole, he was being held without bail.

    “Scott was more of an office creeper than a cat burglar,” Vernon said. “He’d walk into open businesses and steal whatever he could get his hands on. If fact, he mistook the lofts for business suites.”

    — Richard Winton

  • Everybody poops…for a price

    by Jen Harper

    While it’s true that an airplane bathroom isn’t necessarily anyone’s
    idea of a five-star restroom experience, it does come as a welcome relief 30,000
    feet above the ground after two in-flight club sodas. So imagine your surprise
    when, after scrambling over your fellow passengers and down the narrow aisle with
    a full bladder, there’s a flight attendant there with an outstretched hand, not
    to somehow assist you with your bathroom experience (you’ve been doing it quite
    well for years now all by yourself), but to collect the toilet tax. Yep, that’ll
    be one euro to use the airplane bathroom if you’re flying Ryanair, an Irish
    airline with routes across Europe and Morocco. No cash on hand? Sorry, you’re
    SOL—perhaps literally.

    The airline, which also announced a “standing room only”
    section for its planes last summer to fit more passengers on board, is reducing
    the number of toilets on the plane to one to make more room for seats. And,
    indeed, the eco-savvy set already knows that using the bathroom at the airport
    is more environmentally friendly than the airplane potty (every flush in the plane’s
    lavatory uses enough fuel to run a car for six miles, since airplanes use
    powered vacuums instead of gravity to flush), but coin-op loos? Come on.

    Seriously, though, here’s the best part of this
    story
    :

    “The whole idea of making people pay for a bodily
    function is crazy. There are easier ways to make an extra euro,” says Steven Soifer, a professor at the University of Maryland School of Social Work and co-founder of the American Restroom Association and Shy Bladder Center.

    Yes, there’s an American Restroom Association and Shy
    Bladder Center. And yes, I’m 8 years old.

    ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

    Like what you see? Sign up to receive The Grist List, our email roundup of pun-usual green news just like this, sent out every Friday.

    Related Links:

    Insane posse of climate deniers?

    Wal-Mart stores are littered with wasteful products this month

    Smokers to get their greenbutts in gear with compostable cigarettes






  • Who Has Dumber Fans, Ashton Kutcher or Justin Bieber? Math Reveals the Answer… | Discoblog

    Picture-111Since Twitter blew up into the mainstream last year, it’s become rife with teenybopper types who join the microblogging service just to follow their favorite airheaded celebrities. Which raises the question: Which airheaded celebrity has the, uh, most unsophisticated teenybopper followers?

    Comedian and geek Tom Scott got his creative juices cranking to create Stupid Fight–a website that lets you compare whose Twitter followers are dumber. This is great, in case you’ve ever wondered what sort of a person would follow actor Ashton Kutcher or all-around diva Kim Kardashian and try to send them messages.

    Scott proclaims on his website:

    FACT: A lot of people on Twitter are stupid. Many of these people follow celebrities and try to send them messages. But which celebrity’s fans are most stupid? It’s time to find out.

    The idea itself is pretty simple. Scott explains:

    Stupid Fight can’t go out and administer an intelligence test to each person that’s sending messages to a celebrity. So instead, it estimates based on several stupid indicators. Are they using twenty exclamation marks in a row? Do they endlessly use the abbreviation ‘OMG’? Do they seem incapable of working out where their Shift key is? These indicators have a strong correlation with the message, and its sender, being stupid.

    Just go to the site, plug in the names of two people you want to compare and bam! The indicator tells you whose followers are dumber. Of course, the caveat is that this is not a scientific process and Scott himself says, it’s a lot like calculating your Body Mass Index: It works perfectly for some and not at all for a few others.

    So, when we plugged in Glenn Beck to compare his followers with Rachel Maddow’s, here’s what we found.

    Related Content:
    Discoblog:Introducing the Twettle: The Tea Kettle That Tweets
    Discoblog:The Best Way to Predict Box Office Hits: Twitter Chatter
    Discoblog: Your Plants Have More Twitter Followers Than You—Literally
    Discoblog: New Device Aims to Read Your Dog’s Mind—and Broadcast It on Twitter
    Discoblog: How To Make Your Twitter Followers Uneasy: Use ShadyURLs

    Image: Stupid Fight


  • Apologizing like a human, not a corporation

    David Christiansen, Founder of TroopTrack, sent us an email about apologizing well:

    Over the weekend I broke the single sign on integration between my SaaS boy scout troop management software and ZenDesk, my help desk. It was broken for three days while I was sick, working on my regular job, and trying to enjoy some portion of Easter. I got about 30 emails from exception notifier, letting me know how my mistake was impacting users.

    This morning I read your chapter on how to say you’re sorry. I already knew I needed to apologize, but it helped me to be human about it rather than corporate. Here’s what I sent:

    Over the weekend I attempted to improve the single-sign-on feature between TroopTrack.com and TroopTrack Help Desk. Sadly, I didn’t do it right and caused two problems:
    1) A brief outage over the weekend that impacted some of you.
    2) Many of you are now unable to access the help desk.

    The first problem was fixed within a few minutes, but it was still a pain for those of you who were online when it happened. I’m sorry about that.

    I’m still working on the second problem. Hopefully it will be fixed soon. In the meantime, if you are having trouble accessing the help desk and need support, please email me directly or call me.

    Thanks for understanding. Software is hard – I learn something new every day. Unfortunately sometimes I’m learning from my mistakes!

    I appreciate the reminder REWORK gave me this morning to be myself.

    Also, there was discussion in our Campfire room about how well done this was: Atlassian update on a security breach.

    In summary — we’ve made mistakes, we’re sorry and we’re fixing them — and we’re going to be honest about what those mistakes are. Half of being a reliable and trustworthy vendor from a security perspective is the technical bits, and even though we erred here, we ultimately pride ourselves on how we handle security. The other half is being open and honest, which we’ll never fail at.

    Related SvN posts on apologizing:
    Hulu CEO: “We screwed up royally”
    The bullshit of outage language
    The goal is to apologize sincerely and be taken seriously
    ThinkGeek: “We’d never get away with taking advantage of you guys, so why would we try?”
    How to S.A.V.E. Customer Service

  • Google Buzz Adds Button for Publishers (Including GigaOM)

    Google launched a new feature for Google Buzz today that makes it easier for web site publishers — including GigaOM — to add a button to their content so that users can directly share it on the Gmail-based social network. We and others came up with a way to do the same thing after the service first launched in February, but it was a kind of a hack, which involved using Google Reader as a way to funnel the blog post through to Buzz. Not only was it a workaround, but it didn’t work for people without Google Reader accounts. Now there’s an official way to do the same thing, and GigaOM is one of the first sites to implement it, along with a number of other publishers including The Washington Post, YouTube and The Huffington Post.

    Google Buzz has gotten its share of criticisms since it launched in February, including those centered around privacy concerns — which the service quickly responded to with a series of changes — and some complaints (including some from me) that it was confusing and difficult to use. And it’s not clear how much the service has been growing, since Google hasn’t provided any numbers after saying “millions of users” had tried it out following the launch. Even the Google Buzz team doesn’t seem to have been using it that much lately.

    However, part of the reason why people haven’t been using the service more could be that it hasn’t been that easy to post content, something Google has acknowledged in its blog post about the new buttons. Hopefully this new feature will simplify the process, and help readers share content — including ours. If you want to add a Google Buzz button to your own site, you can grab the code to do that here.

  • Wrong way planets screw up our perfectly good theories | Bad Astronomy

    Stupid reality, always mucking about with our ideas. How dare it!

    In this case, reality is interfering with how we think planets form around stars. And the monkey in the wrench belongs to a handful of newly discovered planets that go around their stars the wrong way.

    wrongwayplanet

    That’s an artist’s illustration of one of these planets. As you can see in the diagram, the star rotates left-to-right, but the planet orbits right-to-left. That’s a bit of a puzzler, and here’s why.

    First, how do we think planets form? If you look at my last post, you’ll see a giant cloud of gas and dust collapsing in places to form stars. The stars form from little knots of overdense regions in the cloud. As the material collapses, any slight amount of rotation it has — from eddies and vortices in the gas, say — get amplified (think ice skater as she draws her arms in and spins faster). Random collisions of particles inside the cloud tend to drop more of the matter toward the center, along the equator of the spin, forming a flat disk there.

    The disk spins, rotating around its center like a DVD (though stuff toward the center goes around faster than stuff near the outer edge). The middle of the disk is where the star forms. Farther out, local eddies and vortices can form planets. But the important thing to note is that in this scenario, everything spins in the same way. If the disk appears to be spinning clockwise, say, then the star will spin that same way, the planets will orbit that same way, and the planets will spin that same way. We’re pretty sure this is how things work because that’s pretty much what’s happening in our own solar system.

    This theory has been tested by observation and by increasingly complex modeling. Sometimes there are problems with it, but in general new ideas have been added that fix those problems, and over time we’ve been pretty happy overall with the idea that stars and planets form this way.

    However, a bunch of newly discovered planets have messed this nice idea up. They orbit their stars the wrong way!

    How do we know? That part is pretty cool. First, these are transiting planets. As the illustration above shows, from our point of view the planets pass directly in front of their stars every time they make an orbit. When that happens, they block a fraction (usually around 1%) of the star, and we see that as a slight dip in the light detected from the star. A lot of planets have been found this way, and it’s a pretty good method of finding planets.

    Now picture the star in the image above. It’s spinning, so the left side of the star in the diagram appears to be headed toward us, and the right side moving away from us. But that means there’s a Doppler shift, a slight change in the color of the light from the star. Just like a car roaring past you makes that “EEEEEEeoooooooow!” sound, light changes pitch if the source is moving toward or away from us, and that change in pitch is seen as a shift in color.

    The light from the part of the star rotating toward us shifts a bit to the blue, and the side moving away shifts a bit to the red. That shift is very small, but measurable.

    But the planet messes that up. As it transits (moves in front of) the star, it blocks first one side, and then the other. If it orbits the star in the same direction as the star spins, it will first block the blueshifted side, and then a bit later the redshifted side. That change in the starlight can be seen and measured.

    But for some of these planets just discovered, it’s all backwards! The redshifted side gets blocked first, and then the blueshifted side. That means the planet is going around the star the wrong way. The press release about this discovery has a nice video which makes this a bit more clear.

    Does this mean our theory is wrong? Well, not exactly. It probably means that overall the theory is solid, but that there are exceptions, modifications, we don’t understand. Most likely the planets that form around other stars start off revolving around the star the same way, but then some sort of gravitational interaction with other forming planets knocks them off course. Some of these newly discovered systems do appear to have outer planets that could do the trick; the tug-of-war resulting from a close encounter could slingshot one of the planets into a retrograde (backwards) orbit.

    This would play hell with the system. The planet knocked backwards would migrate in close to the star, tossing other smaller planets either into the star or out of the system entirely. If that’s true, then it means these weird planet systems won’t have many planets, just the one backwards-revolving one and one or two outer planets. That’s a nice prediction, in fact, and one that can be confirmed or falsified with more observations.

    And it’s not like this is a rare event: fully 6 out of 27 systems appear to have these backwards-moving planets! That means that however these planets get knocked about, it has to happen fairly often. Obviously, we need to observe a lot more of these systems so we can get better statistics, and be able to see what similarities and differences they have with each other. That’s the best way to figure out what the heck is going on.

    What does all this mean? Well, it means, as usual, that Nature is a bit more clever than we are, thinking up all sorts of ways of forming planets and systems of planets that didn’t initially occur to us. But that’s how science works. Things get complicated, so the first thing to do is simplify. Make your idea general. Then start adding complexity to it to explain what you actually see. As observation techniques get better, the idea has to get modified to account for new data.

    In this case, it’s a pretty big modification, but that’s not surprising: we’re new at this planet finding thing. We’re bound to get plenty of surprises for a while, until we have a better grasp of the situation. Surprises are good: they help us test the theory, they help us understand reality a little better, and they help us learn a little bit more.

    But they’re also fun. Who wants a Universe we understand completely and utterly? How boring that would be! Science is all about peeking around the next corner and seeing what’s there. And there are always more corners. Always.

    ESO/L. Calçada


  • Midwest Airlines To Take Frontier Name, Still Offer Cookies

    Since they both were acquired by the same holding company last year, it’s been an inevitability that both Midwest Airlines and Frontier would eventually end up flying under the same brand, but it remained to be seen whether one would fold into the other or there would be a completely new name. That mystery ended this morning with Republic announcing that, as of today, Midwest will now be part of the Frontier family.


    Speaking at a press conference this morning, an airline exec explained, “We’re going to have to have a consistent product offering brand promise for our customers if we’re going to reach our fullest potential.” And after consulting “tens of thousands of customers” and “4,500 employees,” they figured that the Frontier name demonstrated “greater growth potential.”

    Of some consolation to fans of Midwest — their famous in-flight chocolate chip cookies will remain.

    Midwest Airlines Will Adopt Frontier Name, Keep Chocolate Chip Cookies [Jaunted]

    Brand Announcement Video [Qik]

  • The Electric Squareback I Should’ve Built

    The VW Type 3 Squareback is a scrumptious little jellybean and I would proudly putter around in one. So when my family recently gave the order to scrap an inherited ‘71 Squareback, I died a little inside. This city boy has limited garage space and zero mad money for restoration projects. I had to let it go. If I had a Jay-Lenoesque restoration shop, or even an extra 500 bucks, I would’ve dragged it home and made it buzz with electricity. Sacrilege? I appreciate a high-strung pancake engine that can rattle the world to bits, but a Squareback that can spin its tires with nothing more than a high-pitched whine is simply rad. Florida-based bakery Pastry Art built this ‘lectric Squareback to deliver sugary confections. Mine would’ve looked something like it, but with a more subtle paint job. Hit the jump for a video of the build.

    Project Green Machine from VW TV on Vimeo.


  • 2010 Off to Slowest VC Fund Raising Start Since 1993, Says NVCA

    nvca_logo_jan10.jpgThough rising numbers from the final quarter for 2009 had many hopeful that 2010 would see a rebound of venture capital funds, new data from the Nation Venture Capital Association (NVCA) is bound to disappoint as Q1 2010 saw the lowest first quarter numbers (PDF) in 17 years. According to the NVCA, just $3.6 billion has been raised so far this year by VCs compared to $5.2 billion in 2009 and $7.1 billion 2008.

    Sponsor

    Back in January, we postulated that the uptake in fundraising by VCs during the final quarter of 2009 could lead to increased VC spending in 2010. The first quarter did see record breaking merger and acquisition numbers, but as NVCA president Mark Heesen points out, the IPO market continued to struggle – a fact he says may have contributed to the new low numbers for VC funds.

    nvca_stats_apr10.jpg“Over the last two years, alternative asset allocations have declined and the exit market has suffered, putting venture firms in the unenviable position of communicating their value in an extremely challenging environment,” says Heesen. “Many firms have been waiting until the exit market improves before embarking upon their fundraising efforts.”

    Heesen does, however, expect that these numbers will improve over the course of the year following the lead of the M&A and IPO markets which have already shown signs of improvement this year. The NVCA believes that most VC firms will be able to continue to raise funds in 2010, especially as the year continues, but also warns that the industry is headed towards an era of consolidation with smaller firms merging with larger funds or shutting down all together.

    For startups, the recent numbers are certainly disconcerting, but there is still plenty of venture capital out there, just not as much as there used to be. Right now the VC industry seems very shaky, as analysts attempt to read the tea leaves to make predictions about the future, but entrepreneurship still has its room for opportunity. Quality companies will still find funding, so for startups, the main goals to focus on when seeking funding are building a quality product and ensuring your investors of a profitable future.

    Discuss


  • Sponsor post: Sponsor post: Social Business Edge: Operating Manual for 21st Century Business

    • Date: April 19, 2010
    • Location: New York City

    The rise of the real-time, social web has become one of the critical factors in this new century, along with a radically changed global economic climate, an accelerating need for sustainable business practices and a political context demanding increased openness in business. These issues cannot be dealt with one by one, but instead must be approached as connected elements of a new world order for business. Social Business Edge is designed to address these issues, and to bring together a community of visionaries, practitioners and tool makers to collectively explore what form the social business — and our aspirations to design it — will take. Speakers include Stowe Boyd, John Hagel III, Diane Hessan, Baratunde Thurston, Juliette Powell and Jamais Cascio.

    For more information: http://www.edgewards.com/sbe

  • Quick Spin: Ariel Atom 3 is awesomeness that defies all classification

    Filed under: , ,

    2010 Ariel Atom 3 – Click above for high-res image gallery

    Before we get into the actual meat and potatoes of this review, please know that the absolute absurdity of the Ariel Atom 3 is not lost on us. It starts out as a sordid collection of mild steel tubing and a somewhat unassuming 2.0-liter K20Z four-cylinder engine mated to a six-speed manual, both pulled from the Honda parts bin. Throw in some fiberglass and a smattering of carbon fiber, four wheels, two lightweight racing seats with four-point harnesses, a steering wheel and some pedals, and that’s just about it, save the optional windshield.

    But the result is greater than the sum of its parts. Much, much greater. In fact, we’re convinced that the latest Ariel Atom is the purest, most singularly focused driver’s car ever made. Like you, we’ve always wondered what it’s like to strap into an Atom and head off towards the sunset. Today, thanks to our friends at Forman Motorsport, we finally find out. Follow the jump to keep reading.

    Photos by Jeremy Korzeniewski / Copyright (C)2010 Weblogs, Inc.

    Continue reading Quick Spin: Ariel Atom 3 is awesomeness that defies all classification

    Quick Spin: Ariel Atom 3 is awesomeness that defies all classification originally appeared on Autoblog on Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:58:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments

  • Fedora 13 Beta Released

    500px-RH-Fedora_logo-nonfreeFedora 13 Beta has just been released a few hours ago. Named “Goddard”, the final version of Fedora 13 will sport many new features such as KDE 4.4, latest builds of the XFCE environment and Sugar Learning Environment apart from the usual bug fixes and functionality additions.

    If you are looking for the bigger catch, wait up for the final release in the middle of May this year. For those restless, download the beta iso from here. And of course, if you don’t know your way around bugs and geeky mosquitoes, don’t download this. The Beta is presumably the last crucial milestone of Fedora 13, and as such, only critical bugs will be fixed now for the coming final release.

    The Beta has a number of new features, such as automatic print driver installation with the help of PackageKit; new software such as ShotWell photo manager, Pino microblogging client; NetworkManager improvements over bluetooth and mobile broadband connectivity; support for the latest iPods and iPhones and 3D graphics support backed solely by open source drivers.

    That’s not all. There’s also better color management: so your documents bear the same color on screen and on paper. Also, the user management portal has been completely redesigned for easier access and use.

    The above is the feature-list that may interest the end user, Fedora 13 has got several goodies for both developers and administrators as well. Developers get easier Python debugging when using gdb and support for NetBeans Java EE 6 among other features. For sys admins, there’s quite a few improvements with BFO (allows users to download a single, tiny image and install current and future versions of Fedora without having to download additional images), SSSD (provides expanded features for logging into managed domains), IPv6 support, support for Zarafa Groupware (Microsoft Exchange alternative) among others. Check out a detailed feature list here.

    TAGS: , ,

    Announcement: Missing Mobile News in the Main RSS Feed? We have decided to remove the mobile content from the main feed, please subscribe to our dedicated Mobile News RSS Feed at http://feeds.techie-buzz.com/techiemobile. Thank you for your understanding.

    Fedora 13 Beta Released originally appeared on Techie Buzz written by Keshav Khera on Tuesday 13th April 2010 12:57:55 PM. Please read the Terms of Use for fair usage guidance.

    Don’t miss these Related Posts:

    Join Techie Buzz on Your Favorite Social Networking Sites


  • The 16 Greatest Sci-Fi Authors Of All Time

    Science fiction writers are a dime a dozen, but certain members of their guild have the power to shape our dreams, and spin us into unimagined worlds of wonder and intrigue. Trying to whittle down a list of thousands of authors to the absolute best was a damned hard task. I had to set one hard rule — the authors had to admit they were writing science fiction. Sorry Atwood and Vonnegut, you’re out. There were so many amazing authors that didn’t make the final cut — Pohl, Farmer, Gibson. But, in the end, these 16 are the true greats of the field.

    16. Ian M. Banks

    Banks’ work is divided into two areas — science fiction and literature. The former have his name with middle initial, the latter without. When I picked up The Wasp Factory, I didn’t realize this, and spent a few days with a rather perplexed look on my face. Banks’ genre work tends to show off his strong anarchosocialist ideals — or at least anti-capitalist views. Perhaps best known for his Culture novels, his split of writing literature and sci fi under different names has felt increasingly unnecessary as his career has progressed, as his SF work has become ever more acknowledged for its literary strength.

    15. E.E. “Doc” Smith

    One of the kings of pulp, Doc Smith was known as the father of Space Opera. Far out technologies, sweeping battles of good and evil, twisted aliens — he knew how to do things right. A food engineer during the day, at nights he penned his galactic tales. Most remember for the Skylark and Lensman series, Smith’s works influenced a generation of writers. Without him, there would have been no Star Wars, no Green Lantern, and no Babylon 5. He invented the space cop, and perfected the evil empire. That’s an impressive freaking legacy.

    14. Robert Silverberg

    There’s prolific, then there’s Silverberg prolific. By his own count, Silverberg wrote about a million words a year, in any genre. While science fiction short stories were his forte, he also wrote biographies, non-fiction, and, when times were tough, softcore porn. He has won five Nebula awards, three Hugos, and named a Grand Master by the Science Fiction Writers of America. That’s a hell of a lot of phallic looking trophies. That said, if I spent 55 years publishing just about annually, I’d want some freaking credit, too!

    13. Damon Knight

    In addition to having one of the most fucking metal names of all time, Knight essentially shaped the world of science fiction short stories in the latter half of the 20th century. Prolific, intelligent, and so skilled the Science Fiction Writers Of America named their lifetime achievement award after him, Knight’s work is always worth checking out. For people who aren’t familiar with his writing, he’s best known for the “To Serve Man” episode of the Twilight Zone. If you have the time or inclination, reading across a large timespan of his work creates a portrait of an artist evolving. His latter stories became much like Philip K. Dick, filled with post-modern twists, paranoia and occasional batshit weirdness. Seriously, check out his last novel Humpty Dumpty: An Oval — it’s balls to the wall crazy.

    12. Neal Stephenson

    Stephenson really came to prominence with Snow Crash in 1992, picking up mantle of cyberpunk, and injecting a mammoth dose of linguistics, big ideas, mathematics and philosophy. These days you can spot Stephenson’s books from across the store just from their sheer size, as he produces some of the most intellectually challenging, well researched and theoretically dense writing imaginable. Like a bunch of you, I have a bad habit of reading into the early hours of the morning if I get hooked on a book. I tried that with Stephenson, and after about midnight, my brains ability to comprehend what he was talking about just shut down, leaving me staring at a page of words without the faculties to make sense of them. While reading his stuff can seem like work at times, it’s always mammothly rewarding to do so.

    11. H.G. Wells

    One of the two “fathers of science fiction”, Wells’ novels are a key part of even the most basic of science fiction libraries. The Time Machine, The Island of Doctor Moreau, The Invisible Man, The War of the Worlds, he also wrote what is considered to be the world’s first dystopian novel — When The Sleeper Wakes. Staunchly socialist, and a pacifist, it’s a touch ironic that Wells invented modern tabletop wargaming too. All you Warhammer players have this guy to thank for that.

    10. Jules Verne

    The other of science fiction’s two daddies, Verne’s work was often more grounded in real science than Wells, but not always by a huge margin. He penned classics like A Journey to the Centre of the Earth, From the Earth to the Moon, Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea, Around the World in Eighty Days and The Mysterious Island. He’s the world’s second most translated author, with more than 4000 translations enacted on his work. He predicted air conditioning, automobiles, the Internet, television, and electricity. His novel From the Earth to the Moon mirrored the American space program closely, and sent three astronauts to the moon, from a launch site in Florida, with a water landing on re-entry. Of course, he imagined shooting them out of the barrel of a gun, but there you go.

    9. Ray Bradbury

    Another king of short stories, Bradbury excelled in horror and scifi, but also dabbled in fantasy and mystery. For novels, he’s most recognized for Fahrenheit 451, and his works have frequently been adapted for the screen — both television and film. They even gave him is own TV show, The Ray Bradbury Theater, which adapted some 65 of his stories. By some counts, he has written more than 400 novelettes and short stories, earning him the National Medal of the Arts, the French Ordre des Arts et des Lettres, a star on the Hollywood walk of fame and an award named after him for screenwriting. Even though he wrote a considerable amount for television, his most famous novel — Fahrenheit 451 — was an allegory of the mediums ability to dumb down the populace. An interesting sentiment from someone who derived so much success from the box.

    8. Douglas Adams

    Douglas Adams didn’t write nearly as many works as most of the other entries on this list, mostly due to his focusing more on television and radio screenplays then novels. However, the ones he did write ended up having a massive impact on geek culture. Sure, Dirk Gently was funny, and Starship Titanic was a genius game — but it all came down to Hitchhiker’s. Originally a radio play that turned into novels, TV shows, comics and an ill-fated movie. Some argue the radio versions are the most important, others the novels. While both forms tell the same story, there are tidbits scattered throughout that only occur in each medium, rewarding the diligent fan. H2G2, as the series is affectionately known, has become such an essential part of geek culture, that people will reference 42 and babelfish without any understanding of where the concepts come from. Those people are to be smacked resoundingly around the upside of the head, and pointed to the nearest library.

    7. Michael Moorcock

    Bearded bastard father of British science fiction, by the age of 16 he was a magazine editor, and brought about the New Wave scifi movement in the mid-60s. Rebelling against the space operas and technology focussed work of their pulp forbearers, New Wave instead embraced a more individualistic, society focused, and literary view on science fiction. They broke off from much of their past, and attempted to revive a genre of big dumb objects into a legitimate literary field, with experimental approaches to narrative, and a rebellion against the American conservative focus of scifi up to that point. And they made a big splash. While it would be a bit much to place all of the kudos for New Wave on Moorcock, his work as an editor and writer were seminal in the movement. For his written work, he’s best remember for his multiverse/multinarrative metanalysis of Campbellian archtypes known as the “Eternal Champion”.

    6. Harlan Ellison

    Mean-spirited, notoriously litigious, and a hater of computers, Ellison is one of the most prolific, awarded and well-respected writes of the 20th century. He still apparently refuses to write on a computer, composing his legendary prose on a manual Olympia typewriter. He’s won four Nebulas, 11 Hugos and six Stokers. He’s also created the most perfect literary example of Hell in “I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream”, which is quite honestly one of the most horrific stories ever crafted by man. He’s responsible for the classic Star Trek episode “The City on the Edge of Forever” and “Demon with a Glass Hand” for the outer limits. With over 1000 titles to his name (and five wives), it would be far too easy to spend this list just discussing his immense body of work. While doubtless a curmudgeon, he’s also a a classic author.

    5. Philip K. Dick

    According to rumors, Philip K. Dick believed that many of his ideas were being beamed into his brain by a space computer god called VALIS. He also knew this was insane, but he got good stories from it, so he didn’t do anything to stop it. Staunchly anti-authority, Dick spent much of his adult life battling drug addiction and mental health issues, while at the same time crafting twisted, paranoid and brilliant fiction. For some reason Dick’s work is loved by Hollywood, if only so they can make films that have almost nothing to do with the original story. Sure Minority Report and Total Recall were pretty good, but they were nothing like the original stories. Luckily, they got at least two right: Blade Runner and A Scanner Darkly. After his death, fans made an android version of PKD for the San Diego Comic Con, but the head was mysteriously lost by an airline employee.

    4. Robert Heinlein

    Oh boy, Heinlein. A divisive author if ever there was one. He just about started a religion with Stranger In A Strange Land, and introduced the world to the saying “there’s no such thing as a free lunch” with The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress. Starship Troopers has been read by some as pro-Fascist, his other works were fiercely libertarian in bent, with a fair amount of polyamory and group sex thrown in for good measure (though he refuses to write the word “tit”, always using “teat”). Heinlein’s later work became increasingly dense and self-indulgent, with novels like The Number Of The Beast bordering on unreadable wank. However, his early and middle stuff? Pure gold. World changing gold. As much as some people can argue against his views, you cannot deny the mammoth impact he had on the literary corpus of SF.

    3. Frank Herbert

    Herbert’s an interesting case. The (much deserved) success of the Dune novels has dwarfed Herbert’s other work. All of his stories show an appreciation for ecology and the intricate network of life that seems incredibly forward thinking given when he wrote them. Dune is considered the most popular science fiction book ever written, and viewed as a landmark in “soft science fiction” — SF that pays attention to people rather than science. He was also intrigued with the working of society and the mind, and his novels tended to be deftly multi-layered, with extra depth revealing itself on each read through. While his legacy may have been bastardized by his son’s work, the original novels still stand the test of time as immensely cerebral and soulful looks at humanity.

    2. Isaac Asimov

    Deserving of this honor due to his immense mutton-chops, if nothing else, Asimov was a God of SF. Not limiting himself to the stars, Asimov was published in nine of the ten major categories of the Dewey Decimal System — missing only Philosopy in the 100s. He wrote about science, Shakespeare, mysteries, biographies, astronomy, the Bible and others. And lots, and lots of science fiction. I’ve often hear that his Foundation series were his most popular, but I get the feeling his Robot series rival it, and the two corpora were linked by Asimov later in his life. A life long humanist, feminist, atheist and scientist, Asimov was awarded an astonishing 14 honorary doctorates from various universities. With more than 400 published books to his name, Asimov was a powerhouse, and thanks to him we have an amazing body of literature, and a moral code for robots to prevent their inevitable attempts at uprising.

    1. Arthur C. Clarke

    I debated long and hard over if Clarke or Asimov should take the top spot, and eventually, it just had to be Clarke. His work is so good, and so damned prescient, that it transcends belief. The guy freaking came up with the concept for geostationary communication satellites! An accomplished mathematician, his science fiction work often had a solid core of logic and fact to back up the supposition. Space Odyssey, Childhood’s End, Rama, The Light Of Other Days, Clarke’s novels were amazing and eerily predictive, foreseeing satellite communications, space elevators, the internet, email and teleconferencing. While his writing style was sparse (as was Asimov’s), the ideas painted therein were so vivid and well crafted, that Clarke is appropriately known as the greatest science fiction writer of all time.

  • What iPhone multitasking can do

    There are quite a few iPhone apps that are too slow now. Appigo’s ToDo.app needs to sync with tooldedo. That takes too long, I hate it.

    Evernote needs to sync and/or upload. Way too slow.

    There are other apps that are incomplete, because making them complete would make them unusable. I’d like my Voice Memos to be transcribed, but I want zero delay on launch and dictate.

    In all of these cases the time consuming task doesn’t need to take place while I have the UI in front of me. They can take place after I leave the app.

    Multitasking solves all of the above. The sync/communicate tasks can occur in the background while I move to do something else.

    That’s why I want iPhone multitasking. We’ll see in the fall if Apple’s version of limited multitasking is good enough. I fear it will be too limited for another year.

  • Allure Magazine May 2010 Naked Truth Edition: Ft. Kara DioGuardi, Jessica Capshaw, Colbie Caillat & More

    It’s that time of year again: Temperatures rise as “Alluring” Hollywood beauties — like Regina Hall and Jessica Capshaw — shed their clothes and bare all on the pages of Allure Magazine’s annual May Naked Truth Edition.


    Last year, Padma Lakshmi and Taraji P. Henson disrobed for the style mag. This year, Entourage’s Emmanuelle Chriqui, singing star Colbie Caillat, and American Idol Kara DioGuardi are stripped down to their birthday suits for the issue, which arrives on newsstands April 20.

    Emmanuelle: “Some women want bigger breasts, but [I wish] I could have had a dancer’s body. I sometimes wear plunging necklines because they make me feel smaller.”

    Jessica: “I was always the girl who had that baby face. I was never a rail-thin person.”

    Colbie: “I was afraid to do it, but I saw what this shoot meant: We all have our insecurities; we just can’t let them stop us from doing what we want in life. I worried that it might make [my younger fans] think I was changing somehow. I hope they think to themselves, ‘Yeah, she’s showing a woman’s body, and it’s beautiful.””

    Kara: “This shoot was less about beauty than about taking a risk and showing people a side of me they never have seen.”

    Regina: “I’ve been doing Ashtanga five days a week since the beginning of January. Next year, nothing is going to look any better or stand any higher!”

  • The Great Geoengineering Publishing Smackdown of 2010 | The Intersection

    As discussed on the latest episode of Point of Inquiry (stream, download), Eli Kintisch’s Hack the Planet isn’t the only book just out on this subject. There is also How to Cool the Planet by Jeff Goodell, author of Big Coal and a writer for Rolling Stone. This in and of itself is a phenomenon–the two books were clearly racing each other and ended up coming out at about the same time. The question is, is that timing right? I have no doubt we are going to have a big public debate about geoengineering at some point in the future. At that time, one or both of these books could be considered essential reading. However, thus far, neither seems to be having its big publishing breakout moment. Indeed, neither has any reviews yet on Amazon. I myself can’t speak to the books’ comparative quality: I was only sent, and have only read, Kintisch’s, and it’s excellent. For all I know, Goodell’s is equally worthy. If you’re interested, I recommend that you buy both of them. But you are not the general public. And as we’ve learned, 97 percent of Americans have no clue what geoengineering even is. They all ought to be reading these …


  • Exactly how many innings will Strasburg pitch?

    http://a323.yahoofs.com/ymg/ept_sports_fantasy_experts__26/ept_sports_fantasy_experts-900040231-1271173377.jpg?ymBUi.CDTrkH9gFB

    On Sunday afternoon, while Stephen Strasburg(notes) was earning a win in his pro debut, MLB Network’s Peter Gammons tweeted the following:

    When Mike Rizzo and Scott Boras finished the Strasburg deal in August, they agreed he’d be limited to around 100 IP in 2010

    If accurate, this report means that Strasburg will actually pitch fewer innings this year than he did at San Diego State last season (109.0). It also means that his immediate fantasy ceiling is essentially the same as that of a quality middle reliever. You’d be lucky to get a stat line from Strasburg in 2010 that looks like Tyler Clippard’s(notes) 2009. 

    But MASN’s Ben Goessling later spoke with Doug Harris, Washington’s director of player development, and he received a very different workload forecast:

    Asked about a Sunday report that the Nationals had agreed with Scott Boras, Strasburg’s agent, to only use the right-hander for 100 innings this year, Harris said, "I’m not sure that holds water. We’re looking for an incremental increase on what he’s done in the past." … Harris said he envisions Strasburg throwing between 150 and 160 innings this season, though "there are variables that come into that."

    If you drafted and stashed the 21-year-old Strasburg, then you’re clearly hoping the details Rizzo/Boras agreement — if any agreement exists — are incorrect. Harris’ projection is much friendlier for fantasy purposes, as it likely means that 90 to 110 of Strasburg’s innings would be pitched in the majors.

    We know that Strasburg has some sort of workload cap, and he’ll burn another five frames at Double-A on Friday, then five more next Wednesday. I’ll set the over/under for his total usage at 139.2 IP, with an early-September shutdown. (I’ll also set the over/under for total Strasburg blog posts at 139). Please pick a side in comments…


    Photo via US Presswire

  • Obama consulting GOP on Supreme Court pick

    THE WHITE HOUSE

    Office of the Press Secretary

    ______________________________________________________________________________

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

    April 13, 2010
    f

    Statement by the Press Secretary on Next Week’s Bipartisan Meeting to Discuss the Supreme Court Vacancy

    The President has invited the bipartisan leaders of the Senate and the bipartisan leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, April 21st to discuss the Supreme Court vacancy left by the retirement of Justice Stevens. Senators Reid, McConnell, Leahy, and Sessions will travel to the White House on Wednesday morning for the meeting.

  • UT Knoxville Students Receive National Science Foundation Fellowship

    KNOXVILLE – Three graduate students in the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, are recipients of the 2010 National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship. The NSF awards are given to students based on their potential as young scientists and for intellectual merit and broader impact. The fellowships are used to further their research.

    Emily Austin, an ecology and evolutionary biology graduate student, Michelle Russell, a psychology graduate student and Todd Schoborg, a biochemistry and cellular and molecular biology graduate student, each will receive $30,000 over the next year.

    Austin’s research aims to understand if global warming alters how fungi decompose wood of different tree types. Her work is important because decaying wood is considered to be a natural reservoir of carbon. Currently, the wood in forests decomposes slowly. However, if warming alters the kinds or the amount of fungi on a log, or the activity of the fungal community, decomposition rates could accelerate, thus increasing the amount of carbon that is released into the atmosphere.

    “Emily is one of the most creative young scientists I’ve had the opportunity to work with. Her experience working as an ecosystem ecologist and a molecular ecologist enables her to work in an emerging area — linking microbial community composition with function. Emily is smart, motivated, curious, a good mentor and a good communicator,” said Aimee Classen, assistant professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and Austin’s faculty mentor.

    Russell’s research focuses on the implications of forgiveness for relationships. She will analyze data of newlywed couples to determine the implications of forgiveness for subsequent marital satisfaction, depression and self-esteem. She also will examine the implications of forgiveness for forgiven partners’ subsequent negative behavior.

    “Michelle is a fantastic student and is on her way to being a brilliant scholar. I am not surprised she received this award. I am excited to see what comes out of her research,” said James McNulty, psychology associate professor and Russell’s faculty mentor.

    Schoborg’s area of research examines how chromatin, a supramolecular structure formed by proteins and DNA, is organized within the cell nucleus. This organization is key to numerous regulatory processes that may lead, for example, to stem cell differentiation or cancer.

    Specifically, Schoborg is interested in understanding the role that chromatin insulator proteins play in gene expression regulation and in the control of mobile DNA sequences, which are the origin of numerous mutations in our genome.

    “Since the beginning, Todd impressed me as a self-sufficient student, highly motivated and with a strong commitment to perform at the highest level. He enjoys doing research, but most importantly, he enjoys the thinking process behind all the work,” said Mariano Labrador, assistant professor with the department of biochemistry and cellular and molecular biology and Schoborg’s faculty mentor.

    The NSF’s fellowship program aims to help ensure the vitality of the human resource base of science and engineering in the U.S. The program recognizes and supports outstanding graduate students in NSF-supported science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines who are pursuing research-based master’s and doctoral degrees.

    NSF fellows are anticipated to become knowledge experts who can contribute significantly to research, teaching and innovations in science and engineering. These individuals are crucial to maintaining and advancing the nation’s technological infrastructure and national security as well as contributing to the economic well-being of society at large.

    Past fellows include numerous Nobel Prize winners, U.S. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu, Google founder Sergey Brin and “Freakonomics” co-author Steven Levitt.

    C O N T A C T:

    Whitney Holmes (865-974-5460, [email protected])