Blog

  • Louanner Peters joining Bobby Rush congressional staff

    Below, release from Rush…..

    Congressman Bobby L. Rush names noted political strategist and public policy expert Louanner Peters as deputy chief of staff/district director for 1st Congressional District of Illinois

    CHICAGO – U.S. Rep. Bobby L. Rush (D-IL01) has named noted public policy expert Louanner Peters as his deputy chief of staff and director of his District-wide operations in Illinois. Peters, a well known fixture in state government and national political circles, brings a wealth of leadership to the representative’s team and his constituents.

    “I feel like I just got the number one player in a first round draft pick,” said Rush. “Louanner is an efficient and effective leader. For over three decades she has helped to shape public policy that has greatly improved the quality of life for millions of people across the country–particularly the poor and the young. She is a powerhouse and I am honored to work with her.”

    Peters served as deputy governor in the Office of Governor Rod Blagojevich where she provided oversight and supervision for the Illinois’ Health and Social Services, Public Safety, Natural Resources, Historic Preservation and Capitol Development agencies in the areas of policy and program consistency and fiscal management. Most recently she served as chief executive officer for JLP Consulting, LLC, a full-service strategic planning, business development and public affairs firm in Springfield, IL.

    Peters also worked for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)’s Voter Empowerment Project in the organization’s Baltimore headquarters where she coordinated non-partisan voter registration and education campaigns in 21 states. This is not her first time working for the U.S. House of Representatives: between 1981 and 1993, she worked in various capacities for U.S. Rep. Gus Savage (D-IL02) where she drove legislative initiatives for minority business development opportunities and public works as his chief of staff and primary advisor. Over three decades she has built an impressive resume of activism, political advocacy and fiscal management.

    The savvy administrator holds a B.A. in political science from Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge and a master of social work from Jane Addams College of Social Work, University of Illinois in Chicago.

    “I’ve spent most of my life in service of others and I am thrilled to be able to continue to serve the people of the 1st congressional District of Illinois as well as my nation,” Peters said. “This is a tremendous opportunity and an exciting time to work in Congress. I truly look forward to working with Rep. Rush, our colleagues on the Hill and with our dynamic staff as we continue to fight to put America back to work and level the playing field for so many others.”

    Peters starts immediately.

    ###

    Stephanie Gadlin | Deputy Communications Director/Press Secretary

  • Gartman: Just Look At The Bustle In New York City, The Economy Is Getting Way Better

    Today, Dennis Gartman is in New York City doing a multitude of different things as he appears on CNBC and speaks with the New York Bond Club.

    It appears a trip to the Big Apple got him thinking of the economy and how it has been performing in recent months. He lends us an anecdote, telling a tale of waiting in a long cab line at LaGuardia airport, observing increasing hotel room occupancy rates, and noticing more “Help Wanted” signs on stores around the country.

    In other words, the economy is improving and quite well. We are returning to a state of normalcy as Dennis Gartman watches New York’s streets become more “materially crowded,” whatever that means. Perhaps he is referring to the increasing amount of tourism that has picked up, which in turn means more bus/train/airline companies taking in more money. And with the Dow approaching 11,000, we may finally be exiting the recession for good soon.

    Gartman notes that “the economy is clearly turning sharply for the better, and the data in the next several months shall prove that to be true.” We certainly hope so.

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • Mexicali earthquake halts some elevators in L.A. high-rises

    Three strangers waited for the elevator at the Wilshire State Bank building Monday morning. One of them, a businessman, pushed the "up" button. Nothing happened.

    He pushed it again. Still nothing.

    Five long minutes passed. The man walked over to a stand of Korean newspapers, took one, and started reading.

    Similar scenes played out across the region Monday after Sunday’s magnitude 7.2 earthquake in Baja California stopped or slowed elevator service in some Los Angeles buildings.

    "The calls are rolling in," said Michael Mateyko, an elevator repairman with Hoist Elevator Co.

    Other elevator companies reported a similarly busy morning. Mateyko said managers of buildings near the airport and along Miracle Mile called him to say, "Hey, our elevators are down. What’s up?"

    Most elevators that have been modernized or built in the last 15 years have earthquake detection devices, Mateyko said. When the sensor is triggered, the elevator stops at the nearest floor and opens its doors so that no one is trapped inside. Before service can resume, the elevator must be inspected and the sensor reset.

    To the chagrin of security guards at the office building in mid-Wilshire, the repairmen had not yet arrived Monday morning, which meant they had a lot of explaining to do.

    "Hola, Jose," one of them said to a maintenance worker, who was one of the three strangers waiting for the elevators. "The earthquake messed up the elevators," he said in Spanish. "We’re using the stairs."

    But Jose was going to one of the top floors of the 14-floor building, and he was carrying a heavy tool kit. He and the others said they would prefer to go up in the one elevator that was working, even after the security guard warned them it would be a slow ride.

    "That 7.2," the guard said as he ushered the group into the working elevator, "Whoa! The house was wobbling side to side."

    Just before the doors closed, a woman dripping from the rain squeezed in.

    "12 please," she said.

    The guard told her the elevator was sluggish and could travel only one floor at a time. He said he would take the three passengers who had been waiting to their floors first.

    "Oh my God!" she said, dropping her bag on the floor in a huff.

    "My bad for the inconvenience," the guard apologized.

    "I really don’t understand," she said. "I really don’t get it."

    The elevator crept from floor to floor, depositing its passengers one by one. When the rain-soaked woman finally stepped off, the guard smiled.

    "People are getting impatient up here," he said. When it was time for them to come down, he said, they’d have to take the stairs.

    — Kate Linthicum

  • Ontario: Green Energy Strategy Bearing Fruit

    Enphase Energy’s plan to start manufacturing microinverters at a plant outside Toronto is being hailed as proof that Ontario’s Green Energy Act is working.

    Paul Nahi, Enphase’s chief executive officer, said that the company’s decision to open its first manufacturing plant outside of China was driven by the laws that require locally produced equipment for use in wind and solar.

    An editorial today in The Globe and Mail, a national Canadian paper, quotes Nahi as saying:

    It is very unlikely that we would have set up another manufacturing facility in Ontario, had it not been for this requirement.

    Ontario’s green energy industry has taken off like a rocket in recent months, starting with the announcement of a $7 billion wind and solar project with Samsung and Korea Electric.

    The province’s feed-in tariff program and green energy legislation has also enticed Germany’s Bosch Solar and Indian company Solar Semiconductor Inc. to announce plants.

    Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty was criticized for offering a “sweetheart” deal to Samsung but his overall plan to turn Ontario into a green energy manufacturing hub seems to be paying off quickly.

    McGuinty said at the Samsung announcement in January:

    Above all this means that Ontario is officially the place to be for green energy manufacturing in North America… During the next several years the U.S. is going to build many many thousand of megawatts of energy from renewables. Someone is going to have to supply that technology.

    Now Enphase is getting in too.

    Petaluma, Calif.-based Enphase recently raised $40 million in private financing to fund the plant.

    The company’s photovoltaic microinverters, which are manufactured by its partner Flextronics, change power generated by individual solar panels from direct current into alternating current and improve the efficiency of the system.

    PV-tech.org reports that the production line will have an initial capacity of 500,000 microinverters (100 megawatts) in the first year with plans to go to one million units by 2011.

    Installers that use the microinverters will qualify to participate in the feed-in tariff program.

  • The Boston Angel Market

    Chris Sheehan wrote:

    [Editor’s Note: Chris Sheehan is a managing director of CommonAngels, which is an investor in Xconomy. This post also appears on Sheehan’s blog.]

    I was recently asked by a couple of early stage entrepreneurs to talk about angel investing in Boston.  The angel market around town has always been fairly active and cuts across many sectors, e.g. software, hardware, networking, Internet, life sciences, optics, robotics, medical devices, cleantech, retail, industrial products, etc.  There has been discussion lately about the lack of active angel investors in Web-based businesses—and the concerns are legitimate. But the truth is that there is a wide diversity of Boston-area angel investors, each with diverse interests.

    For this post, I’ll focus on the market that I invest in and know best—early stage information technology.  I’ve broken this into two parts: Finding angel investors to help get the venture started, and getting angel support for the go-to-market phase.

    First step: Looking for Those First Angels to Get Started

    The initial company creation phase involves building a product/service and testing some of your hypotheses about the business.  This is the pre-seed or seed stage, or as one of my members puts it, going “from nothing to something.”  For this stage many startups need anywhere from $10k to a few hundred thousand dollars, depending on the type of business (see my earlier post on case studies for this phase).

    Around Boston, as in most geographies, there is a shortage of this type of funding—there are always too many startups and seed stage ideas looking for seed capital.  I would say, though, that the gap “feels” a bit more acute at the moment for IT startups, in particular Web-based startups, as a result of three factors. First, the financial mess that hit us in 2008, and what it did to our investment portfolios—we are 1/2 to 2/3 climbing back, but it’s left a “psychological” mark in the short term. Second, more innovation, particularly around B2B and B2C Web-based businesses, meaning there’s more competition for seed capital in these sectors. Third, the lack of recent or sizeable IT exits that in turn creates a bench of wealthy high tech entrepreneurs to invest in the next set of entrepreneurs.

    Most of the initial investment I see for this stage comes from:

    • Founders’ own dollars/unpaid time and family/friends
    • Angels who know the founder(s) or are one or two degrees of separation away. These angels have known you for a while, like you, and basically are betting on “you” along with what they perceive as an interesting opportunity.  These relationships are business, personal, or both. And this is where there is a wide variation—I’ve seen some entrepreneurs quickly raise $200k from their network. On the other hand I’ve seen young, smart entrepreneurs with potentially interesting ideas who unfortunately don’t have a network, and struggle to raise money except from their closest friends and family.
    • Domain experts. These are investors who are working in the entrepreneurs’ space (retail, marketing, EDA, online advertising, restaurants, you name it), and can easily identify both emotionally and intellectually with the problem being addressed. You don’t need to convince them that there is something worth solving.  Having said that, many domain experts in the Boston market seem more willing to serve as advisers than as angel investors.
    • Most check sizes I see are between $5k to $100k, typically $15k – 25k.

    Angel groups will invest at this level, although I’d say most tend to look at the next major funding gap—the early go-to-market stage. Venture firms are less likely to invest at this stage. It’s not that they don’t do seed investing, it’s just not …Next Page »

    UNDERWRITERS AND PARTNERS



























  • Video of Ovi Maps offline on a helicopter and Trabant

    Found under: Nokia, Joe, Ovi Maps, Offline, Maps, GPS, Video,

    Here is great video produced by Nokia which shows the use of Ovi Maps in Offline mode while flying with a helicopter. First video is of Joe is passionate about cartography and flying. He took a helicopter tour of Berlin and tracked the helicopters GPS position with Ovi Maps on his Nokia N97 in offline mode. Before getting on the helicopter he used Nokia Map Loader to preload the map of Berlin and Brandenburg on his phone.Second one is of Richa and Justus who are driving Trabant in Berlin.

    Read More

    Read more in mobile format

  • GM anuncia que utilizará novo sistema de acelerador inteligente

    Logotipo GM

    Depois dos grave acidentes ocasionados pelo sistema de freios de veículos da Toyota acarretando além do recall, vários outros problemas para a companhia, a GM anunciou nessa terça-feira (6 de abril) nos Estados Unidos que até o ano de 2012 todos os seus veículos equipados com os sistemas de acelerador eletrônico e cambio automático receberão um acelerador inteligente chamado de Enhanced smart pedal.

    A grande diferença do Enhanced smart pedal para os sistemas atuais, é que ele reduz automaticamente a potencia do motor caso os pedais do acelerador e freios sejam pressionados simultanemante, com o proposito de diminuir a possibilidade de acidentes. Isso será possível com a adição de uma nova função da central eletrônica do motor, que analisará também as posições dos pedais de acelerador e dos freios.

    De acordo com o vice-presidenta de operações globais de produtos da GM, Tom Stephens. essa ação apenas reforça a preocupação da companhia com a segurança dizendo: “A análise que a mídia realizou dos dados do governo apontam que o histórico de segurança da GM colocam a marca entre as mais seguras da indústria. Ao mesmo tempo nós sabemos que a segurança está em primeiro lugar para nossos consumidores, então aplicaremos esta tecnologia adicional para assegurá-los que eles podem contar com os freios de seus veículos GM”.

    Fonte: AutoBlog


  • The Moscow Bombing – A Classic Chechen “Black Widow” Operation

    he March 29, 2010, martyr-bombings in the two Moscow Metro stations served as a reminder of the escalating and evolving jihadist surge into Russia’s soft underbelly.

     

    The bombing took place at peak rush hour. The first martyr-bomber detonated herself at 7:56am in the Lubyanka station which serves the Kremlin’s bureaucracy. The second martyr-bomber detonated herself at 8:37am in the Park Kulturi station, a connection and transfer station from the Ring Line leading to Moscow’s center. Both martyr-bombers detonated themselves inside train cars just as the doors were opened to let passengers in and out. At the time of writing, the death toll stands at 39 fatalities and more than 70 wounded.

     

    The Moscow bombing was a classic Chechen “Black Widow” operation carried out by young women from the Northern Caucasus. The term “Black Widows” was coined by the Russian security authorities in the mid-1990s after the Chechen jihadist leadership identified the first female martyr-bombers as widows and relatives of martyred mujahedin out to avenge their blood. As with previous “Black Widow” operations during the first half of the decade, the jihadist commanders were apprehensive about the possibility that the would-be martyr-bomber would change her mind at the last minute.

     

    A couple of such changes of heart did happen during the first half of this decade, providing the Kremlin with tremendous intelligence gains. Therefore, the jihadists developed a system of female chaperons who escort the would-be martyrs to the spot of detonation to make sure they could not abandon their mission. They leave the would-be martyrs only a few minutes before detonation. The Metro CCTV recorded the presence of, and hovering by, such chaperons in both Metro stations.

     

    The CCTV recordings also enabled the Russian security forces to already locate the bus driver in the line between Chechnya and Moscow who took the four women (the two would-be martyr bombers and their chaperons) and a male who seemed to be in charge (and might have also been caught in the CCTV).

     

    The waist-bombs worn by the two martyr bombers were of a modern design. This type of bomb was perfected in recent years by the jihadists in Iraq and subsequently in  operations in Afghanistan-Pakistan. These waist-bombs are smaller and lighter than earlier generations of vest-bombs and thus easier to conceal.

     

    The bomb at the Lubyanka station had only 4kg of high-explosives and the bomb at the Park Kulturi station had 2kg. At the same time, these waist-bombs are more lethal in crowded places because of more concentrated directional explosions and a better distribution of shrapnel. Initial forensic evidence suggests that both bombs also had secondary-fuses which could be activated by cell-phones; probably a fall-back method in case the “Black Widows” hesitate at the last minute.

     

    The mere fact that the female martyr-bombers were wearing this kind of waist-bombs is in itself a strong indication of direct connection between the perpetrators in Moscow and the jihadist training facilities along the Durand Line in Afghanistan-Pakistan. Indeed, Pakistani senior intelligence officials concur that the Moscow bombings “were most likely planned and executed by people trained in Pakistan’s tribal areas”.

     

    The mere occurrence of terrorist strikes in Moscow need not come as a surprise.

     

    These were anticipated for a long time. Given the evolving security regime within the jihadist movement, it was only a question of time before a jihadist team would strike out at the heart of Russia. Moscow has always been the jihadists’ preferable objective.

     

    The imminence of jihadist strikes at the heart of Russia has been the result of a confluence of two major developments: (1) The rejuvenation and escalation of the training and preparation infrastructure along the Durand Line in Afghanistan-Pakistan; and (2) The expansion of the jihadist Jamaat system in the North Caucasus due to the reopening of supply and support lines via Georgia.

     

    The training infrastructure in the Afghanistan-Pakistan border area was restored in the Autumn of 2007 to the point that prolonged and sophisticated courses can now take place without interruption. The main courses are provided to would-be commanders, expert-trainers and organizers from the West. These include a growing number of Western converts (West Europeans, Americans and Russians) who retain their original identity papers and looks for easy travel in the West. This effort is under the personal command of Ilyas Kashmiri, the top Pakistani-Punjabi commander whose 313 Brigade, also known as the Lashkar al-Zil or “Army of the Shadows”, is the primary strike force of the jihadist movement.

     

    The actual training, handling. and control of all foreign fighters is in the hands of a small group of veteran Arab commanders, all of whom are reported to have operated in Europe for many years. The three key commanders involved in anti-Russia operations are Abu-Hanifah who commands the Turkish Kurds, Bosnians and Chechens (a generic name for all mujahedin from the Caucasus); Abu-Akash who commands the Uzbeks, Tajiks and other Central Asians; and Abu-Nasir who commands the Uighurs and Pakistanis.

     

    Most of the jihadists in these groups arrive from or via Turkey. The jihadists maintain identity clearing facilities within Turkey’s large Chechen and Uzbek communities. Since mid-2009, a growing number of mujahedin have been able to travel via Iran.

     

    In the last couple of years, the upper-most jihadist leadership has been emphasizing the global importance of the Emirate of the Caucasus. The jihadist leadership has resolved to exploit the separatist struggles throughout the North Caucasus — popularly known as the war in Chechnya — as the rallying point and springboard for a broader strategic jihad against Russia and the states of Central Asia.

     

    The jihadist master-plan envisages a pincer offensive launched from the Caucasus and Afghanistan-Pakistan, converging at the heart of Central Asia and then surging northwards into the heart of Russia. The declared objective of this master-plan is the establishment of the Islamic Emirate of Khorasan which encompasses the Central Asian republics, the northern parts of Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iran. Moreover, the upper-most jihadist leadership is convinced that victory in the Caucasus and Khorasan would then create conducive conditions for Islam’s triumph in the “end-of-time battles” in the Middle East.

     

    With the US-led West disengaging and withdrawing from Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Middle East, the upper-most jihadist leadership is convinced time is most opportune for launching this grand strategic surge. Hence, the escalation of jihadist operations throughout the heart of Asia and Russia.

     

    In practical terms, the jihadist surge in the Caucasus would have far more difficult to implement had it not been for the renewal of support by the Government of Georgia. Tbilisi seeks to exploit jihadist terrorism in order to hit Russian pipelines in the hope of ensnaring the US into actively supporting a new confrontation with Russia.

    In early December 2009, Tbilisi organized a high-level meeting of jihadist commanders from the Middle East and Western Europe in order “to coordinate activities on Russia’s southern flank”. In Tbilisi, Deputy Minister of Internal Affairs Lordkipanadze was the host and coordinator. The meeting was attended by several Georgian senior officials who stressed that Pres. Mikhail Saakashvili himself knew and approved of the undertaking. The meeting addressed the launch of both “military operations” in southern Russia and ideological warfare.

     

    The jihadists of the North Caucasus — including the Arab commanders in their midst — came out of the meeting convinced that Tbilisi was most interested in the spread of terrorism. The meeting was attended by, among others, Makhmud Muhammad Shabaan, an Egyptian senior commander who is also known as Seif al-Islam and who has been involved in Caucasus affairs since 1992. He took copious notes. According to Shabaan’s notes, the Georgian Government wanted the jihadists to conduct “acts of sabotage to blow up railway tracks, electricity lines and energy pipelines” in southern Russia in order to divert pipeline construction back to Georgian territory. Georgian intelligence promised to facilitate the arrival in the Caucasus of numerous senior jihadists by providing Georgian passports.

     

    Georgia agreed to facilitate the secure transfer of jihadists for training and indoctrination in Islamist madrassas in Turkey, and their clandestine return to Russia. Tbilisi also promised to provide logistical support including the reopening of bases in northern Georgia. Russian intelligence was not oblivious of the meeting. Seif al-Islam and two senior aides were target-killed on February 4, 2010. The Russians retrieved a lot of documents in the process. Moscow signaled its displeasure shortly afterwards when the presidents of Russia and Abkhazia signed a 50-year agreement on a Russian military base in order to “protect Abkhazia’s sovereignty and security, including against international terrorist groups”.

     

    The new jihadist focus on the Emirate of the Caucasus emboldened Chechen jihadist leader Dokka Umarov to threaten in mid-January 2010 to unleash a new wave of terrorism at the heart of Russia. He declared that “the Brigade of Martyrs, Riyad-us-Saliheen, has been really recreated and is in action”, and would spearhead the coming jihad. “The Martyrs’ Brigade is replenished with the best among the best of the mujahedin and if the Russians do not understand that the war will come to their streets that the war will come to their homes, so it is worse for them.”

     

    Umarov stressed there was no substitute to a marked escalation in the fighting throughout Russia because “the Islamic ummah can be liberated from the slavery of infidels only with weapons by means of the jihad”. He reiterated that “the zone of military operations will be extended to the territory of Russia” and that “blood will no longer be limited to our cities and towns” in the North Caucasus. “The war is coming to their cities,” Umarov declared. “If the Russians think that war only happens on television, somewhere far away in the Caucasus, where it can’t reach them, then InshAllah, we plan to show them that the war will return to their homes.”

     

    In mid-February 2010, Umarov formally declared the launch of a strategic offensive against Russia. He announced that the Caucasian Mujahedin under his command “will [soon] liberate the Krasnodar Territory, Astrakhan and the Volga lands”.

     

    Operationally, the key to the new jihadist offensive would be the jamaats — literally societies — prevailing in the North Caucasus. The jamaats are minuscule jihadist cells which operate clandestinely. The Islamist-jihadist movement is now seeking only a few dedicated zealots as the core of the jamaats. After all, it takes only a few martyr-terrorists to inflict massive carnage. Not seeking popular support and recognition, the Islamist-jihadist jamaats could operate clandestinely and in great secrecy, thus constituting a major challenge to the Russian security forces.

     

    With the frustration of the jihadists in the jamaats growing, and their self-radicalization intensifying in their self-imposed isolation from society, so grows their readiness to inflict substantial carnage on society as a manifestation of their own wrath.

     

    Cognizant of the looming threat, Russian intelligence intensified operations against the jihadist elite in the North Caucasus. Starting early March, the Russians had a series of impressive successes in target-killing several key jihadist commanders, both Arabs and Caucasians.

     

    On March 2, 2010, Russian security services located and target killed Said Buryatsky in the Ekazhevo village in the suburbs of Nazran, Ingushetia. The Russian security services located Buryatsky and his group of guards in a house that served as a bomb making factory for regional operations. The Russians assaulted the building, killing Buryatsky and six mujahedin, and capturing a few wounded mujahedin. The killing of Said Buryatsky — real name Alexander Tikhomirov — was a major achievement.

     

    Buryatsky was a convert from the east Siberian Buryatia region. For many years, he “trained for jihad” in Egypt under the auspices of the militant wing of the Muslim Brotherhood. Upon his return to the North Caucasus about five years ago, he emerged as a fiery imam and most influential ideologue of the jihadist movement. He was the ideologist behind the revived Riyad-us-Saliheen.

     

    In this capacity, Buryatsky identified, recruited and indoctrinated several groups of would-be martyr-bombers. Most important is a group of 30 young women smuggled to Turkey for intense training and indoctrination as the core of the new generation of “Black Widows”.

     

    A gifted and charismatic imam, Buryatsky also issued numerous jihadist manifestos which had tremendous influence in the jamaat movement. Since 2005, Buryatsky authored the statements taking responsibility for more than 15 terrorist strikes including the August 2009 martyr-bombing of a police headquarters in Ingushetia which killed more than 20 and injured some 140, and the November 2009 bomb attack on the Nevsky Express Moscow-to-St Petersburg train which killed 26 people.

     

    Although Buryatsky was said to have yearned for his own martyrdom in jihad in all his sermons and manifestos, his death leaves a gaping hole in the ideological foundations of the jihadist movement in the Caucasus.

     

    On March 17, 2010, the Russian security forces located and killed six senior mujahedin commanders close to Umarov — three of them Arab — in the village of Khazhi-Yurt in Chechnya’s Vedeno district. One of the commanders was the Arab mujahed Abu-Khaled, then in charge of providing the personal security for Dokka Umarov and his inner-circle. Fearful of penetration by Russian intelligence, the jihadist leaders in the North Caucasus rely on Arab bodyguards provided by the upper-most jihadist leadership in Afghanistan-Pakistan. Two other Arab bodyguards — known only as Muhammad and Yassir — were killed. The Russians were operating on information that Umarov himself was to show up for a meeting with Chechen commanders in preparations for escalation in the Grozny area. Apparently, Umarov changed his mind at the last minute and did not show up. However, the Russian source was reliable. Acting on this information, the Russians were able to track down Salmbek Akhmadov, the emir of the jihadist forces in Grozny. He immediately escaped to a safe-house in Makhachkala, Dagestan.

     

    On March 21, 2010, Russian special forces stormed the house and target-killed Akhmadov.

     

    On March 24, 2010,Russian security forces cornered Emir Sayfullah — real name Anzor Astemirov — in Nalchik, in Kabardino-Balkaria. When he refused to stop, he was shot in a brief fire-fight. Sayfullah was the emir of the jihadist forces of the United Vilayat of Kabarda, Balkaria, and Karachai. Sayfullah studied theology in Saudi Arabia before assuming a command position with the jihad. His religious-theological influence spread throughout the North Caucasus.

     

    In 2008, Umarov named him Head of the sharia court of the self-proclaimed Caucasus Emirate, the third-most-senior position in the jihadist hierarchy. Indeed, the communique about Emir Sayfullah’s martyrdom published by the “headquarters of the armed forces of the United Vilayat of Kabarda, Balkaria and Karachai” emphasized that “the Circassian peoples have not had a military commander who enjoyed such respect and authority” since the Caucasus wars of the 19th Century.

     

    On the night of March 27-28, 2010, Russian security forces raided a few jihadist hideouts in Ufa, Oktyabrsky city and the Chelyabinsk region, in Bashkiria (or Bashkortostan Republic). They were seeking the jihadist leaders in Bashkiria. Several firefights erupted and the mujahedin suffered numerous casualties. However the senior leaders succeeded to escape. The next day, the security forces succeeded to locate the safe-house in the Chelyabinsk region and surrounded it with massive forces.

     

    Bashir Pliyev, known as the “Emir of Bashkiria”, and eight members of the local Uighur Bulagaar Jamaat group surrendered without fight. An ethnic Ingush, Pliev joined the jihad while serving as a mole in the Russian Police. After he was suspected in 2005, he escaped and joined Shamil Basayev’s Riyad-us-Saliheen. He was very close to Basayev and served as his driver and guard on several operations. In 2006, Pliev was sent to Bashkiria to organize and train the local jihadist jamaats.

     

    The aggregate impact of this chain of target-killings and captures of jihadist commanders is the realization among the jihadist senior leaders that the Russian security services must have discovered ways to identify them and strike at the heart of the jamaat system. Hence, there is a growing pressure on the jihadist jamaats to carry out operations already in the pipeline before their assets are exposed and neutralized by the Russian security forces. By late March 2010, only seven of the 30 “Black Widows” who Buryatsky had indoctrinated and trained were known to be dead. Then, two detonated themselves in Moscow on March 29, 2010, and two more detonated themselves in Kizlyar, Dagestan, on the morning of March 31, 2010.

     

    Hence, of this “Black Widows” group alone there are 19 unaccounted for would-be martyr-bombers. As there are numerous other would-be martyrs trained and indoctrinated by Buryatsky and several other sheikhs and emirs in other jamaats, the threat of spectacular terrorism at the heart of Russia, as well as in the North Caucasus, is far from over.

     

    Russia is therefore facing a long and painful struggle.

     

    Despite the impressive successes of the Russian security forces, the jamaat system remains extremely difficult to identify and penetrate because of its inherent character and structure. There should be no doubt that there are numerous jamaat cells throughout Russia, not just the North Caucasus, that are still intact and yearning for jihad. Moreover, with the jihadist training and sponsorship system in the “emirate” of Khorasan now functioning, Kashmiri, Abu-Hanifah, and their Arab colleagues have resumed the training and dispatch of new networks and cells into Central Asia, the Caucasus, and the heart of Russia.

     

    The recent reactivation of the communication routes and safe-havens in Georgia enables the jihadist leadership to sustain the escalation of jihad in and via the “emirate of the Caucasus”. Kashmiri and Abu-Hanifah are putting emphasis on dispatching to Russia combat-hardened expert terrorists, mainly Chechens, Arabs, and Turks. These expert terrorists will serve as organizers, trainers and commanders of locally recruited and indoctrinated jihadists throughout the North Caucasus in order to expedite their anticipated strategic surge. This way, the jihadist leadership is maximizing the effectiveness and value of each and every expert terrorist they succeed in installing at the heart of their enemy’s lands.

     

    Hence, there developed a race between the jihadist movement and the Russian security forces. Ultimately, the Russians will win this race. However, until then, there will be a growing number of increasingly painful terrorist strikes at the heart of Moscow and elsewhere in Russia.

     

    On March 31, 2010, Dokka Umarov finally claimed in a statement responsibility for the Moscow bombing. “As you all know, on March 29, two special operations were carried out to destroy the infidels and send a greeting to the FSB.” He added that the Moscow bombings “had been organized under my personal order”. As in previous such statements, Umarov insisted that the bombings were “a retaliation and a retribution” for Russian massacres of Chechen innocent civilians. He stressed that the Moscow bombings were the first in a series of strikes which would soon be carried out in several Russian cities.

     

    There would be new and painful retaliations against the Russians “who send their gangs to the Caucasus and support their security services, who carry out massacres”. Umarov concluded by reminding that he had already promised the people of Russia that they would no more “idly watch the war in the Caucasus on their TV sets, watch it quietly, with no reaction to excesses and crimes committed by their gangs, which are being sent to the Caucasus under the leadership of Putin. Therefore the war will come to your streets, and you will feel it with your own lives and skins.”

     

    Umarov is serious, and the Kremlin is cognizant.

     

    Source: http://www.oilprice.com/article-the-moscow-bombing-an-inevitable-victory-for-moscow-but-a-hard-struggle-ahead-250.html

     

    Analysis By Yossef Bodansky for Oilprice.com who offer detailed analysis on Crude Oil, Geopolitics, Gold and most other commodities. They also provide free political and economic intelligence to help investors gain a greater understanding of world events and the impact they have on certain regions and sectors. Visit: http://www.oilprice.com

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • Haiti Schools Reopen For First Time Since Earthquake

    Haiti schools reopen for first time since quake

    By Jorge Saenz, AP

    Elene attends a math class at the Bom Berger Baptist School, Cite Soleil slum, Port-au-Prince, Monday, April 5. Schools are opening across Haiti’s capital for the first time since a devastating earthquake hit nearly three months ago

    PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti (AP) — The official reopening of schools among the ruins of Haiti’s capital brought unbridled joy Monday to students like 12-year-old Moris Rachelle.

    After nearly three months on the streets with nothing to do but help her mother look after two younger brothers, Moris wore white ribbons in her hair as she ran, laughed and hugged friends she had not seen since the Jan. 12 catastrophic earthquake.

    “All my friends are here,” she gushed, smiling broadly. “I’m happy they are not under the rubble.”

    Registration for the academic year provided a major step toward normalcy for Haiti’s children, and offered the first sense for how many of them have survived.

    But Haiti’s hard-hit education system is just beginning to recover.

    MORE: Haiti to use quake rubble in capital’s rebuilding

    The yard at Moris’ public school in the western Carrefour-Feuilles district of Port-au-Prince remained covered with smashed concrete, glass, torn notebook paper. Parents did not want their children to enter a pair of concrete buildings still standing for fear they might give way from damage or an aftershock.

    And there was no sign of the tents promised by the Education Ministry in sight, so the school eventually sent all the students home until next Monday.

    Only a few hundred schools are expected to open this week in a country where the quake destroyed some 4,000 schools. Many are waiting for tents to teach under because nobody wants to put children back under concrete roofs.

    Some community-led learning centers already opened in homeless camps, but there had been no formal education in the capital until Monday, said Edward Carwardine, a UNICEF spokesman in Port-au-Prince. He said it was impossible to say how many schools reopened Monday.

    About 40% of schools in the hard-hit southern city of Jacmel have reopened.

    At Moris Rachelle’s school, as many as 100 of its roughly 1,000 students died in the quake, including some buried in the rubble of an unfinished, six-story hospital that collapsed onto the yard during afternoon classes.

    The only way to know for sure who survived was to write down students’ names as they filed in Monday. Student council member Chilet Louis, a volunteer registering a line of arrivals in blue school uniforms, said it was his first time back since he helped pull bodies from the rubble that afternoon.

    “It’s good to see life starting again, but I also knew a lot of the kids who died,” said Louis, a 22-year-old high school junior at the public Jean Jacque Dessaline school.

    Educators say the regular curriculum will wait while they address the trauma of the disaster.

    Administrators took groups of older students aside to talk about the quake. Without any psychologists available, they used a form of group therapy.

    One by one, the students stood up and described their experiences of Jan. 12. One girl said she was so startled by the bodies on the streets that she didn’t eat, bathe or sleep for two days. Another said she survived only because she left her neighbor’s house for an errand a moment before it collapsed, killing everyone inside.

    The group applauded after each student spoke.

    The magnitude-7 quake that killed a government-estimated 230,000 people left the education system to start from scratch. The Education Ministry and all its records were destroyed, and more than 700 teacher and staff were killed along with an estimated 4,000 students.

    Schools are expected to open gradually across the quake zone, with the goal of having 700,000 children back in school by the middle of May, said Mohamed Fall, UNICEF’s chief educational official in Haiti. The school year has been extended until August to make up for lost time.

    Even before the quake, the system was in disarray. Only half of school-age children were enrolled and the government was unable to support more than a handful of schools, leaving a void filled by for-profit schools with fees that put them beyond the reach of many Haitians.

    Many Haitian children leave school to work at a young age. Others are sent by their families to work as servants in more affluent households.

    Fall said that as part of the quake recovery, the Haitian government and aid groups are developing strategies to extend education to children who had been excluded.

    “We want to build back better,” he said.

    For now, he said, the immediate priorities are to clear rubble away to make room for classes, assure parents that students will not be kept anywhere near unstable buildings and ensure a minimum of sanitation for children who are often homeless.

    Despite the joy of Moris and her classmates, it was a nerve-racking day for parents facing their first separation from their children since the quake.

    Moris’ mother, 29-year-old Jerline Ceuid, said Moris could have walked on her own from the campsite outside their collapsed home but she wanted to check on the school. She was startled to see only the two single-story concrete schoolhouses.

    “If she went into those buildings, I think my heart would stop beating,” said Ceuid, who added that she has taught her daughter to avoid unstable buildings in case of aftershocks. “There is still danger.”

    A bulldozer and frontloader parked outside had cleared a path from the street to the school, but the yard was still covered with rubble, including a pair of dusty children’s shoes.

  • Small talk, big gains?

    Adapted from “The Final Word on Small Talk,” by Guhan Subramanian (professor, Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School), first published in the Negotiation newsletter.

    According to conventional wisdom, small talk builds rapport and gets both sides a better deal in the end. But in fact, the question of whether to engage in small talk can be highly context-specific. New York City investment bankers, for example, tend to be far less likely than Texas oil executives to engage in small talk at the outset of a negotiation.

    So, rather than adopting a blanket rule when deciding whether to engage in small talk, be responsive to the context. Consider the location of the interaction—your office, their office, or somewhere else? Because you have more control over the pace and substance when meeting on your turf, you should be more willing to use small talk to build rapport. If you’re meeting in their territory instead, look for context clues: Does your counterpart ask whether you’d like some coffee or immediately direct you to your chair? The former situation is clearly more conducive to small talk than the latter; in fact, trying to engage in small talk may irritate your counterpart in the second scenario. Also consider body language: Are you sitting together on a couch, or is your counterpart sitting at his desk with you across from him? Again, the former scenario invites small talk; the latter does not.

    The substance of small talk matters as well. Suppose that you are waiting for your counterpart in her office, and the diplomas hanging on the wall tell you that you both graduated from the same small college in New England, three years apart. In fact, you dropped your son off at the same school two weeks ago. This coincidence is likely to forge a connection, even if other factors argue against small talk. Yet complimenting your counterpart on her beautiful family based on some framed photos might be a mistake if the context does not otherwise invite small talk.

    One last point: Even when you skip small talk at the outset, always remain open to opportunities for making connections with the other party. Take the recent example of a diplomat who was negotiating a high-stakes treaty with representatives from another country. After more than a week of slow progress, the diplomat noted on a Wednesday that he would need to return home on Friday afternoon for an evening at the opera with his wife. Immediately, a connection was formed on two fronts: a shared dislike of opera and a shared interest in keeping spouses happy. This casual exchange altered the tone of the negotiation. The pace picked up, and the diplomat went home as scheduled on Friday afternoon—with a signed agreement in hand.

  • Pick the right agent

    Adapted from “When You Shouldn’t Go It Alone,” by Lawrence Susskind (professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology), first published in the Negotiation newsletter.

    So, you’ve decided to use an agent in your next negotiation. Now what?

    It’s important not to rush headlong into the process of choosing an agent—picking the first one you speak to, for example, and sending him off to talks the next day. You need to choose your agent carefully, then establish a clear, detailed understanding of each other’s responsibilities and expectations. The following are critical steps in picking an agent and negotiating his contract.

    1. Examine your potential agent’s reputation closely. When choosing an agent, put your needs first. Agents specialize in different fields and have known reputations—differences that can improve or diminish your chances of getting your desired outcomes. You might choose a particular agent because of her previous success negotiating with others in situations similar to yours. Or you might pick someone based on the strong working relationship he has with someone you know. Analyze agents’ reputations from many angles, while factoring in the particulars of your upcoming negotiation.
    2. Clearly communicate your agent’s responsibilities. After you’ve chosen an agent, it’s time to write out the responsibilities you do and don’t want her to handle. Start by ranking your interests and sharing this list with your agent. A professional athlete might put “performance incentives” at the top of his list as his agent prepares to negotiate his new contract. If the player’s performance has declined recently, he might feel uncomfortable asking team owners for such upside benefits on his own. The player should also specify the degree of authority the agent does and doesn’t have at various stages in the negotiation process. The agent might have a great deal of latitude early on but need verbal authorization from the player as the deal solidifies.
      Negotiators often wonder whether they should give their agents a broad or narrow zone of agreement in which to settle. Allowing your agent to explore a broad range of alternatives makes sense, as long as she does not have the authority to make final commitments—which should always be yours to make.
    3. Link agent compensation to performance. As the “principal,” you may want to include a provision in your agent’s contract that ties his compensation to the achievement of certain negotiation milestones or results. In any circumstance, it is crucial that you ensure that your agent’s interests are tightly aligned with your own. This might mean holding your agent responsible not just for the dollar value of the deal, but also for the quality of the working relationship between you and the other side in the wake of the negotiation.

    In some negotiations, you may want to involve an agent just to bring fresh eyes to the situation. This may mean that an agent’s work is “front-loaded” during your own preparations or during an initial brainstorming session with the other side. Keep in mind that when it comes time to accept or reject an offer, negotiators often defer too readily to their agents. If you want your agent to disengage at some point in the process, express that caveat clearly in the contract.

  • Hyrbid Sales Fall in Comparison to Light Vehicles in March 2010

    prius 2010.jpg

    With gas prices remaining somewhat steady during the Obama administration, consumers are not rushing out to buy hybrids. Autobloggreen explains:

    The numbers are in for Mach sales and hybrids have fared well compared to last year. Hybrid automakers can’t heave a sigh of relief quite yet, because sales have fallen short of the overall industry rise compared to a year ago. The numbers show that hybrid sales are up 18 percent from last March, while light vehicle sales rose 25 percent. Hybrid sales were also below expectations. It’s likely that strong incentives for traditional cars and a rebounding economy drove buyers towards conventionally powered vehicles.

    The Toyota Prius, despite recall issues by the automaker, still remains the golden child of the hybrid market dominating 53 percent of sales. The Honda Insight is also very popular tripling their sales from one year ago.


  • Compare and contrast

    Adapted from “What Makes Negotiators Happy?” First published in the Negotiation newsletter.

    We all know that people have a strong need to compare their outcomes with those of others. So a negotiator’s mostly likely target of social comparison is her opponent, right?

    Maybe not. Nathan Novemsky of the Yale School of Management and Maurice E. Schweitzer of the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School conducted a series of studies examining the effect of internal social comparison (comparisons made with a negotiation counterpart) and external social comparison (comparisons with others outside one’s own negotiation) on negotiator satisfaction. Their surprising conclusion: external social comparisons affect satisfaction more than internal social comparisons.

    Why? Consider that, in the real world, buyers’ and sellers’ vastly different roles make performance comparisons difficult. A purchasing agent for an HMO, for instance, cannot compare her results to those of her negotiating partner, a salesperson from a pharmaceutical firm. But she could easily compare how much she paid for a particular drug with the price obtained by another purchasing agent.

    Negotiator satisfaction affects the likelihood that the other side will do business with you in the future, fully honor the contract, and act in good faith. How does social comparison on price affect negotiator satisfaction? Novemsky and Schweitzer warn that you’re unlikely to ensure customer satisfaction simply by explaining that you earned only a moderate profit from the deal. If your counterpart later finds out that his competitors paid less, he’s likely to be dissatisfied—and to avoid negotiating with you in the future.

    Of course, price is the easiest basis for comparison in negotiation. Customers are far more likely to compare themselves with others on price than on a host of other important dimensions, such as timing of delivery, payment schedule, servicing of the contract, and so on. For this reason, you’d be well advised to ensure that customers won’t receive bad news when they compare prices with those outside the negotiation.

  • Gates’ 2008 Nuke Speech vs. 2010 Nuclear Posture Review

    At noon in the Pentagon briefing room, flanked by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Energy Secretary Steven Chu and Adm. Mike Mullen, Defense Secretary Robert Gates will unveil a Nuclear Posture Review that rejects U.S. nuclear retaliation for a non-nuclear strike. It’s a consensus administration document. Which means Gates may have to explain whether or how his thinking changed from an October 2008 speech he gave to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace about what he called “realistic” nuclear policy.

    Gates gave the speech back when he figured he was retiring from government service and felt that he should outline a series of policy measures his successors might find fruitful. In a couple of months, of course, he’d be asked to join an administration that saw eye to eye with him on most issues and valued his insights in areas of disagreement. Nuclear strategy falls into the latter category.

    For instance, here’s Gates on the value nuclear weapons pose in deterring a chemical or biological attack:

    As long as other states have or seek nuclear weapons – and potentially can threaten us, our allies, and friends – then we must have a deterrent capacity that makes it clear that challenging the United States in the nuclear arena – or with other weapons of mass destruction – could result in an overwhelming, catastrophic response. …

    Our nuclear arsenal also helps deter enemies from using chemical and biological weapons. In the first Gulf War, we made it very clear that if Saddam used chemical or biological weapons, then the United States would keep all options on the table. We later learned that this veiled threat had the intended deterrent effect as Iraq considered its options.

    He also urged policymakers to consider the changing parameters of attacks that might prompt a nuclear reprisal. While not giving an answer, Gates pointed to the emerging threat of cyberattack as something to consider. “Similarly, future administrations will have to consider new declaratory policies about what level of cyber-attack might be considered an act of war – and what type of military response is appropriate,” he said. The Obama administration has now given its answer, and it’s that a non-nuclear response will be appropriate.

    A good chunk of the speech is about the virtues of the Reliable Replacement Warhead, a program that others in the Obama administration view as skirting too close to building new nukes. Josh Rogin reports that the NPR will “thread the needle” on modernizing the nuclear stockpile (which is how Gates views the RRW) without committing to the program.

    It’s no secret that Gates is on the rightward edge of the nuclear strategy debate in the administration. But there are areas in Gates’ 2008 speech where disagreement with the 2010 NPR is really just a matter of emphasis. Gates’ defense of conventional forces from 2008, for instance, will be largely codified by today’s document:

    A conventional strike force means that more targets are vulnerable without our having to resort to nuclear weapons. And missile defenses reinforce deterrence and minimize the benefits of rogue nations investing heavily in ballistic missiles:  They won’t know if their missiles will be effective, thus other nations will feel less threatened. And let’s not forget the deterrent value of other parts of our conventional military forces.

    Gates speaks at noon. It’ll be instructive to hear how he describes his current thinking on nuclear strategy, and whether he addresses his older comments about it.

  • Disaster-stricken West Virginia coal mine has a history of trouble

    In the worst disaster to strike the U.S. coal mining industry in a quarter-century, 25 miners have been confirmed dead so far from an explosion that occurred yesterday afternoon at the Upper Big Branch Mine in Raleigh County, W.Va., about 30 miles south of the state capital of Charleston.

    Share/Bookmark

    Four miners remain missing, but rescue efforts were called off earlier today due to poor conditions inside the underground mine, where it’s believed a spark from a rail car used to transport workers may have ignited a build-up of methane gas. Rescue teams are now drilling holes in an effort to try to get more oxygen inside.

    The mine — operated by Performance Coal Co., a subsidiary of Richmond, Va.-based Massey Energy, the largest coal producer in Central Appalachia — has a history of problems since it began operations in 1994.

    They include the previous deaths of three workers. In 1998, a contractor was killed at the mine when a support beam collapsed. In 2001, a miner died after a portion of the roof fell on him, and an electrician was electrocuted while repairing a shuttle car in 2003.

    In addition, 177 miners and 52 contractors have suffered injuries at Upper Big Branch, according to data from the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration.

    The facility, which employs about 200 non-union miners, has also faced numerous regulatory citations and orders over the years — 3,011 through 2009, with a peak of 515 last year alone. So far this year, the mine has already racked up 124 citations and orders, as shown in these tables from the MSHA website (click on image to see a larger version):

    upper-big-branch-injuries-deaths.png
    upper-big-branch-citations.pngMassey has a history of serious problems at other mines as well. In 2008 the company’s Aracoma Coal subsidiary pleaded guilty to 10 criminal charges including a felony count in connection with a 2006 fire at a mine in Logan County, W.Va. that killed two miners. The company admitted to failing to provide a proper escape tunnel, not conducting required evacuation drills and falsifying a record book so it appeared the drills had been done.

    The possibility that a methane build-up was behind the Upper Big Branch explosion raises the specters of the 2006 disasters at the Sago and Darby mines in West Virginia and Kentucky, which killed 17 people. In response to those tragedies, regulators vowed to examine safety concerns in sealed areas of mines where the explosive gas can build up. Among the previous violations at Upper Big Branch was the failure to properly vent methane gas.  

    The area where the mine is located is represented in Congress by Rep. Nick Rahall, a Democrat. He has promised a thorough investigation into what caused the disaster.

    “We will look for inadequacies in the law and enforcement practices, and I will work to fix any we find,” he said. “We will scrutinize the health and safety violations at this mine to see whether the law was circumvented and miners precious lives were willfully put at risk, and there will be accountability.”

    U.S. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis also pledged to take action. “Twenty-five hardworking men died needlessly in a mine yesterday. I pledge that their deaths will not be in vain,” she said. “The federal Mine Safety and Health Administration will investigate this tragedy, and take action. Miners should never have to sacrifice their lives for their livelihood.”

    The Upper Big Branch disaster is the deadliest accident in a U.S. mine since December 1984, when 27 workers were killed in a fire at the Wilberg Mine in Orangeville, Utah.

    The type of coal mining being done at Upper Big Branch is what’s known as longwall mining, a highly productive method that uses enormous machines to extract coal quickly and cheaply. However, as documented in a Center for Public Integrity investigation, the method has significant social and environmental costs.

    One of the four men still missing was thought to have been operating longwall mining equipment deep inside the mine, the Charleston Gazette reports.

  • Se endurecen las leyes norteamericanas de consumo de combustible

    En el año 2016, todos los vehículos que sean vendidos en Estados Unidos, deberán tener un consumo medio de 6,60 Litros/100 Km según a dictado el gobierno norteamericano en el día de ayer.

    Surtidor de Combustible

    Según se calcula, esta ley acarreará que los vehículos cuesten un promedio de 1.000$ más aunque los consumidores recuperarán dicho dinero al no tener que repostar más a menudo.

    Por otra parte, un ejecutivo de la asociación de constructores norteamericanos afirmó que “ya que la gente está soportando presupuestos modestos y unas condiciones laborales precarias, querrán pagar menos y no más por sus gastos de transportación, sin tener que soportar leyes más redundantes y más burocracia”.

    Related posts:

    1. GP de Japón, cargas de combustible publicadas
    2. Obama impone un veto a los grandes cilindradas
    3. El precio de los coches usados desciende en Agosto
  • Yamaha Rhino Wrongful Death Suit Filed by Parents of Two Young Girls

    The families of two 11-year-old Mississippi girls have filed a lawsuit over alleged design defects with the Yamaha Rhino, claiming that the side-by-side vehicle is inherently unstable and caused an ATV rollover accident that claimed the lives of both girls. The Yamaha Rhino wrongful death suit joins hundreds of other similar claims alleging severe and sometimes fatal injuries were caused when the ATV tipped over, often at slow speeds on relatively flat surfaces.

    The parents of Emily Ann Bates and Lauren Elizabeth Dilworth filed the complaint last Wednesday in Gwinnett County, Georgia, the location of the home offices of Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corp. of America. The wrongful death lawsuit says the two girls died on October 18, 2008 in DeSoto County, Mississippi when their Rhino flipped over while being operated at low speed.

    According to the complaint, the 1,000 pound vehicle rolled over onto the two six graders, killing Dilworth instantly and pinning Bates, causing severe trauma to her head. Bates was rushed to Baptist-DeSoto Hospital in Southaven, where she was pronounced dead.

    The lawsuit is the most recent of several hundred Yamaha Rhino lawsuits that have been filed throughout the United States. The lawsuits all have similar allegations that the design problems with the Yamaha Rhino make the vehicle prone to rollover, sometimes at speeds as slow as 13 miles per hour on flat pavement.

    All federal Yamaha Rhino cases have been centralized for pretrial proceedings as part of an MDL, or multidistrict litigation, before Judge Jennifer B. Coffman in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. The first Yamaha Rhino trials in the MDL, which are known as “bellwether” cases because they are used to gauge how jurors will respond to evidence that will be presented throughout the litigation, are scheduled to begin in October 2010.

    The latest lawsuit says that the Yamaha Rhino was defectively designed, leading to an unstable vehicle in which some of the safety measures, such as the roll cage, are more likely to cause severe injury than prevent it. The lawsuit alleges that there have been at least 59 Yamaha Rhino deaths.

    Yamaha officials point out that the vehicles’ safety recommendations call for drivers to be at least 16-years-old and licensed. They also recommend wearing a helmet and seat belt.

    Last August, a Texas state court jury found that Yamaha was not liable for the wrongful death of a 13 year-old boy in a Yamaha Rhino accident suit filed by his parents. In that case, the jury decision was based on the individual circumstances of that accident, including the fact that the teenage boy was driving a Rhino that had been modified and his father testified that he was not wearing a helmet when the vehicle flipped and crushed him.

  • Fed Research Looks at Difficulties Gauging Inflation Expectations

    Federal Reserve officials have long argued that keeping inflation expectations under control allows them to control the actual level of inflation.

    But new research Monday from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas argues that there isn’t any good way yet to derive from financial markets where long-run inflation expectations actually lie. This suggests that, when central-bank officials describe long-run inflation expectations as well contained, as they do these days, those conclusions are based more on art than on science.

    The paper was written by Carlos E.J.M. Zarazaga. To reach his conclusion, the economist looked at the message offered by the “forward rates” method, which relies on government bond yields. Treasurys of all maturities are sensitive to inflation worries, but they are also sensitive to other types of risk. The problem is that the interplay of those factors is hard to disentangle.

    “The disturbing property of risk premia that move around over time is that they can severely distort popular inflation-expectations indicators,” Zarazaga wrote. This means that market-based models “could give the wrong impression that long-run inflation expectations have switched dangerously to a deflationary mood when, in reality, that is a mirage produced by declining risk premia,” he wrote.

    The economic profession hasn’t yet figured out how to deal with the problem. “Some time will pass before many of the remaining theoretical and empirical issues relevant to the construction of reliable long-run inflation-expectations indicators are sorted out,” Zarazaga noted. “Policymakers are well advised not to attribute the relatively ample fluctuations observed in popular long-run inflation expectations indicators to actual changes in those expectations,” he wrote.

    The paper’s findings put the Fed in a bit of a pickle, especially now. Actual levels of inflation are low and have been trending lower for some time due to weak demand and high unemployment. Key Fed officials think that the gap between actual and potential inflation means the economy will continue to see low inflation.

    What’s more, most believe the general public and investors aren’t expecting any break-out in inflation, either. The mid-March Federal Open Market Committee statement described inflation expectations as “stable.” New York Fed President William Dudley last week described inflation expectations as “well contained.”

    How does the Fed reach this conclusion? Officials look at long-term bond yields and how investors are pricing inflation-indexed bonds. Officials can also look to surveys of consumer confidence such as the Reuters/University of Michigan consumer-sentiment index. All of those measures appear to back up the Fed’s view.

    That could change, however. Long-term bond yields are on the rise. Much of that is attributable to heavy levels of government debt supply, but there is likely an inflation component in there, given the economic recovery and the chance that better demand and more hiring will eventually push prices higher.

    The Fed’s massive balance sheet also presents an inflation risk. The central bank has more than doubled the size of its balance sheet over the course of the financial crisis, to more than $2 trillion. Officials count on their ability to pay interest on reserves to keep much of that money out of the economy, and thus blunt the inflationary impact of banks’ massive hoard of cash.

    Much of the ability to control the inflation implications of that hoard rests on investor confidence that the Fed will do its job. Some Fed officials have already worried about the longer-run inflation risk of the balance sheet. Whatever clues Fed officials can get about inflation expectations has a lot to say about the success of managing the balance sheet.

    The Dallas Fed paper suggests that this process may be harder than many now believe, given the difficulty of getting a meaningful signal on the outlook for inflation.


  • Palm drops advertising agency

    Creepy Palm woman

    Finally.  After months of seeing a creepy pale woman advertise a great smartphone, Palm has terminated their agreement with ad agency Modernista.  According to AdAge, the company is in talks with other advertising companies, though no deals have been reached as of yet.  While most are billing this as one of Palm’s smartest business moves, I’m going to go out on a limb and say that this is the smartest move they’ve done to date.  Advertising is a company’s first line of defense against competitors, and let’s be honest – the advertising to date was terrible.

    What say you?  Happy to see the end of the pale woman, or sad to see her go?  Sound off in the comments!

    Via Engadget


  • Why You Should NEVER Listen to Your Customers

    An article by John Doerr had a great quote from technology luminary Alan Kay that every entrepreneur needs to remember “The best way to predict the future is to invent it.

    I’m working with a company that at one point had a product that was not only best in class, but also technically far ahead of its competition.  It created a better way of offering its service and customers loved it and paid for it. Then it made a fatal  mistake.  It asked its customers what features they wanted to see in the product and they delivered on those features. Unfortunately for this company, its competitors didn’t ask customers what they wanted. Instead, they had a vision of ways that business could be done differently and as a result better.  Customers didn’t really see the value or need, until they saw the product.  When they tried it , they loved it.

    So what did my company do when they saw what their competitor had done ? They repeated their mistake and once again asked their customers what they wanted in the product. Of course the customer responded with features that they now loved from the other product.

    They didn’t improve their competitive positioning. They put themselves in a never ending revolving door of trying to respond to customer requests. To make matters worse, resources and brainpower that could be applied to “inventing the future” were instead being used to catch up with features that locked them into the past.

    Entrepreneurs always need to be reminded that its not the job of their customers to know what they don’t know. In other words, your customers have a tough enough time doing their jobs. They don’t spend time trying to reinvent their industries or how their jobs are performed. Sure, every now and then you come across an exception. But you can’t bet the company on your finding that person at one of your customers.

    Instead, part of every entrepreneurs job is to invent the future. I also call it “kicking your own ass”. Someone is out there looking to put you out of business. Someone is always out there who thinks they have a better idea than you have. A better solution than you have. A better or more efficient product than you have.  If there is someone out there who can “kick your ass” by doing it better, its part of your job as the owner of the company to stay ahead of them and “kick your own ass” before someone else does.

    Your customers can tell you the things that are broken and how they want to be made happen. Listen to them. Make them happy. But they won’t create the future roadmap for your product or service. That’s your job.

    The best way to predict the future is to invent it.  Words that should always be part of your product or service planning.