Blog

  • La Paloma | Complejo de Atijas Weiss | 4p | Pro

    El centro de La Paloma será testigo en este semestre de la construcción de un edificio de cuatro pisos y 36 apartamentos, a cargo del estudio Atijas Weiss. A este emprendimiento se le suman las 400 viviendas que tendrán las dos nuevas urbanizaciones en la laguna de Rocha y su principal balneario. Vito Atijas, director del estudio que ha promovido inversiones en Punta del Este y Montevideo, afirmó a En Perspectiva que la oferta inmobiliaria en La Paloma está algo atrasada y señaló que en Rocha hay “mucho espacio ambiental” para un desarrollo ordenado del terreno. En tanto, sostuvo que en Punta del Este hay una notoria “saturación en el tráfico y en los servicios” y manifestó: “La presencia cada vez más imponente del cemento y los edificios modifica el panorama visual que hasta hace no tantos años se tenía”.

    JUAN ANDRÉS ELHORDOY (JAE):
    El turno de las grandes inversiones inmobiliarias llega a Rocha.

    Al millonario y conversado proyecto Las Garzas, del argentino Alejandro Constantini, se sumarán próximamente costosos emprendimientos.

    Por un lado, dos nuevas urbanizaciones de 1.000 y 900 hectáreas, que se ubicarán entre la laguna de Rocha y La Paloma, harán lugar a 400 viviendas. Y, por otro, un conjunto de hotel y edificio residencial, ambos de cuatro pisos, que se va a localizar muy cerca del centro del principal balneario rochense.

    ¿La ola expansiva de Punta del Este llega indefectiblemente a La Paloma y su zona de influencia? ¿La Paloma está en las puertas del despegue de inversiones inmobiliarias de gran valor?

    Vamos a conversar de estos y otros temas con uno de los promotores que protagonizan de esta movida.

    ***

    JAE – El diálogo será con el arquitecto Vito Atijas, director del estudio Atijas Weiss, que es uno de los promotores de inversiones de envergadura que van a comenzar en muy poco tiempo.

    Atijas Weiss tiene una larga historia de inversiones en Montevideo y Punta del Este. ¿Qué los llevó a dar este primer paso en Rocha, concretamente en La Paloma?

    VITO ATIJAS (VA):
    Seguramente ha influido un largo afecto que yo, personalmente, siento por Rocha, adonde no dejo de ir todos los veranos, aunque sea unos días, para reencontrarme con un tipo de veraneo distinto, con una cercanía más agreste, más presente del océano, y dentro de Rocha la posibilidad de, aun en uno de los lugares más conocidos, el que presenta mayor infraestructura como es La Paloma, recorrer los múltiples balnearios, algunos de mayor y otros de menor trascendencia pero todos ellos con el encanto particular de ese océano, que adquiere un protagonismo difícil de encontrar en otros lugares.

    EMILIANO COTELO (EC):
    Por ahí hay razones de tipo personal, sus propios gustos. Pero supongo que un negocio como este no se resuelve simplemente por ese tipo de motivo.

    VA – Algunas veces es el motor. Francamente, uniendo eso a mi profesión de arquitecto y habiendo encontrado un terreno que tiene características muy particulares, porque encontrándose sobre el eje de la calle principal, Avenida Solari, prácticamente se acerca al océano en forma inmediata; con la presencia del faro, que es protagonista, y uno de los puntos emblemáticos de Rocha, un excelente frente, parecía cantado que ahí se podía desarrollar un edificio que tuviera las características que se ofrecen en otro tipo de lugares, donde generalmente el público exige más cosas, en las que la oferta inmobiliaria de La Paloma quizá esté algo atrasada. Entonces hemos decidido, con el impulso de esa impronta personal, desarrollar este proyecto que lanzamos este verano a la consideración del mercado inmobiliario rochense, y en particular en La Paloma, que tiene su público desde hace muchísimo tiempo, no es que nosotros lo hayamos descubierto.

    JAE – Siguiendo con la estrategia que empieza a desplegar el estudio Atijas Weiss, cabe preguntar si esta no es una señal de posible saturación de Punta del Este y de necesidad de buscar alternativas a las que actualmente presenta el principal balneario.

    VA – Con toda honestidad puedo llegar a coincidir en el tema de al menos una luz amarilla que se prende en cuanto a saturación. Los que hemos venido a Punta del Este por razones primero de vacaciones y después laborales durante mucho tiempo notamos que el crecimiento edilicio trae consigo cosas buenas pero de las otras también. Una saturación que se produce en el tráfico, en los servicios, el embotellamiento que se produce en las horas pico para ir y volver de determinados lugares adonde parece que masivamente todo el mundo quiere ir y llegar a la misma hora. Con lo cual la presencia cada vez más imponente del cemento y los edificios modifican el panorama visual que hasta hace no tantos años se tenía en Punta del Este. Todo eso hace pensar que un determinado tipo de público puede llegar a buscar otras cosas. De ahí el crecimiento visual y efectivo hacia el este.

    EC – ¿Hay algo de autocrítica en ese análisis? Porque ustedes han sido protagonistas del empuje de las torres, por ejemplo.

    VA – Sí, le cuento una anécdota personal. Hace muy poquito asistí al concierto de Charly García en la playa de estacionamiento del Conrad. Ubicado ahí, entre el público mientras disfrutaba el espectáculo, empecé a mirar alrededor y a comparar lo que se veía y lo que se ve ahora simplemente levantando la vista. Y encontré un contraste tan grande entre lo que había visto hacía un tiempo, mirando campeonatos de tenis ahí o la actuación de artistas, y lo que actualmente se ve, que se lo comenté a varios amigos: cómo casi sin darse cuenta uno se enfrenta de repente a un marco totalmente diferente del que toda la vida disfrutó. Y pienso que eso que me ocurre a mí le puede ocurrir a mucha gente. No digo que a todos, porque hay muchos que disfrutan de ese tipo de vacaciones, con una variedad enorme de ofertas, de espectáculos, que no se siente demasiado molesta por todo lo que le dije. A toda esa gente Punta del Este le seguirá dando la respuesta esperada. Pero creo honestamente que hay una saturación, y se lo digo con la cuota de autocrítica que me pueda corresponder.

    JAE – ¿En ese sentido Rocha y La Paloma, en particular, aparece como opción? Además, ¿cuánto pesa en la decisión de invertir allí el eventual puente sobre la Laguna Garzón, que todavía está en trámite en la Dirección Nacional de Medioambiente? Por lo que se anuncia, en estas horas se presentaría un informe sobre el impacto ambiental del puente. ¿Qué importancia tiene?

    VA – En el caso personal de este emprendimiento le diría que ninguna, lo haría con o sin el puente sobre la Laguna Garzón. Naturalmente, bienvenida sea cualquier ayuda para que la gente se acerque más fácilmente a la zona. Pero uno de los encantos de la costa rochense es recorrerla quizá no en su recorrido más corto, sino adentrándose hasta los puntos que vinculan directamente a los pequeños balnearios, algunos de una enorme belleza, que sería una pena que se perdieran por una saturación edilicia, que al menos por ahora no se vislumbra. Créame que en este edificio, Vista Oceánica, no ha pesado para nada el tema del puente.

    JAE – Y viendo esto en perspectiva, ¿no se corre el riesgo de convertir a La Paloma, en particular, y Rocha, en general, en un departamento como Maldonado? Usted decía que le gusta La Paloma porque es agreste; es una característica, la rusticidad, el ambiente más familiar. ¿No se corre el riesgo, con las nuevas inversiones que están llegando al departamento, de perder esa mística o ese diferencial?

    VA – No creo. Hay mucho espacio ambiental como para que el desarrollo ordenadamente previsto de Rocha pueda tener todavía un futuro muy largo en el tiempo. Además, la extensión misma de la costa permite que eso ocurra. La Paloma, en particular, que es el que tiene mayor infraestructura turística, admite algún crecimiento todavía sin que se corran riesgos en lo que tiene que ver con su particularidad. Lo que tiene de lindo La Paloma es, como le decía a la gente de la televisión y la prensa de Rocha, que uno da vuelta la esquina y se encuentra con el océano que prácticamente golpea la vista. Y eso no se va a perder porque hay zonas enteras donde la altura está limitada y debe seguir así.

    JAE – Hay un solo edificio en La Paloma.

    VA – Sí, un viejo edificio, muy visible desde largas distancias, que hizo tiempo atrás un amigo mío…

    EC – …Un edificio que desentona, que desafina en La Paloma, que queda raro.

    VA – Sí, queda raro, pero de todas maneras, no me molesta. He tenido la suerte, gracias a su constructor, que es amigo mío, el señor Niver Benencio, de haber ocupado un apartamento. La vista es realmente espectacular. Sería muy malo que se saturara y hubiera más edificios de esa altura y de esas características…

    EC – …Ahora está regulada la altura en La Paloma.

    VA – Está regulada, se está estudiando la posibilidad de aumentar la altura en algunos tramos de la calle Solari, que puede ser el eje vertebrador hacia un lado y otro de La Paloma, que tiene construcciones que se caracterizan por ser bajas, con niveles que en general no superan los dos pisos, máximo tres o cuatro.

    JAE – ¿Habría mercado para la construcción de edificios más altos?

    VA – No le sé decir. Honestamente, no he pensado tanto en si el mercado va a responder o no; naturalmente que espero que lo haga. Estoy decidido a impulsar este proyecto para que La Paloma cuente con un edificio, que, sin desentonar y totalmente adaptado a la reglamentación edilicia, ofrezca una serie de servicios que mejoren la calidad de vida del turista, que, por el tiempo que sea, haga su presencia allí. En ese sentido, tampoco es exagerado lo que ofrecemos: es una piscina cerrada, una piscina abierta, gimnasio, barbacoa, salas de reuniones, y un diseño muy atento a los espacios interiores, que en general apuntan a atender a las familias chicas, con no más de dos hijos. Son apartamentos básicamente de uno y dos dormitorios, todos con cocina, baño y de dimensiones adaptadas a un tipo de arquitectura que queremos que se integre naturalmente al balneario.

    JAE – ¿A quiénes está dirigido el emprendimiento?

    VA – Está dirigido a aquellos que aman la costa de Rocha, que vienen a veces y se encuentran con amplias posibilidades en materia de alquilar casas, pero no apartamentos. Les ofrecemos las ventajas de un edificio atractivo, muy bien ubicado, y que además, brinda una cantidad de servicios compartidos con el resto de los propietarios o de los usuarios, que va a tener el funcionamiento de una posada integrada al conjunto…

    JAE – …¿Piensan en un público uruguayo, en un público brasileño, en un público argentino?

    VA – Por lo que hemos hablado con las principales inmobiliarias de Rocha, el público está integrado por argentinos, brasileños cada vez más, pero también por uruguayos que a lo mejor encuentran en esa oferta una respuesta a inquietudes para las que hoy no tienen respuesta inmobiliaria.

    EC – Desde la audiencia le preguntan si este proyecto tiene algo que ver con el proyecto del puerto de aguas profundas, que eventualmente estaría ubicado en La Paloma.

    VA – Sí, tiene algo que ver porque está muy cerca; es todo lo que le puedo decir. Todo lo que haga que La Paloma crezca, pero crezca bien, dentro de sus posibilidades naturales; ahora no vamos a descubrir el puerto de La Paloma, por supuesto. Todo ayuda, en la medida que agrega atractivos o da respuesta a necesidades que el balneario o ese pequeño enclave urbano que es La Paloma tiene. Pero no más allá de eso…

    EC – …¿Ustedes preveían el movimiento del nuevo puerto como parte del negocio?

    VA – Lógico, sí, por eso le decía que el complejo está integrado básicamente por un bloque que da a la calle del Sol, que es la primera paralela a Solari, y al faro. Ahí va a haber una pequeña posada con 16 ó 20 habitaciones, que va a prestar servicios básicamente hoteleros o parahoteleros. El uso de eso se puede extender a los apartamentos que dan a la calle Solari, cuyos propietarios tendrán la oportunidad, en los períodos en que no usen la unidad, de darla a la administración de la posada que se encargará de tratar de agregarle rentabilidad a la inversión. En su inmensa mayoría son unidades de dos ambientes con cocina, un dormitorio y un estar que puede servir como dormitorio agregado. Todo con los servicios que mencioné, y servicio de mucama opcional incluido: todo lo que el turista medio puede desear para pasar sus vacaciones sin complicarse demasiado la vida.

    EC – ¿Cuál es el límite de altura?

    VA – Son cuatro niveles, planta baja y cuatro pisos, para no exceder lo que permite la ordenanza, y a eso nos hemos atenido con absoluta certeza.

    JAE – Pero usted decía que eso está en revisión.

    VA – Tengo entendido que está en revisión en alguna zona de la calle Solari, no precisamente en las más cercanas al océano, lo cual está muy bien. Pero para darle un cierto impulso edilicio, porque la gente que decide invertir en un determinado lugar tiene que tener incentivos para hacerlo, que pasan por lo económico.

    Pensamos que es una medida acertada en la medida que no cambie la fisonomía básica del balneario, que es lo que le da su atractivo, que se extiende a algo que está a siete kilómetros, La Pedrera, otro lugar excepcional. Y a partir de ahí, La Aguada, Aguas Dulces, toda la costa rochense, que es de un enorme atractivo.

    EC – La inversión es de dos millones de dólares.

    VA – La inversión va a estar en ese orden, quizás un poquito más si se toma en cuenta el equipamiento de la parte hotelera y algunos servicios que se van a brindar. Pero puede estar en ese orden, incluido el valor del terreno.

    EC – Las obras empiezan ahora nomás; ¿cuándo terminan?

    VA – Estimamos que la ejecución global de la obra no debería llevar más de 18 meses a partir de su comienzo efectivo, que esperemos que sea en el primer semestre de este año.

    ***

    EC – De la audiencia llega una cantidad de mensajes y buena parte de ellos con una advertencia, con un reclamo de que no se construya más en el caso concreto de La Paloma: “Por favor, así está bien, dejen en paz al departamento”, señala por ejemplo Francisco, de Ciudad Vieja.

    VA – No estamos, para nada, alterando la paz. Nos ajustamos estrictamente a lo que la ordenanza permite, no hemos pedido absolutamente nada que se salga de esa norma; somos más que respetuosos. Y además, coincido totalmente con lo que puedan escribir en cuanto a la defensa del valor natural de La Paloma y los demás balnearios rochenses. Estoy plenamente convencido de que hay una gran posibilidad de que se pierda ese atractivo en la medida en que se abran las compuertas en forma indiscriminada, en lo que tiene que ver con un desarrollo de construcciones que lo alteren. Créanme todos que no es mi intención, todo lo contrario. Estamos seguros de que este edificio, que se ubicaría donde hoy hay una pequeña casa, pegado al Banco de la República, frente al hotel Cabo Santa María, prácticamente al lado del faro, en nada va alterar la fisonomía actual de La Paloma.

    ***

    JAE – A este emprendimiento que se va a iniciar con la construcción de este edificio de lujo de cuatro pisos se suman dos nuevas urbanizaciones de 1.000 y 900 hectáreas que se van a ubicar entre la laguna de Rocha y La Paloma.

    A su vez, según se anuncia, por ejemplo en una nota en El Observador de estos días, estos proyectos se van a sumar a otro, al millonario, al conversado proyecto Las Garzas, del argentino Alejandro Constantini.

    ¿Hay otras zonas del departamento de Rocha que revisten interés para un desarrollador inmobiliario como su empresa?

    VA – Sí, tenemos la posibilidad de ampliar, siempre dentro de las condicionantes que mencionamos, a algún balneario vecino. En ese sentido, todavía sin una cosa fija o predeterminada, estamos analizando algunas propuestas que nos han llegado, y una vez analizadas veremos si se pueden concretar. Pero respondo afirmativamente a su pregunta en cuanto a que quizá no nos limitemos a esta iniciativa, sino que quizá encontremos en algunos otros lugares de la costa rochense algún punto de interés para el desarrollo turístico.

    JAE – Esto da pie a una afirmación contundente en cuanto a que su estudio abre como una alternativa el departamento de Rocha, este caso particular no es un hecho aislado.

    VA – Sí, abre una perspectiva, pero le aclaro que si nos tuviéramos que quedar en esta única iniciativa, no vamos a dejar de cumplirla y honrarla con todo el cuidado y el respeto que nos merecen el departamento y la costa rochenses. Insisto en que en este caso ha habido un fuerte impulso personal, una impronta personal; yo hace muchísimo tiempo que voy por lo menos dos o tres días a Rocha, y en general me quedo en La Paloma en lugares muy próximos a donde vamos a construir ahora. Por lo tanto, hay una carga personal, compartida por mi socio pero básicamente personal.

    JAE – ¿Estos planes implican ir por el lado de viviendas de lujo como las que van a ofrecer a partir de ahora?

    VA – No sé a qué apuntan cuando dicen “de lujo”. Parece que se entiende por lujo que el usuario o el propietario de esos pequeños apartamentos –que básicamente son del orden de 50 a 55 metros cuadrados, siendo los de dos dormitorios, los mayores, de menos de 80– tenga algunas comodidades básicas compartidas –que no constituyen algo desequilibrante– por todo el edificio…

    JAE – …Básicamente el servicio, la piscina externa, la piscina interna; eso no es común en Rocha.

    VA – Estoy de acuerdo, pero en la azotea, por ejemplo, que es un nivel generalmente no aprovechable de una vivienda, hemos decidido implantar, para uso de todos los propietarios, una barbacoa con una piscina, un deck y un solarium para aprovechar la mejor vista que tiene el edificio. Los 36 apartamentos que entre los dos bloques va a tener el Vista Oceánica van a aprovechar esa hermosa vista desde el punto donde la mejor se la aprecia, que es el nivel más alto del edificio, donde hay una barbacoa muy abierta pero techada para que se pueda usar todo el año, con una piscina que será aprovechada solamente cuando el clima lo permita. Y además, tenemos en planta baja servicios que tampoco son desequilibrantes, pero que son importantes. Por ejemplo, si usted va en invierno a La Paloma y se quiere dar un bañito en agua climatizada, tendrá su piscina; hay un gimnasio –hoy se brinda mucha atención a la parte física–, una sala para que los chicos jueguen, un lugar donde mirar televisión en un plasma y jugar a las cartas. Todo eso, en áreas que de cualquier manera, por estar techadas por debajo del nivel del primer piso, se tiene igual; el asunto es aprovecharlas de la mejor manera para que el edificio goce de ese confort que tiene que tener.

    JAE – Quiero preguntarle por las inversiones en Uruguay y el ciclo económico global que se está registrando en materia de viviendas.

    Por ejemplo, JP Morgan tiene un fondo de inversión en Real Estate, Estados Unidos, y hay grandes fondos internacionales que están recomendando, como forma de aprovechar el nuevo ciclo alcista de los inmuebles en Estados Unidos, volcarse a adquirir baratas las propiedades en ese país para luego venderlas caras. Esto sería un cambio con respecto al desplome que sufrieron Estados Unidos, España y otros países europeos. ¿Cómo se ubica esto? ¿Esto no afecta las perspectivas para el negocio en Uruguay?

    VA – Evidentemente, el que piensa que comprando hoy propiedades que han tenido precios muy importantes hace un tiempo y que hoy no los tienen, hace un buen negocio y está en condiciones de hacerlo, puede especular con que eso va a ocurrir y es legítimo que lo haga. En ese sentido, hay gente notoria que está comprando propiedades en la Florida, no sé si en España todavía, para aprovechar el ciclo bajista y después una eventual una suba…

    EC – …¿Esto no puede afectar las perspectivas para el desarrollo inmobiliario en Uruguay?

    VA – En general, el que compra en Uruguay no lo hace tanto con fines especulativos, sino con otro tipo de fines. No desdeña lo que puede ser una rentabilidad con un alquiler, básicamente compra para un destino prácticamente personal.

    Pienso que en ese sentido no afecta. Los que compran en Punta del Este y los que ahora muestran preferencia por lugares un poco más agrestes hacen pesar otros factores en la decisión de comprar una vivienda.

    Por otro lado, aun dentro de esa tendencia bajista, los precios siguen siendo superiores en esos mercados que usted menciona, tienen costos muy elevados de mantenimiento que cuando el mercado está difícil no permiten que uno se quede muy tranquilo y muy quieto esperando. Solamente lo puede hacer el que está sentado arriba de una fortuna y no le hace demasiado volcar una parte de su capital a ese tipo de inversiones especulativas.

    En el caso de Punta del Este creo que inciden otros factores, que tienen mucho que ver con que sin duda es el balneario regional más importante, y eso atrae a gente que lo quiere utilizar por sí misma y no con carácter meramente especulativo.

    http://espectador.com/1v4_contenido.php?id=171990&sts=1

  • Some Questions About “High Standards” in Trade Agreements

    I see a lot of talk these days by the Obama administration about "high standard" trade agreements (e.g., here).  They also refer to "21st century" trade agreements, presumably to convey a similar idea.

    So what do they mean by a "high standard" agreement?  The use of this phrase strikes me as akin to requirements of "fairness" and "reasonableness."  Is anyone really against any of this?  Is anyone for "unfairness" or "unreasonableness"?  Is anyone for "low standards"?

    With regard to the particular standards to be included in trade agreements, though, whether someone wants them to be high or low depends on what subject area we are talking about.  For labor and the environment, unions and environmental NGOs want them high, whereas many businesses prefer them to be low (or, even better, non-existent).  Conversely, for IP and investment, it is business groups that want them high, with unions and NGOs preferring them low (or non-existent).

    What I want to know is, what balance does the Obama administration hope to achieve here?  I'm pretty sure they would prefer labor and environment standards that are at least as high as in the most recent U.S. FTAs.  By contrast, I'm less clear about what they have in mind for IP and investment.  Will they push for strong IP protection and investor rights?  Or will they pull back?  And what about subjects such as food safety and health?

    All of this brings me to a letter from a number of members of the House Trade Working Group (a group of Representatives who are critical of existing trade agreements) to USTR Kirk, in reaction to the Obama Administration announcing that it would participate in the Trans-Pacific Partership (TPP) trade talks.  (I don't have a link for this letter yet, but will try to find one).  [UPDATE:  Here's the letter.]  As set out in the letter, here are some changes they would like to see in future trade agreements:

    Foreign investor rights: We believe the new American trade agreement model must no longer provide extraordinary foreign-investor privileges and private enforcement systems that promote offshoring and allow foreign investors to challenge our environmental, zoning, health and other public-interest policies in foreign tribunals. Many in Congress have expressed serious concern about past trade pact provisions that allow foreign investors to skirt our court system to sue the United States in World Bank and UN tribunals over regulatory polices that apply to domestic and foreign firms alike. In order to ensure that foreign investors do not have greater rights than U.S. investors and firms, the TPP's investment chapter should build off of the progress made in the Australia-U.S. FTA in addressing this congressional concern by similarly not providing for extrajudicial investor-state private enforcement rights for foreign investors.

    .. we oppose trade agreements' establishment of rights for foreign investors to obtain compensation from the U.S government for "regulatory takings" – takings compensation for the costs of regulatory compliance that would not be allowed under U.S. law. We also believe it is critical that any new Obama trade agreement repair provisions in previous FTAs that guarantee a "minimum standard of treatment" for foreign investors by making clear that this standard is limited to guarantees of procedural due process rather than creating new substantive propeliy rights for foreign firms. In addition, the TPP FTA must not include limits on capital controls and other policies countries may need to employ to counter financial and currency crises that have been included in past FTAs.

    Access to medicines. The patent provisions of the U.S. FTA with Peru provide a base on which further health-related protections can be built. We strongly believe trade agreements must work to ensure affordable access to medicines, and the Peru agreement addressed several of our long-standing concerns about the way that medicine patent related issues are dealt with in FTAs. Additional improvements, however, are still required. It is imperative that TPP patent rules do not undermine the flexibilities and rights included in the access to medicine polices that were agreed in the 2001 WTO Doha Declaration on the Trade Related Intellectual Property Agreement (TRIPS) and Public Health, a standard which the 2002 U.S. Trade Promotion Authority bill formally identified as a policy goal.

    Labor and environmental standards. The TPP FTA should build on the advancements made to the Bush FTAs' labor and environmental terms in 2007 which were included in the FTA with prospective TPP partner PelU.

    In addition, TPP labor standards must require signatories to enforce the core International Labor Organisation's (lLO) standards as set forth in the ILO Conventions.

    Procurement rules. We do not believe it is appropriate for intemational trade agreements to impose limits on the ability of Congress and state legislatures to design stimulus, infrastructure and other government procurement activities that promote the public interest. The old FTA model subjects many common U.S. federal and state procurement policies to challenges in trade tribunals. Included among these policies are: a ban on anti-offshoring, many Buy America policies, and U.S. renewable-energy, recycled content, and other environmental safety requirements.

    Services deregulation. It is our understanding that the Bush Administration's initial attraction to the TPP forum was based on these talks' focus on service sector liberalization and deregulation and establishment of new foreign investor rights, including in financial services. Given the worldwide effort to reregulate banking, securities, derivatives and other financial services, including the recent legislation passed in the House of Representatives, no trade agreement with the United States should contain any constraints on the ability of Congress to regulate either foreign financial service firms operating here or the cross-border provisions of financial services.

    Democracy clause. We believe that FTAs should be entered into only with trading partners that have democratic governments, and, should democratic governance be interrupted, the terms of an FTA be suspended until democratic rule is reestablished. …

    Food safety and agricultural terms. In addition, it will be critical to improve the safety and inspection standards for imported food and products in the pact relative to the past U.S. FTA model. We must also use the TPP opportunity to update FTA agriculture terms that have simultaneously undermined U.S. producers' ability to earn a fair price for their crops at home and in the global marketplace, while also displacing peasant farmers in trade partner nations.

    Let me just list what jumped out at me as the most significant proposed changes to existing trade rules:

    — no more investor-state

    — scaled back substantive investor protections

    — expanded labor rights enforcement

    — ensuring that Buy America is not restricted further

    — suspension of the agreement if democracy is being undermined

    This last one is particularly interesting given my recent post discussing the difference between FTAs and unilateral trade preferences.  It seems that perhaps some elements of EU trade agreements, as pointed to by Lorand Bartels, could now be incorporated into U.S. agreements.

    So, getting back to the initial part of this post, here's my question:  Which, if any, of these proposed new rules will be part of the "high standards" sought by the Obama Administration?

  • Did We Only Include Australia In The MAVINS Because We Needed An “A”?

     

    Joe Weisenthal, Deputy Editor, The Business Insider

    Your Questions

    • Why is Australia the “A” in MAVINS? Is that really a country on the verge of a breakout? Aren’t they developed already?
      • 2020 potential GDP in today’s dollars: $1.5 trillion (10% of an America)
      • 2050 potential GDP in today’s dollars: $5.8 trillion (40% of an America)
    • Which of the MAVINS will be the best place to put money on a going forward basis?
      • Mexico
        • Invest in the iShares MSCI Mexico Investable Market Index ETF (Ticker: EWW)
        • Buy Mexican American ADRs on the NYSE
      • Australia
        • Invest in the iShares MSCI Australia Index Fund (Ticker: EWA)
        • Direct investment into commodity producers
      • Vietnam
        • Invest in the Market Vectors Vietnam ETF (Ticker: VNM)
        • Buy stocks or private equity funds
      • Indonesia
        • Invest in the Market Vectors Indonesia ETF (Ticker: IDX)
        • Buy stocks of larger cap companies
      • Nigeria
        • Invest in the Market Vectors Africa Index ETF (Ticker: AFK)
        • Buy Nigerian GDRs
      • South Africa
        • Invest in the iShares South Africa ETF (Ticker: EZA)
        • Invest in natural resource companies via ADRs
    • Was the Kraft/Cadbury deal a bad one?
    • Why is TBI so enamored with one day market moves?

    Produced By: Kamelia Angelova & William Wei

    More Video: Click HERE >

    Join the conversation about this story »

    See Also:

  • Jim Bianco: Don’t Congratulate ‘Arsonist Bernanke’ For Putting Out His Own Fire

    (This post originally appeared at TechTicker)

    Keeping Ben Bernanke as Fed chairman is like rewarding “the arsonist [who] put out his own fire,” says Jim Bianco, president of Bianco Research.

    Bianco is harshly critical of Bernanke for his failures both as a regulator, which the Fed chairman has conceded, and for his easy money policies, which Bernanke denies were a major cause of the housing boom and subsequent bust.

    Many Fed watchers share this view yet Congress is likely to approve Bernanke’s reappointment, perhaps as early as this week. But critics of the Fed have been holding up the process and may resist voting on Bernanke’s reappointment until a bill to audit the Fed comes up for a vote first.

    Against that backdrop, Bernanke supported a “full review” of the Fed’s role in the AIG bailout earlier this week. The move was hardly magnanimous, Bianco says, suggesting the Fed chairman was trying appear conciliatory so Congress will vote on his reappointment before Jan. 31, when Bernanke’s current term as chairman expires.

    “What Bernanke is doing is holding out a partial carrot – he’s hoping that’ll be enough to get his nomination through the Senate,” Bianco says. “It’s completely political.”

    Whether the ploy works remains to be seen but Bianco supports the effort to audit the Fed, even as he’s sensitive to concerns it will restrain the central bank’s ability to conduct monetary policy without political influence.

    The audit the Fed movement is gaining moment “because of their secrecy [and] fear of their abuse of the Federal Reserve Act,” Bianco says, comparing the Fed’s opposition to a guy who speeds all the time, get tickets and then complains about losing his license.

    Join the conversation about this story »

    See Also:

  • The problem with Boards of Directors…

    On Tuesday night, I ventured out of my SEC filings hidey-hole to attend a party to mark the publication of “Money for Nothing” a new book by John Gillespie and David Zweig. The book focuses on a problem we’ve written about all too often here at footnoted: boards of directors who seem to take up time and space and provide little value to shareholders, even as they collect hefty salaries for what can charitably be called a part-time job.

    The two authors, both graduates of Harvard Business School, would be among the last you’d expect to take on the dysfunctional nature of boards of directors. Indeed, at the party, Zweig joked around that both he and Gillespie, a former investment banker at Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley and Bear Stearns, were considered traitors by many of their Harvard B-School classmates.

    Footnoted regulars will be familiar with some of the examples mentioned in the book, including Chesapeake Energy’s (CHK) infamous map collection, which won the dubious honor of worst footnote of the year, Washington Mutual’s many missteps, and even smaller questionable items, like the decision by Crox to sponsor a NASCAR race car that happened to be driven by the son of one of its directors. There’s also a healthy dose of Countrywide in there too.

    We’re still in the process of reading the book, so we can’t give a comprehensive review. And in the interest of full disclosure, we should note that the authors have nice things to say about footnoted. Over the weekend, the Times ran a more comprehensive review which ends with a funny story about a jailhouse interview that the authors had with former Tyco CEO Dennis Kozlowski this past summer and his relationship with Tyco’s board of directors when he was running the show.

    The book’s website also has a funny game called “Pay that CEO” and a video that’s also worth watching. Hopefully, the pedigree of the two authors will force more people to pay attention to the problems of the ineffective board.


  • One Tablet for All: Apple’s Slate as a Shared Media Device

    The Apple tablet, when (and if) released, will be a multimedia device. There’s little to no question about that. It’ll play video and music, allow you to browse photos and web content, and play games. But that simplistic definition of what it does doesn’t actually capture the significance of the tablet, according to a new report at the Wall Street Journal.

    In the report, the WSJ talks about how during development, the focus with the tablet was on what its role would be in homes and classrooms, rather than on how it could be used by individuals alone. Apple set out to create a device that would be perfectly suited to a shared use environment, which strikes me as a fairly novel way of designing personal electronics.

    Here’s how the device is tailored to household or group use:

    One person familiar with the matter said Apple has put significant resources into designing and programming the device so that it is intuitive to share. This person said Apple has experimented with the ability to leave virtual sticky notes on the device and for the gadget to automatically recognize individuals via a built-in camera. It’s unclear whether these features will be included at launch.

    Even with only that little information, I begin to see the marketing wisdom in such a design. Let’s face it, the tablet will be entering a market that is already fairly computer-rich, especially among the Apple faithful. If every member of a household has their own computer, how best to sell them another device that really has the same capabilities in a different form factor?

    The answer: Sell them one that everybody can use as easily as if it were an extension of their own computer, without the bulk, startup/shutdown hassle and other inconveniences associated with a proper desktop or laptop. The idea probably came naturally enough as an extension of what families were already doing with iPhones and iPod touches in the household belonging to one member. To then take that natural inclination and make it the actual focus of a new hardware platform is a stroke of marketing genius.

    If this is true and the development of the tablet really did focus along these lines, then think of what it might be able to do. You could pause a movie you were watching and go out for a run, then your wife could pick it up and instantly be taken to the email she was composing before you started using it, thanks to facial recognition tech. When you got back, if it was available, you could pick it up and the camera would see your face and resume the movie at the point where you left off, seamlessly.

    Apple is also looking at pitching the device to the education market, according to the WSJ report. It should be much more appealing to education users than the Kindle DX, which currently represents its main competition, since it will be able to support interactive applications and color display, which Amazon’s 9.7-inch reader cannot, though apps are reportedly in the works. Price will probably be the biggest factor. Both students and schools will be wary of something with a high per-unit price tag, unless Apple can make up the difference by offering significant discounts on the content side.

    Marketing the tablet as a household or shared device has the additional benefit of breaking up the cost in the mind of the consumer. A $1,000 price tag won’t look nearly as daunting if you start thinking about it as a shared community resource like a television. As a single guy living on my own, though, that consideration wouldn’t enter into my decision. Would it help you justify the cost?

    Related GigaOM Pro Research: Rumored Apple Tablet: Opportunities Too Big to Ignore

  • Chicago’s Michigan Avenue crackles with excitement throughout February during “Toast on the Magnificent Mile”

    Celebrate life’s moments every day of February with the luxury retail shops, hotels, dining and nightlife destinations that call The Magnificent Mile® in Chicago “home.”

    The 3rd annual TOAST on The Magnificent Mile offers overnight hotel packages from $139, “Shop, Sip and Save” retail events, special dining and nightlife offers featuring delicious Moet & Chandon champagne, and family-friendly fireworks every Saturday.

    The only winter fireworks show in Chicago provides a colorful crescendo highlighting The Magnificent Mile skyline near the Chicago River and Michigan Avenue on February Saturdays at 6:30 p.m. beginning Feb. 6.

    Each week, the first 750 guests arriving to the viewing area at 401 N. Michigan Avenue receive complimentary holographic viewing glasses.

    “Whether it’s a birthday, a new job, or simply a new look that guests want to celebrate, this entire month is about toasting everyday successes and joys in life,” said Angela Roman, the TOAST event chair who also serves as the wine director and director of operations for The Signature Room at the 95th by day.

    Roman went on to explain that her restaurant venue, located at 875 N. Michigan Avenue atop the John Hancock Center, will mark the month-long event by offering a Champagne Cooking Class for Couples on Feb. 15 that includes dinner and plenty of bubbly for participants.

    Events continue throughout the month on One of the Great Avenues of the World…North Michigan Avenue…and there’s even an enter-to-win opportunity to win a Magnificent Mile Weekend!

    Visit themagnificentmile.com for complete sweepstakes details.

    “The entire month is filled with ways to turn winter blahs into winter ahhhs,” said John Chikow, president and CEO of the Greater North Michigan Avenue Association, the business organization that presents TOAST on The Magnificent Mile along with Moët & Chandon.

    “Our member businesses offer spirited specials and events that give us all plenty of reason to celebrate throughout February,” the leader of the 700-member association added.

    Become a fan of The Magnificent Mile on Facebook and follow real-time event updates and special deals on Twitter at FeelMagnificent.

    For complete details for over 60 key events happening during TOAST on The Magnificent Mile, visit themagnificentmile.com, or call the special events hotline at (312) 409-5560.


  • The Toilet of Tomorrow [Concepts]

    You don’t know how to use this toilet? Wait, wait, you don’t know about the three seashells, either?? How could someone not understand the three seashells? Well, before you are further humiliated, let me explain.

    The Home Core Integrated Toilet, a concept by Dang Jingwei, fits a pedestal sink and a toilet into one, eco-friendly unit with a dangerous-looking swivel.

    When you wash your hands or brush your teeth in the sink, the system can retain this “gray water” for the toilet. Apparently, your butt excretions are not as picky as your mouth—who woulda thunk—so mixing some toothpaste with what is already wretched waste is no big deal. (Though, I’ll admit, it’s an image I’m not exactly keen on seeing.)

    As for the seashells, those are just there to hold hand jewelry. What were you doing with them? [Yanko Design via DVICE]






  • God of War III and Heavy Rain PS3 bundles coming to Europe

    Apart from being big PS3 exclusives, God of War III and Heavy Rain are getting two more things in common: both will be bundled with a 250GB PS3, and both are set for Europe.
     
     
     

  • Google Q4 Earnings Preview: Better Be Big To Drown Out The China Problem (GOOG)

    Google cofounders in 1998

    Google (GOOG) reports Q409 earnings after the close today.  The call will be at 4:30 PM EST.  We’ll be analyzing the earnings live here, starting at 4pm.

    The Bottom Line: Google’s stock has been hit in the past week on the company’s ultimatum to China (in which the company clumsily backed itself into a corner).  The core business, however, appears to be recovering strongly, and the market is  counting on strong results. 

    Specifically, the market expects the company to beat consensus estimates of $4.9 billion in revenue and $6.45 in EPS.

    Most investors are expecting sequential revenue growth in the 10%-11% range.  Anything below that will probably hammer the stock.  

    Background: At $575, the stock is priced at about 22X 2010 earnings, which is below historical levels of about 30-times, but still pretty rich for a company this huge. 

    Key Consensus Estimates:

    • Net Revenue $4.9 Billion
    • Non-GAAP EPS $6.45
    • Non-GAAP Operating Income $2.68 Billion  

    Here’s a quick outlook from JP Morgan’s Imran Khan:

     

    • *  We see net revenue of $5.11B. This implies Q/Q revenue growth of 16.6%. We see the US market growing 10% Q/Q.

    • *  We expect aggregate paid click growth of 12% Q/Q or 16% Y/Y. This is a slight acceleration from the 3Q growth rate of 14% Y/Y and roughly in line with 2Q’s 15% growth and 1Q’s 17% Y/Y growth.

    • *  We see EBITDA margins declining. We are modeling an EBITDA margin of 61.9%, down 130 bps sequentially but up 190 bps Y/Y. During the call, we will be looking for color on our expectations for an increased cost structure in 2010 due to acquisitions, increases in headcount, and product and infrastructure investments.

    • *  We are modeling a pro forma EPS of $6.85. This implies 34% Y/Y growth which is an acceleration from 20% growth in 3Q. We think this is reasonable given our expectations for 21% Y/Y net revenue growth and Y/Y costs increases of less than $300M. We are modeling CapEx of $400M, compared to $368M in 4Q’08 and $186M last quarter.

    • *  Commentary to watch for. We will be listening for insight into ad budget trends, CPC levels, strategic investment and infrastructure needs, an update on the China operations, and insight into the mobile device strategy.

    Here is a snapshot from Citi analyst Mark Mahaney:

    Google Earnings Cheat Sheet

    Join the conversation about this story »

    See Also:

  • Hacking Into Your Account is as Easy as 123456

    hacker-green.jpgThe big Hollywood pictures always make breaking into computers look like a fabulously hip and complicated process. It involves excitement and ingenuity and often times, because it’s just so difficult and exciting, a bit of sweat on the brow. But in reality, it’s as easy as “123456”. And if that doesn’t work, we’d suggest trying “12345”, next.

    A report released today looks at a list of 32 million passwords and what it finds doesn’t saying good things about most of us and our password practices.

    Sponsor

    The report, released by data security firm Imperva, works with real-world data to arrive at its finding. The 32 million passwords it uses as its data set were published on the Internet last month after being stolen from Rockyou.com.

    Like children who won’t eat their vegetables, we obviously aren’t doing what we’re told when it comes to the basics of password security. While 30% of users chose passwords under the recommended minimum of six characters, 50% use common names, slang, and easy-to-guess things like consecutive series of numbers. Take a look at the top 20 passwords from the list below.

    password-list.jpg

    The report goes on to give a list of recommendations that, as it points out from the beginning, you probably won’t follow. Two previous studies of password-use, one in 1990 and another 10 years later showed that “password selection is strikingly similar.”

    According to the data, a brute force attack would likely be able to access 1000 accounts in a mere 17 minutes.

    Photo credit: danielleblue.

    Discuss


  • BELFAST| (Northern Ireland) U.K

    A thread to show you a little city that I love in Northern Ireland

    Belfast City Hall

    Botanic garden

    Black taxi

    Police cars

    Malmaison, Hotel

  • 75 worst commutes: How does your city rank?

    Traffic 2.jpgEvery year, the average U.S. resident spends 100 hours commuting to and from work. As the Census Bureau notes, that’s more than the typical amount of vacation time we get each year (about 2 weeks).

    In certain areas, average commutes are much longer — made worse by congestion and delays that bring traffic to a standstill.

    The Daily Beast has a list of the 75 worst driving commutes in the country, based on travel time data. They also go a step further and identify the worst parts of these congested metro areas to find out where commutes get bogged down the most.

    The top of the list includes many the usual suspects: Hollywood Freeway in Los Angeles (#1), the Capitol Beltway around D.C. (#3), the Cross Bronx Expressway in New York (#6).

    It’s a testament to the South’s recent pattern of explosive urban growth that 27 of the 75, or 36%, of the metro areas on the list are in Southern states — a reality with important implications for energy and transportation policy.

    Here’s a list of the Southern cities with the worst commutes and their national rank:

    #4 – I-35 IN AUSTIN, TX
    Weekly hours of bottleneck congestion: 460
    A bit of a surprise that this would lead the South. “It’s the most traveled stretch of roadway of Austin and in the state,”
    says Joe Taylor, traffic reporter for News 8 Austin. “It’s quirky. It
    was designed for a small town, and we’ve grown into a very large city.”

    #10 – AIRPORT EXPRESSWAY IN MIAMI
    Weekly hours of bottleneck congestion: 183

    #12 – LOOP 610 AROUND HOUSTON
    Weekly hours of bottleneck congestion: 189

    #13 – BATON ROUGE
    Weekly hours of bottleneck congestion: 93

    #15 – LOOP 820 AROUND DALLAS-FORT WORTH
    Weekly hours of bottleneck congestion: 172

    Some other notables on the list:

    * #22 – I-75 IN ATLANTA
    A pretty low ranking for a city infamous for its traffic growing pains. But as one commenter wrote on the Atlanta Journal-Constitution website last November, “I wish they would make a ‘Grand Theft Auto: Atlanta’ so I could blow
    up the video game version of Interstate 75. It would be good therapy.”

    * #27 – I-10 NEW ORLEANS
    Despite post-Katrina depopulation, the major Interstate through the city still suffers from 93 weekly hours of congestion with bottlenecks up to 1.27 miles.

    * FLORIDA AND TEXAS
    Given their rapid growth, it’s no surprise that Florida and Texas both had five metro areas on the list. However, North Carolina and Georgia — which are in the same league in terms of population increases — only had three areas between them: Atlanta, Charlotte (#35) and Raleigh (#50). Is that because, in NC and GA, population increases have been more concentrated in a few cities, or that in general they’ve been better able to manage growth?

  • Untested Rape Kits: Endangering the Public

    What can we expect in Los Angeles, now that officials have announced that 27 new crime lab positions aimed at eliminating the city’s backlog of untested evidence kits from sexual assaults won’t be filled?

    Well, for one and most obviously, it means further delays in critical tests in unsolved cases. And though a compromise proposal before the city council would outsource the tests to deplete the backlog, even with such outsourcing, what with overall volume, the city’s crime lab will likely end up back where it started — unable to meet demands and watching a new backlog expand.

    It’s not just rape victims that should be incensed by the delay, but the broader public — on behalf of such victims, yes, but also because this lapse means that public safety as a whole remains at risk. Having untested rape kits means that sexual assaults are going unsolved, leaving perpetrators free to commit further crimes. What’s more, untested evidence can allow innocent suspects to remain in jail and increase the chance of wrongful conviction.

    (more…)

  • David Rosenberg: The Market Is Becoming Discriminating, A Rising Tide Will Not Lift All Boats

    rosenberg

    The big decline yesterday (and today) are clear signs that the market is no longer in a “rising tide lift all boats” mood, says David Rosenberg. The market will actually need to see good news in order to rally.:

    Once again, the fact the stock market finished the day lower – including below
    Friday’s close – despite the GOP Senate victory in the Massachusetts election,
    and that the decline would be on higher volume (+1.9% on the NYSE), attests to
    the view that equities have a whole lot of good news already priced in; probably
    too much.  This is a stark contrast to a year ago when it only took “less negative”
    sequential data and earnings performances to take the market higher.  Those
    days are gone.  
    Mr. Market has sent out an early message this year that he is going to be far
    more discriminating – this will not be another year when the rising tide lifts all
    the boats.  The shorts have long been covered, the hedge funds have reached
    their high-water marks, mutual fund manager cash ratios are back at the lows,
    and the VIX index is half the level it was a year ago in a show of how the market
    has shifted from being completely catatonic to completely complacent.  
    While there have been some upside surprises in the likes of Intel and Starbucks,
    as we saw yesterday in Morgan Stanley’s results, it remains a tough slog for the
    financials, which have generated very disappointing results when it comes to
    top-line performance – evidence that a new credit cycle is somewhere off in the
    distance but certainly not a present-day reality.  The Fed has a tough choice
    ahead and it’s not about raising rates – it’s about whether it will have to end up
    expanding its Quantitative Easing program and to do so, would be a gross
    acknowledgment to the prevailing bullish consensus that organic economic
    growth is just around the corner (if not here already based on the plethora of
    economic commentaries that come across our desk). 
    As for the bond market, we continue to see an overwhelming consensus that
    interest rates must move higher because of large-scale fiscal deficits. Yet, here
    we are, and the 10-year note has made numerous attempts to take out the 4%
    threshold in the past year and each attempt failed – despite a surging stock
    market, surging credit market, surging commodities and green shoots galore.  
    This may sound a touch heretical, but the reality is that there is a very loose
    connection between fiscal deficits and the direction of bond yields.  In 1999, the
    U.S. government ran an unprecedented budgetary surplus of $155 billion.  What
    did the yield on the 10-year note yield do that year?  It surged from 4.65% to
    6.45%.  Why?  Because the economy was humming, unemployment was
    dwindling, capacity was being used up at a rapid rate, private sector credit
    demands were surging, consumer confidence was high and rising, and inflation
    pressures were brewing.  
    Fast forward to 2002, and all of a sudden we have the fiscal situation swinging
    to a deficit of $230 billion.  What did the bond market have the absolute
    temerity to do that year?  It posted a huge drop in 10-year yields to 3.8% from
    5.1%.  So the yield at the end of the 2002 was actually 265bps lower than it was
    at the beginning of 2000 despite a massive $385 billion swing in the fiscal
    backdrop from surplus to deficit.  

    Join the conversation about this story »

    See Also:

  • “American Idol” Reject Donald Jarrod Norrell Hauled Away In Handcuffs

    Donald “Jarrod” Norrell, an American Idol reject whose rendition of “Amazing Grace” drew comparisions to the crank of a roaring lawnmower, was taken away from the Rosen Shingle Creek Resort in Orlando in handcuffs after Simon, Randy, and Kara refused to grant him a Golden Ticket to Hollywood.

    The 28-year-old from Marietta, Georgia refused to leave the stage when they told him he would not be advancing to the next round after his lackluster August 29 audition in the Sunshine State — which premiered on FOX Wednesday night. Norrell resisted an Orange County Sheriff’s Deputy and security guard and was “taken to the ground by security personnel after he tightened his legs and attempted to elbow one of the security officers,” according to the police report obtained by FOX 35 News this week.

    The aspiring singing star was cited with a citation for trespassing.


  • Selloff Intensifies, Dow Down Triple Digits For A Second Day

    suicide shoes bridge

    Whoosh, this is getting ugly. The Dow is down 150 points, marking the second straight down triple digits day and the fourth straight triple digits move.

    Join the conversation about this story »

    See Also:

  • Goldman Slashes Bonuses as Obama Plan Looms

    Goldman Sachs has throttled back its bonus pool in the face of political pressure, setting aside a record low of 36 percent of company revenues for compensation. Employees will receive an average of $498,000 for 2009, well above the $317,000 they received in 2008 during the depths of the financial crisis, but the total compensation pool of $16.2 billion is well below the record $20.2 billion from 2007.

    The move is the latest in a series of steps that Goldman has taken to improve its public image, from a $500 million fund for small businesses to restricting its top 30 executives to stock-based bonuses with a five-year lockup. Such moves — while understandable in a year when your company has been likened to a vampire squid — won’t slake public anger
    at the bank’s outsize  profits, which totaled $4.95 billion in the fourth quarter. A protest is scheduled for the company’s headquarters on Thursday, smaller bonus pool notwithstanding.

    “Goldman Sachs is not a
    banking or financial story now, it’s a political story,”
    portfolio manager Matt McCormick told Reuters.

    That’s especially true as President Obama prepares to announce a Wall Street crackdown,
    especially on Goldman’s specialty, proprietary trading — that is,
    trading for your own accounts rather than your clients’. Goldman will
    almost certainly be forced to make changes due to Obama’s proposal,
    either by ramping down the risks it takes, firewalling its own trading
    activities from those of its clients, or shedding its newly acquired commercial bank status.

    Goldman
    watchers will have to wait a bit longer to see how the bank adjusts —
    and also to find out how much CEO Lloyd Blankfein will get. He got a
    record $68 million in total compensation in 2007, and took no bonus in
    2008. His 2009 bonus will come all in stock, but it will still be an
    eye-popping number.




    Email this Article
    Add to digg
    Add to Reddit
    Add to Twitter
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to StumbleUpon
    Add to Facebook



  • Support group

    Hi ‘ya all. Im starting a pump group. This next meeting is a Cardio dr coming to talk about how the sugar/and lipids effect us D’s. I’m trying to make the group interactive and not being "talked at". Can any one think of a quiz or project we can do to demo. the damage it does to our blood and cardio system?
    thanks for helping me to 🙂 help others
  • Yasuní, un sitio importante para la naturaleza

    El proyecto ‘Yasuní ITT’ impulsado por el Gobierno ecuatoriano ha levantado gran controversia en la opinión pública durante los últimos días, sin embargo, como meollo de esta iniciativa está un Parque Nacional, el cual “está en el centro de una pequeña zona.

    Allí, los anfibios, los pájaros, los mamíferos y las plantas vasculares alcanzan una diversidad máxima en Sudamérica,” según las expresiones de Clinton Jenkins, de la Universidad de Maryland, proporcionadas por la organización Finding Species.

    Esta institución ha liderado desde 2004 un trabajo de investigación del Parque, con expertos de Ecuador y Estados Unidos, por lo que exaltan la amplia riqueza con la que se han encontrado en dicho lugar de la Amazonia.

    Inmensa biodiversidad
    Uno de los elementos que más ha llamado la atención a los científicos es la gran cantidad de anfibios documentados en el sitio.
    Son 150 especies de este tipo de animales, por lo que Diego Cisneros, experto de la Universidad San Francisco de Quito, considera que “es un record mundial para un área de este tamaño”.

    Otro dato relevante es que en una hectárea del bosque de este lugar se estima que hay 100 mil especies de insectos, lo cual es la diversidad más alta estimada por área de unidad en el mundo, según Ferry Erwin, entomólogo.

    En el comunicado, Margot Bass, presidenta de Finding Species, recalcó que “uno de nuestros resultados más importantes que encontramos sobre Yasuní es que pequeñas áreas del bosque abrigan cantidades extremadamente altas de especies de animales y de plantas”.

    En cuanto a la vegetación, este rincón amazónico aumenta el número de ejemplares por encima de los 1.100 en 25 hectáreas, por lo que se considera que tiene más variedad que Estados Unidos y Canadá.

    Su valor
    En este Parque Nacional existen, según Finding Species, cientos de especies que no hay en otros lugares del planeta, y cita como ejemplo a 20 tipos de anfibios, 19 de aves y cuatro de mamíferos. Pero a pesar de su extraordinario valor, también cuenta con 28 vertebrados en peligro de extinción, según la Lista Roja de Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza.

    Matt Finer de la organización Save America’s Forests, expresa que “lo que hace a Yasuní especialmente significativo es su potencial para sostener esta extraordinaria biodiversidad a largo plazo”. Y agrega que “por ejemplo, se predice que mantendrá sus condiciones de bosques húmedos, a pesar de que el clima cambie y se intensifique la sequía en el este de la Amazonia en Brasil.”

    Una parte de su riqueza
    Finding Species destaca que “la extraordinaria diversidad de Yasuní se ejemplifica mejor en los 6,5 km2 de la Estación de Biodiversidad Tiputini, situada en el borde norteño del parque”. Este sitio acoge a 247 especies de anfibios y reptiles, 550 de aves, y alrededor de 200 de mamíferos.

    “Además, la estación es el sitio más rico del planeta en especies de murciélagos (más de 100)”, agregó Thomas Kunz, investigador de la Universidad de Boston.

    Conozca
    Fauna infinita

    • 121 especies de reptiles.
    • 596 especies de pájaros.
    • 382 especies de peces.
    • 204 especies de mamíferos.

    FRASE“Yasuní probablemente es incomparable con ningún otro parque en el mundo por la cantidad total de especies.” Margot Bass, presidenta de Finding Species.

    Fuente Bibliográfica