Blog

  • Review: Palm Pre Plus on Verizon

     

    Palm has updated the Pre for Verizon, slightly tweaking the hardware and upping the RAM available to run apps. The Pre Plus is exclusive to Verizon and in addition to the noted hardware updates, the Pre Plus also will have an innovative and crazy-cool piece of software available for it called "Mobile Hotspot," which turns the Pre Plus into a mobile WiFi router. The Palm Pre Plus arrives January 25th on Verizon, exclusively, for $149.99 after a $100 mail-in rebate and a two-year contract.

    We’ve had the Palm Pre Plus for a few days now and our initial take is quite simple: it’s definitely better than the original Pre, but is it so much better that current Sprint subscribers should switch to Verizon? Read on to find out!

    read more

  • Palm Pre Plus Review [Palm Pre Plus]

    Sprint customers: If you’re worried that you bought a first gen Palm Pre only to watch helplessly as Palm released a better Pre on Verizon, stop. The Palm Pre Plus is essentially the same phone as the Palm Pre.

    Sure, there are minor hardware differences—most notably the doubling of the RAM and the storage space—but it essentially feels like the same phone.

    What’s changed in the hardware

    The three most visible changes you’ll notice are the removed front button, the matted inductive-charging-capable backplate and the slightly improved keyboard.

    Palm realized with the Palm Pixi that a front button was unnecessary, since it broke up the smooth finish of the face, and replaced it with a touch-sensitive button instead. It’s what the Pre should have been like in the first place. The new touch button works fine, and within a few minutes you’ll barely even miss the hardware key like you would never miss a sixth toe you never had.

    The keyboard has been upgraded as well, made much less mushy with more tactile feedback when you hit a key—another lesson Palm learned from the Pixi. You’ll type faster and more accurately with these keys compared to the original Pre, even though they don’t raise up any higher off the body and their layout remains unchanged.

    The Touchstone-compatible inductive backing comes standard on the Pre Plus. Palm effectively lowered the cost of their inductive charger by $20—it’s $70 on Sprint, which comes with the back, and $50 on Verizon, which doesn’t—and makes the accessory all the easier to justify buying. Even if you don’t go the wireless charging route, the matted, inductive finish makes the phone a lot classier and less prone to fingerprint smudging.

    Everything else is the same

    That same cheese-cutting bottom edge of the phone is still there, and the overall mold of the device is exactly what we saw with the first Pre. There’s no change in camera, processor, graphical capability or screen. And, luckily for Pre owners, the software is identical, too.

    Basically, if you didn’t like the original Pre, you won’t like the Pre Plus any more than before. But if you did like the Pre and didn’t want to jump to Sprint, Palm’s graciously brought it to you.

    How does it compare to the original in performance?

    Both phones took almost exactly two minutes to boot up, side by side. Flicking around, browsing websites, listening to music and answering emails—in any of these routine tasks, you’d never tell the two phones apart through blind testing. However, there is a slight difference when you start getting to heavy multitasking.

    The increased RAM starts to be utilized when you open a LOT of apps—I’m talking about ten or more, something you normally wouldn’t do unless you were really bored, really forgetful or really lazy about closing your apps. Once you have all these things open at once, you’ll notice that the old Pre takes somewhere between 5 to 10 seconds longer to start up new applications than the Pre Plus. While this improvement may be handy for some, the fact that the discrepancy is only 5 to 10 seconds is a testament to how well the multitasking memory allocation worked in the original Pre. Once all these apps are open, there isn’t much difference, but switching around is a bit faster.

    Mobile Hotspot

    While the Sprint Pre lacks tethering, Verizon’s Palm Plus includes an excellent Mobile Hotspot app that’s quite simple to use. It’s essentially the same as other tethering apps out there: Fire up the app, set a hotspot password and switch on the tethering. Any Wi-Fi device (laptops, phones) will see the broadcasted network and be able to connect to it as you would any other hotspot.

    And Verizon, although not the “fastest” 3G network, still gave pretty damn good speeds when I was testing this feature—and it’s reliable to boot. The only downside is the pricing, which we’ll cover later, but having a portable MiFi that’s also your phone can be a lifesaver if you need to connect from the field.

    So that’s why Palm called this Plus

    There isn’t enough to call this an entirely new series of Palm phones, or even a Palm Pre 2. The Pre Plus improved on the Pre in a few important regards, don’t get me wrong, but it’s essentially the same phone we’ve seen for the last six months. You won’t notice the increased memory unless you’re a habitual window-opener, nor will you appreciate the keyboard unless you really had a problem with the previous one.

    So yes, it’s called the Palm Pre Plus for a reason. And it lets Verizon customers get in on the web OS action while staying on their preferred network—which is a good thing, and actually a decent move for Palm. Rather than try to suck more money off the same group of potential customers (Sprint users) with a phone that will be a bit better but not all that different, Palm went ahead and repackaged the same phone with slight modifications to a new sea of potential users.

    I suspect that this strategy will grant Palm more return on their initial webOS/Palm Pre investment, justifying the production of an entirely new phone that catches up to both the Nexus One and the upcoming iPhone 4. For Palm’s sake, it better.

    Pricing

    The Palm Pre Plus will be $150 with a two-year contract on Verizon, and the Pixi Plus will be $100. That’s the same price as it is currently on Sprint—even though Sprint had some deals earlier to push their Pre down to the $100 range.

    But, Verizon has a special deal where you can buy either a Pre Plus or a Pixi Plus and get one free Pixi Plus after mail-in rebate, if you want to switch your family over to all Palms.

    Here’s the bad. The 3G hotspot feature will be an extra $40 on top of your existing voice and data plans, and it won’t be unlimited! Verizon will give you 5GB and charge 5 cents per MB that you go over. It’s pricey, but nice to have in an emergency.

    And here are the voice plans that go with. You’ll be able to buy the Pre Plus and Pixi Plus—which we didn’t review, because it’s the same exact hardware with Mobile Hotspot added—January 25.

    More RAM and storage means a slightly better experience, but you might not notice it


    Keyboard is improved


    Hotspot tethering app is somewhat unique, since it’s officially sponsored by the provider


    Still a fan of webOS as a smartphone platform, and it’s still in good shape here


    Still not as many apps as Android or iPhone yet


    It’s basically the same phone as the Palm Pre


    Hotspot access is expensive

    Background can be found here






  • ARTICLE: Palm Pre Plus and Pixi Plus pricing and data plans announced

    In anticipation of Monday’s Palm Pre Plus and Pixi Plus launch on Verizon Wireless, phone and plan pricing has been disclosed.

    The Palm Pre Plus will be $149.99 after a $100 mail-in rebate, while the Palm Pixi Plus will cost $99.99 after a $100 mail-in rebate.  Both will require a new two-year customer agreement.  What’s more, in a positive sign for Palm’s sales numbers, Verizon will be offering a BOGO promotion.  From January 25th to February 14th, purchase a Palm Pre Plus or Pixi Plus, and get a Pixi Plus for free after mail-in rebate.

    To recap, the Palm Pre Plus is different from the original Pre in that it offers a revamped navigational pad, 16 GB of storage, double the RAM, Mobile Hotspot capability, an updated keyboard that works similarly to the Pixi’s, and an inductive battery cover out of the box for Touchstone support.  The Palm Pixi Plus offers Wi-Fi out of the box.

    As expected, the data plan for the two devices will be an additional $29.99 monthly.  The shocker comes in the Mobile Hotspot pricing – a whopping $40 per month in addition to your data plan.  So if you opt for unlimited calling, text messaging, data, and Mobile Hotspot, you’re looking at $160 monthly.  I can understand $20, but $40 for Mobile Hotspot?  Talk about expensive.  I don’t know about you, but I couldn’t stomach $70 for data, despite the capabilities of the Mobile Hotspot.

    Will you be eagerly waiting at your local Verizon store when Monday morning rolls around?  How about that Mobile Hotspot feature – are you willing to spend $40 for it, or are you going to stick with the $29.99 unlimited data and call it a day?  Sound off in the comments section below!


  • ARTICLE: First Impressions: Palm webOS hits Verizon with Pre and Pixi Plus

    Verizon got all official with their first two webOS devices today, announcing pricing for the Pixi Plus and Pre Plus and sending out early review units. Aaron’s got more details and analysis on the voice and data plans, including the new “Mobile 3G Hotspot” data plan add-on (which is too expensive at $40/month, if you ask me), but here’s the device pricing:

    • Pre Plus: $149.99 after rebate with two-year contract
    • Pixi Plus: $99.99 after rebate with two-year contract
    • Through Feb. 14, buy either a Pre Plus or Pixi Plus and get another Pixi Plus free after rebate
    • Both phones available Jan. 25
    As for the phones themselves, as we showed you a few weeks ago at CES, they’re basically updated versions of the Pre and Pixi that hit Sprint last year.  The major changes:
    • Pre Plus gets 16GB internal storage (double the 8GB on Pre), a Touchstone induction-compatible back cover, and a much improved, Pixi-esque keyboard
    • Pixi Plus gets WiFi
    • Both devices support the new Mobile 3G Hotspot app
    I got hands-on time with both phones at CES, and also have been mashing my thumbs on a Pixi Plus for the past several hours. Due to a shipping mix-up, I received two Pixi Pluses instead of a Pixi Plus and a Pre Plus. A swap is already underway and I’ll have a Pre Plus in the house bright and early tomorrow and will tell you all about it.

    In a word, both devices bring solid upgrades over the original versions, but neither is an entirely new webOS phone. That new Mobile 3G Hotspot is well implemented, if surprisingly pricey – device data plus hotspot data comes out to $70 per month on top of whatever voice plan you opt for. Unlimited everything including mobile hotspot? $160/mo. Ouch.  Still, the service is easy to use and allows up to five devices to join the network simultaneously. I tried it out on Pixi Plus and the user interface is about as easy to use as could be imagined, allowing creation of an open or password-protected network on the fly.
    Despite rumors that Pre Plus would rock a newer, faster processor than its predecessor, the phone has the same TI OMAP 3430 chip as you’ll find in the Pre. Palm and Verizon were smart to refresh the flagship webOS device with additional storage and a much, much (much!) better hard QWERTY board – both refinements make Pre Plus newsworthy as a piece of hardware, even if it’s not a brand-new Palm phone. The inclusion of an induction-compatible battery cover as standard Pre Plus equipment is smart, as well, as it makes the price of entry to Touchstone wireless charging much lower. Palm re-asserted the fact that Touchstone is a brand and the wireless charging base is but the first product in that brand when we met with them at CES. Hopefully that means more Touchstone goodies in 2010, especially since all Pre Pluses will be ready for said accessories right out of the box.
    Similarly, Pixi Plus gets a much-desired if “only evolutionary” upgrade with the inclusion of WiFi. I know it’s Pre’s little sister, but I love Pixi, and I’m sure I’ll love Pixi Plus even more now that I can get my 802.11 b/g on with it. Though Pixi’s screen is noticeably smaller and lower-resolution than Pre’s, it’s plenty sharp and bright, and because webOS was built to be scalable to different resolutions, apps, notifications, and gestures work just fine on the more diminutive of the two new devices. Plus, Pixi Plus feels great in the hand and I, for one, prefer a candybar form factor to Pre’s slider.
    Though once I get Pre Plus to myself tomorrow, I may change my tune. My biggest hang up with the original Pre was its keyboard. Now that Pre Plus comes with a Pixi-style QWERTY that’s much more to my liking, I could wind up singing a different tune altogether about Palm’s flagship phone.

     


  • Palm Pixi Plus Review & Image Gallery

    It’s been just over two months since the original Palm Pixi landed on Sprint and already we have the Palm Pixi Plus hitting Verizon: January 25th, $99 after a $100 mail-in rebate and a two-year contract. We’ve already thoroughly reviewed the original Palm Pixi and so strongly recommend you check that out – what we’re ‘reviewing’ here are the differences.

    Read on for those and for a gallery of hot hot Palm Pixi Plus action!

    read more

  • Palm Pre Plus Image Gallery

    The Palm Pre Plus on Verizon is little, black, better. Click on through to see why!

    read more

  • Everything About the Palm Pre Plus and Palm Pixi Plus in 10 Minutes

    New to webOS? Verizon customer looking to replace that janky BlackBerry and wondering what all the fuss is about? You’re in the right place – the video above has everything you need to know about webOS in ten minutes.

    Looking for more information? Our original Palm Pre Review has a bootload of information – just be aware that Palm has added a ton of new features since we wrote it. If you’re intrigued by any of the concepts mentioned in the video above, you can find out more details in our Palm Pre Guide.

    Of course, the real knowledge lives in the biggest Palm forums on the internet, so don’t hesitate to try a search there!

  • Palm Pre Plus vs Palm Pre – Multitasking Mayhem

    Above, we compare the multitasking prowess of the new Palm Pre Plus on Verizon to the original Palm Pre on Sprint. How much of a difference does that extra RAM make? Preliminary results are in and the difference is: a lot.

    We can’t tell if maybe Palm sent us a ringer for a review unit, but you can see above that, no fooling, it’s 13 cards on the original Pre vs 50 on the Pre Plus.

    Yes, the Pre Plus did slow down quite a bit when we started getting over 30(!) cards, but it kept on opening apps like a champ and never brought us the "Too Many Cards" error.

    What do you think?

  • Palm Pre Plus vs iPhone 3GS: Need for (Browser) Speed

    We didn’t go all-out in this Palm Pre Plus vs. iPhone 3GS smackdown, instead we picked the three things that best show the differences between the platforms, to wit:

    • Browser load and rendering time
    • Loading up and playing a 3D game
    • Multitasking

    The results came in pretty much exactly how you’d guess: the iPhone 3GS edges out the Palm Pre Plus on both the Browser speed test and loading up Need For Speed Undercover. The iPhone also, incidentally, blows the doors off webOS when it comes to the number and quality of available games.

    But the Palm Pre Plus did some door-blowing of its own – you’re able to pause the game and pick up right where you left off because of the card multitasking system.

  • Palm Pre Plus and Palm Pixi Plus Verizon Pricing (with BOGO!)

    We now know the cost of the Palm Pre Plus and the Palm Pixi Plus on Verizon – available everywhere on January 25th:

    • Palm Pre Plus: $149.99 after $100 mail-in rebate and 2 year contract
    • Palm Pixi Plus:: $99 after $100 mail-in rebate and 2 year contract.

    In addition to Verizon’s new calling and data plans, we also know the cost of the Mobile Hotspot service: $40 per month for 5 gigs with a 5c per meg overage fee. This compares well to Verizon’s standalone mobile broadband plan, which clocks in at $59.99 for the same amount of data.

    We’d like to gripe about the mail-in rebate, but them’s the breaks in our subsidized day and age. Be sure to check out our full review of the Palm Pre Plus and our full review of the Palm Pixi Plus – to us it looks like there’s more than enough differentiation between the two phones to justify the price difference.

    But wait, as they say, there’s more! Verizon also confirmed to us that there will be a "Buy One, Get One" offer: Buy a Palm Pre Plus or Palm Pixi Plus, get a Palm Pixi Plus for free after mail-in rebate. The offer is good through February 14th. In other words, the earlier rumor was exactly correct.

    What do you think?

  • Some Lessons from the AT&T/Facebook Switcheroo

    Over the weekend, there was an odd story about people using AT&T’s wireless network trying to log in to Facebook, and suddenly finding themselves logged in to somebody else’s Facebook account. What could have caused such a strange phenomenon to occur? What does it tell us about the innards of the mobile web, and what lessons might it convey for network and application design?

    Ars Technica had a good post documenting some of the possibilities, and AT&T has now made some public statements containing a few key clues about the problem. We have a few things to add.

    [Warning – this post gets fairly technical]

    1. Facebook. Facebook needs to start using HTTPS for everything! Without HTTPS and secure cookies, the private and sensitive information in their users’ accounts is vulnerable to being mixed up by ISPs’ proxy servers, logged, eavesdropped or pilfered by hackers.1 Google now uses HTTPS by default for every interaction with Gmail, and there’s no excuse for Facebook not to do the same.

    2. AT&T. Here, the story is more complicated, but the short summary is that AT&T (and all other ISPs) really need to migrate away from using proxy and gateway servers to perform complicated software tasks.

    The problem at the ISP’s end appears to have been a manifestation of an engineering hangover from WAP 1.0, which was the first attempt to bring the Web to mobile phones. WAP made a number of design decisions intended to work around the limitations of 1990s-era cell phones, including tiny storage space, limited bandwidth, and small keypads. In retrospect, some of those design decisions appear to have been unwise. A relevant example was the decision to involve the wireless carrier in website authentication. Where the normal HTTP Web stores authentication cookies on users’ computers, early versions of WAP specified that cookies should be stored on proxy servers called WAP gateways, operated by wireless carriers.2 Another practice was to try to avoid ever having to make the user type a username and password with only a numeric keypad, by circulating URLs that contained automatic authentication parameters.

    It was this WAP tradition of getting ISPs intimately involved in authentication that led to a situation today where a malfunction on AT&T’s proxies could let one user log in to another’s Facebook account. This situation is bad for the privacy and security of mobile web users, and it carries some important lessons about the division of responsibility between ISPs and web and application providers.

    Wherever possible, ISPs should try to avoid solving complicated problems — like web authentication — by using proxy and gateway servers on their network. Inevitably, having an extra machine in the loop raises the complexity of the solution and increases the number of possible points of failure. If this had been a problem with a website smaller than Facebook, the chances are that it would have remained undiagnosed and unfixed for much longer.

    There is a lot of engineering controversy about whether it’s ever appropriate for complex application functions to be performed by proxies, gateways or transcoders operated by ISPs. One key argument is that if the ISPs pick a poor solution, or don’t all implement exactly the same thing, then developers and users will be worse off than if the ISP had done nothing at all.

    Whether or not this is true in all cases, it’s clear, at the very least, that ISPs need to be extremely cautious in this space. They need to only deploy a proxy-type solution when it is certain that clients and servers can’t solve the problem for themselves. They need to be transparent: follow well-established standards, clearly document their practices, and answer technical questions promptly. Lastly, they should offer users and application providers a standardised way to opt-out of the proxies if they might cause technical or security problems.

    Even as mobile phones and mobile browsers are approaching the sophistication of desktop PCs, many mobile carriers are continuing to play strange and undocumented tricks with subscribers’ data communications.

    And AT&T in particular still has a way to go with respect to transparency. Their public statements indicated that they had deployed some new security measures in the wake of the Facebook affair. When we asked them what those measures were, their spokesperson’s response was:

    In terms of the new security measures AT&T has put into place, due to security sensitivity, we aren’t providing specifics.

    AT&T’s disappointing response is to retreat to security through obscurity. But long experience teaches that security through obscurity is usually no security at all.

    1. 1. Unlike the main Facebook site, some mobile versions of Facebook do now use HTTPS for parts of the login process. But until they wrap their entire sessions in encryption and set the “secure” flag for authentication cookies, it will remain possible to eavesdrop on Facebook communications, and to perform numerous cookie hijacking and javascript injection attacks to hack into an account.
    2. 2. In practice, this made cookie authentication unusable in WAP, because the way that WAP gateways were implemented and configured was insufficiently standardized, and because many developers realised that it was unacceptable to trust carriers’ gateway servers with so much of their authentication housekeeping. This meant that websites had to fall back to a practice known as “URL rewriting” or “URL decoration”, which meant adding an authentication token to every URL. In practice, this is frequently equivalent to putting the user’s password in the URL.
  • ECONOMICS IN SWEDEN. HELP!

    Im a 16 year old guy from venezuela and im representing YOUR COUNTRY (sweden) in an international school model united nations. Im in the ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL COUNCIL.

    the topic A refers to: THE ABUSE OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC MONOPOLIES.
    and…
    the topic B refers to: THE EFFICIENCY OF REGIONAL ECONOMIC ENTITIES(companies)

    if any of you could tell me about the economy of sweden related to this topics it would be a really good help. I want to represent your country in the best way!

    cheers!

  • Brentwood Home Page: Big map exposes big world to students

    BrentwoodThis article in Brentwood Home Page features the Tennessee Geographic Alliance, based in the UT Knoxville Department of Geography.

  • Evacuees from Haiti to arrive at O’Hare tonight

    A special United Airlines flight is en route to Chicago this afternoon from Haiti with about 75 evacuees, an airline spokeswoman said. Earlier in the day, the airline dropped off several dozen relief workers and supplies.

    The flight is scheduled to land at O’Hare International Airport shortly after 9 p.m., having made a brief refueling stop in Puerto Rico.

    The airline planned to transport 15,000 pounds of water donated by Walgreens, nearly 400 tents from Feed the Children and communications equipment from Airline Ambassadors.

    The Illinois Department of Children and Family Services said it is preparing to care for children who might be arriving. The children will not officially be placed in state custody, spokesman Kendall Marlowe said.

    Marlowe said medical officials would screen Haitians while they are processed for entry into the U.S.

    Marlowe would not comment about where the children would be housed upon their arrival in Chicago to protect their privacy. He said some of the children might already be in the pipeline for adoption.

    United plans up to 30 more relief flights to Haiti.

    Several charter flights have arrived in the U.S. in the last 24 hours to bring in children along with adults who need medical care.

    Oscar Avila

    Read the original article from Tribune News Services.


  • No national pride left?

    I still find this hard to believe, but basically it appears that it is UK taxpayers’ money which is funding Kraft for its take-over of Cadbury. So in other words the UK government is funding foreign predator firms whilst domestic business is starved for credit.

    I find this so scandalous I believe it merits its own thread.

    The article:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8470776.stm
    Clegg attacks Brown over RBS funding for Cadbury bid

    Gordon Brown said the government was helping to minimise unemployment
    Gordon Brown has been criticised after it was revealed the taxpayer-owned Royal Bank of Scotland is funding the takeover of Cadbury by a US company.

    So whilst many countries are setting up state funds and use many of the currently state-owned banks to protect and promote their own companies, the UK seems to be doing the opposite. Just compare the approach with France and its recently established Fonds Strategique d’Investissment. http://www.swfinstitute.org/fund/france.php

    Now, to add insult to injury, it is not even a good transaction for RBS. As RBS has demonstrated sufficiently by now, it is poor at dealing with risk. Well, since it wrote the loan, Kraft got downgraded very materially to just one notch above "junk debt" status. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/fit…bbb-2010-01-20

    I work in the City but can please someone come and explain to me why RBS is giving a loan to a foreign company with such crap credit rating when it is refusing to lend to UK companies with better ratings, thereby costing British jobs. And could someone please explain why the government is spinning a story that it is opposed to the take-over and will do everything to protect jobs, whilst they could just have told RBS not to make the loan as they were fully aware. Finally, could someone please explain to me that there is so little national pride left that something like this can actually happen.

  • Small fire in West Englewood displaces 3

    A small fire on the roof of a West Englewood apartment building this afternoon left three people displaced from their homes, fire officials said.

    No injuries were reported at the fire, which broke out about 4:45 p.m. at a three-story building in the 6500 block of South Ashland Avenue and was extinguished a few minutes later, said Chicago Fire Department spokesman Quention Curtis.

    Curtis said the city Department of Human Services was on the scene to help the displaced people, all of whom are adults, find temporary shelter.

    Staff report

    Read the original article from Tribune News Services.


  • FBI Replaced Legal Process with Post-It Notes to Obtain Phone Records

    Today, the DOJ’s Office of the Inspector General issued a long awaited report on the FBI’s use of ‘exigent letters’ to obtain phone records. While the report has many interesting and shocking revelations, three issues jumped out at us: Post-it note process; a secret new legal theory; and the need for accountability for the telecoms.

    Post-it notes. Seriously.

    While we had known since 2007 that the FBI improperly sought phone records by falsely asserting emergency circumstances, the report shows the situation inside the FBI’s Communications Analysis Unit (CAU) degenerated even further, sometimes replacing legal process with sticky notes.

    Employees of three telecoms worked directly out of the CAU office, right next to their FBI colleagues. According to the report, even exigent letters became too much work: an FBI analyst explained that “it’s not practical to give the [exigent letter] for every number that comes in.” Instead, the telecoms would provide phone records pursuant to verbal requests and even post-it notes with a phone number stuck on the carrier reps’ workstations.

    At the time, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act allowed a telecom to provide records based on an actual emergency, where the carrier had a “reasonable belief” that “an emergency involving danger of death or serious physical injury to any person requires disclosure without delay.” The bare assertion of exigent circumstances in the FBI’s letters is not enough to provide the basis for a reasonable belief, let alone a telephone number on a yellow slip of paper.

    In March 2006, the relevant ECPA provision was changed from “reasonable belief” to “good faith belief.” It appears that the telecoms were worried that the bare assertions in exigent letters were not enough, because they “expressed concern to [Congress] that the [reasonably believes] standard was too difficult for them to meet.” However, even after the change, there is no way the telecoms could have formed a good faith belief, when they were never provided any basis to do so.

    New Legal Theory to Allow Phone Record Disclosure

    The OIG report discusses, in heavily redacted form, discusses a new legal theory that the FBI now asserts allows telecoms to divulge phone records without legal process. Despite the Obama Administration’s alleged commitment to openness and transparency, the OIG report redacts the basis for this legal theory, even redacting the statutory section number on which the FBI says it can rely.

    According to the report, the DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel issued an opinion agreeing with this theory on January 8, 2010. The DOJ’s “Principles to Guide the Office of Legal Counsel” states that “OLC should publicly disclose its written legal opinions in a timely manner, absent strong reasons for delay or nondisclosure.” Nevertheless, the opinion is not publicly available. We urge the Obama Administration to release this memo.

    We Need Accountability for AT&T and Verizon

    The ECPA is one of the cornerstones of our protection against government overreaching, providing a critical check on the power of government officials. However, since government investigations are typically secret, it only works if the telecoms hold up their end of the bargain, and refuse to violate the law when asked. Instead, one embedded telecom employee opined “it wasn’t my place to police the police.” This is the opposite of what the law requires.

    So how can we have accountability? Rather then call out the telecoms who failed to fulfill their roles as a check on government power, the report is cagey about which telecoms were involved, cryptically referring to Companies A, B and C.

    However, it is not hard to figure out the telecoms’ identities. In sworn testimony to Congress, right after the initial March 2007 OIG report, FBI General Counsel Valerie Caproni testified that the three companies were AT&T, Verizon and MCI. Verizon later acquired MCI. Caproni confirmed that these were the only companies under contract to provide phone record information to the FBI.

    We also know that Company A was AT&T. In 2007, Verizon and AT&T wrote to Congress to explain their role in unlawful spying, including exigent letter. Verizon said it did not have ‘community of interest‘ information. The OIG report says that Companies B and C did not have ‘community of interest’ information, meaning that B and C were Verizon and its subsidiary MCI, and thus Company A is AT&T.

    We urge Congress to investigate both the FBI and telecoms, including asking the hard questions to AT&T and Verizon about their complicity in an illegal program to obtain phone records with post-it notes.

  • Another trade show may leave Chicago

    The International Home + Housewares Show, a Chicago mainstay since 1939, plans to assess whether it should move from McCormick Place to Las Vegas or Orlando for 2012, the Rosemont-based show sponsor disclosed Tuesday.

    McCormick Place, which lost two big shows last fall, is at risk of losing several more in coming months, sources said.

    One of them, sources said, is the National Restaurant Association, which has not yet made a commitment for its 2012 show. The restaurant show is among the city’s most well-known.

    The International Housewares Association’s board applauded the city and state’s push to cut trade show costs, but said the alternative site review is being done in case Chicago fails to make adequate progress in time for a 2012 decision. The March show is booked here for the next two years.

    “Our board members represent our exhibitors, who are critically concerned about the costs relating to labor, food and the operational aspects involved in exhibiting or attending our show at McCormick Place,” said Phil Brandl, association president.

    The show draws 60,000 attendees and generates an estimated $75 million in local spending.

    The association shopped around several years ago as well but stayed put after cost adjustments were made. Since then, costs have risen and “the economy certainly has put pressure on the whole picture,” Brandl said.

    [email protected]

    Read the original article from Tribune News Services.


  • 100-plus animals evacuated from Riverside County’s Banning animal shelter due to storm

    Animal shelter

    County animal services workers evacuated the Banning Animal Shelter today, removing more than 100 animals, including seven horses and three goats, because of anticipated flooding.

    Riverside County Department of Animal Services Director Robert Miller ordered the evacuation this afternoon. "The Banning Animal Shelter’s drainage capacity is not adequate to provide a safe or healthy environment in light of the onslaught of heavy rains expected," Miller said.

    Animals will be transferred to the county’s Coachella Valley Animal Campus, 72-050 Pet Land Place, Thousand Palms, said spokesman John Welsh.

    A few animals were sent to the Coachella campus Tuesday when some kennel runs were flooded by rains, Welsh said.

    "Everyone is reporting that these will be some of the most severe storms in quite some time," Miller said.

    "It’s our job to make sure we care for our stray and homeless pets the best we can. That’s why we needed to make this unusual decision."

    The Banning Shelter will be closed until further notice, Welsh said.

    Related:

    Complete coverage of Southland storms

    — Associated Press

    Photo: A Chihuahua peers out of its cage at an L.A.-area animal shelter. Credit: Genaro Molina / Los Angeles Times