Blog

  • Detroit 2010: Dodge Nitro Detonator is massively yellow

    Filed under: , ,

    Dodge Nitro Detonator – Click above for high-res image gallery

    Dodge is rolling out three special edition Nitros here at the Detroit Auto Show named Heat, Detonator and Shock. For now, we’re focusing on the Detonator, a massively loud yellow mid-size SUV. Aside from the eye-scorching paint, the Nitro Detonator gets standard 20-inch wheels, eight premium speakers hooked into a 368-watt amp plus a nine-inch subwoofer. Tinted glass, too.

    The real news, however, is the engine. All three special edition Nitros get an aluminum 4.0-liter V6 that makes 23 percent more horsepower and 12 percent more torque. Specifically, the overhead cam V6 pumps out 260 hp and 265 lb-ft of torque. That’s some decent grunt, though a 4.0-liter-V6-powered Nissan Pathfinder makes 266 hp and 288 lb-ft of torque. However, the Nitro Detonator has gray stripes on the hood. Costs $25,995, too.

    Photos by Drew Phillips / Copyright (C)2010 Weblogs, Inc.

    Detroit 2010: Dodge Nitro Detonator is massively yellow originally appeared on Autoblog on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:55:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments


    Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]

    Read Original Article

  • Detroit 2010: Audi e-tron take zwei… or drei? [w/video]

    Filed under: , , , ,

    Audi e-tron Detroit Concept – Click above for high-res image gallery

    Audi is serious about EVs. Over the last four months, the four-ringed automaker has put out three (well, really 2.5) electric vehicle concepts: the first e-tron in Frankfurt, a repainted, slightly modified version in LA, and now this, the third e-tron – easily the best iteration to date.

    Slightly shorter yet just as wide as its predecessors, the Motown e-tron is a refined version of the concepts that came before it, with electric motors driving each wheel and putting out a total of 204 horsepower and 1,955 pound-feet of torque (through some creative mathematics).

    Comprised of an aluminum spaceframe coupled with a smattering of carbon fiber bodywork, the e-tron tips the scales at 2,976 pounds (550 pounds less than the previous concepts). With its reduced weight, more refined packaging and reworked drivetrain, the e-tron hits 60 mph in 5.9 seconds and – more tellingly – dispatches the run from 37 to 75 in 5.1 seconds. Audi claims the e-tron can run on a single charge for 155 miles after topping up from a 230-volt socket for 11 hours.

    Along with a reworked interior, a new heat pump to boost efficiency and adaptive headlamps that modify their brightness and direction based on weather and steering input. Naturally, Quattro is part of the package, with the torque-vectoring all-wheel-drive system splitting the power 40:60 front-to-rear.

    Audi restated that a production version of the e-tron will go on sale in late 2012, and this most recent concept is a clearer indication of what we’ll see on the road in two year’s time. Not only that, but Audi insists that the name “e-tron” will be a brand within the brand – like Quattro is today – and that means more e-tron-equipped models are most definitely in our future. Make the jump for all the details.
    ,

    Photos by Drew Phillips / Copyright (C)2010 Weblogs, Inc.

    Continue reading Detroit 2010: Audi e-tron take zwei… or drei? [w/video]

    Detroit 2010: Audi e-tron take zwei… or drei? [w/video] originally appeared on Autoblog on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:28:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments


    Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]

    Read Original Article

  • The Iron Curtain Kept Invasive Species Out of Eastern Europe | Discoblog

    cold-warThe Cold War didn’t just restrict the movement of people, ideas, and trends in rock n’ roll, according to a new study–it also kept invasive species from moving into Eastern Europe.

    Researchers looked at the number of non-native birds present in both Western and Eastern Europe over the past century. Before the Cold War restricted trade on the continent, Western Europe had 36 alien bird species and Eastern Europe had 11. By the time the Berlin Wall fell and the Iron Curtain crumbled, the number of alien birds in Western Europe had increased to 54, but the number in Eastern Europe had declined to five.

    A National Geographic blog explains:

    “Global trade is a real concern for invasive species, and the lessons we can learn from the Cold War offer a warning flag to developing countries that are now expanding in an international economy,” said Susan Shirley, a research associate in the College of Forestry at Oregon State University.

    Although birds can fly over walls and through no-fly zones, the researchers say they usually stick to their native territories; however, when imported pet birds are released into the wild they can carve out a niche in the new land. The new findings, reported in the journal Biological Conservation, suggest that Eastern Europe may now be filling up with avian aliens. Anybody remember if Pink Floyd released any doves during that concert on the wall?

    Related Content:
    DISCOVER: Humans vs Animals: Our Fiercest Battles With Invasive Species
    Discoblog: Beware the Gray Squirrels! Brits Campaign to Kill All “Alien” Species
    Discoblog: The Humane Way to Kill Invasive Cane Toads: Skull Smashing?
    80beats: Ravenous, Leaping Asian Carp Poised to Invade Great Lakes

    Image: Wikimedia Commons


  • Does Location Need a Special Purpose Device?

    Qualcomm is trying to patent a removable module for devices that would contain all of your location information and allow you to share it across gadgets (hat tip GoRumors). Instead of your phone or laptop knowing where you are at all times, you plug in a module when you want to share your whereabouts. Now, this is just a patent application, so it’s not clear if anyone at Qualcomm wants to build this thing, and I’m not sure it should.

    At first I thought the module might do for location what the Kindle has done for electronic readers or what the iPod did for stand-alone music devices — basically act as a single-purpose device for providing location and applications that could use it. Here’s the description:

    The removable module may store subscription information, personal information, and/or other information for a user and may be inserted into a terminal, e.g., a cellular phone. The removable module may include LBS applications that may utilize location information to perform various actions. The location information may comprise a location estimate, speed, orientation, etc., of the terminal.

    In other words, my location would become an accessory that I could plug in when I elect to share with people where I am and what I’m doing, rather than something tied to a particular device with complicated steps for turning location sharing on and off. Plus, I could use a variety of location apps that work with the module rather than applications that work with a specific phone.

    Since the device would have my location as well as my location-using applications, I checked with some developers and those in the industry to see how something like this would play out. Rahul Sonnad, CEO of Geodelic, which makes the Sherpa application, said that most of the functionality Qualcomm seems to have developed with this module is already available as part of various web-connected platforms like Facebook Connect. He added, “I’m sure I would lose this module, and my location would be lost with it. And then where would I be?”

    Without a location module, many of us might not know. All kidding aside, Sonnad’s point about already having the functionality is the key here. Sonnad as well as Ted Morgan, the CEO of Skyhook, which provides a Wi-Fi database to determine a user’s location, think that thanks to Apple, Google and other platforms already offering location services on myriad devices and shared between a variety of web-based technologies, the opportunity ship has sailed. And it’s sailed without Qualcomm. What do you guys think?

    Thumbnail image courtesy of Flickr user Chokola. Diagram image courtesy of GoRumors.

  • Enterprise 2.0 Company Results: How Good is Good News?

    Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for jive-logo-sept.jpgIt’s exciting for us to see young companies like Jive grow so fast. But before we pop the champagne bottles, it’s important to take these results with a grain of salt.

    Jive announced today that it had record results for the past year, up 85%. That’s impressive in the sense that Jive is proving that its technology is gaining acceptance in the market and the fact that the company, founded in 2001, is almost 10 years old.

    But we also need to consider that with any young company, there’s a lot riding on news like this.

    Sponsor

    Jive has some big-league investors. It’s critical that Jive shows them that all is going well and the road ahead is paved with gold.

    That may well be the case. Jive is an important player in the emerging Enterprise 2.0 space. Along with its record revenues, Jive also announced that its bookings are up and its employee count now stands at 200 people, up 50%. Also, its Jive World event in 2010 will be twice as big as last year’s.

    So, hats off to Jive in that regard for showing us, as an example, that its employee count is up. They are doing well, no doubt about it. But we have no idea how the results compare to last year and what the size of these deals look like. Jive does not share this information, as is the case with most private companies. It is up to us to make our own judgements about what’s really is meaningful.

    We made the same point last week about Socialtext posting record results. We were equally curious about its results, too.

    All of these companies reporting great news is a sign that the Enterprise 2.0 space is growing, but we need to be careful not to get too excited. Young companies can grow very fast. But it’s all relative compared to big companies. Numbers can look impressive but more often than not, you need to look at a number of factors before making any quick calls on how the company is actually faring in the market.

    Discuss


  • U.S. Energy Dept. kicks off 2010 with billions for cleantech

    government_grants_250x251Last week was a big one for private investing in cleantech, with close to ten companies in the sector getting funding — Coda Automotive, EcoFactor and Nordic Windpower among them. But on Friday, and now today, the government has stepped in to shower green businesses with cash, unveiling a series of big announcements worth millions for clean energy manufacturers, green-collar employers and — most recently — projects focusing on vehicle efficiency.

    The latest, a package of $187 million in stimulus grants and matching funds from private industry, is being divided between nine projects working on how to make trucks and passenger vehicles more fuel efficient. Slated to create as many as 500 jobs for researchers and engineers and 6,000 by 2015 for assembly-workers, the aim is slash the amount of gasoline used every day in the U.S. by 100 million gallons. The byproduct of this would be reducing vehicle emissions by 20 percent by 2030, the DOE says.

    A big chunk of the money, about $115 million, will go to projects making freight trucks 50 percent more fuel efficient. The goal is for them to produce technology they can actually demonstrate by 2015. They were looking into strategies like making trucks more aerodynamic, cutting down on idling, and recovering waste heat. The other six projects will receive $71 million, each working toward engines that could improve gas mileage by 25 to 40 percent for average drivers by 2015.

    To highlight a few, Daimler Trucks North America got $39.5 million to downsize engines and electrify oil and water pumps to make long-haul trucks more efficient; Chrysler received $14.5 million to downsize engines and recirculate exhaust gases in its minivan model; Ford got $15 million to improve mid- and large-sedan gas mileage by 25 percent; General Motors landed $7.7 million to test a new emissions control system that could improve its Chevy Malibu’s fuel economy by 25 percent.

    The DOE’s cleantech gravy train started rolling on Friday, with President Barack Obama announcing that it will award 183 manufacturing facilities across the country with 30 percent tax credits, amounting to $2.3 billion. The idea is to create more than 58,000 new jobs for people who have been laid off from traditional American manufacturing industries, like automaking. As a byproduct, it should also up American exports in the sector, and stimulate private investment in the clean energy industry.

    Manufacturers will be selected from an applicant pool of 500 based on the nature of their technology, the likelihood of them being commercially successful, the number of domestic jobs they would create, how fast they could get up and running, and whether or not they will lead to a substantial decrease in greenhouse gas emissions. Recipients will be notified by mid-April.

    The contenders are spread across the country and various areas of the business, including fuel cells, solar, wind and geothermal equipment, carbon capture devices, renewable fuel refineries and plug-in components for electric vehicles.

    Shifting focus from domestic cleantech, on Friday, the DOE also selected three overseas organizations that it plans to collaborate with to advance low-emissions technologies. The Energy Efficiency Center in Costa Rica, partnered with the Natural Resources Defense Council, will train professionals to use energy-efficient techniques and devices, as well as produce research on related topics. The Organization of American States will work with governments in the Caribbean to teach sustainable practices and install more renewable energy systems. And the Dominica Wind Project will attempt to expand distributed wind power in a move away from big turbine farms.


    Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]

    Read Original Article

  • Sony Ericsson Xperia X2a appears on US site screaming ‘I’m coming!’

    Whoa! After two months of delay Sony Ericsson’s finally done something with the Xperia X2 — giving it an extra ‘a’ (for North America) instead of pushing it out to us mere mortals. Mind you, the number of times we’ve seen this thing — even as a KIRF — may fool you into thinking it’s been out since forever, but the reality is it’s slowly morphing into a unicorn. You know what though? If we wait for another two months, the X2 / X2a might even get a piece of that Windows Mobile 7 action. Or Windows Mobile 8, when SE’s eventually done with its siesta.

    Sony Ericsson Xperia X2a appears on US site screaming ‘I’m coming!’ originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:50:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink   |  sourceSony Style USA  | Email this | Comments

    Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]

    Article

  • Gambridge Z line MIDI guitars compatible with Rock Band, sort of sound like guitars

    There’s always someone that will tell you that you can make the Rock Band experience more “realistic,” as if there was something more realistic than pressing buttons on a piece of plastic that vaguely resembles a guitar. And believe us, there was no shortage of companies with Guitar Hero / Rock Band controllers at CES — including Gambridge, whose Z line of dual game / MIDI guitars are full-sized instruments with built in sound modules that also function as game controllers, compatible with all major music video game titles. And, judging by what we saw at the company’s booth, their industrial design assures that no one will ever dream of stealing one from you. Pricing and availability to be announced.

    Gambridge Z line MIDI guitars compatible with Rock Band, sort of sound like guitars originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:29:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink   |  sourceGambridge  | Email this | Comments

    Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]

    Article

  • Phishing Android apps explain our maxed-out credit cards



    There’s no such thing as a perfect mobile app store strategy — you’re either too draconian, too arbitrary, or too loose in your policies, and as far as we can tell, there’s no way to find a balance that isn’t going to trigger an alarm here and there or get a few people worked into a lather. If you’re too loose, for instance, you’re liable end up with the occasional bout of malware, which is exactly what appears to have gone down recently in the Android Market with a few fake banking apps published by a bandit going as “Droid09.” As you might imagine, the apps end up doing little more than stealing your information and ending your day in tears; the apps have since been pulled, but that’s probably little consolation for those already affected. The moral of the story? Be vigilant, keep a close eye on those system permissions the Market warns you about as you install new apps, report sketchy ones, and — as always — use a hearty dose of common sense.

    Phishing Android apps explain our maxed-out credit cards originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:07:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink Slashdot  |  sourceFirst Tech Credit Union  | Email this | Comments

    Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]

    Article

  • Marvel Claims Jack Kirby Was Just A Workerbee; Has No Right To Reclaim Copyright On Marvel Characters

    Last fall, we wrote about how the heirs of famed comic artist Jack Kirby had started alerting everyone that he intended to reclaim his copyrights on various popular comic characters, such as Spiderman, the Hulk, Iron Man, The Avengers and others, using the termination right in copyright law that was recently used by the heirs of one of the creators of Superman to reclaim some of those rights. Not surprisingly, Marvel, who owns many of the characters that Kirby’s heirs want to take back, isn’t particularly pleased about this (especially since many of those characters have recently become extremely lucrative movie franchises). So it has gone to court to insist that Kirby had no right to the characters and that his work with Marvel was a “work for hire” situation, where Marvel retains all the copyrights. Kirby’s heirs, not surprisingly, disagree. They point out that Kirby worked out of his own house as a freelancer with no contract or employment agreement.

    I have to admit that I’m not a fan of the termination right for copyright, because it makes a huge mess of things. However, given that it’s there, it’s really pretty sickening the lengths to which big entertainment companies will go to try to block creators from using it. Remember, these are the same giant entertainment companies who will insist time and time again that they need special government protections to “protect the artists.” But any chance they get they’ll screw those artists over. You may recall the attempt a decade ago by the RIAA to change copyright law in the middle of the night (literally) by having a staffer slip four words into a larger piece of legislation that would have avoided some of these termination claims. The entertainment industry has no interest in protecting the artists. It only wants to protect its bottom line — and if that means screwing over the artists, it will do so at every turn.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story





  • Bizarre Republican Lies About Obama, Tax Policy

    Here’s a column /slash/ GOP strategy memo published in the Wall Street Journal. It’s predictably uncontaminated by insight or fresh thinking. But there’s this one bit that’s practically begging for a smackdown:

    The surpluses of the late ’90s were to a significant extent a product
    of the growth in revenues that came after the capital gains tax was
    cut. The Democrats’ theology–actually economic superstition–prohibits
    them from renewing the 2003 tax cuts, the looming expiration of which
    has been a drag on the economy ever since they recaptured Congress.

    These are two bizarre sentences. The first is merely questionable. The second is a little more pernicious.

    Did the surpluses of the late ’90s occur after President Clinton cut
    the capital gains tax rate from 28% to 20%? Yes, they did. But that
    doesn’t mean that capital gains tax cuts created the surplus. Surpluses are the result of rising tax receipts and falling
    outlays. And look what happened to government spending as a percent of GDP during the ’90s. It fell, by a lot.
    570 govtincomeoutlay.jpgBut look! That purple income line crashes in 2002 — after the capital gains tax cut and the Bush tax cut in 2001. Why? As Pete Davis points out,
    capital gains revenues increased 0.7% of GDP from 1994 through 2000
    under President Clinton, and they fell 0.6% of GDP from 2000 to 2004
    under President Bush. This isn’t very hard to explain (it’s not even all Bush’s fault). Tax revenue
    exploded during the tech boom, imploded after the burst, and continued
    to fall after the Bush tax cuts. I’m not sure what the ideal capital gains rate should be. But I see no reason why the turn of the century should go down as victory parade for the impact of low capital gains taxes.

    But it gets worse. Just one sentence after praising a Democratic president’s tax cut, the author bashes Democrats for being theologically (is that really the mot juste?) opposed to extending the Bush tax cuts. Bizarre. But this sentence isn’t merely inconsistent with the paragraph. It’s the exact opposite of what President Obama has repeatedly promised: Extending the Bush tax cuts for 90 to 95 percent of payers, while increasing the capital gains and income tax on the top percentiles.

    Finally, Judge invokes Ricardian equivalence to claim that this phantom tax increase — which hasn’t happened and isn’t likely to happen — is somehow spooking the economy. Could he be more obtuse and misleading? It’s one thing to falsely characterize the president’s tax policy. It’s another to claim that your false characterization is imposing “a drag on the economy.”

    I really don’t like this paragraph.




    Email this Article
    Add to digg
    Add to Reddit
    Add to Twitter
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to StumbleUpon
    Add to Facebook



  • “Glee” Renewed For Second Season; Nationwide Talent Search Kicks Off For New Stars

    Gleeks rejoice! FOX has ordered a second season of its hit musical comedy, Glee, network entertainment president Kevin Reilly announced on Monday.

    “We loved ‘Glee’ ever since it was a pilot script, so it’s been an incredible thrill to watch the show take root and see audiences embrace these characters in such a huge way this season,” Reilly, said in a statement. “The show is a true and rare gem in television.”

    Glee focuses on a group of high school misfits who are marching to the beats of the drums by trying to revive the school’s glee club. The show is up for four awards at this weekend’s Golden Globes including Best Actor in a Comedy Series for Matthew Morrison, and Best Actress in a Comedy Series for Lea Michele.

    In addition to the renewal news, Glee executive producers are holding a nationwide casting call to fill three new roles that will be added to the series in its second season. The casting search will air as a multi-part special leading up to the premiere of season two.

    “’Glee’ has always been about finding new fresh exciting voices. Our second season search for young talent will be in the vein of our first season. We launched a nationwide search for talent for our first season with great unexpected results, and Season Two expands that search in an even bigger way,” said executive producer and creator Ryan Murphy.

    Auditions will be open to “amateur individuals,” between the ages of 16 and 26. For more details, log on to www.fox.com/glee.

    All-new episodes of Glee return April 13 @ 9 PM on FOX.


  • Harper underestimates Facebook at his own peril (by David Eaves for G&M)

    David Eaves has an insightful piece entitled “Harper underestimates Facebook at his own peril” in the G&M today. I am posting it here for the record with emphasis and notes to be added when I can find some free time.

    ***

    Harper underestimates Facebook at his own peril

    “As the Prime Minister knows from last year’s anti-coalition campaign, online activism can be a powerful political tool”

    by David Eaves
    Special to The Globe and Mail
    Published on Monday, Jan. 11, 2010 10:46AM EST

    Over at the National Post, Matt Gurney recently stated that “Facebook groups are just about the dumbest way to advocate a political cause.” His comments echo those of a number of pundits and politicians who give online activism – and Facebook groups in particular – short shrift.

    For a variety of reasons online activism is discounted as not being “real” politics. Well, Facebook isn’t going to remake politics, but it does matter – something the explosive growth of the 150,000 person (and rising) group Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament and the first anniversary of the anti-coalition Facebook campaign offers us a chance to reflect on. So here are three lessons on online activism for the Prime Minister, the news media and the rest of us.

    1. Taking out the trash is no more

    Back on Dec. 30, when Stephen Harper decided to shut down Parliament, John Ibbitson called it a record “take out the trash day .” Journalists use this expression to describe government’s nasty habit of burying stories by releasing them on Friday afternoons, ideally before a long weekend.

    Such tactics worked because traditional media believed the public wouldn’t read a story that by Monday would be considered “old” (old being three days ago). Social media sites like Facebook break this cycle by allowing people to self-identify as members of an interested audience (and electorate).

    A 150,000-strong Facebook group means the prorogation story now has a built-in audience. Since a really big story on the Globe website can receive 100,000 pages views in a day, a 150,000 group (which hints at a still much larger audience) is a tempting target for investigative journalists and political commentators hoping to attract the attention of readers. Consequently, Facebook activism takes a story that five years ago might have been buried and gives it strong, powerful legs.

    2. Lower barriers to entry are a strength, not a weakness

    Easily the biggest fallacy around online politics is the belief that because something is easy, it doesn’t matter. Joining a Facebook group is easy; marching is hard. So pay attention to marchers and ignore Facebook groups, the reasoning goes.

    But a Facebook group’s low barrier to entry allows people to join who might have been uncomfortable marching (read mainstream voters). Indeed, Facebook is particularly clever about this. When logged in and looking at a group’s members, it will list your friends first. This makes the group more inviting than if it you showed you a pack of strangers you weren’t sure you could trust.

    Facebook and other social media campaigns nudge people who might have previously ignored an issue into become more aware and mobilized. Indeed, this appears to be happening with Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament. A number of smaller, city-based sub-groups are springing up with the goal of organizing local rallies. Suddenly people who didn’t care about an issue are willing to march. It is arguably also what happened last year during the anti-coalition rallies organized by conservative bloggers.

    Yes, the Facebook group is a low rung on the ladder of political engagement – but that makes it more powerful, not less so.

    3. Look at the impact, not the medium

    The same critics who ignore Facebook and social media because “it’s easy” have also taken their eye off the prize. Why do citizens march? Ultimately, to raise awareness among the broader public, gain more support and force a change (usually at the ballot box). These happen to be the same goals of a Facebook group.

    In this regard, a Facebook group is a rally, and assessing effectiveness around how hard it is to join is like assessing the effectiveness of an athlete by how much they train instead of how they perform on game day. What matters is not the barrier to entry, but how much awareness the group brings to the cause – which, in this particular case, is a great deal.

    Indeed, if the anti-prorogation group is smart, it will announce it intends to keep the group running until the next election and no further. This will make it clear to its members that they want them to connect their online activism with their voting intention – and the group will serve as a persistent reminder of the current Prime Minister’s choices regarding accountability and democracy.

    Of course, Mr. Harper whould understand how powerful online activism can be since, last year, he benefited from a popular Facebook group opposed to a coalition government. But while that effort worked in his favour, the next three months are likely going to be long and uncomfortable for the Prime Minister as the media and an activist public refuse to let him forget his recent choices very quickly.

    David Eaves is a public-policy entrepreneur, open government activist and negotiation expert based in Vancouver

    Posted in Calgary, Canada, people, politics

  • Plexiglass Lamp or Minimalist Disco Ball? [Lighting]

    Either way, I’d love to hang it from my ceiling, crank up the hi-fi, and jam out to some Peaches & Herb.

    The Plexiglass Lamp hides its bulb behind a half-sphere of transparent plexiglass rods. The rods have matte tips, making them glow while the transparent rods disappear into darkness. It’s also energy efficient, according to the designers at Leeuw & Vormgeving, but that’s not the important thing, is it? Of course not. The important thing is finding enough polyester to wear for your groovetastic Plexiglass Lamp parties. [Leeuw & Vormgeving via The Design Blog]







  • Lesnar training partner and NCAA champ jumping into MMA

    While wrestling for the University of Minnesota, Cole Konrad had to follow in Brock Lesnar’s footsteps. Konrad went on to best Lesnar, winning two national championships to Lesnar’s one. After training with Lesnar, Konrad is going to try his hand at MMA.

    Konrad battled with Olympian Steve Mocco for both of Konrad’s national titles. At that point in NCAA Division I wrestling, Mocco and Konrad ruled the roost and though Mocco won matches during the season, it was Konrad who won their epic, overtime battles at the national finals. One of the other top heavyweights in that time period? UFC heavyweight Cain Velasquez. 

  • China powers the global green tech revolution

    by Todd Woody

    Forget Red China. It’s Green China these days—at least when it comes to making big renewable deals.

    eSolar power plant. Friday night, a Chinese developer and eSolar of Pasadena, Calif., signed an agreement to build solar thermal power plants in the Mongolian desert over the next decade. These plants would generate a total of 2,000 megawatts of electricity. It’s the largest solar thermal project in the world and follows another two-gigawatt deal China struck in October with Arizona’s First Solar for a massive photovoltaic power complex. Altogether, the eSolar and First Solar projects would produce, at peak output, the amount of electricity generated by about four large nuclear power plants, lighting up millions of Chinese homes.

    Is China the new California, the engine powering the green tech revolution?

    Yes and no. When it comes to technological and entrepreneurial innovation, Beijing lags Silicon Valley (and Austin, Boston, and Los Angeles)—for now. But as a market, China is likely to drive demand for renewable energy, giving companies like eSolar the opportunity to scale up their technology and drive down costs.

    [We’ll pause here to state the obvious: China’s investment in renewable energy and other green technologies is miniscule compared to the resources devoted to its continued building of coal-fired power plants and efforts to secure dirty oil shale supplies in Canada and elsewhere.]

    “All the learning from this partnership will help us in the United States,” Bill Gross, eSolar’s founder and chairman, told me. “I think as soon as the economy improves in the rest of the world and banks start lending, there will be a lot of competition in the U.S. and Europe. But, until then, China has the money and the demand.”

    In a one-party state, a government official saying, “Make it so,” can remove obstacles to any given project and allocate resources for its development. Construction of the first eSolar project, a 92-megawatt power plant, in a 66-square-mile energy park in northern China, is set to begin this year

    “They’re moving very fast, much faster than the state and U.S. governments are moving,” says Gross, who is licensing eSolar’s technology to a Chinese firm, Penglai Electric, which will manage the construction of the power plants. Another Chinese company will open and operate the projects.

    For the past two-and-a-half years in California, meanwhile, the state’s first new solar thermal power plant in two decades has been undergoing licensing as part of an extensive environmental review process.  The goal is to maximize production of carbon-free electricity from BrightSource Energy’s 400-megawatt Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System project in the Mojave Desert while minimizing its impact on fragile ecosystems.

    The end game begins Monday in Sacramento at a public hearing where BrightSource will face off with environmental groups that argue the project will harm the imperiled desert tortoise and destroy the habitat for a host of plants and animals.

    In contrast, it was only six months ago that executives from Penglai Electric first contacted eSolar as they scoured the world for a technology to use in that nation’s first big foray into solar thermal power.

    China leads the world in production of photovolatic panels like those found on residential and commercial rooftops, but the country has had little experience with solar thermal technology, which uses arrays of mirrors called heliostats to heat a liquid to create steam that drives an electricity-generating turbine.

    Penglai executives flew to Los Angeles last fall to meet with Gross and examine a five-megawatt demonstration power station called Sierra that eSolar brought online in August in the Southern California exurb of Lancaster. “A parade of people came over—we probably had 20 different government officials from China come to look at Sierra and review its operation,” said Gross.

    “The most convincing aspects of eSolar’s technology is the fact that it is the only commercially operating technology in North America,” Eric Wang, a Penglai Electric spokesman, told me in an email.

    That’s not quite correct—a solar trough plant was recently built in Nevada and solar power plants from the 1980s continue to operate in California—but eSolar’s technology is particularly suited for China.

    As I wrote in a Green State column about eSolar last year, eSolar’s innovation is its sophisticated software controls systems and imaging technology which controls heliostats that focus the sun’s rays on a tower that contains a water-filled receiver. That allows the company to use small mirrors packed closely together as the software positions them to create a virtual parabola to focus sunlight. The mirrors are cheap to make and easy to install.

    “When we do solar fields in California, we use $8 labor to open up the fields,” said Gross. “It takes 15 minutes training. In China, they wanted to use untrained labor as well.”

    Since eSolar can place the mirrors close together—its standard 46-megawatt solar farm has 176,000 of them—the power plants needs half the land of an equivalent photovoltaic farm, according to Gross—a feature attractive to China, Wang said.

    China, however, is not merely importing eSolar’s technology. Biomass power plants will be built alongside the solar farms and will use the same turbines, cutting the project’s costs and allowing the energy complex to operate when the sun goes down. The sand willow plant, a shrub planted in the surrounding region to fight desertification, will provide the fuel for the biomass power plants, according to Penglai Electric.  ESolar already makes its heliostats in China and will begin manufacturing its proprietary receiver technology there as well.

    While eSolar, which counts Google among its investors, retains ownership of the intellectual property behind its solar technology, China will gain valuable experience building and operating large-scale renewable energy facilities. 

    Much the same is happening in the nascent electric car industry, where China is pushing ahead and partnering with California companies like Coda Automotive to develop advanced battery technology.

    All of which is not necessarily a bad thing. But one has to wonder if it won’t be too long before we’re cruising down the Pacific Coast Highway in our Chinese-made electric car and plugging it in to our Chinese-made solar array.

     

     

    Related Links:

    2010 outlook for solar in California

    Developing nations continue to lead post-Copenhagen

    Copenhagen revealed a new dynamic between the U.S. and China






  • Why Calls Sound So Good on Nexus One: The Audience A1026 Voice Processor [Guts]

    The reason calls on the Nexus One sound great is Audience’s A1026 voice processor, which works with its dual mics to pluck out voice, eliminate background and dynamically adjust audio properties. I hope it goes standard, like oleophobic screens. [VentureBeat]







  • Nothing Wrong With Google Promoting Nexus One Through Free WiFi

    In my travels, I have paid for WiFi a couple of times so I appreciate when I can get access internet for free. When this is the case, I don’t mind getting some ads or having to fill-out a form to briefly share my impressions about the coffee shop I am visiting.  In case you haven’t heard, Google is offering free WiFi in a number of airports (almost) all over the U.S. Not only that, but also in free flight with Virgin America. They also pledged to match donations made via participating WiFi networks, up to a maximum of $250,000. A kind gesture…

    Lately, there’s been outrage or disbelief about Google’s intentions because they are using this offer to promote the Nexus One by redirecting to the phone’s page. The nerve of them to advertise one of their own products!  Well, let’s just be clear, Google is not the Red Cross.  They are in business to make money. They make us believe that they give away all of their products and services for free but they have a very profitable business model based on advertising.  We’ve been accepting free things from them for a long time in exchange for advertising.  What’s wrong with this one?