Blog

  • Are There Any Celebrity Quotes That Had Disastrous Consequences?

    The tough part of being a celebrity is all the talking you have to do. Interviews, press conferences, paparazzi following you around asking questions – all of these situations and more give any celebrity plenty of chance to say one dumb thing. It’s bound to happen when you talk that much.

    But sometimes, that small, seemingly innocent quote, can lead to a huge mess. Simply trying to give someone a new twist on an answer you’ve given hundreds of times can get you in deep trouble.

    Here are some examples…


    Paul Newman Said…

    “24 hours in a day, 24 beers in a case. Coincidence? I think not.”

    You’ve probably heard that expression a lot. Maybe one day at a party you overheard the extremely drunk guy say it in an attempt to make people think that he can have some good old fashioned fun, even in face of the fact that his propensity for drinking himself in to oblivion makes everyone worry.

    The seemingly innocuous quote eventually turned in to a monster when college students around the country began celebrating a day called “Newman Day.” On Newman Day, students do just as the quote suggests: They drink one beer every hour, all day – all while still showing up to all of their classes. While this tradition had wormed its way in to dozens of colleges and universities around the United States, it wasn’t until it hit Princeton University that Paul Newman found out about the holiday created in his honor.

    He wasn’t very happy about it. Reason being, Newman’s son Scott passed away due to a drug overdose, which led to Newman starting his own foundation that promoted substance abuse prevention through education.

    Students getting drunk in class are a bit contradictory to Newman’s beliefs to say the least.  
    Newman asked Princeton to stop promoting this “holiday.” Princeton representatives said that Newman Day was not a school sponsored event, that it was a campus tradition that they had no control over.

    It was at this point that Newman and Princeton teamed up to spread the word of the dangers of Newman Day. While the day is still celebrated, the number of yearly at Princeton has declined.

    But the funny thing about this quote and its attribution to Paul Newman is that Newman probably never even said the quote. It is reported that Newman once said it during a speech he once gave to a college, a speech that there is no record of. So why the quote was even attributed to Newman in the first place is a bit of a mystery, but he took responsibility for its consequences anyway.


    NBA player Kevin Garnett said…


    “This is it. It’s for all the marbles. I’m sitting in the house loading up the pump, I’m loading up the Uzis, I’ve got a couple of M-16s, couple of nines, couple of joints with some silencers on them, couple of grenades, got a missile launcher. I’m ready for war.”

    Kevin Garnett is known as one of the best players in the NBA. He’s a dominating presence that recently led the Boston Celtics to their first NBA championship in quite a long time. But before he began his stint with the Celtics, Garnett was a member of the Minnesota Timberwolves, a team that was good, but never quote good enough, even with his superstar skills on the court.

    Back in 2004, Garnett’s Timberwolves where in the middle of a hotly contested playoff series with the Sacramento Kings.  The quote above was given in the lead up to the deciding game in the series. Of course, as most athletes tend to do, Garnett equated the game to a war, to preparing for a battle that might get ugly.

    Now, these kinds of quotes are tossed around a lot in the world of sports. The intensity of a rivalry can sometimes get hyped up to the point of extreme hyperbole. So a quote like Garnett’s is actually fairly generic, even if it is a little bit extreme. So the real problem with the quote wasn’t the quote itself, but the timing of the quote.

    Garnett said this in May of 2004, a time when the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were at their bloodiest and most ugly.  Needless to say, soldiers and the families of soldiers that were serving in these wars were pretty ticked off that a man playing a game for a living would compare his job to that of a person being shot at in a battle. The NBA and the Timberwolves were showered in complaints.

    Soon thereafter, Garnett gave a rather lengthy apology in which he really could have just summed up with the words, “I was being an idiot, I’m sorry.” After that, the anger died down some.

    But then it got sparked all over again when the center for the Sacramento Kings, Brad Miller, decided to throw his hat in to the hyperbole ring, this time as a bit of a mocking gesture directed at Garnett. He said, “I’m bringing my shotgun, my bow and arrow, my four-wheel drive truck, and four wheelers and run over him.”

    By this point, no one really cared about the somewhat insensitive quotes that much, and Garnett and his Timberwolves eventually went on to defeat the Kings in that playoff round.


    Hilary Clinton said…

    “I’m not sitting here like some little woman standing by my man like Tammy Wynette.”

    Way back in 1968, there was a country singer by the name of Tammy Wynette. Tammy had quite an impressive list of musical accomplishments behind her, but nothing – NOTHING – she ever did could even compare to the popularity of her famous song “Stand By Your Man,” a song about a woman’s love for her man – a love that will allow the woman to overlook the man’s faults and mistakes.

    While soon-to-be President Bill Clinton was campaigning for the spot of Commander in Chief, he was also embroiled within one of what would eventually become many extra-marital affairs. This one involved a woman by the name of Gennifer Flowers (yes, it’s spelled correctly).

    In an effort to get their names and faces out there more than they already were, Bill and Hilary made an appearance on the news magazine show 60 Minutes. During the interview, the subject of Bill’s indiscretions popped up as was to be expected. Hilary, trying to portray herself as a modern independent woman, said the quote above. And it worked. She came off as a woman that would not stand idly by as he husband trampled all over her.

    But this didn’t fly with Mrs. Wynette. Tammy was furious that Hilary had basically degraded her hit single as nothing more than a woman devaluing herself. She said that Hilary had “offended every true country music fan and every person who has made it on their own with no one to take them to the White House.” This then sparked a flurry denouncements from country music radio station DJ all around the country who felt they needed to step in and side with one of their biggest stars. Many DJ’s even labeled the Clintons as “country music-hating liberals,” which added to the already arduous task of winning over southern voters.

    Hilary later apologized, and Wynette graciously accepted. In fact, they so patched things up that Wynette later performed “Stand By Your Man” at a Clinton fundraiser. This is all the more poignant given the later Monica Lewinsky scandal that Bill Clinton found himself in. Even through that, Hilary still stood by her man.


    President George H. W. Bush said…

    “Just as Poland had a rebellion against totalitarianism, I am rebelling against broccoli, and I refuse to give ground. I do not like broccoli, and I haven’t liked it since I was a little kid and my mother made me eat it. And I’m President of the United States, and I’m not going to eat any more broccoli.”

    I guess it makes sense when you think about it, but who knew there was such a thing as the “broccoli industry”? And who knew they would get so upset? Well, they do exist and they were steamed (yes, that’s a very lame steamed broccoli pun).

    When George Bush Sr. Said this somewhat amusing quote back in 1990, no one could have imagined what an impact it would have had on the popularity of this tree-like vegetable. Soon after the quote, America’s schools stopped serving broccoli, and children all across the country began to protest their broccoli servings at family dinner tables. In fact, it was reported that broccoli sales dropped significantly in 1990, all because of the president’s personal dislike of it.

    Not only was the broccoli industry upset at the quote, but they were also upset at the fact that Bush Sr. Had literally banned broccoli from being served anywhere the president happened to have been eating, especially the White House and Air Force One. This also upset nutritionists all over the country as the presidents messages basically told children that vegetables were bad for them.

    To protest the quote, broccoli growers all over the country began sending cases of the vegetable directly to the White House. President Bush then sent all of these cases to various food banks in the D.C. Area.

    It was later discovered that while broccoli may not have been on the top of everyone’s favorite foods list, it actually helps prevent certain types of cancers.

  • Brief Encounter with a Dell Latitude 2100 Kid-Friendly Netbook

    dell_lat_2100_netbook.jpg

    I had a chance to take a brief look at the touch screen…

    Dell Latitude 2100

    …aimed at the K-12 educational market with its optional touch screen, rubberized surface, optional carrying handle (I wish all netbooks had one!), and optional anti-microbial keyboard.

    It is basically a low-end kid-friendly version of the Dell Mini 10 (N270 processor and 10.1″ screen). This one was running Windows XP although Windows 7 (and Ubuntu Linux too) is available for it from Dell. Its touch screen seemed less responsive than the Asus Eee PC T91MT I’ve been using for the past week. I’m not sure if this is an artifact of the screen or because it used Windows XP instead of Windows 7.

    Its keyboard felt pretty good. And, it was nice to see actual hardware buttons for controlling sound volume and mute.

    New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

  • $39 Wasabi Mobile Photo Printer Works Fine with Droid – iPhone is a No Go

    dell_wasabi.jpg

    A friend of mine (hiya, Paul!) brought his…

    Wasabi Mobile Photo Printer (sold by Dell)

    …to the monthly tech-geek lunch yesterday. The tiny printer prints color photos at a 640×960 resolution. The photos have a slight “banded” look but otherwise looks quite good. The printer has a list price of $110 but Dell’s current price is a mere $39 (wow!). It requires special photo paper (the ink is embedded in the paper itself) which Dell sells for $10.99 in 48-sheet packs (regular price is $19.99).

    Phones connect to the printer using Bluetooth. Paul said that it doesn’t work with his iPhone but works fine with his new Droid.

    New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

  • Another One Bites the Dust: Yahoo! Go Gone on Jan. 12, 2010

    Queue up Queen’s classic foot-stomping “Another One Bites the Dust” because TechCrunch says…

    Yahoo Go Is A No Go

    Yahoo! Go is a multi-smartphone-platform app that tries to bring various Yahoo! services to the smartphone’s small mobile screen. It is one of those products that I wanted to see succeed mostly because I was such a fan of Yahoo!’s original WAP (plain text) mobile friendly website. Yahoo!’s mobile web site was my primary daily mobile web destination for news for years. So, it seemed like Yahoo! Go should be its natural successor. I even it gave it a good positive spin when I wrote briefly about it in this article for Microsoft.com a few years ago…

    Plug into the wireless world: Introduction to connected applications

    And, I really tried to like the extremely sluggish 3.0 beta release last year in this personal blog note…

    Yahoo Go 3.0 Beta Earns a Tentative Thumbs Up

    If you enjoy using Yahoo! Go, you can keep using it until January 12, 2010 12am (midnight) Pacific Standard Time.

    New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

  • Experimental Image Swirl Search Lands in Google Labs

    Google enjoys a very solid and comfortable lead in search right now and this is true for most types of searches, including image search. This doesn’t mean that it can rest on its laurels, if anything Google is the company that showed others just that, so it’s now launching a totally new way of discovering images via some interesting technologies and an experimental user interface. The new feature is called Google Image Swirl and is very similar to the Wonder Wheel view in the main search.

    “Today, we’ve launched an experimental feature in Labs called Google Image Swirl, which builds on new computer vision research to cluster similar images into representative groups in a fun, exploratory interface,” Aparna Chennapragada, product manager, and Yushi Jing, Google Research, explain the feature. “For example, if you search on Image Swirl for [washington], you’ll see 12 image thumbnails including President Washington, the Washington Monument, a map of Washington D.C. and the Capitol Building. Once you find the group of images you’re interested in, you can click on the thumbnail and a cluster of images will “swirl” into view.”

    Image Swirl is confined to Google Labs for now, but even if it doesn’t get included in the main image search in this exact form, the overall idea behind the exp… (read more)

  • Notebook Reliability is Not the Only Measure to Consider-Repair Response is Even More Important

    Interesting notebook/netbook reliability information over on Electronista.com…

    ASUS best, HP worst for notebook reliability

    Although Asus is mentioned as scoring the best with a 15.6% 3-year malfunction rate, Toshiba is breathing at its neck at 15.7%. Sony and Apple follow with 16.8% and 17.4%, respectively. Dell isn’t too far behind at 18.3%. But, Lenovo, Acer, Gateway (owned by Acer) and HP all have 20+% failure rates with HP notebooks topping the list with an expected failure of one out of every four of their notebooks. Ouch!

    However, these failure rates don’t tell the whole story. The other part of the story is just as important: What does the manufacturer do when you report a problem? In my experience, Apple and Dell have done well in dealing with my notebook problems over the years (all under extended warranty). My one experience with Acer was not a good one. A rubber foot fell off of my first generation Acer Aspire One soon after purchasing it (within 90 days). I asked what could be done (via email) expecting them to ask where to mail a replacement foot. Instead, I got what I recall to be an email run-around with no resolution. It is a good thing netbooks are cheap enough to essentially replace and upgrade on an annual basis.

    New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

  • VidZone expands in Europe

     VidZone, the free online music video service for the PS3 will be expanding to 11 new countries in Europe this month.The Netherlands, Portugal an…

  • Customizing Ubuntu 9.10

    If you have just downloaded Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala, you probably just figured out that once again the folks at Ubuntu have made this version a little bit harder to customize. When I say customize I mean change the boot splash and login screen.

    Why is that? It is because they have replaced uSplash with Xsplash and GDM with X11. So what does one have to do to pimp out this version of Ubuntu? I’ll tell you.

    To customize the login screen, you can’t simply download a GDM theme from Gnome-Look.org anymore. Now you have to change the look and feel the same way you do with your desktop, by changing the wallpaper and the metacity theme. To do that open a terminal and run the following:

    # gksudo -u gdm dbus-launch gnome-appearance-properties

    That will bring up the options to change the wallpaper, colors and settings for the login screen.

    To change Xsplash, this is actually a little easier. Go to Gnome-Look.org and do a search for ‘Xsplash’ and you will find a few boot splash screens. Go ahead and download the one of your choice. (I like the new Bauer-Puntu Xsplash screen personally ;-P) Once you download your theme, extract the contents, and copy the pictures inside to /usr/share/images/xsplash.

    Reboot, and you are good to go.

    Speaking of pimping out your Linux. I know I mentioned doing away with Bauer-Puntu, and going with a Suse based distro. Well, I changed my mind on that. Suse studio kind of sucks. No, I will make a Bauer-Puntu 9.10, but I am going a different direction with it this time. Stay tuned for the next few days for the official announcement.

  • Droid Users Can Enjoy Auto-Focus Until December 11. Then, Auto-Focus Date Bug Returns!

    owlstatue.jpg

    Remember when the first generation Zune stopped working on (I believe) December 31, 2008 because of a leap year date calculation problem? Well, Google has joined Microsoft in creating a date based bug. This item in Engadget is almost surreal…

    Motorola Droid camera autofocus fixed in secrecy? (Update: it’s a date-related self-correction)

    Here’s a comment to article attributed to a Google Android engineer: There’s a rounding-error bug in the camera driver’s autofocus routine (which uses a timestamp) that causes autofocus to behave poorly on a 24.5-day cycle. That is, it’ll work for 24.5 days, then have poor performance for 24.5 days, then work again.

    The 17th is the start of a new “works correctly” cycle, so the devices will be fine for a while. A permanent fix is in the works.

    So, Droid users (like me) should be able to auto-focus until around mid-day December 11. A Verizon technical note discussed here earlier talked about a December 11 Droid update. So, a permanent fix may be available by then.

    To be honest, I’m not too impressed by the Droid’s 5-megapixel camera so far with or without autofocus. It has a very grainy look IMHO.

    New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

  • T-Mobile Asleep at the Wheel: Still no Touch Pro2 Windows Mobile 6.5 Update

    The main reason I bought a T-Mobile HTC Touch Pro2 back in August was the promise that the Windows Mobile 6.5 upgrade would be available for it shortly after 6.5’s introduction. Windows Mobile 6.5 was launched on October 6. Here it is November 18 and T-Mobile USA shows no sign or hint of when or even if an upgrade will be made available.

    You can find an appreciable amount of venting by TP2 owners over on the…

    T-Mobile Forums focused on the Touch Pro2

    There is one bit of speculation in that forum area that an update “might” be available in December. If it is, you will probably be able to find the upgrade information and link where other T-Mobile USA Windows Mobile upgrade files are linked…

    http://www.t-mobile.com/wmupgrade/

    As usual, Microsoft and the phone’s manufacturer, HTC, appear to have nothing to say either. It is a good thing I have an iPhone and Droid to keep me busy.

    New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

  • How do you say “internet” in Arabic?

    Egypt has apparently started registering the first Arabic-language internet domain names at dot.msr during the 4th Internet Governance Forum (happening in its very own seaside resort of Sharm el-Sheikh) in a move critics of the regime’s perspective on free speech and internet freedom find hypocritical and probably on par with the US or Libya heading up the UN Human Rights Commission. The move came Monday after ICANN, the international organization that handles domain naming, began registration for non-Latin-character domain names.

    Arabic domain names could tear down the English-only internet and usher in a a new era of access and participation that could encourage Arabic businesses to engage with the web not to mention the less educated and unilingual Arabic speakers in the 22 Arabic-speaking states of the Middle East.

    Or it could usher in a time of cyber-sovereignty, with countries vying for control over who controls which languages. Will Saudi Arabia fight to control Arabic naming? What happens if someone wants to register a curse word (apparently f*ck.me was snatched up as soon as .me was made available) or a slur against Islam? I wonder how (not if) this will be regulated… What is the process for asserting ownership or making legal claims? As this professor noted “If somebody who lives in Vancouver wants to register ‘dot Tibet,’ what’s the process for objecting to that, if the Chinese government feels that’s inappropriate? And who decides what’s appropriate and what’s not?”

    But the language expansion also undermines American hegemony over the vast information infrastructure that has so impacted the daily lives of richer nations where connectivity and computer ownership are the norm. Although the majority of web pages may be in English today,this is likely to change in the near future (Chinese is predicted to become the most popular language of the internet).

    So what does this mean for the mechanics of the web business? Well, search engine optimization (or SEO in the parlance of the biz as it were) just got a lot more interesting. URLs play a key role in SEO and until now non-Latin languages were locked out of some of the most lucrative aspects of online development. For example, commercialization of the internet and use by businesses in the Arab world lags behind that of the US and Western Europe in part because Arabic is not as competitive as English online. That’s about to change.

    What do I mean by the last statement? Well, this article describes how Google, for example, determines page rank (which for many business translates into a measure of its existential worth as well as its financial and PR health)

    Google looks at many elements to determine how to rank relevance, but the URL has been one of the most paramount. That’s why people spend lots of money buying up heavily searched single- or double-word URLs. Those who jump into the search fray and buy up the new domain names consisting of heavily searched-on words, such as free, games, music, cell phones and sex, will capitalize on ranking for those words in search engines, according to Eli Feldblum CTO and founder at RankAbove, an Israeli-based SEO company.”

  • PDC 2009: Windows Server’s plan to move customers back off the cloud

    By Scott M. Fulton, III, Betanews

    PDC 2009 story bannerMuch of the value proposition for Windows Azure — the star of the show Tuesday at PDC 2009 in Los Angeles — has been its ability to open up new business avenues for customers who had not been able to envision hosting high-intensity data center operations before. Azure could give these customers a leg up, a new and more affordable way to get off the ground.

    But once they’re off the ground, the question becomes, why stay up in the air? What’s to keep those customers grounded — to mix metaphors like an old editor of mine — in the cloud? The surprise answer to that question is coming from a senior product manager for Windows Server, not Azure. Scott Ottaway told Betanews today that provisions are being planned for customers to move their deployed applications back off the Azure cloud, onto on-premises data center servers.

    “Our goal is to provide a common application platform, just the way that we support ASP.NET in both places, PHP in both places. We want to supply a common platform so customers don’t have to make the hard choice up front about where they’re going to run something.”

    During the October 2008 PDC conference when Windows Azure was first introduced, it wasn’t exactly clear who Microsoft was targeting as its customer. Thirteen months later, we have a much clearer picture of cloud services customers comprising three discrete classes: one that is made up of SMB businesses investing in affordable data center architecture for the first time, and building entirely new cloud applications that have never been tried; another made up of applications and services hosts that are simply mirroring their existing apps to the cloud space for affordability and scalability; and a third class in-between comprised of businesses of all sizes, who aren’t looking to the cloud as a migration platform, but as a way to backup, complement, or augment their existing customer services as necessary.

    The common factor between each of those classes is the need for a bridge — perhaps now, perhaps later — between their on-premise and off-premise cloud platforms. That’s the reason for Microsoft’s latest brand, announced Tuesday morning.

    Microsoft Windows Server Senior Product Manager Scott Ottaway“If you write your code for Windows Server AppFabric, it should run on Windows Azure,” said Ottaway, referring to the new mix-and-match composite applications system for the IIS platform. “What we are delivering in 2010 is a CTP [community technology preview] of AppFabric, called Windows Azure AppFabric, where you should be able to take the exact same code that you wrote for Windows Server AppFabric, and with zero or minimal refactoring, be able to put it up on Windows Azure and run it.”
    AppFabric for now appears to include a methodology for customers to rapidly deploy applications and services based on common components. But for many of these components, there will be analogs between the on-Earth and off-Earth versions, if you will, such that all or part of these apps may be translated between locales as necessary.

    “Right now, if I have an ASP.NET app running on Windows Azure, and it’s using SQL Azure, I can pull that off with minimal refactoring, in most cases, and run it on premises on Windows Server, because Windows Server supports ASP.NET via IIS, and our .NET Framework, and it supports SQL Server,” remarked Ottaway. “So I can move a certain class of apps that I have up there, off — not all.” Applications that utilize binary large object (BLOB) storage, and other Azure-specific features, would still require significant refactoring. “But if it’s just an ASP.NET app through SQL Azure, you should be able to pull it back on-premises without much effort at all.”

    Some of the more recently deployed, non-Microsoft language platforms, including PHP and MySQL, will also aid customers in that transition.

    “Whether there’s a total cost-of-ownership advantage to being off-premises or on-premises, depends on so many factors. Are you highly virtualized? Do you have really good management tools? Do you have affordable staff? Regulatory concerns? Privacy, security concerns?” remarked the Windows Server senior product manager. “There’s many, many factors that may indicate to you that…you want to keep it on-premises, or that it’s okay to go all the way off-premises. But it’s probably going to be more of a non-enterprise decision; it’s going to be project by project and app-by-app.”

    Next: Virtual machines migrate to Azure…

    Virtual machines migrate to Azure

    One of the distinguishing factors between Microsoft’s cloud platform and Amazon’s has been the distinction in what’s being served. Specifically, Amazon’s EC2 gives customers a way to deploy entire server images on its cloud, while Azure provides an active cloud-based .NET runtime for the deployment of applications rather than servers. Still, that distinction will grow fuzzier, first with last week’s announcement by Amazon of an SDK for cloud-based applications deployment, more similar to Windows Azure.

    Then there’s Microsoft’s announcement Tuesday — effectively made by Ottaway during an afternoon press conference — of a system for deploying Windows Server virtual machines to its cloud.

    Microsoft Windows Server Senior Product Manager Scott Ottaway“What we’re announcing is that we will have what we’re calling Windows Server Virtual Machine Roles on Windows Azure,” Windows Server senior product manager Scott Ottaway told a press gathering Tuesday afternoon at PDC 2009. “What these will be, are pre-configured images of Windows Server — one might have .NET [Framework] 3.5 on it, the next one might have .NET 4.0 when that’s available. And you can bring your existing app, that you’re running on-premises now on Windows Server, to Windows Azure, deploy it in this virtual machine image, and there you have existing applications support or migration — you don’t have to necessarily write new apps to take advantage of the Windows Azure service.”

    Notice the distinction still exists, if lessened a bit: VM Roles will provide Windows Server admins a way to deploy apps in the cloud as though they were being deployed on virtual machines locally. It’s still not deploying servers, like the Amazon model, but it’s closer. One big reason, Ottaway said: Customers already have applications that they paid for; they don’t want them redeveloped.

    But the other reason (and here’s the basis for Microsoft’s new value proposition for Azure) is that it makes less sense for customers to deploy servers in the cloud (including from a licensing perspective) when their goal is really to add scalability to their applications and public-facing services, not to Windows.

    “Certain companies out there say everything’s going to move off-premises, and everything’s going to be a service. But there are two issues here: Network latency, the sweet nectar of having a big pipe and fast response time, is a big inhibitor for a lot of things moving off, that might make a lot of sense. And then, you want Print Server nearby, right? You don’t want to send your print requests to Dublin [the Microsoft service, not the country] before it gets to your printer. Then for security servers and your management servers for managing all your clients, you’re definitely going to want them to be on-premises.”

    A Silverlight-based application for Kelley Blue Book, demonstrated during the Day 1 keynote at PDC 2009.

    Ottaway pointed to a compelling demonstration during the Tuesday morning keynote, of an online automobile shopping service provided by Kelley Blue Book using Silverlight. That service was devised to take advantage of a feature called cloudbursting — using the cloud where necessary, such as in periods of heavy traffic, but not necessarily as a principal deployment platform.

    “The scenario they were talking about on there was, in general, most of the time, their application and business presence runs on Windows Server and SQL Server and Silverlight. But currently, they’ve had to have a large amount of investment in server hardware, for a peak capacity that occurs very rarely across their year. And what they’re essentially using Windows Azure for [instead] is for cloudbursting, so when they do have unexpected peak capacity, they can very quickly spin up a bunch of new instances of their Silverlight application and be able to meet the demand that’s occurring.

    “The key thing that’s really interesting here — and where Microsoft, again, is differentiated from other cloud providers — is that Kelley Blue Book also wants to be able to scale down, and bring everything back on-premises when that demand isn’t as great. It’s a hybrid scenario; they’re using off-premises Windows Azure to meet their increased capacity demands. That’s a unique advantage of having a Microsoft infrastructure on-premises, as well as Windows Azure.”

    One reporter asked Ottaway today, is there a way for Azure customers to utilize any kind of capacity planning tool — to estimate what it might cost to cloudburst under varying traffic circumstances? The long answer from Ottaway — who seemed to take some inspiration from this question — was no. Online calculators do exist to help customers set caps on their expenditures, and to turn off service once those caps are exceeded to avoid tremendous billing. Azure can also provide customers with warnings in advance of heavy charges. Even with those stopgaps in place, he acknowledged, it may become cheaper for certain customers to keep their applications on-premises.

    Customers will need to consider those possibilities and scenarios for the future, Ottaway said. But for now, the templates and policies and best practices — the “solution accelerator” for the cloud, to borrow a phrase — is very much in the works.

    Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2009



    Add to digg
    Add to Google
    Add to Slashdot
    Add to Twitter
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to Facebook
    Add to Technorati



  • Help Keep Kitty Warm this Winter! Enter to Win a KatKabin! BONUS GIVEAWAY

    KatKabin

    Back in September, I told you about the KatKabin, a protective outdoor cat house that provides warmth and security. Well here’s your chance to win your very own KatKabin in a brand new color — hot pink! Just in time for the cold winter weather!

    To enter, please leave a comment on this post. One winner will be chosen in a random drawing on November 25. One entry per person. This giveaway is limited to addresses in the US and Canada.

    The KatKabin is distributed in the US by Brinsea.


  • Crackdown On Loyalty Program Scams Shows How Ridiculously Sucessful They Were

    It’s no secret that there are a bunch of companies out there that trick users into signing up for a regular monthly subscription service that’s usually nothing more than an excuse to charge your credit card every month. Many of these are incredibly sneaky, such that many users have no idea they signed up for it until they get their credit card statements. Even worse, many of the “tricks” involve getting legitimate sites to offer these “services” to their users — and those included Continental Airlines, Classmates.com, Priceline, 1-800-Flowers and many others. The government is finally cracking down on some of these, but its latest investigation — into just three such services (and there are a bunch more) named Webloyalty, Vertrue and Affinion — found that those three alone brought in over $1.4 billion. Not surprisingly, the folks who work there know quite well that they’re misleading users and tricking them into signing up for stuff they don’t want and don’t need.

    It’s a bit surprising, by the way, that the investigation was done by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, rather than the FTC, who you would think would be in charge of stopping these sorts of activities. Of course, perhaps that’s because the FTC has been quite busy with other scammers, such as BlueHippo, who the FTC had already reached an agreement with before and then decided to ignore it. The company basically collected millions from individuals without ever sending the promised computers. At one point, BlueHippo had delivered just one computer. After the FTC started investigating more thoroughly, suddenly BlueHippo found more computers to send, but still wasn’t delivering computers to many of the people who qualified.

    It’s really stunning how many blatant scammers there are out there, who are able to get away with these things for so long.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story





  • ngmoco Touch Pets Dogs Unusual Pricing Model: Will It Work?

    touchpetdogs.png

    ngmoco is probably one of the most successful iPhone game development firms. Their…

    Touch Pets Dogs

    …game is a particularly interesting product for a couple of reasons…

    First, it looks like a well drawn and thought out dog simulation descended from the amazing Nintendogs game for the original Nintendo DS. Nintendogs, more than any other game, probably convinced more parents (including me) that it was ok to buy a Nintendo DS for their child.

    Second, it has an interesting bimodal customer rating. Of the 2211 ratings, 888 gave it five stars (high) while 632 gave it one star (low). The rest of the ratings are evenly split (193 two stars, 259 three stars, and 239 four stars). This is one of those games that you either really love or really hate it seems.

    Third, it has an interesting pricing model. When I saw the free game, I assumed it had some kind in-app purchase system for purchasing virtual goods. I only played with it for a few minutes and could not find an in-app store. Instead ngmoco has a tiered model rating from free to $29.99 for a series of five versions of the same game: Free, 99 cents, $1.99, $9.99, $29.99. Each step up includes more food bowls.

    Will this model work? The free Touch Pets Dogs app is currently #4 in the Free Games Apps list. However, the only paid version in the top 100 paid games is the 99 cent version sitting at #92. I suspect some kind of in-app micropayment system might be more profitable.

    New Career Opportunities Daily: The best jobs in media.

  • Marvelous Melissa Giveaway Winners

    Giveaway Winners

    Congratulations to the five lucky winners of the giveaway from Marvelous Melissa:

    Keep an eye out for an email and make sure to let us know if you want the Three Blind Mice or the Darn! Socks. Thanks to Melissa for a truly marvelous giveaway!

  • Corruption Index today, Development Aid Reform tomorrow?

    Transparency International (TI), the international anti-corruption NGO, just released its annual corruption perceptions index (CPI).  No big surprises. This is no surprise.  Corruption does not tend to change dramatically from one year to the next.  Yet it is certainly worth reviewing the new data.

    Before so doing, a warning:  governance indices (including those we are associated with) are not highly accurate.  Therefore, precise rankings are misleading. There is a need to be transparent and precise about the extent of imprecision in each index, as well as the implications of such imprecision for comparisons across countries and over time.

    When differences between two countries are large (or the change for the same country over an 8-year period is substantial), and such change is informed by many independent sources, one can have confidence that those differences are meaningful.  Small differences in ranks or ratings imply that the two countries being compared are in a ’statistical tie’.  Yet there is such large variation in anti-corruption performance across countries, that there are many comparisons that can be made with high confidence — without pretending precision in rankings…

    New Zealand, Denmark, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland and Finland are at the top.  Comparisons among themselves, or trying to ‘anoint a ‘No. 1′ would be silly hair-splitting.  Yet one can suggest that any country in that top group does perform better than the US or France, for instance, both of which cannot be meaningfully distinguished from each other (or from Chile, for that matter…).

    On the other end of the spectrum one finds well over a dozen countries regarded by the TI index as rife with corruption, including Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Chad, Somalia, Myanmar (Burma), Equatorial Guinea, Venezuela, Haiti, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.  Conflict is rife in some, authoritarianism and extractive industries in others.

    Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan and Pakistan are among the top US development aid recipients and fare very poorly on corruption.  Nigeria, the DRof Congo (Kinshasa), Egypt, Uganda and Kenya are also large recipients of US aid and fare badly on corruption.
    This ought to be a concern, particularly now that the US government and Congress are embarking in a full fledged review of its foreign aid program.    But it is important to probe beyond the surface.  First, even if there are high levels of corruption in the country when the US provides massive aid, are there at least signs that improvements are taking place, so that there is movement in the right direction?
    Second, are the US funds helping promote improved governance and anticorruption, and thus supporting this movement in the right direction for the whole country, or is it mostly wasted?  And third, let us also look at other countries which are large recipients of US development aid, such as Colombia (where over the past decade there has been a notable improvement in anticorruption), or Ethiopia (where there is some corruption, but the real challenge is voice and democratic accountability).
    In sum, there is a need for further selectivity in development aid, not only by the US but by donors in general, but one has to look at this issue beyond Iraq and Afghanistan alone, and more broadly than anticorruption efforts alone.One healthy debate that ought to deepenIraq, Afghanistan, Sudan and Pakistan are among the top US development aid recipients and fare very poorly on corruption.  Nigeria, the DRof Congo (Kinshasa), Egypt, Uganda and Kenya are also large recipients of US aid and fare badly on corruption.

    Focusing on the group of countries that are performing very poorly on corruption, which include other dozens in addition to those listed above as well, may spur further debate about aid effectiveness.  This could be healthy.  In fact, right now in the US there are now at least three major efforts underway to review that country’s official foreign aid strategy and programs, one from the White House, another from the State Department, and yet another in the US Congress.  Indicators are key to evidence-driven policy making.

    Looking at the indices on corruption, it is simple to see that countries where the US has channeled large amounts of development aid, such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan and Pakistan, and to a large extent Nigeria, Egypt and Kenya, are not faring well on corruption.

    It would be equally simple to rationalize pulling back from development aid.  That would be simplistic and misguided, for the US, or for other bilateral or multilateral donor agency.   Yet business as usual in development aid is not an option.  [Actually, I stand corrected; continuing old practices of funneling funds seems to be the only ‘option’ being on the table in some aid agencies nowadays…]

    It is critical to probe below the surface and ask tough questions, like these ones for starters:

    1.  Even if there are high levels of corruption in the country when the US (or other donors) provide massive aid, is there evidence that improvements are taking place, and that there is a reformist leadership (not just in central government) committed to future changes — so that there is a likelihood of sustained movement in the right direction?   In other words, let us not focus on mere levels of corruption, even if dire.

    2.  Aren’t there some cases of significant aid flowing to countries where there is no endemic corruption, and what can one learn from these?   The focus on the Iraqs, Afghanistans and Pakistans can blindside one to the fact that there different country cases as well.  Colombia has been a large recipient of development aid, and over the past decade there have been notable improvements in controlling corruption.  Then in Ethiopia corruption is not endemic, another relatively large aid recipient.  Of course both countries feature other challenges (to different degrees), such as in the democratic accountability and human rights front.  Liberia, through resolute leadership, provides another potentially interesting case study in improvement in the short term.

    3.  Are the programs  funds being provided by the aid program actually helping promote improved governance and anti-corruption in meaningful way, with full country leadership and partnership?  Or are they perpetuating corrupt governments, leaders and institutions?  Or are they simply being wasted and not making a difference (while they could be making a big difference somewhere else)?

    4.  Where the public leadership and central government is entrenched and highly corrupt, what alternatives to working with central governments can be deepened?  What has worked, and what has not?

    5.  What is the exposure to corruption in the very projects and funds provided by development aid?   [This is a well known concern, and a relevant one, although often concentrating solely on this fiduciary issue has meant ignoring the all-important development effectiveness concern in the previous four sets of questions].

    Needless to say, corruption cannot be the only lens by which aid effectiveness needs to assessed.  It is often a symptom of broader governance failures. Nonetheless, a likely conclusion from a serious review of development effectiveness if governance and corruption are taken head on would be that further selectivity in aid programs may be needed.  Yet the devil will be in the details.  And in the polity.

    Further consistency in applying criteria for helping countries is also sorely needed, even if imperfectly.  The treatment of similarly corrupt governments by official donor agencies tends to be very different depending on geo-oil-politics, undermining credibility and impact.  This is just for starters, and was also part of an interesting exchange today with a journalist of Sphere/AOL News, here.   And this story in today’s NYT on the politics of corruption between the US and Equatorial Guinea is very telling.

    Plenty of work ahead.

  • Personas 1.4 Allows Users to Randomize Favorites and Undo

    Personas developers stay true to their ‘Your browser, your style!’ motto and have updated the addon to provide even more ease-of-use and customization options to users worldwide. The already well-known Firefox and Thunderbird extension has recently reached version 1.4 and got various new features, including the possibility to look for and to apply new designs from a developer users are most fond of, explore the favorite skins or undo a selection they made.

    The most important novelty that the updated Personas brings is surely the ‘More from…’ button that appears when someone chooses a Persona. For example, if someone finds a Firefox theme that best suits their preferences, they will also have the chance to periodically check back that particular developer and explore the additions. Previously, this action required accessing getpersonas.com, searching for the developer name or the design title, then clicking the page of the creator. All these actions will now be replaced by simply pressing the designated button.

    The previous flavor of the extension introduced the Favorites section. Version 1.4 further enhances it by allowing users to randomly apply a theme from the Favorites category, rather than a more general one (one can still choose to do this, if they want to browse through the more than… (read more)

  • How Much Money Did Joyent Really Raise?

    Intel today said it’s invested an undisclosed amount in Joyent, the 6-year-old Sausalito, Calif.-based startup that started out as a web hosting company but eventually evolved into a cloud service provider. Neither Intel nor Joyent disclosed the amount of money invested, but Intel’s investment in the company is a strategic bet for the chipmaker, as it faces a smaller end user base for its silicon thanks to enterprises turning to computing delivered as a service to help limit the number of servers they buy. First the deal specifics.

    Intel Capital has invested $8.5 million into the company, as per a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission.  Sources tell me that Dell has also invested an undisclosed amount of money in the company. Dell has not returned my request for comment, but the company has been supplying gear to Joyent for a long time. Joyent shifted vendors from Sun to Dell over two years ago, a move I wrote about. Previous investors in the company include Peter Thiel, former PayPal-executive-turned-hedge-fund-investor whose investments include Facebook.

    Jason Hoffman, CTO Joyent @ Structure 09 Conference

    I emailed Joyent CTO Jason Hoffman, who declined to comment on either the total funding raised or the other co-investor. He added that the company engaged with Intel Capital after meeting them at our Structure 09 conference, held in June in San Francisco. One thing led to another and eventually, the funding took place. Hoffman said that the company plans to use the money to make an aggressive push into China and other Asian economies where demand for IT infrastructure is growing at a rapid clip. (Related research note from GigaOM Pro, sub. req’d.: Why Bringing Cloud Computing to China Is Joyent’s Golden Opportunity.)

    So why the Dell and Intel interest in Joyent? I’ve been talking to a lot of folks involved with the cloud computing industry, and there has been a growing concern with the Cisco-EMC-VMware joint venture company.

    Joyent isn’t a mere service provider, but has actually built a software competency, which makes it one of the strong contenders in the cloud computing market, especially as large enterprises look to build private clouds. Joyent has been aggressively helping companies build private clouds based on its software delivered on Dell machines. There are several significant companies that are using Joyent’s offering. For Dell (or any server maker), that is the kind of push that is necessary as the bulk of enterprise customers beginning to buy their compute hardware as a service.

    In an email to his partners, Joyent CEO David Young wrote:

    Joyent plans to take cloud computing to a place where our  competitors, built on virtualization foundations such as VMware ESX, Microsoft HyperV, Xen, KVM, won’t be able to go. That made the decision to raise money a clear choice and one that translates into greater benefits for Joyent, its customers and the market-at-large. We see a clear opportunity, and we intend to race towards it.

    Intel Capital agrees with our vision for the market, as said best by Lisa Lambert, Managing Director of Intel Capital:

    “Cloud computing technologies play a crucial role in allowing companies to scale their data center infrastructure to meet performance and TCO requirements. Joyent’s approach to flexible and cost-effective cloud control and cloud development sets it apart and provides measureable performance advantages versus the competition in this fast growing sector.”

    It’s no wonder that Dell and Intel want to get in on a piece of this market while they still can.