Category: News

  • My First Week with the New BlackBerry Q10

    BlackBerry Q10 on bench

    Even though I’ve been fortunate enough to have my hands on a BlackBerry Q10 for quite some time, it wasn’t until just last week that I made the switch and started using it as my “daily driver”. In order to describe my experience in one word … I needed to invent a new word. So, I’m coining the phrase “Awesotypetastic” to describe this iconic new device from BlackBerry.

    There are a ton of features that make this one of my favorite BlackBerry smartphones of all time, and as the first BlackBerry 10 device to feature a physical keyboard, it has some big shoes to fill.

    Since launch I’ve been covering just what an interesting and powerful new mobile experience BlackBerry 10 is. With features like peek, the BlackBerry Hub and BlackBerry Flow built-in, the BlackBerry Q10 combines a classic BlackBerry keyboard and the power of BlackBerry 10. This experience translates well onto the BlackBerry Q10 and it brings some new innovations to market that improve productivity and are enabled by the physical keyboard.

    After one week with the device here are three of my favorite new features:

    Instant Action

    From the home screen on the BlackBerry Q10, just start typing a command on the physical keyboard to initiate the action. For example, if you want to BBM one of your contacts type “BBM + ” to enter BBM and start your conversation. You can also do this for a number of other actions. I particularly found this useful when using the phone one handed.

    Instant Action Commands

    Keyboard Shortcuts

    BlackBerry fans will no doubt appreciate the return of keyboard shortcuts to the device. Simple things like hitting “T” to jump to the top while in the BlackBerry Hub, or hitting “C” to compose a new message add up and help you keep moving quickly and fluidly through the device.

    BlackBerry Q10 keyboard

    Timeless Design

    The BlackBerry Q10 is a serious machine. It is built solid with premium materials and components. As soon as I held the BlackBerry Q10 in my hand it was clear to me everything had been specifically chosen for the Q10 to make every inch purpose-built. It is slim, yet solid and the beautiful glass weave back cover on the black color variant is thinner, lighter and stronger than plastic. Combined with the optimized new darker background in apps like Contacts, Remember, BBM, Search, Text Messaging, Adobe Reader, the experience is stunning inside the software and out.

    BlackBerry Q10 profile

    There you have it my first impressions and favourite features of the BlackBerry Q10 device. For more information on BlackBerry 10 be sure to check out my top 5 things for BlackBerry Q10 post, and definitely check out our Meet the new BlackBerry Q10 post from launch. Do you plan on picking up a new BlackBerry Q10 when it becomes available in your region? Let us know in the comments below.

  • BlackBerry Q10 review

    BlackBerry Q10 review
    BlackBerry’s famous hardware keyboard is finally becoming available on the company’s latest operating system called BlackBerry 10 in the coming days, and the company’s new phone is called the BlackBerry Q10. Meshing up BlackBerry’s brand new OS with the same core features and specs of the BlackBerry Z10, the Q10 is the answer for die-hard BlackBerry fanatics. But considering how good the on-screen keyboard is on the Z10 — it’s the absolute best software keyboard I have ever used, in fact — is the Q10 even necessary in this day and age?

    Continue reading…

  • The BlackBerry Q10 Is A QWERTY Keyboard Smartphone Comeback Worth Waiting For

    blackberryq10

    The BlackBerry Q10 is, some might say, the BlackBerry OS 10 device that the company should have led with, ahead of its all-touch Z10. That’s because it sports a hardware QWERTY keyboard, something that has become a unique distinction among top-tier smartphones these days. BlackBerry tells me they wanted to nail the all-touch experience first, in part to prove that they could, but based on my last few days with the Q10, this is the phone that’s more deserving of the “flagship” moniker for the new BlackBerry fleet.

    • 3.1-inch, 720×720, 330 PPI display
    • 2GB RAM
    • 16GB storage, expandable via microSD (supports up to 32GB cards)
    • Dual core 1.5GHz processor
    • 8 megapixel, 1080p rear camera; 2 megapixel, 720p front camera
    • microHDMI out
    • Dual-band 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-Fi
    • LTE or HSPA+, global roaming cellular connectivity
    • MSRP: Likely around $199 on a 2-year agreement

    Pros:

    • Solid industrial design
    • Good battery life
    • Hardware keyboard means business

    Cons:

    • App ecosystem still way behind
    • Display visibility suffers in bright light
    • Screen and bezel size hamper gestures

    The BlackBerry Q10 is proof that a handset can take cues from the past and still be a modern, attractive device. The PVD-coateed metal border that frames the phone won’t scratch easily, as it’s the same treatment used on high-end watches. The carbon/glass composite back is extremely light, yet flexible and strong enough to handle spills, and since it’s created using a process through which it’s cut from a giant sheet and then formed instead of injection moulded, no two backs will have exactly the same pattern. It’s lighter and smaller than the Z10, feels better in the hand and looks miles better, too.






    BlackBerry hasn’t reinvented the wheel with the Q10; you might have already seen one in the wild and mistaken it for a Bold, in fact. But the small changes pay big dividends. Straightening the top row of the keyboard and dropping the trackpad and hardware buttons provided room for a display that’s 30 percent larger than any previous BlackBerry QWERTY, for example, and yet typing actually feels better because of wider keys and bigger frets between the rows.

    My complaints when it comes to hardware design are limited, but the back panel has a bit of play, and will shift around a bit even when it’s supposed to be firmly clicked into place. It’s a little disconcerting given the overall fit and finish, but also doesn’t reveal itself awesome enough to be anything more than a minor annoyance.

    The BlackBerry Q10′s display is unique among modern smartphones in that it isn’t gigantic. Quite the opposite, in fact: at 3.1-inches, it’s the smallest screen of any flagship-priced device currently available on the market. Yet it’s also 30 percent larger than any of its QWERTY BlackBerry predecessors. And it’s a SuperAMOLED display, which translates to very nice color rendering, deep blacks, and good battery conservation.

    Overall, the display really impresses. It displays images and video with crisp, vibrant colors, and BlackBerry has even gone out of its way to tweak some user interface and core app elements to take advantage of the excellent black rendering, which also leads to battery life savings. But the display has its own downsides, too. It isn’t quite as densely packed with pixels as some of its top-tier Android competitors, for instance, and I noticed that in certain outdoor lighting conditions, owing partly to glare and partly to a weak backlight (which doesn’t auto-adjust), it can be fairly hard to make out what’s on the screen. Side-by-side with an iPhone in bright outdoor settings, the iPhone wins easily, every time.

    That said, the display is usable outside, and works surprisingly well for viewing photos indoors. Text rendering isn’t quite as nice on the Q10 as on Z10, but I also didn’t notice the same problems with surface grime accumulation that affected my Z10 review unit, so there might be a better oleophobic coating on this one.

    The Q10 is largely the same in terms of built-in software as the Z10, so I won’t go into as much detail about every single feature of BlackBerry OS 10 (check out my Z10 review for more on that). But it is worth highlighting the changes BlackBerry has made that take advantage of the Q10′s hardware keyboard, and also the trade-offs that sometimes result from those changes.

    The home screen arrangement has been tweaked slightly to make room for three rows of apps, and the toolbar size has been reduced as well as labels have been removed. There are new tooltips, which is great because it provides a smoother onboarding process for BB10. Text selection is made easier through refined cursor control, making it much less frustrating than it was on the Z10. Cut, copy and paste functions have been added to the dialer screen, and you can set account-specific notifications for incoming messages  as well as change vibration and volume patterns for alerts for specific contacts.

    Overall, BlackBerry has done a good job of taking in early user feedback and using it to actually improve BB10 in the areas where it was most lacking. The Q10 boasts BlackBerry OS 10.1, an update which will make its way to the Z10 within the coming weeks, bringing the same improvements over to that side of the fence, including the improvements above and crucial bug fixes for issues like the lack of calendar syncing for Outlook users. But the really impressive software features of the Q10 focus on the keyboard.

    The Q10 keyboard is always present, so it makes sense to make use of it whenever possible. BlackBerry has done this by introducing Instant Action, which allows you to start typing and then execute a variety of commands, in a variety of apps. there’s a huge list of keyboard shortcuts, but some highlights include being able to BBM contacts, Tweet, send emails and more all without opening the relevant app, from no matter where you are in the OS. It’s a remarkable time saver, and a good example of why the hardware keyboard still has something to offer in a world dominated by touchscreen displays.



    In general, software is improved, but since the Q10 uses the same touch-based gesture control as the Z10, but features a smaller bezel, it can be harder to execute Peek actions, or to navigate around the OS. Some improved sensitivity on the software side here would’ve helped the Q10′s software performance.

    The Q10′s camera is the same as the one found in the Z10, and as expected, performs in a very similar fashion. The big addition here is on the software side, since the Q10 with BlackBerry 10.1 now offers HDR. This is a feature that most OEMs have embraced lately, and also something I never find myself using on any mobile device. I’m also not a huge fan of it when used professionally by DSLR photographers. The addition isn’t hurting anything though, and will be welcome by those that appreciate it.




    Overall, the Q10′s camera is a solid performer. It won’t win any low-light awards, and that’s putting it lightly, but it can still manage to take some amazing shots, which look even more amazing with the slightly exaggerated color rendering of the OLED display. It also captures stills in 1:1 ratio by default to match the display, though you can set it to use either 16:9 or 4:3, too. Video is perfectly usable, too, and defaults to wide-screen capture.

    This is the one place where the Q10 doesn’t fare that much better than its counterpart the Z10. Despite the fact that BlackBerry has made a lot of noise about growing its own app marketplace to 100,000 titles, there still aren’t too many to write home about. Some big names have come on board, but crucial ones, like Netflix, Instagram and Vine, to name just a few, remain absent.

    The Q10′s app situation isn’t helped by the fact that it has such a unique screen size. The screen means that native BB10 apps have to be coded specifically to offer both Z10 and Q10 compatibility, which BlackBerry assures me is simple enough, but which still inevitably results in some fragmentation. Q10 users simply won’t see apps that aren’t designed for its display – unless they’re Android apps. Android ports still show up and can be downloaded and used.

    That’s a double-edged sword, however. I found performance to be unpredictable with Android ports; Songza, for instance, lacked its concierge feature when running on the Q10. Others had bizarre visual element distortions, and even when everything goes smoothly, it still requires scrolling through an interface designed to be viewed all at once.

    The Q10′s app situation is a reminder just how far BlackBerry has to go, and a signal that it will probably have a much more targeted audience than the general purpose Z10.

    Where the Z10 faltered with battery, the Q10 excels. BlackBerry claims that the Q10 can get up to 13.5 hours of 3G talk time, 354 hours standby time, 61 hours of audio playback or up to 9 hours of video. In testing video playback and solid browsing time, it managed to come just shy of that at around 8 hours continuous use, but the standby time is what’s really impressive. This phone sips power with the screen off when it’s in your pocket, harkening back to BlackBerrys of old. It isn’t quite as long-lived, but it’s still impressive for a modern smartphone.

    In actual usage, being neither extremely conservative or extremely power-hungry, the Q10 manages nearly two days of use in my testing, which is, again, very unusual for a smartphone. It boasts a larger 2100 mAh battery, compared to the Z10′s 1800 mAh unit. That means you can’t use the Z10′s external charger accessory to juice up the Q10′s battery, but BlackBerry offers the exact same device designed for the new phone’s battery, too.

    The BlackBerry Q10 is unique among smartphones, with its square display and hardware keyboard. And BlackBerry knows that it will appeal to a certain kind of consumer. What I found in using it, is that I actually gravitated towards tasks that were productive – zapping my inbox overload, typing up actual complete paragraphs for longer posts (I’ve never used another smartphone to do that), using the newly-ported Skype app to stay in touch with teammates. This is a business phone, and an unabashed one, and in a world where we often want our devices to do everything for us, a little focus is actually a very refreshing thing.

    That said, evaluate your priorities if you’re thinking about getting a Q10: the app situation is still dismal for BlackBerry 10, despite progress made since the official launch at the end of January. And the OS software itself still has some bugs, too: I experienced one black screen freeze that required a soft restart, and one issue where my cellular signal continually dropped until I turned cell traffic off and then on again. For those reasons, I still have trouble recommending it generally over the iPhone or a top-tier Android phone, if only because of the ecosystem that now surrounds those devices. But if you’re a BlackBerry lover, or if you long for the days when you could feel that keyboard under your fingers, the Q10 is very impressive device, especially from a company that more than a few people had completely counted out completely.

    The Q10 arrives in Canada and the U.K. first, beginning in early May (May 1st in Canada), with an expected rollout in the U.S. towards the end of May in the U.S. It’ll cost $199 on contract at Canadian carriers on a three-year agreement, and will run for $249 on a 2-year agreement in the U.S. That’s relatively steep, especially for a phone with 16GB of onboard storage, but I expect we’ll see discounts and special offers before too long, as we did with the Z10.

  • Facebook updates messenger app, adds new stickers

    facebook messenger

    Today, Facebook has updated their Messenger application to include stickers. Yes, you read that right. Emojis are boring, let’s start using stickers. There’s also support for new sticker packs and a sticker store. So if you’ve been enjoying using Messenger’s chat heads, you can now spice up some of your conversations with some stickers. Is it a huge update? No. But who doesn’t like stickers? Hit the download link below to check it out.

    QR Code generator

    Play Store Download Link

    Come comment on this article: Facebook updates messenger app, adds new stickers

  • Nokia reportedly scores deal with Verizon to carry next flaghip Lumia

    Nokia reportedly scores deal with Verizon to carry next flaghip Lumia
    It’s been a long wait for Verizon subscribers who double as Nokia fans, but they’re finally going to get a flagship Lumia phone on their network. Bloomberg reports that Nokia and Verizon have finalized a deal to bring the upcoming Lumia 928 flagship smartphone to Verizon’s network sometime later this year. An unnamed source confirms with Bloomberg that the Lumia 928 features “a metal body, 4.5-inch touch screen, 8-megapixel camera and wireless charging” and will be the first flagship Lumia to be sold exclusively by Verizon. Earlier leaked images of the Lumia 928 show that the device will also feature a PureView camera, Carl Zeiss optics and a xenon flash.

  • Use a custom kernel to turn your HTC One’s logo into a functional extra button

    HTC_One_Front_Bottom_Speaker_Capacitive_Buttons_TA

    Are you the proud owner of a new HTC One? Is your only complaint the weird button layout? Developer tbalden at XDA may be able to solve your problem with his new kernel tweak which turns the HTC button into a sleep button (which also enables the home button to wake the device) or a menu button, depending on your preference.

    This little tweak is possible since the digitizer of the HTC One extends a bit under the HTC button, which allows a different function to be assigned to it with a custom kernel. Currently, the hack isn’t 100% functional, and there’s been a tiny amount of weird behavior with it, but it’s definitely going to be a great mod as it’s further developed and tweaked. Hit the break below to check out the forum post to get the mod working on your shiny new phone.

    source: XDA

    Come comment on this article: Use a custom kernel to turn your HTC One’s logo into a functional extra button

  • A Google Glass rival emerges from an upstart in Japan

    TelepathyJapanese entrepreneur Takahito Iguchi wants people to see the world through other people’s eyes. But as a less ambitious jumping off point, he’ll kick it off with a world that looks like a Japanese manga cartoon. His device, called the Telepathy One, is the closest thing I’ve seen under development yet to Google’s Glass gadget, and at an event in New York City on Tuesday night, Iguchi and his team showed off prototypes (two working and several others just mockups) of the wearable image-streaming glasses to the media.

    Like with Google Glass, users wear the Telepathy One on the head, in front of the eye and wrapped around the ears. Telepathy actually has ear buds that fit into the ears, so you can presumably hear audio functionality when they add it in.IMG_0925

    Unlike with Google Glass, the Telepathy One has an optically projected small screen in front of the eye of the wearer, and a cell phone app controlled by the partner captures the images that the wearer sees in a tiny screen. The Telepathy team says the device will also be able to take photos or videos from the headset and stream those images to the partner’s cell phone app, but the prototype didn’t yet have that functionality.

    Iguchi emphasized that he wants the Telepathy One to enable users to share what they’re seeing with their loved ones. “You feel the love when your loved one is standing beside you,” said Iguchi, who flew in from Tokyo days before and half the time spoke to the group in English and half the time spoke in Japanese using an interpreter. The core functionality of the Telepathy One is social sharing of experiences in real time between people over distance, explained Iguchi. He pointed out that this is in contrast to some of the more open-ended apps that will come out of Google Glass.

    telepathy

    The first app that the Telepathy One will use is the Manga Camera app, which is a popular app in Japan that’s gotten 6 million downloads. For the demo, I put the headset on and the Telepathy team took photos of people around me, and the Manga-versions of those people streamed to the little projected screen in front of my eye.

    Sound a little weird? Well, that’s because it was a little weird. Seeing a bunch of strangers look like tiny black and white cartoons might not have the same type of pull as, say, seeing your best friend or partner as a goofy manga character. The prototype also wasn’t fitted comfortably enough to be able to see the image very well, so most people that tried the device on ended up holding it with their hand at a certain angle, looking up in an awkward manner, and practically squinting to see the image.

    SONY DSC

    The experience is also telling of the stage of development of the product. It’s in a really early stage. While the Telepathy team is shooting for a Christmas 2013 launch for the device, it’s far — far — from prime time. They’re still sourcing out suppliers for the components, and haven’t advanced enough to be able to give an estimated price on it (other than it’ll be cheaper than what Google is charging developers for Google Glass) or battery life time yet. There’s also a lot of planned functionality in the device that the team talked about but wasn’t even remotely there yet, like planned interfaces using audio, gesture, and touch (difficult things that are hard to get right).

    At the same time, I do like some of the choices that the Telepathy team have made. Choosing one functionality (social image sharing only) and trying to make it really simple, I think are smart. Iguchi likened the Telepathy One and Google Glass to the iPods of the world trying to create an entirely new type of industry that people don’t know yet that they want. The device that can break through this type of difficult market will need to have one killer app to define the need and win people over.

    The Telepathy One isn’t really a threat to Google. The team has 8 people working on the device, and formed the venture in January 2013. And as Iguchi said at the beginning of his talk while they’ve introduced their baby, it’s not really even born yet. The group introduced the Telepathy One at SXSW last month, and will be in Silicon Valley next month looking to connect with developers.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Netflix has already recouped its $100 million House of Cards investment

    Netflix may have already recouped House of Cards investment through subscriber growth
    Netflix spent around $100 million to produce the first two seasons of House of Cards, the original drama that stars Kevin Spacey as a comically oily United States congressman. But while this may sound like a big investment for the hugely popular content distributor, analysis from The Atlantic Wire shows that it may just be a drop in the bucket in the bigger scheme of things. According to The Atlantic Wire’s calculations, Netflix has already earned its $100 million back “by adding more than 2 million U.S. subscribers this quarter and another 1 million elsewhere in the world,” thus giving Netflix a strong incentive to produce more original content going forward. Netflix posted impressive earnings on Monday and announced that its subscriber base in the United States had risen to over 29 million, thus giving it more American subscribers than HBO.

  • Hey Silicon Valley, innovation isn’t all about you

    We always hear how smart and creative the Valley is. It’s home to hundreds of startups, thousands of apps and billions of dollars in venture money. You might think from all the hype that it has a lock on innovation.

    Kitchen-AId

    Not true. Companies in old-line industries — little brand names like Goodyear, which reaped $21 billion in net sales last year;  Brown Brothers Harriman, the country’s oldest and largest private bank; Whirlpool, the appliance conglomerate behind thWhirlpool, Amana, Kitchen-Aid, Jenn-Air and Maytag brands; and the Mayo Clinic, the 150-year-old hospital to the stars – know a little something about innovation too. Or they probably wouldn’t still be around.

    Executives at those companies tasked with keeping them stocked with new ideas for products and services were on hand in Boston Tuesday at an Imaginatik-sponsored event to talk about how they do what they do. Here were six things I learned.e

    1: Make innovation a priority and put someone in charge of it.

    No, you don’t have to dub this person a Chief Innovation Officer (CINO), but you’ve got to give him or her access to the top and the authority to be heard across all business units. A couple speakers invoked the name of Louis Gerstner, the former IBM CEO credited with turning that company around.

    When Gerstner came into IBM at the height of the dot.com boom, he wondered why IBM hadn’t come up with web servers or search engines. “When they looked inside IBM labs, it turns out it had but [those ideas] hadn’t been surfaced,” said James Euchner, VP of Global Innovation for Goodyear, Akron, Ohio.

    And given the ratio of failures to successes in any business, innovators should be allowed to try things and fail, said Whirlpool’s Global Director of Innovation Moises Norena. Lessons learned from failures, after all, can be invaluable.

    2: Think outside the box

    goodyear blimpWho could have predicted that a freezer manufacturer should also be in the garage organizer business? But that’s what Whirlpool figured out.

    “If you want to sell appliances that go in the garage, you probably need to help [people] clean that garage out first,” said Moises Norena, global director of innovation for Whirlpool, Benton Harbor, Mich. And thus,  Whirlpool’s Gladiator Garageworks line of storage organizers was born.

    New York-based Brown Brothers Harriman has done well in banking, where lending money has worked pretty much the same way for the last thousand years. “We don’t need to reinvent that wheel but we always want new services for our clients,” said Philip Swisher, SVP of innovation for the 200-year-old private bank, which manages $3 trillion in assets.

    Sure, $3 trillion is a lotbig, but BBH’s most direct competitor, State Street Bank is ten times bigger; so Swisher’s always on the lookout for new services.

    He encourages all of the company’s 5,000 employees to pitch ideas and use Intuit’s Brainstorm cloud platform for global collaboration. “All employees have access — it has no permissions by design,” he said.

    3: Research, research, research

    Mayo ClinicWhen most people go to the doctor, they want to see the doctor — or that’s the conventional wisdom anyway. But in most cases, they don’t really need to see a doctor, said Lorna Ross, design manager and creative lead for the Mayo Clinic’s Center of Innovation in Rochester, Minn.

    The center gathered a whole primary care team — nurses, pharmacists, a resident — to review patients every day and determine the best course of action for each. It turns out, that only 6 percent of those patients really needed a doctor. That’s admittedly a “controversial” finding for an organization that sees itself a patient care provider.  GigaOM’s Ki Mae Heussner recently detailed another medical practice with a similar holistic approach.

    But, if you think about it, most people go to the doctor about a problem and if that problem can be addressed by a nurse, physician’s assistant, pharmacist, most patients are happy. Better evaluation of the patient up front can ease the primary care bottleneck and cut costs, Ross said.

    4: Know how to deal with people, not just technology

    It may sound creepy but successful innovators need to be social engineers. “You have to know your corporate culture to affect change,” said  BBH’s Swisher. “You can’t ‘train’ an executive, but you can ‘brief’ one. I wear a suit every day because if I showed up in jeans and spiky hair no one would take me seriously and I don’t want to provoke the immune response.”

    BBH has remained private and has been remarkably stable since Brown Brothers merged with Harriman Brothers in 1931 — “we have an 80-year track record of no M&A,” Swisher said proudly. Initiating change in a way that doesn’t capsize that stable boat is his goal.

    5: But technology is important too

    Trends like the internet of things (IoT) and the maker movement are of keen interest to both Whirlpool and Goodyear, for example. While Norena said he doesn’t see huge demand from customers wanting program their washing machines from their iPads, he does see other opportunities — Whirlpool already has a smartgrid effort, for example. But he is intrigued by the notion of forging a connection between the food you’re cooking and the device you use to cook it.

    “What if you have a branded product you put in the microwave which reads the instructions — maybe it scans a code on the popcorn bag so itknows the size and type of corn and pops it optimally?” he asked.

    Euchner said Goodyear is trying to understand two things about the IoT. First, it has to make sure tire sensors will work reliably. Second, it has to figure out where all that intelligence ends up. Sensors are great for monitoring tire pressure and issuing alerts when the tires wear out. But, for vendors like Goodyear, the question is, who gets those alerts? The driver?  The car dealer? The manufacturer? If that data goes to a dealer, the car may end up with non-Goodyear tires, he said. Maybe not an earth shaker for the driver, but certainly not good for Goodyear.

    6: Be creative but careful

    Brown Brothers HarrimanIt’s good to improve existing products, but be careful of messing with success.  Norena and I discussed the popular Kitchen-Aid countertop mixer (pictured above left.) I don’t use mine as much as I should be cause it’s big and heavy and dragging it out of the cupboard is a pain even though it does the job better and more uniformly than my dinky hand-held mixer. Norena agreed but said it would be foolhardy to mess with something with so iconic.

    Mayo Clinic photo courtesy of  Flickr user -Tripp-

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Salesforce.com seeks more advertising, marketing revenue from social

    At a glitzy Salesforce.com event in San Francisco on Tuesday, it became clear that the coming connection between customer-relationship management tools and social-listening and social-advertising features isn’t just a neat upgrade for Salesforce users. It’s an attempt by Salesforce to get business from advertising and marketing agencies that want to do a better job of targeting specific customer segments.

    The big-picture goal is to carry out on an “incredible new vision for what it means to market and how to transform your company and just get much closer to your customers,” to use the words of Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff.

    At least for one marketing and advertising company on hand to talk up the Salesforce news on Tuesday, the integration between the CRM and social publishing is a welcome improvement.

    “What Salesforce talked about today is something we had to do a little bit more manually before but just one more step in the evolution of our craft,” said Jonathan Nelson, CEO of Omnicom Digital.

    It does seem that contacting leads on social media in response to what people say could bring about more deals and turn whiny users into advocates. What Salesforce is trying to do here is make the most of its CRM service — and also grow it — to help advertisers and marketers do their jobs better. Salesforce has already signed up WPP Group, Mindshare, Resolution and other big companies, and if results beat out other options, the more than $1 billion Salesforce spent on the two social listening and publishing companies enabling the new CRM-publishing connection could pay off.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • VMware boosts quarterly revenue and sees a good year ahead

    VMware executives told investors Tuesday that they were pleased with the company’s performance in the first quarter of the year, boasting $1.19 billion in revenues, up 13 percent year over year, even as profits slipped 9 percent to $174 million. Earnings per share of 74 cents exceeded analyst expectations on average by 4 cents.

    Adoption of products slated for release later this year have executives feeling hopeful about seeing this year’s total revenues. They should come in 14 percent to 16 percent ahead of last year when taking into account the removal of revenues and costs related to the Pivotal Initiative, Chief Financial Officer Jonathan Chadwick said on a call with investors. Last year’s revenue came in at $4.6 billion.

    Following on VMware’s $1.26 billion acquisition of network-virtualization player Nicira, VMware will ship its NSX software, drawing on elements of Nicira software, in the second half of the year. NSX will lower customers’ capital and operational expenditures and “transform network operations in a non-disruptive manner,” said President Carl Eschenbach.

    Eschenbach also said the vCloud Hybrid service will launch on May 21.

    Rather than expecting a negative impact from the OpenStack movement, VMware CEO Pat Gelsinger said he sees OpenStack as offering “an expanding addressable market for VMware.”

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • iTunes still dominates market for video downloads

    iTunes still dominates market for video downloads
    Apple’s iTunes has long dominated the market for online music purchases and it seems that it holds a similar stranglehold on the market for online movie and TV show purchases as well. New data from the NPD Group shows that iTunes accounts for 65% of all online movie downloads and 67% of all online TV show downloads, putting it significantly ahead of both Amazon Instant Video, which accounts for 10% of movie downloads and 8% of TV show downloads, and Xbox video, which accounts for 10% of movie downloads and 14% of TV show downloads. NPD analyst Russ Crupnick says that iTunes has stayed on top of the online video market because “Apple has successfully leveraged its first-mover advantage and of iTunes, iOS and the popularity of iPhone and iPad” to secure an enduring market advantage.

  • Why facial recognition software isn’t ready for prime time

    In the wake of the manhunt for the Boston bombers, opinions are divided on whether facial recognition technology helped or hindered the search. Headlines like “Why Facial Recognition Failed” (Salon.com) are echoed in a statement from the Boston police commissioner, who told The Washington Post that the technology “came up empty.”

    The opposite interpretation can be found at Technorati (“Facial Recognition Technology Helps Identify Boston Marathon Bombing Suspects”). So who is right, and were today’s facial recognition techniques up to the task?

    The high-tech video intelligence methods hyped in the media during the manhunt may be available for use by investigators, but that doesn’t mean they’re effective or actually used by law enforcement. Neither San Francisco nor San Jose police use facial recognition, for example, and an FBI biometric system planned for introduction in California and eight other states next year apparently only makes exploratory use of face recognition, relying instead mostly on the trusty fingerprint.

    Jim Wayman, director of the National Biometric Test Center at San Jose State University, said automated facial recognition didn’t fail in the Boston case: it simply wasn’t used. Contrary to reports like that of San Francisco’s ABC7, Wayman said video intelligence company 3VR’s products were not used to find the Boston bombing suspects.

    3VR did not respond to our request for comment. The FBI also has no large-scale automated face recognition system, according to Wayman.

    The essential problem with face recognition is getting an algorithm to correctly match degraded cell phone or surveillance images with well-lit, head-on photos of faces. While this is effortless for the human brain (unless you have prosopagnosia), hair, hats, sunglasses, and facial expressions can throw off automated recognition methods. Of course, before you can even get to the matching stage, you have to identify a suspect, and hope their face is included in driver’s license, mugshot, or other databases.

    Face_recognition_with_hopfield_network

    What video surveillance more broadly was useful for in the Boston case was tracking the movements of the suspects. This still required a considerable human effort: the Post reports one agent watching the same video clip 400 times.

    The next development step for facial recognition, both academically and commercially, is 3D, using shadows and facial landmarks to create best-guess models of faces. Face recognition challenges organized by the National Institute of Standards and Technology have expedited improvements at a Moore’s law-like pace, but the nuances that impede computers, like image alignment, occlusion, and face angle, remain a problem.

    Better and cheaper (and more ubiquitous) cameras should address the issues of grainy and blurry images; an international standard requires a resolution of 90 pixels between the eyes for facial recognition algorithms to work, says Wayman, whereas the images released of the Boston suspects had 12-20 pixels. A database with which to compare is still required, however; identifying and tracking a face across video streams would be much more useful.

    And even when facial recognition technologies improve and mature, the question still remains: should they be ready for prime time, in a way reminiscent of Minority Report? Wayman said currently employed systems that compare live people to their passport photos at airports still have a false negative rate of about 15 percent. If performance in such controlled situations is so fickle, it seems there is still a lot of work to do before these systems can automatically, and accurately, pick out faces of interest from surveillance footage.

    Image via Wikimedia Commons user Mrazvan22

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Rugged Galaxy S 4 Coming Soon According to Samsung

    us_cellular_samsung_galaxy_s_4

    In a not-so-veiled attempt at bringing multiple versions of the Galaxy S 4 to the world, it’s not surprising that Samsung is planning on bringing a rugged version out. That’s right folks, all of you who are prone to dropping your phone, flinging it across the room, or accidentally spilling water on it can rest easier. It’s a peace of mind knowing that you can purchase the flagship device and have it hold up against all the abuse thrown at it. According to Young Soo Kim, President of Samsung Gulf, we’re just weeks away from seeing a waterproof and dust proof version of the GS4.

    As nice as that sounds, we have yet to hear about which markets will see the device or even how much it will cost. Of course we’ll know more when the device actually gets announced.  Even as such, this should entice those clumsy people, myself included, into purchasing Samsung’s latest flagship device. Even if it doesn’t,well, at least it will lead to multiple GS4 beating videos being posted to the internet. I can hear the squeals of joy now.

    source: Techview.me
    via: Phone Arena

    Come comment on this article: Rugged Galaxy S 4 Coming Soon According to Samsung

  • President Obama Welcomes Amir Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani of Qatar to the White House

    President Obama today met with Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, the Amir of Qatar, a nation the United States works with on a range of issues, including security, military cooperation, commerce and trade. 

    In remarks following the bilateral meeting in the Oval Office, the President praised  Qatar as "a center of innovation" and said the country has shown enormous progress ranging from education to health care under the Amir's leadership. 

    But President Obama said that most of the leaders' conversation was focused on security issues in that region, relating to U.S. interests and those of the entire world:

    "We had a conversation about the situation in Syria. And obviously we've been cooperating closely with Qatar and other countries in seeking to bring about an end to the slaughter that's taking place there; the removal of President Assad, who has shown himself to have no regard for his own people; and to strengthen an opposition that can bring about a democratic Syria that represents all people and respects their rights regardless of their ethnicity or their religious affiliations. And I'm very pleased that we are going to be continuing to work in coming months to try to further support the Syrian opposition, and we'll be closely coordinating our strategies to bring about a more peaceful resolution to the Syrian crisis.

    We also had an opportunity to discuss the situation in Egypt, where we both very much want to see success on the part of Egyptian democracy. And both of our countries are committed to trying to encourage not only progress in this new democracy, but also economic progress that can translate into actual prosperity for the people there.

    We had an opportunity to discuss the situation with respect to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and we both agree that peace is in the interest of everyone — a secure Israel side-by-side with a sovereign Palestinian state. And we exchanged ideas about how we can advance those negotiations, and I've shared the importance of providing support to President Abbas and the Palestinian Authority so that they can be in position to have fruitful negotiations with the Israelis that can bring about, in a timely fashion, a two-state solution.

    And I had an opportunity to thank the Amir for the strong support that his country has provided to our efforts in Afghanistan, including the efforts that he has personally been involved with in getting a dialogue between the Afghan government and the Taliban that might potentially result in some sort of political reconciliation. 

    These are all very difficult issues and neither of us are under any illusions that they will be solved overnight.  But what we agree with is that if our two countries are communicating frankly and constructively, and pursuing common strategies, that we can be a force for good for the entire region and for a vision of a Middle East that is democratic, that is prosperous, that is tolerant, that is representative of all peoples, and that is a force for good around the world."

    read more

  • As the iPhone matures, Apple looks to older versions to drive growth

    Nearly six years into its life, the iPhone is still Apple’s most important product, but it is no longer a rocket engine propelling Apple to spectacular growth. The company sold 37.4 million iPhones between January and March, which is just 6.5 percent more than the same quarter a year ago. It seems pretty clear the days of more than doubling unit sales nearly every quarter are over.

    This was bound to happen eventually: Apple is facing stiffer competition than it ever has in smartphones, especially overseas with lower-priced devices that run Android. The competition is getting better at the high end as well, and is also releasing new smartphones seemingly every few months. And at the same time, Apple’s been selling the iPhone in more established markets for almost six years.

    This doesn’t mean the iPhone is doomed or dead. We’ve just entered a new era of the iPhone — one where the company relies more than ever on older, cheaper devices to continue to expand the ranks of iPhone customers. On Tuesday, CEO Tim Cook gave the example of how this is working in the Greater China region, where the nearly three-year-old iPhone 4 is popular:

    China has an unusually large number of potential first-time smartphone buyers and that’s not lost on us. We’ve seen a significant interest in iPhone 4 there and have recently made it even more affordable to make it even more attractive to those first-time buyers. We’re hopeful that helps iPhone sales in the future.

    And, he added later, that’s not limited to China: “We’re continuing to do that in other markets. We believe the [iPhone 4] for the price point we’re offering is an incredible value for people that allows people to get into the ecosystem with a really, really phenomenal product.”

    Cook didn’t reveal exactly how many iPhone 4 devices Apple sold in the China region (or anywhere for that matter), but recent data from Consumer Intelligence Research Partners shows that preference for cheaper iPhones is a broad theme among recent purchasers in the U.S. too. According to its survey data, the iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S accounted for 47 percent of all the iPhones sold between January and March. The latest model iPhone 5, while still the top seller, represented the lowest ratio of late-model iPhone to older model iPhones Apple has seen. By comparison, the iPhone 4S was still accounting for 73 percent of iPhone sales two quarters after its debut.

    If interest in the brand-new iPhone is declining that quickly, barely two quarters into its life, then Apple has two choices if it wants to keep the iPhone growing. It can roll out new devices more often or try to drive volumes with cheaper models.

    Since Apple is a bit of a perfectionist when it comes to details and doesn’t seem the type to pump out products that could lead to brand dilution, the most practical move seems to be the one Cook is pursuing now: relying on the status and cachet attached to the iPhone name and offer older model devices to people who can for the first time afford an Apple product.

    This is not unlike the company’s iPod strategy: the original iPod in 2001 cost $399, and over the years the company expanded the lineup with more models and storage size choices and brought down the price all the way to the current $49 impulse-buy level price of the iPod nano. It famously provided a much-needed halo-effect for Apple, where first-time customers bought into the iTunes ecosystem, and then the Mac, and in later years the iPhone and possibly iPad. Apple wants the same thing from brand-new customers who pick up an iPhone 4 for free on contract or at a very low price: that those new buyers sign up for iTunes, download some apps, music and TV shows, and store their documents in iCloud — as Cook puts it in the quote above, “get into the ecosystem.”

    The iPod eventually gave way to the iPhone as the growth driver for Apple. So with the iPhone maturing, the billion-dollar question is what comes next for Apple after the iPhone? That’s what’s not clear yet. Cook telegraphed new products coming “this fall” and “throughout 2014″ but of course didn’t explain whether those were mobile computing products or TVs or whatever.

    In the meantime, while it may not be a completely parallel replacement for the iPhone, the iPad is just three years old and still growing; not to mention the iPad mini which is also just two quarters old. At this point, the countdown is on for when it replaces the iPhone as Apple’s most important product.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Microsoft expands Surface RT and Surface Pro availability to over 25 markets

    Microsoft expands Surface RT and Surface Pro availability to more than 25 markets
    Microsoft on Tuesday announced that the Surface RT and Surface Pro tablets will be heading to additional markets in the coming weeks. The Surface RT will arrive in Malaysia on April 25th, Mexico by the end of May, and in South Korea and Thailand in June. The Surface Pro will launch “before the end of May” in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. It will also launch in South Korea, Malaysia, Russia, Singapore and Thailand “before the end of June.” The expanded availability will bring Microsoft’s Windows RT tablet to a total of 29 markets in time for the summer months, and its Windows 8 slate to 27 markets. The company has also vowed to increase production of the 128GB Surface Pro model to ensure the high-capacity slate remains in stock.

  • CW comes to Xbox, no cable subscription required

    If TV shows and Xbox are your things, today is your lucky day. Xbox Live has been busy adding content to its Gold offering in an effort to beef up its entertainment features and bring in the non-gaming audience by positioning the console as a living room entertainment hub.

    Today, Xbox Live chief Larry Hryb announces that the latest outlet to come on board is the CW network. This is also a unique offering in that, unlike channels such as HBO and ESPN, the CW will not require customers to verify a paid TV service subscription from a cable or satellite provider. The new app will offer shows ranging from “full episodes to previews and interviews, and is unique in that it will offer next-day episodes free with your Xbox LIVE Gold subscription” according to Hryb.

    The new CW offering also utilizes Xbox Smartglass for some of its most popular content, such as The Vampire Diaries. “As viewers tune into The CW app on Xbox this Friday for the latest episode titled ‘The Originals’, they can access an exclusive Xbox SmartGlass experience that will provide exciting new content via their smartphone or tablet not available to any other viewers” Hryb explains.

    Microsoft also plans a giveaway that will be conducted via Facebook and feature custom “Vampire Diaries” and “Supernatural” Xbox 360 consoles. Details of how to enter were not included in the announcement.

    Like other Xbox entertainment options, CW does require a Gold subscription, but with no paid TV subscription required, this offering seems geared towards cord-cutters, and with HBO contemplating a similar offering for its GO service, this could spell trouble for the providers. That is really the most intriguing part of this latest offering.

    Photo Credit: Major Nelson

  • Taxing Internet sales is the right thing to do

    The fight to keep brick and mortar commerce subsidizing e-commerce is in a crucial stage today.

    You never heard of that fight? It also goes under the guise of fighting “Internet sales taxes”. A bill (the “Marketplace Fairness Act”) is moving along in the Senate that requires merchants with $1 million or more in revenue to collect any sales taxes due in the state of the buyer.

    The buyer is already responsible for such taxes, called “use taxes” when paid by the buyer. Real businesses actually pay these taxes, but only a small proportion of consumers, sometimes known as “suckers”, pay them. It’s rare for anyone to get in trouble (although I did once in 1986).

    I am, by inclination, a small-government type, a quasi-libertarian. A new way to tax people for engaging in commerce is not what I’m usually looking for. That’s not the issue here: sales taxes are applied at stores with physical presence in the state but not those selling remotely. This is inherently unfair to the brick-and-mortar businesses. I’m probably all for cutting sales tax rates to “starve the beast” but I’m not for taxing commerce sold one way and not the other.

    Would online sales taxes help or hurt small business? Some would be helped, some would be hurt. Small businesses operating in the venue of big businesses like eBay would be hurt because the auctioneer clearly does more than $1 million in revenue. For this reason, eBay has started a “spam your congressman” campaign to oppose the legislation. Amazon.com, on the other hand, actually supports the new law. Amazon and its local affiliates have been the target of states for not collecting such taxes from out-of-state customers and perhaps company execs think that they’re well-positioned to benefit from an environment where everyone has to collect them.

    The main complaint about such taxes used to be based on the legal reason why, back before e-commerce, courts found that out-of-state merchants were not obligated to collect them: It was too great a burden. There’s no credible case left for the substantial burden argument. Software and Internet services are very capable of determining sales taxes owed based on an address.

    Now the complaint is the burden to small business. Well, if you’re doing your own e-commerce collections and have under $1 million in revenue it’s not a problem for you. The $1 million ceiling for the exemption is likely to create some perverse incentives for companies near that number, perhaps to split into multiple businesses so as to stay under the limit. Personally, I wouldn’t even support the limit. Everyone who does e-commerce above the level of emailing “send me a check and I’ll mail it you” uses outside services which are, or should be, perfectly capable of collecting such revenues.

    I’ve seen some really lame complaints about this: “Local businesses use the local services that the taxes pay for; a business out of state doesn’t”. True, but sales taxes are consumption taxes. The buyer pays, not the merchant. That’s why the buyer has to come up with the money. And the buyer is in the state where the taxes are due.

    Lame complaint #2: “Internet buyers are already paying for shipping, why should they also have to pay taxes?” They should pay for shipping because they are getting the item shipped. Taxes have nothing to do with this. And there are lots of circumstances, more and more lately, where shipping costs are not directly charged. I’m an Amazon Prime customer and one of the things I get is 2-day shipping included on most of the items I buy.

    I would respect the arguments of businesses and Republicans organizing against sales taxes for remote Internet sales if they showed some concern for the injustice that the system creates for local businesses. Is there a better solution? I’m willing to listen.

    Photo Credit: 3Dstock/Shutterstock

  • Can chip companies profit off the maker movement? TI is betting on it

    TI launched a new version of its BeagleBone development board Tuesday that cuts the price in half and offers a lot more functionality. It also launched a $50 sensor board bundle packed with on-board motion and environmental sensors as well as GPS. The moves are aggressive, and they put TI’s new BeagleBone Black in direct competition with Arduino boards and the Raspberry Pi developer computers.

    The details on the new BeagleBone board are here, but basically TI is offering a 1 GHz ARM processor plus the connectivity and power components on a single board for $45. That’s a lot of compute power for a little price. While the Raspberry Pi costs $35 it doesn’t have as many ports built in, and Adrian Valenzuel, marketing director of TI’s Sitara ARM processor product line, said it also isn’t as open.

    When pressed, he said that people who build with the Pi can’t buy the hardware that comprises the Pi board on the open market, unlike with the TI board. He’s right. The chip on the Pi is built by Broadcom, but it’s not something that anyone can simply order and play with. On the flip side, Atmel, the company that makes the processors on the Arduino boards, sells those components and has released software supporting the Arduino community.

    beagleboneTI

    And while some people might be content to play with $35 Pis, there are plenty of people thinking about pro-quality projects that might want to get even more granular than the board, and try their hand at tweaking the components around the processor. That’s TI’s sales pitch as it moves down market to the class of makers who love the power of the Pi over the ubiquitous (in Maker circles, anyway) Arduino.

    TI’s hope is that by getting people playing with its board it can sell components and attract a user base that wants to play with its hardware. It may never be a huge business, but it’s one that chip makers are paying attention to. Earlier this year AMD introduced its GizmoSphere board, a $200 board and developer community for makers.

    While none of the companies involved are willing to share any sense of how these products may help them financially, it’s clear that chip firms are eying the maker community as a market worth paying attention to, especially as the internet of things heats up.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.